Abstract
Background and aims
Performing multiple tasks simultaneously may result in reduced performance of subtasks (dual-task cost) particularly among old individuals. Subtask performance during dual tasking is also known to be affected by task prioritization. However, it has not been well studied how the performance of subtasks is affected during motor dual task in old adults compared to young when instructed to prioritize one task over the other. This study aims to investigate the dual-task effect on subtasks during motor dual tasking under specific instruction of task prioritization in old compared to young adults.
Methods
Sixteen independent old and 18 young adults performed two single tasks (usual walking, holding a tray as steady as possible while standing) and two dual tasks (walking while holding a tray focusing attention on keeping tray as steady as possible—WTAT, and walking while holding tray focusing attention on walking—WTAW). Gait parameters [velocity and variability (coefficient of variation, CV) of stride length] and the pitch (forward–backward) and roll (side-to-side) angles of the tray were measured during the four conditions.
Results
During the WTAT compared to single tasks, both young and old groups showed reduced gait velocity (β = −14.0 for old, −34.3 for young), increased gait variability (β = 0.19 for old, 0.51 for young), and increased tray tilt (β = 9.4 for old, 7.9 for young in pitch; β = 8.8 for old, 5.9 for young in roll). Higher proportion of older individuals showed higher dual-task effect on tray stability, but lower dual-task effect on gait compared to young individuals. During WTAW, there was no difference in dual-task effect between age groups in tray stability or gait performance.
Conclusions
Compared to young, older adults tend to compromise the task involving upper limbs during motor dual tasking even when instructed to prioritize this task over gait. These findings may have ramifications on developing training strategies to learn or relearn complex motor activities in seniors.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hollman JH, Kovash FM, Kubik JJ, Linbo RA (2007) Age-related differences in spatiotemporal markers of gait stability during dual task walking. Gait Posture 26:113–119
Laessoe U, Hoeck HC, Simonsen O, Voigt M (2008) Residual attentional capacity amongst young and elderly during dual and triple task walking. Hum Mov Sci 27:496–512
Ebersbach G, Dimitrijevic MR, Poewe W (1995) Influence of concurrent tasks on gait: a dual-task approach. Percept Mot Skills 81:107–113
Shumway-Cook A, Guralnik JM, Phillips CL, Coppin AK, Ciol MA, Bandinelli S, Ferrucci L (2007) Age-associated declines in complex walking task performance: the Walking InCHIANTI toolkit. J Am Geriatr Soc 55:58–65
Lundin-Olsson L, Nyberg L, Gustafson Y (1998) Attention, frailty, and falls: the effect of a manual task on basic mobility. J Am Geriatr Soc 46:758–761
Verghese J, Kuslansky G, Holtzer R, Katz M, Xue X, Buschke H, Pahor M (2007) Walking while talking: effect of task prioritization in the elderly. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 88:50–53
Yogev-Seligmann G, Rotem-Galili Y, Mirelman A, Dickstein R, Giladi N, Hausdorff JM (2010) How does explicit prioritization alter walking during dual-task performance? Effects of age and sex on gait speed and variability. Phys Ther 90:177–186
Kelly VE, Janke AA, Shumway-Cook A (2010) Effects of instructed focus and task difficulty on concurrent walking and cognitive task performance in healthy young adults. Exp Brain Res 207:65–73
Huxhold O, Li SC, Schmiedek F, Lindenberger U (2006) Dual-tasking postural control: aging and the effects of cognitive demand in conjunction with focus of attention. Brain Res Bull 69:294–305
Srygley JM, Mirelman A, Herman T, Giladi N, Hausdorff JM (2009) When does walking alter thinking? Age and task associated findings. Brain Res 1253:92–99
Springer S, Giladi N, Peretz C, Yogev G, Simon ES, Hausdorff JM (2006) Dual-tasking effects on gait variability: the role of aging, falls, and executive function. Mov Disord 21:950–957
Yogev-Seligmann G, Hausdorff JM, Giladi N (2008) The role of executive function and attention in gait. Mov Disord 23:329–342 (quiz 472)
Bond JM, Morris M (2000) Goal-directed secondary motor tasks: their effects on gait in subjects with Parkinson disease. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 81:110–116
O’Bryant SE, Humphreys JD, Smith GE, Ivnik RJ, Graff-Radford NR, Petersen RC, Lucas JA (2008) Detecting dementia with the mini-mental state examination in highly educated individuals. Arch Neurol 65:963–967
Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR (1975) “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 12:189–198
Yesavage JA, Brink TL, Rose TL, Lum O, Huang V, Adey M, Leirer VO (1982) Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report. J Psychiatr Res 17:37–49
Holtzer R, Verghese J, Wang C, Hall CB, Lipton RB (2008) Within-person across-neuropsychological test variability and incident dementia. JAMA 300:823–830
Holtzer R, Verghese J, Xue X, Lipton RB (2006) Cognitive processes related to gait velocity: results from the Einstein Aging Study. Neuropsychology 20:215–223
Guralnik JM, Simonsick EM, Ferrucci L, Glynn RJ, Berkman LF, Blazer DG, Scherr PA, Wallace RB (1994) A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission. J Gerontol 49:M85–M94
Stewart AL, Mills KM, King AC, Haskell WL, Gillis D, Ritter PL (2001) CHAMPS physical activity questionnaire for older adults: outcomes for interventions. Med Sci Sports Exerc 33:1126–1141
Reitan R (1958) Validity of the Trail Making Test as an indicator of organic brain damage. Percept Mot Skills 8:271–276
Siu KC, Chou LS, Mayr U, van Donkelaar P, Woollacott MH (2009) Attentional mechanisms contributing to balance constraints during gait: the effects of balance impairments. Brain Res 1248:59–67
Verghese J, Holtzer R, Lipton RB, Wang C (2009) Quantitative gait markers and incident fall risk in older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 64:896–901
Verghese J, Holtzer R, Lipton RB, Wang C (2009) Quantitative gait markers and incident fall risk in older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 64:896–901
Brach JS, Studenski SA, Perera S, VanSwearingen JM, Newman AB (2007) Gait variability and the risk of incident mobility disability in community-dwelling older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 62:983–988
Cutlip RG, Mancinelli C, Huber F, DiPasquale J (2000) Evaluation of an instrumented walkway for measurement of the kinematic parameters of gait. Gait Posture 12:134–138
Verghese J, Katz MJ, Derby CA, Kuslansky G, Hall CB, Lipton RB (2004) Reliability and validity of a telephone-based mobility assessment questionnaire. Age Ageing 33:628–632
Kressig RW, Beauchet O (2006) Guidelines for clinical applications of spatio-temporal gait analysis in older adults. Aging Clin Exp Res 18:174–176
Verbeke G, Molaschi M (2000) Linear mixed models for longitudinal data. Springer, New York, p 19–29
Verghese J, Buschke H, Viola L, Katz M, Hall C, Kuslansky G, Lipton R (2002) Validity of divided attention tasks in predicting falls in older individuals: a preliminary study. J Am Geriatr Soc 50:1572–1576
Hausdorff JM (2005) Gait variability: methods, modeling and meaning. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2:19
Siu KC, Chou LS, Mayr U, Donkelaar P, Woollacott MH (2008) Does inability to allocate attention contribute to balance constraints during gait in older adults? J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 63:1364–1369
Bloem BR, Valkenburg VV, Slabbekoorn M, Willemsen MD (2001) The Multiple Tasks Test: development and normal strategies. Gait Posture 14:191–202
Siu KC, Woollacott MH (2007) Attentional demands of postural control: the ability to selectively allocate information-processing resources. Gait Posture 25:121–126
Silsupadol P, Shumway-Cook A, Lugade V, van Donkelaar P, Chou LS, Mayr U, Woollacott MH (2009) Effects of single-task versus dual-task training on balance performance in older adults: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 90:381–387
Acknowledgments
We thank the study participants at United Hebrew of New Rochelle. We also thank Nora O’Brian, PT DPT, Linda Forman, Margaret Curran, Po-Ching Li, and Amy Park for help with recruitment, data collection and processing. Mooyeon Oh-Park is an Einstein Men’s Division Scholar partially supported through a National Institutes of Health ‘Clinical and Translational Science Award ‘(CTSA) grant UL1 RR025750 and KL2RR025749 from the National Center for Research Resources, a component of the National Institutes of Health, and National Institutes of Health roadmap for Medical Research.
Conflict of interest
We certify that no party having a direct interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit on us or on any organization with which we are associated and, if applicable, we certify that all financial and material support for this research (eg, NIH or NHS grants) and work are clearly identified in the title page of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Oh-Park, M., Holtzer, R., Mahoney, J. et al. Motor dual-task effect on gait and task of upper limbs in older adults under specific task prioritization: pilot study. Aging Clin Exp Res 25, 99–106 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-013-0014-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-013-0014-0