Introduction

Lagoons are considered one of the most important ecosystems globally [1–3]. They provide lots of ecosystem services and functions, including habitat and nursery sites for fish species, reference stations for a variety of migratory birds, and food and water sources for some human communities [2]. Their continual existence is recognised, therefore, as essential for the survival of many organisms, including humans [2, 3].

Most lagoons are polluted, mainly from anthropogenic waste input, because they lack proper watershed management strategies [1, 2, 4]. Among the major pollutants recorded in different lagoons around the world are heavy metals [4–6]. Heavy metals are very harmful, due to their [1, 2, 4] toxicity, persistence and deleterious impact on aquatic life and human health [5, 6]. Currently there are no well-established mechanisms to remove and eliminate heavy metals from the human body. The presence of heavy metals in aquatic systems such as lagoons, therefore, calls for greater concern [1, 2, 7].

Butuah Lagoon in New Takoradi in the Western Region of Ghana is one of the three significant lagoons in the Sekondi-Takoradi Metropolis [8, 9]. The Lagoon serves as a breeding ground for some marine species and is inhabited by a great diversity of species including the threatened fish species Sarotherodon melanotheron, Liza falcipinnis, Oreochromis niloticus, the crabs Callinectes amnicola, Goniopsis cruentata, and rear mangroves Rhizophora mangle, Laguncularia racemosa, Avicennia portulacastrum [9]. Butuah Lagoon is also a protected area for fishing with the majority of people in New Takoradi depending on it for their livelihood [8].

A substantial part of Butuah Lagoon is occupied by settlements and industries, which have led to the construction of several drainages, refuse dumps, defecating grounds, animal husbandry, and other intense activities such as fish landing sites around the lagoon [8, 9]. This has resulted in a large tract of wetland near the lagoon, which serves as a buffer zone against flood, which has been heavily polluted. High abundance of blue-green algae in the Lagoon, an indication of high levels of nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus, for example, has also been reported [9]. Similarly, the 26 September 2011 edition of the Ghana national paper, Daily Graphic, reported the death of more than 40,000 fishes in the lagoon with people who ate some of the fish sent to hospitals due to stomach running and dehydration. According to the Chronicle Newspaper of August 2 2012 fishing and farming activities in and around Butuah Lagoon were also recently banned by the Sekondi-Takoradi Metropolitan Assembly (STMA) due to pollution of the lagoon with paraquat toxicity.

Despite its importance and the threat it currently faces, research on the Butuah Lagoon is limited and no published study was found on the levels of heavy metals in the lagoon. The aim of this study was, therefore, to find out to what extent do the activities going on around the Lagoon affect its physical and chemical properties [1, 2, 7–9]. Specifically, the study is based on the following questions: (1) do the physicochemical properties of water from the Lagoon fall within the accepted range for aquatic life? (2) What is the level of Arsenic (As), Copper (Cu), Lead (Pb), Zinc (Zn), Iron (Fe), Cadmium (Cd) and Mercury (Hg) in the sediments, Tilapia fish and water from the Lagoon? (3) Do the concentrations of heavy metals recorded in the sediment and water samples differ among the sampling stations? and (4) what is the degree of heavy metal pollution in the sediment as indicated by assessment index? The study provides information that could help in the development of management strategies and create awareness to other stakeholders.

Materials and methods

Study area

Butuah Lagoon [8, 9] has an estimated area coverage of ~86,400 m2 and total area of natural boundary of ~423,500 m2 of which industrial activities and settlement cover ~9 % of the total area (Fig. 1) [9]. The industries include oil companies, wood processing companies, household utility manufacturing company, cocoa processing company, steel casting company, and a number of automobile fitting shops. The Lagoon has an equatorial climate as the metropolis in which it is located. The rainfall in the metropolis is bi-modal, with the major season occurring between March and July and the minor season occurring between August and November. The mean annual rainfall is about 1,380 mm, covering an average of 122 rainy days.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Map of Butuah Lagoon showing the three sampling points

Full size image

Sampling

Three sampling stations were randomly selected in the lagoon to collect samples of water and sediment. The sampling stations were within 04.90500°N, 001.74870°W (downstream), 04.91176°N, 001.75003°W (midstream) and 04.91522°N, 001.75355°W (upstream) (Fig. 1). Sampling was done once in a month, from December 2011 to March 2012. In situ measurement of temperature was done in each station during each sampling period using BRANNAN 76 mm Immersion Thermometer.

Tilapia fish (Oreochromis niloticus) samples were randomly collected from different parts of the lagoon. They were caught with mesh net. Water samples were collected from a mean depth of 50 cm with 500-mL acid-washed low-density polyethylene bottles from the three stations. Samples were collected at least 30 cm far from the border, from natural or artificial obstacles to avoid contamination. They were then acidified with 5.0 ml of 50 % HNO3. Sediment samples were collected with the aid of an Ekman Grab from at least 10 cm of the lagoon bed and stored in polyethylene bags. Samples (water, fish and sediments) were kept in ice chests at about 4 °C and transported to the laboratory for analysis. The samples were prepared in the laboratory for the physicochemical properties and heavy metal concentration determined.

Laboratory analysis

Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) and Conductivity (COND) were determined using the Conductivity Meter EH CLM 381 model; pH was determined using JENWAY 3505 pH Meter with accuracy of ±0.02 pH while the Mohr Method of Argentometric Titration was employed for the analysis of chloride (Chlor). The Partition Gravimetric Method was used in the determination of oil and grease, biological oxygen demand (BOD) was determined using the dilution method and chemical oxygen demand (COD) determined using the Open Reflux Method [10].

Sediment samples were air dried to a constant weight, and then ground and homogenized in a mortar to a fine powder and gently sieved. Fish samples were washed thoroughly with distilled water to remove debris and the muscles removed using a stainless steel knife. One gram of the homogenized sediment and fish samples were weighed into separate 50-ml digestion tube. Ten (10) ml of the diacid (HNO3–HClO4) in the ratio (9:4) was then added to each subsample. Each mixture was heated until the red NO2 fumes ceased and white fumes were produced. For the water samples, 100 ml of each were measured and transferred into separate digestion tubes. Ten (10) ml of 50 % HNO3 was added to each of the samples and then heated on a hot plate until white fumes were produced [11]. The digested samples were allowed to cool and were washed with distilled water and filtered for heavy metal analysis. Analysis of 10 subsamples from each sampling site was done for each month.

Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer (AAS 220 model) was used in determining the total concentrations of Pb, Cd, Cu, As, Fe and Zn while the Automatic Mercury Analyzer (Model HG 6000) equipped with a mercury lamp at a wavelength of 253.7 nm was used in determining the concentration of Hg. All samples for analysis were accompanied by blanks at one blank per 10 samples and replicate analyses were conducted on the samples to evaluate precision of the analytical techniques.

Assessment of sediment contamination

The degree of metal pollution in the sediment was assessed using the Enrichment Factor (EF) [12], Contamination factor (C f) and Modified degree of contamination (mC d) [13, 14], Tomlinson pollution load index (PLI) [15], and geo-accumulation index (I-geo) [16]. A pre-industrial baseline concentration of heavy metals for the area could not be obtained; therefore, the recommended composition of the upper continental crust by Rudnick, Gao [17] was used for all the index calculations.

Contamination factor (C f)

Contamination factor (C f) reflects the metal enrichment in the sediment as it accounts for the element based on the background (reference) concentration [13, 14]. It is calculated as the ratio of sediment metal content at a given station to the background metal concentration [14] as:

$$ C_{\text{f}} \, = \, \, M_{\text{x}} / \, M_{\text{b}} $$

where M x and M b refer to the mean concentration of pollutant in contaminated and pre-industrial ‘baseline’ sediments, respectively. Depending on the magnitude, C f is rated as ‘low’ (≤1), ‘moderate’ (1–3), ‘considerable’ (3–6), or ‘very high’ (>6) [14].

Modified degree of contamination (mC d)

The Modified degree of contamination (mC d) is a generalized form of the degree of contamination by Hakanson [14], which is the sum of all contamination factors (C f) for the lagoon. The mC d on the other hand divides the sum of all the C f’s for a given set of estuarine pollutants by the number of analysed pollutants [13]. Thus,

$$ mC_{\text{d}} \, = \,{{\left( {C_{\text{fi}} + \ldots ..C_{\text{fn}} } \right)} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\left( {C_{\text{fi}} + \ldots ..C_{\text{fn}} } \right)} n}} \right. \kern-0pt} n} $$

where C fi and C fn are the contamination factors of the ith and nth element (or pollutant) and n is number of analysed elements.

An estuarine sediment with mC d < 1.5 has nil to very low degree of contamination, 1.5 ≤ mC d < 2 low, 2 ≤ mC d < 4 moderate, 4 ≤ mC d < 8 high degree, 8 ≤ mC d < 16 very high, 16 ≤ mC d < 32 extremely high, and mC d ≥ 32 ultra-high degree of contamination [13].

Tomlinson pollution load index (PLI)

The PLI is a summative indication of the level of heavy metal pollution. It could be for a given sampling station (PLI) or for the entire estuary (PLIE). PLI is calculated from the C f of each of its constituent samples while PLIE from the PLI of each station [15].

$$ \begin{aligned} {\text{PLI}} & = (C_{\text{f1}} \times \, C_{\text{f2}} \times \, C_{\text{f3}} \times \cdots \times \, C_{{{\text{f}}n}} )^{ 1/n} \\ {\text{PLI}}_{\text{E}} & = \left( {{\text{PLI}}_{\text{station1}} \times {\text{ PLI}}_{\text{station2}} \times {\text{ PLI}}_{\text{station3}} \times \cdots \times {\text{ PLI}}_{\text{stationn}} } \right)^{ 1/n} \\ \end{aligned} $$

where n is the number of the constituent samples or station, C f is the contamination factor of the heavy metals at the stations, and PLIstationn is the PLI for sample stations n. PLI or PLIE value of zero indicates perfection, a value of one means only the baseline levels of pollutants are present, and values above one indicate progressive deterioration of the sample station or estuarine quality [15].

Enrichment factor (EF)

Enrichment factor (EF) was used to differentiate the metal source as anthropogenic or naturally occurring [12] as it normalizes measured heavy metal content with respect to a sample reference metal [12]. We used Fe as the reference metal as it usually has a relatively high natural concentration and does not usually get into estuarine sediments from anthropogenic sources. Enrichment factor was calculated as:

$$ {\text{EF}}\, = \,\left[ {{{\left( {M_{\text{x}} /{\text{Fe}}_{\text{x}} } \right)_{\text{sediment}} } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\left( {M_{\text{x}} /{\text{Fe}}_{\text{x}} } \right)_{\text{sediment}} } {\left( {M_{\text{b}} /{\text{Fe}}_{\text{b}} } \right)_{\text{earth's crust}} }}} \right. \kern-0pt} {\left( {M_{\text{b}} /{\text{Fe}}_{\text{b}} } \right)_{\text{earth's crust}} }}} \right] $$

where M x and Fex are the sediment sample concentrations of the heavy metal and Fe while M b and Feb are their concentrations in a suitable background or baseline reference material. EF of one implies no enrichment, <1 depletion, and >1 enriched relative to the average earth’s crust [12].

Geo-accumulation index (I geo)

Geo-accumulation index (I geo), which measures the enrichment of metal concentrations above background or baseline concentrations [16] was also used to assess the sediment quality as:

$$ I_{\text{geo}} = { \log }_{ 2} \left[ {{{C_{i} } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{C_{i} } {\left( { 1. 5B_{i} } \right)}}} \right. \kern-0pt} {\left( { 1. 5B_{i} } \right)}}} \right] $$

where C i is the measured concentration of the examined metal i in the sediment, and B i is the background or reference value of the metal i. A factor of 1.5 is used because of possible variations in background values for a given metal in the environment as well as very small anthropogenic influences. I geo ≤ 0, class 0, unpolluted; 0 < I geo ≤ 1, class 1, from unpolluted to moderately polluted; 1 < I geo ≤ 2, class 2, moderately polluted; 2 < I geo ≤ 3, class 3, from moderately to strongly polluted; 3 < I geo ≤ 4, class 4, strongly polluted; 4 < I geo ≤ 5, class 5, from strongly to extremely polluted; and I geo > 5, class 6, extremely polluted [16].

Statistical analysis

To determine if the concentrations of metals recorded in the sediment and water samples differed among the sampling stations, a Linear Mixed Model was applied. The concentration of the heavy metals was treated as the dependent variable while sampling station and dates of sampling were the independent variables. Sampling station was considered a fixed factor while date of sampling and their interaction were treated as random variables. The Bonferroni correction was used to determine the contrast between the three sampled stations. All the analyses were done in SPSS version 21, with the p value set at 0.05.

Results and discussion

Do the physicochemical properties of Butuah Lagoon fall within the accepted range for aquatic life?

The lagoon was slightly alkaline, with mean pH of 8.0 ± 0.2 (Table 1), which falls within the recommended range of 6.0–9.0 [18]. It had a fairly constant temperature with mean of 30.1 ± 0.1 °C suitable for tilapia production [19]. The electric conductivity of the Lagoon was higher than permissible for aquatic life, with a mean of 2667.3 ± 285.1 µS/cm [18, 20]. There was also a high level of total dissolved substance (TDS), with a mean of 1333.8 ± 142.6 mg/L, above the recommended level by the US EPA for aquatic life [18]. The results indicate increased levels in dissolved salts and inorganic materials in the lagoon [20, 21]. For example, the concentration of chloride in the Lagoon was very high with a mean of over 5000 mg/L (Table 1) which is above the maximum concentration of 1200 mg/L [37] and chronic toxicity tests indicate that aquatic organisms can adversely be affected at concentrations ranging from 735 to 4681 mg/L [39] even though sea water mixing could have accounted for the higher values recorded in the downstream and was positively correlated (p < 0.05) with conductivity, TDS and temperature (Table 2). These dissolved salts and inorganic materials may be from activities including the discharge of wastewater high in salts, brine waters from oil production activities and overuse of fertilizers [20, 21]. The dissolved substance might also be coming from the sea, as the lagoon is sometimes opened for a relatively short period of time during the rainy season [9].

Table 1 Mean values of physicochemical parameters measured from water sample along three randomly selected stations in Butuah Lagoon
Full size table
Table 2 Correlation coefficients of the physiochemical parameters measured from water sample of Butuah Lagoon
Full size table

The mean concentrations of BOD (80.5 ± 5.6 mg/L) during the sampling period was positively correlated with COD (239.47 ± 18.5 mg/L) (Table 2). Unpolluted waters typically have a BOD value of 2 mg/L while those receiving wastewaters may have values up to 10 mg/L or more [20]. The high BOD recorded in the current study is thus an indication of a large quantity of organic waste in the lagoon. This may possibly be from the numerous inputs of domestic wastewater and the increased dumping of refuse along the banks [9], particularly at the downstream, which recorded the highest values. High levels of BOD could result in reduced dissolved oxygen available for other aquatic organisms, which could lead to change in the ecological structure and dynamics of the benthic communities as high diversity of species are replaced with a few low-oxygen-tolerant organisms [22].

Mean oil and grease concentration was 31.5 ± 4.6 mg/L (Table 1) and was negatively correlated with temperature, BOD and all the other parameters (Table 2). The high concentration of oil and grease was not surprising as the industries around the lagoon include oil companies and automobile repair artisans and was above the recommended limits of 10 and 20 mg/L for freshwater and marine life, respectively [38]. Aquatic organisms, particularly at the juvenile life stages are likely to be affected by the presence of oil and grease. The oil layer formed could, for example, affect photosynthesis by decreasing light penetration, and decrease the amount of dissolved oxygen and temperature, which could affect the survival of several aquatic species. The effect could also include killing through coating, asphyxiation and contact poisoning [22].

What is the level of Cd, Pb, As, Zn, Fe, Hg, and Cu in water, sediment and fish samples from Butuah Lagoon?

The concentrations of heavy metals were compared against standards such as the Interim Freshwater Sediment Quality Guidelines (ISQG) of the Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment, United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), the Food Safety Authority of Ireland and the World Health Organization.

Cadmium (Cd)

Cadmium can mainly be found in the earth’s crust but concentration could increase through deposition of manures, phosphate fertilizer and sewage sludge into the Lagoon [23, 24]. Mean Cd concentration in the water (0.32 ± 0.005 mg/L) and sediment (5.0 ± 0.5 mg/kg) were above the standard compared [25, 26] (Tables 3, 4). The mean concentration in fish was, however, below the detectable limit, with the highest concentration of 0.97 mg/kg measured. [23, 24, 27].

Table 3 Results from Linear Mixed Model comparing concentration (mean ± standard error) of heavy metals in sediments and water of Butuah Lagoon at the three sampled stations
Full size table
Table 4 Contrasts from Linear Mixed Model comparing concentration of heavy metals in water and sediments of Butuah lagoon collected at three stations
Full size table

Lead (Pb)

The major anthropogenic sources of Pb are in lead–acid storage batteries particularly for motor vehicles and lead–akyl compounds added to petrol, non-ferrous metal smelting and refining, natural manufacturing processes and dumping of sewage sludge [24, 28].Mean concentrations of Pb in the water (0.244 ± 0.018 mg L) and sediment (39.2 ± 5.1 mg kg) were above the recommended levels for each medium [25, 26]. In both media the highest concentration of Pb was recorded at the midstream (Table 3). The mean concentrations recorded in fish (4.6 ± 0.6 mg/kg) was also above the level recommended for human consumption [29]. The proximity of the lagoon, particularly the midstream, to an industrial complex, auto mechanic shops and a large oil storage facility could explain the reason for the relatively higher levels of Pb recorded during the sampling period [30].

Arsenic (As)

The concentration of As in the sediment ranged between 51.07 and 120.37 mg/kg during the sampling period, and significantly differed among the stations (Tables 3, 4), with mean (84.7 ± 3.2 mg/kg) highly above the recommended level [25]. The range of As in the muscles of fish during the sampling period was between 1.93 and 8.13 mg/kg with mean of (5.0 ± 0.3 mg/kg) which was high above the provisional maximum tolerable daily intake [31]. The concentrations declined generally from December to March. Arsenic was not detected in water samples from the lagoon during the sampling period. The presence of wood processing companies around the lagoon may account for the high levels of As in the sediments as it is used as a wood preservative in pressure-treated wood [32].

Zinc (Zn)

Runoffs from farms that use Zn fertilizers and industrial discharges are among the major sources of Zn [24]. Mean concentrations of Zn in the water (0.22 ± 0.044 mg/L) and sediment (137.7 ± 17.8 mg/kg) were above the recommended level for aquatic organisms [25, 26]. The concentration in sediment was higher in the midstream (d.f. 2, 6, F = 15.6, p = 0.004) but did not differ among the stations for the water samples (d.f. 2, 30, F = 1.81, p = 0.181) (Tables 3, 4). The high concentrations of Zn in the water and sediment could be attributed to the presence of anthropogenic activities at the banks of the lagoon. Concentration in fish samples, on the other hand, during the sampling period ranged from 15.20 to 37.67 mg/kg, with a mean (25.6 ± 1.4 mg/kg) below the recommended level for human consumption [29].

Iron (Fe)

Mean concentration (0.80 ± 0.109 mg/L) of iron in the water was below the levels recommended for freshwater aquatic life but above domestic water supplies [26], with the upstream having the highest (Tables 3, 4). The concentration ranged between 1209.00 and 2147.30 mg/kg in the sediment (Tables 3, 4) and between 33.17 and 210.06 mg/kg in the fish. The concentrations of Fe could be attributed to background levels, as Fe-rich chlorite is commonly identified in subsurface estuarine and other marginal marine successions [33].

Mercury (Hg)

Samples of sediment collected for Hg recorded lower concentrations during the sampling period, with no Hg being detected during some sampling periods. The mean concentration (0.008 ± 0.001 mg/kg) was, therefore, below the highest concentration level recommended by Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment 2001 standards (Tables 3, 4). The concentration recorded in the fish samples was also far below the standard recommended by the Food Safety Authority of Ireland [34]. It ranged between 0.008 and 0.014 mg/kg, with the highest being recorded in February. Mercury was not detected in the water samples.

Copper (Cu)

The mean concentrations of Cu in the water (0.04 ± 0.003 mg/L), sediments (28.3 ± 4.1 mg/kg) and fish (2.1 ± 0.5 mg/kg) samples were below the various standards compared [25, 26, 29].

What is the degree of heavy metal pollution in the sediment as indicated by assessment index?

Enrichment factor (EF)

The enrichment factor values of the metals studied (based on Fe as the normalizing metal) are presented in Table 5. The highest EF value was recorded for Cd and was throughout the three stations, with midstream having the highest. This could be attributed to the fact that cadmium ions are known to be most mobile among other metals [35]. The lowest EF values for all stations were recorded for Hg. The EF values were all found to be >10 except for Hg at all the stations, indicating influence of anthropogenic activities at the stations. The sediments for the entire system show high anthropogenic inputs from the surrounding areas with the order of average EF values from the highest to the lowest being Cd > As > Pb > Zn > Cu > Hg (Table 5).

Table 5 Enrichment factor of heavy metals in the surface sediments of three stations of Butuah Lagoon with Fe as normalization element
Full size table

Contamination factor, degree of contamination and PLI

All stations were found to have a very high contamination of As and Cd while low contamination of Fe, Cu and Pb were observed in almost all the three stations (Table 6). For the entire lagoon, the contamination levels of As and Cd could be classified as very high; Cu, Zn, and Pb concentration could be categorized as moderate, while Fe and Hg could be considered as low concentration (Table 6). The modified degree of contamination (mC d) values indicate significant anthropogenic impact in all the sediments, with the midstream having an extremely high degree of contamination (Table 6). As also shown (Table 6), the midstream and downstream had pollution load indexes (PLI) > 1, indicating a deterioration of sediment quality. The entire lagoon also showed a progressive deterioration with PLIE of 1.32.

Table 6 Contamination factor, degree of contamination and Tomlinson’s pollution load index of heavy metals in the surface sediments of three stations of Butuah lagoon
Full size table

Geo-accumulation index

The geo-accumulation indexes varied from metal to metal for the different sampled stations (Table 7). Fe, Cu and Hg remain unpolluted in at least two of the sampled stations, suggesting that their concentration in the sediments is in background value. For the entire system the Igeo values calculated according to the Muller scale indicate that Cd was strongly to extremely polluted, As moderately to strongly polluted, Zn and Pb as unpolluted to moderately polluted, and Fe and Cu as unpolluted in the sediment (Table 7). The strong to extremely polluted nature of Cd is alarming as this has the potential to displace Zn from many zinc-coating enzymes [24]. The toxicological importance of As is partly due to its chemical similarity with phosphorous which means As can disrupt metabolic pathways involving the latter [36]. These will, therefore, have deleterious effects on humans who are exposed to such high levels.

Table 7 The Geo-accumulation Index (I geo) of heavy metals in the surface sediments of three stations of Butuah lagoon
Full size table

Conclusion

We assessed the pollution status of the Butuah Lagoon using different media within the ecosystem. The results obtained indicated higher physiochemical parameters of the lagoon including high TDS, BOD and oil and grease. Concentrations of Pb, Zn, As, Cd in sediments; Pb, Zn, Cd in water samples, and Pb in the muscle of the fish were higher than the permissible limits. The mean values recorded for heavy metals and the other physicochemical parameters along the Butuah Lagoon during the sampling indicated a general trend of anthropogenic pollution in and around the lagoon, particularly around the midstream.

Pollution in the Butuah Lagoon has varied consequences on the biodiversity and the numerous users of the lagoon. The rich biodiversity of the ecosystem could be reduced and some species even driven to local extinction. The potential for the heavy metals to biomagnify along the food chain also calls for serious concern due to the implications on human health. Heavy metals are known to cause damage to major organs in humans such as the kidney, heart, liver and brain upon chronic exposure. There is, therefore, the need to embark on periodic monitoring activities of the Lagoon and possible regular checks of the treatment systems of the surrounding industries that discharge waste into the lagoon. Public education of the significance of the lagoon is also needed. These measures will ensure the protection of the lagoon, its aquatic life and their human dependents. A comprehensive management plan for the protection of the Butuah Lagoon might help also prevent or reduce this pollution.

We took measurements for 4 months at three sampling stations. Future research could be longer, at least 6 months, with numerous sampling stations and other fish species to provide more information about the status of the lagoon. The assessment of heavy metals in the fish species could also be done using the gills, kidney and liver as these are potential sinks for heavy metals. This research goes a long way to provide valuable information that is missing. Fish, Tilapia especially is a very important ingredient in the Ghanaian meal. The results thus present the reader with information on the levels of heavy metals in the fish that is usually consumed. This information will also appeal to the wide audience and institutions responsible to regulate the introduction of waste into Lagoons knowing that the trend in levels of contamination varies at different climatic/environmental conditions.