Introduction

The worldwide use of herbicides is estimated at 0.8 kg H−1 (Hajisharafi and Shokouhfar 2009) and is raising annually (Brookesa et al. 2017), and this amount is used in agriculture, aquatic habitats, and forests for pest control and protection of human and animal health. However, increasing and excessive use of herbicides has endangered human health, has reverse effects on non-target creatures and pollutes water, soil, and air. Although aquatic ecosystems are not considered as the target environments for pesticides, these environments and their fauna are inadvertently exposed to negative effects of these toxins, and this has exposed aquatic ecosystems as the largest part of the natural environment to constant threats such as genetic and biodiversity limitations. Studies on toxicity of pesticides in non-target creatures such as fish are used as the basis in determining eco-toxicological hazards of pesticides for aquatic systems (Abdallah et al. 2008).

Because of high level of physiological contact with aquatic environment, aquatics are among creatures that are constantly exposed to various toxins that pollute aquatic ecosystems. Various toxins are introduced into the water resources through irrigation, rain and washing, and pollute the vital tissues (such as liver, kidney and the brain) of the body of aquatic animals (Shankar Murthy et al. 2013). Therefore, aquatic histopathological studies can have a major role in identifying the effects of one or more toxins on aquatics’ body and increase knowledge about the effect of pollutants on fish (Authman et al. 2015).

In addition to histopathological studies, assessment of the activity of certain enzymes, especially antioxidant enzymes, is highly important in determining the effect of toxins on the body of aquatics. Assessment of enzymatic activity in various animal tissues can be applied in the study of metabolic pathways and function of each tissue. Enzymological findings in human and animals are applicable in investigating metabolic disorders and cell and tissue damage caused by toxicity to various compounds (Velmurugan et al. 2008).

Scientifically known as Oncorhynchus mykiss, rainbow trout is a cold-water fish that lives in clear and oxygen-rich waters. This fish belongs to the Salmonidae family and Salmoniformes order (Lee and Donaldson 2001). Because of its high adaptability, it is already found in most freshwaters in the world. Rainbow trout is rich in unsaturated fats, which are essential to healthy nutrition, and therefore has a major role in human nutrition (Guler et al. 2017).

Roundup is one of the most widely used herbicides in the world and commonly known as a non-selective herbicide that is used in agricultural weed control, and resistance to these herbicides has increased due to the development of genetically modified agricultural produce (Cuhra et al. 2015). In aquatic environments, glyphosate has a half-life of 7–14 days (Giesy et al. 2000; Torretta et al. 2018). This toxin may be directly consumed by humans through intake of food, or introduced to human body via accumulation in the food chain. Thus, it is essential that efficacy of various herbicides be properly assessed in different climatic conditions and dominant soil characteristics in different areas to enable managing their use. Efficacy of herbicides is affected by many climatic factors such as intensity of light, temperature, relative humidity and soil characteristics including concentration and types of minerals (Mithila et al. 2008).

Since Roundup is a commonly used herbicide in agriculture and its excessive and uncontrolled use in farms poses a serious threat to aquatic and human health, the present study attempted to assess damaging effects of Roundup herbicide on rainbow trout by measuring biochemical factors (cerebral acetyl cholinesterase and liver catalase) and histopathological studies (gills, liver, and kidney tissues) as the most widely used biomarkers in assessing chronic concentrations of pollutants. The present study was designed in October 2017 at the Faculty of Natural Resources of Urmia University of Iran and was implemented at the Artemia and Aquaculture Institute of Urmia University of Iran.

Materials and methods

Fish procurement and adaptation

Following procurement of 630 pieces of rainbow trout (50 ± 2.5 g) (French, Aqualand), the fish were transferred to aquaculture laboratories of Urmia Lake Research Institute of Urmia University, and to adapt to laboratory conditions, they were kept in three 1000-l polyethylene tanks for 10 days. In this period, the fish were fed with growth food of trout (GFT1) commercial extruded nutrition pellets (Faradaneh, Shahrkord, Iran) (Table 1) based on standard feeding table (Hardy 2002). Fish storage tanks contained water in good physicochemical factors (15 ± 2 °C temperature, natural light period, 8 ± 1 mg l−1 oxygen, pH = 7±0.2, and hardness of 100–400 mg l−1 calcium carbonate) and 24-hour aeration.

Table 1 Nutritional composition of control diet

Determination of Roundup herbicide LC50

The LC50 of Roundup was found statically according to guideline No: 203 of Organization Economic Cooperation Development (OECD) (OECD 2001). At this stage, 360 pieces of rainbow trout were randomly divided into one control and three treatment groups (three replicas for control and each treatment) in a closed-circuit system, supplied with continuous aeration in 300-l fiberglass tanks (each tank containing 150-l water), and were, respectively, exposed to 1 ppm, 5 ppm, and 7 ppm concentrations of Roundup herbicide (Table 2) for 96 h. The water and Roundup herbicide concentrations were replaced in the test medium during the experiment period daily. During the experiment, dead fish in each treatment were counted and recorded and quickly removed from tanks. At the end of the period, LC50 of the herbicide was found by SPSS Probit test.

Table 2 Specifications of Roundup herbicide

Chronic toxicity effects of Roundup assay

After determining 96 h LC50 of Roundup, the experiment continued to examine the effect of chronic toxicity of this herbicide in rainbow trout tissues. So, 270 pieces of rainbow trout were divided into a control and two treatment groups (three replicas for control and each treatment) in a closed-circuit system in 300-l fiberglass tanks (each tank containing 150 l water) and were exposed to different amounts of Roundup herbicide for 28 days as follows (OECD 2001):

  • Group one Roundup herbicide concentration of one-fifth of 96 h LC50 (1 ppm)

  • Group two Roundup herbicide concentration of one-tenth of 96 h LC50 (0.5 ppm)

  • Group three Control group

During the study, all tanks were continuously aerated, the light required was supplied by fluorescent lamps, and photoperiod was 10 h light:14 h dark (Bonnet et al. 2007). During the experiment period, the water and Roundup herbicide concentrations were replaced daily. At the end of the experiment, 27 fish from each treatment (nine fish from each replicate) were randomly caught and anesthetized in a solution of clove powder (200 ppm), and then, samples were taken from gills, kidney, and liver tissues for histopathological tests, and after rinsing in saline, immediately placed in formalin 10% solution. Also, cerebral acetyl cholinesterase and liver catalase activities were measured using fish brain and liver samples isolated and kept at − 80 °C.

Histopathological test

Gills, kidney, and liver tissue samples were removed from formalin and dehydrated using a graded series of ethanol (ethanol 60% to absolute alcohol) and clarified using cedar oil (cedarwood oil) and xylol (dimethylbenzene). Samples were molded in liquid paraffin, and 5 micron sections prepared with microtome were placed on slides. Samples were stained hematoxylin–eosin, and then underwent histopathological assessments using an optical microscope equipped with camera. Histological changes of organs were evaluated semiquantitatively based on severity of the lesions. The alterations in gills, kidney, and liver organ were classified in progressive stages of damage to the tissue: stage I, which is normal tissue; stage II, which is severe and impairs the normal functioning of the tissue; and stage III, which is very severe and causes irreparable damage. A value of degree of tissue change (DTC) was calculated for each lesion by the formula: DTC = (1 × SI) + (10 × SII) + (100 × SIII) where I, II and III correspond to the number of alterations of stages I, II and III, respectively. DTC values between 0 and 10 indicate normal functioning of the organ; values between 11 and 50 indicate mild damage to the organ; values between 51 and 100 indicate moderate changes in the organ, and values above 100 indicate sever damage to the organ (Camargo and Martinez 2007).

Acetyl cholinesterase activity assay

The brain acetyl cholinesterase activity was measured using Ellman et al. (1961) method. Fish brain tissue samples were carefully weighed and 0.2 gr from each sample was added to 2 ml KCl 10% solution in the homogenizer and completely homogenized, and then centrifuged at 10000 rpm for 10 min, and supernatant (brain tissue extract) was separated. Brain tissue extract was poured into a 96-well microplate, 1000 µl of pyrophosphate solution was added to the wells containing the sample or the standard solution, and the resulting set was incubated at 37 °C for 3 min. Next, 250 µl of butyrylthiocholine solution was added to samples, and 2 min later, optical absorption of samples was read four times at one minute intervals using ELISA Reader (DANA, USA) at 405-nm wavelength. According to the guidelines, the brain acetyl cholinesterase activity was found by multiplying mean optical absorption difference between readings by 68500 (Ellman et al. 1961).

Liver catalase activity assay

Liver catalase activity was measured according to Modesto and Martinez method (2010). Samples of liver tissue were weighed and placed in homogenizer, and for every 0.2 g of sample, 2 ml of KCl 10% solution was added, and then fully homogenized. The resulting solution was centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 5 min, and supernatant (liver tissue extract) was separated.

A mixture of 1 ml of liver tissue extract and 0.5 ml of PBS solution (composed of 2.9 gr of \( {\text{Na}}_{2} {\text{HPO}}_{4} + 2{\text{H}}_{2} {\text{O}} \), 0.2 g of \( {\text{KH}}_{2} {\text{PO}}_{4} \), 8 g of NaCl, 0.2 g of KCl, and 1000 ml of distilled water, whose pH is controlled with HCl) was poured in the cuvette as blank (0.5 cm diameter and 3 ml volume), and its optical absorption was read at 0, 10, 20, 40, 60 s and 2 min at 240-nm wavelength using a spectrophotometer. Then, 100 ml of PBS solution was poured into a dark glass vessel, and 340 µl of H2O2 was added; 0.5 ml of this solution was poured into the cuvette (0.5 cm diameter and 3 ml volume), and then, 1 ml of liver tissue extract was added. Changes in absorption of H2O2 were read at 0, 10, 20, 40, 60 s and 2 min at 240-nm wavelength using a spectrophotometer. Based on guidelines, liver catalase activity was measured using the following equation:

$$ \begin{aligned} & \Delta A = A1 - A \\ & A1 = {\text{ Optical absorption after }}20\,\text{s} \\ & A2 = {\text{ Optical absorption after }}2\,\hbox{min} \\ & \Delta A{\text{ blank}}\, > \,\Delta A{\text{ sample}} \\ & {\text{Unite/ml}} = \left[ {\Delta A /\hbox{min} \,\left( {\text{blank}} \right) - \,} \right[\Delta A /\hbox{min} \left( {\text{sample}} \right)] \times {\text{d}}x /V(0.5\,{\text{ml}} \times 0.0436) \\ \end{aligned} $$

where ΔA, dx, and V denote changes in optical absorption, cuvette thickness, and final volume, respectively.

Statistical analysis

Normal distribution of data was assessed using Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Roundup herbicide LC50 was determined using Probit Analysis Test. Enzyme data were analyzed using one-way variance analysis (ANOVA), and mean values were compared according to Tukey test at 95% CI using SPSS-v20. The results obtained were presented as mean ± SD.

Results and discussion

Acute toxicity and 96 h LC50

In the present study, during adaptation of fish to experimental conditions and 96 h of test, acute toxicity of Roundup herbicides caused no mortality in the control group fish. Therefore, it can be concluded that during 96 h of acute toxicity test, only addition of Roundup herbicide can be the reason for fish mortality. Following the exposure of rainbow trout to 1 ppm, 5 ppm, and 7 ppm concentrations of Roundup for 96 h, mortality for different treatments was recorded, and numerical value of 96 h LC50 was determined to be 4.98 ppm using Probit Analysis Test of statistical software SPSS-v20 (Table 3). Gholami-seyedKalaei et al. (2013) assessed toxicity of malathion, carbaryl, and Roundup in Cyprinus carpio and reported Roundup herbicide 96 h LC50 as 6.75 ppm for Cyprinus carpio. This shows that different fish are affected differently by aquatic pollutants.

Table 3 Roundup herbicide 96 h LC50

Gill tissue histopathology

Microscopic examination of gills tissue in the control group fish (treatment three) 28 days after the experiment revealed no structural changes or abnormality (Fig. 1a). Meanwhile, gills of fish receiving 1 ppm of Roundup (treatment one) showed the following changes: adhesion and bending of secondary lamellae (Fig. 1b). Gills of fish receiving 0.5 ppm of Roundup (treatment two) showed changes such as separation of epithelium from the basement membrane in secondary lamellae, and clubbing of secondary lamellae (Fig. 1c). Accumulation of pollutants in the gills of fish increases osmotic pressure, and more water enters the gills; and to compensate for this, the number of cells increases in gill filaments and lamellae and the lamella adheres together to reduce epithelium contact with water, so that osmotic pressure can be maintained by reducing pollutants entering the gills (Bernet et al. 2004). Therefore, gills dysfunction due to pollutants is significantly associated with the fish health, and gills are considered a key indicator of water pollution. According to the present study results, chronic toxicity with Roundup herbicide caused bending of secondary lamellae, dilatation of blood vessels of gill filaments, separation of epithelium from basement membrane, clubbing and adhesion of secondary lamellae in rainbow trout gill tissue (Fig. 1, Table 4). Braz-Mota et al. (2015) exposed Colossoma macropomum to Roundup herbicide, and their results showed liver and gill disorders, DNA damage, and inhibition of brain cholinergic activity in this fish due to exposure to Roundup herbicide. They reported that fish exposed to concentrations of 50% and 75% of 96 h LC50 showed histopathological changes in gill tissue such as epithelial hyperplasia and hypertrophy of gill filaments, epithelial separation from basement membrane, aneurysm and rupture of epithelial lamellae, and mitochondrial-rich cell proliferation. The above study results are largely similar to those of the present study (Table 4). Rocha et al. (2015) studied proteomic response and histopathology of gills of guppy fish exposed to Roundup herbicide and reported that exposure to a concentration of 1.82 ppm changes the curvature of gill lamellae, and in some areas, hypertrophy and hyperplasia in gill lamella epithelium. In the present study, exposure of rainbow trout to Roundup herbicide concentrations of 1 ppm and 0.5 ppm caused similar damage to gill tissue (Fig. 1, Table 4).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Histopathological changes in rainbow trout gill exposed to chronic toxicity of Roundup herbicide. A section of gills with normal secondary lamellae L, in the control group (a); adhesion of secondary lamellae La, and bending of secondary lamellae Lb in gills of fish receiving 1 ppm of Roundup herbicide (b); and separation of epithelium from the basement membrane in secondary lamellae Lc, and clubbing of secondary lamellae Ld in gills of fish receiving 0.5 ppm of Roundup herbicide (c) (mag × 40; H and E staining)

Table 4 Comparison of severity of tissue damage in gills, kidney, and liver in different Roundup herbicide chronic toxicity treatments

Kidney tissue histopathology

Microscopic examination of kidney tissue in the control group fish (treatment three) 28 days after the experiment revealed no structural changes or abnormality (Fig. 2a), while in fish receiving 1 ppm of Roundup herbicide (treatment one) tissue changes appeared as dilatation of Bowman’s capsule space, and glomerular wrinkling (Fig. 2b). In fish receiving 0.5 ppm of Roundup herbicide (treatment two), tissue changes occurred as glomerular cell swelling, and dilatation of Bowman’s capsule space (Fig. 2c). Kidneys are constantly exposed to toxins due to their key role in maintaining hemostasis of the fish body, receiving large amounts of blood, and excreting metabolites resulting from toxins; therefore, they are considered an important target organ for many environmental pollutants (Au 2004). According to the present study results, the effects of chronic toxicity of Roundup herbicide on rainbow trout kidney tissue caused such complications as glomerular wrinkling, dilatation of Bowman’s capsule space, cloudy swelling in proximal tubule, and dilatation of glomerular space (Fig. 2, Table 4). Jiraungkoorskul et al. (2002) studied histopathological effects of Roundup herbicide on the Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) and reported that exposure to 46.9 ppm, 44.4 ppm, 40 ppm, and 36.8 ppm concentrations of Roundup herbicide after 24, 48, 72, and 96 h caused changes such as dilatation of Bowman’s capsule space, glomerular shrinkage, pyknosis, separation of epithelium from tubules, broadening of vacuoles, necrosis in some cells, and cellular swelling in kidney tissue. In the present study, Roundup herbicide caused similar damage to kidney tissue in rainbow trout (Fig. 2, Table 4). In their in vitro and field study, Samanta et al. (2016) investigated the effects of Roundup herbicide on the kidneys of Heteropneustes fossilis and reported that in vitro conditions, Roundup herbicide causes necrosis in epithelial cells, fragmentation of endoplasmic network, damage to glomerular, distal and proximal tubules, vacuolation of epithelial cells in kidney tubules, and loss of kidney’s hematopoietic tissue. These results are largely similar to those obtained in the present study.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Histopathological changes in rainbow trout kidney exposed to chronic toxicity of Roundup herbicide. Glomerulus G, Bowman’s capsule B, Bowman’s capsule space K, proximal tubule P, and distal tubule D in all control group fish (a). Dilatation of Bowman’s capsule space Bs, and glomerular wrinkling Gh in all fish receiving 1 ppm of Roundup herbicide (b). Glomerular cell swelling Gt, and dilatation of Bowman’s capsule space Bs in fish receiving 0.5 ppm of Roundup herbicide (c) (mag × 40; H and E staining)

Liver tissue histopathology

Microscopic examination of liver tissue in the control group fish (treatment three) 28 days after the experiment revealed no structural changes or abnormality (Fig. 3A), while in fish receiving 1 ppm of Roundup herbicide (treatment one), tissue changes appeared as lipid degeneration in cytoplasm and pyknosis (Fig. 3b). In the liver of fish receiving 0.5 ppm of Roundup herbicide (treatment two), tissue changes were also in the form of lipid degeneration in cytoplasm and pyknosis (Fig. 3c). Liver is prone to chemical damage due to its key metabolic features, bile production, vitellogenesis, and biological transfers such as secretion of organic and non-organic pollutants and high sensitivity to pollutants; it is therefore an appropriate organ for studying the effect of environmental stimuli in animals. Hence, change in the structure of liver has a major role in the evaluation of fish health (Boran et al. 2010). According to the present study results, chronic toxicity of Roundup herbicide causes complications such as: cloudy swelling of cytoplasm, lipid degeneration in cell cytoplasm, necrosis, pyknosis of nucleus, and vascular hyperemia in liver tissue in rainbow trout (Fig. 3, Table 4). Do Carmo Langiano and Martinez (2008) studied the effect of toxicity of Roundup herbicide on Prochilodus lineatus fish and reported that 24-h exposure of fish to 10 ppm concentration of Roundup herbicide caused many pathological changes in the liver, and the most common of these changes included cytoplasmic and hepatocyte nucleus changes, decreased bile, hyperemia, increased blood flow in the liver, cytoplasmic vacuolation of hepatocytes, and hypertrophy of hepatocytes. As shown in Fig. 3 and Table 4, in the present study, 1 ppm and 0.5 ppm concentrations of Roundup herbicide caused many liver tissue damages in rainbow trout (Table 4). In their in vitro study, Samanta et al. (2016) investigated toxic effects of Roundup herbicide on liver, gill, and kidney of Heteropneustes fossilis fish and reported that this herbicide causes pyknosis of nucleus of liver cells, cytoplasmic vacuolation of liver cells, fat deposition in hepatocytes, necrosis of liver cell nucleus, and liver cell swelling. These results largely concur with the present study results. Table 4 shows the comparison of severity of tissue damages in gills, kidney, and liver in different treatments.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Histopathological changes in rainbow trout liver exposed to chronic toxicity of Roundup herbicide. Hepatocytes Hc and cirrhosis S1 in the control group fish (a). Lipid degeneration in cytoplasm V and pyknosis P in all fish receiving 1 ppm of Roundup herbicide (b). Lipid degeneration in cytoplasm V and pyknosis P in all fish receiving 0.5 ppm of Roundup herbicide (c) (mag × 40; H and E staining)

Cerebral acetyl cholinesterase and liver catalase activities

Cerebral acetyl cholinesterase and liver catalase activities in treatment 1 and 2 in chronic toxicity significantly decreased compared to the control (P < 0.05). It should be noted that cerebral acetyl cholinesterase activity in fish receiving treatment one (2275 ± 73 U L−1) and liver tissue catalase activity in fish receiving treatment two (4.07 ± 0.83 U ml−1) showed significantly greater decrease compared to the control group (P < 0.05) (Table 5). Acetyl cholinesterase (ACHE) is an enzyme that breaks down acetylcholine into choline and acetic acid. Acetylcholine is found in central and peripheral nervous system, neuromuscular synapses, and red blood cells. Inhibition of acetyl cholinesterase leads to increased acetylcholine in synaptic space (O’brien 1976) and may overstimulate cholinergic nerves, which can lead to behavior change, tremor, loss of balance, and ultimately death of the aquatic creature (Uner et al. 2006). In the present study, cerebral acetyl cholinesterase activity of rainbow trout exposed to 1 ppm and 0.5 ppm concentrations of Roundup herbicide decreased compared to control treatment (Table 5), such that 28 days after experiment, in 1 ppm treatment, activity of this enzyme showed greater decrease. Gholami-Seyedkolaei et al. (2013) studied the effect of Roundup herbicide on common carp (Cyprinus carpio) by assessing acetyl cholinesterase activity, blood, and serum biochemical parameters and reported that acetyl cholinesterase activity reduced in fish exposed to concentrations of 1.4 ppm of this herbicide. These results agree with those of the present study. Braz-Mota et al. (2015) reported inhibition of cerebral acetyl cholinesterase activity in Amazon bony fish (Colossoma macropomum) exposed to 1.2 and 2.3 of 96-h LC50 concentrations of Roundup herbicide for 96 h.

Table 5 Cerebral acetyl cholinesterase and liver catalase activities in different treatments of Roundup herbicide chronic toxicity (mean ± SD)

Harmful effects of free radicals are neutralized through protective system of cellular antioxidants including catalase (CAT), and superoxide dismutase (SOD) (Limon-Pacheco and Gonsebatt 2009). Superoxide dismutase (SOD) converts superoxide radical into H2O2, and catalase (CAT) reacts to and neutralizes toxicity of H2O2 by turning it into water and oxygen molecules (Mates et al. 1999). The imbalance between production of free radicals and antioxidant system in the body is referred to as oxidative stress, which is the cause of many diseases (Limon-Pacheco and Gonsebatt 2009). In the present study, liver catalase activity reduced compared to control treatment in rainbow trout exposed to 1 ppm and 0.5 ppm concentrations of Roundup herbicide for 28 days, such that catalase activity in fish treated with 0.5 ppm Roundup showed greater decrease after 28 days exposure. In a study conducted by Do Carmo Langiano and Martinez (2008), Roundup concentration of 10 ppm reduced liver catalase activity compared to the control group in Prochilodus lineatus fish, which largely agrees with the present study results.

Lushchak et al. (2009) investigated low toxicity Roundup herbicide that causes oxidative stress in goldfish (Carassius auratus) and reported increased liver catalase activity in fish exposed to Roundup concentrations of 2.5 ppm and 5 ppm compared to the control group. Cell exposure to oxidative stress induces antioxidant enzymes (catalase CAT and superoxide dismutase SOD). CAT and SOD enzymes act in synergy and form a set of mutual protective enzymes, and increased activity of these enzymes indicates compatibility of cell or tissue with the stress (John et al. 2001). In the present study, liver catalase activity reduced compared to the control group. According to the results of the present study, following the Roundup acute toxicity test for rainbow trout, 96 h LC50 was 4.97 ppm (Table 3), and in chronic concentration, maximum concentration causing chronic toxicity, tissue damage (Table 4), negative effect on cerebral acetyl cholinesterase, and liver catalase activities (Table 5) was 1 ppm.

Conclusion

Uncontrolled use of various agricultural toxins introduces large amounts of these toxins to land and aquatic ecosystems and affects wide ranges of plants and animals living in them. Since most aquatic creatures like fish are cold-blooded and have an extensive physiological contact with their habitat, they are very sensitive to pollutions caused by agricultural toxins and suffer from acute or chronic toxicity, depending on the amount of pollution. Therefore, according of the results of the present study, concentrations of Roundup lower than acute that are considered ineffective and permissible for non-target species can induce chronic toxicity in gill, kidney, and liver tissues of rainbow trout and change cerebral acetyl cholinesterase and liver catalase activities in this fish. The above tissue and enzymatic changes can be used as biomarkers for habitat pollution of fish and other aquatics with glyphosate. Therefore, it is suggested to apply histopathological and enzymatic studies of the antioxidant system of fish to achieve the correct and safe pattern application of herbicides in agricultural fields and less damage to aquatic ecosystems.