Abstract
In this paper, we present some Lyapunov-type inequalities for a nonlinear fractional heat equation with nonlocal boundary conditions depending on a positive parameter. As an application, we obtain a lower bound for the eigenvalues of corresponding equations.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Consider the boundary value problem with Dirichlet conditions
where \(q:[a,b]\rightarrow \mathbb {R}\) is a continuous function. Lyapunov in [1] proved that if Problem (1) has a nontrivial solution then
In [2], Hartman and Wintner proved that if Problem (1) has a nontrivial solution then
where \(q^{+}(s)=\max \{q(s),0\}\).
Inequalities of this type have appeared in the literature for other classes of boundary value problems and we refer the reader to [3,4,5,6,7] and the references therein for more details.
Recently, some Lyapunov-type inequalities have been obtained by some authors for different fractional boundary value problems (see [8,9,10,11,12], for example).
In this paper, we are concerned with the problem of finding some Lyapunov-type inequalities for the following fractional boundary value problem
where \(^{C}\!D_{a}^{\alpha }\) denotes the Caputo fractional derivative of order \(\alpha \), \(1<\alpha \le 2\), \(\beta >0\) and \(a\le \eta \le b\).
As an application of our results, we obtain a lower bound for the eigenvalues of the cor-respondig problem.
The above mentioned fractional boundary value problem can be considered as the fractional version of the nonlocal boundary value problem
with \(0\le \eta \le 1\) which has been studied in the special case with \(\eta =0\) in [13] and this problem models a thermostat insulated at \(t=0\) with a controller dissipating heat at \(t=1\) depending on the temperature detected by a sensor at \(t=\eta \).
2 Background
In this section, we present the basic results about fractional calculus theory which be used later. For more details, we refer the reader to [14, 15].
Definition 1
Let \(f:[a,b]\longrightarrow \mathbb {R}\) be a given function. For \(\alpha >0\), the Riemann-Liouville fractional integral of order \(\alpha \) of f is defined by
where \(\Gamma (\alpha )\) denotes the classical gamma function.
Definition 2
Let \(f:[a,b]\longrightarrow \mathbb {R}\) be a given function. For \(\alpha >0\), the Caputo derivative of fractional order \(\alpha >0\) of f is given by
where \(n=[\alpha ]+1\) and \([\alpha ]\) denotes the integer part of \(\alpha \).
Lemma 1
Suppose that \(f\in C(a,b)\cap L^{1}(a,b)\) with a fractional derivative of order \(\alpha >0\) belonging to \(C(a,b)\cap L^{1}(a,b)\). Then
for \(t\in [a,b]\), where \(c_{i}\in \mathbb {R}\,\,(i=0,1,\ldots ,n-1)\) and \(n=[\alpha ]+1\).
Lemma 2
Suposse \(f\in L^{1}(a,b)\) and \(\alpha >0\), \(\beta >0\). Then
-
1.
\(^{C}\!D_{a}^{\alpha }I_{a}^{\alpha }f(t)=f(t)\)
-
2.
\(I_{a}^{\alpha }(I_{a}^{\beta })f(t)=(I_{a}^{\alpha +\beta }f)(t)\)
3 Main results
Our starting point in this section is the following lemma which gives us an expression for the Green’s function of the boundary value problem (2). The case for \(a=0\) and \(b=1\) appears in [16, Lemma 2.4].
Lemma 3
Suppose \(y\in C[a,b]\). A function \(u\in C[a,b]\) is a solution of Problem (2) if and only if it satisfies the integral equation
where G(t, s) is the Green’s function given by
where for \(r\in [a,b]\), \(H_{r}:[a,b]\rightarrow \mathbb {R}\) is the function defined as
Proof
Using Lemma 2, we have
for some constants \(c_{0},c_{1}\in \mathbb {R}\).
This gives us
From the boundary condition \(u'(a)=0\), we get \(c_{1}=0\).
This gives us
By using the fact that \(^{C}\!D_{a}^{\alpha -1}c_{0}=0\), and Lemma 2, we have
This gives us
Taking into account the boundary condition
we have
and, from this, it follows
Consequently,
Therefore,
or, equivalently,
This completes the proof. \(\square \)
Remark 1
Notice that the Green’s function can be expressed as
In the following proposition, we present some properties about Green’s function
Proposition 1
The Green’s function satisfies:
-
(i)
\(\max \{G(t,s):t,s\in [a,b]\}=\beta +\dfrac{(\eta -a)^{\alpha -1}}{\Gamma (\alpha )}\).
-
(ii)
\(\min \{G(t,s):t,s\in [a,b]\}=\beta -\dfrac{(b-\eta )^{\alpha -1}}{\Gamma (\alpha )}\).
Proof
-
(i)
Notice that for \(s\in [a,b]\) fixed, we have
$$\begin{aligned} \frac{\partial G}{\partial t}(t,s)= {\left\{ \begin{array}{ll} 0,&{}\quad \text {for}\,\,a\le t\le s, \\ -\dfrac{(\alpha -1)(t-s)^{\alpha -2}}{\Gamma (\alpha )},&{}\quad \text {for}\,\,a\le t\le s\le b. \end{array}\right. } \end{aligned}$$From this, it follows that G(t, s) is a decreasing function in t, and this gives us
$$\begin{aligned}&\max \{G(t,s):t,s\in [a,b]\}=G(a,s)\nonumber \\&\quad = {\left\{ \begin{array}{ll} \beta +\dfrac{(\eta -s)^{\alpha -1}}{\Gamma (\alpha )},&{}\quad \text {for}\,\,a\le s\le \eta \le b,\\ \beta , &{}\quad \text {for}\,\,a\le \eta \le s\le b. \end{array}\right. } \end{aligned}$$On the other hand, if we put \(\varphi (s)=\beta +\frac{(\eta -s)^{\alpha -1}}{\Gamma (\alpha )}\) for \(s\in [a,\eta ]\), since \(\varphi '(s)=-\frac{(\alpha -1)(\eta -s)^{\alpha -2}}{\Gamma (\alpha )}<0\), \(\varphi \) is a decreasing function and we infer that \(\max \{\varphi (s):s\in [a,\eta ]\}=\varphi (a)=\beta +\frac{(\eta -a)^{\alpha -1}}{\Gamma (\alpha )}\). Therefore,
$$\begin{aligned} \max \{G(t,s):t,s\in [a,b]\}=\max \left\{ \beta ,\beta +\frac{(\eta -a)^{\alpha -1}}{\Gamma (\alpha )}\right\} =\beta +\frac{(\eta -a)^{\alpha -1}}{\Gamma (\alpha )} \end{aligned}$$and this proves (i).
-
(ii)
Since G(t, s) is a decreasing function in t, we have
$$\begin{aligned}&\min \{G(t,s):t,s\in [a,b]\}=G(b,s)\nonumber \\&\quad = {\left\{ \begin{array}{ll} \beta +\dfrac{(\eta -s)^{\alpha -1}}{\Gamma (\alpha )}-\dfrac{(b-s)^{\alpha -1}}{\Gamma (\alpha )}, &{}\quad \text {for}\,\,a\le s\le \eta \le b,\\ \beta -\dfrac{(b-s)^{\alpha -1}}{\Gamma (\alpha )}, &{}\quad \text {for}\,\,a\le \eta \le s\le b. \end{array}\right. } \end{aligned}$$Put \(\psi (s)=\beta -\frac{(b-s)^{\alpha -1}}{\Gamma (\alpha )}\) for \(s\in [\eta ,b]\). Since \(\psi '(s)=\frac{(\alpha -1)(b-s)^{\alpha -2}}{\Gamma (\alpha )}\ge 0\), \(\psi \) is a nondecreasing, and, consequently, \(\min \{\psi (s):s\in [\eta ,b]\}=\psi (\eta )=\beta -\frac{(b-\eta )^{\alpha -1}}{\Gamma (\alpha )}\). On the other hand, put \(\alpha (s)=\beta +\frac{(\eta -s)^{\alpha -1}}{\Gamma (\alpha )} -\frac{(b-s)^{\alpha -1}}{\Gamma (\alpha )}\) for \(s\in [a,\eta ]\), since \(\alpha '(s)=-\frac{(\alpha -1)(\eta -s)^{\alpha -2}}{\Gamma (\alpha )} +\frac{(\alpha -1)(b-s)^{\alpha -2}}{\Gamma (\alpha )}=\frac{(\alpha -1)}{\Gamma (\alpha )} \left[ (b-s)^{\alpha -2}-(\eta -s)^{\alpha -2}\right] \le 0\), (because \(1<\alpha \le 2\)), \(\alpha \) is decreasing on \([a,\eta ]\) and, therefore, \(\min \{\alpha (s):s\in [a,\eta ]\}=\alpha (\eta )=\beta -\frac{(b-\eta )^{\alpha -1}}{\Gamma (\alpha )}\). These facts say us that
$$\begin{aligned} \min \{G(t,s):t,s\in [a,b]\}=\beta -\frac{(b-\eta )^{\alpha -1}}{\Gamma (\alpha )} \end{aligned}$$and this completes the proof.
\(\square \)
Remark 2
Notice that if \(\beta \Gamma (\alpha )\ge (b-\eta )^{\alpha -1}\) then \(G(t,s)\ge 0\).
In the case \(\beta \Gamma (\alpha )<(b-\eta )^{\alpha -1}\) then, since
we have that
Our main result is the following Lyapunov-type inequality.
Theorem 1
Suppose that the fractional boundary value problem
with \(1<\alpha \le 2\), \(\beta >0\), \(a\le \eta \le b\) and \(\beta \ge \frac{(b-\eta )^{\alpha -1}}{\Gamma (\alpha )}\), where \(q:[a,b]\rightarrow \mathbb {R}\) is a continuous function, has a nontrivial continuous solution then
Proof
Consider the Banach space \(C[a,b]=\{x:[a,b]\rightarrow \mathbb {R}:x\,\,\text {continuous}\}\) with the standard norm \(\Vert x\Vert _{\infty }=\max \{|x(t)|:a\le t\le b\}\), for \(x\in C[a,b]\).
By Lemma 3,
where G(t, s) is the Green’s function appearing in Lemma 3.
Using Remark 2, since \(\beta \ge \frac{(b-\eta )^{\alpha -1}}{\Gamma (\alpha )}\), \(G(t,s)\ge 0\) and, moreover \(\max \{G(t,s):t,s\in [a,b]\}=\beta +\frac{(\eta -a)^{\alpha -1}}{\Gamma (\alpha )}\), we infer, for any \(t\in [a,b]\),
and, this gives us
Since the solution u is nontrivial, we get
and this gives us the desired result. \(\square \)
Theorem 1 gives us the following corollary.
Corollary 1
Suppose that the boundary value problem
where \(\beta >0\), \(a\le \eta \le b\) and \(\beta \ge (b-\eta )\) and \(q:[a,b]\rightarrow \mathbb {R}\) is a continuous function, has a nontrivial continuous solution then
Proof
Apply Theorem 1 for \(\alpha =2\). \(\square \)
4 Application
In this section, we present some applications of the results obtained in Sect. 3 to eigenvalue problem.
\(\lambda \in \mathbb {R}\) is said to be an eigenvalue of the fractional boundary value problem
where \(1<\alpha \le 2\), \(\beta >0\) and \(a\le \eta \le b\) if Problem (3) has at least a nontrivial continuous solution \(x_{\lambda }\). In this case, we say that \(x_{\lambda }\) is an eigenvector associated to the eigenvalue \(\lambda \).
Corollary 2
Under assumption \(\beta \ge \frac{(b-\eta )^{\alpha -1}}{\Gamma (\alpha )}\) and suppose that \(\lambda \) is an eigenvalue of Problem (3) then
Proof
As \(\lambda \) is an eigenvalue of Problem (3), this means that Problem (3) has a nontrivial continuous solution \(x_{\lambda }\) and, by using Theorem 1, we have
Therefore,
which yields the desired result. \(\square \)
Corollary 3
Suppose that \(\lambda \) is an eigenvalue of the ordinary boundary value problem
where \(\beta >0\), \(a\le \eta \le b\) and \(\beta \ge (b-a)\), then
Proof
Since \(\lambda \) is an eigenvalue of Problem (4), this says that Problem (4) admits a nontrivial continuous solution \(x_{\lambda }\). Now, by using Corollary 1, we get
This gives us the desired result. \(\square \)
References
Lyapunov, A.M.: Probléme général de la stabilité du mouvement. Ann. Fac. Sci. Univ. Tolouse 2, 203–407 (1907)
Hartman, P., Wintner, A.: On an oscillation criterion of Lyapunov. Am. J. Math. 73, 885–890 (1951)
Brown, R.C., Hilton, D.B.: Opial’ inequality and oscillation of 2nd order equations. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 125, 1123–1129 (1997)
Çakmak, D.: Lyapunov-type integral inequalities for certain higher order differential equations. Appl. Math. Comput. 216, 368–373 (2010)
Lee, C., Yeh, C., Hong, C., Argarwal, R.P.: Lyapunov and Wirtinger inequalities. Appl. Math. Lett. 17, 847–853 (2004)
Pachpatte, B.G.: On Lyapunov-type inequalities for certain higher order differential equations. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 195, 527–536 (1995)
Yang, X., Lo, K.: Lyapunov-type inequality for a class of even-order differential equations. Appl. Math. Comput. 215, 3884–3890 (2010)
Ferreira, R.A.C.: A Lyapunov-type inequality for a fractional boundary value problem. Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal. 16, 978–984 (2013)
Ferreira, R.A.C.: On a Lyapunov-type inequality and the zeros of a certain Mittag-Leffler function. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 412, 1058–1063 (2014)
Jleli, M., Samet, B.: Lyapunov-type inequalities for a fractional differential equation with mixed boundary conditions. Math. Inequal. Appl. 18, 443–451 (2015)
O’Regan, D., Samet, B.: Lyapunov-type inequalities for a class of fractional differential equations. J. Inequal. Appl. 2015, 247 (2015)
Rong, J., Bai, C.: Lyapunov-type inequality for a fractional differential equation with fractional boundary conditions. Adv. Differ. Eq. 2015, 82 (2015)
Guidotti, P., Merino, S.: Gradual loss of positivity and hidden invariant cones in a scalar heat equation. Diff. Integr. Equ. 13, 1551–1568 (2000)
Kilbas, A.A., Srivastava, H.M., Trujillo, J.J.: Theory and Applications of Fractional Differential Equations, North Holland Mathematics Studies, vol. 204. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2006)
Podlubny, I.: Fractional Differential Equations. Academic, San Diego (1999)
Nieto, J.J., Pimentel, J.: Positive solutions of a fractional thermostat model. Bound. Value Probl. 2013, 5 (2013)
Acknowledgements
The third author was partially supported by the Project MTM 2013–44357–P.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cabrera, I.J., Rocha, J. & Sadarangani, K.B. Lyapunov type inequalities for a fractional thermostat model. RACSAM 112, 17–24 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-016-0362-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-016-0362-7