Abstract
Extending an earlier study, the best track minimum sea level pressure (MSLP) data are assimilated for landfalling Hurricane Ike (2008) using an ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF), in addition to data from two coastal ground-based Doppler radars, at a 4-km grid spacing. Treated as a sea level pressure observation, the MSLP assimilation by the EnKF enhances the hurricane warm core structure and results in a stronger and deeper analyzed vortex than that in the GFS (Global Forecast System) analysis; it also improves the subsequent 18-h hurricane intensity and track forecasts.
With a 2-h total assimilation window length, the assimilation of MSLP data interpolated to 10-min intervals results in more balanced analyses with smaller subsequent forecast error growth and better intensity and track forecasts than when the data are assimilated every 60 minutes. Radar data are always assimilated at 10-min intervals.
For both intensity and track forecasts, assimilating MSLP only outperforms assimilating radar reflectivity (Z) only. For intensity forecast, assimilating MSLP at 10-min intervals outperforms radar radial wind (V r) data (assimilated at 10-min intervals), but assimilating MSLP at 60-min intervals fails to beat V r data. For track forecast, MSLP assimilation has a slightly (noticeably) larger positive impact than V r(Z) data. When V r or Z is combined with MSLP, both intensity and track forecasts are improved more than the assimilation of individual observation type.
When the total assimilation window length is reduced to 1 h or less, the assimilation of MSLP alone even at 10-min intervals produces poorer 18-h intensity forecasts than assimilating V r only, indicating that many assimilation cycles are needed to establish balanced analyses when MSLP data alone are assimilated; this is due to the very limited pieces of information that MSLP data provide.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Benjamin, S. G., and P. A. Miller, 1990: An alternative sea level pressure reduction and a statistical comparison of geostrophic wind estimates with observed surface winds. Mon. Wea. Rev., 118(10), 2099–2116.
Cangialosi, J. P., and J. L. Franklin, 2011: National Hurricane Center Forecast Verification Report, 77 pp.
Chen, Y. S., and C. Snyder, 2007: Assimilating vortex position with an ensemble Kalman filter. Mon. Wea. Rev., 135(5), 1828–1845.
Dong, J. L., and M. Xue, 2013: Assimilation of radial velocity and reflectivity data from coastal WSR-88D radars using an ensemble Kalman filter for the anal ysis and forecast of landfalling Hurricane Ike (2008). Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 139(671), 467–487.
Du, N. Z., M. Xue, K. Zhao, et al., 2012: Impact of assimilating airborne Doppler radar velocity data using the ARPS 3DVAR on the analysis and prediction of Hurricane Ike (2008). J. Geophy. Res., 117, D18113, doi: 10.1029/2012JD017687.
Emanuel, K. A., 2005: Divine Wind: The History and Science of Hurricanes. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 296 pp.
Fovell, R. G., K. L. Corbosiero, and H. C. Kuo, 2009: Cloud microphysics impact on hurricane track as revealed in idealized experiments. J. Atmos. Sci., 66(6), 1764–1778.
1 —, —, A. Seifert, et al., 2010: Impact of cloud-radiative processes on hurricane track. Geoph. Res. Lett., 37, L07808, doi: 10.1029/2010GL042691.
Hamill, T. M., J. S. Whitaker, M. Fiorino, et al., 2011: Global ensemble predictions of 2009’s tropical cyclones initialized with an ensemble Kalman filter. Mon. Wea. Rev., 139(2), 668–688.
Houze, R. A., Jr., S. S. Chen, B. F. Smull, et al., 2007: Hurricane intensity and eyewall replacement. Science, 315(5816), 1235–1239.
Huang, X.-Y., 2000: Variational analysis using spatial filters. Mon. Wea. Rev., 128(7), 2588–2600.
Jung, Y. S., G. F. Zhang, and M. Xue, 2008: Assimilation of simulated polarimetric radar data for a convective storm using the ensemble Kalman filter. Part I: Observation operators for reflectivity and polarimetric variables. Mon. Wea. Rev., 136(6), 2228–2245.
—, M. Xue, and M. J. Tong, 2012: Ensemble Kalman filter analyses of the 29–30 May 2004 Oklahoma tornadic thunderstorm using one- and two-moment bulk microphysics schemes, with verification against polarimetric radar data. Mon. Wea. Rev., 140(5), 1457–1475.
Kurihara, Y., R. E. Tuleya, and M. A. Bender, 1998: The GFDL hurricane prediction system and its performance in the 1995 hurricane season. Mon. Wea. Rev., 126(5), 1306–1322.
Lin, Y.-L., R. D. Farley, and H. D. Orville, 1983: Bulk parameterization of the snow field in a cloud model. J. Climate Appl. Meteor., 22(6), 1065–1092.
Pu, Z. X., and S. A. Braun, 2001: Evaluation of bogus vortex techniques with four-dimensional variational data assimilation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 129(8), 2023–2039.
—, X. L. Li, and J. Z. Sun, 2009: Impact of airborne Doppler radar data assimilation on the numerical simulation of intensity changes of Hurricane Dennis near a landfall. J. Atmos. Sci., 66(11), 3351–3365.
Purser, R. J., W.-S. Wu, D. F. Parrish, et al., 2003: Numerical aspects of the application of recursive filters to variational statistical analysis. Part I: Spatially homogeneous and isotropic Gaussian covariances. Mon. Wea. Rev., 131(8), 1524–1535.
Rappaport, E. N., J. L. Franklin, L. A. Avila, et al., 2009: Advances and challenges at the National Hurricane Center. Wea. Forecasting, 24(2), 395–419.
Rogers, R., S. Aberson, M. Black, et al., 2006: The intensity forecasting experiment: A NOAA multiyear field program for improving tropical cyclone intensity forecasts. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 87(11), 1523–1537.
Tong, M. J., and M. Xue, 2008: Simultaneous estimation of microphysical parameters and atmospheric state with simulated radar data and ensemble square root Kalman filter. Part I: Sensitivity analysis and parameter identifiability. Mon. Wea. Rev., 136(5), 1630–1648.
Torn, R. D., 2010: Performance of a mesoscale ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) during the NOAA High-Resolution Hurricane Test. Mon. Wea. Rev., 138(12), 4375–4392.
—, and G. J. Hakim, 2009: Ensemble data assimilation applied to RAINEX observations of Hurricane Katrina (2005). Mon. Wea. Rev., 137(9), 2817–2829.
Wang, Y. Q., 2002: Vortex rossby waves in a numerically simulated tropical cyclone. Part I: Overall structure, potential vorticity, and kinetic energy budgets. J. Atmos. Sci., 59(7), 1213–1238.
—, 2009: How do outer spiral rainbands affect tropical cyclone structure and intensity? J. Atmos. Sci., 66(5), 1250–1273.
Weng, Y. H., and F. Q. Zhang, 2012: Assimilating airborne Doppler radar observations with an ensemble Kalman filter for convection-permitting hurricane initialization and prediction: Katrina (2005). Mon. Wea. Rev., 140(3), 841–859.
Whitaker, J. S., and T. M. Hamill, 2002: Ensemble data assimilation without perturbed observations. Mon. Wea. Rev., 130(7), 1913–1924.
Wu, C.-C., G.-Y. Lien, J.-H. Chen, et al., 2010: Assimilation of tropical cyclone track and structure based on the ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF). J. Atmos. Sci., 67(12), 3806–3822.
Xue, M., K. K. Droegemeier, V. Wong, et al., 1995: ARPS Version 4.0 User’s Guide, 380 pp. Available at http://www.caps.ou.edu/ARPS.
1 —, —, and —, 2000: The Advanced Regional Prediction System (ARPS)-A multi-scale nonhydrostatic atmospheric simulation and prediction model. Part I: Model dynamics and verification. Meteor. Atmos. Physics, 75(3–4), 161–
2 —, —, —, et al., 2001: The Advanced Regional Prediction System (ARPS)-A multi-scale nonhydrostatic atmospheric simulation and prediction tool. Part II: Model physics and applications. Meteor. Atmos. Phys., 76(3–4), 143–
—, D.-H. Wang, J.-D. Gao, et al., 2003: The Advanced Regional Prediction System (ARPS), storm-scale numerical weather prediction and data assimilation. Meteor. Atmos. Phys., 82(1–4), 139–170.
—, M. J. Tong, and K. K. Droegemeier, 2006: An OSSE framework based on the ensemble square root Kalman filter for evaluating the impact of data from radar networks on thunderstorm analysis and forecasting. J. Atmos. Ocean Tech., 23(1), 46–66.
Zhang, F. Q., Y. H. Weng, J. A. Sippel, et al., 2009: Cloud-resolving hurricane initialization and prediction through assimilation of Doppler radar observations with an ensemble Kalman filter. Mon. Wea. Rev., 137(7), 2105–2125.
Zhao, K., and M. Xue, 2009: Assimilation of coastal Doppler radar data with the ARPS 3DVAR and cloud analysis for the prediction of Hurricane Ike (2008). Geophys. Res. Lett., 36(12), L12803.
—, X. F. Li, M. Xue, et al., 2012: Short-term forecasting through intermittent assimilation of data from Taiwan Region and Mainland China coastal radars for Typhoon Meranti (2010) at landfall. J. Geophy. Res., 117, D06108, doi: 10.1029/2011JD017109.
Zhao, Q. Y., and Y. Jin, 2008: High-resolution radar data assimilation for Hurricane Isabel (2003) at landfall. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 89(9), 1355–1372.
Zhu, T., and D.-L. Zhang, 2006: Numerical simulation of Hurricane Bonnie (1998). Part II: Sensitivity to varying cloud microphysical processes. J. Atmos. Sci., 63(1), 109–126.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Supported by the United States DOD ONR grants N00014-10-1-0133 and N00014-10-1-0775, NSF grants OCI-0905040 and AGS-0802888, and National Basic Research and Development (973) Program of China (2013CB430103).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Xue, M., Dong, J. Assimilating best track minimum sea level pressure data together with doppler radar data using an ensemble Kalman filter for Hurricane Ike (2008) at a cloud-resolving resolution. Acta Meteorol Sin 27, 379–399 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-013-0304-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-013-0304-7