Abstract
Human epithelial cadherin (E-cadherin), a member of transmembrane glycoprotein family, encoded by the E-cadherin gene, plays a key role in cell-cell adhesion, adherent junction in normal epithelial tissues, contributing to tissue differentiation and homeostasis. Although previous studies indicated that inactivation of the E-cadherin is mainly induced by hypermethylation of E-cadherin gene, evidence concerning E-cadherin hypermethylation in the carcinogenesis and development of non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) remains controversial. In this study, we conducted a meta-analysis to quantitatively evaluate the effects of E-cadherin hypermethylation on the incidence and clinicopathological characteristics of NSCLC. A comprehensive search of PubMed and Embase databases was performed up to October 2014. Analyses of pooled data were performed. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated and summarized. Our meta-analysis combining 18 published articles demonstrated that the hypermethylation frequencies in NSCLC were significantly higher than those in normal control tissues, OR = 3.55, 95 % confidence interval (CI) = 1.98–6.36, p < 0.0001. Further analysis showed that E-cadherin hypermethylation was not strongly associated with the sex or smoking status in NSCLC patients. In addition, E-cadherin hypermethylation was also not strongly associated with pathological types, differentiated status, clinical stages, or metastatic status in NSCLC patients. The results from the current study indicate that the hypermethylation frequency of E-cadherin in NSCLC is strongly associated with NSCLC incidence and it may be an early event in carcinogenesis of NSCLC. We also discussed the potential value of E-cadherin as a drug target that may bring new direction and hope for cancer treatment through gene-targeted therapy.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Background
Lung cancer has been the most frequently diagnosed cancer and leading cause of cancer mortality in the USA and other developed countries [1]. Non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) consists of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), adenocarcinoma (AC), large cell carcinoma, and others. NSCLC accounts for approximately 85 % of all lung cancers, and the prognosis remains poor [2]. Therefore, investigation on the mechanism of initiation and progression and identification of cancer risk marker are still needed for individualized treatment and better prognosis of NSCLC patients. Epigenetic regulation of tumor suppressor gene expression plays an important role in carcinogenesis. Aberrant methylation of tumor suppressor genes is a commonly observed epigenetic regulation in human tumors including NSCLC [3–5]. Patterns of DNA methylation can classify NSCLC into two phenotypically distinct subtypes of tumors and provide proof of principle that differences in DNA methylation can be used as a platform for predictive biomarker discovery and development [6]. Thus, measure of aberrant gene promoter methylation as a tool for diagnosis of tumors has been widely utilized for many different tumors including NSCLC [7].
Human epithelial cadherin (E-cadherin), a member of transmembrane glycoprotein family, also known as Cadherin-1 (CDH1), CAM 120/80, or uvomorulin, is encoded by the E-cadherin gene [8]. E-cadherin plays a key role in cell-cell adhesion, adherent junction in normal epithelial tissues, contributing to tissue differentiation and homeostasis [9, 10]. Reduced E-cadherin expression was often detected and associated with cancer invasion and metastasis in a variety of epithelial tumors [11–13]. E-cadherin methylation which is associated with the low and absent E-cadherin expression was detected in several kinds of carcinoma including breast cancer, gastric cancer, and NSCLC [14–16]. Although previous studies indicated that inactivation of the E-cadherin is mainly induced by hypermethylation of E-cadherin, the reported E-cadherin hypermethylation rates in NSCLC were remarkably diverse. Evidence concerning E-cadherin hypermethylation in the carcinogenesis and development of NSCLC remains controversial. Numerous studies published in this field examined a small number of patients. In addition, its roles in NSCLC and clinicopathological significance have not been thoroughly investigated. Hence, we conducted a meta-analysis to quantitatively evaluate the effects of E-cadherin hypermethylation on the incidence and clinicopathological characteristics of NSCLC.
Methods
Publication selection
A systematical literature searching was performed by PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science up to October 15, 2014. We used the following search terms: “lung” and “cancer or tumor or neoplasm or carcinoma,” “methylation,” and “E-cadherin or CDH1 or CAM 120/80.” We also searched manually for the reference lists of the retrieved articles and reviews for additional articles. After exclusion of non-relevant and/or redundant publications from different databases, the remaining papers were evaluated in the full-text version for inclusion and exclusion criteria and for relevant articles in the reference lists. All searched data were retrieved. Authors’ bibliographies and references of selected studies were also searched for other relevant studies. The most complete study was chosen to avoid duplication if same patient populations were reported in several publications.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Criteria that an eligible study has to meet were as follows: (1) E-cadherin hypermethylation evaluated in the primary NSCLC tissues, (2) researches revealed the relationship between E-cadherin hypermethylation and NSCLC clinicopathological parameters and prognosis, (3) E-cadherin hypermethylation examined by methylation-specific PCR (MSP) or quantitative MSP (QMSP), and (4) studies provided sufficient information to estimate hazard ratio (HR) about overall survival (OS) and 95 % confidence interval (CI). The exclusion criteria included the following: (1) letters, reviews, case reports, conference abstracts, editorials, and expert opinion and (2) all publications regarding in vitro/ex vivo studies, cell lines, and human xenografts were also excluded.
Data extraction and quality assessment
Two researchers (KZ and WC) independently collected the information and extracted the data regarding the authors, year, source of publication, inclusion criteria, E-cadherin methylation frequencies, sexual status, smoking history, pathological types, clinical staging, differentiation degree, lymph node metastasis, and prognostic conditions in patients and control groups. Any discrepancy was adjusted by discussion until they reach an agreement. Methodological evaluation was assessed by two independent researchers (NX and JZ) according to REMARK guidelines and ELCWP quality scale [17, 18].
Data analysis
Meta-analysis was performed by Reviewer Manager 5 (Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK). The pooled odds ratios (ORs) and confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to assess the correlation between E-cadherin methylation and NSCLC. Cochran’s Q test and I 2 were adopted to assess heterogeneity among studies [19]. If Q test showed a P < 0.05 or I 2 test was >50 %, it indicated significant heterogeneity and a fixed effects model was used to calculate the parameters. Otherwise, a random-effects model was used to pool data and attempt to identify potential sources of heterogeneity based on subgroup analyses [20, 21]. Publication bias was detected by Begge’s test and funnel plots [22]. The analysis of meta-regression and publication bias was performed by using STATA version 10.0.
Results
Identification of relevant studies
We identified 97 publications by the search method as described above. Seventy-nine of those were excluded due to non-original articles (review), laboratory studies, or studies irrelevant to the current analysis. Finally, there were 18 studies included in the meta-analysis as shown in Fig. 1.
Study characteristics
Eighteen studies published from 2001 to 2012 were eligible for meta-analysis. A total of 1467 NSCLC patients from China, Singapore, South Korea, Japan, France, Chile, and USA were enrolled. Their basic characteristics are summarized in Table 1.
The correlation of E-cadherin hypermethylation with clinicopathological features
The inactivation of E-cadherin through hypermethylation in NSCLC
We first determined that E-cadherin hypermethylation was significantly higher in NSCLC than in normal lung tissues. The pooled OR from 13 studies including 731 NSCLC and 613 normal lung tissues is shown in Fig. 2 (OR = 3.55, 95 % CI = 1.98–6.36, p < 0.0001), indicating that E-cadherin hypermethylation in NSCLC was significantly higher than that in normal lung tissues.
Relationship between the frequency of E-cadherin hypermethylation and sex status
Next, we determined whether or not E-cadherin hypermethylation rate was correlated with sex status. The pooled OR from eight studies included 723 males and 281 females with NSCLC, as shown in Fig. 3 (OR = 0.81, 95 % CI = 0.59–1.12, p = 0.21), which indicates that E-cadherin hypermethylation was not significantly correlated with sex status.
Relationship between the frequency of E-cadherin hypermethylation and smoking status
Then, we determined whether or not E-cadherin hypermethylation rate was correlated with smoking status. The pooled OR from eight studies including 657 and 225 NSCLCs with and without smoking history is shown in Fig. 4 (OR = 0.95, 95 % CI = 0.65–1.38, p = 0.79), which indicates that E-cadherin hypermethylation was not significantly correlated with smoking status in NSCLC patients.
Relationship between the frequency of E-cadherin hypermethylation and pathological types
We also determined whether or not E-cadherin hypermethylation was correlated with pathological types. The pooled OR from ten studies including 417 squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and 474 adenocarcinoma (AD) is shown in Fig. 5 (OR = 0.91, 95 % CI = 0.65–1.25, p = 0.55), which indicates that E-cadherin hypermethylation was not significantly correlated with pathological types.
The role of E-cadherin hypermethylation in NSCLC progression
We analyzed 437 NSCLC patients pooled from three studies to assess whether or not the aberrant E-cadherin hypermethylation in NSCLC was associated with the differentiated status. As shown in Fig. 6a, aberrant E-cadherin hypermethylation was not significantly higher in poorly differentiated NSCLC than that in moderately or highly differentiated NSCLC, OR = 0.4, 95 % CI = 0.13–1.28, p = 0.12. Aberrant E-cadherin hypermethylation was also not significantly higher in advanced NSCLC (III and IV) than that in early-stage NSCLC (I and II), OR = 0.89, 95 % CI = 0.63–1.26, p = 0.52 (Fig. 6b). These results suggest that E-cadherin hypermethylation may not play an important role in NSCLC progression and different stages. In addition, aberrant E-cadherin hypermethylation was also not significantly higher in metastatic NSCLC than that in non-metastatic NSCLC, OR = 1.10, 95 % CI = 0.72–1.67, p = 0.67 (Fig. 6c).
Sensitivity analyses and publication bias
A sensitivity analysis, in which one study was removed at a time, was conducted to assess the result stability. The pooled ORs were not significantly changed, indicating the stability of our analyses. The funnel plots were largely symmetric (Fig. 7a–g), suggesting that there were no publication biases in the meta-analysis of E-cadherin hypermethylation and clinicopathological features.
Discussion
The hypermethylation of tumor suppressor gene is an essential component of the molecular mechanism in the gene epigenomic regulation for cancer initiation and progression [41]. Inactivation of E-cadherin by promoter hypermethylation plays an important role in tumorigenesis in several types of tumors including NSCLC [14, 16, 42–44]. Although there have been some studies describing the methylation status of E-cadherin in NSCLC, the roles of inactivation of E-cadherin by hypermethylation in NSCLC and clinicopathological significance have not been thoroughly investigated. Our meta-analysis combining 18 published articles demonstrated that the hypermethylation frequencies in NSCLC were significantly higher than those in normal control tissues, OR = 3.55, 95 % CI = 1.98–6.36, p < 0.0001. Further analysis showed that E-cadherin hypermethylation was not strongly associated with the sex or smoking status in NSCLC patients. In addition, E-cadherin hypermethylation was also not strongly associated with pathological types, differentiated status, clinical stages, or metastatic status in NSCLC patients. The results from the current study indicate that the hypermethylation frequency of E-cadherin in NSCLC is strongly associated with NSCLC incidence; however, E-cadherin hypermethylation may be an early event in carcinogenesis of NSCLC. In support of this conclusion, Ceteci F et al. observed that postnatal inactivation of E-cadherin affected Clara cell differentiation and compromised airway regeneration under injury conditions, and the loss of E-cadherin function leads to tumor formation when additional mutations are sustained [45]. Their results indicate that E-cadherin plays a critical role in the regulation of proliferation and homeostasis of the epithelial cells lining the conducting airways.
Since changes in E-cadherin promoter hypermethylation are reversible, drug treatment through demethylation may be useful to delay carcinogenesis and progression. In fact, treatment of E-cadherin-negative tumor cells with the demethylating agent, 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine, induced re-expression of E-cadherin mRNA and/or protein in several types of tumor cells including colorectal cancer [46], esophageal cancer [47], prostate cancer [48], and NSCLC [49]. 1α,25(OH)(2)D(3) promoted differentiation of breast cancer MDA-MB-231 cells by inducing de novo E-cadherin expression, an effect that was time- and dose-dependent [50]. Transfection of E-cadherin cDNA into R-HepG2 cells, in which E-cadherin promoter was hypermethylated in drug resistance of a doxorubicin-induced multidrug-resistant hepatocellular carcinoma cell line, led to increased amount of doxorubicin uptake, decreased cell viability, decreased P-glycoprotein expression, and increased apoptotic population of cells exposed to doxorubicin [51]. Interestingly, a combination of histone deacetylase inhibitors and DNA methyltransferase inhibitors suppresses the growth of endometrial cancer, which is likely mediated by upregulation of E-cadherin and downregulation of Bcl-2 [52]. Therefore, the approaches targeting E-cadherin to reverse epigenetic silencing, reactivate gene expression, and, finally, induce a therapeutic effect such as differentiation, growth arrest, or apoptosis may bring new direction and hope for cancer treatment through gene-targeted therapy.
E-cadherin as a tumor suppressor gene functionally keeps cell-cell adhesion and controls epithelial cell arrangement in normal order and layer. A number of studies demonstrate that loss of the expression or function of E-cadherin can initiate the activation of several signaling pathways including the canonical Wnt and Rho family GTPase-mediated modulation of the actin cytoskeleton which are associated with epithelial-mesenchymal transition, finally leading to cancer cell metastasis [53, 54]. To better understand the correlation between E-cadherin methylation and NSCLC, comprehensive evaluation on the methylation markers in NSCLC should be further addressed. Although a large number of studies have demonstrated the potential relationship between E-cadherin methylation and NSCLC, a meta-analysis can summarize the studies and compare different subgroup characters.
A sensitivity analysis was used to assess the result stability, and the pooled ORs were not significantly changed, indicating the stability of our analyses. In addition, the funnel plots were largely symmetric, indicating that there were no publication biases in the meta-analysis of E-cadherin hypermethylation and clinicopathological features. However, there are several potential limitations in this meta-analysis. First, we only selected articles published in English; thus, other articles that were published in other languages were not selected, due to anticipated difficulties in obtaining accurate medical translation. Second, most selected articles are from Asia; hence, cautions should be taken when our findings are interpreted among the general populations. Third, DNA methylation is influenced by several clinicopathological parameters that are not taken into account in the study (i.e., age, ethnics, previous treatments, etc.).
In summary, this meta-analysis shows that E-cadherin hypermethylation is strongly associated with NSCLC incidence; however, E-cadherin hypermethylation is also not significantly associated with pathological types, differentiated status, clinical stages, or metastatic status in NSCLC patients. These results indicate that E-cadherin methylation might be an early biomarker of carcinogenesis of NSCLC, with potential value for predicting the diagnosis of NSCLC patients. In addition, the potential value of E-cadherin as a drug target may bring new direction and hope for cancer treatment through gene-targeted therapy.
References
Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, et al. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:69–90.
Ramalingam S, Belani C. Systemic chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: recent advances and future directions. Oncologist. 2008;13 Suppl 1:5–13.
Ghavifekr Fakhr M, Farshdousti Hagh M, Shanehbandi D, Baradaran B. DNA methylation pattern as important epigenetic criterion in cancer. Genet Res Int. 2013;2013:317569.
Delpu Y, Cordelier P, Cho WC, Torrisani J. DNA methylation and cancer diagnosis. Int J Mol Sci. 2013;14:15029–58.
Ma X, Wang YW, Zhang MQ, Gazdar AF. DNA methylation data analysis and its application to cancer research. Epigenomics. 2013;5:301–16.
Walter K, Holcomb T, Januario T, Du P, Evangelista M, et al. DNA methylation profiling defines clinically relevant biological subsets of non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18:2360–73.
Fleischhacker M, Dietrich D, Liebenberg V, Field JK, Schmidt B. The role of DNA methylation as biomarkers in the clinical management of lung cancer. Expert Rev Respir Med. 2013;7:363–83.
Bussemakers MJ, van Bokhoven A, Mees SG, Kemler R, Schalken JA. Molecular cloning and characterization of the human E-cadherin cDNA. Mol Biol Rep. 1993;17:123–8.
Rodriguez FJ, Lewis-Tuffin LJ, Anastasiadis PZ. E-cadherin’s dark side: possible role in tumor progression. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012;1826:23–31.
van RF. Beyond E-cadherin: roles of other cadherin superfamily members in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2014;14:121–34.
Karayiannakis AJ, Syrigos KN, Chatzigianni E, Papanikolaou S, Alexiou D, et al. Aberrant E-cadherin expression associated with loss of differentiation and advanced stage in human pancreatic cancer. Anticancer Res. 1998;18:4177–80.
Zheng Z, Pan J, Chu B, Wong YC, Cheung AL, et al. Downregulation and abnormal expression of E-cadherin and beta-catenin in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: close association with advanced disease stage and lymph node metastasis. Hum Pathol. 1999;30:458–66.
Oka H, Shiozaki H, Kobayashi K, Inoue M, Tahara H, et al. Expression of E-cadherin cell adhesion molecules in human breast cancer tissues and its relationship to metastasis. Cancer Res. 1993;53:1696–701.
Su CY, Li YS, Han Y, Zhou SJ, Liu ZD. Correlation between expression of cell adhesion molecules CD44 v6 and E-cadherin and lymphatic metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15:2221–4.
Ponce E, Louie MC, Sevigny MB. Acute and chronic cadmium exposure promotes E-cadherin degradation in MCF7 breast cancer cells. Mol Carcinog. 2014.
Schildberg CW, Abba M, Merkel S, Agaimy A, Dimmler A, et al. Gastric cancer patients less than 50 years of age exhibit significant downregulation of E-cadherin and CDX2 compared to older reference populations. Adv Med Sci. 2014;59:142–6.
Altman DG, McShane LM, Sauerbrei W, Taube SE. Reporting recommendations for tumor marker prognostic studies (REMARK): explanation and elaboration. BMC Med. 2012;10:51.
Sculier JP, Ghisdal L, Berghmans T, Branle F, Lafitte JJ, et al. The role of mitomycin in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis of the literature. Br J Cancer. 2001;84:1150–5.
Huedo-Medina TB, Sanchez-Meca J, Marin-Martinez F, Botella J. Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I2 index? Psychol Methods. 2006;11:193–206.
Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327:557–60.
DerSimonian R. Meta-analysis in the design and monitoring of clinical trials. Stat Med. 1996;15:1237–48. discussion 1249–1252.
Begg CB, Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics. 1994;50:1088–101.
Zheng SY, Hou JY, Zhao J, Jiang D, Ge JF, et al. Clinical outcomes of downregulation of E-cadherin gene expression in non-small cell lung cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13:1557–61.
Guzman L, Depix MS, Salinas AM, Roldan R, Aguayo F, et al. Analysis of aberrant methylation on promoter sequences of tumor suppressor genes and total DNA in sputum samples: a promising tool for early detection of COPD and lung cancer in smokers. Diagn Pathol. 2012;7:87.
Begum S, Brait M, Dasgupta S, Ostrow KL, Zahurak M, et al. An epigenetic marker panel for detection of lung cancer using cell-free serum DNA. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17:4494–503.
Sasaki H, Hikosaka Y, Kawano O, Moriyama S, Yano M, et al. Methylation of the DLEC1 gene correlates with poor prognosis in Japanese lung cancer patients. Oncol Lett. 2010;1:283–7.
Vaissiere T, Hung RJ, Zaridze D, Moukeria A, Cuenin C, et al. Quantitative analysis of DNA methylation profiles in lung cancer identifies aberrant DNA methylation of specific genes and its association with gender and cancer risk factors. Cancer Res. 2009;69:243–52.
Buckingham L, Penfield FL, Kim A, Liptay M, Barger C, et al. PTEN, RASSF1 and DAPK site-specific hypermethylation and outcome in surgically treated stage I and II nonsmall cell lung cancer patients. Int J Cancer. 2010;126:1630–9.
Wang G, Hu X, Lu C, Su C, Luo S, et al. Promoter-hypermethylation associated defective expression of E-cadherin in primary non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2008;62:162–72.
Feng Q, Hawes SE, Stern JE, Wiens L, Lu H, et al. DNA methylation in tumor and matched normal tissues from non-small cell lung cancer patients. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008;17:645–54.
Wang Y, Zhang D, Zheng W, Luo J, Bai Y, et al. Multiple gene methylation of nonsmall cell lung cancers evaluated with 3-dimensional microarray. Cancer. 2008;112:1325–36.
Tan SH, Ida H, Lau QC, Goh BC, Chieng WS, et al. Detection of promoter hypermethylation in serum samples of cancer patients by methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction for tumour suppressor genes including RUNX3. Oncol Rep. 2007;18:1225–30.
Kim DS, Kim MJ, Lee JY, Kim YZ, Kim EJ, et al. Aberrant methylation of E-cadherin and H-cadherin genes in nonsmall cell lung cancer and its relation to clinicopathologic features. Cancer. 2007;110:2785–92.
Gu J, Berman D, Lu C, Wistuba II, Roth JA, et al. Aberrant promoter methylation profile and association with survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:7329–38.
Nakata S, Sugio K, Uramoto H, Oyama T, Hanagiri T, et al. The methylation status and protein expression of CDH1, p16(INK4A), and fragile histidine triad in nonsmall cell lung carcinoma: epigenetic silencing, clinical features, and prognostic significance. Cancer. 2006;106:2190–9.
Tsou JA, Shen LY, Siegmund KD, Long TI, Laird PW, et al. Distinct DNA methylation profiles in malignant mesothelioma, lung adenocarcinoma, and non-tumor lung. Lung Cancer. 2005;47:193–204.
Russo AL, Thiagalingam A, Pan H, Califano J, Cheng KH, et al. Differential DNA hypermethylation of critical genes mediates the stage-specific tobacco smoke-induced neoplastic progression of lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11:2466–70.
Topaloglu O, Hoque MO, Tokumaru Y, Lee J, Ratovitski E, et al. Detection of promoter hypermethylation of multiple genes in the tumor and bronchoalveolar lavage of patients with lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:2284–8.
Yanagawa N, Tamura G, Oizumi H, Takahashi N, Shimazaki Y, et al. Promoter hypermethylation of tumor suppressor and tumor-related genes in non-small cell lung cancers. Cancer Sci. 2003;94:589–92.
Zochbauer-Muller S, Fong KM, Virmani AK, Geradts J, Gazdar AF, et al. Aberrant promoter methylation of multiple genes in non-small cell lung cancers. Cancer Res. 2001;61:249–55.
Akhavan-Niaki H, Samadani AA. DNA methylation and cancer development: molecular mechanism. Cell Biochem Biophys. 2013;67:501–13.
Ponce E, Louie MC, Sevigny MB. Acute and chronic cadmium exposure promotes E-cadherin degradation in MCF7 breast cancer cells. Mol Carcinog. 2014;5:22170.
Chang Z, Zhou H, Liu Y. Promoter methylation and polymorphism of E-cadherin gene may confer a risk to prostate cancer: a meta-analysis based on 22 studies. Tumour Biol. 2014;24:24.
Wu X, Zhuang YX, Hong CQ, Chen JY, You YJ, et al. Clinical importance and therapeutic implication of E-cadherin gene methylation in human ovarian cancer. Med Oncol. 2014;31:100.
Ceteci F, Ceteci S, Zanucco E, Thakur C, Becker M, et al. E-cadherin controls bronchiolar progenitor cells and onset of preneoplastic lesions in mice. Neoplasia. 2012;14:1164–77.
Liu Y, Hong Y, Zhao Y, Ismail TM, Wong Y, et al. Histone H3 (lys-9) deacetylation is associated with transcriptional silencing of E-cadherin in colorectal cancer cell lines. Cancer Investig. 2008;26:575–82.
Ling ZQ, Li P, Ge MH, Zhao X, Hu FJ, et al. Hypermethylation-modulated down-regulation of CDH1 expression contributes to the progression of esophageal cancer. Int J Mol Med. 2011;27:625–35.
Patra A, Deb M, Dahiya R, Patra SK. 5-Aza-2'-deoxycytidine stress response and apoptosis in prostate cancer. Clin Epigenetics. 2011;2:339–48.
Liu YY, Han JY, Lin SC, Liu ZY, Jiang WT. Effect of CDH1 gene methylation on transforming growth factor (TGF-beta)-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition in alveolar epithelial cell line A549. Genet Mol Res. 2014;13.
Lopes N, Carvalho J, Duraes C, Sousa B, Gomes M, et al. 1Alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 induces de novo E-cadherin expression in triple-negative breast cancer cells by CDH1-promoter demethylation. Anticancer Res. 2012;32:249–57.
Jiang L, Chan JY, Fung KP. Epigenetic loss of CDH1 correlates with multidrug resistance in human hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2012;422:739–44.
Yi TZ, Li J, Han X, Guo J, Qu Q, et al. DNMT inhibitors and HDAC inhibitors regulate E-cadherin and Bcl-2 expression in endometrial carcinoma in vitro and in vivo. Chemotherapy. 2012;58:19–29.
Sahai E, Marshall CJ. RHO-GTPases and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002;2:133–42.
Vincan E, Barker N. The upstream components of the Wnt signalling pathway in the dynamic EMT and MET associated with colorectal cancer progression. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2008;25:657–63.
Conflicts of interest
None
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhong, K., Chen, W., Xiao, N. et al. The clinicopathological significance and potential drug target of E-cadherin in NSCLC. Tumor Biol. 36, 6139–6148 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-015-3298-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-015-3298-1