Abstract
In this study, water quality index (WQI) was applied at one of the most crowded Nile reaches surroundings in Egypt to investigate its impacts on different water uses. Twelve sites are selected for monitoring (S1–S12) within the irrigation system network of the Qalyubia Governorate, and water samples from these locations in 2021 were collected, analyzed, assessed, and compared to analyze water quality data collected in 2014 in light of the Egyptian permissible water quality limits regarding the drinking and irrigation uses. These two main sets of data were chosen to emphasize the change in WQI within this period, denoting the time before the epidemic COVID19 and after the lockdown of the epidemic in 2021 in the study area. Fifteen physicochemical water parameters were measured. The results show that the WQI for the surface water monitoring sites is classified as good quality except for S8, which showed a poor water quality type. In addition, S2 has recorded a BOD concentration of 6.4 mg/L, which is slightly above the Egyptian limit (6 mg/L). Also, S8 recorded a slight increase in Fe, Mn, and F compared to permissible concentrations. TDS varies between 258.08, 318, and (249 ± 18.2) mg/L for minimum, maximum, and average ± standard deviation, respectively, indicating suitable irrigation water. The study suggests that surface water can be used to irrigate crops, but it should be purified before being used for drinking purposes. A comparison of the water quality parameters for the years 2014 and 2021 for the sites S1, S4, S5, S7, S9, and S10 reveals an increase in water quality from poor (2014) to good (2021). Therefore, the poor water quality in 2014 can be referred the effect of inadequate sewage treatment, industrial wastewater flows, and urban runoff discharge, which had been decreased with the decrease in different activities during the epidemic period and lockdown.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are endangered due to the increasing scarcity in water and its impacts on food production (SDGs 2014). In particular, the SDGs related to hunger, poverty, and environmental sustainability are threatened by population increase, urban sprawl, climate change, in addition to a series of connected and cascading international crises and wars, as the aggravating COVID-19 epidemic and the food, energy, humanitarian, and refugee crises. The wars in Ukraine and recently in Sudan are also fueling recognized emergency situations. The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2022 presents evidence of the negative effects of those crises in achieving the SDGs 2022. As a consequence, the management of water resources has become an increasingly challenging job from a technological, economic, social, and political perspective. Monitoring water quality is an important tool for long-term assessment that provides valuable information for water stakeholders. Many countries with arid or semiarid climates that are sensitive to climate change (Mohammed et al. 2022; Abdel-Fatteh et al. 2020) face a delicate and crucial issue with surface water quality. Public awareness is needed to ensure water quality preservation. Surface and groundwater pollution has a direct effect on the human health, economy, and water resources availability (Brkic et al. 2019). About 80% of infections in low-income and developing countries are directly linked to contaminated drinking water and unhygienic settings (Das and Nag 2015). The quantity and kind of anthropogenic activity in an area's basins, including agricultural, industrial, and other activities, greatly influences the quality of that area's surface water (Atta et al. 2022). In Egypt, the limited water supply must balance a range of expanding needs. The complex and unpredictably interwoven components of the Egyptian water resources system interact with other complex and unrelated systems, such as the economic, social, and environmental systems. The Nile River, rainfall-runoff, and groundwater for both renewable and non-renewable aquifers are all examples of freshwater resources in Egypt (Gabr 2020). Point and non-point sources of pollution such as untreated wastewater, nutrients coming from agricultural runoff, and industrial wastewater are degraded surfaces and groundwater sources (Nouhaila et al. 2022; Gabr 2022). In order to decrease pollution and enhance water quality, researchers must examine and control the fluctuations in the amounts of heavy metals and other substances in both surface and groundwater. In contrary to organic pollutants, heavy metals tend to accumulate in living organs and are not biodegradable. Additionally recognized to be harmful or carcinogenic are certain heavy metal ions (El-Amier et al. 2021). Heavy metal separation and purification have come under a lot of strain due to their bioaccumulation in food chains and toxicity to biological systems as concentrations increase over time. Heavy metals are changing into one of the most significant environmental problems due to their negative impacts on ecosystem. For irrigation waters, salinity, sodicity, and ion toxicity are the most significant quality problems. Continuous soil and water river monitoring is necessary to detect any changes in salt concentration (Gabr 2018). The threshold concentration at which certain salts, such as HCO3−1, CO32+, Na+, Cl−, Mg2+, and other trace elements, have a detrimental effect on plant growth (Zaman et al. 2018). In order to evaluate the water quality status of irrigation water, water quality index (WQI) is used. WQI is a single unitless value deduced through mathematical method based on various hydro-chemical properties (El-Amier et al. 2021). Many WQI exist like Kelley index (KI), permeability index (PI), potential salinity (PS), etc. (Shil et al. 2019) based on used parameters group. In general, water quality indices are categorized into four main groups: (1) public indices used for general water quality (e.g., NSFWQI), (2) specific consumption indices based on the kind of consumption and application, whether it is drinking, industrial, ecosystem preservation, etc. (e.g., BCWQI), (3) designing or planning indices aiding decision-making and planning in water quality management projects (Agriculture, desalination, and remediation projects), and (4) statistical indices used based on personal opinions considerations. On reclaimed land, an understanding of water quality is taken into consideration while planning and managing the water supply and irrigation system. In order to gain a comprehensive understanding of surface water appropriateness for drinking and irrigation applications in Egypt's Qalyubia governorate, this research work uses hydro-chemical WQI technique. To achieve this objective, twelve monitoring sites (S1 through S12) were selected for water sampling. In 2021, water samples from these sites were taken, examined, evaluated, and compared to examine water quality data from 2014. These two major sets of data were chosen to reflect the WQI changes before and after the COVID-19 pandemic, and the impacts of the lockdown on the WQI in the same investigated regions. Fifteen water quality parameters were analyzed for each sample (i.e., total dissolved solids (TDS), pH, dissolved oxygen (DO), chemical oxygen demand (COD), biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorous (TP), organic nitrogen (ON), ammonia (NH3), sulfates (SO4), nitrate (NO3), iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), fluoride (F), and oil and greases (O&G). Water quality index was deduced and compared to the Egyptian water quality criteria and the World Health Organization (WHO) for the years 2014 and 2022, to determine the water quality suitability for different water uses.
Materials and methods
Study area
The research area is located in the Egyptian delta province of Qalyubia governorate. Banha City is the capital, as shown in Fig. 1. Population, urban sprawl, and rising industrial activity are fast growing in Qalyubia. According to demographic estimations, the governorate's population was predominantly concentrated in rural areas with only 44.7% of its residents residing in urban areas. 2,825,045 of the governorate's projected 5,105,972 residents lived in rural areas, while only 2,280,927 are found in urban areas (CAPMAS 2015).
Sample collection and preparation
We selected twelve locations along the Rayah EL-Tawfiki (one of the main Nile river branches), Qalyubia, Egypt, for the collection of water samples using GPS device (eTrex series, Garmin, Romsey, UK). The proximity of drinking water purification facilities and the locations of potential pollution sources were taken into consideration while choosing these water quality monitoring sites. Table 1 summarizes the monitoring site coordinates on the irrigation network. Three surface water samples were gathered in December 2021 (winter season), at a depth of 15–30 cm at each site, and stored in acid-washed polyethylene bottles for examination. The samples were then filtered using 0.45-m membrane filters. All necessary measures were performed to prevent sample contamination during sample collection and processing (total samples: 12 sites × 3 samples with total of 36 samples). In this study, we analyze for each sample fifteen water parameter pH, TDS, DO, BOD, COD, TN, TP, NH3, SO4, ON, NO3, Fe, Mn, F, and O&G. The principal ions and trace elements were investigated by the water quality laboratory of the Faculty of Engineering at Ain Shams University, Egypt. Using the Hydrolab model Multi Set 430i WTW, pH was measured in situ. The biological oxygen demand (BOD) was calculated using a 5-day incubation procedure. The potassium permanganate method was used to conduct the chemical oxygen demand (COD) test. As soon as the water samples were taken, the alkalinity of the water was assessed using the markers methyl orange and phenolphthalein. The amounts of chlorinity and sulfate were determined using the Mohr's and turbidimetric procedures, respectively. Ion chromatography equipment (Dionex, ICS-1100, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) was used to measure SO42−. The electrical balance (EB%) between the cations and anions was used to evaluate the precision and dependability of the chemical analysis (Appelo and Postma 2005). Using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP, POEMSIII, Thermo Jarrell elemental company, Waltham, MA, USA) and standard solutions containing 1000 mg/L (Merck), trace elements (Fe, Mn, and F) were detected. A glass fiber filter (GF/C) was used to filter a volume of sample, and a known weight of the filtrate was evaporated at 105 °C to determine the total dissolved solids (TDS). TSS, or total suspended solids, is the distinction between TS and TDS. A modified Winkler technique was used to calculate the amount of dissolved oxygen (DO, mg/L). The phenate technique was used to measure ammonia. Using a colorimetric method, nitrite was found via the production of a reddish-purple azo-dye. After cadmium reduction, nitrate was found to be nitrite. The ascorbic acid-molybdate method was used to measure orthophosphate and total phosphorus (TP).
In addition, fifteen water quality parameters pH, TDS, DO, BOD, COD, TN, TP, NH3, SO4, ON, NO3, Fe, Mn, F, and O&G for the sites 1, 4, 5, 7, 9, and 10 were gathered from the Egyptian Ministry of Water Resources and Irrigation during December 2014. The analyzed water quality metrics were statistically broken down using the Excel tool, and a correlation matrix between the WQI and its properties was created. The mapping of the concentration of the water quality metrics also made use of the Surfer 16 program.
Water quality index (WQI)
The presence of undesired dissolved salts or components is the primary factor used to determine water suitability for various uses (Sener et al. 2017; Megahed et al. 2022; Kamboj and Kamboj 2019). There are many methods utilized to evaluate the water quality for use in irrigation and for drinking such as the water quality index (WQI) (Oregon 2001; CCME1999) and the irrigation water quality index (IWQI) (Yıldız and Karakuş 2020; Soumaia et al. 2022).
Weighted arithmetic water quality index method
The weighted arithmetic approach, for the index of water quality, is widely used to evaluate water quality as follows:
(i) Determine the value of the constant K using the formula
where \({s}_{i}\) is the standard allowable for ith water parameter.
(ii) For each water parameter, the quality rating scale (\({Q}_{i}\)) is calculated by substituting in the following equation:
where \({V}_{i}\) is computed level of ith parameter in the analyzed water, \({V}_{0}\) is ideal value of this parameter's in pure water. Therefore, for disolved oxygen \({V}_{0}\) = 14.6 mg/L; for pH, \({V}_{0}\) = 7; otherwise, \({V}_{0}\) is equal to zero for any water parameter.
(iii) For each individual water quality parameter, the unit weight (\({W}_{i}\)) is calculated as follows:
(iv) then the water quality index was calculated using the equation below:
In this method, the allocation of Wi is a very important issue as weights generally refer to the relative importance of each water parameter with respect to the other parameters (Megahed et al. 2022 and Kamboj and Kamboj 2019). There are five WQI classifications ranging the value of WQI from zero (excellent water quality) to more than 100% (unsuitable for drinking and irrigation purposes). Oregon 2001 classified the WQI into five categories as shown in Table 2.
Assessment of studied water quality parameters using WQI
Based on how much the surface water is suitable for human consumption, the weighted arithmetic water quality index (WQI) is calculated in this study. The WHO 2011, drinking water standards, and Egypt's drinking water standards (Egypt Decree 458/2007) have both been considered for calculating WQI. Each of the 15 water parameters DO, pH, BOD, TDS, COD, TN, TP, ON, NH3, SO4, NO3, Fe, Mn, F, and O&G has been given a weight (\({W}_{i}\)) based on how it is thought to affect primary health and how that affects the overall quality of water that may be used for drinking. The parameters with the greatest impact on water quality (TN, TP, ON, NH3, Mn, and Fe) are given a weight of 4, while the parameters with the less effects are given a weight of 2 (pH and O and G). Other variables like TDS, DO, BOD, COD, SO4, NO3, and NH3 are given a weight of 3 based on how important they are to the overall quality of the water. Table 3 summarizes the allocated weight, Egypt Decree 458/2007 and WHO 2008 water standards values, and the estimated relative weight. After calculating the WQI values, the water quality is rated and categorized according to Table 1. Figure 2 shows the WQI computation methodology based on spread Excel sheet.
Results
Using the excel spreadsheets software, the statistical breakdown of the 15 water quality parameters was calculated. As indicated in Table 4, the Qalyubia irrigation network's 12 monitoring sites' pH, TDS, DO, BOD, COD, TN, TP, ON, NH3, SO4, NO3, Fe, Mn, F, and O&G, as well as the WQI deduced from the selected equation. Then the Surfer 16 software was used to display the results in a graphical way. Figure 3 shows the map of the 15 water quality parameters that were examined and their concentrations for the Qalyubia irrigation network in 2021.
Physicochemical and biochemical water parameters
The measured pH values maximum, minimum, and (average ± standard deviation) were 8.12 (S7), 8.02 (S4), and (8.07 ± 0.04), respectively. All the measured pH values were confined between 6.5 and 8.5 according to permissible limits (Egypt's Law No. 458 of 2007 and Law No. 48 1998). TDS indicates excellent concentration as the TDS values maximum, minimum, and (average ± standard deviation) were 318 (S8), 249 (S10), and (258.1 ± 18.18), respectively. All the TDS values were below the allowable TDS (1000 mg/L). One of the primary and significant drinking water factors is TDS. Water's taste is significantly influenced by the overall amount of solids present. The research area's water samples are classified as having fresh water types based on the TDS classifications provided by (Batabyal et al. 2015; Brindha et al. 2015; Brown et al. 1970). For all stations, DO above 6 mg/L, a maximum of 8.2 mg/L was recorded in site 10, while the minimum was 7.1 mg/L recorded in site 1, and an average of (7.725 ± 0.327). The amount of pollution caused by organic materials is measured by the DO (Bora and Goswami 2017). Therefore, a decline in DO indicates that the surface water is contaminated with organic matter. Measured BOD and COD indicate maximum values of 6.4 and 11.6 mg/L, respectively, in S2 above the allowed Egyptian values of 6 and 10 mg/L, respectively, while the minimum BOD and COD were measured at sites 12 and 11, respectively, at 4.6 mg/L and 7.4 mg/L. The average BOD and COD were (5.5 ± 0.64) mg/L and (9.33 ± 1.53) mg/L, respectively. Except for sites 1, 2, 6, and 7, all of the sites show lower BOD and COD concentrations than the Egyptian regulation standards (Table 4 and Fig. 3). The largest source of BOD is probably domestic sewage, and it increases in the direction of the downstream contaminated canals (Chandra et al. 2017). The measured SO4 values maximum, minimum, and (average ± standard deviation) were 68.6 (S8), 34.1 (S7), and (41.6 ± 8.66) mg/L. All the measured SO4 values were below 250 mg/L according to Egyptian regulations.
Organic matter (TN, TP, ON, NH3, NO3, and O&G)
The maximum values of measured TN and TP are 0.14 (S3) and 0.021 (S2) mg/L, respectively, which are lower than the permitted Egyptian levels of 3.5 and 2 mg/L, respectively. While the minimal TN and TP were measured at sites 11 and 8, respectively, at 0.003 mg/L and 0.0003 mg/L. The typical values for the two parameters were (0.08 ± 4 0.05) mg/L and (0.011 ± 0.007) mg/L, respectively. In comparison with Egyptian regulations, all sites show lower TN and TP concentrations (Table 4 and Fig. 3). The measured organic nitrogen (ON) values maximum, minimum, and (average ± standard deviation) were 0.0096 (S8), 0.0024 (S2), and (0.006 ± 0.002) mg/L. Measured NH3 and NO3 indicate maximum values of 0.09 (sites 2, 3, 5, and 7) and 1.13 (S1) mg/L, respectively, and all sites were below the allowed Egyptian values of 0.5 and 2 mg/L, respectively, which confirm high water quality (Table 4 and Fig. 3), whereas the minimum NH3 and NO3 were recorded at 0.01 mg/L (sites 10, 11, and 12) and 0.71 (S12) mg/L, respectively. All the sites indicate lower NH3 and NO3 concentrations compared to the Egyptian regulation values. In contrast to nitrite and nitrate, which can be harmful to human health, ammonium in drinking water is not directly related to human health (Nihalani and Meeruty 2021; WHO 2011). Ammonium values up to 0.5 mg/L are allowed if the waterworks do not include a filtration step and the distribution system does not change ammonium to nitrite. Nitrate levels in drinking water must not exceed 50 mg/L at consumer faucets, private property entrances, and waterworks exits. Drinking water standards for nitrite are 0.01 mg/L at waterworks exits, 0.1 mg/L at private property entrances, and 0.1 mg/L at consumer taps (WHO 2011; MEFD 2017; Schullehner et al. 2017). The most significant and prevalent alkaline component in the atmosphere, ammonia (NH3), is responsible for the aerosolization of sulfate and nitrate (Zhou et al. 2016; Fu et al. 2015). Additionally, it develops into a second source of NO and N2O (Fernández et al. 2015). A loss in biodiversity, eutrophication of water bodies, and soil acidification are further effects of NH3 sinking into terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. Measured O&G values maximum, minimum, and (average ± standard deviation) were 0.36 (S12), 0.1 (S1), and (0.22 ± 0.08) mg/L. Except for S1, all of the measured O&G values exceeded the permitted limits (0.1 mg/L) as per Egyptian rules.
Heavy metals (Fe, Mn, and F)
The average Fe and Mn were (0.052 ± 0.13) mg/L and (0.052 ± 0.14) mg/L. According to Egyptian regulations, all the measured F values were within allowable concentrations except for S8. Measured Fe and Mn values maximum and minimum were 0.48 mg/L (all sites except for S8) and 51 mg/L (all sites except for S8), respectively. Measured F values maximum, minimum, and (average ± standard deviation) were 0.63 (S8), 0.1 (S2), and (0.16 ± 0.14) mg/L. According to Egyptian regulations, all the measured F values were within allowable concentrations (0.1 mg/L) except for S8. Water contamination from sewage irrigation is confirmed by high Mn levels (Abuzaid et al. 2022). According to the local geology and other chemical elements of the river, iron, the fourth most prevalent element in the Earth's crust, may be present in natural waters in varied concentrations (ANZECC 2000). Iron is often found in its ferric condition in surface waters, while it can occasionally be found in its ferrous form in reducing waters. In fresh water, the current analytical practical quantitation limit (PQL) for iron is 1 g/L, whereas, in marine water, it is 2 g/L (Wang et al. 2020). Although additional forms of iron may be present in organic and inorganic wastewater streams, ferrous (Fe2+) and ferric (Fe3+) states are the most frequent oxidization states of iron in the water.
Assessment of the water quality using the WQI method
Evaluations of water quality avoid complex data intervals since the quality of irrigation water is defined as a single number. The notion behind comparing water quality measures to predetermined standards forms the basis of WQI evaluation. The irrigation water quality index is computed using the suggested water consumption limits for all soil types. The grading of water quality based on WQI values is displayed in Table 5. The WQI variation for the surface water in the Qalyubia irrigation network is also shown in Fig. 4. The WQI score in the study ranged from 35 (good) to 62 (poor), with a mean score of (41 ± 7.5) (good). The samples from sites 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, and 12 all indicated good water quality, while samples from S8 showed poor water quality.
Discussion
Analysis of the measured water quality sites between the years 2014 and 2022
The water quality parameters for sites 1, 4, 5, 7, 9, and 10 were gathered as shown in Table 6. The values of pH, TDS, DO, TN, TP, NH3, SO4, NO3, Fe, Mn, F, and O&G are within permissible limits (Egypt's Law No. 458 of 2007 and Law No. 48 1998) for all sites. On the other hand, the BOD, COD, and NO3 show values greater than the permissible limits. In addition, the computed WQI for all sites shows a poor water quality category (C) as shown in Table 7. In addition, Fig. 5 shows a comparison between the surface WQI for the Qalyubia irrigation network for the years 2014 and 2022. The results show improvement in the water quality for sites 1, 4, 5, and 7 (good water quality). On the other hand, sites 9 and 10 indicate poor water categories for the years 2014 and 2022. The study area's water quality was improved in 2014 by the ministry of water resources and irrigation by halting point and non-point sources of pollution and by building new wastewater treatment plants. Additionally in 2020, the government put in place a variety of restrictions to hinder the COVID-19 virus from spreading within Egypt's borders. These restrictions include quarantines, partial lockdowns, movement restrictions, social isolation, and personnel layoffs that are not absolutely necessary (Tarek and Mohamed 2022). The flow of agro-food products to customers and markets may have been impeded by these restrictions, but the food supply has remained stable thus far. These precautions contributed to improving water quality. Numerous reports have shown the impact COVID-19 has had on the world's food and agriculture businesses [e.g., WAGENINGEN University and Research (https://www.wur.nl/en/Research-Results/Research-Institutes/Economic-Research/show-wecr/Research-into-the-impacts-of-COVID-19-onthe-agriculture-sector.htm), and UNESCO–IHE, Delft (https://www.oecd.org/coronavirus/policy-responses/covid-19-andthe-food-and-agriculture-sector-issues-and-policy-responses-a23f764b/)]. Additionally, non-governmental remedies were offered and certain governmental activities for COVID-19 socio-economic duties, recovery plans, and mitigation scenarios were stressed [e.g., United Nations, Egypt (https://unsdg.un.org/sites/default/files/2020-08/EGY_Socioeconomic-Response-Plan_2020.pdf)].
Correlation matrix (CM) for studied water quality parameters.
A correlation matrix (CM) was built to identify the relationship between the various water quality parameters of samples of the surface water concentration, such as BOD, Fe, Mn, and F, and the water quality index (WQI). For the 12 sites under study, this matrix was created for various parameters including pH, TDS, DO, BOD, COD, TN, TP, ON, NH3, SO4, NO3, Fe, Mn, F, and O&G as well as the WQI. Spreadsheet Excel was used to execute CM (Table 8). The generated correlation matrix shows a substantial positive link between the higher values of WQI and TDS, SO4, Fe, Mn, and F, whereas NH3, ON, COD, and BOD also have a moderate negative relationship with the water quality index (WQI), which means that low WQI (high water quality) is associated with moderate surface water quality parameters concentrations for NH3, ON, COD, and BOD. The correlations between pH, DO, NO3, TP, TN, O&G, and WQI are weak. Analyzing the quality of the water can help with contamination prevention and resource exploitation (Abdel-Fatteh et al. 2020). In this work, we assessed water quality and primarily used the measured data to reveal the water quality state. The WQI performance, however, could be directly impacted by human activities such as anthropogenic interference, industrial and home sewage outflow, and agricultural non-point source discharge. This phenomenon has been discovered and documented in some earlier investigations (Gad et al. 2022; Abdo et al. 2022). The overall assessment showed that the majority of the time, the water quality could be classified as "good" or "bad" and that upstream stations generally had better water quality than downstream ones. However, some parameters, such as BOD, COD, and NH3-N, were found to be above threshold levels, indicating that additional efforts should be made to protect downstream water quality and that critical water parameters need to be limited in these years. Because each parameter's impact on the water status varies in some WQI aggregations, it is impossible to apply a unit weight for each one.
A low WQI rating due to a high concentration of a parameter with a high weight could lead to an incorrect perception of the water quality situation. A correct method of assigning the weights is therefore crucial. The weights utilized in this investigation were adapted from Pesce and Wunderlin, (2000) and Sun et al. (2016) and revised from those sources, which has also been supported by other studies. However, because it is outside the main focus of the study, the study did not look at the WQI weights' level of uncertainty. Therefore, more consideration must be given to the overall level of uncertainty in WQI evaluation since it is rarely investigated and analyzed. Varied protection aims and districts have different classification standards, which introduces some uncertainty in the evaluation. The WQI evaluation findings could vary if the standards are changed. The weights that different water quality parameters are given are another source of ambiguity. The weight assigned to each measure varied significantly in earlier studies on the evaluation of water quality (Ewaid et al. 2018; Seifi et al. 2020).
The Nile River in the Egypt Delta has seen new issues recently, and further investigation is still required to ascertain the precise reason for the change in water quality, which may vary with time and geography. For instance, difficulties include the growing population, urbanization, industrial effluent, agricultural fertilizers, untreated wastewater, and associated point and non-point sources of pollution (Abdel-Fatteh et al. 2020). The development of a linked hydrodynamic and water quality simulation model may help reveal the spatiotemporal variation and aid in the prediction of contamination concentration. Additionally, the WQI model built in this work can be linked with the simulation results that give data sources under various hydrological or hydrodynamic conditions to achieve comprehensive water quality evaluation. The model, which combined the physics-based hydrodynamic-water quality model and the statistical WQI model, was able to identify the source of pollution and offer exact preventative and control strategies for environments that were changing.
Conclusions
The Qalyubia Governorate in Egypt was selected to represent one of the highest population activities in the Delta. The water quality index (WQI) was used to test the overall water quality of the main water streams in the study area to determine its suitability for different uses, i.e., drinking, industrial, and irrigation. Water samples from different twelve monitoring stations (Sites S1 through S12) distributed within the Qalyubia Governorate's irrigation system were collected, analyzed, and evaluated, in 2021 and compared to water quality data from 2014 in the light of the Egyptian water quality standards for drinking and irrigation uses. These two main sets of data were chosen to reflect the WQI before and after the lockdown and halt of many human activities within the epidemic of COVID-19. A total of fifteen water quality indicators, including pH, TDS, DO, BOD, COD, TP, TN, ON, NH3, SO4, NO3, Fe, Mn, O&G, and F, were assessed. The results display the WQI for the surface water monitoring sites measured in 2021 as good grade, exempting of S8, which show bad water quality index. The computed minimum, maximum, and average ± standard deviation for the WQI were 35 (good), 65 (poor), and (41 ± 7.5) (good). For S2 records, BOD concentrations were slightly above the Egyptian limit (6 mg/L), whereas S8 recorded a slight increase in Fe, Mn, and F compared to permissible concentrations. The minimum, maximum, and (average ± standard deviation) for TDS were 258.08, 318, and (249 ± 18.2) mg/L, respectively, indicating accepted quality for irrigation usage, but it should be purified before being used for drinking purposes. Water quality parameters had improved noticeably from 2014 to 2021, especially within the following sites: S1, S4, S5, S7, S9, and S10, probably due to the decrease in industrial activities during the epidemic and its illegal discharge of wastewater to the streams. The main factors contributing to the reduction in surface water quality in S8 are likely to be untreated illegal sewage discharge, inadequate industrial wastewater, and urban runoff discharge. Monitoring surface water quality is essential if water resource managers have to achieve sustainable development objectives. Management of surface water quality is a crucial step in assisting managers of water resources to accomplish their objectives for sustainable development. Future efforts to link water quality to United Nations-Water Sustainable Development Goal 6 are necessary and advised given that the research region serves as Egypt's main strategic water source and the economic and ecological hub of the Nile.
Data availability
The data are not available.
References
Abdel-Fatteh M, Abd-Elmabod S, Aldosari A, Elrys A, Mohamed E (2020) Multivariate analysis for assessing irrigation water quality: a case study of the Bahr Mouise Canal, eastern Nile Delta. Water 12:2537. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12092537
Abdelhafiz MA, Elnazer AA, Seleem EM, Mostafa A, Al-Gamal AG, Salman SA, Feng X (2021) Chemical and bacterial quality monitoring of the Nile River water and associated health risks in Qena-Sohag sector, Egypt. Environ Geochem Health 43(10):4089–4104
Abdo M, Ahmed H, Helal M, Fekry M, Abdelhamid A (2022) Water quality index and environmental assessment of Rosetta Branch Aquatic System, Nile River, Egypt. Egypt J Chem 65(4):321–331. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejchem.2021.92605.4405
Abuzaid AS, Abdel-Salam MA, Ahmad AF, Fathy HA, Fadl ME, Scopa A (2022) Effect of marginal-quality irrigation on accumulation of some heavy metals (Mn, Pb, and Zn) in typic torripsamment soils and food crops. Sustainability 2(14):1067. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031067
ANZECC, ARMCANZ (2000) Australian and New Zealand guidelines for fresh and marine water quality, Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council and Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand, Canberra
Appelo CAJ, Postma D (2005) Geochemistry, groundwater and pollution, 2nd edn. CRC Press, London
Atta HS, Omar MAS, Tawfik AM (2022) Water quality index for assessment of drinking groundwater purpose case study: area surrounding Ismailia Canal, Egypt. J Eng Appl Sci 69:83. https://doi.org/10.1186/s44147-022-00138-9
Batabyal AK, Chakraborty S (2015) Hydrogeochemistry and water quality index in the assessment of groundwater quality for drinking uses. Water Environ Res 87:607–617. https://doi.org/10.2175/106143015X14212658613956
Bora M, Goswami DC (2017) Water quality assessment in terms of water quality index (WQI): case study of the Kolong River, Assam, India. Appl Water Sci 7(6):3125–3135
Brindha K, Neena Vaman KV, Srinivasan K, Sathis Babu M, Elango L (2014) Identification of surface water–groundwater interaction by hydrogeochemical indicators and assessing its suitability for drinking and irrigational purposes in Chennai, Southern India. Appl Water Sci 4:159–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-013-0138-6
Brkic Z, Kuhta M, Larva O, Gottstein S (2019) Groundwater and connected ecosystems: An overview of groundwater body status assessment in Croatia. Environ Sci Eur 31:75
Brown RM, McClelland NI, Deininger RA, Tozer RG (1970) A water quality index—Do we dare? Water Sew Works 117:339–343
CAPMAS (2015) Population Estimates by Sex & Governorate 1/1/2015. (PDF). CAPMAS. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2015-10-19. Retrieved 23 October 2016
CCME (1999) Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment. Canadian water quality guidelines for the protection of aquatic life: CCME Water Quality Index, User’s Manual – 2017 Update. In: Canadian environmental quality guidelines, 1999, Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment, Winnipeg
Chandra SD, Asadi S, Sand Raju MVS (2017) Estimation of water quality index by weighted arithmetic water quality index method. Int J Civil Eng Technol 8(4):1215–1222
Das S, Nag SK (2015) Deciphering groundwater quality for irrigation and domestic purposes—a case study in Suri I and II blocks, Birbhum District, West Bengal, India. J Earth Syst Sci 124:965–992. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-015-0583-8
Egypt Decree No.458 (2007) Drinking water quality standards. Ministry of Health and Population in Arabic, Egypt
El-Amier YA, Elsayed A, El-Esawi MA, Noureldeen A, Darwish H, Fakhry H (2021) Optimizing the biosorption behavior of Ludwigia stolonifera in the removal of lead and chromium metal ions from synthetic wastewater. Sustainability 13:6390
Ellis RA, Murphy JG, Markovic MZ, Vandenboer TC, Makar PA, Brook J, Mihele C (2011) The influence of gas-particle partitioning and surface atmosphere exchange on ammonia during BAQS-Met. Atmos Chem Phys 11:133–145
Ewaid SH, Abed SA, Kadhum SA (2018) Predicting the Tigris River water quality within Baghdad, Iraq by using water quality index and regression analysis. Environ Technol Innov 11:390–398
Fernández FG, Terry RE, Coronel EG (2015) Nitrous oxide emissions from anhydrous ammonia, urea, and polymer-coated urea in Illinois cornfields. J Environ Qual 44:415–422
Fu X, Wang SX, Ran LM, Pleim JE, Cooter E, Bash JO, Benson V, Hao JM (2015) (2015) Estimating NH3 emissions from agricultural fertilizer application in China using the bi-directional CMAQ model coupled to an agro-ecosystem model. Atmos Chem Phys 15:6637–6649
Gabr ME (2018) Evaluation of Irrigation Water, Drainage Water, Soil Salinity, and Groundwater for Sustainable Cultivation. Irrigat Drainage Syst Eng 7:224. https://doi.org/10.4172/2168-9768.1000224
Gabr ME (2020) Study of reclaimed water reuse standards and prospects in irrigation in Egypt. PSERJ 24:65–75
Gabr ME (2022) Design methodology for sewage water treatment system comprised of Imhoff ‘s tank and a subsurface horizontal flow constructed wetland: a case study Dakhla Oasis. Egypt J Environ Sci Health Part A 57(1):52–64
Gabr ME (2023) Land reclamation projects in the Egyptian Western Desert: management of 15 million acres of groundwater irrigation. Water Int 48(2):240–258
Gabr ME, Soussa H, Fattouh E (2021) Groundwater quality evaluation for drinking and irrigation uses in Dayrout city Upper Egypt. Ain Shams Eng J 12:327–340
Gad M, Saleh AH, Hussein H, Farouk M, Elsayed S (2022) Appraisal of surface water quality of Nile River using water quality indices, spectral signature and multivariate modeling. Water 14:1131. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14071131
Kamboj N, Kamboj V (2019) Water quality assessment using overall index of pollution in riverbed-mining area of Ganga-River Haridwar. India Water Sci 33(1):65–74
Egyptian Law (48/1982) The Implementer Regulations for Law 48/1982 Regarding the Protection of the River Nile and Water Ways from Pollution (in Arabic). https://www.mwri.gov.eg/index.php/ministry/ministry-17/12-1984
https://www.wur.nl/en/Research-Results/Research-Institutes/Economic-Research/show-wecr/Research-into-the-impacts-of-COVID-19-onthe-agriculture-sector.htm. Assessed on 10 January 2023
https://www.oecd.org/coronavirus/policy-responses/covid-19-andthe-food-and-agriculture-sector-issues-and-policy-responses-a23f764b/. Assessed on 10 January 2023
https://unsdg.un.org/sites/default/files/2020-08/EGY_Socioeconomic-Response-Plan_2020.pdf. Assessed on 20 January 2023
MEFD (2017) Ministry of Environment and Food of Denmark Ministerial Order on Water Quality and Monitoring of Water Supply Plants. Available online: https://www.retsinformation.dk/Forms/R0710.aspx?id=180348. Accessed on 6 January 2023
Megahed HA, GabAllah HM, AbdelRahman MAE, D’Antonio P, Scopa A, Darwish MH (2022) Geomatics-based modeling and hydrochemical analysis for groundwater quality mapping in the Egyptian Western Desert: a case study of El-Dakhla Oasis. Water 14:4018. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14244018
Mohammed AM, Refaee A, El-Din GK et al (2022) Hydro-chemical characteristics and quality assessment of shallow groundwater under intensive agriculture practices in arid region, Qena. Egypt Appl Water Sci 12:92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-022-01611-9
Nihalani S, Meeruty A (2021) Water quality index evaluation for major rivers in Gujarat. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:63523–63531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10509-5
Noori R, Berndtsson R, Hosseinzadeh M, Adamowski JF, Abyaneh MR (2019) A critical review on the application of the national sanitation foundation water quality index. Environ Pollut 244:575–587
Nouhaila M, Abdeslam T, Nihal B, Badr EF, Mohammed M, Ali EB (2022) Quality assessment of surface and sediment pore waters and their behaviours using WQI index and geostatistics approaches: Case study: El Malleh dam reservoir, Morocco. Geocarto Int 1:1–27
Oregon CG (2001) Water quality index a tool for evaluating water quality management effectiveness. JAWRA 37:125–137. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2001.tb05480.x
Pesce SF, Wunderlin DA (2000) Use of water quality indices to verify the impact of Córdoba city (Argentina) on Suquı́a River. Water Res 34:2915–2926
Schullehner J, Stayner L, Hansen B (2017) Nitrate, nitrite, and ammonium variability in drinking water distribution systems. Int J Environ Res Public Health 9(3):276. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14030276
SDGR (2022) The Sustainable Development Goals Report. United Nation. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2022/The-Sustainable-Development-Goals-Report-2022.pdf
SDGs (2014) The 17 GOALS Sustainable Development. https://sdgs.un.org/goals. Assessed on December 2022
Seifi A, Dehghani M, Singh VP (2020) Uncertainty analysis of water quality index (WQI) for groundwater quality evaluation: application of Monte-Carlo method for weight allocation. Ecol Indic 117:106653
Sener S, Sener E, Davraz A (2017) Evaluation of water quality using water quality index (WQI) method and GIS in Aksu River (SW-Turkey). Sci Total Environ 584:131–144
Shil S, Singh UK, Mehta P (2019) Water quality assessment of a tropical river using water quality index (WQI), multivariate statistical techniques and GIS. Appl Water Sci 9:168
Slathia N, Langer S, Jasrotia R (2023) Assessment of water quality and its effect on prawn abundance in three tributaries of Shiwalik rivers: Chenab and Ravi of Jammu, India—a case study. Appl Water Sci 13:77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-023-01882-w
Soumaia M, Asma E, Nesrine N, Rajouene M (2022) Estimation of irrigation water quality index in a semi-arid environment using data-driven approach. Water Supply 22(5):5161. https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2022.157
Sun W, Xia C, Xu M, Guo J, Sun G (2016) Application of modified water quality indices as indicators to assess the spatial and temporal trends of water quality in the Dongjiang River. Ecol Indic 66:306–312
Tarek S, Mohamed GE (2022) Impact of COVID-19 lockdown on small-scale farming in Northeastern Nile Delta of Egypt and learned lessons for water conservation potentials. Ain Shams Eng J 13(4):101649
Wang J, Yan H, Xin K et al (2020) Risk assessment methodology for iron stability under water quality factors based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation. Environ Sci Eur 32:81. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-020-00356-z
WHO (2011) World Health Organization. Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality, 4th ed. World Health Organization; Geneva, pp 398–403
Yıldız S, Karakuş CB (2020) Estimation of irrigation water quality index with development of an optimum model: a case study. Environ Dev Sustain 22:4771–4786. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-019-00405-5
Zaman M, Shahid SA, Heng L (2018) Guideline for salinity assessment, mitigation and adaptation using nuclear and related techniques null. Springer, Cham
Zhou G, Zhang W, Ma L et al (2016) Effects of saline water irrigation and N application rate on NH3 volatilization and N use efficiency in a drip-irrigated cotton field. Water Air Soil Pollut 227:103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-016-2806-2
Acknowledgements
The Ministry of Water Resources and Irrigation (MWRI) and the Holding Company for Water and Waste Water (HCWW) are acknowledged by the authors for their efforts in providing the information, data, and resources.
Funding
Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB). This research received no external funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization, M.E.G. and H.S.; methodology, M.E.G. and H.S.; software, M.E.G. and H.S.; validation, M.E.G. and H.S.; formal analysis, M.E.G. and H.S.; investigation, M.E.G. and H.S.; resources, M.E.G. and H.S.; data curation, M.E.G. and H.S.; writing—original draft preparation, M.E.G.; writing—review and editing, M.E.G. and H.S.; visualization, M.E.G. and H.S.; supervision H.S.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Gabr, M.E., Soussa, H. Assessing surface water uses by water quality index: application of Qalyubia Governorate, Southeast Nile Delta, Egypt. Appl Water Sci 13, 181 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-023-01994-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-023-01994-3