Abstract
Aim-Background
One of the most common operations performed by general and paediatric surgeons is that of inguinal hernia repair. A rare complication of this surgery is injury to the vas deferens (vas), regardless of the surgical technique used. The aim of this article is to review current data regarding the consequences following vas injury and to provide surgeons, who operate in the inguinal canal, with all the current knowledge regarding appropriate treatment of the injured vas.
Methods
A systematic search was conducted through Pubmed, Embase, OVID, Medline, Cinahl and Google search engines to identify relevant reports.
Results
Vas injury can be the result of intraoperative manipulations or can be related to the mesh used for hernioplasty. A 0.1–0.53 % incidence of vas injury is reported in open inguinal hernia repairs. The most common consequences are spermatic granuloma formation, vas and epididymal epithelium dysfunction and testicular atrophy, unilateral or bilateral. The mechanism of bilateral testicular damage is mediated through the formation of sperm autoantibodies and sympathetic orchiopathia. The optical loupe-assisted modified one-layer anastomosis technique yields overall similar patency rates when compared with microsurgical techniques, and also has positive outcomes in terms of shorter operative time, less infrastructure and lower cost.
Conclusions
Immediate management of the injured vas requires a broad understanding of the consequences, advanced surgical skills, and liaison with specialists in this field. A therapeutic algorithm is proposed by the authors of this article.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Gong K, Zhang N, Lu Y, Zhu B, Zhang Z, Du D, et al. Comparison of the open tension-free mesh-plug, transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP), and totally extraperitoneal (TEPP) laparoscopic techniques for primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 2011;25:234–239
Brown CN, Finch JG. Which mesh for hernia repair? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2010;92:272–278
Ridway PF, Shah J, Darzi AW. Male genital tract injuries after contemporary inguinal hernia repair. BJU Int 2002;90:272–276
Australian Government — National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC). NHMRC levels of evidence and grades for recommendations for developers quidelines [Internet]. 2009 [cited 2009 Dec]. Available from: http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/_files_nhmrc/file/guidelines/evidence_statement_form.pdf
Patrick DA, Bensard DD, Karrer FM, Ruyle SZ. Is routine pathologic evaluation of pediatric hernia sacs justified? J Pediatr Surg 1998;33:1090–1092
Steigman CK, Sotelo-Avila C, Weber TR. The incidence of spermatic cord structures in inguinal hernia sacs from male children. Am J Surg Pathol 1999;23:880–885
Siddiqui K, Nazir Z, Ali SS, Pervaliz S. Is routine histological evaluation of pediatric hernia sac necessary? Pediatr Surg Int 2004;20:133–135
Vogels HD, Bruijen CJ, Beasle SW. Establishing benchmarks for the outcome of herniotomy in children. Br J Surg 2010;97:1135–1139
Yang C, Zhang H, Pu J, Mei H, Zheng L, Tong Q. Laparoscopic vs open herniorrhaphy in the management of pediatric inguinal hernia: a systemic review and meta-analysis. J Pediatr Surg 2011;46:1824–1834
Hassan ME, Mustafawi AR. Laparoscopic flip-flap technique versus conventional inguinal hernia repair in children. JSLS 2007;11:90–93
Endo M, Watanabe T, Nakano M, Yoshida F, Ukiyama E. Laparoscopic completely extraperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia in children: a single-institute experience with 1257 repairs compared with cut-down herniorrhaphy. Surg Endosc 2009;23:1706–1712
Berndsen FH, Bjursten LM, Simanaitis M, Montgomery A. Does mesh implantation affect the spermatic cord structures after inguinal hernia surgery? An experimental study in rats. Eur Surg Res 2004;36:318–322
The EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration. Repair of groin hernia with synthetic mesh meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg 2002;235:322–332
Schiegel PN. Causes of azoospermia and their management. Reprod Fertil Dev 2004;16:561–572
Chintamani, Khandelwal R, Tandon M, Kumar Y. Isolated unilateral duplication of vas deferens, a surgical enigma: a case report and review of the literature. Cases Journal 2009;2:167
Damle S, Cothren CC, Moore EE, Kim FJ. Double Trouble: Duplication of Vas Deferens Encountered During Inguinal Hernia Repair. J Am Coll Surg 2005;201:141
Karaman A, Karaman I, Yagiz B, Cavusoglu YH. Partial duplication of vas deferens: How important is it? J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg 2010;15:135–.
Fieder U, Siegmann S, Kelami A. Experimental studies on the reaction of the vas deferens to different traumata. Andrologia 1978;10:473–478
Shandling B, Janik JS. The vulnerability of the vas deferens. J Pediatr Surg 1981;16:461–464
Abasiyanik A, Guvenc H, Yavuzer D, Peker O, Ince U. The effect of iatrogenic vas deferens injury on fertility in an experimental rat model J Pediatr Surg 1997;32:1144–1146
Janik JS, Shandling B. The vulnerability of the vas deferens (II): the case against routine bilateral inguinal exploration. J Pediatr Surg 1982;17:585–588
Sabanegh ES, Samplaski MK, Talavera F, Wolf JS, Kim ED. Vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy [Internet]. 2011 [updated 2011 Nov 12]. Available from: http://www.emedicine.medscape.com/article/452831-overview
Reinpold WM, Nehls S, Eggert A. Nerve management and chronic pain after open inguinal hernia repair: a prospective two phase study. Ann Surg 2011;254:163–168
Maciel LC, Glina S, Palma PC, Nascimento LF, Netto NR Jr. Histopathological alterations of the vas deferens in rats exposed to polypropylene mesh. BJU Int 2007;100:187–190
Uzzo RG, Lemack GE, Morrissey KP, Goldstein M. The effects of mesh bioprosthesis on the spermatic cord structures: a preliminary report in a carine model. J Urol 1999;161:1344–1349
Shin D, Lipshultz LI, Golstein M, Barme GA, Fuchs EF, Nagler HM, et al. Herniorrhaphy with polypropylene mesh causing inguinal vassal obstruction: a preventable cause of obstructive azoospermia. Ann Surg 2005;241:553–558
Thapa PB, Maharian DK, Pudasaini S, Sharma SK. Inguinal vassal obstruction following polypropylene mesh repair. JNMA 2009;48:168–169
Kolbe T, Hollinsky C, Walter I, Joachim A, Rulicke T. Influence of a new self-gripping hernia mesh on male fertility in a rat model. Surg Endos. 2010;24:455–461
Junge K, Binnebosel M, Rosch R, Ottinger A, Stumpf M, Muhlenbruch G, et al. Influence of mesh materials on the integrity of the vas deferens following Lichtenstein Hernioplasty: an experimental model. Hernia 2008;12:621–626
Ceylan H, Karakok M, Guldur E, Cengiz B, Bagci c, Mir E. Temporary stretch of the testicular pedicle may damage the vas deferens and the testis. J Pediatr Surg 2003;38:1530–1533
Sheynkin YR, Hendin BN, Schlegel PN, Goldstein M. Mcrosurgical repair of iatrogenic injury to the vas deferens. J Urol 1998;159:139–141
Sandu DP, Osborn DE. Surgical technique for inguinal surgery and its effect on fertility in the Wistar rat model. Br J Urol 1991;68:513–517
Deane LA, Suding PN, Lekawa ME, Narula N, McDougall EM. Sperm granuloma of the inguinal vas deferens mimicking recurrent incarcerated inguinal hernia. Urology 2007;69:1209–1213
Itoh M, Xie Q, Miyamoto K, Takeuchi Y. Major differences between the testis and epididymis in the induction of granulomas in response to extravasated germ cells. I. A light microscopical study in mice. Int J Androl 1999;22:316–323
Silich RC, McSherry CK. Spermatic granuloma. An uncommon complication of the tension-free hernia repair. Surg Endosc 1996;10:537–539
Magheli A, Schulze W, Weiske WH, Kempkensteffen C, Miller K, Hinz S. Evaluation of obstructive interval, presence of sperm granulomas and patient age as predictors of spermatogenesis in a cohort of men undergoing vasectomy reversal. Aktuelle Urol 2010;41:52–57
Pampal A, Ozen IO, Ekingen G, Demirogullari B, Helvacioglu F, Take G. The morphological evaluation of ipsilteral and contralateral vasa deferentia in a rat model of unilateral spermatic cord torsio. Pediatr Surg Int. 2010;26:287–292
Ren L, Weng Q, Kishimoto M, Watanabe G, Jaroenporn S, Taya K. Effect of short period vasectomy on FSH, LH, inhibin and testosterone secretion, ans sperm motility in adult male rats. Exp Anim 2011;60:47–58
Gubin DA, Dmochowski R, Kutteh WH. Multivariant analysis of men from infertile couples with and without antisperm antibodies. Am J Reprod Immunol 1998;39:157–160
Whyte J, Sarrat R, Cisneros AI, Whyte A, Mazo R, Torres A, et al. The vasectomized testis. Int Surg 2000;85:167–174
Chehval MJ, Martin SA, Alexander NJ, Winkelmann T. The effect of unilateral injury to the vas deferens on the contralateral testis in immature and adult rats. J Urol 1995;153:1313–1315
West D, Chehval MJ, Winkelmann T, Martin SA. Effect of vasovasostomy on contralateral testicular damage associated with unilateral vasectomy in mature and immature Lewis rats. Fertil Steril 2000;73:238–241
Lee R, Goldstein M, Ullery BW, Ehrlich J, Soares M, Razzano RA, et al. Value of serum antisperm antibodies in diagnosing obstructive azoospermia. J Urol 2009;181:264–269
Ozturk U, Ozdemir E, Dede O, Sagnak L, Gotkug HN, Gurbuz OA, et al. Assessment of anti-sperm antibodies in couples after testicular sperm extraction. Clin Invest Med 2011;34:179–183
Flickinger CJ, Vagnetti M, Howard SS, Herr JC. Antisperm autoantibody response is reduced by early repair of severed vas deferens in the juvenile rat. Fertil Steril 2000;73:229–237
Pedersen J. Prefertile vas lesion as a cause of sperm antibody formation: an experimental and clinical study. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl 1987;106 1–38
Chehval MJ, Doshi R, Kidd CF, Winkelmann T, Chehval V. Antisperm autoantibody response after unilateral vas deferens ligation in rats: when does it develop? J Androl 2002;23:669–673
Pampai A, Ozen IO, Ekingen G, Demirogullari B, Helvacioglu F, Take G. The morphological evaluation of ipsilateral and contralateral vasa deferentia in a rat model of unilateral spermatic cord torsion. Pediatr Surg Int 2010;26:287–292
Kutlu O, Kocabiyik A, Koksal IT, Guntekin E. Effects of Chemical Sympathectomy on Contralateral Testicular Histology and Fertility in Unilateral Vasectomy. J Korean Med Sci 2009;24:849–852
Schaefer U, Machida T, Vorlova S, Strickland S, Levi R. The plasminogen activator system modulates sympathetic nerve functio. JEM 2006;203:2191–2200
Abdeimassih V, Balmaceda JP, Tesarik J, Abdelmassih R, Nagy ZP. Relationship between time period after vasectomy and reproductive capacity of sperm obtained by epididymal aspiration. Hum Reprod 2002;17:736–740
Thimon V, Calvo E, Koukoui O, Légaré C, Sullivan R. Effects of vasectomy on gene expression profiling along the human epididymis. Biol Reprod 2008;79:262–273
Lavers AE, Swanlund DJ, Hunter BA, Tran ML, Pryor JL, Roberts KP. Acute effect of vasectomy on function of the rat epididymal epithelium and vas deferens. J Andrl 2006;27:826–836
Turner TT, Riley TA, Mruk DD, Cheng CY. Obstruction of the vas deferens alters protein secretion by the rat caput epididymidal epithelium in vivo. J Androl 1999;20:289–297
Turner TT, Riley TA, Vagnetti M, Flickinger CJ, Caldwell JA, Hunt DF. Postvasectomy alterations in protein synthesis and secretion in the rat caput epididymidis are not repaired after vasovasostomy. J Androl 2000;21:276–290
Matsuda T. Diagnosis and treatment of post-herniorrhaphy vas deferens obstruction. Int J Urol 2000;7:35–38
Yavetz H, Harash B, Yogev L, Homonnai ZT, Paz G. Fertility of men following inguinal hernia repair. Andrologia 1991;23:443–446
Bolduc S, Fischer MA, Deceuninck G, Thabet M. Factors predicting overall success: a review of 747 microsurgical vasovasostomies. Can Urol Assoc J 2007;1:388–394
Chen B, Zhang ZG, Wang HX, Wang YB, Hu K, Jin Y, et al. Standarized diagnosis and treatment of azoospermia: a report of 1027 cases. Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao 2010;42:409–412
Wood S, Montazeri N, Sajjad Y, Troup S, Kingsland CR, Lewis-Jones DI. Current practice in the management of vasectom reversal and unobstructive azoospermia in Merseyside & North Wales: a questionnaire-based survey. BJU 2003;91:839–844
Kim HH, Goldstein M. History of vasectomy reversal. Urol Clin North Am 2009;36:359–373
Sheynkin YR, Li PS, Magid ML, Carison D, Chen EC, Goldstein M. Comparison of absorbable and nonabsorbable sutures for microsurgical vasovasostomy in rats. Urology 1999;53:1235–1238
Busato WF Jr, Marquetti AM, Rocha LC. Comparison of vasovasostomy with conventional microsurgical suture and fibrin adhesive in rats. Int Braz J Urol 2007;33:829–836
Shairo CE. Modified one-layer, nonstented, microsurgical vasovasostomy. Surg Technol Int 1995;4:257–260
Kumar R, Mukherjee S. “4*4 vasovasostomy”: A simplified technique for vasectomy reversal 2010;26:350–352
Fox M. Comparison of modified one- and two-layer microsurgical vasovasostomy. BJUI 2001;87:278–281
Hsieh ML, Huang HC, Chen Y, Huang ST, Chang PL. Loupeassisted vs microsurgical technique for modified one-layer vasovasostomy: Is the microsurgery really better? BJU Int 2005;96:864–866
Jee SH, Hong YK. One-layer vasovasostomy: microsurgical versus loupe-assisted. Fertil Steril 2010;94:2308–2311
Gopi SS, Townell NH. Vasectomy reversal: Is the microscope really essential? Scott Med J 2007;52:18–20
Glick PL, Boulanger SC. Inguinal Hernias and Hydroceles. In: Grosfeld JL, O’Neill JA, Fonkalsrud EW, Coran A. Pediatric Surgery. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Mosby; 2006
Marmar JL. Techniques for microsurgical reconstruction of obstructive azoospermia. Indian J Urol 2011;27:86–91
Feber KM, Ruiz HE. Vasovasostomy: Macroscopic approach and retrospective review. Tech Urol 1999;5:8–11
Friedrich MG, Friedrich E, Graefen M, Heinzer H, Michl U, Huland H, et al. Success rates of two-layer, microsurgical vasovasostomy. Results from a patient questionnaire and comparison with one-layer technique. Aktuelle Urol 2006;37:58–63.
Portillo Martin JA, Correas Gamez MA, Rado Velizquez MA, Antolin Juarez F, Gutierrez Banos JL, Del Valle Schaan JI, et al. Vasovasostomy: our experience. Arch Esp Urol 2005;58:1041–1048
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Blouchos, K., Boulas, K.A., Tselios, D.G. et al. Iatrogenic vas deferens injury due to inguinal hernia repair. Hellenic J Surg 84, 356–363 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13126-012-0052-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13126-012-0052-7