Abstract
A nonlinear wave alternative for the standard Black-Scholes option-pricing model is presented. The adaptive-wave model, representing controlled Brownian behavior of financial markets, is formally defined by adaptive nonlinear Schrödinger (NLS) equations, defining the option-pricing wave function in terms of the stock price and time. The model includes two parameters: volatility (playing the role of dispersion frequency coefficient), which can be either fixed or stochastic, and adaptive market potential that depends on the interest rate. The wave function represents quantum probability amplitude, whose absolute square is probability density function. Four types of analytical solutions of the NLS equation are provided in terms of Jacobi elliptic functions, all starting from de Broglie’s plane-wave packet associated with the free quantum-mechanical particle. The best agreement with the Black-Scholes model shows the adaptive shock-wave NLS-solution, which can be efficiently combined with adaptive solitary-wave NLS-solution. Adjustable ‘weights’ of the adaptive market-heat potential are estimated using either unsupervised Hebbian learning or supervised Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm. In the case of stochastic volatility, it is itself represented by the wave function, so we come to the so-called Manakov system of two coupled NLS equations (that admits closed-form solutions), with the common adaptive market potential, which defines a bidirectional spatio-temporal associative memory.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Realistic modeling of a global financial market represents a global cognitive computation task [1], which has many characteristics of a human brain [2] and its associative processing of information [3]. This enormously complex dynamical system can be observed from a multi-modular cognitive machine perspective [4], or human-like machine intelligence perspective [5], or machine consciousness perspective [6, 7].
In the subdomain of classical financial option-pricing, the celebrated Black-Scholes partial differential equation (PDE) describes the time-evolution of the market value of a stock option [8, 9]. Formally, for a function u = u(t, s) defined on the domain 0 ≤ s < ∞, 0 ≤ t ≤ T and describing the market value of a stock option with the stock (asset) price s, the Black-Scholes PDE can be written (using the physicist notation: ∂ z u = ∂u/∂z) as a diffusion-type equation:
where σ > 0 is the standard deviation, or volatility of s, r is the short-term prevailing continuously compounded risk-free interest rate, and T > 0 is the time of maturity of the stock option. In this formulation, it is assumed that the underlying (typically the stock) follows a geometric Brownian motion with ‘drift’ μ and volatility σ, given by the stochastic differential equation (SDE) [10]
where W is the standard Wiener process.
The economic ideas behind the Black-Scholes option pricing theory translated to the stochastic methods and concepts are as follows (see [11]). First, the option price depends on the stock price and this is a random variable evolving with time. Second, the efficient market hypothesis [12, 13], i.e., the market incorporates instantaneously any information concerning future market evolution, implies that the random term in the stochastic equation must be delta-correlated. That is: speculative prices are driven by white noise. It is known that any white noise can be written as a combination of the derivative of the Wiener process [14] and white shot noise (see [15]). In this framework, the Black-Scholes option pricing method was first based on the geometric Brownian motion [8, 9], and it was lately extended to include white shot noise.
The Black-Sholes PDE (1) is usually derived from SDEs describing the geometric Brownian motion (2), with the stock-price solution given by:
In mathematical finance, derivation is usually performed using Itô lemma [16] (assuming that the underlying asset obeys the Itô SDE), while in physics it is performed using Stratonovich interpretation (assuming that the underlying asset obeys the Stratonovich SDE [17]) [11, 15].
The PDE (1) resembles the backward Fokker–Planck equation (also known as the Kolmogorov forward equation, in which the probabilities diffuse outwards as time moves forwards) that describes the time evolution of the probability density function p = p(t, x) for the position x of a particle, and can be generalized to other observables as well [18]. Its first use was statistical description of Brownian motion of a particle in a fluid. Applied to the option-pricing process p = p(t, s) with drift D 1 = D 1(t, s), diffusion D 2 = D 2(t, s) and volatility σ2, the forward Fokker–Planck equation reads:
The corresponding backward Fokker–Planck equation (which is probabilistic diffusion in reverse, i.e., starting at the final forecasts, the probabilities diffuse outward as time moves backward) reads:
The solution of the PDE (1) depends on boundary conditions, subject to a number of interpretations, some requiring minor transformations of the basic BS equation or its solution.
The basic Eq. 1 can be applied to a number of one-dimensional models of interpretations of prices given to u, e.g., puts or calls, and to s, e.g., stocks or futures, dividends, etc. The most important examples are European call and put options (see Fig. 1), defined by:
where erf(λ) is the (real-valued) error function, k denotes the strike price and δ represents the dividend yield. In addition, for each of the call and put options, there are five Greeks (see, e.g. [19]), or sensitivities of the option-price with respect to the following quantities:
-
1.
The stock price—Delta: \(\Updelta_{\rm Call}=\partial_{s}u_{\rm Call}\) and \(\Updelta_{\rm Put}=\partial_{s}u_{\rm Put};\)
-
2.
The interest rate—Rho: ρCall = ∂ r u Call and ρPut = ∂ r u Put;
-
3.
The volatility: VegaCall = ∂σ u Call and VegaPut = ∂σ u Put;
-
4.
The elapsed time since entering into the option—Theta: \(\Uptheta_{\rm Call}=\partial_{T}u_{\rm Call}\) and \(\Uptheta_{\rm Put}=\partial_{T}u_{\rm Put};\) and
-
5.
The second partial derivative of the option-price with respect to the stock price—Gamma: \(\Upgamma_{\rm Call}=\partial_{ss}u_{\rm Call}\) and \(\Upgamma_{\rm Put}=\partial_{ss}u_{\rm Put}\) .
In practice, the volatility σ is the least known parameter in (1), and its estimation is generally the most important part of pricing options. Usually, the volatility is given in a yearly basis, baselined to some standard, e.g., 252 trading days per year, or 360 or 365 calendar days. However, and especially after the 1987 crash, the geometric Brownian motion model and the BS formula were unable to reproduce the option price data of real markets.
The Black-Scholes model assumes that the underlying volatility is constant over the life of the derivative, and unaffected by the changes in the price level of the underlying. However, this model cannot explain long-observed features of the implied volatility surface such as volatility smile and skew, which indicate that implied volatility does tend to vary with respect to strike price and expiration. By assuming that the volatility of the underlying price is a stochastic process itself, rather than a constant, it becomes possible to model derivatives more accurately.
As an alternative, models of financial dynamics based on two-dimensional diffusion processes, known as stochastic volatility (SV) models [20], are being widely accepted as a reasonable explanation for many empirical observations collected under the name of ‘stylized facts’ [21]. In such models the volatility, that is, the standard deviation of returns, originally thought to be a constant, is a random process coupled with the return in an SDE of the form similar to (2), so that they both form a two-dimensional diffusion process governed by a pair of Langevin equations [20, 22, 23].
Using the standard Kolmogorov probability approach, instead of the market value of an option given by the Black-Scholes equation (1), we could consider the corresponding probability density function (PDF) given by the backward Fokker–Planck equation (see [15]). Alternatively, we can obtain the same PDF (for the market value of a stock option), using the quantum-probability formalism [24, 25], as a solution to a time-dependent linear Schrödinger equation for the evolution of the complex-valued wave ψ-function for which the absolute square, |ψ|2, is the PDF (see [26]).
In this paper, I will go a step further and propose a novel general quantum-probability based,Footnote 1 option-pricing model, which is both nonlinear (see [29–32]) and adaptive (see [33–36]). More precisely, I propose a quantum neural computation [37] approach to option price modeling, based on the nonlinear Schrödinger (NLS) equation with adaptive parameters.
Adaptive Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation Model
This new adaptive wave-form approach to financial option modeling is motivated by:
- 1.
-
2.
My adaptive path integral approach to human cognition [40–42];
- 3.
-
4.
My recent monograph: ‘Quantum Neural Computation’ [37], as well as papers on entropic crowd modeling based on the concept of controlled Brownian motion [46–48].
To satisfy both efficient and behavioral markets, as well as their essential nonlinear complexity, I propose an adaptive, wave-form, nonlinear and stochastic option-pricing model with stock price s, volatility σ and interest rate r. The model is formally defined as a complex-valued, focusing (1 + 1)–NLS equation, defining the option-price wave function ψ = ψ (s, t), whose absolute square |ψ (s, t)|2 represents the probability density function (PDF) for the option price in terms of the stock price and time. In natural quantum units, this NLS equation reads:
where dispersion frequency coefficient σ is the volatility (which can be either constant or stochastic process itself), while Landau coefficient β = β (r, w) represents the adaptive market potential, which is, in the simplest nonadaptive scenario, equal to the interest rate r, while in the adaptive case depends on the set of adjustable parameters {w i }. In this case, β (r, w) can be related to the market temperature (which obeys Boltzmann distribution [49]). The term V(ψ) = − β |ψ|2 represents the ψ − dependent potential field. Physically, the NLS Eq. 5 describes a nonlinear wave-packet defined by the complex-valued wave function ψ (s, t) of real space and time parameters. In the present context, the space-like variable s denotes the stock (asset) price.
Analytical NLS-Solution
NLS equation can be exactly solved using the power series expansion method [50, 51] of Jacobi elliptic functions [52].
In case of low interest-rate r, β(r) ≪ 1, V(ψ)→ 0, so Eq. 5 can be approximated by a linear wave packet, defined by a continuous superposition of de Broglie’s plane waves, associated with a free quantum particle. This linear wave packet is defined by the linear Schrö dinger equation with zero potential energy (in natural units):
Thus, we consider the ψ-function describing a single de Broglie’s plane wave, with the wave number (or, momentum) k and circular frequency ω:
Its substitution into the linear Schrödinger Eq. 6 gives the linear harmonic oscillator ODE, whose eigenvalues are natural frequencies of (6), and the solution is given by a Fourier sine or cosine series (see, e.g. [53, 54]). This linear quantum-mechanical approach to low interest-rate option-pricing evolution has been elaborated elsewhere [55].
Similarly, substituting (7) into the NLS Eq. 5, we obtain a nonlinear oscillator ODE:
Following [51], I suppose that a solution ϕ (ξ) for (8) can be obtained as a linear expansion
where sn(s) = sn(s, m) are Jacobi elliptic sine functions with elliptic modulus \(m\in \lbrack 0,1]\) , such that \(\hbox{sn} (s,0)=\sin (s)\) and \(\hbox{sn}(s,1)= \tanh (s)\).Footnote 2 Using standard identities with associated elliptic cosine functions cn(ξ) and elliptic functions of the third kind dn(ξ), we have
Substituting (9) and (10) into (8), after doing some algebra, we get
which, substituted into the nonlinear oscillator (8), gives
Using the substitutions (7) and (11), we now obtain the exact periodic solution of (5) as
where (12) defines the general solution (see Fig. 2), while (13) defines the envelope shock-wave Footnote 3 (or, ‘dark soliton’) solution (Fig. 3) of the NLS Eq. 5. The same shock-wave solution with stochastic volatility σ t (defined as a simple random walk) is given in Fig. 4.
Alternatively, if we seek a solution ϕ(ξ) as a linear expansion of Jacobi elliptic cosine functions, such that cn(s, 0) = cos (s) and cn(s, 1) = sech(s),Footnote 4 in a linear form:
then we get
where (14) defines the general solution (Fig. 5), while (15) defines the envelope solitary-wave (or, ‘bright soliton’) solution (Fig. 6, 7) of the NLS Eq. 5. The same soliton solution with stochastic volatility σ t (a simple random walk) is given in Fig. 4.
In all four solution expressions (12), (13), (14) and (15), the adaptive potential β(w) is yet to be calculated using either unsupervised Hebbian learning, or supervised Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm (see, e.g. [56, 57]). In this way, the NLS Eq. 5 resembles the ‘quantum stochastic-filtering neural network’ model of [58–60]. While the authors of the prior quantum neural network performed only numerical (finite-difference) simulations of their model, this paper provides theoretic foundation (of both single NLS network and coupled NLS network) with closed-form analytical solutions. Any kind of numerical analysis can be easily performed using above closed-form solutions ψ i (s, t), (i = 1, ..., 4).
Fitting the Black-Scholes Model Using Adaptive NLS-PDF
The adaptive NLS-PDFs of the shock-wave type (13) can be used to fit the Black-Scholes call and put options. Specifically, I have used the spatial part of (13),
where the adaptive market-heat potential β (r, w) is chosen as:
The following parameter estimates were obtained using 100 iterations of the Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm. In case of the call option fit (see Fig. 8), n = 5,
-
w 11 = 24.8952, w 12 = −78112.3, w 13 = −48178.3,
-
w 21 = 24.8951, w 22 = −78112.3, w 23 = −48178.3,
-
w 31 = 24.895, w 32 = −78112.3, w 33 = −48178.3,
-
w 41 = −37.3927, w 42 = −3108.08, w 43 = −1520633,
-
w 51 = −37.2757, w 52 = −3968.35, w 53 = −159782.
-
σ callNLS = −0.119341σBS, k callNLS = 0.0156422k BS, T callNLS = 15.6423T BS.
In case of the put option fit (see Fig. 9), n = 3,
-
w 1 a = 0.000222367, w 1 b = 82032.8, w 1 c = 63876.9,
-
w 2 a = −0.428113, w 2 b = 439.148, w 2 c = 205780.0,
-
w 3 a = 4.70615, w 3 b = 27.1558, w 3 c = 139805.0
-
σput NLS = −0.003444σBS, k put NLS = −3.10354k BS, T put NLS = −3103.54T BS.
As can be seen from Fig. 9, there is a kink near s = 100. This kink, which is a natural characteristic of the spatial shock-wave (16), can be smoothed out by taking the sum of the spatial parts of the shock-wave NLS-solution (13) and the soliton NLS-solution (15) as:
In this case, using 100 iterations of the Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm, the following parameter estimates were obtained:
-
w 11 = −0.00190885, w 12 = 6798.78, w 13 = 5329.46,
-
w 21 = 18.1757, w 22 = 23.5253, w 23 = 18354.9,
-
w 31 = −71.7315, w 32 = 4.15999, w 33 = 12807.2,
-
d1 = 0.345078, d2 = −12.3948.
-
σ putNLS = −0.247932BS, k putNLS = 0.260764k BS, T putNLS = 260.764T BS.
The adaptive NLS-based Greeks can now be defined, using β = r and above modified (σ, k, t) values, by the following partial derivatives of the spatial part of the shock-wave solution (13):
where abs′(z) denotes the partial derivative of the absolute value upon the corresponding variable z.
Coupled Adaptive NLS-System for Volatility + Option-Price Evolution Modeling
For the purpose of including a controlled stochastic volatility Footnote 5 into the adaptive-wave model (5), the full bidirectional quantum neural computation model for option price forecasting can be represented as a self-organized system of two coupled self-focusing NLS equations: one defining the option-price wave function ψ = ψ (s, t) and the other defining the volatility wave function σ = σ (s, t). The two NLS equations are coupled so that the volatility σ is a parameter in the option-price NLS, while the option-price ψ is a parameter in the volatility NLS. In addition, both processes evolve in a common self-organizing market heat potential, so they effectively represent an adaptively controlled Brownian behavior of a hypothetical financial market.
Formally, I here propose an adaptive, symmetrically coupled, volatility + option-pricing model (with interest rate r and Hebbian learning rate c), which represents a bidirectional spatio-temporal associative memory. The model is defined by the following coupled-NLS+Hebb system:
In this coupled model, the σ-NLS (19) governs the (s, t)—evolution of stochastic volatility, which plays the role of a nonlinear coefficient in (20); the ψ-NLS (20) defines the (s, t)—evolution of option price, which plays the role of a nonlinear coefficient in (19). The purpose of this coupling is to generate a leverage effect, i.e. stock volatility is (negatively) correlated to stock returnsFootnote 6 (see, e.g. [62]). The w-ODE (21) defines the (σ , ψ)—coupling-based continuous Hebbian learning with the learning rate c. The adaptive market-heat potential β (r, w), previously defined by (17), is now generalized into a scalar product of the ‘synaptic weight’ vector w i and the Gaussian kernel vector g i , yet to be defined.
The bidirectional associative memory model (19)–(21) effectively performs quantum neural computation [37], by giving a spatio-temporal and quantum generalization of Kosko’s BAM family of neural networks [63, 64]. In addition, the shock-wave and solitary-wave nature of the coupled NLS equations may describe brain-like effects frequently occurring in financial markets: volatility/price propagation, reflection and collision of shock and solitary waves (see [65]).
The coupled NLS-system (19), (20), without an embedded w-learning (i.e., for constant β = r – the interest rate), actually defines the well-known Manakov system, which was proven by S. Manakov in 1973 [66] to be completely integrable, by the existence of infinite number of involutive integrals of motion. It admits ‘bright’ and ‘dark’ soliton solutions. Manakov system has been used to describe the interaction between wave packets in dispersive conservative media, and also the interaction between orthogonally polarized components in nonlinear optical fibers (see, e.g. [67, 68] and references therein).
The simplest solution of (19)–(20), the so-called Manakov bright 2-soliton, has the form resembling that of (15) and (Fig. 6) (see [69–75]), defined by:
where \({\bf \psi }_{{\rm sol}}(s,t)=\left( \begin{array}{c} \sigma (s,t)\\ \psi (s,t) \end{array} \right), {\bf c}=(c_{1},c_{2})^{T}\) is a unit vector such that |c 1|2 + |c 2|2 = 1. Real-valued parameters a and b are some simple functions of (σ, β, k), which can be determined by either Hebbian learning of Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm. Also, shock-wave solutions similar to (13) are derived in Appendix. We can argue that in some short-time financial situations, the adaptation effect (21) can be neglected, so our option-pricing model (19)–(20) can be reduced to the Manakov 2-soliton model (22), as depicted and explained in Fig. 11.
More complex exact soliton solutions have been derived for the Manakov system (19)–(20) with different procedures (see Appendix, as well as [76–78]). For example, in [76], using bright one-soliton solutions (of the type of (15)) of the system (19)–(20), many physical phenomena, such as unstable birefringence property, soliton trapping and daughter wave (‘shadow’) formation, were studied. Similarly, searching for modulation instabilities and homoclinic orbits was performed in [79–81]. In particular, local bifurcations of ‘wave and daughter waves’ from single-component waves have been studied in various forms of coupled NLS-systems, including the Manakov system (see [82] and references therein). Let us assume that a small volatility σ-component bifurcates from a pure option-price ψ-pulse. Thus, at the bifurcation point, the volatility component is infinitesimally small, while the option-price component is governed by the equation
whose homoclinic soliton solution is
A necessary condition for a local bifurcation of a homoclinic soliton solution with a small-amplitude volatility component from the option-price pulse (23) is that there is a nontrivial localized solution to the linearized problem of the σ-component. This takes the form of a linear Schrödinger equation
which can be solved exactly (see [83]), and for local bifurcation we require σ → 0 as |s|→ ± ∞.
As a final remark, numerical solution of the adaptive Manakov system (19)–(21), with any possible extensions, is quite straightforward, using the powerful numerical method of lines (see Appendix in [37]). Another possibility is Berger-Oliger adaptive mesh refinement when recursively numerically solving partial differential equations with wave-like solutions, using characteristic (double-null) grids (see [84] and reference therein).
Hebbian learning dynamics: analytical solution
Regarding the Hebbian learning (21) embedded into the Manakov system (19)–(20), suppose e.g. that we have N = 10 synaptic weights (in a single neural layer), with the learning rate c = 0.7. The zero-mean Gaussians are defined as:
where {σ i } are (−1, +1)-random standard deviations. Using random initial conditions, we get (by Mathematica of Maple ODE-solvers) the following analytical solutions of the Hebbian learning ODEs:
where erf(s) denotes the real-valued error function, while erfi(s) denotes the imaginary error function defined as: erf(i s)/i.
In this way, we get the alternative expression for adaptive market-heat potential: β (w) = r∑ Ni=1 w i g i , with interest rate r (see Fig. 12). Insertion of β (w), including the product |σ (s, t)||ψ (s, t)| calculated at time t into any Manakov solutions, gives the recursive QNN dynamics ψ (s, t + 1) for volatility and option-price forecasting at time t + 1. For example, an instant snapshot of the adaptive bright sech-soliton ψ4(s, t) is given in Fig. 13.
Conclusion
I have proposed a nonlinear adaptive–wave alternative to the standard Black-Scholes option pricing model. The new model, philosophically founded on adaptive markets hypothesis [38, 39] and Elliott wave market theory [43, 44], describes adaptively controlled Brownian market behavior, formally defined by adaptive NLS-equation. Four types of analytical solutions of the NLS equation are provided in terms of Jacobi elliptic functions, all starting from de Broglie’s plane waves associated with the free quantum-mechanical particle. The best agreement with the Black-Scholes model shows the adaptive shock-wave NLS-solution, which can be efficiently combined with adaptive solitary-wave NLS-solution. Adjustable ’weights’ of the adaptive market potential are estimated using either unsupervised Hebbian learning, or supervised Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm. For the case of stochastic volatility, it is itself represented by the wave function, so we come to the integrable Manakov system of two coupled NLS equations with the common adaptive potential, defining a bidirectional spatio-temporal associative memory machine.
As depicted in most Figures in this paper, the presented adaptive-wave model, both the single NLS-equation (5) and the coupled NLS-system (19)–(21), which represents a bidirectional associative memory, is a spatio-temporal dynamical system of great nonlinear complexity (see [36]), much more complex then the Black-Scholes model. This makes the new wave model harder to analyze, but at the same time, its immense variety is potentially much closer to the real financial market complexity, especially at the time of economic crisis abundant in shock-waves.
Finally, close in spirit to the adaptive-wave model is the method of adaptive wavelets in modern signal processing (see [85] and references therein, as well as [37] for an overview), which could be used for various market dimensionality reduction, signals separation and denoising as well as optimization of discriminatory market information.
Notes
For example, the general pendulum equation:
$$ \alpha^{\prime \prime }(t,\phi )+\sin [\alpha (t,\phi )]=0 $$has the elliptic solution:
$$ \alpha (t,\phi )=2\sin ^{-1}\left[ \sin \left( {\frac{\phi}{2}}\right) \right] \hbox{sn}\left[ t,\sin ^{2}\left( {\frac{\phi} {2}}\right) \right] . $$A shock wave is a type of fast-propagating nonlinear disturbance that carries energy and can propagate through a medium (or, field). It is characterized by an abrupt, nearly discontinuous change in the characteristics of the medium. The energy of a shock wave dissipates relatively quickly with distance and its entropy increases. On the other hand, a soliton is a self-reinforcing nonlinear solitary wave packet that maintains its shape while it travels at constant speed. It is caused by a cancelation of nonlinear and dispersive effects in the medium (or, field).
A closely related solution of an anharmonic oscillator ODE:
$$ \phi^{\prime \prime }(s)+\phi (s)+\phi^{3}(s)=0 $$is given by
$$ \phi (s)=\sqrt{{\frac{2m}{1-2m}}} \hbox{cn}\left( \sqrt{1+{\frac{2m}{1-2m}}} s, m\right) . $$Controlled stochastic volatility here represents volatility evolving in a stochastic manner but within the controlled boundaries.
The hypothesis that financial leverage can explain the leverage effect was first discussed by F. Black [61].
The Manakov system (19)–(20) has the following Lax pair [86] representation:
$$ \begin{aligned} \partial_{x}\phi &=M\phi \hbox{ and }\partial_{t}\phi =B\phi , \hbox{ or }\partial_{x}B -\partial_{t}M=[M,B],\qquad \hbox{with}\\ M(\lambda )&=\left( \begin{array}{ccc} \hbox{i}\lambda & \psi_{1} & \psi_{2}\\ -\psi_{1} & \hbox{i}\lambda & 0 \\ -\psi_{2} & 0 & \hbox{i}\lambda \end{array} \right) \qquad \hbox{and}\\ B(\lambda )&= -\hbox{i}\left( \begin{array}{ccc} 2\lambda ^{2}-|\psi_{1}|^{2}-|\psi_{2}|^{2} & 2i\psi_{1}\lambda -\partial_{x}\psi_{1} & 2i\psi_{2}\lambda -\partial_{x}\psi_{2}\\ -2i\psi_{1}^{\ast }\lambda -\partial_{x}\psi_{1}^{\ast } & -2\lambda ^{2}+|\psi_{1}|^{2} & \psi_{1}^{\ast }\psi_{2} \\ -2i\psi_{2}^{\ast }\lambda -\partial_{x}\psi_{2}^{\ast } & \psi_{1}\psi_{2}^{\ast } & -2\lambda ^{2}+|\psi_{2}|^{2} \end{array} \right). \end{aligned} $$(25)
References
Hussain A (2009) Cognitive computation: an introduction. Cogn Comput 1:1–3
Gurney KN (2009) Reverse engineering the vertebrate brain: methodological principles for a biologically grounded programme of cognitive modelling. Cogn Comput 1:29–41
Haikonen POA (2009) The role of associative processing in cognitive computing. Cogn Comput 1:42–49
Taylor JG (2009) Cognitive computation. Cogn Comput 1:4–16
McClelland JL (2009) Is a machine realization of truly human-like intelligence achievable?. Cogn Comput 1:17–21
Aleksander I (2009) Designing conscious systems. Cogn Comput 1:22–28
Seth A (2009) Explanatory correlates of consciousness: theoretical and computational challenges. Cogn Comput 1:50–63
Black F, Scholes M (1973) The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. J Pol Econ 81:637–659
Merton RC (1973) Theory of rational option pricing. Bell J Econ Manage Sci 4:141–183
Osborne MFM (1959) Brownian motion in the stock market. Oper Res 7:145–173
Perello J, Porra JM, Montero M, Masoliver J (2000) Black-Scholes option pricing within Ito and Stratonovich conventions. Physica A 278(1–2): 260–274
Fama E (1965) The behavior of stock market prices. J Bus 38:34–105
Jensen MC (1978) Some anomalous evidence regarding market efficiency, an editorial introduction. J Finan Econ 6:95–101
Wiener N (1923) Differential space. J Math Phys 2:131–174
Gardiner CW (1983) Handbook of stochastic methods. Springer, Berlin
Itô K (1951) On stochastic differential equations. Mem Am Math Soc 4:1–51
Stratonovich RL (1966) A new representation for stochastic integrals and equations. SIAM J Control 4:362–371
Kadanoff LP (2000) Statistical physics: statics, dynamics and renormalization. World Scientific, Singapore
Kelly M (2009) Black-Scholes option model & European option Greeks. The Wolfram demonstrations project, http://www.demonstrations.wolfram.com/EuropeanOptionGreeks, (2009)
Fouque JP, Papanicolau G, Sircar KR (2000) Derivatives in financial markets with stochastic volatility. Cambdrige University Press, Cambridge
Cont R (2001) Empirical properties of asset returns: stylized facts and statistical issues. Quant Financ 1:223–236
Perello J, Sircar R, Masoliver J (2008) Option pricing under stochastic volatility: the exponential Ornstein-Uhlenbeck model. J Stat Mech P06010
Masoliver J, Perello J (2008) The escape problem under stochastic volatility: the Heston model. Phys Rev E 78:056104
Ivancevic V, Ivancevic T (2007) Complex dynamics: advanced system dynamics in complex variables. Springer, Dordrecht
Ivancevic V, Ivancevic T (2008) Quantum leap: from Dirac and Feynman, across the Universe, to human body and mind. World Scientific, Singapore
Voit J (2005) The statistical mechanics of financial markets. Springer, New York
Umezawa H (1993) Advanced field theory: micro macro and thermal concepts. Am Inst Phys, New York
Freeman WJ, Vitiello G (2006) Nonlinear brain dynamics as macroscopic manifestation of underlying many–body field dynamics. Phys Life Rev 3(2):93–118
Trippi RR (1995) Chaos & nonlinear dynamics in the financial markets. Irwin Prof. Pub.
Rothman P (1999) Nonlinear time series analysis of economic and financial data. Springer, New York
Ammann M, Reich C (2001) VaR for nonlinear financial instruments—linear approximation or full Monte-Carlo?. Fin Mark Portf Manag 15(3)
Ivancevic V, Ivancevic T (2007) High-dimensional chaotic and attractor systems. Springer, Dordrecht
Tse WM (1996) Policy implications in an adaptive financial economy. J Eco Dyn Con 20(8):1339–1366
Ingber L (2000) High-resolution path-integral development of financial options. Physica A 283:529–558
Ivancevic V, Ivancevic T (2006) Geometrical dynamics of complex systems. Springer, Dordrecht
Ivancevic V, Ivancevic T (2008) Complex nonlinearity: chaos, phase transitions, topology change and path integrals. Springer, New York
Ivancevic V, Ivancevic T (2009) Quantum neural computation. Springer, New York
Lo AW (2004) The adaptive markets hypothesis: market efficiency from an evolutionary perspective. J Portf Manag 30:15–29
Lo AW (2005) Reconciling efficient markets with behavioral finance: the adaptive markets hypothesis. J Inves Consult 7:21–44
Ivancevic V, Aidman E (2007) Life-space foam: a medium for motivational and cognitive dynamics. Physica A 382:616–630
Ivancevic V, Ivancevic T (2008) Nonlinear quantum neuro-psycho-dynamics with topological phase transitions. Neuro Quantology 4:349–368
Ivancevic V, Aidman E, Yen L (2009) Extending Feynmans formalisms for modelling human joint action coordination. Int J Biomath 2(1):1–7
Frost AJ, Prechter RR, Jr. (1978) Elliott wave principle: key to market behavior. Wiley, New York, 10th edn. Elliott Wave International, (2009)
Steven P (2003) Applying Elliott wave theory profitably. Wiley, New York
Mandelbrot B (1999) A multifractal walk down Wall Street. Sci. Am. February
Ivancevic V, Reid D (2009) Entropic geometry of crowd dynamics. In nonlinear dynamics, Intech, Vienna, (in press)
Ivancevic V, Reid D, Aidman E (2010) Crowd behavior dynamics: entropic path-integral model. Nonlin Dyn 59(1):351
Ivancevic V, Reid D (2009) Dynamics of confined crowds modelled using entropic stochastic resonance and quantum neural networks. Int J Intel Defence Sup Sys (in press)
Kleinert H (2002) Path integrals in quantum mechanics, statistics, polymer physics, and financial markets, 3rd edn. World Scientific, Singapore
Liu S, Fu Z, Liu S, Zhao Q (2001) Jacobi elliptic function expansion method and periodic wave solutions of nonlinear wave equations. Phys Let A 289:69–74
Liu G-T, Fan T-Y (2005) New applications of developed Jacobi elliptic function expansion methods. Phys Let A 345:161–166
Abramowitz M, Stegun IA (eds) (1972) Jacobian elliptic functions and theta functions. Chapter 16 in Handbook of mathematical functions with formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables, 9th edn. Dover, New York, pp 567–581
Griffiths DJ (2005) Introduction to quantum mechanics, 2nd edn. Pearson Educ. Int., UK
Thaller B (2000) Visual quantum mechanics. Springer, New York
Ivancevic V (2009) Adaptive wave models for option pricing evolution: nonlinear and quantum Schrodinger approaches. CEJP (submitted); arXiv:1001.0615v1 [q-fin.PR]
Ivancevic V, Ivancevic T (2007) Neuro-fuzzy associative machinery for comprehensive brain and cognition modelling. Springer, Berlin
Ivancevic V, Ivancevic T (2007) Computational mind: a complex dynamics perspective. Springer, Berlin
Behera L, Kar I (2005) Quantum stochastic filtering. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference of SMC 3:2161–2167
Behera L, Kar I, Elitzur AC (2005) Recurrent quantum neural network model to describe eye tracking of moving target. Found Phys Let 18(4):357–370
Behera L, Kar I, Elitzur AC (2006) Recurrent quantum neural network and its applications, Chapter 9. In:Tuszynski JA (ed.) The emerging physics of consciousness. Springer, Berlin
Black F (1976) Studies of stock price volatility changes. In: Proc. 1976 Meet. Ame. Stat. Assoc. Bus. Econ. Stat. 177–181
Roman HE, Porto M, Dose C (2008) Skewness, long-time memory, and non-stationarity: application to leverage effect in financial time series. EPL 84, 28001, (5pp)
Kosko B (1988) Bidirectional associative memory. IEEE Trans Sys Man Cyb 18:49–60
Kosko B (1992) Neural networks, fuzzy systems, a dynamical systems approach to machine intelligence. Prentice–Hall, New York
Hanm S-H, Koh IG (1999) Stability of neural networks and solitons of field theory. Phys Rev E 60:7608–7611
Manakov SV (1973) On the theory of two-dimensional stationary self-focusing of electromagnetic waves. Zh Eksp Teor Fiz 65:505–516 (in Russian); (1974) (transleted into English) Sov Phys JETP 38:248–253
Haelterman M, Sheppard AP (1994) Bifurcation phenomena and multiple soliton bound states in isotropic Kerr media. Phys Rev E 49:3376–3381
Yang J (1997) Classification of the solitary wave in coupled nonlinear Schrödinger equations. Physica D 108:92–112
Benney DJ, Newell AC (1967) The propagation of nonlinear wave envelops. J Math Phys 46:133–139
Zakharov VE, Manakov SV, Novikov SP, Pitaevskii LP (1980) Soliton theory: inverse scattering method. Nauka, Moscow
Hasegawa A, Kodama Y (1995) Solitons in optical communications. Clarendon, Oxford
Radhakrishnan R, Lakshmanan M, Hietarinta J (1997) Inelastic collision and switching of coupled bright solitons in optical fibers. Phys Rev E 56:2213
Agrawal G (2001) Nonlinear fiber optics, 3rd edn. Academic Press, San Diego
Yang J (2001) Interactions of vector solitons. Phys Rev E 64:026607
Elgin J, Enolski V, Its A (2007) Effective integration of the nonlinear vector Schrödinger equation. Physica D 225(22):127–152
Kaup DJ, Malomed BA (1993) Soliton trapping and daughter waves in the Manakov model. Phys Rev A 48:599–604
Radhakrishnan R, Lakshmanan M (1995) Bright and dark soliton solutions to coupled nonlinear Schrödinger equations. J Phys A 28:2683–2692
Tratnik MV, Sipe JE (1988) Bound solitary waves in a birefringent optical fiber. Phys Rev A 38:2011–2017
Forest MG, Sheu SP, Wright OC (2000) On the construction of orbits homoclinic to plane waves in integrable coupled nonlinear Schrö dinger system. Phys Lett A 266(1):24–33
Forest MG, McLaughlin DW, Muraki DJ, Wright OC (2000) Nonfocusing instabilities in coupled, integrable nonlinear Schrö dinger PDEs. J Nonl Sci 10:291–331
Wright OC, Forest MG (2000) On the Bäcklund-gauge transformation and homoclinic orbits of a coupled nonlinear Schrö dinger system. Physica D Nonl Phenom 141(1–2):104–116
Champneys A, Yang J (2002) A scalar nonlocal bifurcation of solitary waves for coupled nonlinear Schrödinger systems. Nonlinearity 15(6):2165–2192
Landau LD, Lifshitz EM (1977) Quantum mechanics: non-relativistic theory, 3rd edn. Pergamon Press, Oxford
Pretorius F, Choptuik MW (2006) Adaptive mesh refinement for coupled elliptic-hyperbolic systems. J Comp Phys 218(1):246–274
Mallet Y, Coomans D, Kautsky J, de Vel O (1997) Classification using adaptive wavelets for feature extraction. IEEE Trans Patt Anal Mach Intel 19(10):1058–1066
Lax P (1968) Integrals of nonlinear equations of evolution and solitary waves. Comm Pure Applied Math 21:467–490
Lazarides N, Tsironis GP (2005) Coupled nonlinear Schroedinger field equations for electromagnetic wave propagation in nonlinear left-handed materials. Phys Rev E 71:036614
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix: Manakov System
Appendix: Manakov System
Manakov’s own method was based on the Lax pair representation.Footnote 7
Alternatively, for normalized value of the market-heat potential, β = r = 1, Manakov system allows solutions of the form:
where φ, ϕ are real-valued functions and w σ, w ψ are positive wave parameters for volatility and option-price. Substituting (26) into the Manakov equations we get the ODE-system [68]
For w σ = w ψ = w, Eqs. 27 and 28 have a one-parameter family of symmetric single-humped soliton solutions (see the left part of Fig. 14) given by
as well as periodic solutions:
where \(A=\sqrt{w^{2}+B^{2}}\) (with B an arbitrary parameter). For 0 < w < 1 there is also another, in general asymmetric, one-parameter family of solutions for each fixed w [68]
in which φ is symmetric and ϕ antisymmetric.
On the other hand, for negative values of the potential β, the Manakov equations accept dark soliton solutions of the form [87]
which are localized dips on a finite-amplitude background wave (see the middle part of Fig. 14). In this very interesting case, volatility and option-price fields are coupled together, forming a dark compound soliton. Note that their respective relative amplitudes are controlled by the corresponding nonlinearities and frequency. For β = −1 the Manakov equations alow also solutions of the form:
Introducing (33) into the Manakov equations, we get the ODE-system:
which, for w σ = w ψ = w, allow for kink-shaped localized soliton solutions (see the right part of Fig. 14) given by [87]
as well as periodic solutions (30). Inserting (14) back into (33) gives the double-kink solution for the Manakov system:
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ivancevic, V.G. Adaptive-Wave Alternative for the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model. Cogn Comput 2, 17–30 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-009-9031-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-009-9031-x