Introduction

Pelargonium graveolens, belonging to the Geraniaceae family, is a high value medicinal plant (Sharopov et al. 2014), which is planted for its valuable oil that is used in cosmetic and food industries (Pandey and Patra 2015). In adittion, this plant has a very high antioxidant activity against diseases such as cancer, heart disease and diabetes. Also, the leaf of this plant is used as a kind of herbal tea to solve mental problems such as stress and anxiety (Saraswathi et al. 2011; Fayed 2009). Compared to the total rays of the sun reaching the ground, UV-B rays, with a wavelength of 290–315 nm includes a small part (Neugart and Schreiner 2018). Ozone (O3) is the important component absorbing UV-B radiation in atmosphere. Enhanced use of environmental pollutants such as chlorofluorocarbon gas (CFCs) have destroyed ozone layer. Therefore, more UV-B radiation reaches the surface of the earth (Inostroza-Blancheteau et al. 2016). Studies show that this ray can cause harmful effects on the plant. These changes include changes in genomics, lipid destruction, oxidative damage, changes in plant biochemistry and reduced growth (Neugart and Schreiner 2018). In addition to numerous UV-B damages on plants, sometimes, this radiation can induce the plants to synthesize some compounds that are useful to humans (Jansen et al. 2008). Plants have a many strategies to cope with UV-B stress that allow them to offset the negative effects of this radiation. As an avoidance strategy, when plants are exposed to UV-B radiation, the production of secondary metabolites is one of the best known solutions to protect the plant against UV-B. For example the activity of phenylpropanoids pathway including phenols, flavonoids and anthocyanin increases in response to UV-B rays. Many of the enzymes in phenylpropanoid pathway are activated by UV-B. One of them is Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL), the important and a key enzyme in this pathway (Matsuura et al. 2013; Escobar et al. 2017). These compounds accumulate in the epidermal cell vacuoles and prevent the penetration of UV-B rays into sensitive leaf areas, such as photosynthetic tissues (Zlatev et al. 2012). Also, because of redox properties, these compounds might function as single oxygen scavengers (antioxidants) and can effectively prevent the macromolecular oxidation, such as lipids, proteins and nucleic acids, to reduce plant damage (Karaman et al. 2010; Tawaha et al. 2007; Zheng and Wang 2001).

Antioxidants are divided into chemical and natural antioxidants. Natural antioxidants are made in plants. Phenols and terpenoids are an example of natural antioxidants. Flavonoids are probably the largest group of low molecular weight polyphenolic secondary metabolites that are widespread throughout the plant kingdom and an important group of natural antioxidants. They include several sub classes, such as flavonols, flavones, and so on (Matsuura et al. 2013; Gupta et al. 2014). UV-B induces accumulation of flavonols (especially quercetin and kaempferol) in plants. Flavonols are not as efficient as other secondary metabolites in absorbing UV-B radiation, but show the greatest ability to control stress-induced changes in cellular reactive oxygen species homeostasis, and to manage the development of separate organs and the whole plant (Pollastri and tattini 2011). Today, the use of herbal extracts or metabolites extracted from plants as antioxidants is widely used in the medical, pharmaceutical and food industries, and, sometimes, the amount of these compounds increases in the presence of stress factors such as UV-B radiation, drought, salinity, and so forth (Matsuura et al. 2013; Joo et al. 2010).

At the molecular level, UV-B radiation damages lipids, proteins and nucleic acid.

DNA under UV-B radiation produces multiple DNA photoproducts which may change DNA sequence and cause some mutations during replication. The most widespread DNA damages are the dimerization which produces cyclobutane-type pyrimidine dimers (CPDs) and the pyrimidine (6, 4) pyrimidon. In addition, deletion, insertion of base pairs, DNA protein cross link and DNA strand breaks may be generated under UV-B radiation. These DNA alterations can induce phenotype changes, but sometimes these changes are silent mutations (Cuadra et al. 2004). Due to this, molecular biology has provided a useful tool for analysis of DNA changes in living organisms in recent years. Molecular markers such as ISSRs, which are PCR based markers, are designed based on target microsatellite sites for genetic and molecular studies (Shiran et al. 2007; Irshad et al. 2014; Chaves et al. 2009).

In previous work (Azarafshan et al. 2019), we analyzed the effect of UV-B radiation on the essential oils composition and antioxidant enzymes activity. In order to find out more about the effect of UV-B exposure on P. graveolens, this study was set up to investigate the effect of UV-B radiation on the alteration in Pelargonium’s DNA, PAL activity, total phenols, flavonoids and anthocyanin contents as well as antioxidant properties. In addition, Rutin, Quercetin, Myricetin, and Kaempferol as some important flavonoid components in this plant were analyzed with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).

Materials and methods

The aromatic geranium plant was prepared from a greenhouse belonging to the Botanical Garden of Iran. More than 60 planting cuttings (without leaves) were prepared from the mother plant and each were planted in plastic pots (12 × 10 cm) containing sand and kept in a greenhouse under the following conditions, 16 h of light and 8 h (day/night) at 23 ± 2 °C and relative humidity of 56%. The PAR for these cuttings was 194 μmol/m2 s, which was generated by two 40 W lamps (Pars khazar, Iran). The cuttings were rooted after about 4 weeks and transferred to pots containing mix sterilized loam soil and kept in a greenhouse till they produced 5 leaves, then they were treated with UV-B radiation.

UV-B treatment

The experiment was conducted in a completely randomized design. Each treatment was performed with 15 replicates (pots) and one cutting plant was planted in each pot.

In each replicate, five-leaf cuttings were treated. The cuttings received UV-B irradiation under control: T0: 0.00, T1: 0.12, T2: 0.26, and T3: 0.38 W/m2. Treatments were applied to cuttings for 7 days and daily for 10 min. UV-B radiation source was artificially supplied with the Sankyo Denki lamps (G15T8E/Japan) located 70 cm above the cutting plants.

After 2 weeks of UV treatments, fresh leaves of cuttings were harvested for biochemical and genetically analysis.

Sample preparation

The dried leaves (0.1 g) samples (for flavonoids and DPPH assay) and 0.1 g of fresh leaves samples (for total phenols) hydrolysed with 5 ml of methanol 80%, and shaken for 24 h. The resulted solutions were then centrifuged at 13,500×g for 15 min, and the supernatants were used for the determination of total phenols, flavonoids and antioxidant activity.

Total phenols assay

The total phenols in the sample extracts were analyzed spectrophotometrically using a modification of folin-ciocalteu colorimetric by the method of Marinova et al. (2005). Gallic acid was used as standard.

Total flavonoids content

The total flavonoids content was measured by the aluminum chloride colorimetric assay by Chang et al. (2002) method. Quercetin was used as a standard.

Antioxidant activity

The DPPH assay was determined according to Akowuah et al. (2005) method. 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH, 0.004%) was prepared freshly before analysis and ascorbic acid was used as positive control. Five volumes (50–250 μl) of the test extract were added to 1 ml of DPPH and incubated for 30 min. The absorbance was read at 517 nm and the inhibition percentage was calculated with I % = ((Ab − As)/Ab) × 100) where Ab is the absorbance of negative control reaction and As is the absorbance of samples. Percentage of inhibition after 30 min was plotted against concentration, and the equation for the line was used to obtain the IC50 (half maximal inhibitory concentration) value.

Anthocyanin assay

The 0.1 g of fresh leaves of each sample was homogenized with 10 ml methanol-HCl (99:1) according to Nogues and Baker (2000) method. The absorbance was scanned spectrophotometrically (530 nm) to calculate the content of anthocyanin.

Determination of PAL activity

Approximately 0.5 g of the fresh leaves of each sample was homogenized with 5 ml tris-glycine buffer. The extract was used to determine the PAL activity by Wang et al. (2006) method. Cinnamic acid was used as a standard.

HPLC analysis

0.5 g of dried leaves were hydrolysed with 5 ml of methanol 80%, and shaken for 24 h, then centrifuged at 13,500×g for 15 min, and the supernatants were made up to 5 ml by methanol 80%. The extracts were filtered via 0.45 μm nylon filters and stored at 4 °C for further analysis.

Quercetin, Kaempferol, Myricetin, and Rutin standards were provided by Sigma (USA), and prepared in 80% methanol. For each individual compounds, the calibration curves were drawn using different concentrations of standards.

The analysis of Quercetin, Kaempferol, Myricetin, and Rutin was done using Agilent 1260 infinity ii HPLC system (Agilent, USA), covering Binary Pump, Vial sampler with integrated column compartment, 6.0 µl heater and sample cooler, Diode Array Detector WR with a standard 10-mm flow cell, 1100 Autosampler, 1100 Thermostatted Column Compartment, 1100 Diode Array Detector with a standard 10-mm flow cell, and Agilent OpenLAB CDS Version 2.1. The separation of compounds was carried out using Agilent ZORBAX Eclipse Plus C18, 4.6 × 150 mm, 5 µm. The used mobile phase was methanol: 200, acetonitrile: 100, acetic acid: 10, phosphoric acid: 10, and 200 ml of water. The injection volume was 20 μl by a flow rate of 0.6 ml/min. The integrated peak areas of the sample against the standard curves were used for quantification of compounds, in terms of mg/ml.

Molecular analyses

DNA extraction

Five leaves as a pooled sample was used for each treatment. The genomic DNA was extracted from each sample by CTAB-based method according to Doyle and Doyle (1990). The quality of extracted DNA was examined by its separation on 0.8% (w/v) agaros gel. In addition, DNA concentration was measured by NanoDrop. The A260/A280 ratio was greater than 1.8.

ISSR-amplification

Ten ISSR primers; UCB810, UCB811, UCB834, (GA)9 A, (GA)9 T, (GA)9 C, (AGC)5 GC, (AGC)5 GG, (AGC)5 GT and (AGC)5 GA, commercialized by UBC (the university of British Colombia) were used. ISSR-amplifications were performed in Bio-Rad (T-100, USA) thermal cycler. PCRs were run in 25 µl volumes with following program: 5 min initial denaturation step 94 °C, 40 cycles of 1 min at 94 °C, 1 min at 55 °C and 1:30 min at 72 °C. The reaction was completed by final extension step of 10 min at 72 °C. The amplification products were visualized by electrophoresis on 2% (w/v) agaros gel.

Statistical analysis

Genetic analysis

The fragment size was estimated by using 100 bp molecular size ladder (fermentase, Germany). ISSR bands obtained were treated as binary characters and coded accordingly (present: 1, absence: 0).

Parameter like Nei’s gene diversity (He), Shannon information index (I), number of effective alleles (Ne), and percentage of polymorphism (P%) were determined (Weising et al. 2005; Freeland et al. 2011). Neis genetic distance was determined among the studied groups and used for clustering (Freeland et al. 2011; Huson and Bryant 2006). For grouping of the treated plants, Neighbor joining (NJ) clustering was performed after 1000 bootstraping (Huson and Bryant 2006; Freeland et al. 2011). Molecular variance (AMOVA) test (with 1000 per mutations) and PCoA analyzed with the use of GenAlex 6.4 (Peakall and Smouse 2006). Gene Alex ver. 6.4 (2012) and DARwin ver. 5 (2012) programs were used for these analysis.

Biochemical analysis

One Way ANOVA and Duncan test at P ≤ 0/05 level of significance, were used to compare the mean differences among samples by using SPSS Ver. 16. All experiments were conducted by three replications and data were expressed as the mean ± SE.

Results

Total phenols, flavonoids, anthocyanin and PAL activity

Leaves of plant treated with different intensities of UV-B showed a significant increase in the mean of phenols and PAL activity (P ≤ 0.05) at the highest intensity of UV-B radiation.

The highest total phenols content (93.99 mg/gfw) was observed in 0.38 W/m2 treatment and the lowest (73.45 mg/gfw) in the control plants (Fig. 1a).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Phenol (a), flavonoid (b), anthocyanin (c) and PAL activity (d) under different UV-B radiation (control: 0, T1: 0.12 W/m2, T2: 0.26 W/m2 and T3: 0.38 W/m2). Bars are standard errors (Mean ± SE). Different letters indicate significant differences between treatments (P ≤ 0.05)

The highest amount of flavonoid (9.50 mg/gdw) was achieved in 0.38 W/m2 treatment and the lowest (5.97 mg/gdw) in the control plants (Fig. 1b).

The highest anthocyanin content (3.58 mg/gfw) was observed in 0.38 W/m2 treatment and the lowest (2.59 mg/gfw) in control plants (Fig. 1c).

The PAL activity significantly increased by increasing the intensity of UV-B radiation. The highest activity (45.28 µM cinammic acid/min gfw) was gained in 0.38 W/m2 treatment and the lowest (18.16 µM cinammic acid/min gfw) in control plants. The pattern of PAL activity was the same as flavonoid content and it had a moderate similarity by phenol and anthocyanin amounts (Fig. 1d).

Flavonol content

Four flavonols (quercetin, myricetin, kaempferol and rutin) in treated plants were observed by HPLC analysis (Fig. 2). Results showed that with increasing intensity of UV-B radiation, all of the above compounds increased significantly (P ≤ 0.05) compared to the control plant (Fig. 3a–e). The minimum of all of them were determined in control plants. High level of myricetin, rutin and kaempferol were observed in 0.26 W/m2 treatment while the highest amount of quercetin was gained in 0.38 W/m2 treatment.

Fig. 2
figure 2

HPLC chromatogram of P. graveolens methanolic extract under different UV-B radiation (control: 0, T1: 0.12 W/m2, T2: 0.26 W/m2 and T3: 0.38 W/m2)

Fig. 3
figure 3

Myricetin (a), Rutin (b), Kaempferol (c), Quercetin (d), Q/K ratio (e) and IC50 (f) under different UV-B radiation (control: 0, T1; 0.12 W/m2, T2: 0.26 W/m2 and T3: 0.38 W/m2). Bars are standard errors (Mean ± SE). Different letters indicate significant differences between treatments (P ≤ 0.05)

The ratio of quercetin to kaempferol (Q/K) also showed a significant increase (P ≤ 0.05) in all treatments, whereas the highest Q/K ratio (3.97) was recorded in 0.38 W/m2 treatment (Fig. 3e).

Antioxidant activity

Analysis of data showed that the mean IC50 decreased significantly (P ≤ 0.05) with increasing the intensity of the UV-B treatment. The lowest IC50 (1.27 mgdw/ml), was observed in the 0.38 W/m2 treatment and the highest IC50 (1.76 mgdw/ml) in the control plants. All of the studied plants had an IC50 higher than that of ascorbic acid, indicating that the antioxidant capacity of all the samples was approximately half the antioxidant capacity of ascorbic acid (Fig. 3f).

Genetic analyses

P. graveolens plants which were subjected to different UV-B radiation, showed the highest content of percentage of polymorphism (P%), Shannon index (I), number of effective allele (Ne) and Nei’ genetic diversity (He) (23.87%, 0.192, 1.231 and 0.131 respectively) in the 0.38 W/m2 treatment with the highest radiation intensity (Table 1).

Table 1 Genetic parameters under UV-B radiation

The highest genetic distance (0.301) was obtained between control plants and those exposed to the highest radiation intensity i.e. 0.38 W/m2 treatment, and the lowest genetic distance (0.188) was between 0.12 W/m2 and 0.26 W/m2 treatments (Table 2).

Table 2 Genetic distance (Nei) between treatments (control: 0, T1: 0.12 W/m2, T2: 0.26 W/m2 and T3: 0.38 W/m2)

According to NJ tree, all groups and all individuals were completely separated and located in three clusters, and the plants of control and 0.12 W/m2 treatments were the sub clusters of one (the same) cluster (Fig. 4). The study of plants under greenhouse conditions with PCoA showed that all treatments were almost separated in this environment (Fig. 5). This result is in agreement with the NJ tree result.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Neigbor joining diagram of P. graveolens under UV-B radiation (control: 0, T1: 0.12 W/m2, T2: 0.26 W/m2 and T3: 0.38 W/m2)

Fig. 5
figure 5

PCoA of P. graveolens under UV-B radiation (control: 0, T1: 0.12 W/m2, T2: 0.26 W/m2 and T3: 0.38 W/m2)

Analysis of AMOVA showed 53% variance between-group with significant difference (P ≥ 0.001) and 47% variance within-group studied.

Discussion

In present study, the content of total phenols, flavonoids and anthocyanin increased with increasing UV-B radiation.

Investigation on their secondary metabolites pattern also shows that the plant has produced a greater amount of secondary compounds (total phenols, flavonoids and anthocyanin) to counteract the effects of radiation, especially at high intensities (0.26 and 0.38 W/m2). However, the content of phenols and anthocyanin showed no significant differences between the treatments of low and medium radiation intensities. It seems that flavonoids are the main defenders among the secondary compounds synthesized by the two treatments.

Phenols, as non-enzymatic antioxidants, protect plants against stress. It is also proven that high concentrations of phenols accumulation can give the plant greater resistance to UV-B radiation, indicating a major role for these metabolites (Katerova et al. 2012; Chang et al. 2008). The increase in total phenols content is also reported in the fruit of strawberries and in Chrysanthemum at the four stages of floral development, under the influence of ultraviolet radiation (Erkan et al. 2008; Ma et al. 2016).

Flavonoids are major compounds in plant tissues, whose protective action, that is, the defense against oxidative damage caused by UV-B is proved (Alvero-Bascos and Ungson 2012).

Santos et al. (2004) studied the changes in potato leaves influenced by UV-B radiation and reported that UV-B radiation increased the content of flavonoids. The increased content of flavonoids with increasing UV radiation is also reported for two species of Vigna species (Dwivedi et al. 2015).

UV-B is considered as the inducer of expression of anthocyanin biosynthesis pathway genes. Anthocyanin, located in the epidermis, are a UV receptor and protect the photosynthesis system against oxidative damage caused by ultraviolet radiation (Takshak and Agrawal 2015).

Basahi et al. (2014) studied the effect of ultraviolet radiation on Lactuca sativa and reported that all UV absorption components such as carotenoids, phenols, and anthocyanins increased. The increased content of anthocyanins is also reported in the seedlings of Vigna mungo from the Fabacea family, treated with UV-B (Shaukat et al. 2013).

Results showed that PAL enzyme activity increased with increasing irradiation. Since this enzyme is a key enzyme in the phenylpropanoids synthesis pathway, it seems that with increased activity of this enzyme, the pathway is activated under stress and thus synthesizes more secondary compounds. Moreover, the highest activity was observed at the highest radiation intensity, which corresponds to the pattern of increase of secondary compounds studied.

PAL converts phenylalanine into the cinnamic acid, and by successive reactions, this compound is converted into other compounds such as flavonoids, phenols, lignins, and tannins. Flavonoids and compounds derived from phenylpropanoid, as UV absorbing compounds in the epidermis, protect other plant tissues against the damage of UV radiation (Chang et al. 2008; Piri et al. 2011; Di Ferdinando et al. 2012). Escobar et al. (2017) investigated the levels of UV-B resistance in Vaccinium corymbosum cultivars and synthesis of phenylpropanoid metabolites and stated that the amount of PAL and expression of its related genes were higher in resistant cultivars than that of susceptible cultivars. Ma et al. (2016) studied the effect of increased UV-B radiation on Chrysanthemum and reported that the amount of PAL enzyme in this study increased with increasing UV.

The four flavonols examined showed an increase in this experiment. Although the incremental pattern of these compounds varied, the results showed that all the compounds were increased compared to the control plant. In comparison, the increasing pattern of quercetin is quite similar to the increasing pattern of flavonoids. It seems that under UV-B stress, the plant can reduce synthesis of some compounds in favor of the other one to make more useful compounds and protect the plant from adverse effects.

The increased content of quercetin under UV is reported by Gotz et al. (2010), Agati et al. (2011) and Morales et al. (2010).

As well, the findings reported by Demkura and Ballaré (2012), Neugart et al. (2012) and Mewis et al. (2012) show an increased content of kaempferol under UV.

The usual response to UV light is a marked increase in quercetin content, while the content of Kaempferol will increase slightly or remain unchanged. This indicates that quercetin and ortho-dihydroxyls are better protectors for plants against UV radiation. Also, the ratio of Q/K in plants under sunlight (receiving UV radiation) is more than shaded plants. Quercetin is said to be a better antioxidant to scavenge singlet oxygen as compared with Kaempferol. Therefore, in the making of mono-hydroxylated compounds such as Kaempferol and its derivatives, a change occurs towards dihydroxylated compounds such as quercetin. For this reason, a high Q/K ratio is presented in many reports (Majer et al. 2014; Agati et al. 2011; Kotilainen et al. 2008).

Rutin is a polyphenolic bioflavonoid with a high antioxidant activity (Gupta et al. 2014). Rutin can act directly by entering into the Redox reaction or indirectly by iron chelating (Namazian et al. 2008). The reason for the high antioxidant properties of this plant and its medicinal value may be due to the high content of rutin. There are several findings showing that UV increases rutin production in plants. Suzuki et al. (2005) reported that the amount of rutin increased under UV-B radiation in buckwheat plant. They suggested that the rutin plays a role in enhancing the plant’s defense against UV stress.

According to Mahdavian et al. (2008), the content of rutin in the Capsicum annuum L. was higher in UV-B and UV-C treated plants as compared with control plants.

Tegelberg et al. (2001) studied the long-term effects of UV-B on Betula pendula and stated that the content of quercetin increased. They concluded that the changes in myricetin were unpredictable under UV-B. Also, in another study on the content of myricetin in Betula Pendula leaves affected by ultraviolet radiation, it was found that the content of myricetin decreased (Morales et al. 2010).

Investigation on antioxidant activity of P. graveolens leaves methanolic extract showed that with increasing UV-B radiation, phenols, flavonoids and anthocyanin increased, whereas IC50 decreased. This reason could be due to the high phenolic compounds produced under UV-B stress. These compounds, especially flavonoids, have high antioxidant properties. The pattern of highest antioxidant activity of the cuttings plant at the highest irradiation intensity is completely consistent with the pattern of secondary compounds studied because of their antioxidant nature. Our finding indicated that all of three compounds above can have a role in decrease of IC50. Most natural antioxidants usually work together to create a wide range of antioxidant properties with a strong defense system against free radicals (Inostroza-Blancheteau et al. 2016).

Comparision between antioxidant activity with flavonols patterns showed that the decreasing template of IC50 was similar with increase in quercetin content and Q/K ratio. Li et al. (2017) found that under the stress of UV-C, the content of phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity of several types of tropical fruit increased.

In our study, with increasing intensity of UV-B, the amount of genetic changes increased and genetic stability was lost.

The results show that the highest genetic variation occurred at the highest intensity (0.38 W/m2) of UV-B irradiation. As well, the treatment T1 (0.12 W/m2) is the closest treatment to the control and the difference between T1 (0.12 W/m2) and T2 (0.26 W/m2) is less than other treatments.

Apart from being able to show the extent of damage and changes in DNA under different irradiation intensities, this pattern closely corresponds to the biochemical pattern section studied.

In all the sections studied, the pattern of increase in the content of examined compounds showed that the highest increase was at the highest intensity.

Furthermore, no significant difference was observed between T1 (0.12 W/m2) and T2 (0.26 W/m2) treatments for anthocyanin, antioxidant, phenol, and the ratio of quercetin to kaempferol as one of the most important ratios in UV-B radiation. Also, the highest proximity in terms of the content of compounds with control plants was observed in the low (0.12 W/m2) treatment. It seems that the changes observed at the DNA level can either be due to a change in gene sequence due to UV radiation or to a change in part of the DNA sequence, which may ultimately alter the synthesis of the compounds studied.

UV radiation is one of the most hazardous factors for biomolecules and DNA is an important target for it. Plants produce UV-absorbing compounds for coping by UV radiation as a first line for defense (Rastogi et al. 2010; Gill et al. 2015). It seems that these changes are induced by UV-B radiation as a mechanism of the signal that triggers the expression of genes involved in plant defense against UV-B radiation. Plants under UV stress try to reduce the risk of radiation by increasing secondary metabolites, neutralizing ROS species and monomerize the pyrimidine dimers. These changes are very suitable at the genetic level, especially those involved in the production of secondary metabolites, because they are very useful in coping with the stresses in the plant (Cuadra et al. 2010), but they are incapable to avoid UV-B radiation from DNA in all tissue. So when UV-B radiation reach to DNA, it can prouduces many damages such as: (1) oxidative damage (pyrimidin hydrates) and cross link (both DNA–DNA and DNA protein). (2) produce cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs) and other photoproducts, pyrimidine (6–4) pyrimidine dimers in nuclear, chloroplast and mitochondrial DNA. Plants have variable strategies to cope with DNA damages, if the DNA repair does not work well, the accumulation of DNA damage may alter genetic stability due to the mutations occurring (Rastogi et al. 2010; Gill et al. 2015).

Increased polymorphism and genetic instability with ISSR primer is reported in the study of Gnaphalium luteo-albicans under ultraviolet radiation (Cuadra et al. 2010).

Genetic instability in tobacco plants in response to UV-B radiation is also reported by Ries et al. (2000). Genetic variation had been already proven in plants under ultraviolet radiation, in 19 different lines of Arabidopsis (kravets et al. 2012).

Conclusion

The results of this study showed that UV-B radiation affected P. graveolens and caused the increased content of secondary compounds in this plant. This is also the reason for the increased antioxidant power of the extract of this plant at higher radiation intensities. Therefore, the UV-B radiation in the intensities studied here, especially the highest intensity as an elicitor can increase the medicinal value of P. graveolens.

Moreover, the selection of ISSR marker for genetic studies of this plant was a good choice, and this marker was able to completely identify changes caused by radiation in plants and separate individuals and groups. In addition, in present study results indicated that the genetic stability in P. graveolens decreased under UV-B radiation.