Abstract
Forming Limit Curves (FLCs) were determined experimentally through limiting dome height (LDH) tests in AA1050, AISI 316L and AISI 304L. FLCs were also simulated through FE (finite element) analysis. Simulations involved both constant and varying (with strain and strain path) material properties — namely, strain hardening exponent (n) and normal anisotropy (\(\bar r\)).Varying n values were estimated from limited experimental data (from tensile tests) and the implicit assumption that n scales with in-grain misorientation developments and formation of strain induced martensite. \(\bar r\), on the other hand, could be estimated from crystallographic texture only for AA1050. Simulations with varying \(\bar r\) in AA1050 had shown a clear, though numerically marginal, improvement. On the other hand, varying n could remarkably improve the FLC predictability in 316L and 304L, especially in the biaxial region.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Sheet metal forming finds a wide range of applications in modern technological society. Such applications demand in-depth understanding, both scientific and applied, of sheet metal formability. The latter is often popularly represented as forming limit curves (FLCs) [1–3]. An FLC is generated by deforming material at different strain-paths and then plotting a boundary demarcating necked samples, the implicit assumption being that materials do not fail below FLC and are safe to form, if wrinkling is avoided [1–4].
Experimental measurement of FLCs is both expensive and time consuming. Therefore, it is useful to predict the FLCs. Advanced finite element (FE) packages [5–11] and availability of accurate material models [10–21] has made simulations of even most complex geometries [22, 23] a practical choice for today’s metal forming industries. The quest for better forming predictability is an area of significant technological importance [24–25]. But this is also an area where the science of microstructures finds limited usage. For example, it is normally understood [26–30] that variations in important material properties (of relevance to FE simulations are strain hardening exponent (n) and normal anisotropy (\(\bar r\))) during forming can affect the forming behavior and the forming limits. However, such variations are rarely taken into account in FLC simulations. In the present work the variations in strain hardening exponent and normal anisotropy as a function of strain and strain path are incorporated while simulating the FLC.
Three fcc metals were selected for this study: AA1050, AISI 316L and AISI 304L. It may be noted that the selected metals have a range of material propertiesFootnote 1 and were observed (and are expected) [31–38] to have remarkably different microstructural developments. Some earlier studies [31–32] have already shown improvement in FLC prediction by using materials model which takes into account changes in material properties during deformation. The objective of the present study is to use microstructural developments, in terms of changing material properties (\(\bar r\) & n), as inputs towards FLC simulations.
Experimental details
Material and deformation
In this study fully annealed commercial AA1050, AISI 316L and AISI 304L (chemical compositions are listed in Table 1 and 2) sheets of about 1 mm thickness were used. The mechanical properties of these materials were measured through standard tensile and \(\bar r\) bar tests — ASTM E 8M & ASTM E 517 respectively. The use of an extensometer ascertained reasonable accuracy in strain measurement. 2.5 mm screen printed circular grids were used for estimation of effective strain in deformed samples. Table 3 lists the starting properties which are needed for subsequent FE analysis of the three materials and Barlat’s parameters [39] for FE analysis of AA1050.The sheets were also subjected to limiting dome height (LDH) [25] tests in a 200 ton double-action hydraulic press. To achieve different strains-paths, different sheet geometries [3] were used. After deformation, strain and strain-paths were estimated using the standard [1–4] procedure and the experimental FLCs were obtained.
Three different strains and strain-paths were selected for subsequent microstructural characterization. Strains were classified as low (LS), intermediate (IS) and high (HS), while strain-paths were generalized as biaxial (BS), uniaxial (US) and plane strain (PS) (see Table 4). Table 4 also lists effective strain values (\(\bar \varepsilon \)) calculated for the three materials using the Hill’s 48 yield function [16] and the equation for calculating the effective strain is given in eq. (1). The effective strain estimates offer a common basis for comparison between the different strain-paths.
Where \(\overline r \) is the average plastic anisotropy, ɛ1 and ɛ2 are the major and minor true strain respectively.
Microstructural characterization
X-ray diffraction
Bulk texture measurements were obtained using a Panalytical MRD System for the selected samples (as given in Table 4). Orientation Distribution Functions (ODFs) were measured by the inversion of four incomplete pole figures and using the program MTM-FHM [40]. FHM represents fast harmonic measurements and uses standard series expansion [41]. In the present study, the X-ray ODFs were used for calculating texture estimated \(\bar r\) [40] for AA 1050Footnote 2 and Texture Index (TI) for all the materials. From bulk texture measurements \(\bar r\)values (normal anisotropy values) were estimated using MTM-FHM program and the methodology described elsewhere [42]. Texture index, or \(\int {\left[ {f\left( g \right)} \right]} ^2 dg\), where f(g) is the ODF intensity [43], can be used to represent the relative texturing or anisotropy. From the measured XRD (X-ray diffraction) patterns, the percentage of bcc martensite phase was also estimated for AISI 316L and 304L. Martensite percentage was estimated [44] from X-ray diffraction data using equation
Where α’ and γ are related respectively to the martensite and austenitic phase
-
\(I_{a\prime }^{hkl} \) is the corrected integrated intensity of diffraction line (hkl)
-
Rhkl is the corresponding theoretical line intensity,
$$R^{hkl} = \frac{1}{{V^2 }}\left[ {\left| {FF^ * } \right|{\text{ $ \times $ }}e^{ - 2M} } \right]$$ -
\(\left| {FF^ * } \right|\) the structure factor times its complex conjugate
-
\(e^{ - 2M} \) the Debye - Waller or temperature factor
-
V the unit cell volume of the diffracting phase
Electron back scattered diffraction (EBSD)
EBSD samples were prepared using the standard electropolishing technique [38, 45]. A TSL-EDX OIM (orientation imaging microscopy) or EBSD system on an FEI Quanta 200HV SEM (scanning electron microscope) was used. For each sample, an area of more than 2 mm2 was scanned with step sizes of 0.3 μm or lower. The present study used EBSD scans for two purposes: for estimating the percentage of strain induced martensiteFootnote 3 and in-grain misorientations. For the latter, grain average misorientation (GAM) values were used. Grains were identified from the presence of continuous boundaries of above 1˚ misorientation; GAM values were then estimated as average point-to-point misorientation within a grain.
Finite element analysis
LDH (limiting dome height) tests were simulated using finite element (FE) analysis software PAMSTAMP 2G. Simulations were conducted for different strain-paths using appropriate boundary conditions. For the simulations, different yield criteria were tried out. Barlat’s and Hill’s Yield criterion emerged as the best respectively for aluminum (AA1050) (as shown in Fig. 1a) and austenitic stainless steel (316L & 304L). These were used, in the present study, for both constant and varying material properties (e.g. n and \(\bar r\)). To represent stress-strain relation the Holloman hardening law was used and a friction coefficient of 0.12 (between punch and blank) was assumed. For simulations with varying material properties, n and \(\bar r\) were changed in different strain-paths at an increment of 0.1 effective strain. A localized neck can be perceived by the presence of a critical local thickness gradient. Such a perception is independent of the strain path, rate of forming and material properties. In the M-K type analysis [46], the above concept implies that necking should be predicted when the ratio of the thickness of the notch to that of the bulk drops below a critical magnitude Rcri.
In the present simulations, evolution of thickness ratio (equivalent of f) between neighboring finite elements was monitored and necking was predicted when it drops below Rcri The magnitude of Rcri was earlier established as equal to 0.92 by careful experimentation [47, 48].
Results
FLCs using constant material parameters
As shown in Fig. 1, FLC predictions assuming constant n and \(\bar r\) brought different degrees of success. In AA1050 (Fig 1a) the FLC predictions using Barlat’s 1991[39] and Hill’s 48 [16] yield functions were compared with the experimental plot. The former showed a better comparison with the experimental plot. For 316L and 304L the FLC predictions using Hill’s 48 [16] yield function were compared with the experimental plot and the differences between predicted and experimental plot were significant.
FLCs using varying material parameters
Approximating changes in n variations and its role in FLC predictability
In order to explore whether varying n can contribute to any improvement in FLC predictability, the first step required was to approximate changes in n with strain and strain path. During tensile tests, variations in n could be identified as a function of true or effective strain (Fig. 2). As shown in Fig. 2a, n did not change noticeably in AA1050, while significant variations were noted for 316L and 304L (Fig. 2b & c). As AA 1050 maintained almost constant n during tensile tests, it has been assumed that n values will not change during deformation and will remain constant for all the strain paths during simulation. The change in n for 316L and 304L can be linked to the development of microstructural features during deformation. It is assumed that the development in n will be scaled with two important microstructural features (i) Grain Average Misorienation (GAM) (ii) Strain Induced Martensite Formation (SIMF).
As shown in Fig. 3a and Table 5 , the GAM developments with effective strain in 316L are significant and strain path dependent but the change in 304L is very marginal. However, Fig. 3b and Table 6 shows that the formation of strain induced martensite is too insignificant for 316L. Therefore, in the absence of significant strain induced martensite formation, n will scale with GAM (as given in Table 5.) for 316L. In 304L, on the other hand, it was assumed that n will scale with the percentage strain induced martensite, as the formation of strain induced martensite is significant and strain path dependent. It may be noted that in 304 L sheets, GAM variations did not show any significant trend.
Trends in n were available (Fig. 2b & c) for 316L and 304L, but only for uniaxial strain path and limited range of effective strain. However, for accurate FLD estimation it is necessary to have variation in n for all the strain paths. To extend the range furtherFootnote 4, assumptions were needed. As discussed in the previous section, the development in GAM for 316L (Fig. 3a and Table 5) and strain induced martensite for 304L (Fig. 3b and Table 6) is strain path dependent. The changes in GAM and percentage strain induced martensite were further plotted with experimental n values for uniaxial strain path and extrapolated for the other two strain paths (Fig. 4a & b). From such plots, straight linear relations were estimated. The relations were then extended to estimate n values (at intervals of 0.1 effective strains) for the other strain-paths (as shown in Fig. 5a & b). These were then used to conduct FE simulations with varying n (Fig. 6).
Possible changes in \(\bar r\) and its implications for FLC predictability
Crystallographic texture was affected by strain and strain path — see Fig. 7 and Table 7. From the crystallographic texture, and using the standard fcc slip systems, the \(\bar r\) values were estimated [40–42] in AA1050 — see Table 8. \(\bar r\) vs. effective strain plots at three different strain paths yielded linear fit as shown in Fig. 8. The latter was then incorporated for varying \(\bar r\) estimates (at intervals of 0.1 effective strain) — to be implemented into FLC simulations. The FLC prediction incorporating \(\bar r\) evolution is shown in Fig. 9. It is clear from Fig. 9 that in AA1050, FLC predictability shows a clear, though numerically marginal, improvement — on both tensile and stretching sides.
Figure 6 clearly shows the effectiveness of using varying n towards improvements in FLC predictability. The match was almost perfect in the biaxial side (for both grades), though on the uniaxial side differences did still exist. However, improvements in FLC predictability may also be obtained by incorporating varying \(\bar r\) in 316L and 304L. Austenitic stainless steels can have significant twinning [34] and strain induced martensite formations [35–38] and therefore there is no simple procedure to estimate \(\bar r\) from microstructure and crystallographic texture and this is not in the scope of the present work.
Discussion
The microstructure represents size-shape-orientation of grains, phases and defects [49]. It has significant impact on many different properties, especially those sensitive to microstructure [49]. Sheet metal formability strongly depends on the microstructure [31, 35–36]. Formability also has significant technical and commercial implications. As yet, relating exact microstructural inputs for formability predictions remains at best a ‘qualitative’ subject. The reason for this is the limited ability to translate different aspects of microstructure into quantitative numbers of material properties affecting formability. It is this factor which provided the impetus and motivation for the present study.
The present study used the FE analysis approach and suitable yield criteria (Barlat for AA1050 and Quadratic Hill for 316L & 304L) to predict FLCs. This was attempted using both constant and varying \(\bar r\) and n. A few interesting past studies can be cited [31–32], where varying \(\bar r\) and n (from actual mechanical test data) were used successfully for improved FLC predictions. Past studies [34–36] have also shown a strong correlation between microstructure with strain and strain path. However, what makes the present study interesting is that it could convert tangible aspects of microstructural developments (e.g. developments in in-grain misorientation, strain induced martensite formation and crystallographic texture) into quantitative numbers of microstructure-sensitive properties — namely \(\bar r\) and n. These were then used successfully for better FLC predictability (Figs. 6 and 9 ).
This study is an initial attempt to highlight the possibility of using direct microstructural inputs towards better formability analysis. Unquestionably, such efforts need to be even more quantitative and with fewer ad-hoc assumptions, where complexities of microstructure and of microstructural developments can be effectively related to suitable anisotropic yield criteria and to strain path dependent hardening laws.
Summary
Experimental and simulated (using Finite Element analysis) FLCs (forming limit curve) were generated for AA1050 and AISI 316L & 304L. The simulations were conducted using both constant and varying continuum material properties (namely \(\overline r \) and n).
-
In AA1050, the use of varying \(\bar r\) could improve FLC predictability. (\(\bar r\) estimates were obtained from crystallographic texture). The improvement was clear, though numerically marginal.
-
Variations in n were estimated experimentally from tensile tests. These were then related to in-grain misorientation developments in 316L and to percentage strain induced martensite in 304L. This procedure allowed extending n estimates to different levels of strains and strain paths. Incorporating varying n did cause significant improvement in FLC predictability, especially on the biaxial side of 316L and 304L FLCs.
This study brings out clear possibilities for using direct microstructural inputs towards better FLC predictability.
Notes
Of specific interest, from the point of microstructural developments, are the stacking fault energy values. These are about 175, 60 and 20 J/m2 respectively for AA1050, 316L and 304L.
It needs to be stated, at this stage, that presence of significant twinning and strain induced martensite in 316L and 304L makes any \(\bar r\) estimates from crystallographic texture meaningless in these two materials.
These were confirmed by X-ray diffraction (valid for higher martensite percentages) and VSM (vibrating sample magnetometer) [34].
i.e. to cover other strain paths.
References
Keeler SP (1965) Determination of forming limits in automotive stampings. Sheet Metal Industries 42:683–691
Goodwin GM (1968) Application of strain analysis to sheet metal forming problems in the press shop. Trans SAE 77:380–387
Hecker SS (1975) Simple technique for determining forming limit curves. Sheet Metal Industries 58:671–676
Hosford WF, Duncan JL (1999) Sheet metal forming: A review. Journal of Metals 51:39–44
Lu ZH, Lee D (1987) Prediction of history-dependent forming limits by applying different hardening models. Int J Mech Sci 29:123–137
Nakamachi E (1995) Sheet-forming process characterization by static-explicit anisotropic elastic-plastic finite-element simulation. J Mat Proc Tech 50:116–132
Yoshida T, Kayayama T, Usuda M (1995) Forming-limit analysis of hemispherical-punch stretching using the three-dimensional finite-element method. J Mat Proc Tech 50:226–237
Takuda H, Mori K, Takakura N, Yamaguchi K (2000) Finite element analysis of limit strains in biaxial stretching of sheet metals allowing for ductile fracture. Int J Mech Sci 42:785–798
Tourki Z, Zeghloul A, Ferron G (1996) Sheet metal forming simulations using a new model for orthotropic plasticity. Comp Mater Sci 5:255–262
Uthaisangsuk V, Prahl U, Munstermann S, Bleck W (2008) Experimental and numerical failure criterion for formability prediction in sheet metal forming. Comp Mater Sci 43:43–50
Shena W, Penga LH, Tang CY (2005) An anisotropic damage-based plastic yield criterion and its application to analysis of metal forming process. Int J Mech Sci 47:1897–1922
Wang L, Lee TC (2006) The effect of yield criteria on the forming limit curve prediction and the deep drawing process simulation. Int J Machine Tools & Manuf 46:988–995
Cao J, Yao H, Karallis A, Boyce MC (2000) A predictive tool for delaying wrinkling and tearing failure in sheet. Int. J Plasticity 16:1105–1129
Noori H, Mahmudi R (2007) Prediction of forming limit diagrams in sheet metals using different yield criteria. Metall Mater Trans A 38:2040–2052
Stoughton TB, Zhu X (2004) Review of theoretical models of the strain-based FLD and their relevance to the stress-based FLD. Int J Plasticity 20:1463–1486
Hill R (1948) A theory of yielding and plastic flow of anisotropic metals. Proc Roy Soc London A 193:281–297
Woodthorpe J, Pearce R (1970) The anomalous behavior of aluminum sheet under balanced biaxial tension. Int J Mech Sci 12:341–347
Cazacu O, Barlat F (2003) Application of representation theory to describe yielding of anisotropic aluminum alloys. Int J Engg Sci 41:1367–1385
Karafillis AP, Boyce MC (1993) A general anisotropic yield criterion using bounds and a transformation weighting tensor. J Mechanics and Physics of Solids 41:1859–1886
Barlat F, Brem JC, Yoon JW, Chung K, Dick RE, Lege DJ, Pourboghrat F, Choi SH, Chu E (2003) Plane stress yield function for aluminum alloy sheets. Int J Plasticity 19:1297–1319
Banabic D, Bunge HJ, Pohlandt K, Tekkaya AE (2000) Plastic anisotropy formability test forming limits. Formability of Metallic Materials (Editor: Banabic D) Springer Verlag, Berlin
Tseng AA (1990) Material characterization and finite element simulation for forming miniature metal parts. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 6:251–265
Zhibing Z, Yuqi L, Ting D, Zhigang L (2008) Blank design and formability prediction of complicated progressive die stamping part using a multi-step unfolding method. J Mat Proc Tech 205:425–431
Wagener HW (1997) New developments in sheet metal. forming: sheet materials, tools and machinery. J Mat Proc Tech 72:342–357
Hecker SS (1974) A Cup test for assessing stretchability. Mech Eng Quart 14:30–36
Chu CC (1984) A Three-dimensional model of anisotropic hardening in metals. J Mech Phys Solids 32:197–212
Sing WM, Rao KP (1995) Influence of material properties on sheet metal formability limits. J Mat Proc Tech 48:35–41
Toth LS, Hirsch J, Van Houtte P (1996) On the role of texture development in the forming limits of sheet metals. Int J Mech Sci 38:1117–1126
Kumar DR (2002) Formability analysis of extra-deep drawing steel. J Mat Proc Tech 130–131:31–41
Banabic D, Comsa S, Jurco P, Cosovici G, Paraianu L, Julean D (2004) FLD theoretical model using a new anisotropic yield criterion. J Mat Proc Tech 157–158:23–27
Tourki Z, Bargui H, Sidhom H (2005) The kinetic of induced martensitic formation and its effect on forming limit curves in the AISI 304 stainless steel. J Mat Proc Tech 166:330–336
Abedrabbo N, Pourboghrat F, Carsley J (2007) Forming of AA5182-O and AA5754-O at elevated temperatures using coupled thermo-mechanical finite element models. Int J Plasticity 23:841–875
Sevillano JG, Van-Houtte P, Aernoudt E (1980) Large strain work hardening and textures. Prog Mater Sci 25:69–112
Mishra SK, Narasimhan K, Samajdar I (2007) Deformation twinning in AISI 316L austenitic stainless steel - Role of strain and strain path. Mater Sci Tech 23:1118–1126
Hecker SS, Stout MG, Staudhammer KP, Smith JL (1982) Effects of strain state and strain rate on deformation-induced transformation in 304 stainless steel—1. Magnetic measurements and mechanical behavior. Metall Trans A 13:619–626
Perdahcıoglu ES, Geijselaers JGM, Huetink J (2008) Influence of stress state and strain path on deformation induced martensitic transformations. Mater Sci Engg A 481–482:727–731
Wasnik DN, Gopalkrishnan IK, Yakhami JV, Kain V, Samajdar I (2003) Cold rolled texture and microstructure in types 304 and 316L austenitic stainless steels. Iron and steel Institute of Japan International 43:1581–1589
Wasnik DN, Kain V, Samajdar I, Verlinden B, De PK (2003) Resistance to sensitization and intergranular corrosion through extreme randomization of grain boundaries. Acta Mater 49:4587–4601
Barlat F, Lege DJ, Brem JC (1991) A six-component yield function for anisotropic materials. Int. J. Plast. 7:693–712
Van-Houtte P (1995) MTM-FHM Software Manual. Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium
Bunge HJ (1982) Texture Analysis in Materials Science. Butterworth, London (1982)
Van Houtte P (1987) Calculation of Yield Locus of Textured Polycrystals using the Taylor and the relaxed Taylor Theory. Textures and Microstructures 7:29–72
Yerra SK, Verlinden B, Van-Houtte P (2005) On crystallographic texture of as-drawn doped-W wires. Mater Sci Forum 495–497:913–918
Geroult E (1999) Bainitic transformation in TRIP- Assisted steels and its influence on mechanical properties. Ph. D Thesis. Department MTM, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium
Samajdar I, Doherty RD (1998) Cube recrystallization texture in warm deformed aluminum. Acta Mater 46:3145–3158 Z
Marciniak Z, Kuczynski K (1967) Limit strain in the processes of stretch forming sheet metal. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 9:609
Nandedkar VM, Narasimhan K (1999) Measurement of strain history during the stretching of forming-grade steel sheets. J Mater Proc Tech 89–90:24–29
Kumar S, Date PP, Narasimhan K (1994) A new criterion to predict necking failure under biaxial stretching. J Mater Proc Tech 45:583–588
Verlinden B, Driver J, Samajdar I, Doherty RD (2007) Thermo-Mechanical Processing of Metallic Materials, ISBN-978-0-08-044497-0, Pergamon Materials Series - series. Cahn RW (ed). Elsevier, Amsterdam
Acknowledgement
The authors would like to acknowledge financial support from IFCPAR/CEFIPRA (Indo-French Centre for the Promotion of Advanced Research) & DST (Department of Science & Technology) and the texture and microtexture measurements at the National Facility of Texture & OIM (a DST-IRPHA facility) at IIT Bombay.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mishra, S.K., Desai, S.G., Pant, P. et al. Improved predictability of forming limit curves through microstructural inputs. Int J Mater Form 2, 59–67 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-009-0391-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-009-0391-2