Abstract
Predicting the thermal sensations of building occupants is challenging, but useful for indoor environment conditioning. In this study, a data-driven thermal sensation prediction model was developed using three quality-controlled thermal comfort databases. Different machine-learning algorithms were compared in terms of prediction accuracy and rationality. The model was further improved by adding categorical inputs, and building submodels and general models for different contexts. A comprehensive data-driven thermal sensation prediction model was established. The results indicate that the multilayer perceptron (MLP) algorithm achieves higher prediction accuracy and more rational results than the other four algorithms in this specific case. Labeling AC and NV scenarios, climate zones, and cooling and heating seasons can improve model performance. Establishing submodels for specific scenarios can result in better thermal sensation vote (TSV) predictions than using general models with or without labels. With 11 submodels corresponding to 11 scenarios, and three general models without labels, the final TSV prediction model achieved higher prediction accuracy, with 64.7%–90.7% fewer prediction errors (reducing SSE by 3.2–4.9) than the predicted mean vote (PMV). Possible applications of the new model are discussed. The findings of this study can help in development of simple, accurate, and rational thermal sensation prediction tools.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Abbreviations
- GPR:
-
Gaussian process regression
- KNN:
-
K nearest neighbors
- ML:
-
machine learning
- MLP:
-
multilayer perception
- PI:
-
permutation importance
- RF:
-
random forest
- SVM:
-
support vector machine
- AC:
-
air-conditioned
- Clo:
-
clothing insulation (clo)
- HVAC:
-
heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning
- Met:
-
metabolic rate (met)
- NV:
-
naturally ventilated
- PMV:
-
predicted mean vote
- RH:
-
relative humidity (%)
- TSV:
-
thermal sensation vote
- Ta:
-
indoor air temperature (°C)
- Tout:
-
outdoor air temperature (°C)
- Tr:
-
mean radiant temperature (°C)
- Va:
-
air speed (m/s)
- RMSE:
-
root mean squared error
- MAE:
-
mean absolute error
- R 2 :
-
correlation coefficients (r) squared
- SSE:
-
sum of squares for residuals
References
ASHRAE (2017). ASHRAE Standard 55. Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy. Atlata, GA, USA: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers.
Cheung T, Schiavon S, Parkinson T, et al. (2019). Analysis of the accuracy on PMV-PPD model using the ASHRAE Global Thermal Comfort Database II. Building and Environment, 153: 205–217.
Cosma AC, Simha R (2019). Machine learning method for real-time non-invasive prediction of individual thermal preference in transient conditions. Building and Environment, 148: 372–383.
De Dear R (1998). A global database of thermal comfort field experiments. ASHRAE Transaction, 104: 1141–1152.
De Dear R, Schiller Brager G (2001). The adaptive model of thermal comfort and energy conservation in the built environment. International Journal of Biometeorology, 45: 100–108.
Elnaklah R, Fosas D, Natarajan S (2020). Indoor environment quality and work performance in “green” office buildings in the Middle East. Building Simulation, 13: 1043–1062.
Fanger PO (1970). Thermal Comfort. Copenhagen: Danish Technical Press.
Fanger PO, Toftum J (2002). Extension of the PMV model to non-air-conditioned buildings in warm climates. Energy and Buildings, 34: 533–536.
Földváry Ličina V, Cheung T, Zhang H, et al. (2018). Development of the ASHRAE global thermal comfort database II. Building and Environment, 142: 502–512.
Frontczak M, Schiavon S, Goins J, et al. (2012). Quantitative relationships between occupant satisfaction and satisfaction aspects of indoor environmental quality and building design. Indoor Air, 22: 119–131.
Kim J, Zhou Y, Schiavon S, et al. (2018). Personal comfort models: Predicting individuals’ thermal preference using occupant heating and cooling behavior and machine learning. Building and Environment, 129: 96–106.
Li W, Zhang J, Zhao T, et al. (2019). Experimental study of human thermal sensation estimation model in built environment based on the Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy model. Building Simulation, 12: 365–377.
Lin Y, Yang L, Luo M (2021). Physiological and subjective thermal responses to heat exposure in northern and southern Chinese people. Building Simulation, 14: 1619–1631.
Lu S, Wang W, Lin C, et al. (2019). Data-driven simulation of a thermal comfort-based temperature set-point control with ASHRAE RP884. Building and Environment, 156: 137–146.
Luo M, Wang Z, Brager G, et al. (2018a). Indoor climate experience, migration, and thermal comfort expectation in buildings. Building and Environment, 141: 262–272.
Luo M, Wang Z, Ke K, et al. (2018b). Human metabolic rate and thermal comfort in buildings: The problem and challenge. Building and Environment, 131: 44–52.
Luo M, Xie J, Yan Y, et al. (2020). Comparing machine learning algorithms in predicting thermal sensation using ASHRAE Comfort Database II. Energy and Buildings, 210: 109776.
Nicol JF, Humphreys MA (1973). Thermal comfort as part of a self-regulating system. Building Research and Practice, 1: 174–179.
Nicol F, Humphreys M (2010). Derivation of the adaptive equations for thermal comfort in free-running buildings in European standard EN15251. Building and Environment, 45: 11–17.
O’Brien W, Wagner A, Schweiker M, et al. (2020). Introducing IEA EBC Annex 79: Key challenges and opportunities in the field of occupant-centric building design and operation. Building and Environment, 178: 106738.
Peel MC, Finlayson BL, McMahon TA (2007). Updated world map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 11: 1633–1644.
Schiavon S, Hoyt T, Piccioli A (2014). Web application for thermal comfort visualization and calculation according to ASHRAE Standard 55. Building Simulation, 7: 321–334.
Schweiker M (2016). Comf: An R package for thermal comfort studies. The R Journal, 8: 341.
Tang J, Liu Y, Du H, et al. (2021). The effects of portable cooling systems on thermal comfort and work performance in a hot environment. Building Simulation, 14: 1667–1683.
Tartarini F, Schiavon S (2020). Pythermalcomfort: A Python package for thermal comfort research. SoftwareX, 12: 100578.
Wagner A, Gossauer E, Moosmann C, et al. (2007). Thermal comfort and workplace occupant satisfaction—Results of field studies in German low energy office buildings. Energy and Buildings, 39: 758–769.
Witten IH, Frank E (2000). Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques with Java Implementations. San Francisco, CA, USA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
Wu Z, Li N, Peng J, et al. (2018). Using an ensemble machine learning methodology-Bagging to predict occupants’ thermal comfort in buildings. Energy and Buildings, 173: 117–127.
Wu Y, Liu H, Li B, et al. (2021). Individual thermal comfort prediction using classification tree model based on physiological parameters and thermal history in winter. Building Simulation, 14: 1651–1665.
Xie J, Li H, Li C, et al. (2020). Review on occupant-centric thermal comfort sensing, predicting, and controlling. Energy and Buildings, 226: 110392.
Yao R, Li B, Liu J (2009). A theoretical adaptive model of thermal comfort—Adaptive Predicted Mean Vote (aPMV). Building and Environment, 44: 2089–2096.
Zhang J, Zhou X, Lei S, et al. (2022). Energy and comfort performance of occupant-centric air conditioning strategy in office buildings with personal comfort devices. Building Simulation, 15: 899–911.
Zhou X, Liu Y, Luo M, et al. (2019). Thermal comfort under radiant asymmetries of floor cooling system in 2 h and 8 h exposure durations. Energy and Buildings, 188: 98–110.
Zhou X, Xu L, Zhang J, et al. (2020). Data-driven thermal comfort model via support vector machine algorithms: Insights from ASHRAE RP-884 database. Energy and Buildings, 211: 109795.
Zhu Y, Luo M, Ouyang Q, et al. (2015). Dynamic characteristics and comfort assessment of airflows in indoor environments: A review. Building and Environment, 91: 5–14.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 52178087), the China National Key R&D Program during the 13th Five-year Plan Period (No. 2018YFC0704500), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 22120210537). The authors would like to thank Guangdong Midea Air-Conditioning Equipment Co., Ltd. for their support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhou, X., Xu, L., Zhang, J. et al. Development of data-driven thermal sensation prediction model using quality-controlled databases. Build. Simul. 15, 2111–2125 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-022-0911-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-022-0911-2