Abstract
Human embryonic stem cells can be differentiated in vitro into a wide variety of progeny cells by addition of different morphogens and growth factors. Our aim was to monitor the expression pattern of tight junction (TJ) components and various cellular markers during differentiation of stem cell lines toward the hepatic lineage. Human embryonic stem cell lines (HUES1, HUES9) were differentiated into endoderm-like cells, and further differentiated to hepatocyte-like cells. Gene expressions of Oct3/4, Nanog, alpha-fetoprotein, albumin, cytokeratins (CK-7, CK-8, CK-18, CK-19), ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters (ABCC2, ABCC7, ABCG2), and various TJ components, including claudin-1, claudin-4, claudin-5, claudin-7, and tricellulin, as well as an extracellular matrix component, agrin were monitored during hepatic differentiation by real-time quantitative PCR. The differentiated cells exhibit epithelial morphology and functional assessments similar to that of hepatocytes. The expression level of stem cell marker genes (Oct3/4 and Nanog) significantly and gradually decreased, while liver-associated genes (alpha-fetoprotein, albumin) reached their highest expression at the end of the differentiation. The endoderm-like cells expressed claudin-1, which declined eventually. The expression levels of cholangiocyte markers including claudin-4, CK-7, CK-19, and agrin gradually increased and reached their highest level at the final stage of differentiation. In contrast, these cells did not express notable level of claudin-7, CK-8 and tricellulin. The marker set used for monitoring differentiation revealed both hepatocyte and cholangiocyte characteristics of the differentiated cells at the final stage. This is the first report describing the expression level changes of various TJ components, and underlining their importance in hepatic differentiation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Human embryonic stem cells provide new possibilities for the clinical treatment of a number of diseases such as diabetes mellitus type 1 [1], Parkinson’s disease [2], Huntington’s disease [3], cardiac failure [4], etc. In addition, the ability of pluripotent human embryonic stem cells to differentiate into various cell types enables us to utilize them for studying early human development and provides a cell source for cellular model systems.
Human embryonic stem cell-derived cell lines (HUES) [5] can be differentiated toward the hepatic lineage, allowing us to study hepatic differentiation in culture. In vitro modeling of the molecular mechanisms of hepatic differentiation could help us better understand not only normal development, but the pathogenesis of different types of liver cancers. This in vitro system could also help to develop therapeutic strategies for primary liver tumors. Of note is that extending the number of functional hepatocytes in a diseased liver would have obvious therapeutic potential [6].
Parenchymal cells of the liver, i.e., hepatocytes and bile duct cells (cholangiocytes) play distinct roles in diverse hepatic functions, thus, they differ from each other in several aspects including expression pattern of cytokeratins, ABC transporter proteins, and tight junction (TJ) components [7–9].
Human adult hepatocytes express cytokeratin-8 (CK-8) and CK-18, whereas intrahepatic bile duct cells also express CK-7 and CK-19 [10, 11]. Consequently, the biliary type cytokeratins, such as CK-7, CK-8, CK-18, and CK-19 are highly expressed in cholangiocarcinomas [12, 13].
Hepatic ABC transporters greatly contribute to various functions of liver cells. ABCC2 (MRP2) and ABCG2 proteins, residing in the canalicular (apical) membrane of hepatocytes, are responsible for excretion of endo- and xenobiotics into the bile [14, 15]. In contrast, hepatic ABCC7 (CFTR) regulates the movement of chloride and sodium ions across the membrane of bile duct cells [16]. ABCG2 has also been shown to play protective roles in blocking absorption at the apical membranes of hematopoietic progenitor and other stem cells [17]. High levels of ABCG2 expression were reported not only in hepatocytes, but also in human embryonic stem cell lines (HUES1 and HUES9) [18, 19]. A recent study suggested new roles for ABCG2 in the regulation of cellular differentiation [20].
TJs, the most apically located junctional complexes, are critical for epithelial cell barrier and polarity functions, and are composed of several proteins [21–24]. Claudins, with 27 subtypes in human cells, together with occludin are the main protein components of bicellular TJs [24, 25]. Tricellulin is a more recently identified protein, which is concentrated mainly at the convergence of three adjacent cells, however, also expressed to a lesser degree in bicellular TJs [26].
In the liver, claudin-1 can be detected in both hepatocytes and cholangiocytes [27, 28], however, claudin-4 can be mainly found in cholangiocytes and tumors of cholangiocyte origin [7, 29]. Claudin-5 component is typically expressed in the endothelial cells [22], however, it can be expressed in certain tumors such as in fibrolamellar carcinoma of the liver [27]. In normal liver the hepatocytes were found to be negative for claudin-7 and the normal biliary epithelial cells showed intense basolateral membrane claudin-7 positivity [8, 24, 30].
Cells and tissues are characterized by a highly specific TJ protein composition [31], which might be altered in severeal diseases, especially during carcinogenesis [23, 32]. Agrin mediate cell adhesion and control the activities of numerous growth and motility factors and play a critical role in carcinogenesis and tumor progression [33, 34].
During cancer development, the expression of several TJ components usually decreases [27, 28, 35], however, elevated expression of TJ components have been detected in certain tumors [9, 36–38]. In contrast to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) [7, 39], overexpression of claudin-4 has been observed in cholangiocarcinoma [29], in colon cancer [40], in pancreatic ductal carcinoma [41] and in several other malignancies [37, 42, 43]. Claudin-7 is a prognostic factor for HCC [30]. Survival analysis showed a trend toward a better prognosis among patients with overexpression of claudin-7 in tumor tissues [39]. These data suggest that the overexpression of claudins in certain tumors are useful in diagnostics [29, 36, 40, 41, 44], and may even serve as future therapeutic targets [23, 45].
These data raise the question, whether changes in the expression pattern of TJ components can be detected during hepatic differentiation. Thus, we aimed to characterize the expression pattern of TJ components, mainly claudins, in endoderm-like and hepatocyte-like cells differentiated from HUES cell lines. The differentiated cells were characterized by morphological analysis [46], functional assays, and expression profiles of cytokeratins and ABC transporters characteristic of liver cells.
Materials and Methods
HUES Cell Lines and Their Culturing
The human embryonic stem cell lines, HUES1 and HUES9, having normal karyotype, were gifts from Dr. Douglas Melton (Harvard University), and were maintained according to the recommended culturing protocol. Briefly, cells were cultured on mitomycin-C treated mouse embryonic fibroblast (MEF) feeder cells in complete HUES medium consisting of 15 % knockout serum replacement (Gibco-Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY, USA), 80 % knockout Dulbecco modified Eagle medium (KO-DMEM, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), 1 mM L-glutamine, 0.1 mM beta-mercaptoethanol, 1 % nonessential amino acids and 4 ng/mL human fibroblast growth factor [18]. For passage, cells were dissociated with the use of a collagenase IV solution (200 U/ml) (Gibco-Invitrogen). The cell culture was conducted in a 5 % CO2 air mixture at 37 °C. The medium was changed daily (2 ml/well). Karyotype analysis indicated normal karyotype in all experiments [47].
Hepatic Differentiation of HUES Cells
HUES cells at 80 % confluence in 6-well plates were treated with collagenase IV, transferred to Matrigel-coated (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) six-well plates (3 × 105/cm2), and cultured in MEF-conditioned medium containing 80 % KO-DMEM, 2 mM Gluta MAX, 0.1 mM beta-mercaptoethanol, 4 ng/ml basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) for 3 days, while maintaining undifferentiated status. For coating, prior to seeding, the six-well plates were incubated with Matrigel diluted 1:20 in cold KO-DMEM at 4 °C at least overnight [48]. To produce MEF-conditioned medium, Mitomycin-C treated mouse embryonic fibroblast feeder cells were seeded at 55 000 cells/cm2 density in MEF medium consisting of DMEM containing 4.5 g/L glucose and 10 % fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Gibco-Invitrogen). After at least 4 h, the medium was replaced with HUES medium (mentioned above) (0.5 ml/cm2). Conditioned media was collected daily for 7–10 days.
For endodermal differentiation, cells were cultured in DMEM/F-12 medium (Gibco-Invitrogen) supplemented with 1 % fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Gibco-Invitrogen), 1 % BSA (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), 100 U/ml penicillin and streptomycin (Sigma), 2 nM glutamine, and 50 ng/ml human activin A (R&D Systems) [49] for 5 days.
For hepatic differentiation, HUES1 and HUES9 cells were cultured in DMEM/F-12 medium supplemented with 10 % FBS, 1 % BSA, 100 U/ml penicillin and streptomycin (Sigma), 2 nM glutamine, and 20 ng/ml hepatocyte growth factor (HGF, R&D Systems) [49, 50] without activin A for 7 days.
Throughout the entire 15-day differentiation protocol, the medium was changed every other day, and the cells were collected at well characterized stages of the differentiation process; at day 0 HUES cells, at day 3 undifferentiated cells, at day 8 endoderm-like cells and at day 15 hepatocyte-like cells.
Morphological and Functional Characterization of Differentiated Cells
During the time of culture, morphological changes (shape, granularity) were analyzed by phase contrast microscopy (Olympus CKX41, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).
Glycogen storage was determined by Periodic Acid-Schiff (PAS) assay (Sigma). Cells attached to the dish were washed with PBS three times and fixed with PBS supplemented with 4 % paraformaldehyde (Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Osaka, Japan) at room temperature for 30 min. Cells were then oxidized with 1 % periodic acid (Sigma) for 10 min, washed with distilled water three times, incubated with PAS reagent (Sigma) for 15 min and rinsed with distilled water for 10 min [51, 52]. The PAS staining was examined with an Olympus CKX41 inverted microscope.
The indocyanine green (ICG) (Sigma) uptake test of the differentiated cells [51, 52] was performed as follows. The ICG solution (1 mg/ml in medium) was added to the cell culture dish and incubated at 37 °C for 15 min. After rinsing the dish three times with PBS, the cellular uptake of ICG was examined with an Olympus CKX41 inverted microscope. Following examination, the dish was refilled with DMEM containing 10 % FBS. Loss (release) of cellular ICG stain was examined 6 h later.
Quantitative PCR Analyses
Total RNA was isolated from 5 to 10 × 106 cells using TRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen). RNA transcripts were purified by phenol/chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation [53]. Absorption levels of RNA extracts were obtained using NanoDrop Spectrophotometer ND-1000 (Promega, San Luis Obispo, CA, USA). cDNA samples were prepared from 1 μg total RNA using Promega Reverse Transcription System Kit (Promega). The RT-PCR primers were designed to flank a region that contained at least one intron. The data of applied primer sequences are listed in Table 1. Several housekeeping genes were tested in the current study (GAPDH, cyclophilin, 36b4, 18S ribosomal RNA, beta-2-microglobulin, TATA box binding protein, ABL). ABL (Abelson tyrosine-protein kinase 1) was found to be the best control gene for quantitative RT- PCR in the hepatic differentiation model system.
RT-PCR analysis was performed using SYBR Green technology on a Light Cycler 480 real-time PCR system (Roche Diagnostics, Burgess Hill, West Sussex, UK) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The final 10 μl reaction mixture contained 5 μl LightCycler FastStart DNA Master SYBR Green I (Roche Diagnostics), 1 μl of 2.5 μM forward and reverse primers, 2 μl of water, and 1 μl of template cDNA. Cycling was performed using the following amplification conditions: One cycle at 95 °C for 5 min was followed by 45 cycles at 95 °C for 30 s, 61 °C for 10 s and 72 °C for 10 s with subsequent heating to 95 °C for 20 s, cooling to 45 °C for 10 s and reheating to 95 °C at a rate of 0.11 °C/s. Primer specific amplification was checked by 2 % (w/v) agarose gel electrophoresis as well as melting temperature (Tm) analysis.
The delta-delta cycle threshold (CT) method was used for the gene expression assays. Statistical analysis was performed using STATISTICA 8 software (StatSoft, Tulsa, OK, USA). “Nonparametric method” and “comparing multiple independent samples” was used to assess differences between the well characterized stages of the differentiation. Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA and Median Test ‘p’ values less than 0.05 were considered as statistically significant. Data are representative from three independent experiments.
Immunostaining of Differentiated Cells
For immunofluorescence staining of TJ components, HUES9 cells were seeded onto Imaging dishes (no. 5160, Zellkontakt, Nörten-Hardenberg, Germany), and differentiated as detailed in the section “Hepatic differentiation of HUES cells”. The differentiated cells at the final stage were fixed and permeabilized with ice cold methanol for 15 min, and labeled with primary antibodies against claudin-1 (1:100), claudin-4 (1:100), claudin-5 (1:120), claudin-7 (1:100), and tricellulin (1:50) antibodies for 2 h, following a 1 h blocking with Dulbecco’s modified PBS containing 2 mg/ml BSA, 1 % fish gelatin, 0.1 % Triton X-100, and 5 % goat serum (pH 7.2). AlexaFluor-488-conjugated anti-mouse and anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibodies were used (1:250). The antibodies were obtained from Life Technologies/Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA) with the exception of anti-claudin-1 antibody, which was from Cell Marque (Rocklin, CA, USA). The cell nuclei were stained with 1 μM DAPI in DPBS for 10 min. The blue and green fluorescence of stained samples was studied by an Olympus FV500-IX confocal laser scanning microscope using a PLAPO 60× (1.4) oil immersion objective (Olympus) at 405 and 488 nm excitations, respectively.
Results
Morphological and Functional Characterization of HUES Cell-Derived Hepatocyte-Like Cells
A three-stage hepatic differentiation protocol depicted in Fig. 1a was performed with two human embryonic cell lines, HUES1 and HUES9. To evaluate the progression of differentiation, the cells were characterized at four critical points of differentiation. These phases are the original HUES9 cell line, the embryonic stem cells on Matrigel after 3 days (undifferentiated stage), the cells following a 5-day activin A treatment (endodermal stage), and the hepatocyte-like cells at the end of the differentiation (hepatic stage). First, the morphological parameters of the cells were analyzed by microscopy at the end of each stage (Fig. 1b–e). By the end of differentiation HUES9 cells developed into cells, which exhibited polygonal shape and were enriched in cytoplasmic granules, which morphology is characteristic of human hepatocytes in culture.
Next, glycogen storage of the differentiated cells was assayed by Periodic Acid-Schiff (PAS) staining to confirm this characteristic feature of hepatocyte functions. The hepatocyte-like cells derived from HUES9 cells generated and accumulated substantial amount of glycogen (Fig. 2b). PAS positivity of differentiated cells was paralleled with the hepatocyte-like morphology. No glycogen accumulation was observed in adjacent cell populations showing fibroblast-like morphology, or in undifferentiated HUES9 cells (Fig. 2a). As positive control for PAS staining, primary cultures of rat hepatocytes were used (Fig. 2d), whereas MDCK (Madin-Darby canine kidney) cells served as negative control for these experiments (Fig. 2c).
As another assessment of hepatocyte functions, uptake and release of indocyanine green (ICG) dye were measured in hepatocyte-like cells differentiated from HUES9 cells. Differentiated cells accumulated ICG from the medium and subsequently released the absorbed dye (Fig. 2e and f), demonstrating the functionality of hepatic transport processes in the HUES9-derived hepatocyte-like cells. In contrast, no ICG accumulation was observed in undifferentiated HUES9 confirming the specificity of the assay (Fig. 2g and h).
Both morphological and functional assessments demonstrated typical hepatic characteristics of the cells differentiated from HUES9 cells. In contrast, the cells originated from the HUES1 cell line did not exhibit hepatic features, as neither glycogen production nor ICG accumulation was observed in these cells (data not shown).
The Expression Levels of Stage-Specific Differentiation Marker Genes
To monitor the progression of hepatic differentiation of HUES9 cells, the mRNA expression levels of a series of differentiation marker genes were determined by quantitative RT-PCR at the four characteristic stages of differentiation. To make quantitation of PCR more reliable, the expression levels of a numerous housekeeping genes including GAPDH, cyclophilin, 36b4, 18S ribosomal RNA, beta-2-microglobulin, TATA box binding protein, and ABL were determined at each differentiation stage (not shown). Out of the studied housekeeping genes, ABL was found to be the most stable gene during hepatic differentiation, thus, ABL was used as a reference gene in the subsequent experiments.
As demonstrated in Fig. 3a, expression levels of pluripotency markers, such as Oct 3/4 and Nanog rapidly declined during hepatic differentiation of HUES9 cells (50-fold and 40-fold), whereas liver-specific genes, such as alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and albumin (ALB) were remarkably induced (2500-fold and 500-fold, respectively). The mRNA expression levels of cytokeratins, including CK-7, CK-8, CK-18, and CK-19 were also monitored during HUES9 cell differentiation (Fig. 3b), and found that CK-7 expression was significantly increased by the end of the differentiation (120-fold), whereas CK-19 showed only a slight and gradual raise. In contrast, expression of CK-8 and CK-18 was not significantly altered during hepatic differentiation of HUES9 cells (Fig. 3b).
Taken together, the expression pattern of stage-specific differentiation marker genes demonstrate that HUES9 cells can be differentiated into hepatocyte-like cells. It is noteworthy that cells differentiated from HUES1 cells did non exhibit hepatic character in terms of expression of liver-specific markers (data not shown). Given that HUES1-derived differentiated cells lack of hepatic functions and marker genes, in subsequent experiments we focused only on hepatocyte-like cells differentiated form HUES9 cells.
The Gene Expression Levels of Hepatic ABC Transporter Genes
Since numerous ABC transporter proteins play essential role in various hepatic functions, the expression levels of selected ABC transporters, such as ABCG2, ABCC2, and ABCC7 were determined during the course of hepatic differentiation of HUES9 cells. In accordance with previous reports [18–20], we observed substantial mRNA level of ABCG2 in the parental HUES9 cells, which expression rapidly declined, when the cells were seeded onto Matrigel, and further decreased during endodermal induction (Fig. 4). However, hepatic maturation of the cells resulted in significant induction in the ABCG2 expression (20-fold) surpassing the level found in the original HUES9 cell line. The expression of the hepatocyte-specific ABC transporter, ABCC2 significantly increased during hepatic differentiation of HUES9 cells (30-fold). Surprisingly, ABCC7 expression was also significantly induced in the HUES9 cell-derived differentiated bile duct cells (80-fold) (Fig. 4).
The Gene Expression Levels of the Hepatic Tight Junction Genes
Gene expressions of TJ components were also monitored at various stages of differentiation. As demonstrated in Fig. 5, gene expression levels of claudin-1 and claudin-4 were induced significantly (30-fold and 20-fold) during hepatic differentiation of HUES9 cells. In normal liver, claudin-1 is expressed in both hepatocytes and cholangiocytes. In our experiment the endoderm-like cells expressed higher levels of claudin-1, which declined by the end of the differentiation. The gene expression of the cholangiocyte-specific claudin-4 gradually increased and was the highest at the end of the differentiation. Claudin-5 expression only modestly increased during the hepatic differentiation. The gene expression of the biliary epithelial cell-specific claudin-7 showed no significant changes during differentiation (Fig. 5).
The extracellular matrix component, agrin, which mediate cell adhesion, was induced significantly during hepatic differentiation (10-fold) (Fig. 5). However, the gene expression of tricellulin was not changed significantly (Fig. 5). The difference seen in gene expression levels of agrin and tricellulin indicates that the formation of cell junctions is still in an initial phase.
Taken together, the expression pattern of the hepatic tight junction genes suggests the presence of both hepatocyte-like and cholangiocyte-like cells in the culture differentiated from HUES9 cells.
Expression and Subcellular Localization of Tight Junction Proteins
To study the protein expression of TJ components in the HUES9-derived differentiated cells, immunofluorescence staining and confocal imaging were performed with the cell cultures at the final stage (Fig. 6). The presence of claudin-1, -4, -5, -7, and tricellulin proteins in the HUES9-derived hepatic cells was verified by these experiments. Claudin-1, -5, and tricellulin were clearly localized to the cell periphery, whereas claudin-4 and -7 exhibited also some intracellular (mostly submembrane) staining in addition to the predominant membrane localization. In contrast to the other studied TJ components, claudin-1 was not uniformly localized to the plasma membrane, but exhibited patchy distribution at the periphery of the HUES9-derived hepatocyte-like cells.
Discussion
It has been proposed that most epithelial tumors originate from cancer stem cells (CSCs) or tumor initiating cells (TICs) with stem cell-like properties, including self-renewal and multilineage differentiation capacity [42, 54]. Stem cell lines can be differentiated to hepatocyte-like cells implementing an in vitro model for the cancer cell formation from tissue stem cells [55]. During the differentiation process the continuous changes in the expression level of various genes can also be monitored [18, 23, 56–58].
The liver is a good objective for studying tissue stem cell differentiation into tumor tissue cells in vitro [55], since several stem cells lines can differentiate and regenerate into functional liver cells [59] , and effective hepatic differentiation protocols have already been established [49–53, 60]. It has also been demonstrated that the in vitro produced hepatocyte-like cells transplanted into patients can differentiate into functional liver cells [6]. Human embryonic stem cells are pluripotent cells derived from the inner cell mass of blastocyst stage embryos [47, 61]. Pluripotent embryonic stem cells can be differentiated into cells of all three germ layers by adding different morphogens and growth factors [5]. A number of human embryonic stem cell lines are available by now, with well documented characteristics [47, 57]. For the current study, HUES1 and HUES9 as human embryonic stem cell lines were used. There are a number of models, based on which human embryonic stem cell lines are differentiated into hepatic direction [51, 53, 60]. The differentiation protocol applied in our study is straight forward and characterized with well-defined differentiation stages [49, 50].
By way of various methods – morphology studies, PAS staining, ICG uptake and release measurement, as well as mRNA expression profiling of stem cell and hepatocyte marker genes – we demonstrated the capability of HUES9 cells to differentiate to the hepatic lineage. In contrast, the cells differentiated from HUES1 cells did not show hepatic characteristics. Although a pluripotent stem cell by definition is expected to be able to differentiate toward any somatic lineages, the human stem cell lines originated from the inner cell mass of embryos are not in ground state pluripotency [62]. Since the different HUES cell lines are originated from distinct embryos, and their establishment procedures were also diverse, an intrinsic differentiation bias of the various HUES stem cell lines can be observed. The favored differentiation directions of the 17 different HUES stem cell lines have been previously documented in a detailed report [63].
A set of marker genes specifically expressed in the liver allows us to follow the progress of hepatic differentiation [51, 60], whereas the stem cell character can be monitored by pluripotency marker genes [57]. In the current study, the gene expression of Oct3/4 and Nanog significantly decreased during the hepatic differentiation of HUES9 cells, and these genes were not expressed by the end of differentiation, suggesting that HUES9 cells gradually lost their stem cell characteristics during the differentiation process. AFP is a marker of endodermal differentiation and early fetal hepatocytes [51, 60]. ALB is the most abundant protein synthesized by functional hepatocytes [52]. The gene expression patterns of AFP and ALB imply that the cells differentiated from HUES9 stem cells exhibit immature hepatocyte characteristics.
Cytokeratins (CK) constitute the cytoskeleton of intermediate filament type in most epithelial cells [51] and are abundantly expressed in polarized hepatocytes [10, 11, 13, 59]. The gene expression of ductal marker CK-7 was significantly increased in HUES9 cell-derived differentiated cells, and the gene expression of CK-19, which is normally expressed in biliary epithelial cells and hepatoblasts, was gradually increased in the course of our differentiation experiments. RT-PCR analyses of the hepatic marker genes and CKs suggested the presence of immature hepatocytes and cholangiocytes.
With regard to the hepatic ABC transporters, the gene expression of ABCC2 (MRP2), which is normally expressed in the canalicular (apical) membrane of polarized hepatocyte cells [15], was significantly induced in our experiments, indicating that the differentiated cells are almost fully polarized, functional hepatocytes. ABCC7 (CFTR) is expressed in the epithelia by intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile duct cells in the apical domain [16, 64]. ABCC7 significant gene expression pattern suggest the presence of cholangiocytes and immature hepatocytes as it has been demonstrated in our study. The transient decline and significant regain of ABCG2 expression during hepatic differentiation of HUES9 cells is consistent with the literature data reporting high expression of ABCG2 in both stem cells and hepatocytes [18, 20, 58]. In summary, mRNA expression profiles of the studied ABC transporters suggest that the differentiated cells are similar to mature hepatocyte, and possess transient, bipotential characteristics.
TJs play important role in hepatic differentiation, regeneration, and hepatocarcinogenesis [56, 65]. To date the cell contacts and different components of TJs have not been studied during human embryonic stem cell differentiation into hepatic direction. In the current work, we demonstrated the expression of various TJ components including claudin-1,-4, -5, -7 and tricellulin in the HUES-9-derived hepatic cells at both mRNA and protein levels. The changes in their expression levels and that of an extracellular matrix protein, agrin at different stages of the hepatic differentiation were also demonstrated.
Claudins are the main transmembrane proteins of TJs. By separating the sinusoidal (basolateral) and bile canalicular (apical) plasma membrane domains, claudins have an important barrier function and are responsible for the polarization of hepatocytes [24, 25, 27, 64]. These TJ components are associated with both cell polarity and permeability [24, 25, 43]. The combination and mixing ratios of claudin isoforms determine the paracellular permeability in TJs [31, 32]. Claudins have been shown to be differentially regulated in malignant tumors, and to play role in carcinogenesis and progression [23].
Hepatocellular expression of claudin-1 was found to be increased in HCV-infected livers [66, 67]. Attenuated expression of claudin-1 closely correlates with the dedifferentiation and portal invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma [35]. Defect in claudin-1 expression increases paracellular permeability in polarized hepatic cell lines, supporting the hypothesis that paracellular bile leakage through deficient TJs is involved in liver pathology observed in NISCH syndrome [28]. In our experiments, the endoderm-like cells at day 8 expressed significantly higher levels of claudin-1 than the hepatocyte-like cells at the end of the differentiation, which is consistent with previous reports demonstrating that claudin-1 is widely expressed in the epithelia [65] .
Claudin-4 expression reported to be a useful marker for distinguishing between biliary tract cancers and hepatocellular carcinomas [7]. The Clostridium perfringens enterotoxin induces cytolysis very rapidly through the binding to its receptors [68], which were identified as claudin-4 [23]. Clostridium perfringens enterotoxin binds specifically to hepatocytes, and causes pyogenic liver abscess [68]. Claudin-4 can be found in cholangiocyte tumors and cholangiocytes [7, 29], and cytokeratin-7 is a conventional markers of cholangiocytes [11, 12]. In our experiments the gene expression of claudin-4 significantly increased and reached the highest level in the cells at the end of the differentiation.
Claudin-5 expression also gradually increased in our experiments of stem cell differentiation. Claudin-5 is usually expressed in endothelial cells [22], but also present in fibrolamellar carcinoma of the liver, in contrast to ordinary hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma, which lack claudin-5 expression [27, 38]. Our findings that claudin-5 is detected during differentiation from HUES9 is consistent with the observation that certain tumors of epithelial origin deriving from different stages of differentiation express claudin-5 [43]. A significant increase in the expression of claudin-7 was observed in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) versus nontumorous tissues [30]. Survival analysis showed a trend toward a better prognosis among patients with overexpression of claudin-7 in tumor tissues [39]. Unlike claudin-1, and 4 expressions, claudin-5 and 7 expressions did not change significantly during the hepatic differentiation of HUES9 cells.
Tricellulin contributes to the structure and function of tricellular contacts of neighboring cells in many epithelial tissues [26, 69]. We found that the tricellulin mRNA expression was slightly elevated in the endoderm-like cells at day 8 of the hepatic differentiation, and subsequently returned to the basal level. Despite the fact that this increase was not significant, immunofluorescence staining revealed normal tricellulin distribution in the differentiated cells at the final stage. It can be speculated that the small, transient elevation in the tricellulin mRNA level during the hepatic differentiation may result in sufficient protein production.
The heparin sulfate proteoglycan agrin selectively deposits in HCC microvessels versus sinusoidal walls, and also accumulates in cholangiocarcinoma [34, 70]. Agrin immunohistochemistry can be used to discriminate between HCCs and benign parenchymal lesions [70, 71]. The gene expression of agrin, which is associated with basement membranes in several tissues, was significantly increased during hepatic differentiation of HUES9 cells. This further suggests the important role of agrin in hepatic proliferation and hepatocarcinogenesis [71].
The matured hepatocytes are highly polarized cells, where intercellular junctions, including TJs, determine cell polarity [32, 65]. Changes in the marker gene, ABC transporter gene and TJ gene expression patterns in our experiments may reflect the in vivo hepatocyte differentiation process. Expression patterns of the hepatocyte-specific genes, ABC transporter genes and the TJ genes observed in our study were typical for cells having both hepatocyte and cholangiocyte characteristics [13]. This may be caused by complete polarization of cells, which also observed in hepatocytes during development, leading to adequate targeting of proteins specific to the canalicular membrane [13, 14, 21]. Our study indicates that the main cell types in the heterogeneous cell cultures obtained by the end of the hepatic differentiation of HUES9 cells were almost matured hepatocytes and cholangiocytes.
In conclusion, our findings demonstrate that HUES9 cells can be differentiated into typical liver cells with appropriate morphology, functional properties, and characteristic expression pattern. The hepatocyte-like cells differentiated from HUES9 cells can serve not only as cell source to substitute human hepatocytes, but also provide a model that may reveal molecular mechanisms of the pathogenesis of different types of liver cancers, thus, helping to develop novel therapeutic strategies for primary liver tumors.
References
Schulz TC et al (2012) A scalable system for production of functional pancreatic progenitors from human embryonic stem cells. PLoS One 7(5):e37004
Kirkeby A et al (2012) Generation of regionally specified neural progenitors and functional neurons from human embryonic stem cells under defined conditions. Cell Rep 1(6):703–714
Nicoleau C et al (2011) Human pluripotent stem cell therapy for Huntington’s disease: technical, immunological, and safety challenges human pluripotent stem cell therapy for Huntington’s disease: technical, immunological, and safety challenges. Neurotherapeutics 8(4):562–576
Moon SH et al (2011) A system for treating ischemic disease using human embryonic stem cell-derived endothelial cells without direct incorporation. Biomaterials 32(27):6445–6455
Murry CE, Keller G (2008) Differentiation of embryonic stem cells to clinically relevant populations: lessons from embryonic development. Cell 132(4):661–680
Vosough M et al (2011) Cell-based therapeutics for liver disorders. Br Med Bull 100:157–172
Lodi C et al (2006) Claudin-4 differentiates biliary tract cancers from hepatocellular carcinomas. Mod Pathol 19(3):460–469
Nemeth Z et al (2009) Claudin-1, -2, -3, -4, -7, -8, and -10 protein expression in biliary tract cancers. J Histochem Cytochem 57(2):113–121
Kinugasa T et al (2012) Increased claudin-1 protein expression in hepatic metastatic lesions of colorectal cancer. Anticancer Res 32(6):2309–2314
Van Eyken P et al (1988) The development of the intrahepatic bile ducts in man: a keratin-immunohistochemical study. Hepatology 8(6):1586–1595
Paku S et al (2005) Immunohistochemical analysis of cytokeratin 7 expression in resting and proliferating biliary structures of rat liver. Hepatology 42(4):863–870
Vestentoft PS et al (2011) Three-dimensional reconstructions of intrahepatic bile duct tubulogenesis in human liver. BMC Dev Biol 11:56
Dezso K et al (2009) Architectural and immunohistochemical characterization of biliary ductules in normal human liver. Stem Cells Dev 18(10):1417–1422
Mayer R et al (1995) Expression of the MRP gene-encoded conjugate export pump in liver and its selective absence from the canalicular membrane in transport-deficient mutant hepatocytes. J Cell Biol 131(1):137–150
Bodo A et al (2003) Differential modulation of the human liver conjugate transporters MRP2 and MRP3 by bile acids and organic anions. J Biol Chem 278(26):23529–23537
Fitz JG et al (1993) Regulation of membrane chloride currents in rat bile duct epithelial cells. J Clin Invest 91(1):319–328
Guo Y, Lubbert M, Engelhardt M (2003) CD34- hematopoietic stem cells: current concepts and controversies. Stem Cells 21(1):15–20
Apati A et al (2008) High level functional expression of the ABCG2 multidrug transporter in undifferentiated human embryonic stem cells. Biochim Biophys Acta 1778(12):2700–2709
Sarkadi B et al (2010) Evaluation of ABCG2 expression in human embryonic stem cells: crossing the same river twice? Stem Cells 28(1):174–176
Padmanabhan R et al (2012) Regulation and expression of the ATP-binding cassette transporter ABCG2 in human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells 30(10):2175–2187
Furuse M, Sasaki H, Tsukita S (1999) Manner of interaction of heterogeneous claudin species within and between tight junction strands. J Cell Biol 147(4):891–903
Amasheh S et al (2005) Contribution of claudin-5 to barrier properties in tight junctions of epithelial cells. Cell Tissue Res 321(1):89–96
Hewitt KJ, Agarwal R, Morin PJ (2006) The claudin gene family: expression in normal and neoplastic tissues. BMC Cancer 6:186
Mineta K et al (2011) Predicted expansion of the claudin multigene family. FEBS Lett 585(4):606–612
Furuse M et al (1998) Claudin-1 and -2: novel integral membrane proteins localizing at tight junctions with no sequence similarity to occludin. J Cell Biol 141(7):1539–1550
Riazuddin S et al (2006) Tricellulin is a tight-junction protein necessary for hearing. Am J Hum Genet 79(6):1040–1051
Patonai A et al (2011) Claudins and tricellulin in fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma. Virchows Arch 458(6):679–688
Grosse B et al (2012) Claudin-1 involved in neonatal ichthyosis sclerosing cholangitis syndrome regulates hepatic paracellular permeability. Hepatology 55(4):1249–1259
Bunthot S et al (2012) Overexpression of claudin-4 in cholangiocarcinoma tissues and its possible role in tumor metastasis. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 13(Suppl):71–76
Jakab C et al (2010) Claudin-7 protein differentiates canine cholangiocarcinoma from hepatocellular carcinoma. Histol Histopathol 25(7):857–864
Schulzke JD, Fromm M (2009) Tight junctions: molecular structure meets function. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1165:1–6
Forster C (2008) Tight junctions and the modulation of barrier function in disease. Histochem Cell Biol 130(1):55–70
Tatrai P et al (2006) Agrin, a novel basement membrane component in human and rat liver, accumulates in cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Lab Invest 86(11):1149–1160
Batmunkh E et al (2007) Comparison of the expression of agrin, a basement membrane heparan sulfate proteoglycan, in cholangiocarcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma. Hum Pathol 38(10):1508–1515
Higashi Y et al (2007) Loss of claudin-1 expression correlates with malignancy of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Surg Res 139(1):68–76
Sobel G et al (2005) Increased expression of claudins in cervical squamous intraepithelial neoplasia and invasive carcinoma. Hum Pathol 36(2):162–169
Jakab C et al (2010) Expression of claudin-1, -3, -4, -5 and -7 proteins in low grade colorectal carcinoma of canines. Histol Histopathol 25(1):55–62
Miettinen M, Sarlomo-Rikala M, Wang ZF (2011) Claudin-5 as an immunohistochemical marker for angiosarcoma and hemangioendotheliomas. Am J Surg Pathol 35(12):1848–1856
Brokalaki EI et al (2012) Claudin-7 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma. Transplant Proc 44(9):2737–2740
Ersoz S et al (2011) Prognostic importance of Claudin-1 and Claudin-4 expression in colon carcinomas. Pathol Res Pract 207(5):285–289
Tsutsumi K et al (2012) Claudin-4 expression predicts survival in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 19(Suppl 3):S491–S499
Agarwal R, D’Souza T, Morin PJ (2005) Claudin-3 and claudin-4 expression in ovarian epithelial cells enhances invasion and is associated with increased matrix metalloproteinase-2 activity. Cancer Res 65(16):7378–7385
Lappi-Blanco E et al (2013) Divergence of tight and adherens junction factors in alveolar epithelium in pulmonary fibrosis. Hum Pathol 44(5):895–907
Resnick MB et al (2005) Claudin-1 is a strong prognostic indicator in stage II colonic cancer: a tissue microarray study. Mod Pathol 18(4):511–518
Kominsky SL (2006) Claudins: emerging targets for cancer therapy. Expert Rev Mol Med 8(18):1–11
Dezso K et al (2012) Structural analysis of oval-cell-mediated liver regeneration in rats. Hepatology 56(4):1457–1467
Mateizel I et al (2012) Establishment of hESC lines from the inner cell mass of blastocyst-stage embryos and single blastomeres of 4-cell stage embryos. Methods Mol Biol 873:81–112
Xu C et al (2001) Feeder-free growth of undifferentiated human embryonic stem cells. Nat Biotechnol 19(10):971–974
Chen Y et al (2006) Instant hepatic differentiation of human embryonic stem cells using activin A and a deleted variant of HGF. Cell Transplant 15(10):865–871
Cai J et al (2007) Directed differentiation of human embryonic stem cells into functional hepatic cells. Hepatology 45(5):1229–1239
Baharvand H et al (2006) Differentiation of human embryonic stem cells into hepatocytes in 2D and 3D culture systems in vitro. Int J Dev Biol 50(7):645–652
Vosough M et al (2013) Generation of functional hepatocyte-like cells from human pluripotent stem cells in a scalable suspension culture. Stem Cells Dev 22(20):2693–2705
Rambhatla L et al (2003) Generation of hepatocyte-like cells from human embryonic stem cells. Cell Transplant 12(1):1–11
Turksen K (2011) Claudins and cancer stem cells. Stem Cell Rev 7(4):797–798
Sell S, Leffert HL (2008) Liver cancer stem cells. J Clin Oncol 26(17):2800–2805
Halasz J et al (2006) Claudin-1 and claudin-2 differentiate fetal and embryonal components in human hepatoblastoma. Hum Pathol 37(5):555–561
Adewumi O et al (2007) Characterization of human embryonic stem cell lines by the international stem cell initiative. Nat Biotechnol 25(7):803–816
Erdei Z et al (2013) Dynamic ABCG2 expression in human embryonic stem cells provides the basis for stress response. Eur Biophys J 42(2–3):169–179
Papp V et al (2013) Expansion of hepatic stem cell compartment boosts liver regeneration. Stem Cells Dev
Basma H et al (2009) Differentiation and transplantation of human embryonic stem cell-derived hepatocytes. Gastroenterology 136(3):990–999
Thomson JA et al (1998) Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science 282(5391):1145–1147
Silva J, Smith A (2008) Capturing pluripotency. Cell 132(4):532–536
Osafune K et al (2008) Marked differences in differentiation propensity among human embryonic stem cell lines. Nat Biotechnol 26(3):313–315
Turanyi E et al (2010) Immunohistochemical classification of ductular reactions in human liver. Histopathology 57(4):607–614
Tsukita S et al (2008) Tight junction-based epithelial microenvironment and cell proliferation. Oncogene 27(55):6930–6938
Zadori G et al (2011) Examination of claudin-1 expression in patients undergoing liver transplantation owing to hepatitis C virus cirrhosis. Transplant Proc 43(4):1267–1271
Farquhar MJ et al (2012) Hepatitis C virus induces CD81 and claudin-1 endocytosis. J Virol 86(8):4305–4316
Jarmund T, Telle W (1982) Binding of Clostridium perfringens enterotoxin to hepatocytes, small intestinal epithelial cells and Vero cells. Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand B 90(5):377–381
Korompay A et al (2012) Tricellulin expression in normal and neoplastic human pancreas. Histopathology 60(6B):E76–E86
Tatrai P et al (2009) Agrin and CD34 immunohistochemistry for the discrimination of benign versus malignant hepatocellular lesions. Am J Surg Pathol 33(6):874–885
Somoracz A et al (2010) Agrin immunohistochemistry facilitates the determination of primary versus metastatic origin of liver carcinomas. Hum Pathol 41(9):1310–1319
Acknowledgments
This work has been supported by grants from the Hungarian Scientific Research Fund (OTKA K108548), Ministry of National Development (KTIA_OTKA_CK80283 and KTIA_AIK_12-1-2012-0025), and the Momentum Program of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences (LP 2012-025).
We appreciate the gift of HUES1 and HUES9 cell lines provided by Dr. Douglas Melton. We thank Andrea Balogh (Department of Immunology, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary) for the critical reading of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
András Kiss and László Homolya contributed equally to this work.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Erdélyi-Belle, B., Török, G., Apáti, Á. et al. Expression of Tight Junction Components in Hepatocyte-Like Cells Differentiated from Human Embryonic Stem Cells. Pathol. Oncol. Res. 21, 1059–1070 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12253-015-9936-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12253-015-9936-5