Abstract
Fibroblastic and myofibroblastic neoplasms of the head and neck encompass a group of rare tumor types with often overlapping clinicopathologic features that range in biologic potential from benign to overtly malignant. Even neoplasms with no metastatic potential may provide significant therapeutic challenges in this region due to the unique anatomy of the head and neck. This review will cover the following entities, highlighting important clinical aspects of each neoplasm and then focusing on their characteristic histomorphology, immunophenotype, and molecular alterations: nodular and cranial fasciitis, fibrous hamartoma of infancy, nasopharyngeal angiofibroma, nuchal-type and Gardner fibromas, desmoid fibromatosis, dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans and giant cell fibroblastoma, solitary fibrous tumor, inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor, low-grade myofibroblastic sarcoma, infantile fibrosarcoma, low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma, and sclerosing epithelioid fibrosarcoma. While some of these neoplasms characteristically arise in the head and neck, others are rarely described in this anatomic region and may therefore be particularly difficult to recognize. Distinction between these entities, however, is crucial, particularly as the molecular pathogenetic basis for these neoplasms are being rapidly elucidated, in some instances allowing for targeted therapeutic approaches.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
This review provides an overview of fibroblastic and myofibroblastic neoplasms that may arise in the head and neck, beginning with benign entities (some of which have only recently been recognized to be neoplastic), and ending with clinically aggressive fibroblastic sarcomas. While some of these neoplasms occur frequently (even exclusively) in the head and neck, others are rarely reported at these sites and require awareness of the possibility of such tumor types in order to arrive at the correct diagnosis. Several neoplasms discussed herein have recently described or well-known recurrent molecular alterations, while other neoplasms are yet genetically uncharacterized (Table 1). Special attention to recent immunophenotypic and/or molecular findings has been paid throughout this review in order to highlight diagnostically or clinically relevant updates for these neoplasms.
Nodular and Cranial Fasciitis
Nodular fasciitis (NOF) is a benign myofibroblastic neoplasm that presents as a solitary subcutaneous mass on the upper extremities, trunk, or head and neck (up to 25% in some series) [1,2,3,4]. In the head and neck, NOF most commonly arises on the face or neck, but has also been reported in the oral cavity, orbit, parotid and ear [4,5,6]. While the age range at presentation is wide, the peak incidence is in the third and fourth decades [1, 2]. Tumors grow rapidly, typically with a preoperative duration of less than 3 months, may be tender or painless, and often measure less than 3 cm on excision [1,2,3,4]. Spontaneous regression prior to surgical resection is characteristic, with “recurrences” only occurring after incomplete surgical excision [1, 7].
Cranial fasciitis (CF) is a rare variant of NOF that arises on the scalp, most commonly in the temporal and parietal regions, with 80 reported cases since its original description in 1980 [8, 9]. In contrast to NOF, CF typically presents in infants prior to two years of age (with a male predominance), including some congenital tumors [8,9,10]. Lesions often cause a “saucer-like” erosion of the outer table of the skull, occasionally eroding through the inner table as well [8]. Although trauma has often been invoked for the etiology of both CF and NOF, evidence for this association is weak [4, 9].
On gross examination, NOF and CF are rubbery, fibrous or myxoid, focally cystic masses, which can appear circumscribed or somewhat infiltrative [1, 8]. Histologically, both are cellular lesions comprised of plump, spindled-to-stellate cells with bland ovoid nuclei arranged in loose fascicles (Fig. 1) [2, 3, 8]. More cellular lesions appear vaguely storiform or whorled. The stroma may be predominantly myxoid or collagenous, including areas of keloidal collagen (see Fig. 1c); prominent admixed capillaries are reminiscent of granulation tissue [1,2,3]. The cells notably lack nuclear atypia, hyperchromasia, or pleomorphism, but often display a high mitotic rate (10 per 10 HPF or higher) without atypical forms. Extravasated erythrocytes and chronic inflammation are common findings; more rarely, osteoclast-like giant cells may be prominent (see Fig. 1d) [3]. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) is not particularly helpful; smooth muscle actin (SMA) is characteristically diffusely positive, and focal desmin expression is sometimes seen [3].
Though NOF has been widely regarded to be reactive in nature, recent studies have identified recurrent USP6 gene rearrangements in most cases, often with MYH9 as the fusion partner (~ 70%), reclassifying these lesions as benign neoplasms [11,12,13]. USP6 gene rearrangements have also been documented in CF [14]. Given that these tumors are self-limited, the concept of “transient neoplasia” has been proposed [12].
Fibrous Hamartoma of Infancy
Fibrous hamartoma of infancy (FHI) is a rare benign neoplasm that presents as a painless, solitary, subcutaneous mass in the axilla, trunk, or proximal extremities, though up to 10% occur in the head and neck region, including the cheek, scalp, and orbit [15,16,17,18]. FHI typically arises in infants less than 2 years of age (20% of cases are congenital), with a male predominance [17, 18]. FHI recurs locally in 15% of cases, without aggressive behavior or metastases [16,17,18]. Grossly, FHIs are poorly circumscribed, containing variable amounts of adipose and fibrous tissue, and measure between 3 and 5 cm [15].
Histologically, FHI displays a distinctive triphasic organoid architecture: (1) intersecting fascicles of bland spindle cells within a collagenous stroma, (2) mature adipose tissue, and (3) nodules of primitive mesenchyme composed of spindled to stellate cells within a loose basophilic or myxoid stroma (Fig. 2) [15, 19]. The proportions of these components are highly variable; when one predominates, diagnosis can be challenging, especially on biopsy. Around a quarter of cases contain prominent areas of hyalinized collagenous stroma with pseudoangiomatous slit-like spaces, mimicking giant cell fibroblastoma (see Fig. 2b) [17]. IHC reveals SMA expression in fibroblastic fascicles and CD34 in primitive mesenchyme as well as hyalinized collagenous areas [17, 19]. Interestingly, recent studies have revealed recurrent somatic EGFR exon 20 insertion/duplication mutations in FHI, supporting a neoplastic rather than hamartomatous etiology for this lesion [20, 21].
Nasopharyngeal Angiofibroma
Nasopharyngeal angiofibroma (NA) is a rare fibrovascular neoplasm that arises in the posterolateral nasal wall almost exclusively in adolescent males [22,23,24,25]. NA classically presents with the triad of nasal obstruction, recurrent epistaxis, and a nasopharyngeal mass; this tumor may be locally aggressive, causing destruction of the paranasal sinuses, orbit, and skull base with intracranial extension in occasional cases [24, 25]. NA is associated with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) in some cases [26], and these lesions are thought to be hormonally driven given their predilection for adolescent males, although the etiology remains unclear [27]. Imaging is often diagnostic, obviating preoperative biopsy, and recurrence despite surgical resection may occur in up to a quarter of cases [22,23,24,25].
Macroscopically, NAs typically measure around 4 cm and appear polypoid or lobulated [23]. Histologically, they are composed of numerous variably-sized vascular spaces within a fibrous stroma containing plump spindled to stellate stromal cells (see Fig. 2c) [28]. Vascular spaces range from slit-like capillaries to dilated, branching vessels of varying thickness. Stroma may be loose and edematous or densely collagenous, often containing prominent mast cells [28]. By IHC, stromal cells are often positive for androgen receptor (AR) [29, 30] and show strong diffuse nuclear staining for β-catenin (see Fig. 2d) [31]. Studies have shown X chromosome gains, with associated gains in a copy of AR [27], as well as somatic mutations in exon 3 of CTNNB1 (encoding β-catenin) in up to 75% of cases [31, 32].
Nuchal-Type and Gardner Fibromas
Nuchal-type fibroma (NTF) and Gardner fibroma (GAF) are two histologically similar yet distinct benign fibroblastic tumors that arise within different age groups and at different body sites, allowing for distinction in most cases. Unlike GAF, which affects males and females equally, NTF has a strong male predominance (4.5:1) [33,34,35]. Notably, NTF occurs most commonly in the 5th decade of life, while GAF is more common in young children, although age ranges are wide for both tumor types [34, 35]. While 70% of NTF arise in the posterior neck, they may occur at extra-nuchal sites, including the face and upper back [33, 35]. In contrast, only 15% of GAF occur in the head and neck, with the majority arising on the trunk, especially the paraspinal region [34]. The vast majority of GAF are associated with FAP and APC germline mutations, making GAF a sentinel lesion for FAP; all patients diagnosed with GAF should undergo genetic counseling, along with their parents [36, 37]. Up to 50% of patients with NTF have diabetes mellitus [35]. Recurrence following surgical excision of either lesion is not uncommon [33,34,35]. Importantly, desmoid fibromatosis arises at the same site of up to half of surgically excised GAF [34].
Both lesions are poorly circumscribed, subcutaneous to dermal, hypocellular proliferations of nondescript, bland stromal fibroblasts admixed with collagen bundles (Fig. 3). Entrapped adipose tissue or skeletal muscle is seen in both lesions; entrapped nerves are common in NTF often with peripheral traumatic neuroma-like areas [34, 35]. IHC for CD34 is positive in the stromal cells of both lesions, with nuclear β-catenin seen in two-thirds of GAF [34,35,36]. Biallelic APC inactivation has been reported in FAP-associated GAF [37].
Desmoid Fibromatosis
Desmoid fibromatosis (DF) is a locally aggressive fibroblastic neoplasm, which occurs in the head and neck in up to 15% of cases, and in a greater percentage of cases in the pediatric population [38,39,40]. In this region, the neck is most commonly affected; tumors of the face, mandible, paranasal sinuses, larynx, orbit, and oral cavity are also reported [38,39,40,41]. Children and young adults are most commonly affected by head and neck DF, although the age range is wide [39,40,41]. Patients typically present with a painless, rapidly growing, deep-seated mass, though pain and neurological deficits have been reported for DF of this region [39, 41]. As in other locations, DF of the head and neck is associated with prior trauma or surgery, and more rarely with APC germline mutations, highlighting the likely multifactorial pathogenesis of DF [39, 42]. Head and neck DF presents unique therapeutic challenges given the unpredictable tumor behavior and proximity to vital anatomic structures, with rare fatalities reported due to airway or vascular involvement and high morbidity with attempts to achieve negative margins [39, 41]. Though DF is often locally aggressive, with a recurrence rate of up to 30% following surgical excision, stable disease without treatment is common, and spontaneous regression also occurs [39,40,41,42]. Treatment typically involves surgery, but given the complexities of operating at this site, may also include radiotherapy, chemotherapy, tamoxifen, and tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as imatinib and sorafenib; a conservative “watchful waiting” approach has become more common in recent years [39, 41].
Grossly, DF appears white-tan, whorled, and fibrous, with ill-defined borders [42, 43]. Histologically, the lesions are comprised of bland spindled to stellate fibroblasts arranged in long sweeping fascicles within a collagenous stroma, irregularly infiltrating through surrounding adipose tissue or skeletal muscle (see Fig. 3c and d) [42,43,44]. Stroma may contain areas of dense keloidal collagen or loose myxoid change, as well as prominent vasculature with perivascular edema. Tumor cells are uniform, lacking nuclear atypia or hyperchromasia. By IHC, SMA is usually positive, and up to 80% of DF show nuclear staining for β-catenin [42]; importantly, nuclear β-catenin is also observed in superficial fibromatoses and some sarcomas and is therefore not specific, nor entirely sensitive, for DF [45]. Somatic mutations in exon 3 of CTNNB1 are found in up to 90% of sporadic DF, with the S45F mutation predicting a higher risk of local recurrence [46,47,48]; rarely, somatic APC mutations are identified instead [49].
Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans and Giant Cell Fibroblastoma
Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) and giant cell fibroblastoma (GCF) are two cutaneous fibroblastic neoplasms that share clinicopathologic and genetic features. GCF predominantly affects pediatric patients and DFSP arises most often in young to middle-aged adults, although both tumor types can affect newborns to elderly individuals [50,51,52]. Both have a male predilection and present with a slow-growing, painless, often protuberant, multinodular or polypoid cutaneous mass or plaque [50,51,52]. While they both most commonly arise on the trunk and proximal extremities, rare GCF and up to 15% of DFSP occur in the head and neck [50,51,52,53]. GCF and DFSP are associated with local recurrence in up to 50% of cases, especially if incompletely excised. Neither GCF nor conventional DFSP metastasize; however, the fibrosarcomatous variant of DFSP is associated with metastatic potential (up to 15%), typically to the lungs [54, 55]. Excision with wide surgical margins is the treatment of choice, although tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as imatinib may be administered to patients with tumors at sites where surgery would be morbid or disfiguring [52].
Grossly, both DFSP and GCF are ill-defined, infiltrative, predominantly dermal and subcutaneous lesions; DFSP arising on the scalp may invade periosteum or the skull [50, 52]. Histologically, both neoplasms display honeycomb infiltration through subcutaneous fat (Fig. 4), often with sparing of entrapped skin adnexal structures. DFSP is characterized by uniform, cytologically bland, hyperchromatic spindle cells arranged in a monotonous storiform pattern with low mitotic activity [52]. Occasional tumors contain distinctive myoid nodules (see Fig. 4b). GCF is relatively hypocellular, composed of a haphazard arrangement of bland spindle cells embedded in a myxoid to collagenous stroma, containing distinctive angiectoid spaces lined by floret-like giant cells (see Fig. 4d) [50]. Interestingly, hybrid tumors with areas of both DFSP and GCF can be seen; pure GCF may recur as hybrid tumors or as DFSP and vice versa, highlighting the close relationship between these tumor types [51]. Mitotic activity is not prominent in either neoplasm but is often high in the fibrosarcomatous variant of DFSP, which is characterized by a fascicular growth pattern and enlarged, vesicular nuclei with increased nuclear atypia (see Fig. 4c). Approximately 5% of DFSP (and rarely GCF) may display melanin pigment-containing tumor cells, known as Bednar tumors [52]. By IHC, both tumors are characteristically positive for CD34, though, notably, there is loss of CD34 staining in half of fibrosarcomatous DFSP [54]. Genetically, both DFSP and GCF are associated with rearrangements of 17q21 and 22q13, resulting in a COL1A1-PDGFB gene fusion, further supporting the close relationship between these tumor types [56]. DSFP contains this fusion within supernumerary ring chromosomes, whereas GCF usually harbors a balanced t(17;22) translocation [50, 56]. Interestingly, studies in hybrid GCF-DFSP tumors have shown multiple copy gains of COL1A1-PDGFB in DFSP areas compared to GCF areas, as well as progressive copy number gains of the fusion gene in tumors progressing from GCF to hybrid GCF-DFSP to fibrosarcomatous DFSP [57, 58]. Recent studies have identified alternate COL6A3-PDGFD and EMILIN2-PDGFD fusion genes in DFSP [59, 60].
Solitary Fibrous Tumor
Solitary fibrous tumors (SFTs) are fibroblastic neoplasms of intermediate biologic potential with a peak incidence in middle-aged adults and no sex predilection [61, 62]. Although SFTs display a wide anatomic distribution, 10–15% occur in the head and neck, with the sinonasal tract, orbit, oral cavity and salivary glands most frequently involved [62,63,64]. Head and neck SFTs typically present as slow-growing painless masses, with site-related compressive symptoms and at smaller sizes (often 5 cm or less) than at other anatomic locations [62, 64]. Rates of positive surgical resection margins and local recurrences (up to 35%) are higher in SFTs of the head and neck, although rates of distant metastases are lower than at other sites [61,62,63,64]. Recurrences may occur greater than 15 years after primary excision [61]. Recent studies have demonstrated that clinicopathologic features associated with increased risk of metastasis and death from disease include older age, larger tumor size, increased mitotic activity, and presence of tumor necrosis, leading to the creation of a 3-tiered risk stratification model including these factors [61, 65].
Grossly, head and neck SFTs are often circumscribed, solid, white-tan and fibrous, with infiltrative growth and bony invasion occasionally seen [62, 66]. Histologically, SFTs are morphologically heterogenous, characterized by cytologically bland ovoid to spindle cells arranged in a patternless architecture within a hypocellular to densely cellular collagenous stroma, associated with prominent thin-walled, dilated, branching hemangiopericytoma-like (“staghorn”) vessels (see Fig. 5) [66]. Stromal and perivascular hyalinization as well as keloidal-type collagen is common. Less common SFT morphologic variants include myxoid (with prominent myxoid stroma) (see Fig. 5c), epithelioid (with predominantly rounded cells with pale to eosinophilic cytoplasm), lipomatous or fat-forming (with interspersed mature adipocytes, formerly known as “lipomatous hemangiopericytoma”), and giant cell-rich (with scattered multinucleated giant cells, often lining dilated pseudovascular spaces, formerly known as “giant cell angiofibroma”) (see Fig. 5d), all of which are seen in the head and neck [62, 63, 66]. Mitotic activity ranges from absent to brisk, with a greater risk for metastasis associated with mitotic activity equal to or greater than 4 per 10 HPF [61, 65]. Rarely, “dedifferentiation”, or high-grade sarcomatous transformation with overt pleomorphism and necrosis, may be identified, and is associated with poor outcomes [67]. Characteristically, SFTs are diffusely positive for CD34 [66]. Importantly, recent studies have identified recurrent NAB2-STAT6 gene fusions in nearly all SFTs [68,69,70]; subsequent studies revealed that nuclear expression of STAT6 by IHC is highly sensitive and specific for SFT (see Fig. 5a) [71]. More recent studies have revealed TERT promoter mutations in 20–30% of SFTs, which are associated with worse prognosis [72, 73].
Inflammatory Myofibroblastic Tumor
Previously termed “inflammatory pseudotumor” (among many other names), inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT) is a myofibroblastic neoplasm of intermediate biologic potential that arises predominantly in children, adolescents, and young adults in the lungs, abdomen, and pelvis [74, 75]. However, up to 15% of IMTs arise in the head and neck, where they are more common in adults [76,77,78,79]. Laryngeal IMTs present with hoarseness and dysphonia [77, 78], while sinonasal IMTs typically present with nasal obstruction and pain [76]. Systemic symptoms and laboratory abnormalities described in up to 30% of IMTs overall [75] are not typically reported in sinonasal or laryngeal IMTs [76, 77]. Laryngeal IMTs generally arise in the glottis and follow a benign clinical course following excision [77, 78], while sinonasal and oral cavity IMTs are clinically more aggressive, with higher rates of recurrence, metastasis and mortality despite treatment [79, 80]. Other reported sites include pharynx, neck, skull base, salivary glands, trachea, and orbit [74, 79].
Grossly, IMTs appear polypoid or nodular, with fibrous or fleshy, white-tan cut surfaces [75], typically less than 3 cm in the larynx and less than 7 cm elsewhere in the head and neck [78, 79]. Histologically, IMTs display three histologic patterns, sometimes all within the same lesion: a myxoid fasciitis-like pattern, a cellular spindle cell pattern, and a hypocellular fibromatosis-like pattern (Fig. 6) [74, 75]. The myxoid pattern is characterized by plump or stellate cells loosely arranged in a myxoid matrix with prominent vasculature and an associated inflammatory infiltrate of eosinophils, neutrophils and lymphocytes. The cellular spindle cell pattern is composed of uniform elongated spindle cells with vesicular chromatin within a collagenous stroma arranged compactly in a fascicular or storiform architecture, often with numerous admixed plasma cells and lymphocytes. The hypocellular fibrous pattern mimics DF, with relatively sparse elongated spindle cells arranged within fascicles of dense collagenous stroma containing scattered lymphocytes, plasma cells, and eosinophils. Nuclei typically display mild atypia and low mitotic activity, without atypical mitoses or hyperchromasia [81]. Some IMTs display scattered large polygonal “ganglion-like” cells with vesicular nuclei, prominent nucleoli, and abundant amphophilic cytoplasm [75, 81]. IHC for SMA and desmin is at least focally present in the vast majority of IMTs [75]. Recurrent chromosomal rearrangements of 2p23 resulting in ALK gene fusions are documented in approximately 60% of IMTs, with a wide range of fusion partners [82, 83]. Cytoplasmic ALK staining by IHC is observed in up to 60% of IMTs (see Fig. 6c), which correlates with ALK gene rearrangement by FISH [84,85,86]. IMTs lacking ALK expression are associated with older patient age and a more aggressive clinical course [76, 81].
Low-Grade Myofibroblastic Sarcoma
Low-grade myofibroblastic sarcoma is a rare, relatively indolent myofibroblastic neoplasm with low metastatic potential and a predilection for the extremities and head and neck [87, 88]. The oral cavity, especially the tongue, is a preferred site, although cases have been reported in the mandible, paranasal sinuses, larynx, neck, and skull base [88,89,90]. While low-grade myofibroblastic sarcoma can occur in pediatric and elderly patients, the majority arise during the 4th and 5th decades of life, commonly presenting as a painless, slowly enlarging mass or swelling, which may be submucosal, subcutaneous, intramuscular or rarely intraosseous [87,88,89,90]. Following complete wide surgical excision, local recurrence is uncommon and distant metastasis rare, although complete excision of head and neck tumors may be challenging [90, 91].
Grossly, tumors appear white-tan and fibrous, with ill-defined margins, and are often less than 5 cm in size within the head and neck [88, 91]. Histologically, tumors are composed of cellular fascicles (occasionally with a herringbone or storiform architecture) of atypical spindle cells within a collagenous and variably hyalinized stroma (Fig. 7) [87, 92]. The nuclei are tapering and wavy or plump and stellate, with mild to moderate nuclear atypia and low mitotic activity (typically < 6 per 10 HPF) [92]. When intramuscular, low-grade myofibroblastic sarcoma displays diffuse infiltration among individual muscle fibers creating a characteristic “checkerboard” pattern, mimicking proliferative myositis (see Fig. 7a) [87]. Unlike IMT, lymphocytes and plasma cells are not prominent [92]. Low-grade myofibroblastic sarcoma displays a variable immunophenotype with some tumors positive for both desmin and SMA, and others positive for only one or the other [91, 92]. Importantly, up to a third of tumors show nuclear β-catenin by IHC, leading to potential confusion with DF [45]. No recurrent cytogenetic or molecular genetic alterations have been described thus far [90, 93].
Infantile Fibrosarcoma
Infantile fibrosarcoma (IFS), also known as congenital fibrosarcoma, is a rare malignant fibroblastic neoplasm with a male predilection, which arises predominantly in the limbs of infants [94,95,96]. Over a third of IFS are present at birth, with the majority diagnosed prior to 12 months [96,97,98]. Up to 15% of IFS occur in the head and neck, with reported sites including scalp, tongue, parotid, and orbit [94,95,96,97]. IFS typically presents as a rapidly enlarging painless mass with erythematous, often ulcerated, overlying skin, mimicking a vascular tumor [94, 95]. Local recurrence following surgical excision is common (25–40%), with metastases and mortality at around 10% [98,99,100]. While surgical excision is often curative, even with microscopically positive margins [98, 99], outcomes for tumors in the head and neck may be worse due to challenging surgery at this site [96]. Chemotherapy, and more recently targeted therapy with tyrosine kinase (NTRK) inhibitors, has been shown to be effective in surgically challenging or aggressive cases [97,98,99, 101].
Grossly, IFS are poorly circumscribed and lobulated, with a mean size of 5–6 cm (sometimes > 15 cm), and display fibrous or more often fleshy tan-gray cut surfaces with focal necrosis, hemorrhage or cystic degeneration [94]. Histologically, IFS are densely cellular lesions characterized by monomorphic primitive hyperchromatic ovoid to spindle cells arranged in tight fascicles (see Fig. 7c), within a variably collagenous stroma [94,95,96, 102]. Tumors are diffusely infiltrative and may display prominent dilated hemangiopericytoma-like vasculature, focal necrosis and hemorrhage, or an associated chronic inflammatory infiltrate and focally myxoid stroma (mimicking IMT) [102]. Mitotic activity is often conspicuous (> 10 per 10 HPF), but is not prognostically significant [94, 102]. The immunophenotype for IFS is non-specific, with variable expression of desmin, SMA, CD34 and S100 protein [102, 103]. Genetically, IFS harbor a t(12;15) translocation resulting in the oncogenic ETV6-NTRK3 gene fusion in up to 90% of cases [104, 105], with alternate EML4-NTRK3 fusions in a minority of cases [106]. IHC using a pan-TRK antibody is highly sensitive and specific for IFS with NTRK fusions (see Fig. 7D), typically with diffuse nuclear and cytoplasmic staining; of note, patchy staining can also be seen in a subset of FHI, DFSP, and low-grade myofibroblastic sarcoma [103, 107]. Recent studies have identified NTRK1, NTRK2, BRAF, and MET gene rearrangements in a small subset of cases [108,109,110,111].
Low-Grade Fibromyxoid Sarcoma
Low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma (LGFMS) is a deceptively bland and relatively indolent malignant fibroblastic neoplasm with a propensity for late local recurrences and metastases [112,113,114,115]. LGFMS predominantly affects young adults in the 3rd and 4th decades of life, typically presenting as a painless slow-growing deep-seated mass of the trunk or proximal extremities [113], though superficial cases have been reported [116], as well as rare cases in the head and neck [117]. In studies with long-term follow up (greater than 10 years), LGFMS follows a protracted clinical course, with local recurrence in more than half and metastases in almost half of cases, often decades after primary excision [112,113,114,115].
Grossly, tumors are circumscribed and fibrous, with a wide size range [112]. Histologically, LGFMS is characterized by bland spindle cells with a whorled growth pattern within sharply alternating collagenous and myxoid areas (Fig. 8), the latter associated with arcades of delicate thin-walled blood vessels [112,113,114]. Some tumors, previously thought to be clinically distinct and designated “hyalinizing spindle cell tumor with giant rosettes”, display prominent collagen rosettes consisting of nodules of acellular hyalinized collagen surrounded by palisading epithelioid fibroblasts (see Fig. 8b) [114]. Mitotic activity is generally low (< 1 per 10 HPF), and a subset of tumors may display foci of hypercellularity, hyperchromasia and moderate nuclear pleomorphism, or epithelioid cell morphology (resembling sclerosing epithelioid fibrosarcoma) [113]. By IHC, MUC4 is highly sensitive (> 99%) and specific for LGFMS [118]; EMA is also often positive (60–80%), and focal SMA expression is observed in around 30% of cases [117]. Genetically, LGFMS harbors recurrent t(7;16), and less frequently t(11;16), chromosomal translocations [119], resulting in the FUS-CREB3L2 (over 90%) and FUS-CREB3L1 gene fusions [120, 121], respectively, with rare reports of EWSR1-CREB3L1 gene fusions in non-FUS rearranged tumors [122].
Sclerosing Epithelioid Fibrosarcoma
Sclerosing epithelioid fibrosarcoma (SEF) is a rare, aggressive malignant fibroblastic neoplasm that typically arises in young to middle-aged adults as a slowly growing, painless deep-seated mass on the trunk or extremities, and less commonly in the head and neck [123,124,125,126,127]. SEF may present as an intraosseous neoplasm [128], including sites such as the skull, mandible, and palate, with particularly aggressive clinical behavior due to local intracranial spread and challenges in surgical resection [124,125,126]. High rates of local recurrence (> 50%), metastasis (40–50%), and tumor-related mortality are reported [123,124,125].
SEFs are generally large (> 5 cm), lobulated, grossly circumscribed masses displaying firm, gray-white, whorled cut surfaces [123, 124]. Histologically, SEFs are composed of monomorphic epithelioid cells with clear to eosinophilic cytoplasm arranged in cords, strands, and nests within a densely hyalinized sclerotic matrix (see Fig. 8c) [123]. Peripheral infiltration of surrounding muscle, fascia, or periosteum is frequently seen, with a subset of SEF showing focal necrosis or fibromyxoid regions closely resembling LGFMS [124, 129]. By IHC, 80–90% of SEFs are strongly and diffusely positive for MUC4 [129], with EMA positive in around 40% and keratins typically negative, which is helpful to distinguish SEF from metastatic carcinoma. Recurrent gene fusions of EWSR1-CREB3L1 are found in the majority of SEFs, with EWSR1-CREB3L2 or FUS-CREB3L2 more rarely reported [125, 130, 131]. Given their overlapping clinicopathologic, immunophenotypic, and molecular features, in addition to reports of tumors presenting as one and recurring as the other, as well as hybrid tumors (see Fig. 8d), LGFMS and SEF are considered to be related neoplasms [129, 131]. A recent study reported KMT2A gene rearrangements (some with a YAP1 fusion partner) in a subset of MUC4-negative SEFs [132].
Summary
Fibroblastic and myofibroblastic neoplasms of the head and neck include rare tumor types that pose significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. While some entities have characteristic histologic features, others show significant morphologic overlap (particularly on biopsy specimens) and require IHC or ancillary molecular testing for accurate diagnosis. Awareness of these entities in the head and neck and knowledge of their clinical behavior can help avoid unnecessarily aggressive treatment for benign tumors and ensure adequate surgery, systemic therapy (when relevant), and appropriate follow-up for intermediate and malignant neoplasms.
References
Bernstein KE, Lattes R. Nodular (pseudosarcomatous) fasciitis, a nonrecurrent lesion: clinicopathologic study of 134 cases. Cancer. 1982;49:1668–78.
Shimizu S, Hashimoto H, Enjoji M. Nodular fasciitis: an analysis of 250 patients. Pathology. 1984;16:161–6.
Montgomery EA, Meis JM. Nodular fasciitis. Its morphologic spectrum and immunohistochemical profile. Am J Surg Pathol. 1991;15:942–8.
Lu L, Lao IW, Liu X, Yu L, Wang J. Nodular fasciitis: a retrospective study of 272 cases from China with clinicopathologic and radiologic correlation. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2015;19:180–5.
Thompson LD, Fanburg-Smith JC, Wenig BM. Nodular fasciitis of the external ear region: a clinicopathologic study of 50 cases. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2001;5:191–8.
Gibson TC, Bishop JA, Thompson LDR. Parotid gland nodular fasciitis: a clinicopathologic series of 12 cases with a review of 18 cases from the literature. Head Neck Pathol. 2015;9:334–44.
Kikuchi I, Hiejima M, Inoue S. Nodular fasciitis. A spontaneously regressing tumor? J Dermatol. 1980;7:143–7.
Lauer DH, Enzinger FM. Cranial fasciitis of childhood. Cancer. 1980;45:401–6.
Alshareef M, Klapthor G, Alshareef A, Almadidy Z, Wright Z, Infinger L, et al. Pediatric cranial fasciitis: discussion of cases and systematic review of the literature. World Neurosurg. 2019;125:e829–42.
Kumon Y, Sakaki S, Sakoh M, Nakano K, Fukui K, Kurihara K. Cranial fasciitis of childhood: a case report. Surg Neurol. 1992;38:68–72.
Amary MF, Ye H, Berisha F, Tirabosco R, Presneau N, Flanagan AM. Detection of USP6 gene rearrangement in nodular fasciitis: an important diagnostic tool. Virchows Arch. 2013;463:97–8.
Erickson-Johnson MR, Chou MM, Evers BR, Roth CW, Seys AR, Jin L, et al. Nodular fasciitis: a novel model of transient neoplasia induced by MYH9-USP6 gene fusion. Lab Invest. 2011;91:1427–33.
Patel NR, Chrisinger JSA, Demicco EG, Sarabia SF, Reuther J, Kumar E, et al. USP6 activation in nodular fasciitis by promoter-swapping gene fusions. Mod Pathol. 2017;30:1577–88.
Salib C, Edelman M, Lilly J, Fantasia JE, Yancoskie AE. USP6 gene rearrangement by FISH analysis in cranial fasciitis: a report of three cases. Head Neck Pathol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12105-019-01018-0.
Enzinger FM. Fibrous hamartoma of infancy. Cancer. 1965;18:241–8.
Carretto E, Dall’Igna P, Alaggio R, Siracusa F, Granata C, Ferrari A, et al. Fibrous hamartoma of infancy: an Italian multi-institutional experience. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006;54:800–3.
Saab ST, McClain CM, Coffin CM. Fibrous hamartoma of infancy: a clinicopathologic analysis of 60 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2014;38:394–401.
Al-Ibraheemi A, Martinez A, Weiss SW, Kozakewich HP, Perez-Atayde AR, Tran H, et al. Fibrous hamartoma of infancy: a clinicopathologic study of 145 cases, including 2 with sarcomatous features. Mod Pathol. 2017;30:474–85.
Fletcher CD, Powell G, van Noorden S, McKee PH. Fibrous hamartoma of infancy: a histochemical and immunohistochemical study. Histopathology. 1988;12:65–74.
Park JY, Cohen C, Lopez D, Ramos E, Wagenfuehr J, Rakheja D. EGFR Exon 20 insertion/duplication mutations characterize fibrous hamartoma of infancy. Am J Surg Pathol. 2016;40:1713–8.
Ellington N, Park JY, King K, Josephs S, Rakheja D. EGFR Exon 20 insertion/duplication mutation in fibrous hamartoma of infancy with predominantly pseudoangiomatous pattern mimicking giant cell fibroblastoma. Int J Surg Pathol. 2017;25:421–4.
Neel HB, Whicker JH, Devine KD, Weiland LH. Juvenile angiofibroma: review of 120 cases. Am J Surg. 1973;126:547–56.
Witt TR, Shah JP, Sternberg SS. Juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma: a 30 year clinical review. Am J Surg. 1983;146:521–5.
Glad H, Vainer B, Buchwald C, Petersen BL, Theilgaard SA, Bonvin P, et al. Juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibromas in Denmark 1981–2003: diagnosis, incidence, and treatment. Acta Otolaryngol. 2007;127:292–9.
Boghani Z, Husain Q, Kanumuri VV, Khan MN, Sangvhi S, Liu JK, et al. Juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma: a systematic review and comparison of endoscopic, endoscopic-assisted, and open resection in 1047 cases. Laryngoscope. 2013;123:859–69.
Valanzano R, Curia MC, Aceto G, Veschi S, De Lellis L, Catalano T, et al. Genetic evidence that juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma is an integral FAP tumour. Gut. 2005;54:1046–7.
Schick B, Rippel C, Brunner C, Jung V, Plinkert PK, Urbschat S. Numerical sex chromosome aberrations in juvenile angiofibromas: genetic evidence for an androgen-dependent tumor? Oncol Rep. 2003;10:1251–5.
Beham A, Fletcher CD, Kainz J, Schmid C, Humer U. Nasopharyngeal angiofibroma: an immunohistochemical study of 32 cases. Virchows Arch A. 1993;423:281–5.
Hwang HC, Mills SE, Patterson K, Gown AM. Expression of androgen receptors in nasopharyngeal angiofibroma: an immunohistochemical study of 24 cases. Mod Pathol. 1998;11:1122–6.
Liu Z, Wang J, Wang H, Wang D, Hu L, Liu Q, et al. Hormonal receptors and vascular endothelial growth factor in juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma: immunohistochemical and tissue microarray analysis. Acta Otolaryngol. 2015;135:51–7.
Abraham SC, Montgomery EA, Giardiello FM, Wu TT. Frequent beta-catenin mutations in juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibromas. Am J Pathol. 2001;158:1073–8.
Wemmert S, Willnecker V, Kulas P, Weber S, Lerner C, Berndt S, et al. Identification of CTNNB1 mutations, CTNNB1 amplifications, and an Axin2 splice variant in juvenile angiofibromas. Tumour Biol. 2016;37:5539–49.
Balachandran K, Allen PW, MacCormac LB. Nuchal fibroma. A clinicopathological study of nine cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 1995;19:313–7.
Coffin CM, Hornick JL, Zhou H, Fletcher CDM. Gardner fibroma: a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical analysis of 45 patients with 57 fibromas. Am J Surg Pathol. 2007;31:410–6.
Michal M, Fetsch JF, Hes O, Miettinen M. Nuchal-type fibroma: a clinicopathologic study of 52 cases. Cancer. 1999;85:156–63.
Dahl NA, Sheil A, Knapke S, Geller JI. Gardner fibroma: clinical and histopathologic implications of germline APC mutation association. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2016;38:e154–7.
Vieira J, Pinto C, Afonso M, do Bom Sucesso M, Lopes P, Pinheiro M, et al. Identification of previously unrecognized FAP in children with Gardner fibroma. Eur J Hum Genet. 2015;23:715–8.
Gnepp DR, Henley J, Weiss S, Heffner D. Desmoid fibromatosis of the sinonasal tract and nasopharynx: a clinicopathologic study of 25 cases. Cancer. 1996;78:2572–9.
de Bree E, Zoras O, Hunt JL, Takes RP, Suárez C, Mendenhall WM, et al. Desmoid tumors of the head and neck: a therapeutic challenge. Head Neck. 2014;36:1517–26.
Flucke U, Tops BBJ, van Diest PJ, Slootweg PJ. Desmoid-type fibromatosis of the head and neck region in the paediatric population: a clinicopathological and genetic study of seven cases. Histopathology. 2014;64:769–76.
Kruse AL, Luebbers HT, Grätz KW, Obwegeser JA. Aggressive fibromatosis of the head and neck: a new classification based on a literature review over 40 years (1968–2008). Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;14:227–32.
Fisher C, Thway K. Aggressive fibromatosis. Pathology. 2014;46:135–40.
Burke AP, Sobin LH, Shekitka KM, Federspiel BH, Helwig EB. Intra-abdominal fibromatosis. A pathologic analysis of 130 tumors with comparison of clinical subgroups. Am J Surg Pathol. 1990;14:335–41.
Zreik RT, Fritchie KJ. Morphologic spectrum of desmoid-type fibromatosis. Am J Clin Pathol. 2016;145:332–40.
Carlson JW, Fletcher CDM. Immunohistochemistry for beta-catenin in the differential diagnosis of spindle cell lesions: analysis of a series and review of the literature. Histopathology. 2007;51:509–14.
Lazar AJF, Tuvin D, Hajibashi S, Habeeb S, Bolshakov S, Mayordomo-Aranda E, et al. Specific mutations in the beta-catenin gene (CTNNB1) correlate with local recurrence in sporadic desmoid tumors. Am J Pathol. 2008;173:1518–27.
Colombo C, Miceli R, Lazar AJ, Perrone F, Pollock RE, Le Cesne A, et al. CTNNB1 45F mutation is a molecular prognosticator of increased postoperative primary desmoid tumor recurrence: an independent, multicenter validation study. Cancer. 2013;119:3696–702.
Le Guellec S, Soubeyran I, Rochaix P, Filleron T, Neuville A, Hostein I, et al. CTNNB1 mutation analysis is a useful tool for the diagnosis of desmoid tumors: a study of 260 desmoid tumors and 191 potential morphologic mimics. Mod Pathol. 2012;25:1551–8.
Tejpar S, Nollet F, Li C, Wunder JS, Michils G, dal Cin P, et al. Predominance of beta-catenin mutations and beta-catenin dysregulation in sporadic aggressive fibromatosis (desmoid tumor). Oncogene. 1999;18:6615–20.
Jha P, Moosavi C, Fanburg-Smith JC. Giant cell fibroblastoma: an update and addition of 86 new cases from the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, in honor of Dr. Franz M. Enzinger. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2007;11:81–8.
Sandberg AA, Bridge JA. Updates on the cytogenetics and molecular genetics of bone and soft tissue tumors. Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans and giant cell fibroblastoma. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2003;140:1–12.
Thway K, Noujaim J, Jones RL, Fisher C. Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: pathology, genetics, and potential therapeutic strategies. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2016;25:64–71.
Dymock RB, Allen PW, Stirling JW, Gilbert EF, Thornbery JM. Giant cell fibroblastoma. A distinctive, recurrent tumor of childhood. Am J Surg Pathol. 1987;11:263–71.
Mentzel T, Beham A, Katenkamp D, Dei Tos AP, Fletcher CD. Fibrosarcomatous (“high-grade”) dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of a series of 41 cases with emphasis on prognostic significance. Am J Surg Pathol. 1998;22:576–87.
Abbott JJ, Oliveira AM, Nascimento AG. The prognostic significance of fibrosarcomatous transformation in dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. Am J Surg Pathol. 2006;30:436–43.
Dal Cin P, Sciot R, de Wever I, Brock P, Casteels-Van Daele M, Van Damme B, et al. Cytogenetic and immunohistochemical evidence that giant cell fibroblastoma is related to dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. Genes Chromosom Cancer. 1996;15:73–5.
Abbott JJ, Erickson-Johnson M, Wang X, Nascimento AG, Oliveira AM. Gains of COL1A1-PDGFB genomic copies occur in fibrosarcomatous transformation of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. Mod Pathol. 2006;19:1512–8.
Macarenco RS, Zamolyi R, Franco MF, Nascimento AG, Abott JJ, Wang X, et al. Genomic gains of COL1A1-PDFGB occur in the histologic evolution of giant cell fibroblastoma into dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2008;47:260–5.
Dadone-Montaudié B, Alberti L, Duc A, Delespaul L, Lesluyes T, Pérot G, et al. Alternative PDGFD rearrangements in dermatofibrosarcomas protuberans without PDGFB fusions. Mod Pathol. 2018;31:1683–93.
Dickson BC, Hornick JL, Fletcher CDM, Demicco EG, Howarth DJ, Swanson D, et al. Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans with a novel COL6A3-PDGFD fusion gene and apparent predilection for breast. Genes Chromosom Cancer. 2018;57:437–45.
Demicco EG, Park MS, Araujo DM, Fox PS, Bassett RL, Pollock RE, et al. Solitary fibrous tumor: a clinicopathological study of 110 cases and proposed risk assessment model. Mod Pathol. 2012;25:1298–306.
Smith SC, Gooding WE, Elkins M, Patel RM, Harms PW, McDaniel AS, et al. Solitary fibrous tumors of the head and neck: a Multi-Institutional Clinicopathologic Study. Am J Surg Pathol. 2017;41:1642–56.
Kao Y-C, Lin P-C, Yen S-L, Huang S-C, Tsai J-W, Li C-F, et al. Clinicopathological and genetic heterogeneity of the head and neck solitary fibrous tumours: a comparative histological, immunohistochemical and molecular study of 36 cases. Histopathology. 2016;68:492–501.
Cox DP, Daniels T, Jordan RCK. Solitary fibrous tumor of the head and neck. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontol. 2010;110:79–84.
Demicco EG, Wagner MJ, Maki RG, Gupta V, Iofin I, Lazar AJ, et al. Risk assessment in solitary fibrous tumors: validation and refinement of a risk stratification model. Mod Pathol. 2017;30:1433–42.
Thway K, Ng W, Noujaim J, Jones RL, Fisher C. The current status of solitary fibrous tumor: diagnostic features, variants, and genetics. Int J Surg Pathol. 2016;24:281–92.
Mosquera J-M, Fletcher CDM. Expanding the spectrum of malignant progression in solitary fibrous tumors: a study of 8 cases with a discrete anaplastic component–is this dedifferentiated SFT? Am J Surg Pathol. 2009;33:1314–21.
Mohajeri A, Tayebwa J, Collin A, Nilsson J, Magnusson L, von Steyern FV, et al. Comprehensive genetic analysis identifies a pathognomonic NAB2/STAT6 fusion gene, nonrandom secondary genomic imbalances, and a characteristic gene expression profile in solitary fibrous tumor. Genes Chromosom Cancer. 2013;52:873–86.
Robinson DR, Wu Y-M, Kalyana-Sundaram S, Cao X, Lonigro RJ, Sung Y-S, et al. Identification of recurrent NAB2-STAT6 gene fusions in solitary fibrous tumor by integrative sequencing. Nat Genet. 2013;45:180–5.
Chmielecki J, Crago AM, Rosenberg M, O’Connor R, Walker SR, Ambrogio L, et al. Whole-exome sequencing identifies a recurrent NAB2-STAT6 fusion in solitary fibrous tumors. Nat Genet. 2013;45:131–2.
Doyle LA, Vivero M, Fletcher CD, Mertens F, Hornick JL. Nuclear expression of STAT6 distinguishes solitary fibrous tumor from histologic mimics. Mod Pathol. 2014;27:390–5.
Bahrami A, Lee S, Schaefer I-M, Boland JM, Patton KT, Pounds S, et al. TERT promoter mutations and prognosis in solitary fibrous tumor. Mod Pathol. 2016;29:1511–22.
Demicco EG, Wani K, Ingram D, Wagner M, Maki RG, Rizzo A, et al. TERT promoter mutations in solitary fibrous tumour. Histopathology. 2018;73:843–51.
Coffin CM, Watterson J, Priest JR, Dehner LP. Extrapulmonary inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (inflammatory pseudotumor). A clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of 84 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 1995;19:859–72.
Gleason BC, Hornick JL. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumours: where are we now? J Clin Pathol. 2008;61:428–37.
He C-Y, Dong G-H, Yang D-M, Liu H-G. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinus: a clinicopathologic study of 25 cases and review of the literature. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015;272:789–97.
Idrees MT, Huan Y, Woo P, Wang BY. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor of larynx: a benign lesion with variable morphological spectrum. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2007;11:433–9.
Wenig BM, Devaney K, Bisceglia M. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor of the larynx. A clinicopathologic study of eight cases simulating a malignant spindle cell neoplasm. Cancer. 1995;76:2217–29.
Ong HS, Ji T, Zhang CP, Li J, Wang LZ, Li RR, et al. Head and neck inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT): evaluation of clinicopathologic and prognostic features. Oral Oncol. 2012;48:141–8.
LaVigne AW, Meredith DM, D’Adamo DR, Margalit DN. Treatment-refractory ALK-positive inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour of the oral cavity. BMJ Case Rep. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2017-221553.
Coffin CM, Hornick JL, Fletcher CDM. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor: comparison of clinicopathologic, histologic, and immunohistochemical features including ALK expression in atypical and aggressive cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2007;31:509–20.
Bridge JA, Kanamori M, Ma Z, Pickering D, Hill DA, Lydiatt W, et al. Fusion of the ALK gene to the clathrin heavy chain gene, CLTC, in inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor. Am J Pathol. 2001;159:411–5.
Lawrence B, Perez-Atayde A, Hibbard MK, Rubin BP, Dal Cin P, Pinkus JL, et al. TPM3-ALK and TPM4-ALK oncogenes in inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors. Am J Pathol. 2000;157:377–84.
Cook JR, Dehner LP, Collins MH, Ma Z, Morris SW, Coffin CM, et al. Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) expression in the inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor: a comparative immunohistochemical study. Am J Surg Pathol. 2001;25:1364–71.
Coffin CM, Patel A, Perkins S, Elenitoba-Johnson KS, Perlman E, Griffin CA. ALK1 and p80 expression and chromosomal rearrangements involving 2p23 in inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor. Mod Pathol. 2001;14:569–76.
Cessna MH, Zhou H, Sanger WG, Perkins SL, Tripp S, Pickering D, et al. Expression of ALK1 and p80 in inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor and its mesenchymal mimics: a study of 135 cases. Mod Pathol. 2002;15:931–8.
Mentzel T, Dry S, Katenkamp D, Fletcher CD. Low-grade myofibroblastic sarcoma: analysis of 18 cases in the spectrum of myofibroblastic tumors. Am J Surg Pathol. 1998;22:1228–38.
Chan JYK, Gooi Z, Wong EWY, Ng SK, Tong MCF, Vlantis AC. Low-grade myofibroblastic sarcoma: a population-based study. Laryngoscope. 2017;127:116–21.
Fisher C, Myofibrosarcoma. Virchows Arch. 2004;445:215–23.
Cai C, Dehner LP, El-Mofty SK. In myofibroblastic sarcomas of the head and neck, mitotic activity and necrosis define grade: a case study and literature review. Virchows Arch. 2013;463:827–36.
Montgomery E, Goldblum JR, Fisher C. Myofibrosarcoma: a clinicopathologic study. Am J Surg Pathol. 2001;25:219–28.
Qiu X, Montgomery E, Sun B. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor and low-grade myofibroblastic sarcoma: a comparative study of clinicopathologic features and further observations on the immunohistochemical profile of myofibroblasts. Hum Pathol. 2008;39:846–56.
Fletcher CD, Dal Cin P, de Wever I, Mandahl N, Mertens F, Mitelman F, et al. Correlation between clinicopathological features and karyotype in spindle cell sarcomas. A report of 130 cases from the CHAMP study group. Am J Pathol. 1999;154:1841–7.
Chung EB, Enzinger FM. Infantile fibrosarcoma. Cancer. 1976;38:729–39.
Soule EH, Pritchard DJ. Fibrosarcoma in infants and children: a review of 110 cases. Cancer. 1977;40:1711–21.
Coffin CM, Jaszcz W, O’Shea PA, Dehner LP. So-called congenital-infantile fibrosarcoma: does it exist and what is it? Pediatr Pathol. 1994;14:133–50.
Orbach D, Rey A, Cecchetto G, Oberlin O, Casanova M, Thebaud E, et al. Infantile fibrosarcoma: management based on the European experience. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:318–23.
Orbach D, Brennan B, De Paoli A, Gallego S, Mudry P, Francotte N, et al. Conservative strategy in infantile fibrosarcoma is possible: The European paediatric Soft tissue sarcoma Study Group experience. Eur J Cancer. 2016;57:1–9.
Sulkowski JP, Raval MV, Browne M. Margin status and multimodal therapy in infantile fibrosarcoma. Pediatr Surg Int. 2013;29:771–6.
Cecchetto G, Carli M, Alaggio R, Dall’Igna P, Bisogno G, Scarzello G, et al. Fibrosarcoma in pediatric patients: results of the Italian Cooperative Group studies (1979–1995). J Surg Oncol. 2001;78:225–31.
Laetsch TW, DuBois SG, Mascarenhas L, Turpin B, Federman N, Albert CM, et al. Larotrectinib for paediatric solid tumours harbouring NTRK gene fusions: phase 1 results from a multicentre, open-label, phase 1/2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19:705–14.
Sheng WQ, Hisaoka M, Okamoto S, Tanaka A, Meis-Kindblom JM, Kindblom LG, et al. Congenital-infantile fibrosarcoma. A clinicopathologic study of 10 cases and molecular detection of the ETV6-NTRK3 fusion transcripts using paraffin-embedded tissues. Am J Clin Pathol. 2001;115:348–55.
Hung YP, Fletcher CDM, Hornick JL. Evaluation of pan-TRK immunohistochemistry in infantile fibrosarcoma, lipofibromatosis-like neural tumour and histological mimics. Histopathology. 2018;73:634–44.
Knezevich SR, McFadden DE, Tao W, Lim JF, Sorensen PH. A novel ETV6-NTRK3 gene fusion in congenital fibrosarcoma. Nat Genet. 1998;18:184–7.
Bourgeois JM, Knezevich SR, Mathers JA, Sorensen PH. Molecular detection of the ETV6-NTRK3 gene fusion differentiates congenital fibrosarcoma from other childhood spindle cell tumors. Am J Surg Pathol. 2000;24:937–46.
Church AJ, Calicchio ML, Nardi V, Skalova A, Pinto A, Dillon DA, et al. Recurrent EML4-NTRK3 fusions in infantile fibrosarcoma and congenital mesoblastic nephroma suggest a revised testing strategy. Mod Pathol. 2018;31:463–73.
Rudzinski ER, Lockwood CM, Stohr BA, Vargas SO, Sheridan R, Black JO, et al. Pan-Trk immunohistochemistry identifies NTRK rearrangements in pediatric mesenchymal tumors. Am J Surg Pathol. 2018;42:927–35.
Davis JL, Lockwood CM, Stohr B, Boecking C, Al-Ibraheemi A, DuBois SG, et al. Expanding the spectrum of pediatric NTRK-rearranged mesenchymal tumors. Am J Surg Pathol. 2019;43:435–45.
Kao Y-C, Fletcher CDM, Alaggio R, Wexler L, Zhang L, Sung Y-S, et al. Recurrent BRAF gene fusions in a subset of pediatric spindle cell sarcomas: expanding the genetic spectrum of tumors with overlapping features with infantile fibrosarcoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2018;42:28–38.
Wegert J, Vokuhl C, Collord G, Del Castillo Velasco-Herrera M, Farndon SJ, Guzzo C, et al. Recurrent intragenic rearrangements of EGFR and BRAF in soft tissue tumors of infants. Nat Commun. 2018;9:2378.
Flucke U, van Noesel MM, Wijnen M, Zhang L, Chen C-L, Sung Y-S, et al. TFG-MET fusion in an infantile spindle cell sarcoma with neural features. Genes Chromosom Cancer. 2017;56:663–7.
Evans HL. Low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma. A report of 12 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 1993;17:595–600.
Evans HL. Low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma: a clinicopathologic study of 33 cases with long-term follow-up. Am J Surg Pathol. 2011;35:1450–62.
Folpe AL, Lane KL, Paull G, Weiss SW. Low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma and hyalinizing spindle cell tumor with giant rosettes: a clinicopathologic study of 73 cases supporting their identity and assessing the impact of high-grade areas. Am J Surg Pathol. 2000;24:1353–60.
Guillou L, Benhattar J, Gengler C, Gallagher G, Ranchère-Vince D, Collin F, et al. Translocation-positive low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma: clinicopathologic and molecular analysis of a series expanding the morphologic spectrum and suggesting potential relationship to sclerosing epithelioid fibrosarcoma: a study from the French Sarcoma Group. Am J Surg Pathol. 2007;31:1387–402.
Billings SD, Giblen G, Fanburg-Smith JC. Superficial low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma (Evans tumor): a clinicopathologic analysis of 19 cases with a unique observation in the pediatric population. Am J Surg Pathol. 2005;29:204–10.
Cowan ML, Thompson LD, Leon ME, Bishop JA. Low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma of the head and neck: a clinicopathologic series and review of the literature. Head Neck Pathol. 2016;10:161–6.
Doyle LA, Möller E, Dal Cin P, Fletcher CDM, Mertens F, Hornick JL. MUC4 is a highly sensitive and specific marker for low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2011;35:733–41.
Reid R, de Silva MVC, Paterson L, Ryan E, Fisher C. Low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma and hyalinizing spindle cell tumor with giant rosettes share a common t(7;16)(q34;p11) translocation. Am J Surg Pathol. 2003;27:1229–36.
Mertens F, Fletcher CDM, Antonescu CR, Coindre J-M, Colecchia M, Domanski HA, et al. Clinicopathologic and molecular genetic characterization of low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma, and cloning of a novel FUS/CREB3L1 fusion gene. Lab Invest. 2005;85:408–15.
Panagopoulos I, Storlazzi CT, Fletcher CDM, Fletcher JA, Nascimento A, Domanski HA, et al. The chimeric FUS/CREB3l2 gene is specific for low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma. Genes Chromosom Cancer. 2004;40:218–28.
Lau PPL, Lui PCW, Lau GTC, Yau DTW, Cheung ETY, Chan JKC. EWSR1-CREB3L1 gene fusion: a novel alternative molecular aberration of low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2013;37:734–8.
Meis-Kindblom JM, Kindblom LG, Enzinger FM. Sclerosing epithelioid fibrosarcoma. A variant of fibrosarcoma simulating carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 1995;19:979–93.
Antonescu CR, Rosenblum MK, Pereira P, Nascimento AG, Woodruff JM. Sclerosing epithelioid fibrosarcoma: a study of 16 cases and confirmation of a clinicopathologically distinct tumor. Am J Surg Pathol. 2001;25:699–709.
Prieto-Granada C, Zhang L, Chen H-W, Sung Y-S, Agaram NP, Jungbluth AA, et al. A genetic dichotomy between pure sclerosing epithelioid fibrosarcoma (SEF) and hybrid SEF/low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma: a pathologic and molecular study of 18 cases. Genes Chromosom Cancer. 2015;54:28–38.
Folk GS, Williams SB, Foss RB, Fanburg-Smith JC. Oral and maxillofacial sclerosing epithelioid fibrosarcoma: report of five cases. Head Neck Pathol. 2007;1:13–20.
Eyden BP, Manson C, Banerjee SS, Roberts IS, Harris M. Sclerosing epithelioid fibrosarcoma: a study of five cases emphasizing diagnostic criteria. Histopathology. 1998;33:354–60.
Wojcik JB, Bellizzi AM, Dal Cin P, Bredella MA, Fletcher CDM, Hornicek FJ, et al. Primary sclerosing epithelioid fibrosarcoma of bone: analysis of a series. Am J Surg Pathol. 2014;38:1538–44.
Doyle LA, Wang W-L, Dal Cin P, Lopez-Terrada D, Mertens F, Lazar AJF, et al. MUC4 is a sensitive and extremely useful marker for sclerosing epithelioid fibrosarcoma: association with FUS gene rearrangement. Am J Surg Pathol. 2012;36:1444–51.
Arbajian E, Puls F, Magnusson L, Thway K, Fisher C, Sumathi VP, et al. Recurrent EWSR1-CREB3L1 gene fusions in sclerosing epithelioid fibrosarcoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2014;38:801–8.
Arbajian E, Puls F, Antonescu CR, Amary F, Sciot R, Debiec-Rychter M, et al. In-depth genetic analysis of sclerosing epithelioid fibrosarcoma reveals recurrent genomic alterations and potential treatment targets. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23:7426–34.
Kao Y-C, Lee J-C, Zhang L, Sung Y-S, Swanson D, Hsieh T-H, et al. Recurrent YAP1 and KMT2A gene rearrangements in a subset of MUC4-negative sclerosing epithelioid fibrosarcoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000001382.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Baranov, E., Hornick, J.L. Soft Tissue Special Issue: Fibroblastic and Myofibroblastic Neoplasms of the Head and Neck. Head and Neck Pathol 14, 43–58 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12105-019-01104-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12105-019-01104-3