Abstract
Biological hydrogen (H2) production by dark and photo-fermentative organisms is a promising area of research for generating bioenergy. A large number of organisms have been widely studied for producing H2 from diverse feeds, both as pure and as mixed cultures. However, their H2 producing efficiencies have been found to vary (from 3 to 8 mol/mol hexose) with physiological conditions, type of organisms and composition of feed (starchy waste from sweet potato, wheat, cassava and algal biomass). The present review deals with the possibilities of enhancing H2 production by integrating metabolic pathways of different organisms-dark fermentative bacteria (from cattle dung, activated sludge, Caldicellulosiruptor, Clostridium, Enterobacter, Lactobacillus, and Vibrio) and photo-fermentative bacteria (such as Rhodobacter, Rhodobium and Rhodopseudomonas). The emphasis has been laid on systems which are driven by undefined dark-fermentative cultures in combination with pure photo-fermentative bacterial cultures using biowaste as feed. Such an integrative approach may prove suitable for commercial applications on a large scale.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Hydrogen (H2) has been recognized as fuel for the future due to its high efficiency (122 kJ/g) and eco-friendly nature in comparison to fossil fuels [1, 2]. Biological H2 production (BHP) process has been widely studied under dark- and photo-fermentative conditions. With these approaches the yields of H2 have been quite low in comparison to the theoretically achievable values of 4 and 8 mol/mol of glucose under dark and photo-fermentative conditions, respectively [2–7]. Quite a few research efforts have been made to overcome the limitations of these processes. It has been realized that in order to recover maximum H2 from the organic matter, it is necessary to further use the end-products of the dark fermentative process, especially volatile fatty acids (VFA). It is possible to convert VFAs to H2 by photosynthetic bacteria. The potential of exploiting these processes in various combinations have been reviewed to some extent [7–10]. However a large number of hurdles still seem to persist such as: (i) in the dark-fermentative process—(a) relatively lower H2 yield (b) the need for strict anaerobic conditions for high H2 producers, and (c) thermodynamic instability of the process at higher H2 concentrations, and (ii) during the photo-fermentative process—(a) sensitivity of the H2 production process to nitrogen content of the feed (b) effect to light intensity and duration of radiation under outdoor (sunlight) and indoor (artificial light sources) conditions, and (c) types of bioreactors required for H2 production [2, 11–14].
High cost of the feed and operational conditions is the major limiting factor of BHP. Most basic studies have been carried out on simple and complex sugars as feed material [15–21]. For circumventing the issues related to cost of the feed, biowastes of diverse origins especially agricultural, food and fruit processing industries, and those of municipal markets have been suggested as cheap and renewable alternatives [2, 22–28]. Although, the amount of H2 generated from different biowastes encourages one to pursue this route however, it demands quite a bit of optimization at different stages [29–34]. Instead of dwelling on optimization efforts being made on individual parameters of BHP process, an emerging proposal is to combine the dark- and photo-fermentative H2 producing organisms [7, 10, 35, 36]. The efforts in this direction have been targeted on the following combinations: (i) using defined dark- and photo-fermentative H2 producing organisms in a sequential manner in two independent stages (ii) using undefined dark-fermentative H2-producers along with defined photosynthetic organisms in two stages (iii) using the two types of BHP processes into a single stage, and (iv) using effluent from a dark-fermentative process (not necessarily a H2 production reactor) and exploiting photo-fermentative bacteria for their H2 producing abilities [33, 37–48]. In our recent efforts, we have emphasized only on using defined bacterial cultures in a sequential manner and evaluate it with respect to their individual H2 producing abilities from pure substrates and biowastes [7]. In the present work, we are concentrating our efforts on studies conducted using undefined dark fermentative H2 producing culture combinations and exploitation of effluent from dark-fermentative process by photosynthetic organisms using biowaste as feed.
Biological Hydrogen Production
Integrative Two Stage Dark- and Photo-Fermentative Sequential Hydrogen Production
The physiology and metabolic activities of bacteria vary significantly under dark- and photo-fermentative conditions. The efficiency depends primarily on the types of enzymes involved in H2 evolution. Under dark-fermentative conditions, hydrogenase and nitrogenase are the major enzymes responsible for this process [2, 49]. In the overall conversion of feed to H2, a few intermediates are also generated, such as VFAs and alcohols. The efficiency of the dark-fermentative H2 evolution process is governed by VFAs (Eqs. 1–4), such that acetic acid generation can lead to an additional 4 mol of H2 whereas butyric acid is expected to generate 2 mol of H2/mol of substrate. Lactic acid and ethanol are considered to be counter-productive to H2 evolution process [2, 28]. The intermediates of the dark-fermentative BHP, such as acetic and butyric acid can be taken up by photosynthetic organisms to generate additional H2 (Eqs. 5–6) [45, 46, 50, 51].
Using the organisms present in activated sludge enriched for dark-fermentative H2-producers, along with photosynthetic organisms such as Rhodobacter sphaeroides, Rhodopseudomonas palustris and undefined photosynthetic bacteria, it has been possible to achieve 2.86–6.07 mol H2/mol hexose [34, 52], over an incubation period ranging from 1 to 6 days of dark-fermentation followed by 5–14 days of photo-fermentative phase [53, 54]. In most of the cases, the temperature of 31–37 °C has been found to be optimal during the dark phase and 30 °C during the light phase (Table 1). In these cases, starchy wastes have been employed, which had originated from wheat, rice and cassava (Table 1). In other studies, cattle dung, dairy manure and mixed cultures in combinations with Rhodobacter capsulatus, R. palustris, and R. sphaeroides, and their combinations have been shown to yield 3.40–7.15 mol H2/mol hexose [33, 38, 43, 47, 55, 56]. In these cases, starchy wastes, cheese whey and water hyacinth have been fermented for quite long periods 2–10 days of the dark phase followed by 11–21 days of the light period and exceptionally it was 90/100 days under repeated batch culture [47]. In a few other combinations of dark and photosynthetic bacteria, Caldicellulosiruptor, Clostridium, Klebsiella, Lactobacillus and Thermotoga in association with R. capsulatus, R. sphaeroides, Rhodobium marinum and R. palustris have been used for H2 production (Table 1). These integrative approches of two stage H2 production have proved effective as most of them have lead to yields up to 7.2 mol/mol hexose [30]. In dark-fermentative BHP, the H2 yields are quite low in most cases and exceptionally it is posible to achieve a value of 3.8 mol H2/mol hexose [57]. In contrast, the two stage integrative approach is much more effective and exceptionally only it falls around 2.8–3.9 mol/mol hexose [45, 51, 58]. A summary of the results of yields of ≥7.0 mol H2/mol hexose reveals that it has been achieved with combinations such as (i) mixed culture—R. palustris and water hyacinth (10 g/l) [33], (ii) Clostridium butyricum—R. sphaeroides—algal biomass (starch at the rate of 5 g/l) [31], (iii) C. butyricum and Enterobacter aerogenes—R. sphaeroides/Rhodobacter sp. and sweet potato starch (5–10 g/l) [30, 59].
A perusal of Table 1 allows us to draw a few conclusions on the significance of the roles of photosynthetic organisms in influencing H2 yields in the integrative BHP process. Here, it can be observed that photo-fermentative organisms can utilize different biowastes to produce high H2 yields—(i) R. sphaeroides could evolve 3.81–8.30 mol H2/mol hexose (ii) R. capsulatus yielded 3.90–6.85 mol H2/mol hexose, and (iii) R. palustris was also effective in generating up to 7.15 mol H2/mol hexose [31–33, 53, 58]. In view of the effective working of the photosynthetic partners in the integrated BHP process, the observed variations in H2 yields can be assigned to the dark-fermentative H2-producers. Dark-fermentative bacteria present in the activated sludge were relatively less effective in producing H2 in comparison to those present in cattle dung. Among the defined dark fermentative bacteria, C. butyricum alone or in association with E. aerogenes was quite consistent in yielding 7–8 mol H2/mol hexose, along with R. sphaeroides as the photo-fermentative partner [31, 59]. H2 yields did not vary when R. capsulatus was used in association with a wide range of dark-fermentative H2-producers [47, 51, 57, 58, 60]. In contrast to R. sphaeroides, the combination of C. butyricum and R. palustris did not prove to be the most effective H2-producing culture combination [37].
Integrative Single Stage Dark and Photo-Fermentative Hydrogen Production
In contrast to subjecting feed material to dark- and photo-fermentative bacteria under two different sets of conditions, attempts have been made to combine the two (Table 2). Combination of activated sludge (as source of dark-fermentative H2-producers) with R. sphaeroides has resulted in H2 yield of 0.3–3.4 mol/mol hexose [39, 61–63]. The variation in H2 yields could be assigned to differences in substrate concentration, inoculum ratios, light intensities, etc. [39, 63]. In most of the reports, batch and fed-batch mode of reactors have been employed. The best results of 3.4 mol H2/mol hexose were reported when wheat starch was used at the rate of 5 g/l with an inoculum ratio of 1:3 (of dark/photo-fermentative bacteria) in continuous mode (periodic feed) [63].
In other experiments, low H2 yields in the range of 1.05–1.16 mol/mol hexose were recorded on substituting R. sphaeroides with Rhodobacter sp. and R. palustris combination, along with activated sludge and wheat starch (as feed) [64, 65] and quite high yield of 2.76 mol/mol hexose with pure culture [66]. It allowed one to conclude the superiority of R. sphaeroides as a photo-fermentative partner. The high H2 yielding capacity of R. sphaeroides was negatively affected when combined with Clostridium beijerinckii as the dark-fermentative partner–resulting in low H2 yield of 0.6 mol/mol hexose [41]. R. marium proved to be an effective H2-producer, which resulted in high yields of 7.3 mol/mol hexose with Lactobacillus amylovorus and 6.2 mol/mol hexose with Vibrio fluvialis [29, 67]. Incidentally, in spite of being such highly effective H2-poducers, L. amylovorus and V. fluvialis have not been pursued since their initial reports.
Perspectives
Among the different worries which loom large are the pollution due to burning of fossil fuels and their limited resources. Although biohydrogen has been identified as a clean alternative to ever polluting fossil fuels, however, in order to establish biohydrogen as a non-polluting energy carrier it is imperative to carry out innovative research. At present, the struggle is on to look for cheap sources of feed and robust microbes for commercial scale H2 production. The need stems from the fact that BHP is regarded as inefficient due to low yields. Theoretically 12 mol of H2 can be generated from each mol of glucose. However, in practice, H2 yields are stagnant, such that a maximum of 3.8 mol/mol glucose has been shown as the achievable limit with either dark- or photo-fermentative routes by a limited number of bacteria. It was however realized quite soon that H2 yields can be enhanced by combining the two metabolic routes. Here, VFAs especially acetic acid and butyric acid generated as the end products of dark fermentative H2-production process can be subjected to photo-fermentative bacteria. Theoretically, acetic acid can be converted to generate 4 mol of H2 [50]. Such that a H2 yield of 12 mol/mole glucose can be achieved by employing an integrative approach–dark followed by photo-fermentation [7]. The need is to optimize the various process parameters and thus improve the efficiency of the organisms. Since, bacteria exist largely as complex communities, they create conditions such that ecological selection persists and the most productive system prevails. Taking advantage of the abilities of the bacteria to occur as mixed cultures and as consortia, it is desirable to select bacteria which are compatible to each other and exploit their natural abilities to accomplish our purpose. Facultative anaerobes such as Bacillus and Enterobacter have abilities to produce H2 in quantities which are quite comparable to those produced by strict anaerobic (Clostridium). They however offer additional advantages in terms of their abilities to survive in the presence of O2 during the initial stage of anaerobic biodegradation and produce H2 efficiently. They also offer an added feature by quenching O2 in cases where Clostridium may be the associated H2-producer [68, 69]. In case of photo-fermentation, light intensity is a major requirement for most metabolic activities. During photo-fermentative BHP, nitrogenase enzyme requires energy for the H2 production, which is provided by the light energy conversion to ATP [70]. It has been shown that increase in the light energy does enhance BHP [39], although exceptionally it may not prove effective [71]. We can design complex communities consisting of robust and self stabilizing populations. This syntrophic association must be managed for the sustainable development. It is envisaged that the feasibility of these two stage processes can be established by combining it with microalgae photosynthesis processes, which is likely to enhance overall H2 production by utilizing CO2 produced in the previous stages [37]. From a commercial point of view, it may be necessary to integrate other processes such as bioplastic and methane production in it [4, 7, 17, 72–75].
References
Kalia VC (2007) Microbial treatment of domestic and industrial wastes for bioenergy production. Appl Microbiol (e-Book). National Science Digital Library NISCAIR, New Delhi, India. http://nsdl.niscair.res.in/bitstream/123456789/650/1/DomesticWaste.pdf
Kalia VC, Purohit HJ (2008) Microbial diversity and genomics in aid of bioenergy. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 35:403–419
Kalia VC, Lal S, Ghai R, Mandal M, Chauhan A (2003) Mining genomic databases to identify novel hydrogen producers. Trends Biotechnol 21:152–156
Angenent LT, Karim K, Al-Dahhan MH, Wrenn BA, Domíguez-Espinosa R (2004) Production of bioenergy and biochemicals from industrial and agricultural wastewater. Trends Biotechnol 22:477–485
Levin DB, Pitt L, Love M (2004) Biohydrogen production: prospects and limitations to practical application. Int J Hydrogen Energy 29:173–185
Lee HS, Vermaas WFJ, Rittmann BE (2010) Biological hydrogen production: prospects and challenges. Trends Biotechnol 28:262–271
Patel SKS, Kumar P, Kalia VC (2012) Enhancing biological hydrogen production through complementary microbial metabolisms. Int J Hydrogen Energy. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.04.045
Hallenbeck PC, Ghosh D, Skonieczny MT, Yargeau V (2009) Microbiological and engineering aspects of biohydrogen production. Indian J Microbiol 49:48–59
Hallenbeck PC, Ghosh D (2009) Advances in fermentative biohydrogen production: the way forward? Trends Biotechnol 27:287–297
Argun H, Kargi F (2011) Bio-hydrogen production by different operational modes of dark and photo-fermentation: an overview. Int J Hydrogen Energy 36:7443–7459
Kotay SM, Das D (2008) Biohydrogen as a renewable energy resource—prospects and potentials. Int J Hydrogen Energy 33:258–263
Hallenbeck PC (2009) Fermentative hydrogen production: principles, progress and prognosis. Int J Hydrogen Energy 34:7379–7389
Dasgupta CN, Gilbert JJ, Lindblad P, Heidorn T, Borgvang SA, Skjanes K, Das D (2010) Recent trends on the development of photobiological processes and photobioreactors for the improvement of hydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energy 35:10218–10238
Hallenbeck PC, Abo-Hashesh M, Ghosh D (2012) Strategies for improving biological hydrogen production. Bioresour Technol 110:1–9
Carere CR, Kalia V, Sparling R, Cicek N, Levin DB (2008) Pyruvate catabolism and hydrogen synthesis pathway genes of Clostridium thermocellum ATCC 27405. Indian J Microbiol 48:252–266
Pan C-M, Fan Y-T, Zhao P, Hou H-W (2008) Fermentative hydrogen production by the newly isolated Clostridium beijerinckii Fanp3. Int J Hydrogen Energy 33:5383–5391
Porwal S, Kumar T, Lal S, Rani A, Kumar S, Cheema S, Purohit HJ, Sharma R, Patel SKS, Kalia VC (2008) Hydrogen and polyhydroxybutyrate producing abilities of microbes from diverse habitats by dark fermentative process. Bioresour Technol 99:5444–5451
Ren N-Q, Liu B-F, Ding J, Xie G-J (2009) Hydrogen production with R. faecalis RLD-53 isolated from freshwater pond sludge. Bioresour Technol 100:484–487
deVrije T, Budde MAW, Lips SJ, Bakker RR, Mars AE, Claassen PAM (2010) Hydrogen production from carrot pulp by the extreme thermophiles Caldicellulosiruptor saccharolyticus and Thermotoga neapolitana. Int J Hydrogen Energy 35:13206–13213
Patel SKS, Purohit HJ, Kalia VC (2010) Dark fermentative hydrogen production by defined mixed microbial cultures immobilized on ligno-cellulosic waste materials. Int J Hydrogen Energy 35:10674–10681
Ghosh D, Hallenbeck PC (2009) Fermentative hydrogen yields from different sugars by batch cultures of metabolically engineered Escherichia coli DJT135. Int J Hydrogen Energy 34:7979–7982
Kalia VC, Jain SR, Kumar A, Joshi AP (1994) Fermentation of biowaste to hydrogen by Bacillus licheniformis. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 10:224–227
Kalia VC, Joshi AP (1995) Conversion of waste biomass (pea-shell) into hydrogen and methane through anaerobic digestion. Bioresour Technol 53:165–168
Sonakya V, Raizada N, Kalia VC (2001) Microbial and enzymatic improvement of anaerobic digestion of waste biomass. Biotechnol Lett 23:1463–1466
Kapdan IK, Kargi F (2006) Bio-hydrogen production from waste materials. Enzyme Microb Technol 38:569–582
Balat H, Kirtay E (2010) Hydrogen from biomass present–scenario and future prospects. Int J Hydrogen Energy 35:7416–7426
Levin DB, Chahine R (2010) Challenges for renewable hydrogen production from biomass. Int J Hydrogen Energy 35:4962–4969
Patel SKS, Singh M, Kumar P, Purohit HJ, Kalia VC (2012) Exploitation of defined bacterial cultures for production of hydrogen and polyhydroxybutyrate from pea-shells. Biomass Bioenergy 36:218–225
Kawaguchi H, Hashimoto K, Hirata K, Miyamoto K (2001) H2 production from algal biomass by a mixed culture of Rhodobium marinum A-501 and Lactobacillus amylovorus. J Biosci Bioeng 91:277–282
Yokoi H, Maki R, Hirose J, Hayashi S (2002) Microbial production of hydrogen from starch-manufacturing wastes. Biomass Bioenergy 22:389–395
Kim M-S, Baek J-S, Yun Y-S, Sim S-J, Park S, Kim S-C (2006) Hydrogen production from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii biomass using a two-step conversion process: anaerobic conversion and photosynthetic fermentation. Int J Hydrogen Energy 31:812–816
Ozgur E, Mars AE, Peksel B, Louwerse A, Yucel M, Gunduz U, Claassen PAM, Eroglu I (2010) Biohydrogen production from beet molasses by sequential dark and photo-fermentation. Int J Hydrogen Energy 35:511–517
Su H, Cheng J, Zhou J, Song W, Cen K (2010) Hydrogen production from water hyacinth through dark- and photo-fermentation. Int J Hydrogen Energy 35:8929–8937
Cheng J, Su H, Zhou J, Song W, Cen K (2011) Hydrogen production by mixed bacteria through dark- and photo-fermentation. Int J Hydrogen Energy 36:450–457
Redwood MD, Beedle MP, Macaskie LE (2009) Integrating dark and light bio-hydrogen production strategies: towards the hydrogen economy. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 8:149–185
Guwy AJ, Dinsdale RM, Kim JR, Massanet-Nicolau J, Premier G (2011) Fermentative biohydrogen production systems integration. Bioresour Technol 102:8534–8542
Lo Y-C, Chen S-D, Chen C-Y, Huang T-I, Lin C-Y, Chang J-S (2008) Combining enzymatic hydrolysis and dark-photo fermentation processes for hydrogen production from starch feedstock: a feasibility study. Int J Hydrogen Energy 33:5224–5233
Zong W, Yu R, Zhang P, Fan M, Zhou Z (2009) Efficient hydrogen gas production from cassava and food waste by a two-step process of dark fermentation and photo-fermentation. Biomass Bioenergy 33:1458–1463
Argun H, Kargi F (2010) Effects of light source, intensity and lighting regime on bio-hydrogen production from ground wheat starch by combined dark and photo-fermentations. Int J Hydrogen Energy 35:1604–1612
Argun H, Kargi F (2010) Photo-fermentative hydrogen gas production from dark fermentation effluent of ground wheat solution: effects of light source and light intensity. Int J Hydrogen Energy 35:1595–1603
Argun H, Kargi F (2010) Bio-hydrogen production from ground wheat starch by continuous combined fermentation using annular-hybrid bioreactor. Int J Hydrogen Energy 35:6170–6178
Kargi F, Ozmihci S (2010) Effects of dark/light bacteria ratio on bio-hydrogen production by combined fed-batch fermentation of ground wheat starch. Int J Hydrogen Energy 34:869–874
Yang H, Guo L, Liu F (2010) Enhanced bio-hydrogen production from corncob by a two-step process: dark- and photo-fermentation. Bioresour Technol 101:2049–2052
Wu X, Li Q, Dieudonne M, Cong Y, Zhou J, Long M (2010) Enhanced H2 gas production from bagasse using adhE inactivated Klebsiella oxytoca HP1 by sequential dark-photo fermentations. Bioresour Technol 101:9605–9611
Afsar N, Özgür E, Gürgan M, Akköse S, Yücel M, Gündüz U, Eroglu I (2011) Hydrogen productivity of photosynthetic bacteria on dark fermenter effluent of potato steam peels hydrolysate. Int J Hydrogen Energy 36:432–438
Androga DD, Ozgur E, Eroglu I, Gunduz U, Yucel M (2012) Amelioration of photofermentative hydrogen production from molasses dark fermenter effluent by zeolite-based removal of ammonium ion. Int J Hydrogen Energy. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.02.177
Laurinavichene TV, Belokopytov BF, Laurinavichius KS, Khusnutdinova AN, Seibert M, Tsygankov AA (2012) Towards the integration of dark- and photo-fermentative waste treatment. 4. Repeated batch sequential dark- and photofermentation using starch as substrate. Int J Hydrogen Energy 37:8800–8810
Özkan E, Uyar B, Özgür E, Yücel M, Eroglu I, Gündüz U (2012) Photofermentative hydrogen production using dark fermentation effluent of sugar beet thick juice in outdoor conditions. Int J Hydrogen Energy 37:2044–2049
Das D, Dutta T, Nath K, Kotay SM, Das AK, Veziroglu TN (2006) Role of Fe-hydrogenase in biological hydrogen production. Curr Sci 90:1627–1637
Fang HHP, Liu H, Zhang T (2005) Phototrophic hydrogen production from acetate and butyrate in wastewater. Int J Hydrogen Energy 90:785–793
Özgür E, Afsar N, Vrije T, Yücel M, Gündüz U, Classen PAM, Eroglu I (2010) Potential use of thermophile dark fermentation effluents in photofermentative hydrogen production by Rhodobacter capsulatus. J Clean Prod 18:S23–S28
Su H, Cheng J, Zhou J, Song W, Cen K (2009) Improving hydrogen production from cassava starch by combination of dark and photo fermentation. Int J Hydrogen Energy 34:1780–1786
Argun H, Kargi F, Kapdan IK, Oztekin R (2008) Light fermentation of dark fermentation effluent for bio-hydrogen production by different Rhodobacter species at different initial volatile fatty acid (VFA) concentrations. Int J Hydrogen Energy 33:7405–7412
Cheng J, Su H, Zhou J, Song W, Cen K (2011) Microwave-assisted alkali pretreatment of rice straw to promote enzymatic hydrolysis and hydrogen production in dark- and photo-fermentation. Int J Hydrogen Energy 36:2093–2101
Azbar N, Dokgoz FTC (2010) The effect of dilution and l-malic acid addition on bio-hydrogen production with Rhodopseudomonas palustris from effluent of an acidogenic anaerobic reactor. Int J Hydrogen Energy 35:5028–5033
Laurinavichene TV, Belokopytov BF, Laurinavichius KS, Tekucheva DN, Seibert M, Tsygankov AA (2010) Towards the integration of dark- and photo-fermentative waste treatment. 3. Potato as substrate for sequential dark fermentation and light-driven H2 production. Int J Hydrogen Energy 35:8536–8543
de Vrije T, Bakker RR, Budde MAW, Lai MH, Mars AE, Claassen PAM (2009) Efficient hydrogen production from the lignocellulosic energy crop Miscanthus by the extreme thermophilic bacteria Caldicellulosiruptor saccharolyticus and Thermotoga neapolitana. Biotechnol Biofuels 2:12
Abd-Alla MH, Morsy FM, El-Enany A-WE (2011) Hydrogen production from rotten dates by sequential three stages fermentation. Int J Hydrogen Energy 36:13518–13527
Yokoi H, Saitsu A, Uchida H, Hirose J, Hayashi S, Takasaki Y (2001) Microbial hydrogen production from sweet potato starch residue. J Biosci Bioeng 91:58–63
Uyar B, Schumacher M, Gebicki J, Modigell M (2009) Photoproduction of hydrogen by Rhodobacter capsulatus from thermophilic fermentation effluent. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 32:603–606
Ozmihci S, Kargi F (2010) Effects of starch loading rate on performance of combined fed-batch fermentation of ground wheat for bio-hydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energy 35:1106–1111
Ozmihci S, Kargi F (2010) Comparison of different mixed cultures for bio-hydrogen production from ground wheat starch by combined dark and light fermentation. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 37:341–347
Sagnak R, Kargi F (2011) Photo-fermentative hydrogen gas production from dark fermentation effluent of acid hydrolyzed wheat starch with periodic feeding. Int J Hydrogen Energy 36:4348–4353
Argun H, Kargi F, Kapdan IK (2009) Effects of the substrate and cell concentration on hydrogen production from ground wheat by combined dark and light fermentation. Int J Hydrogen Energy 34:6181–6188
Argun H, Kargi F, Kapdan IK (2009) Hydrogen production by combined dark and light fermentation of ground wheat solution. Int J Hydrogen Energy 34:4305–4311
Vatsala TM, Raj SM, Manimaran A (2008) A pilot-scale study of biohydrogen production from distillery effluent using defined bacterial co-culture. Int J Hydrogen Energy 33:5404–5415
Ike A, Murakawa T, Kawaguchi H, Hirata K, Miyamoto K (1999) Photoproduction of hydrogen from raw starch using a Halophilic bacterial community. J Biosci Bioeng 88:72–77
Yokoi H, Mori S, Hirose J, Hayashi S, Takasaki Y (1998) H2 production from starch by mixed culture of Clostridium butyricum and Rhodobacter sp M-19. Biotechnol Lett 20:895–899
Hung C-H, Cheng C-H, Guan D-W, Wang S-T, Hsu S-C, Liang C-M, Lin C-Y (2011) Interactions between Clostridium sp. and other facultative anaerobes in a self-formed granular sludge hydrogen-producing bioreactor. Int J Hydrogen Energy 36:8704–8711
Boran E, Özgür E, Yücel M, Gündüz U, Eroglu I (2012) Biohydrogen production by Rhodobacter capsulatus in solar tubular photobioreactor on thick juice dark fermenter effluent. J Clean Prod 31:150–157
Reungsang A, Sangyoka S, Chaiprasert P, Imai T (2007) Factors affecting hydrogen production from Cassava wastewater by a co-culture of anaerobic sludge and Rhodospirillum rubrum. Pak J Biol Sci 10:3571–3577
Kalia VC, Chauhan A, Bhattacharyya G, Rashmi (2003) Genomic databases yield novel bioplastic producers. Nat Biotechnol 21:845–846
Kumar T, Singh M, Purohit HJ, Kalia VC (2009) Potential of Bacillus sp. to produce polyhydroxybutyrate from biowaste. J Appl Microbiol 106:2017–2023
Singh M, Patel SKS, Kalia VC (2009) Bacillus subtilis as potential producer for polyhydroxyalkanoates. Microb Cell Fact 8:38
Patel SKS, Singh M, Kalia VC (2011) Hydrogen and polyhydroxybutyrate producing abilities of Bacillus spp. from glucose in two stage system. Indian J Microbiol 51:418–423
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank Director of CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology and Department of Biotechnology (DBT) Biology for providing the necessary funds, facilities and moral support. SKSP is thankful to CSIR for granting Research Associate Fellowship.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Patel, S.K.S., Kalia, V.C. Integrative Biological Hydrogen Production: An Overview. Indian J Microbiol 53, 3–10 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-012-0287-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-012-0287-6