Abstract
Background
Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) may contribute to the complications and it is assumed that eliminating cardiopulmonary bypass has the potential of reducing post operative morbidity after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The study was carried out to compare mortality and morbidity in the off-pump and on-pump CABG groups.
Methods
We prospectively analysed 200 patients undergoing CABG. Group A consists of 100 patients underwent multi-vessel off-pump CABG and group B consists of 100 patients underwent CABG with CPB. The incidence of complications (mortality, re-exploration for bleeding, myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation, neurological events, new onset renal failure (s. creatinine>1.6 mg/dL) pulmonary complications, length of ICU stay and hospital stay were recorded, analysed and compared.
Results
OPCAB patients received 2.73±0.61 grafts/patient and on-pump CABG patients received 3.39±0.75 grafts/patient (p value<0.00001). There was no significant statistical difference in mortality, incidence of stroke between OPCAB and CABG with CPB patients. Length of ICU stay was 32.84±4.22 vs 44.85±7.18 hrs (p value<0.00001) and hospital stay was 6.52±0.69 vs 7.94±0.92 days (p value<0.00001) between group A and group B respectively. Incidence of atrial fibrillation was less in OPCAB group 7% vs 12% although it was statistically not significant (p value 0.33). It was observed in our study that there was no significant deference in worsening of existing renal failure between on-pump CABG and OPCAB 6% vs 2% (P value 0.28). Blood utilization was significantly less in OPCAB group (p value<0.001).
Conclusion
There was no statistically significant difference in terms of mortality, incidence of stroke and new onset renal failure in both groups. But there was lesser incidence of post operative atrial fibrillation, worsening of existing renal failure in off-pump group though statistically not significant. There was significant reduction in blood utilization, length of ICU and hospital stay in OPCAB group.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Cooley, DA Con. beating heart surgery for coronary revascularization: is it the most important development since the introduction of heart lung machine? Ann Thorac Surg 2000: 70: 1779–81.
Kolessov VI Mammary artery-coronary artery anastomosis as a method of treatment for angina pectons. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1967; 54: 535–44.
Benetti FJ. Direct coronary surgery with saphenous vein bypass without either cardiopulmonary bypass or cardiac arrest. J Cardiovasc Surg 1985; 26: 217–22.
Buffalo E, de Andrade JC, Braco JN, Teles CA, Aguiar LF, Gomes WJ. Coronary artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 1996; 61: 63–66.
Puskas JD, Wright CE, Ronson RS, Brown WM, Gott JP, Guyton RA. Off pump multivessel coronary bypass via sternotomy in safe and effective. Ann Thorac Surg 1998; 66: 1068–72.
Hart JC, Spooner TH, Pym J, Flavin TF, Edgerton JR, Mach MJ, et al. A review of 1582 consecutive Octopus off-pump coronary bypass patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2000; 70: 1017–20.
Bonchek LI, Ullyot DJ. Minimally invasive coronary bypass: a dissenting opinion. Circulation 1998; 98: 495–97.
Angeline GD, Taylor FC, Reeves BC, Ascione R. Early and midterm outcome after off-pump and on-pump surgery in Beating Heart Against cardioplegic Arrest Studies (BHACAS 1 and 2): a pooled analysis of two randomized controlled trials. Lancet 2002; 359: 1194–99.
Van Dijk D, Nierich AP, Jansen EW, Nathoe HM, Suyker WJ, Diephuis JC, et al. Early outcome after off-pump versus on-pump coronary bypass surgery. Results from a randomized study. Circulation 2001; 104: 1761–66.
Puskas JD, Williams WH, Duke PG, Staples JR, Glas KE, Marshall JJ, et al. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting provides complete revascularization with reduced myocardial injury, transfusion requirements and length of stay. A prospective randomized comparison of two hundred unselected patients undergoing off-pump versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003; 125: 797–08.
Plomondon ME, Cleveland JC, Ludwig ST, Grunwald GK, Kiefe CI, Grover FL, et al. Off-pump coronary artery bypass is associated with improved risk-adjusted outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg 2001; 72: 114–49.
Cleveland JC, Shroyer AL, Chen AY, Peterson E, Grover FL. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting decreases risk-adjusted mortality and morbidity. Ann Thorac Surg 2001; 72: 1282–89.
Jones EL, Weintraub WS. The importance of completeness of revascularization during long-term follow-up after coronary artery operations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996; 112: 227–37.
Puskas JD, Thourani VH, Marshell JJ, Dempsey SJ, Steiner MA, Sammons BH, et al. Clinical outcomes angiographic patency and resource utilization in 200 consecutive off-pump coronary bypass patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2001; 71: 1477–84.
Ascione R, Williams S, Lloyd G, Sundaramoorthy T, Pitsis AA, Angeline GD. Reduced postoperative blood loss and transfusion requirement after beating heart coronary operations: a prospective randomized study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001; 121: 689–96.
Cheng W, Denton TA, Fontana GP, Raissi S, Blanche C, Kass RM, et al. Off-pump coronary surgery: Effect on early mortality and stroke. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002; 124: 313–20
Mack MJ, Magovern JA, Shennib H. Arterial graft patency in coronary artery bypass grafting. What do we really know? Ann Thorac Surg 1998; 66: 1055–59.
Mack MJ, Magovern JA, Acutt TA, Landreneau RJ, Tennison DM, Tinnerman EJ, et al. Results of graft patency by immediate angiography in minimally invasive coronary after surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 68: 383–90.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sajja, L.R., Mannam, G., Sompali, S. et al. Does multi-vessel off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting reduce post operative morbidity compared to on-pump CABG?. Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 20, 173–177 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12055-004-0080-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12055-004-0080-1