Abstract
A four-dimensional healthy food product was fabricated, in which 3D printed anthocyanin-potato starch (PS) gel changed its color over time to an attractive color (the 4th dimension). The color changed not only when sprayed the 3D product with different pH solutions but also independently as a response to an internal pH stimulus from another part inside the printed multi-material product. To achieve this, two parts of the gel system were combined, one part was from anthocyanin-PS gel and another part from lemon juice gel. In addition, the color change of anthocyanin-PS gel was also assessed after spraying with different pH solutions at different concentrations of PS and anthocyanin. Color changes were evaluated in terms of lightness (L*), redness (a*), and blueness (b*) using a colorimeter. The color stability of the 4D food product was examined for 24 h after printing. Moreover, a sensory evaluation test was performed to assess the consumer acceptance of the 4D food product. The printed samples sprayed with pH solutions 2, 2.5, 3, and 3.5 showed significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) in color at all PS and anthocyanin concentrations. However, pH samples 4, 4.5, and 5 did not show any visible difference in color after treatment compared to control samples. Furthermore, the color of the 3D printed anthocyanin-PS gel in model (A) gradually changed from purple to red over time during and after the printing process. On the contrary, the 3D printed anthocyanin-PS gel in model (B) did not show any noticeable color change over time after printing. This paper presents a novel application for 4D printing in the food field, which is very important for the food industry to fabricate a healthy product with attractive colors.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Four-dimensional (4D) printing is a recently developed field originating from three-dimensional (3D) printing, displays promising capabilities and more potential applications (Momeni et al. 2017). It was invented and termed by a research group at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) (Tibbits 2014). Several review studies have summarized the various developments and the applications of 4D printing (Xun Khoo et al. 2015; Choi et al. 2015; Momeni et al. 2017; Pei 2014; Pei et al. 2017). According to Pei (2014), 4D printing is “the process of building a physical object using appropriate additive manufacturing technology, laying down successive layers of stimuli-responsive composite or multi-material with varying properties. After being built, the object reacts to stimuli from the natural environment or through human intervention, resulting in a physical or chemical change of state through time.” According to this definition, the color changes of the 3D printed object after printing as a function of time could be considered as 4D printing.
Three aspects must be met for 4D printing to be achieved (Pei 2014). The first is the use of stimulus-responsive materials that are incorporated multi-materials with different properties. It can be defined as materials that would either change their shape or properties between different physical domains in a useful manner under the influence of certain environmental stimuli (Xun Khoo et al. 2015). The second is the stimulus that requires to trigger the alterations of shape/property/functionality of a 4D printed structure. Its selection depends on the requirements of the specific application, which also determines the types of smart materials employed in the 4D printed structures (Momeni et al. 2017). The last aspect to be met is the amount of time for the simulation to occur, and the final result is the change of state of the object.
Three-dimensional food printing provides an engineering solution for customized food design as well as personalized nutrition control and a prototyping tool to facilitate new food product development (Sun et al. 2015). Several studies have been conducted on 3D printing for food products (Azam et al. 2018; Lille et al. 2018; Liu et al. 2018a, b, 2019; Yang et al. 2018a, 2019; Dankar et al. 2018b; Wang et al. 2017a; An et al. 2019; Huang et al. 2019). In contrast, to date, there has been no study conducted on 4D printing in food except for Wang et al. (2017b). They fabricated different shapes of edible films triggered by hydration processes, where they found most of the food gels hydrated and changed volume as a result of absorbing water during hydrophilic interaction inside their molecular or intermolecular structure.
Currently, many researchers suggest printing-customized food with health promotion properties and eliminating or reducing undesirable ingredients and using healthy ingredients such as vitamins, fibers, phytochemicals (anthocyanins, carotenoids, betanidins) and fat or protein-based ingredients (Dankar et al. 2018a; Sun et al. 2018). These will improve the overall appearance, give diverse colors and texture properties to the printed food pieces, and also contribute to consumers’ health and well-being (Sun et al. 2018; Stintzing and Carle 2004). As color is one of the major issues for the food industry, where color mainly defines the esthetic value of food, predetermines consumers’ expectation of flavor and taste and modulates appetite (Bayarri et al. 2001). Also, as the visual appearance of the product is the main factor driving the initial choice for purchase, while subsequent purchases are greatly affected by eating quality. Besides, some studies have been conducted on the effect of the 3D printing on the color of the product (Dankar et al. 2018b; Le Tohic et al. 2018). But to date, there is no study conducted on the color change of printed food products over time after printing to an attractive color as a response to an internal or external stimulus. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to fabricate a 4D food product with health promotion properties, where the 3D printed food product can change its color over time to an attractive color (the 4th dimension) as a response to the external or internal stimuli. This is very important for the food industry or additive manufacturing technology to fabricate a 3D healthy food product with attractive colors and different color intensity that satisfy different consumers’ tastes depending on the prevailing pH stimulus, the printed materials, and the product consumption time after printing.
Therefore, anthocyanin was selected as a smart material because it is able to alter its color as a response to a particular stimulus, such as pH (Kan et al. 2017). Moreover, for its great importance, it has several health-promoting properties, including antioxidant (Tsuda et al. 2003), anti-cancer (Hakimuddin et al. 2004; Umar Lule and Xia 2005; Hou 2003), anti-inflammatory (Wang and Mazza 2002), human nutrition (Stintzing and Carle 2004), anti-cardiovascular disease, and anti-diabetic properties (Graf et al. 2013; Espín et al. 2007). In fact, eating anthocyanin-rich fruits and vegetables may help boost overall health. Where, Graf et al. (2013) reported that anthocyanin-rich juice reduced serum cholesterol as well as decreased the amount of saturated fatty acids in plasma and increased the proportion of polyunsaturated fatty acids. In addition, anthocyanins can repair damaged proteins in the blood vessel walls (Horbowicz et al. 2008). Several review studies have discussed these health benefits of anthocyanin consumption (Burton-Freeman et al. 2016; Duthie et al. 2000).
Besides, anthocyanin ingestion as a food additive material is unlikely to present a safety concern, because there are no reports indicating any adverse health effects with the consumption of anthocyanins at normal dietary intake levels (Kamiloglu et al. 2015). The adverse side effects occur only at very high levels, although there is no complete assessment of anthocyanin toxicity (EFSA 2013). Currently, there are no recommended intake levels for anthocyanin consumption to avoid adverse side effects or for optimal health. However, the average daily intake of anthocyanins in the USA diet is estimated to be as much as 180–255 mg per day (Kuhnau 1976). Therefore, the anthocyanin concentrations (0.1, 0.15, and 0.2%) used in this study were selected on this basis to be less than or in this range per 100 g of the final product.
Moreover, we chose pH as a stimulus because anthocyanin can be found in different chemical forms, resulting in different colors, which depend on the pH of the solution (Brouillard 1982; Bridle and Timberlake 1997; Cooper-Driver 2001; Castañeda-Ovando et al. 2009; Choi et al. 2017; Kan et al. 2017).
This study was divided into two stages: at the first stage, we fabricated a 4D food product, where the 3D printed anthocyanin-potato starch gel can change its color over time when exposed to an external stimulus (pH). In this stage, we first studied the effect of adding different concentrations of potato starch on the quality of the geometrical shape and the intensity of the color change of 3D printed anthocyanin-potato starch (PS) gel after spraying with different pH solutions. Second, the intensity of the color change of 3D printed anthocyanin-PS gel after spraying with different pH solutions at different anthocyanin concentrations were studied. At the second stage, a 3D food product that can change its color independently over time to attractive color without exposing to an external stimulus was printed. To achieve this, two parts of a food product were combined, one part has the smart material (anthocyanin) and another part has the stimulus (pH). Therefore, the lemon juice gel was selected, which contains the stimulus (pH) because it is the lowest food product in pH value, while the second part was from anthocyanin-PS gel, which contains the smart material (anthocyanin).
Materials and Methods
Materials
Anthocyanin purple-red powder 25% extracted from blueberry fruits using UV spectrophotometric detection was purchased from Workshop Moist Reaf, China. It was stored in a refrigerator at 4 °C. PS was purchased from Dongguan Yongyi Foods Co., Ltd. Guangdong, China. The moisture content of PS was 15.72 ± 0.33% (wet basis), 95.5 ± 0.5% purity, with amylose and amylopectin ratios of 24.7 ± 0.2% and 75.3 ± 0.2%, respectively.
Lemon fruits were provided by Jiangsu Laifu Agriculture & Technology Co. Ltd. Sichuan, China. They were stored at 4 °C before use. The fruits were washed, peeled, and juiced. Thirty milliliters of the juice was mixed with sugar (26 g sucrose) and water (160 ml) according to USDA (1962). The pH of the produced lemon juice (2.29 ± 0.01) was measured by a digital pH meter (Starter 3100, Shanghai, China). The total soluble solids (TSS) content (13.5 Brix) was measured using a refractometer (Aipu 0-90, Zhejiang, China).
Preparing pH Solutions
Different pH solutions (pH 2 to 10) were prepared using food-grade materials to ensure safety and accessibility. Citric acid (C6H8O7), trisodium citrate (Na3C6H5O7), sodium bicarbonate (CHNaO3), sodium hydroxide (NaOH), and deionized water (H2O) were used. The pH of the solutions was determined and adjusted by a digital pH meter (Starter 3100, Shanghai, China).
Preparing Anthocyanin-PS Gel
Three concentrations of anthocyanin (0.1, 0.15, and 0.2 g/100 ml water) were prepared and homogenized with different PS concentrations (7.5, 10, 12.5, 15 g/100 ml anthocyanin solution) in a 250 ml glass container. Then, the samples were heated at 53.5 °C using a heating plate coupled with a magnetic stirrer (Hotplate Mixer Digital Display, Model: XR 85-2, China) according to Shiotsubo (1983). They reported that the lowest temperature at which the gelatinization process could occur at 52.5 °C, a temperature which is lower than the so-called gelatinization temperature. The samples were stirred continuously throughout the heating period (10 min). Heating at such low temperature has the advantage of limiting the damage on anthocyanin level. According to Khanal et al. (2010), the heating up to 40 to 60 °C does not affect significantly the total anthocyanin level. The glass beaker holding the homogenous solution was then wrapped with food grade plastic protective film to prevent water loss from the anthocyanin-PS gel. Afterwards, the samples were kept at room temperature to cool down. Finally, the gel was loaded carefully into syringes using a flat spatula to avoid entrapping of air spaces inside the syringe. All these steps were displayed in a systematic diagram as illustrated in Fig. 1.
Preparing Lemon Juice Gel
Lemon juice was firstly homogenized with different PS concentrations (7.5, 10, 12.5, 15 g/100 g juice) in a glass beaker. Then, the samples were heated using the same method for preparing anthocyanin-PS gel. Then, the samples were kept at room temperature to cool down.
3D Models
The models used to print were designed by SketchUp Pro2015 (version 15.0). At the first stage, when we wanted to print one material, the shape of the material to be printed was designed using SketchUp program (three shapes with dimensions 36 × 31 × 4.5 mm, 36 × 31 × 9 mm, and 36 × 31 × 12 mm) and exported as a stereolithography (stl.) file and assigned them to the default extruder in Slic3r. At the second stage, we wanted to print a multi-material object; an object consisting of two parts with dimensions 36 × 31 × 6 mm each was designed. Each part was then exported as a stl. file. Finally, the stl. files of the two parts were merged together and assigned each file to one extruder in Slic3r. The extruder offset and retraction value were preoptimized using two extruders in the printing process.
3D Printer and Printing Process
The 3D food printer used in this study was a syringe type fused deposition modeling (FDM) printer (SHINNOVE-D1, Shinnove Co. Ltd., Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China) as described by Liu et al. (2018c) (Fig. 2). This food printer consists of a dual-nozzle system specially designed for printing food materials. In this study, we used only one extruder at the first stage for printing one material objects and two extruders at the second stage for printing 3D multi-material objects. The printing process was controlled by a specially designed motor. “Slic3r” was used for slicing of the stl. to G-code files for the printing process. The printing parameters used to print were 0.85 mm nozzle diameter (dn), 0.85 mm nozzle height (hn), and 25 mm/s printing speed (s). All these printing parameters were properly adjusted according to pre-tests to get the desired results. Room temperature of 25 °C was applied in the printing process. The products were printed on a thin layer of plastic (1 mm thickness).
Color Measurements
The color of samples was measured using a colorimeter (CR-400, Konica Minolta Co., Japan) that express color in numerical terms along the L*, a*, and b* axes. The coordinate L* is called the lightness. The coordinates a* and b* form a plane perpendicular to the lightness. The coordinate a* is the color redness that defines the deviation from the achromatic point corresponding to lightness, to red when it is positive and to green if negative. Whereas, the coordinate b* is the color blueness that defines the turning to yellow, if positive and to blue, if negative (Messina et al. 2012). After calibration using a white reference plate, each sample was placed on a white plate then L*, a*, and b* values were recorded in triplicate to evaluate color changes after 90 min from spraying with pH solutions or the spontaneous color change over time at (0, 30, 60, and 90 min). All readings were taken at three random locations from the surface of each sample and the average was used to express the color of the individual sample. All samples were prepared in triplicate for every pH-sprayed samples and five replications for spontaneous color change samples.
Sensory Evaluations
Consumer acceptability test based on sensory characteristics of the 3D food product was conducted by a panel of 30 members of food science students, ranging in age from 20 to 35 years old. The samples were coded as follows: A = control (one part of anthocyanin-PS gel without any treatment), B = (one part of anthocyanin-PS gel treated with pH 2), C = (one part of anthocyanin-PS gel treated with pH 2.5), D = (one part of anthocyanin-PS gel treated with pH 3), E = (one part of anthocyanin-PS gel treated with pH 3.5), F = (two parts of anthocyanin-PS gel and PS gel), and G = (two parts of anthocyanin-PS gel and lemon juice gel). The 9-point hedonic scale was used to evaluated the products for their acceptability of color, flavor, taste, texture, and overall acceptability using a score ranging from dislike extremely (1) to like extremely (9) (ISO-4121 2003).
Statistical Analysis
The obtained data from triplicate for every pH-sprayed samples and five replications for spontaneous color change samples were subjected to statistical analysis using SPSS software (SPSS 25.0; IBM SPSS Statistics, Chicago, IL, USA). The analysis of variance (ANOVA) with the application of Duncan’s multiple-range test was conducted in order to ascertain whether there were any significant differences among the mean values of the test samples. Differences of (p ≤ 0.05) were considered to be significant.
Results and Discussion
To study anthocyanin response to color change we prepared anthocyanin-PS gel using different anthocyanin concentrations (0.1, 0.15, 0.2% (w/v)) and 7.5 g/100 ml PS by the method described previously (Fig. 1). Twenty milliliters of anthocyanin-PS gel was put into a small glass beaker. Then, the gel was treated with 1 ml of different pH solutions (pH 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10). The samples were then manually stirred and left until a uniform color change of all the samples were observed and the color change process terminated, indicating chemical equilibrium (Fig. 3).
Figure 3 demonstrates the significant effect of the prevailing pH on anthocyanin color because of its use as a pH indicator. The color of samples displays a huge variety of color variations from red to green after treatment with pH solutions in the range of 2–10. This is because the ionic nature of anthocyanins allows the molecule structure to change according to the prevailing pH, leading to different colors and hues at various pH values (Brouillard 1982). Under various pH conditions, the hydroxyl (OH) and/or methyl ether (O-CH3) groups attached to the carbon rings undergo reversible structural transformations and ionization (Kan et al. 2017). Restructuring the anthocyanin molecule changes its way in light absorption, giving rise to color changes (Cavalcanti et al. 2011; Ananga et al. 2013). Moreover, the color intensity of anthocyanin-PS gel before and after treatment with pH solutions increased with increasing anthocyanin concentrations. This result agrees with Rein (2005), who reported that increasing anthocyanin concentrations lead to increased color intensity by multifold. It was observed that the color changed most significantly upon contacting with the pH solution and then completely changed after several minutes, especially the samples treated with pH 2, which resulted in more significantly rapid and intense color change compared to the other samples. In contrast, samples treated with pH values from 4 to 8 showed less color intensity and relatively slower change. This is consistent with the different ion concentrations in the pH solutions (Kan et al. 2017). Moreover, increasing the pH values lead to a decrease of both the color intensity and the concentration of the flavylium cation, as it is hydrated by nucleophilic attack of water, to the colorless carbinol form (Rein 2005). Thus, pH treatments ranging from 2 to 5 were selected for the present study to obtain a 3D food product with an attractive red color.
The Geometrical Shape and the Intensity of Color Change of 3D Printed Anthocyanin-PS Gel after Spraying with Different pH Solutions at Different Concentrations of Potato Starch
Starch is an excellent binder and widely used as a thickening agent in the food industry. Also, it helps to improve the rheological properties to achieve higher printability for 3DP as well as improves the sensory attributes of the food mixture (Azam et al. 2018). PS has good water retention capacity, transparency, and aging resistance properties (Zhang et al. 2001). Therefore, PS was chosen in this research as a gelling agent. The effect of adding different concentrations of PS (7.5, 10, 12.5, and 15 g/100 ml anthocyanin solution) on the quality of the geometrical shape and the color intensity of 3D printed anthocyanin-PS gel (36 × 31 × 4.5 mm) after spraying uniformly with pH 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, and 5 solutions using a hand sprayer (each sample was sprayed five times (about 1 ml of pH solution)) were studied (Fig. 4). The color values L*, a*, and b* for each sample were measured using a colorimeter immediately after printing (Fig. 5) and after 90 min from spraying with pH solutions (Fig. 6). Similarly, we studied the geometrical shape and the color of anthocyanin-PS gel with increasing the thickness of the printed layer to 9 mm before and after spraying with pH 2.5 solution at different concentrations of PS. The color change in the internal layers by making a vertical section in every sample was also investigated (Fig. 7).
Figure 4 indicates that the color intensity of anthocyanin-PS gel before and after treatment with pH solutions decreased with increasing PS concentration. The color intensity of anthocyanin-PS gel with 7.5 g PS was better than the other PS concentrations. This is consistent with Lewis et al. (1995), who reported that the addition of amylose and amylopectin resulted in significant decreases in anthocyanin color. This is due to the ability of amylose and amylopectin to form inclusion complexes with anthocyanin. These inclusion complexes are increased by increasing the starch concentration, especially the amylose content for its efficiency compared with amylopectin in the formation of these complexes (Yamada et al. 1980; Lewis et al. 1995). pH samples 2, 2.5, 3, and 3.5 showed significant differences in color after treatment compared to control samples in all PS concentrations (7.5, 10, 12.5, and 15 g) (Fig. 4). However, samples treated with pH 4, 4.5, and 5 solutions did not show any visible differences in color compared to control samples (Fig. 4). This is because pH solutions between 4 and 5.5 very little color is left since the colorless carbinol and yellowish chalcone species dominate (Rein 2005).
Figure 7 shows the geometrical shape and the color of 3D printed anthocyanin-PS gel before and after spraying with pH solution 2.5 at different concentrations of PS (7.5, 10, 12.5 and 15 g). The results showed that the geometrical shape of 3D printed anthocyanin-Ps gel with 7.5 g and 10 g were better than 3D printed anthocyanin-Ps gel with 12.5 g and 15 g. Moreover, the color intensity and the surface smoothness of 3D printed anthocyanin-Ps gel were found the best in the 7.5 g samples before (Fig. 7a) and after treatment (Fig. 7b). Also, the color has changed in all layers with almost the same degree as shown from the vertical section in every sample (Fig. 7c). This indicated that the pH solution has permeated all layers and the chemical equilibrium has occurred.
The color values of 3D printed anthocyanin-PS gel before and after spraying with different pH solutions are shown in Fig. 5 and Fig. 6, respectively. Color measurements of the 3D printed anthocyanin-PS gel before treatment with pH solutions (Fig. 5) showed that the color values a* and b* decreased with increasing PS concentration. For example, the results revealed that increasing the PS concentrations from 7.5 to 15 g decreased a* value from 7.65 to 4.44 and b* value from 5.83 to 1.94 as illustrated in Fig. 5.
PS concentration significantly affected the color of 3D printed anthocyanin-PS gel. As indicated in Fig. 5, there was a significant difference among 7.5 g, 10 g, and 12.5 g or 15 g in L* and a* values (P ≤ 0.05). Furthermore, there was a significant difference among 7.5 g, 10 g, 12.5 g, and 15 g samples in b* values (P ≤ 0.05). However, there was no significant difference between 12.5 g and 15 g in L* and a* values (P ≤ 0.05).
Figure 6 indicates the color values of 3D printed anthocyanin-PS gel after spraying with different pH solutions (pH 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, and 5) at different concentrations of PS (7.5, 10, 12.5, and 15 g). Compared to the control samples, samples treated with pH 2, 2.5, 3, and 3.5 showed highly significant differences (P ≤ 0.05) in color values after treatment in all PS concentrations (7.5, 10, 12.5, and 15 g). However, samples treated with pH 4, 4.5, and 5 showed only small differences in color values after treatment among each other and the control samples (Fig. 6). The color values a* and b* decreased, while L* value increased with the increase in pH values from 2 to 5. This is because at low pH values all the anthocyanin molecules are in flavylium form (red color), and with increasing pH values, it leads to a decrease in the concentration of the flavylium cation resulting in a colorless carbinol pseudo base form, which is colorless (Castañeda-Ovando et al. 2009; Rein 2005). Moreover, the results revealed that increasing the pH value from 2 to 5 decreased a* values as well as b* values and increased L* values at all PS concentrations (Fig. 6).
The Intensity of Color Change of 3D Printed Anthocyanin-PS Gel after Spraying with Different pH Solutions at Different Anthocyanin Concentrations
There is no doubt that increasing anthocyanin concentration will increase the color intensity. The present study had investigated the significance and impact of different concentrations of anthocyanin (0.1, 0.15, and 0.2%) on the final color of 3D printed anthocyanin-PS gel before (Fig. 8) and after treatment with pH solutions (pH 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, and 5) (Fig. 9 and Fig. 10). As expected, the results showed that increased anthocyanin concentration led to the increase of color intensity of 3D printed anthocyanin-PS gel. However, the color difference between anthocyanin concentration of 0.15% and 0.2% was not noticeable. Moreover, in all anthocyanin concentrations (0.1, 0.15, and 0.2%), pH samples 2, 2.5, 3, and 3.5 showed distinct differences in color after treatment compared to control samples. However, pH samples 4, 4.5, and 5 did not show any visible differences in color after treatment compared to control samples (Fig. 9). As mentioned above, this is because in pH values between 4 and 5.5 very little color is left since the colorless carbinol and yellowish chalcone species dominate (Rein 2005).
Figure 8 presents the mean color values of 3D printed anthocyanin-PS gel before treatment with pH solutions. The results indicated that the color values a* and b* significantly increased and L* values significantly decreased with the increase of anthocyanin concentration. Similarly, Fig. 10 reveals the same trend after spraying with different pH solutions. This is because the increase of anthocyanin concentration in the product leads to increase the color intensity before and after treatment.
At the second stage, we aimed to print a 3D food product that can change its color independently over time to attractive color without exposing to any external stimuli. To achieve this, two parts of a food product were combined, one part has the smart material (anthocyanin) and the other part has the pH stimulus. Therefore, we chose lemon juice gel, which contains the stimulus (pH) as the first part because it is the lowest food product in pH value, while the second part was from anthocyanin-PS gel, which contains the smart material (anthocyanin). Firstly, the suitable concentration of PS for printing 3D lemon juice gel was investigated to obtain a good 3D printing behavior. As shown in Fig. 11, the geometrical shape of 3D printed lemon juice gel using PS concentration 10 g/100 g was better than the other concentrations at two infill percentages (40, 60%) (Fig. 11). Therefore, the formulation with 10 g PS concentration was used as the first part (lemon juice gel) of the final product.
Furthermore, 7.5 g PS concentration was used in the second part (anthocyanin-PS gel) for several reasons in addition to its good geometrical shape: firstly, it has more intense color and smooth surface making it more attractive compared to the other concentrations. Secondly, the mobility of water molecules is higher compared to other concentrations. This may be helpful in facilitating the chemical interaction between the two parts and accelerate the color change of the final product. This is mainly due to the increase in starch concentration leads to an increase in the number of starch molecules per unit volume, and increase the probability of intermolecular hydrogen bonding, leading to a more compact network structure, thus the strength of the gel increased (Nunes et al. 2006; Yang et al. 2018b). This strong gel significantly restricts the mobility of water molecules in the gel system (Yang et al. 2018b; Ozel et al. 2017). Thirdly, to reduce the starch concentration in the whole product so that other health substances can be added.
Two models (A) and (B) of 3D printed food product were created. Model (A) consists of two parts, the first part of lemon juice gel and the second part of anthocyanin-PS gel. Model (B) on the other hand, consists of two parts, the first part of PS gel only without lemon juice and the second part of anthocyanin-PS gel. These two models were used to illustrate the difference between the color change in both models due to the difference in pH values of lemon juice gel compared to PS gel only.
Figure 12 shows the spontaneous color change of 3D printed model (A) compared to model (B) over time after printing (at 0, 30, 60, and 90 min) at different anthocyanin concentrations (0.1, 0.15, and 0.2%). We also performed a vertical section investigation in some samples directly after printing to follow the spontaneous color change over time (Fig. 13). However, noteworthy, it was difficult to make the section without making shape deformation as a result of the lower consistency of the gel directly after printing.
It can be seen that the color of 3D printed anthocyanin-PS gel in model (A) gradually changed from purple to red over time during and after the printing process at all anthocyanin concentrations (0.1, 0.15, and 0.2%) (Fig. 12). On the contrary, the 3D printed anthocyanin-PS gel in model (B) did not show any noticeable color change over time after printing (Fig. 12). This result was attributed to the difference in pH value between lemon juice gel and PS gel as explained in (Fig. 14).
When printing lemon juice gel as a bottom part with anthocyanin-PS gel as an upper part in the model (A), pH values of lemon juice gel and anthocyanin-PS gel became 2.58 and 2.74, respectively after 90 min from the printing process. On the other hand, when printing PS gel as a bottom part with anthocyanin-PS gel as an upper part in the model (B), pH values of PS gel and anthocyanin-PS gel became 5.59 and 5.11, respectively, after 90 min from printing process with a small difference compared to pH values before printing process (Fig. 14).
In model (A), the pH value of the upper part (anthocyanin-PS gel) significantly decreased from pH 5.13 before printing to 2.74 after 90 min from printing as a result of the low pH value of lemon juice gel as a bottom part (pH 2.55) (the pH value of anthocyanin-PS gel and lemon juice gel was determined after separating them from each other using a pH meter). This is because during the printing process of the upper part (anthocyanin-PS gel) and once the first layer of this part is printed on the bottom part (lemon juice gel), the diffusion of hydrogen ions occurs according to Fick’s first law from regions of high concentration (lemon juice gel) to regions of low concentration (anthocyanin-PS gel) due to the greater pH difference between lemon juice gel and anthocyanin-PS gel. This diffusion of hydrogen ions continues over time after printing until the equilibrium state achieved, which reduces the pH value of anthocyanin-PS gel to become close to the pH value of lemon juice gel, while in model (B), pH value of the upper part (anthocyanin-PS gel) was close to the bottom part (PS gel) so its value remained the same (pH 5.11) as before printing process (Fig. 14). As a result, there is a change in the color of the upper part with a pH value of less than 3.5 in model (A), but there is no change in the color of the upper part in model (B). Again, because changes in pH values cause reversible structural transformations in anthocyanin molecules, which leads to change its color as discussed above (Ananga et al. 2013; Kan et al. 2017). Moreover, this also because anthocyanins have little color at pH values higher than 3.5 as discussed above (Bridle and Timberlake 1997; Rein 2005).
Figure 15 presents the color values of the upper part (anthocyanin-PS gel) of the 3D printed model (A) and (B) over time after printing (at 0, 30, 60, and 90 min) at different concentrations of anthocyanin (A = 0.1%, B = 0.15%, and C = 0.2% (w/v)). Generally, the color values of the upper part of the 3D printed model (A) increased significantly over time after printing. Moreover, there are small differences in color values L* of model (A) and (B) at all anthocyanin concentrations (0.1, 0.15, and 0.2%). However, there are no significant differences in a* and b* of model B over time after printing at all anthocyanin concentrations.
Figure 16 shows the effect of different formulas and models on the color of the 3D product after printing directly and after 90 min from printing at different anthocyanin concentration. As discussed in detail above, the color of 3D printed anthocyanin-PS gel changed from purple to red and the color values a* and b* increased and L* values decreased with the increase of anthocyanin concentration after 90 min from spraying with pH 2.5 (Fig. 16a). Moreover, the color of 3D printed anthocyanin-PS gel in model (A) gradually changed from purple to red independently as a response to an internal pH stimulus from the bottom part (lemon juice gel) at all anthocyanin concentrations (Fig. 16b). In contrast, the 3D printed anthocyanin-PS gel in model (B) did not show any noticeable color change after 90 min from printing (Fig. 16c).
The Color Stability of the 3D Product
The 3D product was manufactured without the addition of preservatives for the immediate consumption within 24 h from printing at ambient temperature. This period has been determined to ensure the safety of product consumption in this period because the fungi began to appear on the surface of the product from the end of the second day, which means that the product began spoilage stages. Therefore, we examined the color stability of the 3D printed model (A) over storage at ambient temperature for 24 h. After printing, the product was wrapped by food grade plastic protective film to prevent the water loss during the storage. As shown in Fig. 17, the color of the product remained stable even after storage for 24 h at room temperature; moreover, it was improved. This improvement was due to the decrease of pH value of anthocyanin-PS gel over time to be equal to the pH value of lemon juice gel because of the continued diffusion of hydrogen ions till chemical balance as discussed above. The color stability was attributed to the fact that anthocyanin color is most stable at low pH values (Hubbermann et al. 2006). This result agrees with Clydesdale et al. (1979) who had reported that the stability of grape and cranberry anthocyanins for gelatin dessert after storage for 1 day of sunlight and 1 week of refrigeration was excellent. This also means that there was no degradation of anthocyanins in the product through this storage period; otherwise, the color intensity of the product would be reduced or even the occurrence of browning (Bridle and Timberlake 1997; Muche et al. 2018). In addition, the loss of anthocyanins is most significantly characterized by a reduction of redness (Hubbermann 2005).
Sensory Evaluation of the 3D Printed Samples
Table 1 shows the average sensory scores for each attribute evaluated. Based on color, sample B (one part of anthocyanin-PS gel treated with pH 2) had the highest score for color followed by sample G (two parts of anthocyanin-PS gel and lemon juice gel). However, there was no significant difference between them. Furthermore, no significant difference was found among all samples in terms of texture attribute. Sample B gave the least score in taste as it was very sour. Finally, the flavor, taste, texture, and overall acceptability of sample G were evaluated as being best compared to all the samples. The improvement in all the attributes of this sample is due to the addition of lemon juice gel.
Therefore, we can say that adding the lemon juice gel as a bottom part was of great importance besides its work as a source of pH stimulus, where it gave a good flavor and taste and high nutritional value to the final product making it more acceptable compared to using one part of 3D printed anthocyanin-PS gel then sprayed it with pH solution.
Conclusions
This study has achieved an evolution in 3D food printing to 4D food printing, where a four-dimensional food product with health promotion properties was fabricated by printing a 3D food product which changed its color over time to an attractive color when exposed to an external stimulus or an internal stimulus from another part inside the product. Moreover, we studied the effect of adding different concentrations of PS (7.5, 10, 12.5, and 15 g) and anthocyanin (0.1%, 0.15%, and 0.2%) on the color intensity of 3D printed anthocyanin-PS gel after spraying with different pH solutions (pH 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, and 5). The study has also revealed that the color intensity of 3D printed anthocyanin-PS gel before and after treatment with pH solutions decreased with the increasing of PS concentration. On the other hand, as expected, the color intensity of 3D printed anthocyanin-PS gel before and after treatment with pH solutions increased when anthocyanin concentration increased. The results also indicated that pH samples 2, 2.5, 3, and 3.5 showed significant differences in color after treatment compared to control samples, regardless of the concentrations of PS and anthocyanin. However, pH samples 4, 4.5, and 5 did not show any visible differences in color after treatment compared to control samples. The information obtained from this study is very important for the food industry or additive manufacturing technology to fabricate a 3D healthy food product with attractive colors that satisfy consumer acceptance.
References
An, Y. J., Guo, C. F., Zhang, M., & Zhong, Z. P. (2019). Investigation on characteristics of 3D printing using Nostoc sphaeroides biomass. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 99(2), 639–646.
Ananga, A., Georgiev, V., Ochieng, J., Phills, B., & Tsolova, V. (2013). Production of anthocyanins in grape cell cultures: A potential source of raw material for pharmaceutical, food, and cosmetic industries. In The Mediterranean genetic code-grapevine and olive. London: InTech.
Azam, S. M., Zhang, M., Mujumdar, A. S., & Yang, C. (2018). Study on 3D printing of orange concentrate and material characteristics. Journal of Food Process Engineering., 41(5), e12689.
Bayarri, S., Calvo, C., Costell, E., & Durán, L. (2001). Influence of color on perception of sweetness and fruit flavor of fruit drinks. Food Science and Technology International., 7(5), 399–404.
Bridle, P., & Timberlake, C. (1997). Anthocyanins as natural food colours—Selected aspects. Food Chemistry, 58(1–2), 103–109.
Brouillard, R. (1982). Chemical structure of anthocyanins. New York: Academic Press Inc..
Burton-Freeman, B., Sandhu, A., & Edirisinghe, I. (2016). Chapter 35 - anthocyanins. In R. C. Gupta (Ed.), Nutraceuticals (pp. 489–500). Boston: Academic.
Castañeda-Ovando, A., Pacheco-Hernández, M. L., Páez-Hernández, M. E., Rodríguez, J. A., & Galán-Vidal, C. A. (2009). Chemical studies of anthocyanins: A review. Food Chemistry., 113(4), 859–871.
Cavalcanti, R. N., Santos, D. T., & Meireles, M. A. A. (2011). Non-thermal stabilization mechanisms of anthocyanins in model and food systems—An overview. Food Research International., 44(2), 499–509.
Choi, J., Kwon, O.-C., Jo, W., Lee, H. J., & Moon, M.-W. (2015). 4D printing technology: A review. 3D. Printing and Additive Manufacturing., 2(4), 159–167.
Choi, I., Lee, J. Y., Lacroix, M., & Han, J. (2017). Intelligent pH indicator film composed of agar/potato starch and anthocyanin extracts from purple sweet potato. Food Chemistry., 218, 122–128.
Clydesdale, F. M., Main, J. H., & Francis, F. J. (1979). Roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) anthocyanins as colorants for beverages and gelatin desserts. Journal of Food Protection., 42(3), 204–207.
Cooper-Driver, G. A. (2001). Contributions of Jeffrey Harborne and co-workers to the study of anthocyanins. Phytochemistry., 56(3), 229–236.
Dankar, I., Haddarah, A., Omar, F. E. L., Sepulcre, F., & Pujolà, M. (2018a). 3D printing technology: The new era for food customization and elaboration. Trends in Food Science & Technology., 75, 231–242.
Dankar, I., Pujolà, M., El Omar, F., Sepulcre, F., & Haddarah, A. (2018b). Impact of mechanical and microstructural properties of potato puree-food additive complexes on extrusion-based 3D printing. Food and bioprocess technology., 11(11), 2021–2031.
Duthie, G. G., Duthie, S. J., & Kyle, J. A. (2000). Plant polyphenols in cancer and heart disease: Implications as nutritional antioxidants. Nutrition Research Reviews, 13(1), 79–106.
EFSA. (2013). Scientific opinion on the re-evaluation of anthocyanins (E 163) as a food additive. EFSA Journal., 11(4), 3145.
Espín, J. C., García-Conesa, M. T., & Tomás-Barberán, F. A. (2007). Nutraceuticals: Facts and fiction. Phytochemistry., 68(22), 2986–3008.
Graf, D., Seifert, S., Jaudszus, A., Bub, A., & Watzl, B. (2013). Anthocyanin-rich juice lowers serum cholesterol, leptin, and resistin and improves plasma fatty acid composition in fischer rats. PLoS One, 8(6), e66690.
Hakimuddin, F., Paliyath, G., & Meckling, K. (2004). Selective cytotoxicity of a red grape wine flavonoid fraction against MCF-7 cells. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 85(1), 65–79.
Horbowicz, M., Kosson, R., Grzesiuk, A., & Dębski, H. (2008). Anthocyanins of fruits and vegetables - their occurrence, analysis and role in human nutrition. In Vegetable crops research bulletin (Vol. 68, p. 5).
Hou, D. X. (2003). Potential mechanisms of cancer chemoprevention by anthocyanins. Current Molecular Medicine, 3(2), 149–159.
Huang, M.-S., Zhang, M., & Bhandari, B. (2019). Assessing the 3D printing precision and texture properties of brown rice induced by infill levels and printing variables. Food and Bioprocess Technology, 1–12.
Hubbermann, E. M. (2005). Functional properties of anthocyanin concentrates and the influence of physicochemical parameters and food additives on the color and stability of isolated anthocyanins in food matrices. Der Andere Verlag.
Hubbermann, E. M., Heins, A., Stöckmann, H., & Schwarz, K. (2006). Influence of acids, salt, sugars and hydrocolloids on the colour stability of anthocyanin rich black currant and elderberry concentrates. European Food Research and Technology., 223(1), 83–90.
ISO-4121. (2003). Sensory analysis. In Guidelines for the Use of Quantitative Response Scales. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
Kamiloglu, S., Capanoglu, E., Grootaert, C., & Van Camp, J. (2015). Anthocyanin absorption and metabolism by human intestinal Caco-2 cells—A review. International journal of molecular sciences., 16(9), 21555–21574.
Kan, V., Vargo, E., Machover, N., Ishii, H., Pan, S., Chen, W., & Kakehi, Y. (2017). Organic primitives: Synthesis and design of pH-reactive materials using molecular I/O for sensing, actuation, and interaction. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 989–1000). Denver: ACM.
Khanal, R. C., Howard, L. R., & Prior, R. L. (2010). Effect of heating on the stability of grape and blueberry pomace procyanidins and total anthocyanins. Food Research International., 43(5), 1464–1469.
Kuhnau, J. (1976). The flavonoids. A class of semi-essential food components: their role in human nutrition. World Review of Nutrition and Dietetics, 24, 117–191.
Le Tohic, C., O'Sullivan, J. J., Drapala, K. P., Chartrin, V., Chan, T., Morrison, A. P., Kerry, J. P., & Kelly, A. L. (2018). Effect of 3D printing on the structure and textural properties of processed cheese. Journal of Food Engineering., 220, 56–64.
Lewis, C. E., Walker, J. R. L., & Lancaster, J. E. (1995). Effect of polysaccharides on the colour of anthocyanins. Food Chemistry., 54(3), 315–319.
Lille, M., Nurmela, A., Nordlund, E., Metsä-Kortelainen, S., & Sozer, N. (2018). Applicability of protein and fiber-rich food materials in extrusion-based 3D printing. Journal of Food Engineering., 220, 20–27.
Liu, Z., Zhang, M., & Bhandari, B. (2018a). Effect of gums on the rheological, microstructural and extrusion printing characteristics of mashed potatoes. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules., 117, 1179–1187.
Liu, Z., Zhang, M., Bhandari, B., & Yang, C. (2018b). Impact of rheological properties of mashed potatoes on 3D printing. Journal of Food Engineering., 220, 76–82.
Liu, Z., Zhang, M., & Yang, C.-h. (2018c). Dual extrusion 3D printing of mashed potatoes/strawberry juice gel. LWT., 96, 589–596.
Liu, L., Meng, Y., Dai, X., Chen, K., & Zhu, Y. (2019). 3D printing complex egg white protein objects: Properties and optimization. Food and Bioprocess Technology., 12(2), 267–279.
Messina, V., Domínguez, P. G., Sancho, A. M., Walsöe de Reca, N., Carrari, F., & Grigioni, G. (2012). Tomato quality during short-term storage assessed by colour and electronic nose. International Journal of Electrochemistry, 2012, 1–7.
Momeni, F., Hassani, N. S. M. M., Liu, X., & Ni, J. (2017). A review of 4D printing. Materials & Design, 122(Supplement C), 42–79.
Muche, B. M., Speers, R. A., & Rupasinghe, H. P. V. (2018). Storage temperature impacts on anthocyanins degradation, color changes and haze development in juice of “merlot” and “ruby” grapes (Vitis vinifera). Frontiers in Nutrition., 5(100).
Nunes, C., Raymundo, A., & Sousa, I. (2006). Rheological behaviour and microstructure of pea protein/k-carrageenan/starch gels with different setting conditions. Food Hydrocoll Food Hydrocolloids., 20(1).
Ozel, B., Uguz, S. S., Kilercioglu, M., Grunin, L., & Oztop, M. H. (2017). Effect of different polysaccharides on swelling of composite whey protein hydrogels: A low field (LF) NMR relaxometry study. Journal of Food Process Engineering., 40(3), e12465.
Pei, E. (2014). 4D printing: Dawn of an emerging technology cycle. Assembly Automation., 34(4), 310–314.
Pei, E., Loh, G. H., Harrison, D., Almeida, H. A., Monzón Verona, M. D., & Paz, R. (2017). A study of 4D printing and functionally graded additive manufacturing. Assembly Automation., 37(2), 147–153.
Rein, M. (2005). Copigmentation reactions and color stability of berry anthocyanins. Helsinki: University of Helsinki, Department of Applied Chemistry and Microbiology.
Shiotsubo, T. (1983). Starch gelatinization at different temperatures as measured by enzymic digestion method. Agricultural and Biological Chemistry., 47(11), 2421–2425.
Stintzing, F. C., & Carle, R. (2004). Functional properties of anthocyanins and betalains in plants, food, and in human nutrition. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 15(1), 19–38.
Sun, J., Zhou, W., Huang, D., Fuh, J. Y., & Hong, G. S. (2015). An overview of 3D printing technologies for food fabrication. Food and Bioprocess Technology, 8(8), 1605–1615.
Sun, J., Zhou, W., Yan, L., Huang, D., & Lin, L.-y. (2018). Extrusion-based food printing for digitalized food design and nutrition control. Journal of Food Engineering, 220, 1–11.
Tibbits, S. (2014). 4D printing: Multi-material shape change. Architectural Design, 84(1), 116–121.
Tsuda, T., Horio, F., Uchida, K., Aoki, H., & Osawa, T. (2003). Dietary cyanidin 3-O-beta-D-glucoside-rich purple corn color prevents obesity and ameliorates hyperglycemia in mice. The Journal of Nutrition, 133(7), 2125–2130.
Umar Lule, S., & Xia, W. (2005). Food phenolics, pros and cons: A review. Food Reviews International, 21(4), 367–388.
USDA (1962). United States Standards for Grades of Canned Lemon Juice. Federal Register (27 FR 10315). 9. Available online: https://www.ams.usda.gov/sites/default/files/media/Canned_Lemon_Juice_Standard%5B1%5D_0.pdf
Wang, J., & Mazza, G. (2002). Effects of anthocyanins and other phenolic compounds on the production of tumor necrosis factor alpha in LPS/IFN-gamma-activated RAW 264.7 macrophages. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 50(15), 4183–4189.
Wang L., Zhang M., Bhandari B. & Yang, C. (2017a). Investigation on fish surimi gel as promising food material for 3D printing. Journal of Food Engineering, 220, 101–108.
Wang, W., Yao, L., Zhang, T., Cheng, C.-Y., Levine, D., & Ishii, H. (2017b). Transformative appetite: Shape-changing food transforms from 2D to 3D by water interaction through cooking. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 6123–6132). Denver: ACM.
Xun Khoo, Z., Ee Mei Teoh, J., Liu, Y., Kai Chua, C., Yang, S., An, J., Leong, K. F., & Yeong, W. Y. (2015). 3D printing of smart materials: A review on recent progresses in 4D printing. Virtual and Physical Prototyping, 10, 103–122.
Yamada, T., Komiya, T., & Akaki, M. (1980). Formation of an inclusion complex of anthocyanin with cyclodextrin. Agricultural and Biological Chemistry., 44(6), 1411–1413.
Yang, F., Zhang, M., Bhandari, B., & Liu, Y. (2018a). Investigation on lemon juice gel as food material for 3D printing and optimization of printing parameters. LWT-Food Science and Technology., 87, 67–76.
Yang, F., Zhang, M., Prakash, S., & Liu, Y. (2018b). Physical properties of 3D printed baking dough as affected by different compositions. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies., 49, 202–210.
Yang, F., Guo, C., Zhang, M., Bhandari, B., & Liu, Y. (2019). Improving 3D printing process of lemon juice gel based on fluid flow numerical simulation. LWT., 102, 89–99.
Zhang, B., Zhang, Y., Yang, L., & Chen, J. (2001). Study on the crystalline structure and property of corn, cassava and potato starch granules. Food Science, 22(2), 11–13.
Acknowledgments
This study is financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation Program of China (No. 3187101297), China State Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology Innovation Project (Contract No. SKLF-ZZA-201706), National First-class Discipline Program of Food Science and Technology (No. JUFSTR20180205), and Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory Project of Advanced Food Manufacturing Equipment and Technology (No. FMZ201803).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ghazal, A.F., Zhang, M. & Liu, Z. Spontaneous Color Change of 3D Printed Healthy Food Product over Time after Printing as a Novel Application for 4D Food Printing. Food Bioprocess Technol 12, 1627–1645 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-019-02327-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-019-02327-6