Abstract
Purpose of Review
The purpose of this review is to examine the impact of pupillometer assessment on care and research of patients with neurological injury.
Recent Findings
Recent studies demonstrate that automated pupillometry outperforms manual penlight pupil examination in neurocritical care populations. Further research has identified specific changes in the pupillary light reflex associated with pathologic conditions, and pupillometry has been used to successfully identify early changes in neurologic function, intracranial pressure, treatment response to osmotherapy, and prognosis after cardiac arrest.
Summary
Automated pupillometry is being increasingly adopted as a routine part of the neurologic examination, supported by a growing body of literature demonstrating its reliability, accuracy, and ease of use. Automated pupillometry allows rapid, non-invasive, reliable, and quantifiable assessment of pupillary function which may allow rapid diagnosis of intracranial pathology that affects clinical decision making.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The neurological exam remains the most vital and relevant bedside diagnostic evaluation of neurological function that is available to the clinician. Examination of the pupillary light reflex (PLR) has long been a standard element of this exam for patients with known or suspected neurologic injury. The standard pupil examination most commonly involves visual assessment of pupil size, shape, symmetry, and pupillary light reflex [1]. Modern pupilometers provide accurate and reliable evaluation of various aspects of the PLR at precision levels that were heretofore unobtainable [2•, 3,4,5]. While automated pupillometry has not replaced any portion of the neurological exam, it has changed the accuracy and reliability of the PLR assessment. Therefore, the purpose of this review is to examine the impact of pupillometer assessment on care and research of the patient with neurological injury.
Neuromonitoring is essential for detecting changes in cerebral function to identify pathology and support interventions to prevent impending secondary brain injury [6]. PLR deterioration is a strong predictor of outcome after acquired brain injury [7, 8•, 9]. The importance of accurate, reliable, and valid data is not disputed, but the methods and tools for neuromonitoring are debated [10]. In the past 5 years, there has been a substantial increase in data supporting the utility, reliability, and predictive value of PLR data from automated pupillometry (Table 1) [3, 9, 11, 13, 14, 16, 20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29].
The Pupillary Light Reflex
Pupil “correctopia” was identified in 1907 [30]. Abnormal size and shape were later associated with changes in intracranial pressure (ICP) [31,32,33]. Under normal conditions with the PLR intact, light delivered to the entire pupil will produce a decrease in pupil size [34]. The pupillary response is under direct control of the autonomic nervous system, and maximum constriction velocity and relative constriction amplitude are felt to be effective means for detecting parasympathetic dysfunction [35, 36]. The dynamics of the PLR follow a consistent pattern involving 4 phases which can be mapped out based on changes in size (diameter) over time (seconds). These phases are response latency, maximum constriction, pupillary escape, and recovery [36]. Automated pupillometry provides measured values for three of these phases: latency, constriction velocity (CV), and dilation velocity (Fig. 1).
Latency is measured in milliseconds and describes the delay in pupil constriction following the application of the light stimulus [37]. The latency period, which may be shortened by higher intensity light stimulus, is due to delay in iris smooth muscle contraction with minimal effect from innervation pathways [38]. Latency is followed by constriction of the pupil. Constriction is measured in millimeters per second (mm/s) and reported or analyzed as CV, and also as maximum CV. The maximum CV is seen during initial constriction, and the velocity diminishes as the minimum pupillary diameter is reached [11•]. Following peak constriction, the pupil quickly escapes to a partially constricted state before returning to its initial size [36]. The recovery phase occurs when the light stimulus is removed and is measured in mm/s and reported as the dilation velocity (DV) [37]. Post-illumination recovery can be sustained for up to 3 min depending on properties of the light and retina [36].
Sympathetic and parasympathetic pathways help regulate the PLR. An arousing stimulus, whether noxious or loud, applied to an awake subject dilates the pupil by activating the sympathetic radial muscle [39]. The pupil dilation reflex (PDR) following a stimulus occurs through integrated processes driven by sympathetic neurons. The parasympathetic innervation to the pupil sphincter is suppressed by supranuclear inhibition (central sympathetic neurons primarily in the reticular activating system which inhibit pre-ganglionic parasympathetic neurons at the Edinger-Westphal nucleus) resulting in relaxation and pupillary dilation. Additional dilator muscle activation occurs via the α1-adrenergic sympathetic pathway. The mechanics of these pathways are mediated by both acetylcholine at synaptic junctions, and dilator muscle response to noradrenaline [36].
Pupillometry Basics
The amplitude or magnitude of the contraction, the CV, and the DV depend on the intensity and duration of the applied stimulus [40]. Whereas traditional assessment of the PLR is dependent on clinician assessment skills and light source (intensity and duration), pupillometry capitalizes on technological advancements in high-speed camera and computing technology [41]. The modern pupillometer is a handheld device that performs quantitative, reproducible, precise measurements [2•, 12, 42].
Solid-state microchips sensitive to infrared light allow continuous measurement of the pupil without simultaneously altering the pupil size and movement. A light-emitting diode infrared light is applied toward the pupil, and a sensor detects the reflected infrared light from the iris. The pupil is a blank circle in the middle of the reflected image, and the computer calculates the area of the pupil. This diameter is measured rapidly and repeatedly (every 30 ms). This generates not only the size of the pupil over several seconds but also the fluctuations in pupil size.
The Neuroptics NPi-200 is currently the only handheld pupillometer marketed in the USA. This device provides measured values for pupil size a baseline and maximum constriction, latency, CV, and DV, and a derived (proprietary formula) for the Neurological Pupil Index (NPi) [37]. While criticized for not having full control of ambient light, the very gradual nature of dark adaptation would not be feasible to incorporate into the neurological examination, with or without pupillometry [43]. Research into pupillometry is challenging the traditional evaluation of a normally reactive pupil. New data now demonstrate that a pupil can be briskly reactive, but abnormal (e.g., a 6-mm pupil that only partially constricts to 5 mm) [11•].
Primary Neurological Conditions
Pathologic changes in the PLR have been associated with clinical outcomes in a wide variety of neurological conditions [29]. Park et al. demonstrated a detectable difference in admission NPi values with patients with poor 1-month neurological outcomes (GOS 1–3) for all comers with acute brain injury due to subarachnoid hemorrhage, TBI, cerebral infarction, or intracerebral hemorrhage using an NPi cutoff for 3.4 with a specificity of 84.2% and sensitivity of 86% for a “poor” vs. “favorable” outcome [44]. Pupillary changes are often a harbinger of secondary brain injury, cerebral edema, hydrocephalus, intracranial shift, and raised ICP [6, 7, 13•, 24, 45,46,47]. A plethora of data generated within the field of ophthalmology predating the advent of handheld pupillometry documents the effect of intrinsic (preexisting) eye pathology influences pupil size and light reflex. Preexisting optic neuropathies, Argyll Robertson pupil, asymmetric glaucoma, and retinal disease may impact both manual and automated pupil examination, and these will not be addressed in this review. It is important to emphasize documentation of accurate baseline examination and consider intrinsic eye pathology in the differential for baseline abnormalities whether or not pupillometry has been employed.
Traumatic Brain Injury
A 2003 study [33] launched research examining pupillometry in acute traumatic brain injury (TBI). In patients with acute traumatic epidural hematoma and Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) < 8, anisocoria (pupillary size difference of > 2 mm) was present in 67% of patients and reducing the surgery interval to less than 90 min was associated with a better outcome [48]. Whereas TBI patients with a GCS = 3 and fixed and dilated pupils had no reasonable chance for survival, a cohort of patients with GCS = 3 whose pupils were not fixed and dilated survived their injury [49]. DV has been noted to be altered even in mild TBI and concussion [47].
Elevated ICP is a common sequela of TBI, and a growing body of evidence supports that elevated ICP is associated with decreased NPi [13•, 22, 23, 50]. Patients with elevated ICP were found to have improvement in NPi values after osmotic therapy (20% mannitol or 23.4% saline), indicating that pupillometry has potential use as a noninvasive tool to assess the efficacy of osmotic therapy [17•]. The use of pupillometry as a non-invasive means to detect elevated ICP is further supported by Soeken et al. [51] in a study of idiopathic intracranial hypertension.
Oculomotor Nerve Palsy and Horner’s Syndrome
Pupillometry has also been used to differentiate compressive and ischemic third nerve palsy. Reduced CV was found to be the most specific parameter for detecting non-ischemic third nerve palsy. For diagnosing compressive third nerve palsy, an inter-eye difference of > 0.45 mm in minimum pupil diameter or < − 7.5% constriction ratio had a sensitivity and specificity of 95% and 88% respectively [25]. Aoun et al. [52] reported a case in which abnormal NPi values preceded subjective assessment of third nerve palsy by 12-h. Pupillometric assessment of inter-eye differences of the maximum pupil diameter or the time taken by the pupil to recover to 75% of maximum diameter has been shown to have a sensitivity of 94.7% and specificity of 93.3% in the diagnosis of Horner’s syndrome. This is comparable to the diagnostic accuracy of the apraclonidine test [53].
Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Stroke
Assessment of the PLR is equally important in stroke. Osman et al. [15] studied the relationship between intracranial midline shift and PLR indices in a retrospective study of 136 patients with an acute stroke (70% ischemic, 30% hemorrhagic). There was a significant correlation between midline shift and NPi, CV, and pupil asymmetry, but not pupil size [15]. However, pupillary size and DV were correlated in controls and patients with left hemispheric infarctions but not in patients with right hemispheric infarctions [54].
Pathological NPi values were more commonly seen in patients with high-grade subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) where the World Federation of Neurological Surgeons (WFNS) grade was > 3 compared with less severe SAH (WFNS grade 1–3) [16•]. Following subarachnoid hemorrhage, there is a significant correlation between the standard deviations for NPi, pupil size, CV, and DV and the discharge mRS score [8•]. There was a significant association between delayed cerebral ischemia and an abnormal decrease in NPi, but no association between NPi and sonographic vasospasm and the NPI preceded clinically detectable neurological changes by > 8 h in 2/3 of the cohort [14].
Seizure
Pupillometry research in seizure is limited. In a series of 89 electroconvulsive therapy sessions, patients’ pupillary constrictions were significantly smaller (greater change in size) in the group with an adequate seizure when compared with the inadequate group [55].
Brain Death
The absence of a PLR is required for the diagnosis of brain death, and assessment with a flashlight is subject to error [2•]. This is highlighted by a case study in which flashlight assessment revealed fixed pupils. Upon use of pupillometry, his pupils were found to be reactive and he was taken for hematoma evacuation, eventually having good recovery [1]. There is an additional case series in which pupillometry found intact PLR for 3 patients in whom the PLR by flashlight was evaluated as absent [56]. Olgun et al. [57] measured pupil sizes in 57 infants, children, and adults diagnosed with brain death. The median right and left pupil sizes were 5.01 ± 0.85 mm and 5.12 ± 0.87 mm, respectively, with a range between 3.69 and 7.34 mm and not affected by vasopressor agents. The pupil sizes were larger in pediatric subjects [57].
Medical Conditions
Cardiac Arrest
Assessment of the pupillary light reflex has been recognized as an essential part of the prognostic neurological examination performed after hypoxic-ischemic cerebral damage after a cardiac arrest. Mild hypoxia dilates the pupil and depresses light reflex [41]. In a study of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, the maximum pupillary diameter was found to be a strong predictor of return of spontaneous circulation and was also significantly correlated with neuron-specific enolase concentrations [58]. A prospective multi-center study of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest noted that the PLR values of survivors and patients with favorable neurological outcomes were consistently greater than those of non-survivors (poor outcome (sensitivity = 0.87; specificity = 0.80) vs. favorable neurological outcomes (sensitivity = 0.92; specificity of 0.74)) and a 6-h PLR of < 3% uniformly predicted mortality at 90 days [59•]. In a separate study, a PLR of less than 13% within the first 48 h of resuscitation was predictive of mortality [27]. Similar studies support the prognostic value of pupillometry after cardiac arrest (Table 2).
Pupillometry has been used for prognostication of survivors of cardiac arrest. In a prospective cohort of 103 adult patients who were comatose 48 h after cardiac arrest, a quantitative PLR < 13% had 100% specificity and positive predictive value to predict poor recovery and performed as well as EEG and SSEP [27, 63•]. Higher NPi (better PLR responsiveness) is associated with improved 30-day outcomes in out-of-hospital, but not in-hospital cardiac arrest [60]. A reduced percent change in pupillary size was associated with worse electroencephalographic prognosis compared with those with great change in pupil size [61]. An international multi-center double-blinded prospective study validated the use of pupillometry using the NPi to predict outcome after cardiac arrest. At any time between day 1 and day 3, an NPi of ≤ 2 had a 51% negative predictive value and a 100% positive predictive value for the prediction of unfavorable outcome. The NPi performed better than the manual PLR. The addition of NPi to other tests like SSEP increased sensitivity of outcome prediction, while maintaining 100% specificity [26]. Several recent publications have studied the predictive value of quantitative pupillometry in patients treated with hypothermia after cardiac arrest. Higher PLR amplitudes have been associated with good outcomes, and a PLR amplitude of < 7% on day 2 predicted 3-month poor outcome with a specificity of 100% and sensitivity of 42% [21, 62].
Drugs
A drug or intervention that has an effect on the PLR would be expected to change the light reflex amplitude. With preserved integrity of the 2nd and 3rd cranial nerves and uninterrupted neural pathways through the pretectum and upper midbrain, the patient should have a normal light reflex. A review by Dr. Larson in 2015 summarizes the known neurotransmitter role in ciliary ganglion and pupillary sphincter activity (nicotinic and muscarinic respectively), but the pretectal and Edinger-Westphal nuclei appear to be possibly glutamate excitatory synapse junctions based on the timing and shape of the reflex arch suggestive of a rapidly acting ligand gated channels [41]. This leads to further need to clarify pharmacologic effect of neurotropic drugs on pupillary dynamics.
During general anesthesia, the sympathetic activity of the pupil is absent but present in other areas of the sympathetic nervous system [41, 64]. In anesthetized subjects, the pupillary changes during anesthesia are a result of alterations in pupillary sphincter tone directly controlled by neuronal activity within the upper mesencephalon [41, 65]. Similarly, with slow-wave sleep or during anesthesia with propofol, barbiturates, or inhaled anesthetics, the Edinger-Westphal (EW) neurons are thought to be spontaneous pacemakers, disinhibited by quiescence of various centers in the midbrain and posterior hypothalamus leading to rapid intrinsic firing. With lack of background inhibition to overcome the EW firing, pupils will fail to dilate in the dark. Sympathetic tone of the pupil during anesthesia is also lost, contributing to miosis. After approximately 10 min of full sedation with inhaled anesthesia, for example, the pupil stabilizes at a “basal diameter” of about 2 mm [41, 64].
Alcohol has also been shown to affect both pupil diameter as well as peak constriction amplitudes and velocities, though data is discrepant showing both increases and decreases in size, amplitude, and velocity depending on dose, time of ingestion, and dose of ingestion [66]. Similarly, recreational drugs with increased sympathomimetic activity due to increased noradrenalin and serotonin signally, such as 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine and tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), have demonstrated increased latency and decreased constriction amplitude and velocity, as well as reduction in PLR recovery time [67, 68].
Despite the sympatholytic effect of diazepam, there was no significant effect on pupil diameter or pupillary light reflex [69]. Dexmedetomidine was examined in a similar way and produced no change in pupil size and light reflex recovery time but increased the light reflex from 0.30 ± 0.14 to 0.37 ± 0.12 mm and significantly reduced pupillary reflex dilation by 72 ± 62% [70, 71].
Organophosphate poisoning and botulinum toxins that block release of acetylcholine receptors have the expected response of paralysis of sympathetic and parasympathetic innervation to the iris resulting in pupil dilation and attenuation of the PLR. There is discrepant data, but the majority of effect of organophosphate and antimuscarinic agents appears to be from direct application and effect on ocular tissue rather than systemic absorption [36, 72].
Other Factors Affecting Pupillometry Output
Age is known to affect pupillary size. The resting aperture of the pupil decreases approximately 0.4 mm during each decade of life after 16 years of age. Sex and iris color, the latter of which would be expected to have a profound effect on manual penlight examination, have been suspected limitations of pupillometry [73]. PLR changes have been investigated as a nonverbal marker of pain [18, 41, 74,75,76]. Notably, because PRD is an evoked reflex, patients in constant pain may have small or mid-position pupils [41, 77] but will demonstrate changes in pupillary dilation when painful stimulus is administered [19, 78,79,80].
There have been several analyses regarding alteration in pupil size and particularly the pupillary light reflex in patients with Parkinson disease and Alzheimer disease. Most studies focused on the PLR parameters most affected by acetylcholine-dependent mechanisms and found significant reduction in CV and constriction amplitude when compared with normal age-matched subjects, though the duration of light stimulus during these studies has been implicated in discrepancies among the existing data [81, 82]. Similarly, pupillometry data with variable abnormalities in CV and size have been associated with severity in neurodegenerative conditions including multisystem atrophy [83] and autism spectrum disorders [36, 81, 84, 85].
Discussion
Though it is superior to routine penlight examination in general, the standardization and generalization of pupillometry data for use in assessment, therapeutics, and research must take into account population-related differences in baseline pupil size and function. Over the decades, baseline differences in pupil size and function have been recorded in different populations, all of which may be encountered within the neurocritical care population. This underscores the importance of having baseline and serial measurements as well as well-established normative data for reference.
Additional factors should be considered when using automated pupillometry. As with a standard penlight examination, topical drugs such as pilocarpine or atropine, iris-lens adhesions, uveitis, and syndromes including Adie pupil, Argyll Robertson pupil, Horner’s syndrome etc. may alter clinical interpretation of pupillometry data.
It is important to note that not all data prior to pupillometry can be compared across populations, as studies used different duration of light, control of ambient light, intensity and color of light, and devices. This makes comparison across studies difficult. While the accuracy and reliability of these measured variables has been demonstrated, the advent of pupillometry has provided a host of unique new variables. There is a need for research to determine the utility of each variable, and within context of various pathophysiologic conditions. The variables CV, DV, latency, and NPi are relatively new to clinical practice. Future research will provide insight to the full utility of high-fidelity PLR assessments.
Automated pupillometry has many potential applications. It is portable, and, compared with most other neuroimaging modalities, inexpensive. The true cost efficacy of replacing the standard penlight examination is difficult to determine, as emerging literature suggests early prediction of ICP and treatment effect may be a measurable outcome, but there is unlikely to be a global mortality benefit from incorporation of any monitoring tool. Moreover, there is no research demonstrating any adverse effects from pupillometer assessments. Therefore, the technology allows safe, serial evaluation of patients and permits rapid assessment of a vital portion of the neurologic examination.
Conclusion
Pupillometry allows for rapid assessment of a vital component of intracranial pathology. We already know that the findings from this assessment clearly affect clinical decisions. The prognostic value of incorporating automated pupillometry results when assessing for brain death or outcomes after out of hospital cardiac arrest supports its clinical use, but more data is needed to determine what normative values in these populations and timing of evaluation with sensitive and accurate data. Similar to clinical evolution of the echocardiogram, with increasing diagnostic use, hopefully identification of population norms and characterizing abnormalities will allow for augmentation of the traditional pupil examination, and over time we will learn how to incorporate the additional data from pupillometry into clinical practice and research. At a minimum, the ability of pupillometry to generate an objective, repeatable, and reliable pupil examination far superior to that of a flashlight supports the assertion that this technology should become standard practice.
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance
Emelifeonwu JA, Reid K, Rhodes JK, Myles L. Saved by the pupillometer! - a role for pupillometry in the acute assessment of patients with traumatic brain injuries? Brain Inj. 2018;32(5):675–7.
• Olson DM, Stutzman S, Saju C, Wilson M, Zhao W, Aiyagari V. Interrater reliability of pupillary assessments. Neurocrit Care. 2016;24(2):251–7 Established reliability and evidence for standardization of assessment, highlighted low reliability of manual pupillary examination in current standard practice.
Couret D, Boumaza D, Grisotto C, Triglia T, Pellegrini L, Ocquidant P, et al. Reliability of standard pupillometry practice in neurocritical care: an observational, double-blinded study. Crit Care (London, England). 2016;20:99.
Kerr RG, Bacon AM, Baker LL, Gehrke JS, Hahn KD, Lillegraven CL, et al. Underestimation of pupil size by critical care and neurosurgical nurses. American journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses. 2016;25(3):213–9.
Meeker M, Du R, Bacchetti P, Privitera CM, Larson MD, Holland MC, et al. Pupil examination: validity and clinical utility of an automated pupillometer. The Journal of neuroscience nursing : journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses. 2005;37(1):34–40.
Ortega-Perez S, Amaya-Rey MC. Secondary brain injury: a concept analysis. The Journal of neuroscience nursing : journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses. 2018;50(4):220–4.
Klein SP, Depreitere B. What determines outcome in patients that suffer raised intracranial pressure after traumatic brain injury? Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2018;126:51–4.
• Ortega-Perez S, Shoyombo I, Aiyagari V, Atem F, Hill M, Stutzman SE, et al. Pupillary light reflex variability as a predictor of clinical outcomes in subarachnoid hemorrhage. The Journal of neuroscience nursing : journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses. 2019;51(4):171–5 Novel use of pupillometry to predict clinical outcome in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.
Riker RR, Sawyer ME, Fischman VG, May T, Lord C, Eldridge A, et al. Neurological pupil index and pupillary light reflex by pupillometry predict outcome early after cardiac arrest. Neurocrit Care. 2019.
Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet. 1974;2(7872):81–4.
• Shoyombo I, Aiyagari V, Stutzman SE, Atem F, Hill M, Figueroa SA, et al. Understanding the relationship between the neurologic pupil index and constriction velocity values. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):6992 Defined relationship between NPi and constriction velocity and emphasized that having a brisk constriction velocity does not rule out an abnormal pupillary light reflex.
Zhao W, Stutzman S, Olson D, Saju C, Wilson M, Aiyagari V. Inter-device reliability of the NPi-100 pupillometer. J Clin Neurosc. 2016:ePub.
• Jahns FP, Miroz JP, Messerer M, Daniel RT, Taccone FS, Eckert P, et al. Quantitative pupillometry for the monitoring of intracranial hypertension in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Crit Care (London, England). 2019;23(1):155 First study to correlate quantitative pupillometry measures to changes in intracranial pressure in traumatic brain injury.
• Aoun SG, Stutzman S, Vo P-UN, Ahmadieh TYE, Osman M, Neeley O, et al. Detection of delayed cerebral ischemia using objective pupillometry in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg. 2019;1 First study, though small sample size, to demonstrate correlation and possible predictive value of abnormal pupillometry measurements in development of delayed cerebral ischemia.
Osman M, Stutzman S. Folefac A. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis: Correlation of objective pupillometry to midline shift in acute stroke patients; 2019.
• Natzeder S, Mack DJ, Maissen G, Strassle C, Keller E, Muroi C. Portable infrared pupillometer in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage: prognostic value and circadian rhythm of the Neurological Pupil Index (NPi). J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2018; First study, though small sample size, to correlate pupillometry findings with clinical severity of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.
• Ong C, Hutch M, Barra M, Kim A, Zafar S, Smirnakis S. Effects of osmotic therapy on pupil reactivity: quantification using pupillometry in critically ill neurologic patients. Neurocrit Care. 2019;30(2):307–15 Novel use of quantitative pupillometry to monitor treatment effect of osmotic therapy for intracranial hypertension.
Wildemeersch D, Baeten M, Peeters N, Saldien V, Vercauteren M, Hans G. Pupillary dilation reflex and pupillary pain index evaluation during general anaesthesia: a pilot study. Rom J Anaesth Intensive Care. 2018;25(1):19–23.
Lukaszewicz AC, Dereu D, Gayat E, Payen D. The relevance of pupillometry for evaluation of analgesia before noxious procedures in the intensive care unit. Anesth Analg. 2015;120(6):1297–300.
Anderson CD, James ML. Survival and independence after intracerebral hemorrhage: trends and opportunities. Neurology. 2018;90(23):1043–4.
Suys T, Bouzat P, Marques-Vidal P, Sala N, Payen JF, Rossetti AO, et al. Automated quantitative pupillometry for the prognostication of coma after cardiac arrest. Neurocrit Care. 2014;21(2):300–8.
McNett M, Moran C, Grimm D, Gianakis A. Pupillometry trends in the setting of increased intracranial pressure. J Neurosci Nurs. 2018;50(6):357–61.
McNett M, Moran C, Janki C, Gianakis A. Correlations between hourly pupillometer readings and intracranial pressure values. J Neurosci Nurs. 2017;49(4):229–34.
Papangelou A, Zink EK, Chang WW, Frattalone A, Gergen D, Gottschalk A, et al. Automated pupillometry and detection of clinical transtentorial brain herniation: a case series. Mil Med. 2018;183(1–2):e113–e21.
Kim HM, Yang HK, Hwang JM. Quantitative analysis of pupillometry in isolated third nerve palsy. PLoS One. 2018;13(11):e0208259.
Oddo M, Sandroni C, Citerio G, Miroz JP, Horn J, Rundgren M, et al. Quantitative versus standard pupillary light reflex for early prognostication in comatose cardiac arrest patients: an international prospective multicenter double-blinded study. Intensive Care Med. 2018;44(12):2102–11.
Solari D, Rossetti AO, Carteron L, Miroz JP, Novy J, Eckert P, et al. Early prediction of coma recovery after cardiac arrest with blinded pupillometry. Ann Neurol. 2017;81(6):804–10.
Lee MH, Mitra B, Pui JK, Fitzgerald M. The use and uptake of pupillometers in the intensive care unit. Aust Crit Care. 2018;31(4):199–203.
Phillips SS, Mueller CM, Nogueira RG, Khalifa YM. A systematic review assessing the current state of automated pupillometry in the NeuroICU. Neurocrit Care. 2019;31(1):142–61.
Wilson SAK. Ectopia pupillae in certain mesencephalic lesions. Brain : a journal of neurology. 1907;29(4):524–36.
Fisher CM. Oval pupils. Arch Neurol. 1980;37(8):502–3.
Marshall LF, Barba D, Toole BM, Bowers SA. The oval pupil: clinical significance and relationship to intracranial hypertension. J Neurosurg. 1983;58(4):566–8.
Taylor WR, Chen JW, Meltzer H, Gennarelli TA, Kelbch C, Knowlton S, et al. Quantitative pupillometry, a new technology: normative data and preliminary observations in patients with acute head injury. Technical note. J Neurosurg. 2003;98(1):205–13.
Atchison DA, Girgenti CC, Campbell GM, Dodds JP, Byrnes TM, Zele AJ. Influence of field size on pupil diameter under photopic and mesopic light levels. Clin Exp Optom. 2011;94(6):545–8.
Wang Y, Zekveld AA, Naylor G, Ohlenforst B, Jansma EP, Lorens A, et al. Parasympathetic nervous system dysfunction, as identified by pupil light reflex, and its possible connection to hearing impairment. PLoS One. 2016;11(4):e0153566.
Hall CA, Chilcott RP. Eyeing up the future of the pupillary light reflex in neurodiagnostics. Diagnostics (Basel). 2018;8(1).
Olson DM, Fishel M. The use of automated pupillometry in critical care. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 2016;28(1):101–7.
Adhikari P, Zele AJ, Feigl B. The post-illumination pupil response (PIPR). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015;56(6):3838–49.
Loewenfeld IE. Mechanisms of reflex dilatation of the pupil; historical review and experimental analysis. Doc Ophthalmol. 1958;12:185–448.
Barbur JL, Moro S, Harlow JA, Lam BL, Liu M. Comparison of pupil responses to luminance and colour in severe optic neuritis. Clin Neurophysiol. 2004;115(11):2650–8.
Larson MD, Behrends M. Portable infrared pupillometry: a review. Anesth Analg. 2015;120(6):1242–53.
Robba C, Moro Salihovic B, Pozzebon S, Creteur J, Oddo M, Vincent JL, et al. Comparison of 2 automated pupillometry devices in critically ill patients. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2019:1.
Ong C, Hutch M, Smirnakis S. The effect of ambient light conditions on quantitative pupillometry. Neurocrit Care. 2019;30(2):316–21.
Park JG, Moon CT, Park DS, Song SW. Clinical utility of an automated pupillometer in patients with acute brain lesion. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2015;58(4):363–7.
Olson DM, Ortega-Perez S. The cue-response theory and nursing care of the patient with acquired brain injury. The Journal of neuroscience nursing : journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses. 2018;51(1):43–7.
Kasprowicz M, Burzynska M, Melcer T, Kubler A. A comparison of the Full Outline of UnResponsiveness (FOUR) score and Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) in predictive modelling in traumatic brain injury. Br J Neurosurg. 2016;30(2):211–20.
Thiagarajan P, Ciuffreda KJ. Pupillary responses to light in chronic non-blast-induced mTBI. Brain Inj. 2015;29(12):1420–5.
Cohen JE, Montero A, Israel ZH. Prognosis and clinical relevance of anisocoria-craniotomy latency for epidural hematoma in comatose patients. J Trauma. 1996;41(1):120–2.
Lieberman JD, Pasquale MD, Garcia R, Cipolle MD, Mark Li P, Wasser TE. Use of admission Glasgow Coma Score, pupil size, and pupil reactivity to determine outcome for trauma patients. J Trauma. 2003;55(3):437–42 discussion 42-3.
Stevens AR, Su Z, Toman E, Belli A, Davies D. Optical pupillometry in traumatic brain injury: neurological pupil index and its relationship with intracranial pressure through significant event analysis. Brain Inj. 2019;33(8):1032–8.
Soeken TA, Alonso A, Grant A, Calvillo E, Gutierrez-Flores B, Clark J, et al. Quantitative pupillometry for detection of intracranial pressure changes during head-down tilt. Aerospace medicine and human performance. 2018;89(8):717–23.
Aoun SG, Welch B, Cortes M. Objective pupillometry as an adjunct to prediction and assessment for oculomotor nerve injury and recovery: potential for practical applications. World Neurosurg. 2018.
Yoo YJ, Yang HK, Hwang JM. Efficacy of digital pupillometry for diagnosis of Horner syndrome. PLoS One. 2017;12(6):e0178361.
Peinkhofer C, Martens P, Grand J, Truelsen T, Knudsen GM, Kjaergaard J, et al. Influence of strategic cortical infarctions on pupillary function. Front Neurol. 2018;9:916.
Shirozu K, Murayama K, Karashima Y, Setoguchi H, Miura T, Hoka S. The relationship between seizure in electroconvulsive therapy and pupillary response using an automated pupilometer. J Anesth. 2018;32(6):866–71.
Larson MD, Muhiudeen I. Pupillometric analysis of the ‘absent light reflex’. Arch Neurol. 1995;52(4):369–72.
Olgun G, Newey CR, Ardelt A. Pupillometry in brain death: differences in pupillary diameter between paediatric and adult subjects. Neurol Res. 2015;37(11):945–50.
Yokobori S, Wang KKK, Yang Z, Zhu T, Tyndall JA, Mondello S, et al. Quantitative pupillometry and neuron-specific enolase independently predict return of spontaneous circulation following cardiogenic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a prospective pilot study. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):15964.
• Tamura T, Namiki J, Sugawara Y, Sekine K, Yo K, Kanaya T, et al. Quantitative assessment of pupillary light reflex for early prediction of outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a multicentre prospective observational study. Resuscitation. 2018;131:108–13 Small but provocative study correlating very early quantitative pupillometry findings with neurologic outcomes after cardiac arrest.
Obling L, Hassager C, Illum C, Grand J, Wiberg S, Lindholm MG, et al. Prognostic value of automated pupillometry: an unselected cohort from a cardiac intensive care unit. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2019;2048872619842004.
Beuchat I, Solari D, Novy J, Oddo M, Rossetti AO. Standardized EEG interpretation in patients after cardiac arrest: correlation with other prognostic predictors. Resuscitation. 2018;126:143–6.
Heimburger D, Durand M, Gaide-Chevronnay L, Dessertaine G, Moury PH, Bouzat P, et al. Quantitative pupillometry and transcranial Doppler measurements in patients treated with hypothermia after cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2016;103:88–93.
• Solari D, Miroz J-P, Oddo M. Opening a window to the injured brain: non-invasive neuromonitoring with quantitative pupillometry. In: Vincent J-L, editor. Annual update in intensive care and emergency medicine 2018. Cham: Springer international publishing; 2018. p. 503–18. One of the largest recent prospective studies to assess utility of quantitative automated pupillometry in predicting neurologic outcome after cardiac arrest compared with other prediction tools.
Behrends M, Larson MD, Neice AE, Bokoch MP. Suppression of pupillary unrest by general anesthesia and propofol sedation. J Clin Monit Comput. 2019;33(2):317–23.
Larson MD, Sessler DI. Pupillometry to guide postoperative analgesia. Anesthesiology. 2012;116(5):980–2.
Lobato-Rincon LL, Cabanillas Campos MC, Navarro-Valls JJ, Bonnin-Arias C, Chamorro E, Sanchez-Ramos RC. Utility of dynamic pupillometry in alcohol testing on drivers. Adicciones. 2013;25(2):137–45.
Hysek CM, Liechti ME. Effects of MDMA alone and after pretreatment with reboxetine, duloxetine, clonidine, carvedilol, and doxazosin on pupillary light reflex. Psychopharmacology. 2012;224(3):363–76.
Hartman RL, Richman JE, Hayes CE, Huestis MA. Drug Recognition Expert (DRE) examination characteristics of cannabis impairment. Accid Anal Prev. 2016;92:219–29.
Hou RH, Scaife J, Freeman C, Langley RW, Szabadi E, Bradshaw CM. Relationship between sedation and pupillary function: comparison of diazepam and diphenhydramine. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2006;61(6):752–60.
Artigas C, Redondo JI, Lopez-Murcia MM. Effects of intravenous administration of dexmedetomidine on intraocular pressure and pupil size in clinically normal dogs. Vet Ophthalmol. 2012;15(Suppl 1):79–82.
Larson MD, Talke PO. Effect of dexmedetomidine, an alpha2-adrenoceptor agonist, on human pupillary reflexes during general anaesthesia. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2001;51(1):27–33.
Akkaya S, Kokcen HK, Atakan T. Unilateral transient mydriasis and ptosis after botulinum toxin injection for a cosmetic procedure. Clin Ophthalmol. 2015;9:313–5.
Bertrand AL, Garcia JB, Viera EB, Santos AM, Bertrand RH. Pupillometry: the influence of gender and anxiety on the pain response. Pain Physician. 2013;16(3):E257–66.
Larson MD, Berry PD. Supraspinal pupillary effects of intravenous and epidural fentanyl during isoflurane anesthesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2000;25(1):60–6.
Guglielminotti J, Mentre F, Gaillard J, Ghalayini M, Montravers P, Longrois D. Assessment of pain during labor with pupillometry: a prospective observational study. Anesth Analg. 2013;116(5):1057–62.
Paulus J, Roquilly A, Beloeil H, Theraud J, Asehnoune K, Lejus C. Pupillary reflex measurement predicts insufficient analgesia before endotracheal suctioning in critically ill patients. Critical care (London, England). 2013;17(4):R161.
Kantor E, Montravers P, Longrois D, Guglielminotti J. Pain assessment in the postanaesthesia care unit using pupillometry: a cross-sectional study after standard anaesthetic care. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2014;31(2):91–7.
Aissou M, Snauwaert A, Dupuis C, Atchabahian A, Aubrun F, Beaussier M. Objective assessment of the immediate postoperative analgesia using pupillary reflex measurement: a prospective and observational study. Anesthesiology. 2012;116(5):1006–12.
Wildemeersch D, Gios J, Jorens PG, Hans GH. Objective nociceptive assessment in ventilated ICU patients: a feasibility study using pupillometry and the nociceptive flexion reflex. J Vis Exp. 2018;137.
Sabourdin N, Peretout JB, Khalil E, Guye ML, Louvet N, Constant I. Influence of depth of hypnosis on pupillary reactivity to a standardized tetanic stimulus in patients under propofol-remifentanil target-controlled infusion: a crossover randomized pilot study. Anesth Analg. 2018;126(1):70–7.
Silva CRG, Goncalves C, Camilo ENR, Boaretti Dos Santos F, Siqueira J, de Albuquerque ES, et al. Automated evaluation system for human pupillary behavior. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;245:589–93.
Bartosova O, Bonnet C, Ulmanova O, Sima M, Perlik F, Ruzicka E, et al. Pupillometry as an indicator of L-DOPA dosages in Parkinson’s disease patients. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2018;125(4):699–703.
Park HL, Jung SH, Park SH, Park CK. Detecting autonomic dysfunction in patients with glaucoma using dynamic pupillometry. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98(11):e14658.
Wagner JB, Luyster RJ, Tager-Flusberg H, Nelson CA. Greater pupil size in response to emotional faces as an early marker of social-communicative difficulties in infants at high risk for autism. Infancy. 2016;21(5):560–81.
Nystrom P, Gliga T, Nilsson Jobs E, Gredeback G, Charman T, Johnson MH, et al. Enhanced pupillary light reflex in infancy is associated with autism diagnosis in toddlerhood. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):1678.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
Bethany L. Lussier and Venkatesh Aiyagari each declare no potential conflicts of interest. DaiWai M. Olson reports grants from Neuroptics Inc., outside the submitted work; and he also serves as the editor for the Journal of Neuroscience Nursing.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Critical Care
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lussier, B.L., Olson, D.M. & Aiyagari, V. Automated Pupillometry in Neurocritical Care: Research and Practice. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 19, 71 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-019-0994-z
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-019-0994-z