Abstract
In this paper, response spectral characteristics of one-, two-, and three-lobe sinusoidal acceleration pulses are investigated, and some of their basic properties are derived. Furthermore, the empirical mode decomposition (EMD) method is utilized as an adaptive filter to decompose the near-fault pulse-like ground motions, which were recorded during the September 20, 1999, Chi-Chi earthquake. These ground motions contain distinct velocity pulses, and were decomposed into high-frequency (HF) and low-frequency (LF) components, from which the corresponding HF acceleration pulse (if existing) and LF acceleration pulse could be easily identified and detected. Finally, the identified acceleration pulses are modeled by simplified sinusoidal approximations, whose dynamic behaviors are compared to those of the original acceleration pulses as well as to those of the original HF and LF acceleration components in the context of elastic response spectra. It was demonstrated that it is just the acceleration pulses contained in the near-fault pulse-like ground motion that fundamentally dominate the special impulsive dynamic behaviors of such motion in an engineering sense. The motion thus has a greater potential to cause severe damage than the far-field ground motions, i.e. they impose high base shear demands on engineering structures as well as placing very high deformation demands on long-period structures.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Agrawal AK and He WL (2002), “A Closed-form Approximation of Near-fault Ground Motion Pulses for Flexible Structures,” Proc. 15th ASCE Engineering Mechanics Conference, Columbia University, New York.
Aki K (1968), “Seismic Displacements Near a Fault,” J. Geophys. Res., 73(16): 5359–5376.
Alavi B and Krawinkler H (2000), “Consideration of Near-fault Ground Motion Effects in Seismic Design,” Proc. 12th World Conf. on Earthquake Engng., Auckland, New Zealand (Feb. 4) (CD-ROM).
Archuleta RJ and Hartzell SH (1981), “Effects of Fault Finiteness on Near-source Ground Motion,” Bull. Seismological Soc. Am., 71(4): 939–957.
Bertero VV (1976), “Establishment of Design Earthquakes — Evaluation of Present Methods,” Proc. Int. Symp. on Earthquake Structural Engineering, St. Louis, Vol. 1, pp.551–580.
Bertero VV, Mashin SA and Herrera RA (1978), “Aseismic Design Implications of Near-fault San Fernando Earthquake Records,” Earthquake Engng. Struct. Dyn., 6(1): 31–42.
Bolt BA (1983), “The Contribution of Directivity Focusing to Earthquake Intensities,” Report No. 20, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Vicksburg, MS.
Chopra AK and Chintanapakdee C (2001), “Comparing Response of SDF Systems to Near-fault and Far-fault Earthquake Motions in the Context of Spectral Regions,” Earthquake Engng. Struct. Dyn., 30: 1769–1789.
Dai JW, Mai T, Lee GC, Qi XZ and Bai WT (2004), “Dynamic Responses Under the Excitation Pulse Sequences,” Earthquake Engng. Engng. Vib., 3(2): 157–170.
Huang NE, Shen Z, Long SR, Wu MC, Shih HH, Zheng Q, Yen NC, Tung CC and Liu MH (1998), “The Empirical Mode Decomposition and Hilbert Spectrum for Nonlinear and Nonstationary Time Series Analysis,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond., A(454):903–995.
Iwan WD (1997), “Drift Spectrum: Measure of Demand for Earthquake Ground Motions,” J. Struct. Engng., ASCE, 123(4): 397–404.
Jennings PC (2001), “Ground Motion Pulses and Structural Response,” Earthquake Engineering Frontiers in the New Millennium, Spencer & Hu (eds), Swets & Zeitlinger.
Loh CH, Lee ZK, Wu TC and Peng SY (2000), “Ground Motion Characteristics of the Chi-Chi Earthquake of 21 September 1999,” Earthquake Engng. Struct. Dyn., 29: 867–897.
Makris N and Chang SP (2000), “Response of Damped Oscillators to Cycloidal Pulses,” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, 126(2): 123–131.
Makris N and Black CJ (2004), “Evaluation of Peak Ground Velocity as a Good Intensity Measure for Near-source Ground Motions,” J. Struct. Engng., ASCE 130(9): 1032–1044.
Malhotra PK (1999), “Response of Buildings to Near-Field Pulse-like Ground Motions,” Earthquake Engng. Struct. Dyn., 28: 1309–1326.
Mavroedis GP and Papageorgiou AS (2003), “A Mathematical Representation of Near-fault Ground Motions,” Bull. Seismological Soc. Am., 93: 1099–1131.
Mavroedis GP, Dong G and Papageorgiou AS (2004), “Near-fault Ground Motions, and the Response of Elastic and Inelastic Single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) Systems,” Earthquake Engng. Struct. Dyn., 33: 1023–1049.
Sasani M and Bertero VV (2000), “Importance of Severe Pulse-type Ground Motions in Performance-based Engineering: Historical and Critical Review,” Proc. 12th World Conf. on Earthquake Engng., Auckland, New Zealand (Feb. 4) (CD-ROM).
Singh JP (1985), “Earthquake Ground Motions: Implications for Designing Structures and Reconciling Structural Damage,” Earthquake Spectra, 1(2), 239–270.
Somerville PG, Smith NF, Graves RW and Abrahamson NA (1997), “Modification of Empirical Strong Ground Motion Attenuation Relations to Include the Amplitude and Duration Effects of Rupture Directivity,” Seismological Research Letters, 68: 180–203.
Someville P (1998), “Development of an Improved Representation of Near-fault Ground Motions,” SMIP98 Seminar on Utilization of Strong-Motion Data (Sept. 15), Oakland, Calif.
Sucuogly H, Erberik MA and Yucemen MS (1999), “Influence of Peak Ground Velocity on Seismic Failure Probability,” Proc. 4th Int. Conf. of the European Association for Structural Dynamics (EURO-DYN 99), Prague, Czech Republic.
Xu LJ, Xie LL and Hao M (2005), “On the Response Spectra to Harmonic Ground Motion,” Engineering Mechanics, 22(5): 7–13. (in Chinese)
Zhang RR, Ma S, Safak E and Hartzell S (2003), “Hilbert-Huang Transform Analysis of Dynamic and Earthquake Motion Recordings,” J. Struct. Engng., ASCE, 129(8): 861–875.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Supported by: Natural Science Foundation of China Under Grant No. 50278090
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, Y., Hu, Y., Zhao, F. et al. Identification of acceleration pulses in near-fault ground motion using the EMD method. Earthq. Engin. Engin. Vib. 4, 201–212 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-005-0003-1
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-005-0003-1