Abstract
Introduction
Bariatric surgery is used to treat severe obesity. We aimed to investigate the incidence of clinically significant bone mineral density (BMD) loss at 6 and 12 months after bariatric surgery.
Methods
Observational study performed in a specialized center for the treatment of obesity at the University Hospital of Reims, France. Surface BMD was measured by dual x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). A reduction of > 0.03 g/cm2 was considered clinically significant.
Results
A total of 110 patients were included. A clinically significant reduction in BMD was observed in 62.1% of patients at 6 months, and in 71.6% at 12 months after surgery. No case of osteoporosis was observed. There were four cases of osteopenia and one fracture post-surgery. BMD loss was related by univariate analysis to the reduction in body mass index (BMI) (p < 0.01), weight loss (p < 0.01), fat mass (p < 0.01), and lean mass (p < 0.01). Multivariable analysis found a significant association between the reduction in BMD and the excess weight loss percentage (odds ratio 1.11, 95% confidence interval (1.05–1.18), p < 0.001).
Conclusion
There was a clinically significant reduction in BMD at 6 months after surgery in over 60% of patients undergoing bariatric surgery. BMD loss is persistent over time and predominantly situated at the femoral level, and strongly associated with weight loss. Systematic vitamin and calcium supplementation, as well as follow-up by DEXA scan seems appropriate. Systematic DEXA scan pre- and post-surgery, and annually thereafter until weight has stabilized seems appropriate.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
According to data from the World Health Organization (WHO), obesity has nearly tripled since 1975. In 2016, over 650 million (about 13%) of the world’s adult population (11% of men and 15% of women) were obese in 2016 [1]. Over the last decades, obesity has become a health threat for the individual patient as well as a major socio-economic burden [1].
Bariatric surgery is a reference treatment for obesity, performed as second-line therapy after failure of medical management lasting at least 6 to 12 months [2]. Bariatric surgery leads to lasting, significant loss of 50 to 70% of excess body weight, making it one of the most effective therapeutic options [3]. According to the recommendations of the European guidelines for obesity management published in 2015 [2], bariatric surgery is indicated for patients with a body mass index (BMI) (weight/height2) > 50 kg/m2, or for patients with a BM ≥ 35 kg/m2 associated with at least one comorbidity (psycho-pathological, cutaneous, orthopedic, cardio-respiratory, endocrine, metabolic).
The number of bariatric surgeries has been increasing in the last years. In 2013, 468,609 bariatric surgeries were performed worldwide. Bariatric surgery was performed most frequently in the USA, Canada, and France [4]. Surgical interventions to treat morbid obesity can be divided in two categories: interventions that restrict stomach capacity (including adjustable gastric banding and sleeve gastrectomy) and interventions that limit absorption: gastric bypass or biliopancreatic diversion.
Numerous studies have investigated the impact of bariatric surgery on bone mineral density (BMD) [3, 5,6,7]. The results are often based on the percentage variation in BMD before and after surgery, which only partially reflects the true processes. In rheumatology practice, the Smallest Detectable Difference (SDD) has been used to assess the reproducibility of BMD measurements in vivo between two different dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) machines [8]. The SDD is estimated at 0.03 g/cm2 [8]. This SDD corresponds to clinically significant bone loss, and BMD change has been shown to be an independent risk factor for fragility fractures [9].
In this context, the main aim of this study was to estimate the incidence of clinically significant BMD loss at 6 and 12 months after bariatric surgery. Secondary objectives were to study the prevalence and incidence of osteoporosis and occurrence of fractures in patients treated by bariatric surgery, and to identify factors associated with a clinically significant reduction in BMD.
Materials and Methods
Study Design
A national plan for obesity deployed in France from 2010 to 2013 created specialized centers for obesity management (COMs). These are centers that have a multidisciplinary team available to treat patients with obesity and are equipped with appropriate facilities for the management of severe obesity. There are currently 37 COMs in France.
We performed an observational, retrospective, single-center study in the University Hospital of Reims at the COM for the region of Champagne-Ardenne. We included patients aged 18 years and older, followed up at the COM of Champagne-Ardenne, who underwent bariatric surgery between January 2013 and December 2015, and who had at least one DEXA scan pre- and post-operative. Exclusion criteria were weight > 180 kg (maximum weight limit for bone densitometry scan) (Fig. 1).
Measurements
Surface BMD was measured by DEXA scan and expressed in g/cm2. BMD was measured at three sites: the lumbar spine (L1-L4), the femoral neck, and the left total hip. Standard procedures for putting the patient in position for DEXA acquisition did not include manual retraction of the fatty panniculus covering the proximal femur during hip measurements.
The patients included had to have undergone at least one DEXA scan prior to surgery, in order to enable comparison between pre- and post-operative values. Given the current lack of consensus about the best time to perform DEXA scan for follow-up after bariatric surgery, some patients had a follow-up scan at 6 months, and others at 12 months. A small number of patients also had a DEXA scan more than 18 months after surgery.
All DEXA scans were performed using the same machine (Hologic Discovery, Hologic, Inc. Bedford, USA) by two experienced operators. BMD measurement by DEXA scan were coupled with whole-body DEXA scan to allow detailed analysis of the distribution of muscle mass (lean mass) and fat mass in different anatomical regions of the body [10]. In addition to fat mass, the quantity of lean mass and total body mass (in grams) were measured and the ratio of fat mass to lean mass was calculated.
Data Recorded and Endpoints
For all patients, we recorded the type of surgery, risk factors for osteoporosis (Table 1) (osteoporosis-inducing diseases and treatments, alcohol, and tobacco consumption), anthropometric measures (weight, height, and BMI), the level of self-reported physical activity, complications secondary to obesity, vitamin-calcium status, and the type of supplementation and compliance with vitamin-calcium supplementation, self-reported by patients during the medical history. The primary endpoint was the change in BMD measured at the three sites between pre- and post-operative DEXA scans using the same Hologic machine in comparison mode. A reduction in BMD > 0.03 g/cm2 was considered clinically significant [8]. The Z-score and T-score indices for each patient were evaluated and compared. The WHO defines osteoporosis assessed by DEXA, as a T-score ≤ − 2.5 and a Z-score ≤ − 2, and osteopenia as a T-score ≤ − 1 and > − 2.5 [11,12,13].
Statistical Analysis
Quantitative variables were described with the mean ± standard deviation, or the median and interquartile range, and qualitative data as absolute frequencies and percentages. Qualitative variables (type of surgery, sex, hormonal status, physical activity) were compared using the chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test as appropriate. Quantitative variables were compared using Student’s t test when they were normally distributed, and the Mann-Whitney U test otherwise. Associations between age, vitamin D concentration at the start of the study, weight loss, BMI loss, fat mass loss, lean mass loss, and the reduction in BMD at 6 and 12 months were evaluated using Student’s t test. The association between pre-operative BMI, the percentage of excess weight loss, and the reduction in BMD at 6 and 12 months was evaluated by the Mann-Whitney U test.
A multivariable analysis was performed using logistic regression to identify factors associated with a significant BMD loss at 12 months. Variables with a p value < 0.20 in the bivariate analysis were included in the model. To avoid multicollinearity, only the most informative variable relating to weight was included in the multivariable model. p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. All analyses were performed with SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina, USA) and R version 3.3.2 [14].
Results
Patient Characteristics
A total of 110 patients followed up at the COM of Champagne-Ardenne met the inclusion criteria and were included in the study. The characteristics of the study population are shown in Table 1. In our population, 22 (20%) patients had a vitamin D level > 30 ng/mL before the bariatric surgery, 66 (60%) patients at 6 months, and 60 (54.5%) patients at 12 months. Compliance for calcium and vitamin D supplementation was considered adequate in 71 patients (64%).
BMD Change, T-Scores, and Z-Scores (Table 2)
All patients underwent DEXA scan before surgery; the majority performed at least two DEXA scans in the follow-up (i.e., 87 patients —79%). Only 23 patients achieved only one DEXA scan during follow-up (8 patients at 6 months, 13 patients at 12 months, and 2 patients at 18 months).
A clinically significant reduction in BMD (> 0.03 g/cm2 on at least one site) was observed in 59 (62.1%) patients at 6 months after surgery, and 68 (71.6%) at 12 months. Five of the seven patients who had a DEXA at 18 months met the primary endpoint. BMD loss was more frequently observed at the level of the hip and femoral neck.
The percent variation in BMD (at 6 and 12 months) was respectively − 1.2% and − 3.4% at the femoral neck, − 2.0% and − 4.3% for the hip, whereas we observed an increase in BMD at the level of the lumbar spine (+ 5.8% at 6 and + 5.6% at 12 months).
Four patients developed osteopenia (T-score ≤ − 1 and > − 2.5). In the majority of cases, osteopenia occurred at the femoral neck (3/4). After 12 months, no patient had osteoporosis. One patient met the WHO criteria for DEXA osteoporosis before bariatric surgery and was therefore not included in the analysis.
Incidence and Prevalence of Fractures
In our study population, 41 patients (37.35%) had a personal history of fracture, and 10 (9.1%) had a family history of first-degree relatives with fractures, including one fracture of the femoral neck. Only one fracture (0.9%) occurred post-surgery. It was a fracture of the humeral head that occurred in a 38-year-old woman after falling from height 1 year after surgery.
Factors Associated with a Reduction in BMD (Table 3)
In bivariate analysis, only the extent of weight loss was associated with a significant reduction in BMD. Accordingly, at 12 months, there was a significant association between the occurrence of a clinically significant reduction in BMD and weight loss (p < 0.001), drop in BMI (p < 0.001), loss of fat mass (p < 0.001), and loss of lean mass (p < 0.01). In multivariable analysis, the only factor found to be significantly related to BMD loss at 12 months was the percentage of excess weight loss (odds ratio for a change of 1% excess weight loss, 1.12; 95% CI 1.05–1.18; p < 0.001) (Table 3).
In the group that had a positive primary outcome at 12 months, 25 patients had a by-pass and 43 patients had a sleeve gastrectomy. In the group without significant mineral bone density loss, there were less patients with bypass surgery (7 patients).
Discussion
To our knowledge, this study reports the largest series to date of BMD follow-up in patients undergoing bariatric surgery [5, 15,16,17,18,19]. Our study found that more than 70% of patients had clinically significant BMD loss at 12 months after bariatric surgery. This loss of bone density was observed at the femoral neck and femur. At 12 months, the significant reduction in BMD was related by bivariate analysis to the extent of reduction in BMI, weight loss, and to loss of fat and lean mass. In the multivariable analysis, we found a statistically significant relationship between the reduction in BMD and the percentage of excess weight loss. No case of osteoporosis was observed at 12 months after surgery in our series.
Studies that evaluated the percent change in BMD report a reduction at the level of the femoral neck and femur ranging from 6 to 10% at 12 months after bariatric surgery [3]. The variation in our study was 4%. There are several possible explanations for this difference. The patients included in our study were highly selected, as they attended a COM, and were closely followed-up. Vitamin and calcium supplementation were prescribed systematically for all patients. However, vitamin and calcium supplementation were not prescribed uniformly across all studies [16] and are not systematically recommended [218], even though it has been shown that they slow the loss of BMD in patients undergoing bariatric surgery [19]. In addition, even when vitamin and calcium supplementation is prescribed, the duration of treatment varies widely between studies [20].
Secondly, the DEXA scans in our study were all performed by two experienced operators with specific training, in order to optimize reproducibility of the exams and to reduce measurement bias. Measuring bone metabolism in obese patients can be challenging [21]. The penetration of photons is reduced in soft tissue, and the substantial volume of fat can affect the interpretation of bone mineral density. The lack of accuracy in the measurement of BMD by DEXA scan increases with increasing BMI [6, 22]. To limit this potential bias, some studies have used high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography to measure BMD; however, DEXA currently remains the gold standard [22,23,24].
Our study has several strengths, including the large number of patients included. Even if it is a study with a significant number of patients with regular bone monitoring (6 and 12 months) after bariatric surgery, our results should be confirmed by other studies with more patients. We chose to compare absolute values of BMD in g/cm2, since percent change in BMD as used in other studies only partially reflects reality. There may be variations in BMD without their necessarily being clinically pertinent or significant. However, some limitations for this study should be noted. The duration of follow-up was short in this observational cohort, so fractures that would occur later after surgery were not considered. Indeed, only one fracture was observed in our series. In the literature, data are conflicting regarding the risk of fracture after bariatric surgery [25,26,27,28]. Studies with follow-up of less than 2 years do not report an increased risk of fracture [24, 26], whereas other studies with longer follow-up (6 to 12 years) report an increase in the relative risk of any fracture, ranging from a 1.2-fold increase (95% CI 1.02–1.43) [28] to a 2.3-fold increase (95% CI 1.8–2.8) [27]. Weight loss alone could explain the decrease in BMD; however, we could not easily identify a control group of patients with rapid weight who did not undergo surgery.
Likewise, our study cannot differentiate the respective contributions of weight loss and increased physical activity to BMD [26, 27].
The persistent nature of BMD loss has been demonstrated up to 24 months after surgery [22], confirming that BMD loss is prolonged over time. This raises the question of how to follow-up patients who undergo bariatric surgery, and the role of DEXA scanning during this follow-up. Whether the reduction in BMD is secondary to physiological adaptations by the bone metabolism to reduced mechanical constraints, or whether the bone loss is pathological in itself with increased fracture risk remains to be established [9]. In the future, we purport that DEXA scan monitoring should be pursued in these patients to monitor the progression of BMD and fracture risk over the long term.
The main data in the literature on change in bone mineral density after bariatric surgery concern gastric bypass. The reasons are a greater risk of vitamin D deficiency (vitamin D is absorbed by the jejunum and ileum and therefore procedures that bypass this part of intestine such as the RYGB exacerbate vitamin D deficiency), increased weight loss, and reduced food intake [3]. One case–matched study, compare the difference in bone mineral density after three different bariatric procedures [29]. Bone loss at the hips was observed on every patient even with adequate vitamin D supplementation. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass causes significantly greater bone loss than the two other procedures [29]. In our study, the effect seemed to be consistent with the literature; however, it was not statistically significant probably because of the small proportion of patients with bypass surgery.
At present, there is no consensus regarding the indication for a DEXA scan in the follow-up of patients treated by bariatric surgery. DEXA scan is recommended before and either at 2 years after surgery [18], or on an annual basis at least until weight has stabilized [16, 18, 30]. Once weight has stabilized, scans could be repeated every 3 to 5 years, or every 2 years in case of osteoporosis or risk factors for fracture. Early- and long-term systematic calcium and vitamin D supplementation is indicated to avoid deficiency-related osteomalacia [31]. In case of osteoporosis on DEXA or severe fracture, osteoporotic treatment with intravenous bisphosphonates may be proposed in combination with vitamin D-calcium supplementation.
We found that bariatric surgery changes bone metabolism and is related to a clinically significant reduction in femoral BMD. This clinically significant reduction in BMD is significantly related to weight loss. The question remains open as to the clinical impact of this BMD loss. Our findings are reassuring in this regard, with a very low rate of fractures, but the length of follow-up was not long enough in our study to provide more information on this point. Prospective studies over a longer period are warranted to investigate this further, but systematic DEXA scans pre- and post-surgery, then annually until weight has stabilized appear to be appropriate.
References
World Health Organization Obesity and Overweight Factsheet No. 311. 2017.
Yumuk V, Tsigos C, Fried M, et al. European guidelines for obesity management in adults. Obes Facts. 2015;8:402–24. https://doi.org/10.1159/000442721.
Hassan S, Hassan C. Bariatric surgery: what the rheumatologist needs to know. J Rheumatol. 2016;43:1001–7. https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.160075.
Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P, et al. Bariatric surgery worldwide 2013. Obes Surg. 2015;25(10):1822–32.
Liu C, Wu D, Zhang J-F, et al. Changes in bone metabolism in morbidly obese patients after bariatric surgery: a meta-analysis. ObesSurg. 2016;26:91–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-015-1724-5.
Harper C, Pattinson AL, Fernando HA, et al. Effects of obesity treatments on bone mineral density, bone turnover and fracture risk in adults with overweight or obesity. Horm Mol Biol Clin Invest. 2016;0:133–49. https://doi.org/10.1515/hmbci-2016-0025.
Stein EM, Carrelli A, Young P, et al. Bariatric surgery results in cortical bone loss. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98:541–9. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2012-2394.
Kolta S, Ravaud P, Fechtenbaum J, et al. Follow-up of individual patients on two DXA scanners of the same manufacturer. Osteoporos Int. 2000;11:709–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001980070070.
Berger C, Langsetmo L, Joseph L, et al. Association between change in BMD and fragility fracture in women and men. J Bone Miner Res Off J Am Soc Bone Miner Res. 2009;24:361–70. https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.081004.
Kendler DL, Borges JLC, Fielding RA, et al. The official positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry: indications of use and reporting of DXA for body composition. J Clin Densitom. 2013;16:496–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocd.2013.08.020.
Kanis JA, Adachi JD, Cooper C, et al. Standardising the descriptive epidemiology of osteoporosis: recommendations from the epidemiology and quality of life working group of IOF. Osteoporos Int. 2013;24:2763–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-013-2413-7.
Kanis JA, McCloskey EV, Johansson H, et al. A reference standard for the description of osteoporosis. Bone. 2008;42:467–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2007.11.001.
HAS-Haute autorité de santé (2006) Ostéodensitométrie (absoprtiométrieosseuse) sur 2 sites, par méthode biphotonique. http://webzine.hassante.fr/portail/upload/docs/application/pdf/osteodensitometrie_rapport.pdf. Accessed 20 Nov 2016
Anonymous. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. GBIFORG 2015. http://www.gbif.org/resource/81287. Accessed 27 Feb 2017
Ko B-J, Myung SK, Cho K-H, et al. Relationship between bariatric surgery and bone mineral density: a meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2016;26:1414–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-015-1928-8.
Rodríguez-Carmona Y, López-Alavez FJ, González-Garay AG, et al. Bone mineral density after bariatric surgery. A systematic review. Int J Surg. 2014;12:976–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.08.002.
Yu EW. Bone metabolism after bariatric surgery. J Bone Miner Res Off J Am Soc Bone Miner Res. 2014;29:1507–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.2226.
Stein EM, Silverberg SJ. Bone loss after bariatric surgery: causes, consequences, and management. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014;2:165–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(13)70183-9.
Muschitz C, Kocijan R, Haschka J, et al. The impact of vitamin D, calcium, protein supplementation, and physical exercise on bone metabolism after bariatric surgery: the BABS study. J Bone Miner Res Off J Am Soc Bone Miner Res. 2016;31:672–82. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.2707.
Cabral JAV, de Souza GP, Nascimento J de A, et al. Impact of vitamin d and calcium deficiency in the bones of patients undergoing bariatric surgery: a systematic review. Arq Bras Cir Dig ABCD Braz Arch Dig Surg. 2016;29(Suppl1):120–3. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-6720201600S10029.
Roussière M. Obésité et ostéoporose. Réflexions rhumatologiques, février. 2010;14(126):13–7.
Yu EW, Bouxsein ML, Putman MS, et al. Two-year changes in bone density after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100:1452–9. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2014-4341.
Adamczyk P, Bužga M, Holéczy P, et al. Body size, bone mineral density, and body composition in obese women after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a 1-year longitudinal study. Horm Metab Res. 2015;47:873–9. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1555758.
Yu EW, Bouxsein ML, Roy AE, et al. Bone loss after bariatric surgery: discordant results between DXA and QCT bone density. J Bone Miner Res Off J Am Soc Bone Miner Res. 2014;29:542–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.2063.
Weryha G. Conséquences osseuse de la chirurgie bariatrique. Lett Rhumatol 2011:28
Lalmohamed A, de Vries F, Bazelier MT, et al. Risk of fracture after bariatric surgery in the United Kingdom: population based, retrospective cohort study. BMJ. 2012;345:e5085.
Nakamura KM, Haglind EGC, Clowes JA, et al. Fracture risk following bariatric surgery: a population-based study. Osteoporos Int. 2014;25:151–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-013-2463-x.
Lu C-W, Chang Y-K, Chang H-H, et al. Fracture risk after bariatric surgery: a 12-year nationwide cohort study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015;94:e2087. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000002087.
Hsin M-C, Huang C-K, Tai C-M, et al. A case-matched study of the differences in bone mineral density 1 year after 3 different bariatric procedures. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11(1):181 5.
Heber D, Greenway FL, Kaplan LM, et al. Endocrine and nutritional management of the post-bariatric surgery patient: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95:4823–43. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2009-2128.
Luger M, Kruschitz R, Winzer E, et al. Changes in bone mineral density following weight loss induced by one-anastomosis gastric bypass in patients with vitamin D supplementation. Obes Surg. 2018 Jul 2;28:3454–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-3353-2.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
This retrospective study has been performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Formal consent was not required.
Conflict of Interest
Dr. Marion Geoffroy, Dr. Jan Chrusciel, Dr. Isabelle Gaubil-Kaladjian and Dr. Ana Diaz-Cives have no commercial associations that might be a conflict of interest in relation to this article.
Dr. Charlot-Lambrecht reports personal fees from Amgen, outside the submitted work.
Dr. Eschard reports personal fees from Abbvie, personal fees from BMS, personal fees from Janssen, personal fees from Lilly, personal fees from MSD, personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from Pfizer, personal fees from Roche, personal fees from Sanofi, personal fees from UCB, outside the submitted work.
Dr. Salmon reports personal fees from Abbvie, personal fees from BMS, personal fees from Janssen, personal fees from Lilly, personal fees from MSD, personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from Pfizer, personal fees from Roche, personal fees from Sanofi, personal fees from UCB, outside the submitted work.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Geoffroy, M., Charlot-Lambrecht, I., Chrusciel, J. et al. Impact of Bariatric Surgery on Bone Mineral Density: Observational Study of 110 Patients Followed up in a Specialized Center for the Treatment of Obesity in France. OBES SURG 29, 1765–1772 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-019-03719-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-019-03719-5