Abstract
In Brazil, Lycium barbarum L. (goji berry) is an agronomically valuable, imported, commercialized plant. The present study evaluated the effects of cytokinins and light sources on optimization of in vitro multiplication of goji berry by axillary bud proliferation. Nodal explants were excised from plants 90 d after in vitro germination and cultured on Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium containing 30 g L−1 sucrose; 7 g L−1 agar-agar; and 0, 2, 4, 8, or 16 μM 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP), 6-furfurylaminopurine (KIN), or thidiazuron (TDZ). After 60 days, regenerated lateral buds and shoot lengths were evaluated. The regenerated shoots were inoculated in MS supplemented with 0.0, 2.5, 5.0, 10.0, or 20.0 μM BAP under white fluorescent lamps or mixed treatment of red/blue (RB) light-emitting diode (LED) lamps. After 60 days in vitro cultivation, the number of formed shoots, leaf number, and shoot length were determined. Subsequently, the shoots were separated and acclimatized in a greenhouse for 30 d and the percentage of survival was evaluated. High regeneration and shoot numbers during lateral bud regeneration occurred with MS medium plus 4 μM BAP. The estimated optimum concentration of 11.56 μM BAP under RB LED lamp resulted in a high shoot number (8.15), with more average leaves per plant (9.2) at 5 μM BAP, and longer shoots (12.34 cm) at 12.42 μM BAP. Acclimatization was successful with 100% survival of ex vitro plants. An efficient in vitro multiplication protocol of an economically important species, goji berry, was developed to facilitate large-scale commercialization of this species.
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
The fruits of Lycium barbarum L., commonly known as goji berries, are referred to as ‘super-fruits,’ due to their beneficial constituents (Xin et al.2013; Fratianni et al.2018), and are highly valued for their medicinal properties (Lam et al.2016). Some of the prominent therapeutic effects reported for goji berry fruit extracts are antioxidant potential and free radical scavenging (Wu et al.2004), aging prevention (Li et al.2007), antitumor potential (Kulczyński and Gramza-Michałowska 2016), reduction of blood lipids (Pai et al.2013), and reduction of glycemia (Ming et al.2009).
Despite its proven medicinal importance and growing commercial interest, goji berry cultivation remains problematic, because germination is non-uniform, making it difficult to grow new plants with good quality and productivity (Tudor et al.2017). Micropropagation, a common plant tissue culture technique, allows for fast, asexual propagation in a controlled environment (Trigiano and Gray 2016; Al-Khayri and Naik 2017). Likewise, this approach offers the prospect of reducing costs while producing high-quality planting material in countries currently importing goji berry; the five biggest importers in 2014 included the Netherlands, the USA, Hong Kong, Germany, and Brazil.
Published papers indicate protocols exist for in vitro goji berry regeneration from stem fragments (Fira et al.2016), protoplasts (Ratushnyak et al.1989), apical meristems, leaves, roots, calluses, and somatic embryos (Hu et al.2008; Osman et al.2013a; Osman et al.2013b; Dănăilă-Guidea et al.2015). However, there are reports of plantlet hyperhydricity after in vitro regeneration, which increases the difficulty and reduces the chances of successful acclimatization and consequent multiplication (Youlong et al.2008). Among the types of explants used in in vitro propagation, lateral buds can be a viable alternative to maximize production of elite clones, because they have meristematic cells that can be obtained in great amounts from a single plant.
Additionally, previously published reports aiming to optimize goji berry micropropagation only regarded the use of 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP) alone, or in combination with 1-naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA), as plant growth regulators (Dănăilă-Guidea et al.2015; Fira et al.2016). As small changes in plant growth regulator concentrations often have pleiotropic effects, and this hormonal balance determines further developmental pathways of a plant cell (Khan et al.2015), finding the best concentration of different plant growth regulators is necessary to optimize in vitro propagation.
The light source is another relevant factor for in vitro cultivation, since it has great influence on plantlet growth, regeneration, and subsequent acclimatization (Farhadi et al.2017). Light-emitting diodes (LEDs), especially red and blue LEDs, have been proven to promote better plant growth, improved morphogenic response, and increased biosynthesis of volatile compounds, compared with plants grown under white fluorescent lights (Andrade et al.2015; Manivannan et al.2017). The main property of LEDs that produces these increased physiological responses in plants is due to the precise spectrum of light emitted, which can be fitted to the exact requirements of each species and developmental process (Cioć et al.2018). However, studies using LEDs as the main light source during the in vitro cultivation of goji berry have not yet been performed.
Given the above, this present study aimed to evaluate, firstly, the effects of different phytoregulators on bud regeneration and, secondly, the effects of two light sources in order to optimize the in vitro multiplication of goji berry lateral buds.
Goji berry seeds were obtained from Planeta Sementes (Valença, Brazil), collected separately from five elite productive plants with different genotypes. The fruits were selected and allowed to soak in distilled water for 8 h, to facilitate removal of the seeds. A total of 200 seeds were surface-sterilized for 30 s in 200 mL of 70% (v/v) ethanol, followed by immersion for 10 min in 200 mL of 0.1% (w/v) mercuric chloride (HgCl2) (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) solution, according to Hu et al. (2006). Decontaminated seeds were washed thrice with autoclaved distilled water. Thereafter, seeds were inoculated on an induction medium of MS (Murashige and Skoog 1962) basal salts, 30 g L−1 sucrose, and 7 g L−1 agar-agar (Sigma-Aldrich®, St. Louis, MO). The medium pH was adjusted to 5.7 with 2 N NaOH and HCl prior to autoclaving at 121°C and 111.5 kPa, for 20 min. The seeds (25 per plate) were cultured in 90 × 15 mm sterile polystyrene petri dishes (J. Prolab®, São Paulo, Brazil) containing 25 mL aliquots of medium, which were sealed with vinyl polycloret film (Rolopac®, São Paulo, Brazil). During this phase, cultures were maintained under culture room conditions at 25 ± 2°C, with a 16-h photoperiod, and 36 μmol m−2 s−1 irradiance provided by two 20-W fluorescent tubes (Osram, Barueri, Brazil).
After approximately 90 days of culture, 1 cm long nodal explants with a single node were obtained from the in vitro–germinated plants and inoculated onto culture medium composed of MS basal salts, 30 g L−1 sucrose, 7 g L−1 agar-agar, and supplemented with 0.0, 2.0, 4.0, 8.0, or 16.0 μM 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP), 6-furfurylaminopurine (KIN), or thidiazuron (TDZ). After inoculation, the explants were again kept in a growth room at 25 ± 2°C, with a 16-h photoperiod, and 36 μmol m−2 s−1 light intensity, provided by two 20 W fluorescent tubes (Osram).
Each experimental unit (from germinated plants) consisted of 3 nodal explants per 250-mL glass flask (SP Medica®, São Paulo, Brazil); each flask represented one replication, with a total of 15 replicates per treatment, arranged completely at random. After 60 days of in vitro cultivation, the percentage of regenerated buds and the shoot lengths were determined.
To evaluate in vitro multiplication, individualized shoots from regenerated in vitro lateral buds after 90 d of cultivation were used, which had been previously cultured for 15 d on MS culture medium without the presence of growth regulators. After this period, the shoots were standardized at 4.0 cm in length, having 3 nodes, and were inoculated into culture medium containing MS basal salts, 30 g L−1 sucrose, and gelled with 7 g L−1 agar-agar (Sigma-Aldrich®). The treatments consisted of a bifactorial combination of five BAP concentrations (0.0, 2.5, 5.0, 10.0, or 20.0 μM) and two types of light sources: (i) 20-W white fluorescent lamp with a white (400–700 nm) light at 36 μmol m−2 s−1 photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) and (ii) mixed treatment of red LED (peak at 630 nm) and blue LED (peak at 460 nm) (RB LED) with 86 μmol m−2 s−1 PPFD. Both (i) and (ii) light sources were obtained from Osram, Brazil. The spectral distributions in relative energy of the white fluorescent (Fig. 1a) and RB LED (Fig. 1b) lamps were determined with a Model 1400 LI-COR® light quantum meter (LI-COR® Inc., Lincoln, NE). After inoculation, the explants were again kept at a temperature of 25 ± 2°C, with a 16-h photoperiod.
Each experimental unit consisted of 3 shoots (4.0 cm in length with 3 nodes) per glass flask (250 mL, SP Medica®, São Paulo, Brazil), each flask represented one replication, with a total of 30 replicates per treatment, arranged completely at random. The variables evaluated after 60 d of in vitro culture were shoot number per explant, leaf number per shoot, and shoot length.
Regenerated shoots were separated and roots treated with 20 mg L−1 Rootone® (Bayer Crop Science, Durham, NC) (98% total concentration (TC); 1-naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA)), according to Tonkha and Dzyazko (2014). Subsequently, plantlets were transferred to polyethylene pots (500 mL) filled with 500 g of a commercial substrate (Tropstrato®; Genfértil, Campinas, Brazil). The pots were covered with clear plastic bags (NZB PACK, Socorro, Brazil) to maintain high relative humidity at the beginning of acclimatization. The plantlets were grown under a controlled temperature of 27 ± 2°C in a greenhouse and watered daily with 50 mL of distilled water. After 21 days of acclimatization, the plastic bag was opened and then gradually removed, and the percentage of plantlet survival was evaluated.
The experimental design was completely randomized for all experiments and all experimental procedures were repeated three times. Data were submitted to analysis of variance (ANOVA) using the statistical software SISVAR 4.3 (System Analysis of Variance for Balanced Data; Lavras, Brazil), as described by Ferreira (2014). According to the results of the ANOVA, data were compared by Tukey’s test (P < 0.05), or by polynomial regression (P < 0.05).
A significant effect on the regeneration of goji berry lateral buds was observed in MS basal salts supplemented with 4.0 μM BAP, which yielded more than 80% regeneration response (Fig. 2A). In contrast, regeneration response of explants grown with higher concentrations of BAP, KIN, or TDZ leveled off around 40% (Fig. 2a). Additionally, the greatest length of regenerated lateral buds was observed with BAP treatment, where lateral buds were up to 3 times longer than with KIN or TDZ (Fig. 2b).
Since it was demonstrated that BAP resulted in higher regeneration percentage and shoot length of lateral buds, this treatment was selected for the multiplication step. Thus, it was possible to fit a polynomial regression model that describes the number of new shoots according to the BAP concentration in different light sources. Using the equation, it was estimated that, at a concentration of 11.56 μM BAP, a maximum of 8.15 shoots per explant were observed under RB LED illumination (Fig. 3), compared with 11.93 μM BAP with the maximum 4.84 shoots per explant regenerated under white fluorescent lights (Fig. 3). A visual comparison of shoot growth per explant of tissues grown with 10 μM BAP under either white fluorescent (Fig. 6a) or RB LED (Fig. 6b) illumination further supported this finding.
The leaf number of new shoots was also evaluated, considering the two types of light sources; however, this response did not follow a polynomial regression model and each treatment was individually evaluated. Thus, it was determined that all BAP concentrations tested in both light sources resulted in a greater leaf number, when compared with the control (0.0 μM BAP; Fig. 4), although the highest leaf number occurred at 5 μM BAP (9.2 leaves) under RB LED lamp (Fig. 4). Finally, shoot length was evaluated and a polynomial regression model was fitted to each light source (Fig. 5). By applying the equation, it was possible to determine that the BAP concentration of 12.42 μM yielded the highest shoot length (12.34 cm) under a RB LED lamp, representing a 64% shoot length increase found with RB LEDs, compared with 13.97 μM BAP yielding 7.53-cm-long shoots under white fluorescent lamps (Fig. 5).
After this multiplication period, 100% of the individualized plantlets (established under either light condition) that were transferred to greenhouse conditions for acclimatization presented leaves and roots (Fig. 6c).
This study provided results about the regeneration of lateral buds in response to different types and concentrations of cytokinins and optimized in vitro shoot multiplication rate with various BAP concentrations under RB LEDs in goji berry.
The results presented here were in agreement with previous findings that BAP-supplemented medium proved to be effective for the in vitro multiplication of goji berry, as the explants exhibited high proliferation rates and well-developed plantlets (Fira et al.2016). Nevertheless, evaluating the additional cytokinins TDZ or KIN was necessary for assurance of protocol optimization. White fluorescent lamps are often used to provide controlled radiation to plants grown in vitro; however, this kind of lamp emits light deficient in red wavelengths, which can be detrimental to the growth of plants (Al-Mayahi 2016). Therefore, care must be taken to provide a suitable spectral balance for culture growth (Al-Mayahi 2016). Light-emitting diodes have numerous additional advantages over conventional lamps, including low-power requirement, determined spectral composition, small size and mass, durability, wavelength specificity, and cool emitting surfaces (Gupta and Jatothu 2013). As a result, LEDs have emerged as a novel and efficient light source for promoting plant growth, reducing manufacturing costs, and expanding the scope for their application in commercial micropropagation (Gupta and Jatothu 2013).
The effects of LED system as a monochromatic, monochromatic and dichromatic, source on various aspects of plant health have been reported for several plant species grown under in vitro conditions, such as, Vaccinium corymbosum L. micropropagation (Hung et al.2016), Vitis vinifera L. (grape) transcription levels (Li et al.2017), Peucedanum japonicum Thunb. (Chen et al.2016) and Saccharum spp. (sugarcane) somatic embryogenesis (Ferreira et al.2017), Lupinus angustifolius L. early flowering (Croser et al.2016), and Lippia alba (Mill.) N.E.Br. ex Britton & P.Wilson essential oil profile (Batista et al.2016).
The spectral quality of lights is expressed by the relative intensity and quantity of different wavelengths emitted by a light source and perceived by photoreceptors within a plant (Lin et al.2013). In the current study, an increase of 68% in shoot number, 41% in leaf number, and 64% in shoot length was observed under RB LED lamps, compared with white fluorescent lamps. This showed that the intensity and quantity of the different wavelengths emitted by the RB LED lamp were better adjusted to promote goji berry explant growth than those of the white fluorescent lamp, and thus lead to the increased development of new shoots.
In Vaccinium corymbosum, using blue LED promoted accumulation of chlorophyll, while red LED reversed this effect (Hung et al.2016). When using LED as a monochromatic source for grape plantlets, the isolated exposure to blue LED resulted in lower biomass, foliar area, and height, which was associated with reduced expression of the auxin-repressed protein gene, and increase in the carboxypeptidase serine protein (Li et al.2017). Since blue and red spectra are required for chlorophyll synthesis and foliar growth, respectively, the combination of both spectra in a suitable proportion is important to obtain better plant growth and development results (Gupta and Jatothu 2013).
Axillary bud branching is another photomorphogenically controlled response preferentially accelerated by red LED light (Hung et al.2016). Thus, although the accumulation of chlorophyll is important for the interception of radiation as mentioned, red LED lights, with wavelengths greater than those of the B LEDs, act in a complementary way during budding. Taken together, this evidence might help explain the greater shoot number and larger growth of these shoots formed under RB LED lamps (Figs. 3 and 5).
The acclimatization phase of in vitro–regenerated shoots is of great importance for a successful in vitro regeneration protocol. In this current study, the regulatory role of LEDs in modulating the metabolism of reactive oxygen species (ROS) by different LED lighting regimes, as reported by Gupta and Agarwal (2017), may have provided a basis for enhancing in vitro plant growth and increasing acclimatization survival.
Compared with reports by Fira et al. (2016), where the goji berry multiplication rate was 15.46 shoots per explant (regarding 1.5 to 2 cm long shoots), the present work maximized the multiplication to 58.17 to 77.56 shoots per explant. This represents at least a 32.4 to 76.5% multiplication rate increase, compared with the previous work. Another point to bear in mind is that Fira et al. (2016) achieved the multiplication rate from 4-node explants, while, here, in the current investigation, 3-node explants were inoculated.
The present study successfully developed an efficient in vitro multiplication protocol of economically important cultivars of goji berry, using a combination of optimal BAP concentration and RB LED illumination, to facilitate the large-scale commercialization of this species.
References
Al-Khayri JM, Naik PM (2017) Date palm micropropagation: advances and applications. Ciênc agrotec 41:347–358
Al-Mayahi AMW (2016) Effect of red and blue light emitting diodes “CRB-LED” on in vitro organogenesis of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) cv. Alshakr. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 32:160–168
Andrade HB, Braga AF, Bertolucci SKV, Hsie BS, Silva ST, Pinto JEBP (2015) Effect of plant growth regulators, light intensity and LED on growth and volatile compound of Hyptis suaveolens (L.) Poit in vitro plantlets. Acta Hortic 1155:277–284
Batista DS, Castro KM, Silva AR, Teixeira ML, Sales TA, Soares LI, Otoni WC (2016) Light quality affects in vitro growth and essential oil profile in Lippia alba (Verbenaceae). In Vitro Cell Dev Biol - Plant 52:276–282
Chen CC, Agrawal DC, Lee MR, Lee RJ, Kuo CL, Wu CR, Chang HC (2016) Influence of LED light spectra on in vitro somatic embryogenesis and LC-MS analysis of chlorogenic acid and rutin in Peucedanum japonicum Thunb.: a medicinal herb. Bot Stud 57:1–9
Cioć M, Szewczyk A, Żupnik M, Kalisz A, Pawłowska B (2018) LED lighting affects plant growth, morphogenesis and phytochemical contents of Myrtus communis L. in vitro. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 132:433–447
Croser JS, Pazos-Navarro M, Bennett RG, Tschirren S, Edwards K, Erskine W, Ribalta FM (2016) Time to flowering of temperate pulses in vivo and generation turnover in vivo–in vitro of narrow-leaf lupin accelerated by low red to far-red ratio and high intensity in the far-red region. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 127:591–599
Dănăilă-Guidea S-M, Dobrinoiu R-V, Vişan L, Toma RC (2015) Protocol for efficient in vitro multiplication of Lycium barbarum L. (goji) by direct organogenesis. Sci Bull Series F Biotechnol 19:34–38
Farhadi N, Panahandeh J, Azar AM, Salte SA (2017) Effects of explant type, growth regulators and light intensity on callus induction and plant regeneration in four ecotypes of Persian shallot (Allium hirtifolium). Sci Hortic 218:80–86
Ferreira DF (2014) Sisvar: a guide for its bootstrap procedures in multiple comparisons. Ciênc agrotec 38:109–112
Ferreira LT, Silva MMD, Ulisses C, Camara TR, Willadino L (2017) Using LED lighting in somatic embryogenesis and micropropagation of an elite sugarcane variety and its effect on redox metabolism during acclimatization. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 128:211–221
Fira A, Joshee N, Cristea V, Simu M, Hârța M, Pamfil D, Clapa D (2016) Optimization of micropropagation protocol for goji berry (Lycium barbarum L.). Bull UASVM Horticulture 3:141–150
Fratianni A, Niro S, Alam MDR, Cinquanta L, Di Matteo M, Adiletta G, Panfili G (2018) Effect of a physical pre-treatment and drying on carotenoids of goji berries (Lycium barbarum L.). LWT 92:318–323
Gupta SD, Agarwal A (2017) Influence of LED lighting on in vitro plant regeneration and associated cellular redox balance. In: Gupta SD (ed) Light emitting diodes for agriculture. Springer, Singapore, pp 273–303
Gupta SD, Jatothu B (2013) Fundamentals and applications of light-emitting diodes (LEDs) in in vitro plant growth and morphogenesis. Plant Biotech Rep 7:211–220
Hu Z, Hu Y, Gao HH, Guan XQ, Zhuang DH (2008) Callus production, somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration of Lycium barbarum root explants. Biol Plant 52:93–96
Hu Z, Wu YR, Li W, Gao HH (2006) Factors affecting Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated genetic transformation of Lycium barbarum L. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol - Plant 42:461–466
Hung CD, Hong CH, Kim SK, Lee KH, Park JY, Nam MW, Lee HI (2016) LED light for in vitro and ex vitro efficient growth of economically important highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum L.). Acta Physiol Plant 38:1–9
Khan N, Ahmed M, Hafiz I, Abbasi N, Ejaz S, Anjum M (2015) Optimizing the concentrations of plant growth regulators for in vitro shoot cultures, callus induction and shoot regeneration from calluses of grapes. OENO One 49:37–45
Kulczyński B, Gramza-Michałowska A (2016) Goji berry (Lycium barbarum): composition and health effects–a review. Pol J Food Nutr Sci 66:67–76
Lam SC, Luo Z, Wu DT, Cheong KL, Hu DJ, Xia ZM, Li SP (2016) Comparison and characterization of compounds with antioxidant activity in Lycium barbarum using high-performance thin layer chromatography coupled with DPPH bioautography and tandem mass spectrometry. J Food Sci 81:1378–1384
Li CX, Xu ZG, Dong RQ, Chang SX, Wang LZ, Khalil-Ur-Rehman M, Tao JM (2017) An RNA-seq analysis of grape plantlets grown in vitro reveals different responses to blue, green, red LED light, and white fluorescent light. Front Plant Sci 8:1–16
Li XM, Ma YL, Liu XJ (2007) Effect of the Lycium barbarum polysaccharides on age-related oxidative stress in aged mice. J Ethnopharmacol 111:504–511
Lin KH, Huang MY, Huang WD, Hsu MH, Yang ZW, Yang CM (2013) The effects of red, blue, and white light-emitting diodes on the growth, development, and edible quality of hydroponically grown lettuce (Lactuca sativa L. var. capitata). Sci Hortic 150:86–91
Manivannan A, Soundararajan P, Park YG, We H, Kim S, Jeong BR (2017) Blue and red light-emitting diodes improve the growth and physiology of in vitro-grown carnations ‘Green Beauty’ and ‘Purple Beauty. Hortic Environ Biotechnol 58:12–20
Ming M, Guanhua L, Zhanhai Y, Guang C, Xuan Z (2009) Effect of the Lycium barbarum polysaccharides administration on blood lipid metabolism and oxidative stress of mice fed high-fat diet in vivo. Food Chem 113:872–877
Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–497
Osman NI, Awal A, Sidik NJ, Abdullah S (2013a) Callus induction and somatic embryogenesis from leaf and nodal explants of Lycium barbarum L. (goji). Biotech 12:36–45
Osman NI, Awal A, Sidik NJ, Abdullah S (2013b) In vitro regeneration and antioxidant properties of Lycium barbarum L. (goji). J Teknol (Sciences & Engineering) 62:35–38
Pai PG, Habeeba PU, Ullal S, Shoeb PA, Pradeepti MS, Ramya K (2013) Evaluation of hypolipidemic effects of Lycium barbarum (goji berry) in a murine model. J Nat Remedies 13:4–8
Ratushnyak YI, Piven NM, Rudas VA (1989) Protoplast culture and plant regeneration in Lycium barbarum L. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 17:183–190
Tonkha OL, Dzyazko YS (2014) Soils and plant roots. In: Volfkovich YM, Filippov AN, Bagotsky VS (eds) Structural properties of porous materials and powders used in different fields of science and technology. Springer, London, UK, pp 221–249
Trigiano RN, Gray DJ (2016) Plant tissue culture, development, and biotechnology. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL
Tudor V, Asănică A, Teodorescu RI, Gidea M, Tănăsescu C, Tudor AD, Țiu JV (2017) Germination capacity of some Lycium barbarum L. and Lycium chinense Mill. biotypes seeds. Rom Biotechnol Lett 22:12191–12196
Wu SJ, Ng LT, Lin CC (2004) Antioxidant activities of some common ingredients of traditional Chinese medicine, Angelica sinensis, Lycium barbarum and Poriacocos. Phytother Res 18:1008–1012
Xin T, Yao H, Gao H, Zhou X, Ma X, Xu C, Song J (2013) Super food Lycium barbarum (Solanaceae) traceability via an internal transcribed spacer 2 barcode. Food Res Int 54:1699–1704
Youlong C, Qing L, Xiyan Z, Xiaoying L (2008) Effects of different culture conditions on vitrification of Lycium barbarum L. plantlets in tissue culture. J Agric Sci Technol 9:30–32
Funding
The authors are grateful to the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq; Brasília, DF—Brazil), Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG; Belo Horizonte, MG—Brazil), and Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES; Brasília, DF—Brazil) for financial support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Editor: Wagner Campos Otoni
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
de Oliveira Prudente, D., de Souza, L.B., Paiva, R. et al. Goji berry (Lycium barbarum L.) in vitro multiplication improved by light-emitting diodes (LEDs) and 6-benzylaminopurine. In Vitro Cell.Dev.Biol.-Plant 55, 258–264 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-019-09970-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-019-09970-w