Abstract
Introduction
Perforation of the colon is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Pathologies arising from the right colon differ greatly between Asians and the Western population. The aims of our study were to evaluate the implications of perforated right colon in an Asian population and to identify factors that could predict the perioperative outcome.
Methods
A retrospective review of all patients who underwent operative intervention for peritonitis from right colonic perforation from July 2003 to April 2008 was performed. Patients were identified from the hospital’s diagnostic index and operating records. The severity of abdominal sepsis for all patients was graded using the Mannheim peritonitis index (MPI). All the complications were graded according to the classification proposed by Clavian and colleagues.
Results
Fifty-one patients with a median age of 60 years (range, 22–93 years) formed the study group. Diverticulitis (47.1%) and malignancy (37.3%) accounted for the majority of the pathologies. Right hemicolectomy without diverting stoma (n = 34, 66.7%) was performed most commonly. Of our patients, 74.5% had perioperative morbidity with 19 (37.3%) patients having grade III or worse complications. In our series, five (9.8%) patients died. On univariate analysis, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score ≥3, ≥2 premorbid conditions, raised MPI, raised creatinine, and stoma creation were related to more severe complications (grade III/IV). The following variables were correlated with in-hospital mortality: ASA score ≥3, raised MPI, hematocrit <33%, raised creatinine, malignant perforation, and stoma creation. On multivariate analysis, a higher ASA score ≥3 was predictive of significant morbidity, while both malignant perforation and stoma creation were associated with mortality.
Conclusion
Diverticulitis is the commonest cause of right colonic perforation in Asians. Patients with higher ASA score and malignant perforation are at risk of higher morbidity and mortality. Resection with primary anastomosis is safe and patients who require stomas are more likely to do worse.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Perforation of the colon is a serious abdominal emergency. The commonest causes include malignancy and diverticulitis.1,2 The operative mortality and morbidity in these patients remain significant despite advances in surgical techniques and perioperative care.1,2
Most of the published literature on the consequences of perforation of the colon has focused on the left colon due to the high incidence of diverticulitis and malignancy in the descending and sigmoid colon in the Western population.3 However, numerous studies have shown that pathologies in the right colon differ significantly between Asians and the Western population.4,5
Colonic diverticulosis in Asians is more commonly confined in the right and in young adults.5 This preponderance has been postulated to be genetically linked. This is in stark contrast to the Western population where diverticular disease is deemed an acquired disease affecting mostly the sigmoid and descending colon, with less common involvement of the cecum and ascending colon.6
Furthermore, the incidence of right-sided colon cancer was shown to be markedly lower in Asians compared to Whites and African Americans.7 This phenomenon has also been attributed to genetic risk factors or other uncharacterized carcinogens.
In addition, while the appropriate surgical technique (Hartmann’s procedure versus primary resection with/without diverting stoma) in handling left-sided colonic perforation is not firmly established despite extensive discussion,3 the literature reviewing the need for a stoma in right-sided colonic perforation is lacking.
Thus, in view of the numerous unresolved issues surrounding perforation of the right colon, the primary aim of this study was to review the treatment and early outcome of patients who underwent emergency surgery for right colonic perforation. In addition, factors that might predict morbidity and mortality were also evaluated.
Methods
Study Population
Tan Tock Seng Hospital is a 1,300-bed hospital, the second largest in Singapore, and provides secondary and tertiary medical care for about 1.5 million people. A retrospective review of all patients who underwent operative intervention for peritonitis from right colonic perforation from July 2003 to April 2008 was performed. Patients were identified from the hospital’s diagnostic index and operating records. Right-sided pathologies were regarded if it was located from the cecum till the transverse colon. Patients who suffered perforated colonic injuries from abdominal trauma were excluded.
The data collected included age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, comorbid conditions, presenting signs and symptoms, and clinical parameters. Laboratory values, including full blood count and renal panel, were also recorded. In addition, duration from symptoms to surgery, duration from admission to surgery, operative findings and interventions, length of surgery, perioperative complications, mortality, and length of hospital stay were also documented.
The severity of abdominal sepsis for all patients was graded using the Mannheim peritonitis index (MPI; Table 1) with a score of >26 being defined as severe.8 Classification of diverticulitis was assessed using Hinchey’s classification,9 and all colorectal cancers were staged according to the guidelines of the American Joint Committee of Cancer.10 The grades of complications (GOC) were in concordance with the classification proposed by Clavian and colleagues (Table 2).11–13
Statistical analysis was performed using both univariate and multivariate analyses. The variables were analyzed to the various outcomes using Fisher’s exact test, and their odds ratio and 95% confidence interval were also reported. For the multivariate analysis, the logistic regression model was applied. All analyses were performed using the SPSS 13.0 statistical package (Chicago, IL, USA) and all p values reported are two-sided, and p values of <0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Results
During the study period, 51 patients underwent surgery for perforation of the right colon. The median age of the study group was 60 years (range, 22–93 years). There were more females (n = 28, 54.9%) in the study group and the majority of patients had an ASA score of 2 or 3 (n = 39, 76.5%). Hypertension (n = 22, 43.1%) was the commonest comorbid condition, with 23.5% having at least two comorbid conditions. There were four (7.8%) patients who were immunosuppressed from either chronic corticosteroid consumption (n = 3) or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection.
A total of 30 (58.8%) patients underwent preoperative computed tomographic (CT) scans before surgery, while the remaining 21 (41.2%) were operated after clinical assessment and may be assisted by the associated chest and/or abdominal X-rays. Table 3 illustrates the various characteristics of this study group.
Operative Findings
As shown in Table 4, diverticulitis accounted for majority of the perforations in 24 (47.1%) patients, with malignancy in another 19 (37.3%). Ten of these patients had perforation at the tumor site, while the other nine had perforation of the right colon due to a distal obstructing tumor. Some of the other causes included ischemic colitis (n = 3, 5.9%), severe appendicitis causing cecal perforation (n = 4, 7.8%) and tuberculosis (n = 1, 2.0%).
The commonest site of perforation was at the cecum (n = 30, 58.8%), followed by the ascending colon (11, 21.6%; Table 4). The median MPI score was 15 (0–37), with 10 (19.6%) patients having a score of >26. There were a total of 36 (70.6%) colonic anastomoses for which 32 (88.9%) were stapled, with the remaining four (11.1%) handsewn. Right hemicolectomy without diverting stoma (n = 34, 66.7%) was performed most commonly while ileocolic resection with stoma was created in 14 (27.5%) patients. Of these 14 patients, only one had perforated diverticulitis, while the rest had either malignant perforation (n = 8) or ischemic colitis (n = 3). The time from symptoms or admission to surgery and the median duration of surgery were also described in Table 4.
Outcome
Significant proportion (74.5%) of our patients had associated perioperative morbidity, with 19 (37.3%) of them having GOC III or worse complications (Table 4). The majority of these arose from respiratory and wound complications. Five (9.8%) patients died in our series. There was no patient with postoperative anastomotic leak, but there was one patient with ischemic stoma that necessitated revision. The median length of stay was 8 days (range, 3–141 days).
Analysis—Complications
Worse complications (GOC III or IV) occurred more commonly in patients who had a higher ASA score (3–4), ≥2 premorbid conditions, MPI >26, raised preoperative creatinine levels, and in patients who had stoma created. Factors such as age, gender, site, and pathology of perforation were not shown to be significant. Duration from symptoms or admission to surgery and the median duration of surgery were also not related. ASA score was the only independent variable related to significant morbidity (GOC III or IV) after multivariate analysis (Table 5).
Analysis—Mortality
Mortality from perforated right colon was more likely in patients who had a higher ASA score (3–4), higher MPI, lower hematocrit (<33.0%), and raised preoperative urea and creatinine levels. Malignant perforation and creation of stoma were the only independent variables associated with higher mortality after multivariate analysis (Table 6).
Comparison—Malignancy Versus Diverticulitis
Patients with malignant perforation were older and had a higher ASA score compared to those with perforated diverticulitis. Lower white blood cell and hematocrit were also associated with malignant perforation. Factors such as MPI, site of perforation, and the grading of complications were not associated. Lower hematocrit was the only independent variable predictive for malignancy after multivariate analysis. However, patients with malignant perforation were more likely to have stoma created and perish from their conditions (Table 7).
Comparison—Stoma Versus No Stoma
Creation of stoma was more likely in patients with higher ASA scores and raised creatinine level. Both higher MPI and low hematocrit were the only independent variables associated with stoma creation. Patients with stoma also fared worse than those without (Table 8).
Discussion
Even though our series showed that diverticulitis and malignancy are responsible for majority of right colonic perforation, the distribution is vastly different compared to the West. Malignant perforation accounted for the majority of right colonic perforation in the West, while diverticulitis is the main pathology in our series.2,14 This has been attributed to the genetic differences between Asians and the Western population.5–7
In the acute setting, differentiation between malignant and diverticular-related perforation is difficult and may only be evident after resection. Some of the differences between the two groups included advanced age and higher ASA score in malignant perforation. This is not surprising as cancer patients are typically older and associated with more premorbid conditions, while right-sided diverticular disease are more common in younger Asians. Another important clue that our series highlighted was that lower hematocrit of <33.0% was more suggestive of malignant perforation.
Hinchey classification has often been used to predict operative intervention and the associated morbidity and mortality.9,15 In our series, patients with Hinchey III and IV (four out of nine patients) had more severe complications than patients with Hinchey II (two out of 15 patients). While the ideal surgical procedure for perforated left colonic diverticulitis remains controversial, our series showed that right hemicolectomy with primary anastomosis (23 out of 24 patients, 95.8%) for perforated right colonic diverticulitis was associated with good outcome and minimal complications.16,17
Perforation in colorectal cancers occurs due to either direct perforation from tumor necrosis or proximally to an obstructing tumor from a resultant closed-loop syndrome. Recent data has suggested that factors such as perforation proximal to the cancer and number of metastatic lymph nodes were associated with higher perioperative morbidity and mortality.18–20 In our series, though there were no differences seen in the perioperative outcome between patients who had proximal or tumor site perforation, this could be because of our small numbers.
Mortality rate from perforated colorectal cancers has been reported to be over 40%.20,21 In our series, the mortality rate was 26.3%. Similar to other studies, the majority of our malignant perforations were either stage 3 or stage 4. Furthermore, malignant perforation has been shown to be associated with an increased risk of local recurrence and carcinomatosis peritonei.22,23 In these patients, apart from managing the peritoneal contamination and the resultant septicemia, complete oncologic surgery should be attempted to offer the best long-term outcome, but only if the patient’s condition allows.
ASA score has been used for decades and is highly predictive of morbidity and mortality in surgical patients.24–26 In our series, a higher ASA score was the only independent variable predicting severe complications. However, ASA score has been criticized for its failure to include the impact of numerous comorbidities and age. Though our patients with two or more comorbid conditions were associated with worse complications, an increased age did not have a similar relationship. It has been shown in many studies that chronological age is not an independent predictor, but it is logical to deduce that patients who are older are more likely to have more comorbid conditions and a higher ASA score.27,28
The severity of peritonitis, and not the surgical procedure or the underlying diagnoses, has also been shown to be directly accountable for the surgical outcome;2,29–30 however, these data were predominantly based on left colonic pathologies in the Western population.29 In our series, MPI was used as it is easy to apply, can be used for all diagnoses, and is able to prognosticate the patients according to the severity of the peritonitis.2,8,29,30 To our knowledge, MPI has never been used for right-sided colonic perforation in an Asian population. Our series concurred with the others that a higher MPI is associated with stoma creation, severe complications, and death.2,8,29,30 Some of its criticisms included the difficulty in determining the exact timing from perforation to operation and the neglect of patients’ hemodynamic and physiological derangement.31 Nonetheless, even though our series supported the usage of MPI in patients with colonic perforation, a prospective study would be required to further validate its usefulness in Asians.
Though emergency resection for right-sided colonic pathologies has been shown to be technically easier, it still carries an overall morbidity of up to 44%.32,33 The method of anastomosis, be it handsewn or stapled, has not been shown to be significantly related to the development of an anastomotic leak or other complications in emergency right hemicolectomy.33–35 This is supported in our series as there was no patient with primary anastomosis from either method that had any anastomotic complications. In addition, right colectomy is associated with a lower rate of anastomotic leakage compared to colocolic or colorectal anastomosis, especially in the presence of an unprepared colon.36–38
In our series, stoma was created more often in patients with more severe peritoneal contamination. Patients who required stoma also had worse perioperative outcome. This is not surprising, as diverting stoma has always been advocated in patients who are hemodynamically unstable or in those who are suspected to fare worse.3,16 However, as the morbidity rate from the complications of a diverting stoma is not negligible,32,39,40 the authors opined that the optimal choice of surgical intervention should remain at the discretion of the primary surgeon with paramount considerations given to the general condition of the patient and degree of contamination.
As with most studies, there were several limitations in the present study. This series of patients was enrolled from a single institution and any retrospective study has inherent flaws. Even though our study is the largest series in the literature analyzing the consequences of right colonic perforation in an Asian population, the sample size is still very small with only 51 patients. This may mask several other important factors that could be accountable for the outcomes measured. More importantly, there were no standard guidelines or protocol in our institution governing the indications of surgery and the ideal operative techniques to adopt in right colonic perforation with special considerations given to the degree of peritoneal contamination and the patient’s general condition. In addition, patients that were managed conservatively for right colonic perforations were not included in our series as our focus was to uncover factors that could predict perioperative outcome.
Although these limitations are significant, this study remains important in highlighting the various issues pertinent in right colonic perforation that are considerably different and rarely seen in the Western population. Our study also identified various factors that could be predictive of a worse perioperative outcome after surgical resection for right colonic perforation.
Conclusions
Diverticulitis is the commonest cause of right colonic perforation in Asians. Anemia is predictive of a malignant perforation in these patients. Patients with higher ASA score and malignant perforation are at risk of higher morbidity and mortality. Resection with primary anastomosis is safe in the majority, and patients who require stomas are more likely to do worse.
References
Nespoli A, Ravizzini C, Trivella M, Segala M. The choice of surgical procedure for peritonitis due to colonic perforation. Arch Surg 1993;128(7):814–818.
Bielecki K, Kamiński P, Klukowski M. Large bowel perforation: morbidity and mortality. Tech Coloproctol 2002;6(3):177–182.
Breitenstein S, Kraus A, Hahnloser D, Decurtins M, Clavien PA, Demartines N. Emergency left colon resection for acute perforation: primary anastomosis or Hartmann’s procedure? A case-matched control study. World J Surg. 2007;31(11):2117–2124.
Lee YS. Diverticular disease of the large bowel in Singapore: an autopsy survey. Dis Colon Rectum. 1986;29(5):330–335.
Sugihara K, Muto T, Morioka Y, Asano A, Yamamoto T. Diverticular disease of the colon in Japan. A review of 615 cases. Dis Colon Rectum. 1984;27(8):531–537.
Schoetz DJ Jr. Diverticular disease of the colon: a century-old problem. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;42:703–709.
Wu X, Chen VW, Martin J, Roffers S, Groves FD, Correa CN, Hamilton-Byrd E, Jemal A. Subsite-specific colorectal cancer incidence rates and stage distributions among Asians and Pacific Islanders in the United States, 1995 to 1999. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2004;13(7):1215–1222.
Billing A, Fröhlich D, Schildberg FW. Prediction of outcome using the Mannheim peritonitis index in 2003 patients. Peritonitis Study Group. Br J Surg. 1994;81(2):209–213.
Hinchey EJ, Schaal PGH, Richards GK. Treatment of perforated diverticular disease of the colon. Adv Surg. 1978;12:85–109.
American Joint Committee on Cancer. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 6th ed. Berlin: Springer, 2002.
Clavien PA, Sanabria JR, Mentha G, Borst F, Buhler L, Roche B, Cywes R, Tibshirani R, Rohner A, Strasberg SM. Recent results of elective open cholecystectomy in a North American and a European center. Comparison of complications and risk factors. Ann Surg. 1992;216(6):618–626.
Clavien PA, Camargo CA Jr, Croxford R, Langer B, Levy GA, Greig PD. Definition and classification of negative outcomes in solid organ transplantation. Application in liver transplantation. Ann Surg. 1994;220(2):109–120.
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205–213.
Kriwanek S, Armbruster C, Beckerhinn P, Dittrich K. Prognostic factors for survival in colonic perforation. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1994;9(3):158–162.
Antolovic D, Reissfelder C, Koch M, Mertens B, Schmidt J, Büchler MW, Weitz J. Surgical treatment of sigmoid diverticulitis—analysis of predictive risk factors for postoperative infections, surgical complications, and mortality. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2009;24(5):577–584.
Constantinides VA, Heriot A, Remzi F, Darzi A, Senapati A, Fazio VW, Tekkis PP. Operative strategies for diverticular peritonitis: a decision analysis between primary resection and anastomosis versus Hartmann’s procedures. Ann Surg. 2007;245(1):94–103.
Salem L, Flum DR. Primary anastomosis or Hartmann’s procedure for patients with diverticular peritonitis? A systematic review. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47(11):1953–1964.
Carraro PG, Segala M, Orlotti C, Tiberio G. Outcome of large-bowel perforation in patients with colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 1998;41(11):1421–1426.
Khan S, Pawlak SE, Eggenberger JC, Lee CS, Szilagy EJ, Margolin DA. Acute colonic perforation associated with colorectal cancer. Am Surg. 2001;67(3):261–264.
Runkel NS, Schlag P, Schwarz V, Herfarth C. Outcome after emergency surgery for cancer of the large intestine. Br J Surg. 1991;78(2):183–188.
Kriwanek S, Armbruster C, Dittrich K, Beckerhinn P. Perforated colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;39(12):1409–1414.
Willett C, Tepper JE, Cohen A, Orlow E, Welch C. Obstructive and perforative colonic carcinoma: patterns of failure. J Clin Oncol. 1985;3(3):379–384.
Obrand DI, Gordon PH. Incidence and patterns of recurrence following curative resection for colorectal carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum. 1997;40(1):15–24.
Biondo S, Ramos E, Deiros M, Ragué JM, De Oca J, Moreno P, Farran L, Jaurrieta E. Prognostic factors for mortality in left colonic peritonitis: a new scoring system. J Am Coll Surg. 2000;191(6):635–642.
Anwar MA, D’Souza F, Coulter R, Memon B, Khan IM, Memon MA. Outcome of acutely perforated colorectal cancers: experience of a single district general hospital. Surg Oncol. 2006;15(2):91–96.
Longo WE, Virgo KS, Johnson FE, Oprian CA, Vernava AM, Wade TP, Phelan MA, Henderson WG, Daley J, Khuri SF. Risk factors for morbidity and mortality after colectomy for colon cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43(1):83–91.
Gurevitch AJ, Davidovitch B, Kashtan H. Outcome of right colectomy for cancer in octogenarians. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13(1):100–104.
Basili G, Lorenzetti L, Biondi G, Preziuso E, Angrisano C, Carnesecchi P, Roberto E, Goletti O. Colorectal cancer in the elderly. Is there a role for safe and curative surgery? ANZ J Surg. 2008;78(6):466–470.
Biondo S, Ramos E, Fraccalvieri D, Kreisler E, Ragué JM, Jaurrieta E. Comparative study of left colonic Peritonitis Severity Score and Mannheim Peritonitis Index. Br J Surg. 2006;93(5):616–622.
Kologlu M, Elker D, Altun H, Sayek I. Validation of MPI and PIA II in two different groups of patients with secondary peritonitis. Hepatogastroenterology 2001;48(37):147–151.
Shinkawa H, Yasuhara H, Naka S, Yanagie H, Nojiri T, Furuya Y, Ariki K, Niwa H. Factors affecting the early mortality of patients with nontraumatic colorectal perforation. Surg Today. 2003;33(1):13–17.
Miller FB, Nikolov NR, Garrison RN. Emergency right colon resection. Arch Surg. 1987;122:339–343.
Wyrzykowski AD, Feliciano DV, George TA, Tremblay LN, Rozycki GS, Murphy TW, Dente CJ. Emergent right hemicolectomies. Am Surg. 2005;71(8):653–656.
Lee YM, Law WL, Chu KW, Poon RT. Emergency surgery for obstructing colorectal cancers: a comparison between right-sided and left-sided lesions. J Am Coll Surg 2001;192(6):719–725.
Hsu TC. Comparison of one-stage resection and anastomosis of acute complete obstruction of left and right colon. Am J Surg. 2005;189(4):384–387.
Veyrie N, Ata T, Muscari F, Couchard AC, Msika S, Hay JM, Fingerhut A, Dziri C. Anastomotic leakage after elective right versus left colectomy for cancer: prevalence and independent risk factors. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;05(6):785–793.
Konishi T, Watanabe T, Kishimoto J, Nagawa H. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after surgery for colorectal cancer: results of prospective surveillance. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;202(3):439–444.
Lipska MA, Bissett IP, Parry BR, Merrie AE. Anastomotic leakage after lower gastrointestinal anastomosis: men are at a higher risk. ANZ J Surg. 2006;76(7):579–585.
Duchesne JC, Wang YZ, Weintraub SL, Boyle M, Hunt JP. Stoma complications: a multivariate analysis. Am Surg. 2002;68:961–966.
Arumugam PJ, Bevan L, Macdonald L, Watkins AJ, Morgan AR, Beynon J, Carr ND. A prospective audit of stomas—analysis of risk factors and complications and their management. Colorectal Dis 2003;5(1):49–52.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tan, KK., Zhang, J., Liu, J.Z. et al. Right Colonic Perforation in an Asian Population: Predictors of Morbidity and Mortality. J Gastrointest Surg 13, 2252–2259 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-009-0986-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-009-0986-4