Abstract
The widely held dogma of three physiological narrowings in the upper urinary tract has proven incorrect by recent several studies using computed tomography images. There are only two common obstruction sites: the upper ureter and the ureterovesical junction. The second narrowing, where the ureter crosses the iliac vessels, cannot be regarded anymore as a common obstruction site. The mechanism by which stones lodge in the upper ureter is explained anatomically by the change in ureteral mobility and compliance at the level where the ureter exits the perirenal space. This level can be identified radiologically as the point where the ureter crosses under the ipsilateral gonadal veins, termed the “crossing point”. Kinking of the upper ureter is another manifestation of this anatomical phenomenon, visible in radiological images. It is caused by loosening of the ureter at or above the crossing point (within the perirenal space), corresponding with renal descent such as during the inspiratory phase. This new anatomical discovery in the retroperitoneum will not only bring about a paradigm shift in terms of the physiological narrowings in the upper urinary tract, but may also lead to the development of new surgical concepts and approaches in the area.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Most doctors have learned in their medical-school days that there are three physiological narrowings in the upper urinary tract. However, with the development of medical imaging technologies and its application in the field of clinical anatomy, this widely held dogma has recently proven false.
In this review, we first summarize the conventional anatomical concept of the upper urinary tract. Thereafter, we present the renewed concept of upper urinary-tract narrowings, in light of recently discovered anatomical facts concerning the retroperitoneum. Finally, we explain the significance of this novel concept from radiological and clinical aspects.
Conventional concept
“The ureter is naturally narrowed at the ureteropelvic junction, at the iliac vessel crossover, and at the ureterovesical junction” [1], “The ureters are constricted at the ureteropelvic junction, pelvic inlet, and bladder entrance” [2]. These are not the only textbooks to describe physiological narrowings in the upper urinary tract; such descriptions can be found in every textbook of anatomy, surgery, or urology [3,4,5]. This description dates back to the textbook, “Urology,” published in 1954 [6], which was not accompanied by a reference (Fig. 1).
Ever since, it has become dogma, taught to medical students and other medical professionals without being verified scientifically.
Renewed concept
Thanks to considerable advancements in medical imaging technologies such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging, detailed, three-dimensional information can now be obtained from a living individual without direct observation of organs and tissues. This dramatic development in radiological imaging has greatly contributed, of course, to quality improvements in clinical practice; still further, it enables the discovery of new anatomical structures that would have been difficult to recognize using conventional anatomical approaches.
In 2009, Eisner et al. [7] located ureteral stones in patients with renal colic at an emergency department, using CT images. They revealed that there were only two peak sites of stone locations in the upper urinary tract: the upper ureter and the ureterovesical junction (UVJ). The level where the ureter crosses the iliac vessels was found not to be one of the common stone locations. Similar results were observed in several subsequent studies (Fig. 2) [8,9,10], bringing an end to the long-time conventional concept of three physiological narrowings in the upper urinary tract. Thus, the renewed concept defines only two physiological narrowings: those in the upper ureter and the UVJ.
Structures of the retroperitoneum surrounding the ureter
The mechanism by which stones lodge at the level of the UVJ is well understood: the UVJ has a valve-like function to prevent urinary reflux, and the intravesical portion of the ureter is the narrowest section of the upper urinary tract [11]. Less well understood, on the other hand, are the factors that cause stones to lodge at the level of the upper ureter. We investigated the retroperitoneal anatomy in this area by correlating cadaveric findings with those of CT images; thereby, we revealed its mechanism and made a new anatomical discovery [12].
The retroperitoneal region of a cadaveric specimen is displayed in Fig. 3. When approached from the ventral side, the ureter is observed beneath the layer of gonadal vessels. Continuing from the renal pelvis, the ureter is first located in the perirenal portion. This part of the ureter is relatively mobile within the perirenal fat pads. Where the ureter exits the perirenal space, it is fixed firmly to the anteromedial aspect of the psoas major muscle. This part of the ureter is less mobile. In other words, the ureter’s state of mobility and fixation changes at the point where it passes through the border of the perirenal space. We discovered that this occurs approximately at the level where the ureter crosses dorsal to the ipsilateral gonadal vein, and termed it the “crossing point” [12].
Do urinary tract stones lodge at the crossing point?
In another study, we investigated CT images of patients who presented to the emergency department with acute back pain and were diagnosed with acute renal colic [13]. We discovered that the peak site of urinary stone distribution in the upper ureter was corresponding approximately to the level of the crossing point (Fig. 4), which is due to the change in ureteral fixation at that level. It was also revealed that large stones tended to be located only at or above the level of the crossing point (Fig. 5). This endorses the crossing point as the location where not only ureteral mobility, but also ureteral compliance changes.
Is the crossing point different from the ureteropelvic junction?
The upper urinary tracts are continuous tubes conveying urine from the kidneys to the bladder. They are covered with the same urothelium throughout, with no definite histological difference between the renal pelvis and the ureter. Thus, the definition of the ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) is based not on a histological, but on a morphological feature: the location where the diameter of the upper urinary tract shrinks. This is a somewhat subjective definition and, therefore, can be confusing.
When a stone lodges in the urinary tract, the upstream tract dilates because of urinary stasis. If dilatation occurs at the level of the upper ureter or crossing point, its dilated diameter mimics that of the UPJ, even if it is not at the level where the diameter originally changes (Fig. 6). We suspect that this often leads to misidentification of the stone lodge site as the UPJ in clinical settings.
Kinking of the upper ureter
Kinking of the upper ureter is not a rare phenomenon and can be observed during retrograde pyelography or CT urography in daily clinical practice (Fig. 7). This finding is often ignored, probably because it is understood empirically by most radiologists or urologists that the kinking itself does not usually cause clinical problems. But in fact, this finding is another manifestation of the new anatomical concept of the retroperitoneal space aforementioned.
Kinking of the upper ureter is identified in approximately 20% of CT urography images [12]. It occurs always at or above the level of the crossing point. The underlying mechanism is the relative mobility of the ureter in the perirenal space (above the level of the crossing point), allowing it to loosen when the kidney descends by respiration or other physiological movements. This physiological phenomenon is radiologically identified as kinking of the ureter (Fig. 8). In other words, this finding reflects the fact that the ureter is always forced to adjust its length according to the kidney’s dynamic movement in the retroperitoneum. Additionally, it should be mentioned that CT urography is usually performed during the inspiratory phase, which is when the kidney descends; this theoretically increases the likelihood of observing kinking of the ureter. Dynamic movement of the ureter correlating with that of the kidney can also be observed during angiography or fluoroscopy (Fig. 9), which enhances understanding of the structural dynamics of this phenomenon. During hydronephrosis caused by obstruction in the lower ureter, this kinking is even more prominent.
In short, although kinking of the upper ureter itself is a normal radiological finding, it is an important key to understand the whole picture of the underlying retroperitoneal anatomy around the ureter.
Clinical relevance and perspective
This novel retroperitoneal anatomical concept has brought about a paradigm shift in the conventional theory of the physiological narrowings in the upper urinary tract. In CT diagnosis of urinary stones obstruction, it is essential to recognize this new concept and assess stone location correctly. In future, the clinical characteristics and prognosis of stones lodging at the crossing point should be determined. This anatomical discovery also has the potential to bring about new surgical approaches and better understanding of the retroperitoneal space. In addition, further investigation is needed to assess the relationship between the site of conventionally known as “UPJ obstruction” and the crossing point.
Conclusion
-
1.
There are only two physiological narrowings in the upper urinary tract: the upper ureter and the UVJ.
-
2.
Urinary stones commonly lodge in the upper ureter due to the change in ureteral mobility and compliance where the ureter exits the perirenal space.
-
3.
The level of this common obstruction site is at the crossing point, where the ureter crosses over the ipsilateral gonadal vein.
-
4.
Kinking of the upper ureter is a normal finding, caused by loosening of the upper ureter at or above the crossing point.
References
Baggish MS. Identifying and avoiding ureteral injury. In: Baggish MS, Karram MM, editors. Atlas of pelvic anatomy and gynecologic surgery. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2016. p. 435–48.
Moses K, Banks J, Nava P, Petersen D. Pelvic viscera. In: Moses K, Banks J, Nava P, Petersen D, editors. Atlas of clinical gross anatomy. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2013. p. 460–77.
Mohamed AE. Surgical, radiologic, and endoscopic anatomy of the kidney and ureter. In: McDougal WS, Kavoussi LR, Partin AW, Peters CA, Wein AJ, editors. Campbell-walsh urology. 11th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2016. p. 967–77.
Tanagho EA. Anatomy of the genitourinary tract. In: McAninch JW, Lue TF, editors. Smith’s and Tanagho’s general urology. 18th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies; 2013. p. 1–16.
Standring S. Kidney and ureter. In: Standring S, editor. Gray’s anatomy. 41st ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2016. p. 1237–54.
Dodson AI. Anatomy and surgical approach to the urogenital tract in the male. In: Campbell M, editor. Urology. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company; 1954. p. 11–7.
Eisner BH, Reese A, Sheth S, Stoller ML. Ureteral stone location at emergency room presentation with colic. J Urol. 2009;182(1):165–8.
Song HG, Cho ST, Kim KK. Investigation of the location of the ureteral stone and diameter of the ureter in patients with renal colic. Korean J Urol. 2010;51:198–201.
Moon YJ, Kim HW, Kim JB, Kim HG, Chang YS. Distribution of ureteral stones and factor affecting their location and expulsion in patients with renal colic. Korean J Urol. 2015;56:717–21.
Ordon M, Schuler TD, Ghiculete D, Pace KT, Honey RJ. Stone lodge at three sites of anatomic narrowing in the ureter: clinical fact or fiction? J Endourol. 2013;27:270–6.
Arson BI, McVay CB. Ureter, great vessels and nerves. In: Arson BI, McVay CB, editors. Surgical anatomy. 6th ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company; 1984. p. 760–77.
Kamo M, Nozaki T, Yoshida K, Tateishi U, Akita K. Kinking of the upper ureter in CT urography: anatomic and clinical significance. Surg Radiol Anat. 2016;38:1115–21.
Kamo M, Nozaki T, Starkey J, Horiuchi S, Muraishi N, Hattori K, et al. The peak site of stone distribution in the upper ureter is unlikely the ureteropelvic junction: computed tomography analysis of stone lodging site with respect to a newly identified area of constriction. Urology. 2017;107:31–6.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Statement of human and/or animals participants
The manuscript is a review article and has no studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
This article is published under an open access license. Please check the 'Copyright Information' section either on this page or in the PDF for details of this license and what re-use is permitted. If your intended use exceeds what is permitted by the license or if you are unable to locate the licence and re-use information, please contact the Rights and Permissions team.
About this article
Cite this article
Kamo, M., Nozaki, T., Horiuchi, S. et al. There are no three physiological narrowings in the upper urinary tract: a new concept of the retroperitoneal anatomy around the ureter. Jpn J Radiol 39, 407–413 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-020-01080-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-020-01080-7