Summary
Replacing urethral tissue with functional scaffolds has been one of the challenging problems in the field of urethra reconstruction or repair over the last several decades. Various scaffold materials have been used in animal studies, but clinical studies on use of scaffolds for urethral repair are scarce. The aim of this study was to review recent animal and clinical studies on the use of different scaffolds for urethral repair, and to evaluate these scaffolds based on the evidence from these studies. PubMed and OVID databases were searched to identify relevant studies, in conjunction with further manual search. Studies that met the inclusion criteria were systematically evaluated. Of 555 identified studies, 38 were included for analysis. It was found that in both animal and clinical studies, scaffolds seeded with cells were used for repair of large segmental defects of the urethra, such as in tubular urethroplasty. When the defect area was small, cell-free scaffolds were more likely to be applied. A lot of pre-clinical and limited clinical evidence showed that natural or artificial materials could be used as scaffolds for urethral repair. Urinary tissue engineering is still in the immature stage, and the safety, efficacy, cost-effectiveness of the scaffolds are needed for further study.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Yamzon J, Perin L, Koh CJ. Current status of tissue engineering in pediatric urology. Curr Opin Urol, 2008,18(4):404–407
Atala A. Recent applications of regenerative medicine to urologic structures and related tissues. Curr Opin Urol, 2006,16(4):305–309
Tian H, Bharadwaj S, Liu Y, et al. Differentiation of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells into bladder cells: potential for urological tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part A, 2010,16(5):1769–1779
Wood D, Southgate J. Current status of tissue engineering in urology. Curr Opin Urol, 2008,18(6):564–569.
Gimble JM, Katz AJ, Bunnell BA. Adipose-derived stem cells for regenerative medicine. Circ Res, 2007,100(9): 1249–1260.
Reed CR, Han L, Andrady A, et al. Composite tissue engineering on polycaprolactone nanofiber scaffolds. Ann Plast Surg, 2009,62(5):505–512
Parks J 4th, Kath M, Gabrick K, et al. Nanotechnology applications in plastic and reconstructive surgery: a review. Plast Surg Nurs, 2012,32(4):156–164
Atala A. Recent developments in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Curr Opin Pediatr, 2006,18(2): 167–171
Horn J, de Haan RJ, Vermeulen M, et al. Nimodipine in animal model experiments of focal cerebral ischemia: a systematic review. Stroke, 2001,32(10):2433–2438
Pound P, Ebrahim S, Sandercock P, et al. Where is the evidence that animal research benefits humans? BMJ, 2004,328(7438):514–517
Nuininga JE, van Moerkerk H, Hanssen A, et al. Rabbit urethra replacement with a defined biomatrix or small intestinal submucosa. Eur Urol, 2003,44(2):266–271
Kawano PR, Fugita OE, Yamamoto HA, et al. Comparative study between porcine small intestinal submucosa and buccal mucosa in a partial urethra substitution in rabbits. J Endourol, 2012,26(5):427–432
Kropp BP, Ludlow JK, Spicer D, et al. Rabbit urethral regeneration using small intestinal submucosa onlay grafts. Urology, 1998,52(1):138–142
Chung YG, Tu D, Franck D, et al. Acellular bi-layer silk fibroin scaffolds support tissue regeneration in a rabbit model of onlay urethroplasty. PloS One, 2014,9(3): e91592
El-Assmy A, El-Hamid MA, Hafez AT. Urethral replacement: a comparison between small intestinal submucosa grafts and spontaneous regeneration. BJU Int, 2004,94(7):1132–1135
Fu Q, Deng CL, Liu W, et al. Urethral replacement using epidermal cell-seeded tubular acellular bladder collagen matrix. BJU Int, 2007,99(5):1162–1165
Fu Q, Deng CL, Song XF, et al. Long-term study of male rabbit urethral mucosa reconstruction using epidermal cell. Asian J Androl, 2008,10(5):719–722
De Filippo RE, Kornitzer BS, Yoo JJ, et al. Penile urethra replacement with autologous cell-seeded tubularized collagen matrices. J Tissue Eng Regen Med, 2015,9(3):257–264
Gu GL, Xia SJ, Zhang J, et al. Tubularized urethral replacement using tissue-engineered peritoneum-like tissue in a rabbit model. Urol Int, 2012,89(3):358–364.
Orabi H, AbouShwareb T, Zhang Y, et al. Cell-seeded tubularized scaffolds for reconstruction of long urethral defects: a preclinical study. Eur Urol, 2013,63(3):531–538
Li CL, Liao WB, Yang SX, et al. Urethral reconstruction using bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell-and smooth muscle cell-seeded bladder acellular matrix. Transplanta Proc, 2013,45(9):3402–3407
Chen F, Yoo JJ, Atala A. Acellular collagen matrix as a possible "off the shelf" biomaterial for urethral repair. Urology, 1999,54(3):407–410
Li H, Xu Y, Xie H, et al. Epithelial-differentiated adipose-derived stem cells seeded bladder acellular matrix grafts for urethral reconstruction: an animal model. Tissue Eng Part A, 2014,20(3–4):774–784
Li C, Xu YM, Liu ZS, et al. Urethral reconstruction with tissue engineering and RNA interference techniques in rabbits. Urology, 2013,81(5):1075–1080.
Huang JW, Xie MK, Zhang Y, et al. Reconstruction of penile urethra with the 3-dimensional porous bladder acellular matrix in a rabbit model. Urology, 2014,84(6): 1499–1505
Chun SY, Kim BS, Kwon SY, et al. Urethroplasty using autologous urethral tissue-embedded acellular porcine bladder submucosa matrix grafts for the management of long-segment urethral stricture in a rabbit model. J Korean Med Sci, 2015,30(3):301–307
Sievert KD, Bakircioglu ME, Nunes L, et al. Homologous acellular matrix graft for urethral reconstruction in the rabbit: histological and functional evaluation. J Urol, 2000,163(6):1958–1965
Sievert KD, Wefer J, Bakircioglu ME, et al. Heterologous acellular matrix graft for reconstruction of the rabbit urethra: histological and functional evaluation. J Urol, 2001,165(6 Pt 1):2096–2102
Shokeir A, Osman Y, Gabr M, et al. Acellular matrix tube for canine urethral replacement: is it fact or fiction? J Urol, 2004,171(1):453–456
Han P, Song C, Yang YR, et al. Urethral acellular matrix graft for repairing urethral defect in rabbits. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao(Chinese), 2009,29(1):124–127
Parnigotto PP, Gamba PG, Conconi MT, et al. Experimental defect in rabbit urethra repaired with acellular aortic matrix. Urol Res, 2000,28(1):46–55
Wang F, Liu T, Yang L, et al. Urethral reconstruction with tissue-engineered human amniotic scaffold in rabbit urethral injury modelsJ. Med Sci Monit, 2014,20: 2430–2438
Xie M, Song L, Wang J, et al. Evaluation of stretched electrospun silk fibroin matrices seeded with urothelial cells for urethra reconstruction. J Surg Res, 2013,184(2): 774–781
Xie M, Xu Y, Song L, et al. Tissue-engineered buccal mucosa using silk fibroin matrices for urethral reconstruction in a canine model. J Surg Res, 2014,188(1): 1–7
Liu CX, Lin YY, Li HL, et al. Application of silk fibroin film for repairing rabbit urethral defect. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao(Chinese). 2007,27(2):184–187
Kanatani I, Kanematsu A, Inatsugu Y, et al. Fabrication of an Optimal Urethral Graft Using Collagen-Sponge Tubes Reinforced with Copoly(L-Lactide/e-Caprolactone) Fabric. Tissue Eng, 2007,13(12):2933–2940
Micol LA, Arenas da Silva LF, Geutjes PJ, et al. In-vivo performance of high-density collagen gel tubes for urethral regeneration in a rabbit model. Biomaterials, 2012,33(30):7447–7455
Mantovani F, Trinchieri A, Castelnuovo C, et al. Reconstructive urethroplasty using porcine acellular matrix. Eur Urol, 2003,44(5):600–602
le Roux PJ. Endoscopic urethroplasty with unseeded small intestinal submucosa collagen matrix grafts: a pilot study. J Urol, 2005,173(1):140–143
Hauser S, Bastian PJ, Fechner G, et al. Small intestine submucosa in urethral stricture repair in a consecutive series. Urology, 2006,68(2):263–266
Fiala R, Vidlar A, Vrtal R, et al. Porcine small intestinal submucosa graft for repair of anterior urethral strictures. Eur Urol, 2007,51(6):1702–1708
Palminteri E, Berdondini E, Colombo F, et al. Small intestinal submucosa (SIS) graft urethroplasty: short-term results. Eur Urol, 2007,51(6):1695–1701
Atala A, Guzman L, Retik AB. A novel inert collagen matrix for hypospadias repair. J Urol, 1999,162(3 Pt 2):1148–1151
El-Kassaby AW, Retik AB, Yoo JJ, et al. Urethral stricture repair with an off-the-shelf collagen matrix. J Urol, 2003,169(1):170–173
el-Kassaby A, Abou Shwareb T, Atala A. Randomized comparative study between buccal mucosal and acellular bladder matrix grafts in complex anterior urethral strictures. J Urol, 2008,179(4):1432–1436
Bhargava S, Patterson JM, Inman RD, et al. Tissue-engineered buccal mucosa urethroplasty-clinical outcomes. Eur Urol, 2008,53(6):1263–1269
Fossum M, Skikuniene J, Orrego A, et al. Prepubertal follow-up after hypospadias repair with autologous in vitro cultured urothelial cells. Acta Paediatr, 2012,101(7):755–760
Raya-Rivera A, Esquiliano DR, Yoo JJ, et al. Tissue-engineered autologous urethras for patients who need reconstruction: an observational study. Lancet, 2011,377(9772):1175–1182
Carson JS, Bostrom MP. Synthetic bone scaffolds and fracture repair. Injury, 2007,38(Suppl 1): 33–37
Carson CC. Urethroplasty: a model for international progress in urology. Contemp Urol, 2006,18(3):1
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Qi, N., Li, Wj. & Tian, H. A systematic review of animal and clinical studies on the use of scaffolds for urethral repair. J. Huazhong Univ. Sci. Technol. [Med. Sci.] 36, 111–117 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-016-1551-5
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-016-1551-5