Abstract
Saprotrophic and ectomycorrhizal (EcM) forest fungi decompose organic matter and mobilize nutrients for host plants, respectively. Competition between the two guilds may cause the so-called Gadgil effect, i.e., decreased litter decomposition rates resulting in increased carbon storage in soil. The Gadgil effect was supposed to even affect global climate, highlighting the necessity to understand fungal distribution and interactions in soil. Searching for evidence of competition between saprotrophic and mycorrhizal fungi, we analyzed the distribution of fungi along a well-stratified vertical spruce forest soil profile in two seasons, i.e., autumn and the following spring. The different soil strata (i.e., two mineral horizons and two organic layers) underneath the litter layer were colonized by distinct fungal communities, which included roughly consistent proportions of all fungal guilds and phyla at each time. However, the community composition changed quantitatively between the sampling dates. Along the vertical soil profile, it differed mostly between the organic layers and the mineral soil, which is supposed to be due to differences in the predominant energy sources (i.e., aboveground litter and rhizodeposition, respectively). Network analyses revealed co-occurrences (i.e., positive correlations of individual abundances) to outweigh mutual exclusions (i.e., negative correlations) between individual fungi in each soil stratum and season. This also applied for interactions between saprotrophic and EcM fungi. Network analyses therefore provided no indications for a possible Gadgil effect. However, considering individual nutrient use efficiencies might refine insights from network analyses in future studies and facilitate linking community dynamics to ecosystem processes.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Forest soil fungi are key players in nutrient cycling and therefore essential for forest ecosystem functioning (Swift et al. 1979; Schneider et al. 2012b; Tedersoo et al. 2014). They decompose dead organic matter (Dix and Webster 1995; Boddy et al. 2008) and provide nutrients to living trees (Smith and Read 2008). These functions are fulfilled by at least two different fungal guilds, i.e., saprotrophic and mycorrhizal fungi. Competition between fungi of the two guilds in soil may have an impact on ecosystem functioning (Cairney and Meharg 2002), because nutrient cycling may shift towards decomposition by saprobes or nutrient exploitation by mycorrhizal fungi as a result. The latter may slow down decomposition of organic matter in forest soils, which is known as the “Gadgil effect” (Gadgil and Gadgil 1971). Recent field experiments revealed the magnitude of this effect: soil respiration, i.e., mineralization of soil carbon, was reduced by 67% where abundance of ectomycorrhizal (EcM) fungi was high (Averill and Hawkes 2016). Reduced decomposition due to nitrogen (N) depletion from organic matter by EcM fungi was hypothesized to generally result in an accumulation of carbon in temperate and boreal forest soils, which are the major EcM habitats (Averill et al. 2014). Due to soil carbon-climate feedbacks (Bradford et al. 2016), the Gadgil effect may be also important for predicting future climate (Averill and Hawkes 2016). Magnitude and even direction of the Gadgil effect are, however, variable across experiments and challenging to assess in natural ecosystems (Fernandez and Kennedy 2016). While the effect is mainly discussed for the litter layer, profound impacts on ecosystem processes are also conceivable to arise from competition between saprotrophic and mycorrhizal fungi in the underlying organic layers and mineral horizons.
The two fungal guilds were spatially separated along a vertical pine forest soil profile in Central Sweden (Lindahl et al. 2007), in which saprotrophic fungi dominated in recently fallen litter (Oi layer) on top of the forest floor, while mycorrhizal taxa were more abundant and active in the underlying layers of increasingly decomposed litter (Oe and Oa). Anderson et al. (2014), however, found the highest frequency of mycorrhizal mycelia in the Oi layer of a Scottish pine forest and Dickie et al. (2002) revealed certain mycorrhizal fungi to even preferably colonize recently fallen pine needles at a site in Pennsylvania. This suggests that mycorrhizal fungi may be involved in decomposition of fresh litter, although their activity is not related to carbon acquisition, but to nitrogen and phosphorous assimilation (Lindahl and Tunlid 2015; Bödeker et al. 2016; Tunlid et al. 2016). Seasonal variation, which is rather pronounced in soil fungal communities in general (Voříšková et al. 2013) and mycorrhizal communities in particular (Bahram et al. 2015; Courty et al. 2008), may explain distribution patterns deviating between studies (Anderson et al. 2014). The spatial separation of fungal guilds in soil therefore appears not generalizable. Seasonal variation in niche selection along vertical soil profiles has, however, not been studied concertedly for saprotrophic and mycorrhizal fungi so far.
The goal of our study was to assess niche partitioning and co-occurrence patterns of individual fungi and fungal guilds along a vertical soil profile. We hypothesized that (1) individual fungi preferably occur in certain seasons and soil strata (i.e., mineral horizons and organic layers), while (2) fungal guilds and phyla (i.e., the sum of individuals) are more evenly distributed throughout space and time. Furthermore, (3) mutual exclusions (i.e., negative correlations between individual abundances) were assumed to be more frequent between fungi of different guilds than between fungi of the same guild. We analyzed the fungal communities at two points in time to account for temporal variation. Autumn and the following spring were chosen to embrace the winter season, which affects ecosystem dynamics most in coniferous forests (Havranek and Tranquillini 1995). In each season, four strata of four spruce forest soil cores were sampled. The fungal community was assessed by next-generation sequencing (NGS) of fungal barcoding regions in DNA extracts. Compositional differences in fungal communities among the soil strata were analyzed for fungal species, functional guilds, and higher taxa. Network analyses were conducted to assess the ratio of co-occurrences (i.e., positive correlations) to mutual exclusions (i.e., negative correlations) among individual fungi in general and between saprotrophic and mycorrhizal fungi in particular.
Material and methods
Sampling sites and sample collection
Soil samples were collected in an 80-year-old spruce forest in the “Naturpark Solling-Vogler” (51.7657° N, 9.5778° E, 530 m alt.), at a non-roofed control site (“D0”) of the “Solling roof project” (Bredemeier et al. 1998). The soil is classified as Dystric Cambisol (FAO 1998). Beneath the layer of fresh litter (Oi), which was removed before sampling, two organic layers (Oe and Oa) of moder type and 1–2 and 1–3 cm depth, respectively, covered the mineral soil with an A horizon of 7–10 cm above the B horizon. Acidity of the soil was slightly higher in the Oa (pH = 2.7) than in the Oe layer (pH = 2.9), but decreases with further soil depth (A 3.2, B 4.1) (Dörr et al. 2010; Kandeler et al. 2009; Theuerl et al. 2010). The content of organically bound nitrogen (N) consistently decreased from 16 (Oe) to 14 (Oa) to 2 (A) to 1 mg N per kg of dry soil (B). The same trend was found for inorganic N (314, 189, 8, and 4 mg kg−1, respectively) and organic carbon (418, 357, 38, and 14 mg kg−1, respectively). The ratio of (organic) C to N accordingly slightly decreased from roughly 26 in the organic layers to about 21 in the A and 18 in the B horizon. While total microbial and its fraction of fungal biomass both decreased with soil depth, the decrease was clearly more pronounced for fungal than for microbial biomass (Enowashu et al. 2009).
Soil cores (8 cm diam.) were drawn from four plots in October 2006 and April 2007, each. Samples were collected from the two organic layers (Oe, Oa) and two mineral horizons (A, B) of each soil core and after removal of roots transferred to sterile 15 ml reaction tubes, transported to the laboratory in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80 °C until further processing.
DNA extraction, library preparation, and sequencing
Total DNA was extracted from 0.5 g of each soil sample (Supplementary Table S2) according to Peršoh et al. (2008). To flocculate humic substances, Al2 (SO4)3 was added to the samples from the Oe (45–85 μmol of Al2 (SO4)3), Oa (45–115 μmol), A (90–130 μmol), and B (30–50 μmol) horizons. After pH adjustment, cells were disrupted in a nucleic acid extraction buffer (0.4 M LiCl, 100 mM Tris-HCl, 120 mM EDTA 2.5% SDS, pH 8), by adding 0.8 g of differently sized glass beads (0.1–0.4 mm diam.) and using a FastPrep™ Instrument (Bio 101) 5.5 ms−1. DNA was purified using a standard phenol-chloroform protocol, as detailed by Peršoh et al. (2008).
Amplicon libraries were prepared by two consecutive PCRs, with TAG and index sequences introduced in the first (PCR1) and second PCR (PCR2), respectively (Supplementary Table S1). TAG sequences were selected from those published by Poland et al. (2012) and appended to the 5′-end of the fungi-specific primers ITS1F (Gardes and Bruns 1993) and ITS4 (White et al. 1990). Different TAG lengths were selected to achieve an AC to GT ratio ≥ 0.25 in the first eight sequenced positions, thus facilitating cluster recognition by the MiSeq sequencer (Lundberg et al. 2013). The PCR1 primers were further appended at the 5′-end of the TAG sequences by 21 bp of the Illumina sequencing primer, as binding site for the PCR2 primers. These consisted of the P5/P7 adapter sites, the index sequences, and the sequencing priming sites (all sequences © 2007–2012 Illumina, Inc.). Differently indexed PCR2 primers were used for PCR1 products with identical TAG sequences. Primers were synthesized by Microsynth AG (Switzerland).
Amplification was achieved using the MangoTaq kit (Bioline GmbH, Germany). Each PCR reaction of 25 μl in total contained 15.64 μl H2O, 5 μl 5× reaction buffer, 1.7 μl MgCl2 (50 mM), 0.5 μl dNTP (10 mM), 0.5 μl of each primer (10 mM), 0.16 μl polymerase (5 U μl−1), and 1 μl of DNA extract. Following denaturation at 94 °C for 3 min, the ITS regions were amplified in 33 cycles (94 °C for 27 s, 56 °C for 60 s, 72 °C for 90 s) and a final extension step at 72 °C for 7 min. PCR products were purified using ExoSAP-IT® as recommended by the manufacturer (Affymetrix, UK), but diluted 1:5. Of the purified products, 5 μl was amplified in 5 cycles as detailed above, but with an annealing temperature of 53 °C and 10 min of final extension. PCR2 also differed slightly by applying 0.75 μl of the PCR2 primers, 0.13 μl of polymerase, and 11.17 μl of H2O.
Images from gel electrophoresis (0.8% agarose, 120 V for ca. 20 min) were evaluated using ImageJ (Schneider et al. 2012a), to calculate the relative concentration of each PCR2 product (excluding primer dimers) in relation to a 1 kb ladder (Bio-Budget, Germany). Between 20 and 22 PCR2 products of similar concentration were equimolary pooled. The volume of pools with low concentration was reduced in a centrifugal evaporator (UNIVAPO 100 ECH, UniEquip, Germany). The pools were purified using the Dynabeads Sequencing Clean Up Kit (Invitrogen, Germany) as specified by the manufacturer. Selection of amplicons between 450 and 1500 bp in length by preparative electrophoresis (Blue Pippin, Sage Science, USA) ensured that primer dimers and contaminates were removed. DNA concentrations in the pools were determined using the Qubit 2.0 fluorometer (Life Technologies) and Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent Technologies, USA). Based on these data, the pools were equimolarly pooled to a total concentration of 4 nM. The Illumina MiSeq platform (Illumina Inc.) was used for paired-end sequencing (2 × 250 bp; Kit v3 Chemistry) of this final amplicon library.
Sequence processing
The raw sequence reads were quality filtered and demultiplexed (i.e., assigned to samples) retaining the quality scores according to the incorporated of indices and TAGs using the Qiime pipeline (Caporaso et al. 2010) and deposited in the European Nucleotide Archive (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/data/view/PRJEB18588). Only the forward-orientated reads, representing the ITS1 rRNA gene region, were further processed, because earlier studies showed that sequence information of the ITS1 region alone is well suited to infer ecological patterns (Guerreiro et al. 2017; Röhl et al. 2017a). To compensate for length differences in the TAG sequences, ITS1 reads of samples with identical TAGs were extracted and trimmed at the 5′-end to a conserved region comprising the final 11 bp of the SSU rRNA gene region using the FastX toolkit (http://hannonlab.cshl.edu/fastx_toolkit/). Files with length-adjusted reads were merged and the ITS1 reads trimmed at the 3′-end to a length of 172 bp. The trimmed ITS1 reads were subjected to CD-HIT-OTU (Li et al. 2012) (http://weizhongli-lab.org/cd-hit-otu/) for clustering. The algorithm was chosen because of its outstanding performance in previously conducted comparative analyses (Röhl et al. 2017b). A similarity threshold of 97% was applied and a table generated, which lists the reads in each cluster for each sample. Representative sequences for each cluster were assigned to taxa using Qiime and the UNITE database v7 (Kõljalg et al. 2013) as reference. Unassignable clusters were assigned following Peršoh et al. (2010) (Supplementary Table S5) and yeasts by comparison of sequences with those of reliably identified strains from cultivation-based soil surveys (Yurkov et al. 2012b, a, 2016a, b). Sequences not assignable to fungi were excluded from further analyses. Clusters representing identical “species hypotheses” according to UNITE were summarized. The resulting clusters were treated as operational taxonomic units (OTUs). OTUs were grouped to functional guilds (Supplementary Table S4) according to their taxonomic affiliation, as indicated by Agerer (2006), Cannon and Kirk (2007), and Kirk et al. (2011) and in the “Faces of Fungi” (Jayasiri et al. 2015) and “FUNGuild” (Nguyen et al. 2016) databases.
Data analyses
The OTU table (Supplementary Table S3) was imported into Primer7 (Plymouth Routines) and standardized by the total number of reads per sample. For analyses of subgroups, i.e., distributions of OTUs belonging to a certain guild or taxon (e.g., Supplementary Fig. S8), the respective subsets of OTUs were re-standardized by the (sub)total. The data analyses were accordingly based on relative abundances of OTUs in samples. While this approach is commonly applied in NGS-based studies of microbial communities, relative abundances are prone to different biases (Bálint et al. 2016) and unlikely to reflect natural abundances (Peršoh 2013). Comparisons among similar samples are, however, considered to be reliable, because the samples were subjected to the same bias during processing (Bálint et al. 2016; Peršoh 2013). To assure that the results are not biased due to insufficient sequencing depth, all analyses were conducted in addition based on a dataset rarefied to 13,221 reads using the rarefy function of the vegan R package (https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan). One sample with 5719 reads, originating from the B horizon in spring 2007, was excluded from the analyses of the rarefied data.
A Bray-Curtis similarity matrix was calculated from the OTU table. It served as basis for statistical analyses (analysis of similarity, ANOSIM) and non-metric multidimensional scaling (nMDS) conducted in Primer7. Sequences of vertical strata and sampling dates were considered as ordered for two-way crossed and separate one-way ANOSIM analyses. Abundances of OTUs were summarized per taxon and functional group to test for compositional differences among strata at different taxonomic levels and of ecological guilds. Spider diagrams and bar charts were generated in Microsoft Excel, using preprocessed data exported from Primer7. Co-occurrence networks (Supplementary file Networks_Solling.cys) were calculated based on abundances coded in the OTU table using CoNet (http://systemsbiology.vub.ac.be/conet) as detailed by Faust et al. (2012). To prioritize interactions between fungi over environmental effects, the analyses were conducted separately for each sampling category (horizon × date), following the approach by Guerreiro et al. (2017). Co-occurrence networks were calculated for those sampling categories for which four samples were successfully sequenced (see below), resulting in six separate networks. The applied parameters and selected similarity and correlation measures (i.e., Bray-Curtis and Kullback-Leibler (dis)similarity, Pearson and Spearman correlation) followed Faust et al. (2015) and the online tutorial of CoNet (http://psbweb05.psb.ugent.be/conet/microbialnetworks/conet.php). However, no threshold was applied, i.e., all positive and negative correlations (edges) were considered for the initial network. In the following (permutation and bootstrapping), only edges were retained, which represented according to at least two measures significant correlations, as indicated by Benjamini-Hochberg-corrected p values. OTUs occurring in less than three samples of the respective category were removed from the networks for downstream analyses.
Data availability
Accession numbers: Sequence reads were deposited in the European Nucleotide Archive (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena) under accession PRJEB18588.
Results
The sequencing data were first filtered for sufficient coverage and tested for technical biases to ensure reliability of the downstream analyses. Library preparation was successful for 30 of the 32 samples. Sequencing provided 1,749,216 reads assignable to these samples. Of these, 1,407,660 were clustered to 383 OTUs, which represent proxies for species. Each cluster of the remaining and discarded 314,556 reads contained less than 66 reads. These clusters were estimated to represent noise by the clustering software. After excluding two samples covered by less than 5 k reads, the remaining 28 samples contained > 50 k reads on average (Supplementary Table S2). Taxonomic assignment revealed 325 OTUs (1,400,804 reads) to represent fungi. Each fungal OTU was covered on average by 4310 reads, i.e., by 154 reads per sample. The number of fungal OTUs detected in mineral soil horizons (A and B) was clearly lower than that in the covering organic layers (Oe, Oa) (Fig. 1, Supplementary Fig. 1). While a weak correlation between read and OTU counts was observed across all samples (Spearman p = 0,015, R2 = 0.21), this was not observed separately for samples of the mineral horizons (p = 0.27) and organic layers (p = 0.62). Excluding three samples with less than 30 OTUs, which all originated from the B horizon in spring (Fig. 1), already prevented a significant correlation between OTU and read numbers across the remaining samples (p = 0.20). Even though these results indicated that sequencing depth is not a major issue, we conducted all analyses in addition based on the rarefied dataset to assure reliability of the results.
Vertical stratification of fungal taxa and functional guilds
Presence and abundance of the entirety of OTUs representing each fungal phylum and guild, respectively, were analyzed to uncover their distribution patterns. Averaged abundance and totalized occurrence are presented in the following, while results of the analyses of the rarefied data are shown in Supplementary Figs. S2 and S3. In addition, the distribution patterns are depicted for each plot separately in the Supplementary Figs. S4–S7. Each OTU of Ascomycota and Basidiomycota was represented on average by 3104 and 7573 sequence reads, respectively (Supplementary Tables S3 and S4). Amplicons of Basidiomycota were therefore more abundant than those of Ascomycota (Fig. 2(a)), but represented by fewer OTUs (Fig. 2(c)). Relative abundance of Ascomyota slightly increased in autumn from the Oe layer (25%) to the A horizon (36%), but consistently decreased with soil depth from 39% (Oe) to 11% (B) in spring. Basidiomycota showed the reverse trend: they marginally decreased from the Oe layer (58%) to the B horizon (55%) in autumn but clearly increased in abundance from 34 to 74% in spring. OTU richness of both phyla was clearly higher in the organic layers (Oe and Oa) than in the mineral soil (horizons A and B; Fig. 2(c) and Supplementary Fig. 3C). Disregarding seasonal variations (see below), abundance and OTU richness differed only marginally between the two organic layers and between the two mineral horizons. Apart from higher abundances in the Oe layer and in the A horizon in spring, Zygomycota showed only minor variations along the soil profile, concerning abundance and OTU richness (Fig. 2(a, c)).
Ectomycorrhizal (EcM) fungi were represented by only few OTUs (Fig. 2(d), Supplementary Fig. 3D) but constituted the most abundant functional guild (Fig. 2(b), Supplementary Fig. 3B), except for the Oe layer in spring. Apart from temporal variations (see below), they varied negligibly in abundance throughout the soil profile. The number of EcM OTUs found in the organic layers (i.e., 16–21) was, however, slightly higher than that in the mineral soil (11–16). Saprotrophic yeasts and filamentous fungi also occurred at consistent abundances, but more OTUs occurred in the organic layers. The consistent decrease of fungi with other or unknown biology with soil depth is mostly caused by fungi known to be animal and phytopathogenic or epiphytic, which predominantly occur in the upper strata (Supplementary Tables S3 and S4).
Phyla and functional guilds, represented by the total abundance of comprised OTUs, were not differentially distributed between strata, neither across (ANOSIM R < 0.01, p > 0.47; Fig. 3 and Supplementary Fig. S2) nor within seasons (R < 0.12, p > 0.18). Only in spring 2007, the abundance of fungal phyla differed slightly (p = 0.273), but significantly (p = 0.038) across the strata. Above species level, taxonomic composition of communities otherwise only differed significantly among the strata when summarized on order and genus level (p = 0.043 and 0.012, respectively), and then just marginally (R ≤ 0.19, Fig. 3). While species and OTU compositions of the fungal communities reflected stratification of the soil in general (R ≥ 0.75, p = 0.0001), Oa and A were the only adjacent strata inhabited by significantly different communities across seasons (Fig. 4(a)). However, omitting one sample of the B horizon (i.e., the sample with the lowest read count) indicated a significant difference between the A and B horizons (R = 0.427, p = 0,037), as also revealed by analyses of the rarefied data (Supplementary Fig. S2). OTU richness of all three major phyla peaked in the organic layers (Fig. 4(b)). Basidiomycota were accordingly most abundant in the (lowermost) B horizons, but most OTU-rich in the (uppermost) Oe layer. A similar pattern was observed for EcM fungi and saprotrophic yeasts; the relative abundances of both were highest in the mineral horizons, while most OTUs of these groups are found in the organic layers. Filamentous saprotrophic fungi were most abundant and OTU-rich in the Oe layer, even though abundance was only weakly but OTU richness strongly correlated with the NMDS axis (Fig. 4(b)).
In contrast to the total abundance of each functional guild, their composition of individual OTUs mostly differed significantly among strata (Supplementary Fig. S8). While the ectomycorrhizal communities in adjacent upper strata (Oe, Oa, A) were composed of similar, i.e., statistically indistinguishably (ANOSIM p > 0.35), fungal OTUs, they differed clearly in composition between the mineral horizons (p = 0.004, R = 0.596). The yeast community, by contrast, differed in OTU composition significantly between the organic layers (p = 0.008, R = 0.650) and by trend between Oa layer and A horizon (p = 0.078, R = 0.215), but not between the A and B horizons (p = 0.571). The community of filamentous saprotrophic fungi differed between all adjacent strata (p ≤ 0.015, R > 0.48).
To assess if the preferences of OTUs for certain strata were quantitative or qualitative, occurrences were analyzed for the most abundant 52 OTUs, i.e., OTUs accounting for ≥ 1.5% of the whole community in any stratum and season (Fig. 5, Supplementary Figs. S9–S12). The vast majority (i.e., 77%) of these occurred in all strata throughout the soil profile. Only two OTUs (i.e., Bullera coprosmae and a Tremellales sp.) and five OTUs (Hygrocybe mucronella, Vishniacozyma tephrensis, and a species of Candida, Hymenoscyphus, and Tremellales, each) were restricted to one and two strata, respectively. However, relative abundances indicated clear preferences for a certain stratum or at least for either the organic layers or the mineral horizons for 46 out of the 52 most abundant OTUs (Fig. 5, Supplementary Figs S9–S12).
Temporal patterns
To disentangle temporal inconsistencies between patterns of fungal phyla and guilds, these were analyzed in more detail, with a stronger focus on single OTUs, which apparently resolve the vertical stratification better than superordinate units. While seasonal differences in community composition were neither statistically significant across strata (Figs. 3 and 4, Supplementary Fig. S2) nor within single strata (ANOSIM R < 0.3, p > 0.13), individual taxa clearly differed in abundance between spring and autumn (Fig. 5, Supplementary Figs. S9–S12).
Temporal differences in the totalized relative OTU abundance of Ascomycota were obvious for the Oe layer and the mineral horizons (Fig. 2(a), Supplementary Fig. S3A). In the Oe layer, their proportion was higher in spring at the expense of Basidiomycota OTUs. This resulted in pronounced (ANOSIM R = 0.929) and by trend significantly (p = 0.067) different phyla compositions between autumn and spring in the Oe layer communities. Most strikingly, two OTUs representing the Herpotrichiellaceae and Helotiales (both Ascomycota), respectively, doubled in abundance, while the most abundant Basidiomycete in autumn (Tylospora fibrillosa) decreased in relative abundance from 30 to 6% between the sampling dates (Fig. 5). The increase of Zygomycota in the Oe layer was mostly due to an unidentified Mortierella sp. (SH180124) and M. gemmifera, both of which were twice as abundant in spring. The lower strata showed no significant differences according to phyla proportions between the sampling dates (ANOSIM R < 0.1, p > 0.4). Nevertheless, several individual fungi changed in abundance. In the A horizon, two species of Elaphomyces (Ascomycota) were less abundant in spring, when Mortierella macrocystis and M. longigemmata (Zygomycota) were more abundant. The OTU assignable as Cenococcum geophilum contributed most to the decline of Ascomycota in the B horizon between the sampling dates; it accounted on average for 14% (54% in a single sample) of the community in autumn, but was almost absent (i.e., < 0.01%) in spring. The simultaneous increase in Basidiomycota was predominantly due to considerably high abundances of OTUs absent in autumn (e.g., Bullera coprosmae 3%, Vishniacozyma tephrensis 8%, Hygrocybe mucronella 8%, Tremellales sp. (SH466030) 5%; Supplementary Figs. S10 and S12). These OTUs were also mostly restricted to single samples.
The higher proportion of saprotrophic fungi in the Oe layer in spring (Fig. 2(b)) resulted in a, by trend significant (ANOSIM p = 0.067), seasonal difference (R = 0.786) in the composition of functional guilds in the Oe layer, while temporal changes in guild proportions were insignificant (p > 0.6) and negligible (R < 0.1) in the underlying strata. The EcM fungus Tylospora fibrillosa decreased in abundance between the sampling dates from ≥ 30 to 4% in both organic layers and from 24 to 9% in the A horizon (Fig. 5). Three EcM fungi (Piloderma sphaerosporum, Russula ochroleuca, Thelephora terrestris) were most abundant in the Oe and the Oa layers in spring and autumn, respectively. Increasing abundance of Hygrophorus pustulatus partly compensated for the decline of Tylospora fibrillosa in the A horizon between the sampling dates. In the B horizon, the decrease of EcM fungi was mostly attributable to Cenococcum geophilum (see above). The most abundant EcM fungus in the B horizon (Tylospora asterophora) showed no temporal variation. Saprotrophic fungi consistently showed higher abundances in spring, except for the Oa layer. In the Oe layer, the majority of filamentous saprobes of all three phyla (see above) increased in abundance, including representatives of Basidiomycota taxa Trechisporales and Mycena. This was less consistent in the Oa layer, in which most saprotrophic fungi occurred at low abundance. Two representatives of the Zygomycota (i.e., M. macrocystis and M. longigemmata) contributed most to the increase of saprotrophic fungi in the A horizon. Abundances of filamentous saprobes and particularly of yeasts of the Basidiomycota predominantly caused the higher proportion of saprotrophic fungi in the B horizon in spring than in autumn (see above).
Temporal changes in the numbers of observed OTUs also reflected differences among the strata. Between the sampling dates in autumn and the following spring, OTU richness remained largely constant in the organic layers, but clearly decreased in the mineral horizons (Fig. 2(c, d)). In the Oe and Oa layers, 191 and 185 OTUs persisted and 40 and 43 were not recovered in spring, while 31 and 45, respectively, occurred only in spring. The transient OTUs accounted for up to 20% of all OTUs, but for less than 2% of the amplicon reads (i.e., abundance). Of all 146 OTUs detected in the A horizon in autumn, 77 were no longer recovered there in spring, while only 19 were exclusively present in the A horizon in spring. The irrecoverable OTUs represented 5% of the reads obtained from the A horizon in autumn, the newly occurring ones 2% in spring. From the B horizon, 72 OTUs (6% of the reads) of the 142 OTUs in autumn were no longer detected in spring and 25 (31% of the reads) were only found there in spring.
Co-occurrence and mutual exclusions among and between saprotrophic and ectomycorrhizal fungi
Network analyses were conducted to identify interactions among individual fungi, which may not be reflected on the level of integrated superordinate units. Each OTU was connected on average to 5.5 other OTUs in the Oe layer in autumn. Connectedness, i.e., the total number of pairwise co-occurrences, decreased slightly towards the Oa layer (5.3 connections per OTU) and, in accordance with species richness, sharply towards the mineral horizons A (1.9) and B (1.3). Positive correlations (i.e., co-occurrences) between abundances of OTUs prevailed in all strata (Fig. 6). The proportion of negative correlations (i.e., mutual exclusions) was highest in the Oa layer (21%) and decreased towards the B horizon (15%), but was lowest in the Oe layer (13%). Correlations among EcM and saprotrophic fungi, respectively, and between fungi of the different guilds were largely consistent with the overall pattern. The proportion of negative correlations (mutual exclusions) between abundances of OTUs of different guilds was lower than among EcM (Oa layer) and among saprotrophic fungi (Oe and A). Only in the B horizon, more negative correlations (21%) were found between EcM and saprotrophic fungi, than within each guild (18 and 14%, respectively).
Connectedness of fungal OTUs in the Oa layer was by roughly 10% lower in autumn than in spring, but decreased between the sampling dates by 69% in the B horizon. The proportion of mutual exclusions thereby decreased throughout all categories in the Oa layer and within EcM fungi in the B horizon. While the proportion of mutual exclusions remained roughly the same among saprotrophic and between saprotrophic and EcM fungi, it was higher in spring than in autumn regarding the entire community of the B horizon.
Discussion
Our results are in agreement with our first two hypotheses, assuming clear preference of individual fungi for certain strata (Figs. 3, 5) while the total of the fungi representing higher taxa or functional guilds were equally distributed along the soil profile (Figs. 2, 3). In disagreement with the hypotheses, temporal shifts appeared, at least in the uppermost Oe layer, statistically less pronounced in the community of individuals than in proportions of taxonomic and functional groups representing the sum of individuals. Considering this more differentiated picture, the spatial and temporal distribution patterns are discussed in the following with regard to their agreement with ecosystem processes. The communities are first compared between and then within organic layers and mineral soil horizons. The third hypothesis concerning positive (co-occurrences) and negative (i.e., mutual exclusions) correlations among abundances of OTUs representing saprotrophic and mycorrhizal fungi will be addressed thereafter.
Our results (Fig. 4) confirm that mineral soil is inhabited by significantly different fungal communities than the organic layers (Dickie et al. 2002; O’Brien et al. 2005; Lindahl et al. 2007; Taylor et al. 2014). However, niche partitioning appeared more distinct than in previous studies due to the abundance-based analyses applied here. The vast majority of the most abundant fungi (Supplementary Figs. S9–S12) occurred throughout the soil profile, but at negligible abundances in other than the preferred strata. Frequency-based distribution patterns would therefore coincide with the earlier reports. More distinct niche partitioning was already revealed based on relative abundances in a coniferous forest soil in Sweden (Rosling et al. 2003). Refinement of the taxonomic assignment of OTUs further increased the spatial resolution compared to the earlier study. The genus Tylospora, for example, occurred throughout the soil profile in Sweden. This also applies for our study, but we revealed that this pattern is due to opposed preferences of the two congeneric species at the Solling site (Fig. 5).
The reduced species richness in mineral horizons, compared to organic layers (Fig. 2), mirrors the decrease in microbial biomass, carbon content, and nitrogen content with soil depth at the study site (Enowashu et al. 2009; Kandeler et al. 2009; Dörr et al. 2010; Theuerl et al. 2010). However, the clear preferences of species for either mineral soil or litter layers (Fig. 5, Supplementary Figs. S9–S12) indicate also qualitative changes in community composition. Organic litter layers and mineral soil are generally quite distinct habitats regarding physicochemical conditions (Vries and Leeters 2001), which is reflected by the significant differences in community composition between the two adjacent strata A and O at the soil-litter interface (Fig. 4). This even resulted in fungal communities separated vertically by a few centimeter being less similar than communities of the same stratum which are separated horizontally by more than 100 km (Taylor et al. 2014). Litter and soil strata also differ according to energy sources, with aboveground litter serving as predominant carbon source in the former and plant roots in the latter (Kramer et al. 2010; Braakhekke et al. 2013; Spielvogel et al. 2014).
Progressing decomposition is supposed to shape fungal communities in the litter layer. Freshly fallen leaves are predominantly colonized by Ascomycota, and with progressing decomposition, the litter is increasingly colonized by Basidiomycota (Kendrick 1962; Hudson 1968; Ponge 2005; Kuramae et al. 2013; Voříšková and Baldrian 2012). The community succession is supposed to mirror the successive degradation of plant compounds (Frankland 1998), i.e., the most easily accessible ones become successively depleted (Berg and Staaf 1980; Moorhead and Sinsabaugh 2006; Šnajdr et al. 2011; Berg and McClaugherty 2014). Basidiomycota are better equipped to degrade recalcitrant compounds, such as lignin (Baldrian 2008; Lundell et al. 2010; Baldrian et al. 2012), but are outcompeted by faster growing fungi in the presence of more labile compounds (Dighton 2007). The high abundance of Basidiomycota in the analyzed Oe layer (Fig. 2) indicates an already advanced stage of fungal community succession and litter decomposition in the uppermost layer analyzed in this study. A further increase of Basidiomycota towards the humus layer (Oa) was only observed in spring, and then due to EcM taxa. This change was not accompanied by a significant shift in community composition, while composition of yeast and filamentous saprotrophic fungal communities changed significantly from the Oe to the Oa layer (Supplementary Fig. S8). In accordance with earlier studies (Lindahl et al. 2007; Peršoh et al. 2013; Žifčáková et al. 2016), saprotrophic Basidiomycota with ligninolytic capabilities, such as Trechisporales (Nagy et al. 2016) and Mycena spp. (Miyamoto et al. 2000; Žifčáková et al. 2011), were more abundant above the Oa layer (Fig. 5). Saprotrophic Basidiomycetes also predominantly colonized fresh litter and litter incubated above the humus layer in a field experiment (Bödeker et al. 2016). These results indicate concertedly that succession from Ascomycota to Basidiomycota is already completed in the Oe layer concerning the saprotrophic taxa. Opposed to the widely accepted scenario of a successive degradation of plant compounds, as outlined above, the previously reported attack of lignin during early stages of decomposition (Johansson et al. 1986) appears therefore well accordable to the distribution of ligninolytic fungi in stratified litter layers. It would be also compatible with the emerging idea that the molecular structure of plant litter may be less important than its microbial turnover for carbon pools in soil (Thevenot et al. 2010; Gougoulias et al. 2014; Kögel-Knabner 2016).
While ectomycorrhizal Basidiomycota occurring at notable abundance in the Oe layer in autumn concertedly preferred the Oa layer in the following spring, relative abundance of nearly all saprotrophic fungi increased in the Oe layer between the sampling dates (Fig. 5, Supplementary Figs. S9–S11). Voříšková et al. (2013) also found a clearly lower proportion of EcM fungi in the uppermost layer in spring than in winter, while fungal biomass was higher in spring. An increase of saprotrophic fungi over winter therefore appears plausible, in particular for representatives of the abundant genus Mortierella, which includes several psychrophilic species (Latter and Heal 1971; Carreiro and Koske 1992). The species are known to be capable of forming extensive mats below snow cover (Schmidt et al. 2008). However, ergosterol analyses indicated that fungal biomass decreased more than 5-fold in the Oe layer between autumn and spring at our sampling site (Enowashu et al. 2009). Since mycelia of Mortierella contain no ergosterol (Weete and Gandhi 1999), but represent key organisms in the observed temporal shifts, different biomass markers would be required to infer absolute shifts from the changes in relative abundances of barcoding genes. Nevertheless, the preference shift of EcM fungi from Oe to Oa over winter might indicate withdrawal of EcM fungi from the Oe layer, thus evading the lower temperatures at the soil surface in winter. While frost hardiness and survival strategies at low temperatures are known to differ among EcM fungi (Tibbett and Cairney 2007; Qu et al. 2010; Timling and Taylor 2012), detailed studies on seasonal variation of distribution patterns of individual fungi in temperate forests are currently missing.
Despite pronounced temporal shifts of individual ectomycorrhizal Basidiomycota in the organic layers, their overall abundance was consistently high in the Oa layer (Fig. 2). Many ectomycorrhizal Basidiomycota possess the enzymatic machinery to degrade humified organic material (Kohler et al. 2015) and play a crucial role in long-term decomposition processes (Lindahl and Tunlid 2015; Keiluweit et al. 2015; Moore et al. 2015). That saprotrophic fungi with similar capabilities predominantly occurred in the covering Oe layer suggests that EcM fungi may substantially contribute to degradation of the recalcitrant compounds accumulated in the underlying Oa layer (Bödeker et al. 2016). Limited accessibility of nutrients may lead to increased competition in this layer, which is indicated by the exceptionally high proportion of mutual exclusions among EcM fungi of the Oa layer (Fig. 6).
In contrast to the organic layers, fungi of the mineral soil preferred the same horizon at both sampling dates (Fig. 5, Supplementary Figs. S9–S12). While substrate quality differs in the organic layers due to progressing decomposition of aboveground litter, roots are the predominant carbon source throughout the mineral soil (Kramer et al. 2010; Braakhekke et al. 2013). Fungal preferences for a certain mineral horizon are therefore not ascribable to different energy sources, but probably caused by distinct competitiveness under different environmental conditions (Mujic et al. 2016). Due to their dependence on rhizodeposition by the tree, it is reasonable to assume that seasonality of fungal communities in mineral soil is tightly linked to annual cycles in tree physiology. Increasing abundance and decreasing species richness of saprotrophic fungi in mineral soil over winter (Fig. 2) may indicate emergence of a relatively uniform carbon source. The decreasing ratio of live to dead tree roots over winter (Persson and Stadenberg 2010) suggests that dead roots may serve as energy source for the saprotrophic fungi. At the same time, root growth ceases over winter (Mainiero et al. 2010), indicating a lower rate of carbon allocation to the rhizosphere, which would reduce heterogeneity of the carbon input into mineral soil (Jones et al. 2009) and thus diversity of the fungal community depending on this energy source. However, the finding that predominantly saprotrophic Zygomycota increased in the A horizon, but saprotrophic Basidiomycota in the B horizon (Figs. 2, 5 and Supplementary Figs. S10–S11), suggests that different factors and mechanisms may control and underlie the temporal shifts, respectively. In addition, several fungi of the mineral soil were only detected at one sampling date (Supplementary Figs. S10 and S12), which resulted in a higher species turnover in the mineral soil than in the organic layers. The transient species were mostly detected only in a single sample, indicating also a more patchy distribution. These findings may be ascribed to the decreasing root density with soil depth (Bredemeier et al. 1998; Borken et al. 2007; Leppälammi-Kujansuu et al. 2014), resulting in increasingly discontinuous distribution of energy sources (Ota et al. 2013).
Metabolic interdependencies were recently reported to outweigh resource competition in bacterial communities (Zelezniak et al. 2015). The prevalence of co-occurrences (i.e., positive correlations) of fungi in all strata throughout the soil profile might indicate similar mechanisms to underlie community assembly in litter decomposing and soil fungal communities (Fig. 6). An exceptionally high proportion of mutual exclusions (i.e., negative correlations) was only found in the Oa layer, which indicates stronger competition for not readily accessible nutrients in the recalcitrant organic compounds accumulated there. Mutual exclusions were, however, more common among ectomycorrhizal (EcM) fungi than between saprotrophic and EcM fungi in this layer. In contrast to our third hypothesis, representatives of both guilds predominantly co-occurred throughout the soil profile and mutual exclusions were comparatively rare. The network analyses therefore provide no evidence for a particularly pronounced competition between saprotrophic and EcM fungi beneath the layer of fresh litter. Reduced litter decomposition rates related to the Gadgil effect (Gadgil and Gadgil 1971; Fernandez and Kennedy 2016) are accordingly not indicated by the results. It is possible that the effect did not occur in the analyzed horizons and/or during the study period. It may not even occur at the 80-year-old stands studied here, because the Gadgil effect was detected earlier only in forest stands older than 132 years (Averill and Hawkes 2016). However, the applied approach to infer interactions from co-occurences of barcoding genes may also be insufficient to detect indications for ecosystem processes. Nutrient use efficiency differs among individual fungi (Geyer et al. 2016; Lashermes et al. 2016) and changes with time (Mooshammer et al. 2014). Mutual exclusions between fungi cycling nutrients particularly efficiently may have a greater effect than indicated by the overall number of interactions counted here. Conclusive evidence for impacts of competition on ecosystem processes is therefore best obtained directly, i.e., by network analyses based on expression levels of genes and quantities of proteins involved in the process of interest (Peršoh 2015).
Conclusion
Ectomycorrhizal and saprotrophic fungi co-occurred at consistent proportions in the strata throughout the spruce forest soil profile, but the share of saprobes was higher in spring than in the preceding autumn. This indicates similar functionality of the fungal communities in the different strata, but only at a certain time. Species composition of communities and functional guilds was rather distinct, in particular between mineral soil and organic layers. Differences in nutrient use efficiency of individual fungi may therefore result in different types and rates of ecosystem processes in the strata, despite similar overall abundances of functional guilds. This highlights the need for considering performance of individual fungi to infer the impact of fungal communities on ecosystem processes in future studies, either by complementary experimental studies or by directly targeting the relevant functional genes and/or proteins in addition. Temporal variations in community composition further suggest that reasonable time frames have to be covered, in particular to link long-term processes, such as carbon cycling, to fungal community structure (Peršoh 2015).
References
Agerer R (2006) Fungal relationships and structural identity of their ectomycorrhizae. Mycol Progress 5:67–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-006-0505-x
Anderson IC, Genney DR, Alexander IJ (2014) Fine-scale diversity and distribution of ectomycorrhizal fungal mycelium in a Scots pine forest. New Phytol 201:1423–1430. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12637
Averill C, Hawkes CV (2016) Ectomycorrhizal fungi slow soil carbon cycling. Ecol Lett 19:937–947. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12631
Averill C, Turner BL, Finzi AC (2014) Mycorrhiza-mediated competition between plants and decomposers drives soil carbon storage. Nature 505:543–545. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12901
Bahram M, Peay KG, Tedersoo L (2015) Local-scale biogeography and spatiotemporal variability in communities of mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol 205:1454–1463. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13206
Baldrian P (2008) Enzymes of saprotrophic basidiomycetes. In: Boddy L, Frankland JC, van West P (eds) British Mycological Society Symposia Series : Ecology of Saprotrophic Basidiomycetes, Volume 28. Academic Press, pp 19–41
Baldrian P, Kolařík M, Štursová M, Kopecký J, Valášková V, Větrovský T, Zifčáková L, Šnajdr J, Rídl J, Vlček C, Voříšková J (2012) Active and total microbial communities in forest soil are largely different and highly stratified during decomposition. ISME J. 6:248–258. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2011.95
Bálint M, Bahram M, Eren AM, Faust K, Fuhrman JA, Lindahl B, O’Hara RB, Öpik M, Sogin ML, Unterseher M, Tedersoo L (2016) Millions of reads, thousands of taxa. Microbial community structure and associations analyzed via marker genes. FEMS Microbiol Rev 40:686–700. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsre/fuw017
Berg B, McClaugherty C (2014) Plant Litter. Decomposition, humus formation, carbon sequestration, 3rd edn. Springer Berlin, Heidelberg
Berg B, Staaf H (1980) Decomposition rate and chemical changes of scots pine needle litter. II. Influence of chemical composition. Ecol Bull 373–390
Boddy L, Frankland JC, van West P (2008) Ecology of saprotrophic basidiomycetes. British Mycological Society symposium series, vol 28. Elsevier Academic Press, Amsterdam, London
Bödeker ITM, Lindahl BD, Olson Å, Clemmensen KE (2016) Mycorrhizal and saprotrophic fungal guilds compete for the same organic substrates but affect decomposition differently. Funct Ecol doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12677
Borken W, Kossmann G, Matzner E (2007) Biomass, morphology and nutrient contents of fine roots in four Norway spruce stands. Plant Soil 292:79–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-007-9204-x
Braakhekke MC, Wutzler T, Beer C, Kattge J, Schrumpf M, Ahrens B, Schöning I, Hoosbeek MR, Kruijt B, Kabat P, Reichstein M (2013) Modeling the vertical soil organic matter profile using Bayesian parameter estimation. Biogeosciences 10:399–420. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-399-2013
Bradford MA, Wieder WR, Bonan GB, Fierer N, Raymond PA, Crowther TW (2016) Managing uncertainty in soil carbon feedbacks to climate change. Nat Clim Change 6:751–758
Bredemeier M, Blanck K, Dohrenbusch A, Lamersdorf N, Meyer AC, Murach D, Parth A, Xu Y-J (1998) The Solling roof project—site characteristics, experiments and results. For Ecol Manag 101:281–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(97)00143-6
Cairney JWG, Meharg AA (2002) Interactions between ectomycorrhizal fungi and soil saprotrophs. Implications for decomposition of organic matter in soils and degradation of organic pollutants in the rhizosphere. Can J Bot 80:803–809. https://doi.org/10.1139/b02-072
Cannon PF, Kirk PM (2007) Fungal families of the world. CABI, Wallingford
Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, Costello EK, Fierer N, Pena AG, Goodrich JK, Gordon JI, Huttley GA, Kelley ST, Knights D, Koenig JE, Ley RE, Lozupone CA, McDonald D, Muegge BD, Pirrung M, Reeder J, Sevinsky JR, Turnbaugh PJ, Walters WA, Widmann J, Yatsunenko T, Zaneveld J, Knight R (2010) QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Meth. 7:335–336. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.f.303
Carreiro MM, Koske RE (1992) Room temperature isolations can bias against selection of low temperature microfungi in temperate forest soils. Mycologia 84:886. https://doi.org/10.2307/3760287
Courty P-E, Franc A, Pierrat J-C, Garbaye J (2008) Temporal changes in the ectomycorrhizal community in two soil horizons of a temperate oak forest. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:5792–5801. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01592-08
Dickie IA, Xu B, Koide RT (2002) Vertical niche differentiation of ectomycorrhizal hyphae in soil as shown by T-RFLP analysis. New Phytol 156:527–535. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00535.x
Dighton J (2007) Nutrient cycling by saprotrophic fungi in terrestrial habitats. In: Kubicek CP, Druzhinina IS (eds) Environmental and microbial relationships, vol 4. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 287–300
Dix NJ, Webster J (1995) Fungal Ecology. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht
Dörr N, Kaiser K, Mikutta R, Guggenberger G (2010) Slow response of soil organic matter to the reduction in atmospheric nitrogen deposition in a Norway spruce forest. Glob Chang Biol 16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02148.x
Enowashu E, Poll C, Lamersdorf N, Kandeler E (2009) Microbial biomass and enzyme activities under reduced nitrogen deposition in a spruce forest soil. Appl Soil Ecol 43:11–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2009.05.003
FAO (1998) World reference base for soil resources. World soil resources reports, 0532-0488, vol 84. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome
Faust K, Sathirapongsasuti JF, Izard J, Segata N, Gevers D, Raes J, Huttenhower C (2012) Microbial co-occurrence relationships in the human microbiome. PLoS Comput Biol 8:e1002606. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002606
Faust K, Lima-Mendez G, Lerat J-S, Sathirapongsasuti JF, Knight R, Huttenhower C, Lenaerts T, Raes J (2015) Cross-biome comparison of microbial association networks. Front Microbiol 6:1200. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.01200
Fernandez CW, Kennedy PG (2016) Revisiting the ‘Gadgil effect’: do interguild fungal interactions control carbon cycling in forest soils? New Phytol 209:1382–1394. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13648
Frankland JC (1998) Fungal succession—unravelling the unpredictable. Mycol Res 102:1–15
Gadgil RL, Gadgil PD (1971) Mycorrhiza and litter decomposition. Nature 233:133. https://doi.org/10.1038/233133a0
Gardes M, Bruns TD (1993) ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes—application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Mol Ecol 2:113–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.1993.tb00005.x
Geyer KM, Kyker-Snowman E, Grandy AS, Frey SD (2016) Microbial carbon use efficiency. Accounting for population, community, and ecosystem-scale controls over the fate of metabolized organic matter. Biogeochemistry 127:173–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-016-0191-y
Gougoulias C, Clark JM, Shaw LJ (2014) The role of soil microbes in the global carbon cycle: tracking the below-ground microbial processing of plant-derived carbon for manipulating carbon dynamics in agricultural systems. J Sci Food Agric 94:2362–2371. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.6577
Guerreiro MA, Brachmann A, Begerow D, Peršoh D (2017) Transient leaf endophytes are the most active fungi in 1-year-old beech leaf litter. Fungal Divers 89:237–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-017-0390-4
Havranek WM, Tranquillini W (1995) Physiological processes during winter dormancy and their ecological significance. In: Smith WK, Roy J, Hinckley TM (eds) Ecophysiology of coniferous forests. Elsevier, pp 95–124
Hudson HJ (1968) The ecology of fungi on plant remains above the soil. New Phytol 67:837–874. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1968.tb06399.x
Jayasiri SC, Hyde KD, Ariyawansa HA, Bhat J, Buyck B, Cai L, Dai Y-C, Abd-Elsalam KA, Ertz D, Hidayat I, Jeewon R, Jones EBG, Bahkali AH, Karunarathna SC, Liu J-K, Luangsa-ard JJ, Lumbsch HT, Maharachchikumbura SSN, McKenzie EHC, Moncalvo J-M, Ghobad-Nejhad M, Nilsson H, Pang K-L, Pereira OL, Phillips AJL, Raspé O, Rollins AW, Romero AI, Etayo J, Selçuk F, Stephenson SL, Suetrong S, Taylor JE, Tsui CKM, Vizzini A, Abdel-Wahab MA, Wen T-C, Boonmee S, Dai DQ, Daranagama DA, Dissanayake AJ, Ekanayaka AH, Fryar SC, Hongsanan S, Jayawardena RS, Li W-J, Perera RH, Phookamsak R, de Silva NI, Thambugala KM, Tian Q, Wijayawardene NN, Zhao R-L, Zhao Q, Kang J-C, Promputtha I (2015) The Faces of Fungi database. Fungal names linked with morphology, phylogeny and human impacts. Fungal Divers 74:3–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-015-0351-8
Johansson M-B, Kögel I, Zech W (1986) Changes in the lignin fraction of spruce and pine needle litter during decomposition as studied by some chemical methods. Soil Biol Biochem 18:611–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(86)90084-2
Jones DL, Nguyen C, Finlay RD (2009) Carbon flow in the rhizosphere. Carbon trading at the soil–root interface. Plant Soil 321:5–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-009-9925-0
Kandeler E, Brune T, Enowashu E, Dörr N, Guggenberger G, Lamersdorf N, Philippot L (2009) Response of total and nitrate-dissimilating bacteria to reduced N deposition in a spruce forest soil profile. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 67:444–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2008.00632.x
Keiluweit M, Nico P, Harmon ME, Mao J, Pett-Ridge J, Kleber M (2015) Long-term litter decomposition controlled by manganese redox cycling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:60. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1508945112
Kendrick WB (1962) Biological aspects of the decay of Pinus sylvestris leaf litter. Nova Hedwigia 4:313–342
Kirk PM, Cannon PF, Minter DW, Stalpers JA, Ainsworth GC, Bisby GR (2011) Ainsworth & Bisby’s dictionary of the fungi / by P.M. Kirk … [et al.] ; with the assistance of T.V. Andrianova [et al.], 10th ed. CABI Publishing, Wallingford
Kögel-Knabner I (2016) The macromolecular organic composition of plant and microbial residues as inputs to soil organic matter. Fourteen years on Soil Biol Biochem https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.08.011
Kohler A, Kuo A, Nagy LG, Morin E, Barry KW, Buscot F, Canback B, Choi C, Cichocki N, Clum A, Colpaert J, Copeland A, Costa MD, Dore J, Floudas D, Gay G, Girlanda M, Henrissat B, Herrmann S, Hess J, Hogberg N, Johansson T, Khouja H-R, Labutti K, Lahrmann U, Levasseur A, Lindquist EA, Lipzen A, Marmeisse R, Martino E, Murat C, Ngan CY, Nehls U, Plett JM, Pringle A, Ohm RA, Perotto S, Peter M, Riley R, Rineau F, Ruytinx J, Salamov A, Shah F, Sun H, Tarkka M, Tritt A, Veneault-Fourrey C, Zuccaro A, Tunlid A, Grigoriev IV, Hibbett DS, Martin F (2015) Convergent losses of decay mechanisms and rapid turnover of symbiosis genes in mycorrhizal mutualists. Nat Genet 47:410–415. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3223
Kõljalg U, Nilsson RH, Abarenkov K, Tedersoo L, Taylor AFS, Bahram M, Bates ST, Bruns TD, Bengtsson-Palme J, Callaghan TM, Douglas B, Drenkhan T, Eberhardt U, Dueñas M, Grebenc T, Griffith GW, Hartmann M, Kirk PM, Kohout P, Larsson E, Lindahl BD, Lücking R, Martín MP, Matheny PB, Nguyen NH, Niskanen T, Oja J, Peay KG, Peintner U, Peterson M, Põldmaa K, Saag L, Saar I, Schüßler A, Scott JA, Senés C, Smith ME, Suija A, Taylor DL, Telleria MT, Weiss M, Larsson K-H (2013) Towards a unified paradigm for sequence-based identification of fungi. Mol Ecol 22:5271–5277. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.12481
Kramer C, Trumbore S, Fröberg M, Cisneros Dozal LM, Zhang D, Xu X, Santos GM, Hanson PJ (2010) Recent (<4 year old) leaf litter is not a major source of microbial carbon in a temperate forest mineral soil. Soil Biol Biochem 42:1028–1037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.02.021
Kuramae EE, Hillekens RHE, de Hollander M, van der Heijden MGA, van den Berg M, van Straalen NM, Kreyling J (2013) Structural and functional variation in soil fungal communities associated with litter bags containing maize leaf. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 84:519–531. https://doi.org/10.1111/1574-6941.12080
Lashermes G, Gainvors-Claisse A, Recous S, Bertrand I (2016) Enzymatic strategies and carbon use efficiency of a litter-decomposing fungus grown on maize leaves, stems, and roots. Front Microbiol 7:1315. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01315
Latter PM, Heal OW (1971) A preliminary study of the growth of fungi and bacteria from temperate and Antarctic soils in relation to temperature. Soil Biol Biochem 3:365–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(71)90047-2
Leppälammi-Kujansuu J, Aro L, Salemaa M, Hansson K, Kleja DB, Helmisaari H-S (2014) Fine root longevity and carbon input into soil from below- and aboveground litter in climatically contrasting forests. For Ecol Manag 326:79–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.03.039
Li W, Fu L, Niu B, Wu S, Wooley J (2012) Ultrafast clustering algorithms for metagenomic sequence analysis. Brief Bioinform 13:656–668. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbs035
Lindahl BD, Tunlid A (2015) Ectomycorrhizal fungi—potential organic matter decomposers, yet not saprotrophs. New Phytol 205:1443–1447. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13201
Lindahl BD, Ihrmark K, Boberg J, Trumbore SE, Hogberg P, Stenlid J, Finlay RD (2007) Spatial separation of litter decomposition and mycorrhizal nitrogen uptake in a boreal forest. New Phytol 173:611–620. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01936.x
Lundberg DS, Yourstone S, Mieczkowski P, Jones CD, Dangl JL (2013) Practical innovations for high-throughput amplicon sequencing. Nat Meth. 10:999–1002. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2634
Lundell TK, Mäkelä MR, Hildén K (2010) Lignin-modifying enzymes in filamentous basidiomycetes—ecological, functional and phylogenetic review. J Basic Microbiol 50:5–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/jobm.200900338
Mainiero R, Kazda M, Schmid I (2010) Fine root dynamics in 60-year-old stands of Fagus sylvatica and Picea abies growing on haplic luvisol soil. Eur J Forest Res 129:1001–1009. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-010-0383-2
Miyamoto T, Igarashi T, Takahashi K (2000) Lignin-degrading ability of litter-decomposing basidiomycetes from Picea forests of Hokkaido. Mycoscience 41:105–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02464317
Moore JAM, Jiang J, Post WM, Classen AT (2015) Decomposition by ectomycorrhizal fungi alters soil carbon storage in a simulation model. Ecosphere 6:art29. https://doi.org/10.1890/ES14-00301.1
Moorhead DL, Sinsabaugh RL (2006) A theoretical model of litter decay and microbial interaction. Ecol Monogr 76:151–174
Mooshammer M, Wanek W, Hammerle I, Fuchslueger L, Hofhansl F, Knoltsch A, Schnecker J, Takriti M, Watzka M, Wild B, Keiblinger KM, Zechmeister-Boltenstern S, Richter A (2014) Adjustment of microbial nitrogen use efficiency to carbon:nitrogen imbalances regulates soil nitrogen cycling. Nat Commun 5:3694. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4694
Mujic AB, Durall DM, Spatafora JW, Kennedy PG (2016) Competitive avoidance not edaphic specialization drives vertical niche partitioning among sister species of ectomycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol 209:1174–1183. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13677
Nagy LG, Riley R, Tritt A, Adam C, Daum C, Floudas D, Sun H, Yadav JS, Pangilinan J, Larsson K-H, Matsuura K, Barry K, Labutti K, Kuo R, Ohm RA, Bhattacharya SS, Shirouzu T, Yoshinaga Y, Martin FM, Grigoriev IV, Hibbett DS (2016) Comparative genomics of early-diverging mushroom-forming fungi provides insights into the origins of lignocellulose decay capabilities. Mol Biol Evol 33:959–970. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msv337
Nguyen NH, Song Z, Bates ST, Branco S, Tedersoo L, Menke J, Schilling JS, Kennedy PG (2016) FUNGuild. An open annotation tool for parsing fungal community datasets by ecological guild. Fungal Ecol 20:241–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funeco.2015.06.006
O’Brien HE, Parrent JL, Jackson JA, Moncalvo J-M, Vilgalys R (2005) Fungal community analysis by large-scale sequencing of environmental samples. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:5544–5550. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.9.5544-5550.2005
Ota M, Nagai H, Koarashi J (2013) Root and dissolved organic carbon controls on subsurface soil carbon dynamics. A model approach. J Geophys Res Biogeosci 118:1646–1659. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JG002379
Peršoh D (2013) Factors shaping community structure of endophytic fungi—evidence from the Pinus-Viscum-system. Fungal Divers 60:55–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-013-0225-x
Peršoh D (2015) Plant-associated fungal communities in the light of meta’omics. Fungal Divers 75:1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-015-0334-9
Peršoh D, Theuerl S, Buscot F, Rambold G (2008) Towards a universally adaptable method for quantitative extraction of high-purity nucleic acids from soil. J Microbiol Methods 75:19–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2008.04.009
Peršoh D, Melcher M, Flessa F, Rambold G (2010) First fungal community analyses of endophytic ascomycetes associated with Viscum album ssp. austriacum and its host Pinus sylvestris. Fungal Biol 114:585–596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funbio.2010.04.009
Peršoh D, Segert J, Zigan A, Rambold G (2013) Fungal community composition shifts along a leaf degradation gradient in a European beech forest. Plant Soil 362:175–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-012-1271-y
Persson HÅ, Stadenberg I (2010) Fine root dynamics in a Norway spruce forest (Picea abies (L.) Karst) in eastern Sweden. Plant Soil 330:329–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-009-0206-8
Poland JA, Brown PJ, Sorrells ME, Jannink J-L (2012) Development of high-density genetic maps for barley and wheat using a novel two-enzyme genotyping-by-sequencing approach. PLoS One 7:e32253. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032253
Ponge J-F (2005) Fungal communities: relation to resource succession. In: Dighton J, White JF, Oudemans P (eds) The fungal community. Its organization and role in the ecosystem, 3rd ed. Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, FL
Qu L, Makoto K, Choi DS, Quoreshi AM, Koike T (2010) The role of ectomycorrhiza in boreal forest ecosystem. In: Osawa A, Zyryanova OA, Matsuura Y, Kajimoto T, Wein RW (eds) Permafrost ecosystems, vol 209. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 413–425
Röhl O, Graupner N, Peršoh D, Kemler M, Mittelbach M, Boenigk J, Begerow D (2017a) Flooding duration affects the structure of terrestrial and aquatic microbial eukaryotic communities. Microb Ecol https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-017-1085-9
Röhl O, Peršoh D, Mittelbach M, Elbrecht V, Brachmann A, Nuy J, Boenigk J, Leese F, Begerow D (2017b) Distinct sensitivity of fungal freshwater guilds to water quality. Mycol Progress 16:155–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-016-1261-1
Rosling A, Landeweert R, Lindahl BD, Larsson K-H, Kuyper TW, Taylor AFS, Finlay RD (2003) Vertical distribution of ectomycorrhizal fungal taxa in a podzol soil profile. New Phytol 159:775–783. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00829.x
Schmidt SK, Wilson KL, Meyer AF, Gebauer MM, King AJ (2008) Phylogeny and ecophysiology of opportunistic “snow molds” from a subalpine forest ecosystem. Microb Ecol 56:681–687. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-008-9387-6
Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW (2012a) NIH Image to ImageJ. 25 years of image analysis. Nat Meth 9:671–675. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2089
Schneider T, Keiblinger KM, Schmid E, Sterflinger-Gleixner K, Ellersdorfer G, Roschitzki B, Richter A, Eberl L, Zechmeister-Boltenstern S, Riedel K (2012b) Who is who in litter decomposition? Metaproteomics reveals major microbial players and their biogeochemical functions. ISME J. 6:1749–1762. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2012.11;
Smith SE, Read D (2008) Mycorrhizal Symbiosis, 3rd edn. Academic Press, London
Šnajdr J, Cajthaml T, Valášková V, Merhautová V, Petránková M, Spetz P, Leppänen K, Baldrian P (2011) Transformation of Quercus petraea litter: successive changes in litter chemistry are reflected in differential enzyme activity and changes in the microbial community composition. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 75:291–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2010.00999.x
Spielvogel S, Prietzel J, Leide J, Riedel M, Zemke J, Kögel-Knabner I (2014) Distribution of cutin and suberin biomarkers under forest trees with different root systems. Plant Soil 381:95–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-014-2103-z
Swift MJ, Heal OW, Anderson JM (1979) Decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems, vol 5. Univ of California Press
Taylor DL, Hollingsworth TN, McFarland JW, Lennon NJ, Nusbaum C, Ruess RW (2014) A first comprehensive census of fungi in soil reveals both hyperdiversity and fine-scale niche partitioning. Ecol Monogr 84:3–20. https://doi.org/10.1890/12-1693.1
Tedersoo L, Bahram M, Polme S, Koljalg U, Yorou NS, Wijesundera R, Villarreal Ruiz L, Vasco-Palacios AM, Thu PQ, Suija A, Smith ME, Sharp C, Saluveer E, Saitta A, Rosas M, Riit T, Ratkowsky D, Pritsch K, Poldmaa K, Piepenbring M, Phosri C, Peterson M, Parts K, Partel K, Otsing E, Nouhra E, Njouonkou AL, Nilsson RH, Morgado LN, Mayor J, May TW, Majuakim L, Lodge DJ, Lee SS, Larsson K-H, Kohout P, Hosaka K, Hiiesalu I, Henkel TW, Harend H, L-d G, Greslebin A, Grelet G, Geml J, Gates G, Dunstan W, Dunk C, Drenkhan R, Dearnaley J, de KA, Dang T, Chen X, Buegger F, Brearley FQ, Bonito G, Anslan S, Abell S, Abarenkov K (2014) Fungal biogeography. Global diversity and geography of soil fungi. Science 1256688:346. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1256688
Theuerl S, Dörr N, Guggenberger G, Langer U, Kaiser K, Lamersdorf N, Buscot F (2010) Response of recalcitrant soil substances to reduced N deposition in a spruce forest soil: integrating laccase-encoding genes and lignin decomposition. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 73:166–177. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2010.00877.x
Thevenot M, Dignac M-F, Rumpel C (2010) Fate of lignins in soils. A review. Soil Biol Biochem 42:1200–1211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.03.017
Tibbett M, Cairney JWG (2007) The cooler side of mycorrhizas. Their occurrence and functioning at low temperatures. Can J Bot 85:51–62. https://doi.org/10.1139/b06-152
Timling I, Taylor DL (2012) Peeking through a frosty window. Molecular insights into the ecology of Arctic soil fungi. Fungal Ecol 5:419–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funeco.2012.01.009
Tunlid A, Floudas D, Koide R, Rineau F (2016) Soil organic matter decomposition mechanisms in ectomycorrhizal fungi. In: Martin F (ed) Molecular mycorrhizal symbiosis. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, pp 257–275
Voříšková J, Baldrian P (2012) Fungal community on decomposing leaf litter undergoes rapid successional changes. ISME J 7:477–486. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2012.116
Voříšková J, Brabcová V, Cajthaml T, Baldrian P (2013) Seasonal dynamics of fungal communities in a temperate oak forest soil. New Phytol 201:269–278. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12481
Vries Wd, Leeters EEJM (2001) Chemical composition of the humus layer, mineral soil and soil solution of 150 forest stands in the Netherlands in 1990. Alterra-rapport, vol 424.1. Alterra, Green World Research, Wageningen
Weete JD, Gandhi SR (1999) Sterols and fatty acids of the Mortierellaceae. Taxonomic implications. Mycologia 91:642. https://doi.org/10.2307/3761250
White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Shinsky JJ, White TJ (eds) PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. Elsevier, pp 315–322
Yurkov A, Wehde T, Kahl T, Begerow D (2012a) Aboveground deadwood deposition supports development of soil yeasts. Diversity 4:453–474. https://doi.org/10.3390/d4040453
Yurkov AM, Kemler M, Begerow D (2012b) Assessment of yeast diversity in soils under different management regimes. Fungal Ecol 5:24–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funeco.2011.07.004
Yurkov AM, Röhl O, Pontes A, Carvalho C, Maldonado C, Sampaio JP (2016a) Local climatic conditions constrain soil yeast diversity patterns in Mediterranean forests, woodlands and scrub biome. FEMS Yeast Res 16:fov103. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsyr/fov103
Yurkov AM, Wehde T, Federici J, Schäfer AM, Ebinghaus M, Lotze-Engelhard S, Mittelbach M, Prior R, Richter C, Röhl O, Begerow D (2016b) Yeast diversity and species recovery rates from beech forest soils. Mycol Progress 15:845–859. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-016-1206-8
Zelezniak A, Andrejev S, Ponomarova O, Mende DR, Bork P, Patil KR (2015) Metabolic dependencies drive species co-occurrence in diverse microbial communities. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:6449–6454. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1421834112
Žifčáková L, Dobiášová P, Kolářová Z, Koukol O, Baldrian P (2011) Enzyme activities of fungi associated with Picea abies needles. Fungal Ecol 4:427–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funeco.2011.04.002
Žifčáková L, Větrovský T, Howe A, Baldrian P (2016) Microbial activity in forest soil reflects the changes in ecosystem properties between summer and winter. Environ Microbiol 18:288–301. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.13026
Acknowledgements
We thank Dirk Böttger and Norbert Lamersdorf (both Göttingen) and our project partners (i.e., working groups of François Buscot, Halle; Georg Guggenberger, Hannover; Barbara Reinhold-Hurek, Bremen; Ellen Kandeler, Hohenheim) for help during the soil sampling and the good cooperation. Christopher Sadlowski (Bochum) supported the library preparation and Andrey Yurkov (Braunschweig) revised the molecular identification of the basidiomycetous yeasts.
The study was designed by DB, DP and GR. DP and GR performed the sampling. NS extracted the DNA and conducted preliminary analyses. AB and DP prepared the amplicon libraries. AB performed the sequencing. DP analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. All authors discussed and contributed to the final version of the manuscript.
Funding
The project was partly funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG-project RA 731/9-1).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Section Editor: Marc Stadler
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Peršoh, D., Stolle, N., Brachmann, A. et al. Fungal guilds are evenly distributed along a vertical spruce forest soil profile while individual fungi show pronounced niche partitioning. Mycol Progress 17, 925–939 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-018-1405-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-018-1405-6