Abstract
This article contributes to a small but growing body of multi-sited and multi-scalar research on the Belt and Road Initiative. We focus on relations at the national, regional and international scales, and present original research from China and Turkey, to show how the Istanbul-Ankara high-speed railway has served as a testing ground for China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). Its construction was initially funded by the European Investment Bank, but it is now part of the backbone of the Turkish Government’s Middle Corridor plan which enhances west-east connectivity and integration with the Caucasus and Central Asia. We show that in contrast to multinational corporations from the OECD that seek to remain footloose, Chinese state-owned enterprises (SOEs) seek to adapt to, apprehend and ultimately shape local institutions. In the case of Turkey this proved difficult given its institutional alignment with the European Union. Thus, while the railway project was completed successfully by a consortium led by a Chinese SOE, Turkey’s dynamic and complex regulatory environment discourages Chinese SOEs in the infrastructure sector. We conclude that the Turkish and Chinese governments are currently pursuing complementary territorial visions yet their cooperation is project-based and pragmatic.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Adalet B, 2018. Hotels and Highways: The Construction of Modernization Theory in Cold War Turkey. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Adibelli B, 2016. Osmanlı’dan Günümüze Türk-Çin ilişkileri. 2nd ed. Istanbul: IQ Kültür Sanat Yayıncılık.
Anguelov D, 2020. Banking ‘development’: The geopolitical-economy of infrastructure financing. Area Development and Policy. https://doi.org/10.1080/23792949.2020.1799717.
Bahçecik O, 2017. OBOR and Turkey’s turn to the East. In: Alice Ekman et al. Three Years of China’s New Silk Roads: From Words to (Re)action? Études de l’Ifri, l’Ifri: February.
Baldwin R, 2016. The Great Convergence: Information Technology and the New Globalization. Cambridge: Belknap Press.
Bayirbağ M K, 2013a. Continuity and change in public policy: Exclusion, redistribution and state rescaling in Turkey. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37 (4): 1123–1146.
Bayirbağ M K, 2013b. Homo sum, humani nihil a me alienum puto: Kurtuluş yok tek başına! Praksis (Special issue on Gezi Park Protests), August: 7–16.
Castells M, 1996. The Information Age, Vol. 1: The Rise of the Network Society. Cambridge, MA and Oxford: Blackwell.
Chen X, Miao J T, Li X, 2021. The Belt and Road Initiative as Epochal Regionalisation. London: Routledge.
Coe N M, Hess M, Yeung H W-C et al., 2004. ‘Globalizing’ regional development: A global production networks perspective. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 29(4): 468–484.
Demirelli L, 2014. 2002 Sonrasında Türkiye’de Özelleştirme ve Demiryolu Hizmeti. Mülkiye Dergisi, 382(4): 41–85.
Dunford M, Liu W, 2019. Chinese perspectives on the Belt and Road Initiative. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 12(1): 145–167.
Erie M S, 2020. Chinese law and development. Harvard International Law Journal, 62(1).
Fisher O N, 2013. Historical legacies in rising powers. Critical Asian Studies, 45(3): 411–430.
Friedmann J, Weaver C, 1979. Territory and Function. The Evolution of Regional Planning. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Fröbel F, Heinrichs J, Kreye O, 1980. The New International Division of Labour: Structural Unemployment in Industrialised Countries and Industrialisation in Developing Countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gibbon P, Ponte S, 2005. Trading Down: Africa, Value Chains, and the Global Economy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Henry W Y, 2015. Regional development in the global economy: A dynamic perspective of strategic coupling in global production networks. Regional Science Policy & Practice, 7(1): 1–23.
Hess M, 2004. ‘Spatial’ relationships? Towards a reconceptualization of embeddedness. Progress in Human Geography, 28(2): 165–186.
Holland S, 1976. Capital Versus the Regions. London: Macmillan.
Horner R, 2014. Strategic decoupling, recoupling and global production networks: India’s pharmaceutical industry. Journal of Economic Geography, 14(6): 1117–1140.
Hung H F, 2015. The China Boom: Why China Will Not Rule the World. New York: Columbia University Press.
Hung H F, 2020. The US-China rivalry is about capitalist competition. Review of International Political Economy. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2020.1749105.
Ikenberry G J, 2011. Liberal Leviathan: The Origins, Crisis, and Transformation of the American World Order. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Jepson N, 2020. In China’s Wake: How the Commodity Boom Transformed Development Strategies in the global South. New York: Columbia University Press.
Kanai J, Schindler S, 2018. Peri-urban promises of connectivity: Linking project-led polycentrism to the infrastructure scramble. Environment & Planning A, 51(2): 302–322.
Kleibert J M, 2014. Strategic coupling in ‘next wave cities’: Local institutional actors and the offshore service sector in the Philippines. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 35(2): 245–260.
Kuik C-C, 2016. How do weaker states hedge? Unpacking ASEAN states’ alignment behavior towards China. Journal of Contemporary China, 25(100): 500–514.
Lampton D M, Ho S, Kuik C C, 2020. Rivers of Iron: Railroads and Chinese Power in Southeast Asia. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Liu H M, Fang C L, Miao Y et al., 2018. Spatio-temporal evolution of population and urbanization in the countries along the Belt and Road 1950–2050. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 28(7): 919–936.
Liu W D, Dunford M, Gao B Y, 2018. A discursive construction of the Belt and Road Initiative: From neo-liberal to inclusive globalization. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 28(9): 1199–1214.
Liu Z G, Dunford M, Liu W D, 2021. Coupling national geo-political economic strategies and the Belt and Road Initiative: The China-Belarus Great Stone Industrial Park. Political Geography, 84: 102296.
Liu Z G, Schindler S, Liu W D, 2020. Demystifying Chinese overseas investment in infrastructure: Port development, the Belt and Road Initiative and regional development. Journal of Transport Geography, 87: 102812.
Mackinnon D, 2012. Beyond strategic coupling: Reassessing the firm-region nexus in global production networks. Journal of Economic Geography, 12(1): 227–245.
Martin R, Rowthorn B, 1986. The Geography of De-industrialisation. The Geography of De-industrialisation. London: Macmillan.
Mayer M, Zhang X, 2020. Theorizing China-world integration: Sociospatial reconfigurations and the modern silk roads. Review of International Political Economy, (3): 1–30.
Miao J T, 2018. Parallelism and evolution in transnational policy transfer networks: The case of Sino-Singapore Suzhou Industrial Park (sip). Regional Studies, 52(9): 1191–1200.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Republic of Turkey, 2020a. Turkey’s Multilateral Transportation Policy (Ministerial Brief). http://www.mfa.gov.tr/turkey_s-multilateral-transportation-policy.en.mfa, accessed Oct 13, 2020.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Republic of Turkey, 2020b. Türkiye-Çin Halk Cumhuriyeti Ekonomik İlişkileri (Ministerial Brief). http://www.mfa.gov.tr/turkiye-cin-halk-cumhuriyeti-ekonomik-iliskileri.tr.mfa, accessed Oct 13, 2020.
Öncü E, 2007. ‘Hızlı Tren’ ‘Sürat Demiryolu’na Karşı! Kongre Sempozyum Bildiriler Kitabı (7. Ulaştırma Kongresi), İMO: Ankara, 271–295.
Peck J, Tickell A, 2002. Neoliberalizing space. Antipode, 34(3): 380–404.
Pettis M, 2013. The Great Rebalancing: Trade, Conflict, and the Perilous Road Ahead for the World Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Phelps N A, Waley P, 2004. Capital versus the districts: A tale of one multinational company’s attempt to disembed itself. Economic Geography, 80(2): 191–215.
Piore M, Sabel C, 1984. The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity. New York: Basic
Plokhy S, 2014. The Last Empire: The Final Days of the Soviet Union. London: Oneworld Publications.
Pomfret R, 2019. The Eurasian Land Bridge: Linking regional value chains along the new Silk Road. Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society, 12(1): 45–56.
Rodrik D, 2016. Premature deindustrialization. Journal of Economic Growth, 21(1): 1–33.
Schindler S, Kanai J M, 2019. Getting the territory right: Infrastructure-led development and the re-emergence of spatial planning strategies. Regional Studies, 55(1): 40–51.
Schindler S, Gillespie T, Banks N et al., 2020. Deindustrialization in cities of the Global South. Area, Development and Policy, 5(3): 283–304.
Tanrisever O F 2016. Turkey: Rising power or emerging dream? In: Dutkiewicz P, Salwa R (eds.). Eurasian Integration: The View from Within. London: Routledge.
Tooze A, 2018. Crashed: How a Decade of Financial Crises Changed the World. New York: Allen Lane.
Üzümcü A, Akdeniz S, 2014. Yeni İpek Yolu: TRACECA ve Bakü-Tiflis-Kars Demiryolu Projesi. Avrasya Etüdleri, 45(1): 171–199.
Wright R, 2001. Clinton’s one big idea. New York Times, January 16.
Ye C, Li S M, Zhuang L et al., 2020. A comparison and case analysis between domestic and overseas industrial parks of China since the Belt and Road Initiative. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 30(8): 1266–1282.
Yilmaz G, Eliküçük Yıldırım N, 2020. Authoritarian diffusion or cooperation? Turkey’s emerging engagement with China. Democratization, 27(7): 1202–1220.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Foundation
Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences, No.XDA20010102; National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41871115, No.41530751; British Academy Newton Advanced Fellowship, No.NAF2R2/100172
Author
Seth Schindler, Senior Lecturer, specialized in urban development and transformation, specialized in urban geography and regional studies.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schindler, S., Bayirbağ, M.K. & Gao, B. Incorporating the Istanbul-Ankara high-speed railway into the Belt and Road Initiative: Negotiation, institutional alignment and regional development. J. Geogr. Sci. 31, 747–762 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-021-1869-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-021-1869-1