Skip to main content

Changing Regional Order and Railway Diplomacy in Southeast Asia with a Case Study of Thailand

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Mapping China’s ‘One Belt One Road’ Initiative

Part of the book series: International Political Economy Series ((IPES))

Abstract

Laurids S. Lauridsen applies a Chinese proverb “two tigers cannot occupy the same mountain” to describe the situation related to the stronger participation of China in the evolving regional order. The author sees an emerging regional situation in which the One Belt One Road (OBOR) initiative has taken regional competition and infrastructure diplomacy to an elevated level. By examining an empirical case of high-speed railway projects in Thailand, this chapter seeks to analyse regional rivalry between Japan and China, and the evolving alternative regional order in terms of tangible forms of infrastructure development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    In 2007, new economic corridors were added and special economic zones at border areas were programmed. Of relevance for this paper was a new Southern Coastal Corridor linking the Gulf of Thailand with the Andaman Sea (JICA 2016; Mazza 2015).

  2. 2.

    This strange procedure was due public concern about high-speed (Interview C). The following interviews were made during fieldwork in late February 2016: A: Dr. Pichet Kunadhamraks, Office of Transport Planning (OTP), Ministry of Transport (MoT); B: Danucha Pichayanan, Senior Advisor for Policy and Plan, Infrastructure project office, the National Economic and Social Planning Board (NESDB). C: Former MoT public official; D: Consultant George Abonyi; E: Professor Chulacheeb Chinwanno, Department of Political Science, Thammasat University.

  3. 3.

    On the other hand, by having Nakhon Ratchasima as the terminus, the Thai side still have some leverage in relation to China for whom the HSR line makes little sense OBOR-wise if the Nakhon Ratchasima – Nong Khai HSR route (yellow line 4 in Fig. 9.1) is not constructed.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laurids S. Lauridsen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lauridsen, L.S. (2019). Changing Regional Order and Railway Diplomacy in Southeast Asia with a Case Study of Thailand. In: Xing, L. (eds) Mapping China’s ‘One Belt One Road’ Initiative. International Political Economy Series. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92201-0_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics