Abstract
In order to improve airfoil performance under different flight conditions and to make the performance insensitive to off-design condition at the same time, a multi-objective optimization approach considering robust design has been developed and applied to airfoil design. Non-uniform rational B-spline (NURBS) representation is adopted in airfoil design process, control points and related weights around airfoil are used as design variables. Two airfoil representation cases show that the NURBS method can get airfoil geometry with max geometry error less than 0.0019. By using six-sigma robust approach in multi-objective airfoil design, each sub-objective function of the problem has robustness property. By adopting multi-objective genetic algorithm that is based on non-dominated sorting, a set of non-dominated airfoil solutions with robustness can be obtained in the design. The optimum robust airfoil can be traded off and selected in these non-dominated solutions by design tendency. By using the above methods, a multi-objective robust optimization was conducted for NASA SC0712 airfoil. After performing robust airfoil optimization, the mean value of drag coefficient at Ma0.7–0.8 and the mean value of lift coefficient at post stall regime (Ma0.3) have been improved by 12.2% and 25.4%. By comparing the aerodynamic force coefficients of optimization result, it shows that: different from single robust airfoil design which just improves the property of drag divergence at Ma0.7–0.8, multi-objective robust design can improve both the drag divergence property at Ma0.7–0.8 and stall property at low speed. The design cases show that the multi-objective robust design method makes the airfoil performance robust under different off-design conditions.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Painchaud-Ouellet S, Tribes C, Trépanier J Y, et al. Airfoil shape optimization ouUsing NURBS representation under thickness constraint. AIAA 2004-1095, 2004
Park G J, Lee T H, Lee K H, et al. Robust design: An overview. AIAA J, 2006, 44(1): 181–191
Li W, Huyse L, Padula S, et al. Robust airfoil optimization to achieve consistent drag reduction over a Mach range. NASA/CR-2001-211042, 2001
Shimoyama K, Oyama A, Fujiii K. Development of multi-objective six-sigma approach for robust design optimization. J Aerospace Comp, Inf Comm, 2008, 5(8): 215–233
Shimoyama K, Oyama A, Fujii K. Multi-objective six sigma approach applied to robust airfoil design for Mars airplane. AIAA 2007-1966, 2007
Zhong X P, Ding J F, Li W J, et al. Robust airfoil optimization with multi-objective estimation of distribution algorithm. Chinese J Aeronaut, 2008, 21(4): 289–295
Lepine J, Guibault F, Trepanier J Y. Optimized nonuniform rational B-spline geometrical representation for aerodynamic design of wings. AIAA J, 2001, 39(11): 2033–2041
Hager J O, Eyi S, Lee K D. Multi-point design of transonic airfoils using optimization. AIAA 92-4225, 1992
Coello C, Lamont G, Veldhuizen D. Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi-objective Problems. Stanford: Springer, 2007. 62–91
Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, et al. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2002, 6(2): 182–197
Sobieczky H. Parametric airfoils and wings. Notes Num Fluid Mech, 1998, 68: 71–88
Song W B, Keane A J. A Study of shape parameterisation methods for airfoil optimisation. AIAA 2004-4482, 2004
Lepine J, Trepanier J Y. Wing aerodynamic design using an optimized NURBS geometrical representation. AIAA 2000-0699, 2000
Piegl L, Tiller W. The NURBS Book. Berlin: Springer, 1995. 117–124
Kumano T, Jesong S, Obayashi S, et al. Multidisciplinary design optimization of wing shape for a small jet aircraft using Kriging model. AIAA 2006-932, 2006
Takenaka K, Obayashi S, Nakahashi K, et al. The application of MDO technologies to the design of a high performance small jet aircraft lessons learned and some practical concerns. AIAA 2005-4797, 2005
Cook P H, McDonald M A, Firmin M C P. Aerofoil RAE 2822-pressure distributions, and boundary layer and wake measurements. Experimental Data Base for Computer Program Assessment. AGARD Report AR 138, 1979
Simpson T W, Mauery T M, Korte J J, et al. Comparison of response surface and Kriging models for multidisciplinary design optimization. AIAA-98-4755, 1998
Koch P N, Simpson T W, Allen J K, et al. Statistical approximations for multidisciplinary design optimization: The problem of size. J Aircraft, 1999, 36(1): 275–286
Raymer D P. Aircraft design: a conceptual approach [M]. Washington DC: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1989. 451–489
Harris C D. NASA supercritical airfoils. NASA Technical Paper, TP-2969, 1990
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liang, Y., Cheng, X., Li, Z. et al. Multi-objective robust airfoil optimization based on non-uniform rational B-spline (NURBS) representation. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 53, 2708–2717 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-010-4075-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-010-4075-4