Abstract
Populus euphratica is a dominant tree species in riparian Tugai forests and forms a natural barrier that maintains the stability of local oases in arid inland river basins. Despite being critical information for local environmental protection and recovery, establishing the specific spatial distribution of P. euphratica has rarely been attempted via precise and reliable species distribution models in such areas. In this research, the potential geographic distribution of P. euphratica in the Heihe River Basin was simulated with MaxEnt software based on species occurrence data and 29 environmental variables. The result showed that in the Heihe River Basin, 820 km2 of land primarily distributed along the banks of the lower reaches of the river is a suitable habitat for P. euphratica. We built other MaxEnt models based on different environmental variables and another eight models employing different mathematical algorithms based on the same 29 environmental variables to demonstrate the superiority of this method. MaxEnt based on 29 environmental variables performed the best among these models, as it precisely described the essential characteristics of the distribution of P. euphratica forest land. This study verified that MaxEnt can serve as an effective tool for species distribution in extremely arid regions with sufficient and reliable environmental variables. The results suggest that there may be a larger area of P. euphratica forest distribution in the study area and that ecological conservation and management of P. euphratica should prioritize suitable habitat. This research provides valuable insights for the conservation and management of degraded P. euphratica riparian forests.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Adhikari D, Barik S K, Upadhaya K. 2012. Habitat distribution modelling for reintroduction of Ilex khasiana Purk., a critically endangered tree species of northeastern India. Ecol Eng, 40: 37–43
Aishan T, Halik Ü, Cyffka B, Kuba M, Abliz A, Baidourela A. 2013. Monitoring the hydrological and ecological response to water diversion in the lower reaches of the Tarim River, Northwest China. Quat Int, 311: 155–162
Aishan T, Halik Ü, Kurban A, Cyffka B, Kuba M, Betz F, Keyimu M. 2015. Eco-morphological response of floodplain forests (Populus euphratica Oliv.) to water diversion in the lower Tarim River, Northwest China. Environ Earth Sci, 73: 533–545
Allouche O, Tsoar A, Kadmon R. 2006. Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models: Prevalence, kappa and the true skill statistic (TSS). J Appl Ecol, 43: 1223–1232
Anderson R P. 2013. A framework for using niche models to estimate impacts of climate change on species distributions. Ann New York Acad Sci, 1297: 8–28
Andriamparany J N, Brinkmann K, Wiehle M, Jeannoda V, Buerkert A. 2015. Modelling the distribution of four Dioscorea species on the Mahafaly Plateau of south-western Madagascar using biotic and abiotic variables. Agric Ecosyst Environ, 212: 38–48
Araújo M B, Luoto M. 2007. The importance of biotic interactions for modelling species distributions under climate change. Glob Ecol Biogeogr, 16: 743–753
Barbet-Massin M, Jiguet F, Albert C H, Thuiller W. 2012. Selecting pseudo-absences for species distribution models: How, where and how many? Methods Ecol Evol, 3: 327–338
Barbet-Massin M, Rome Q, Muller F, Perrard A, Villemant C, Jiguet F. 2013. Climate change increases the risk of invasion by the Yellowlegged hornet. Biol Conserv, 157: 4–10
Bradter U, Kunin W E, Altringham J D, Thom T J, Benton T G. 2013. Identifying appropriate spatial scales of predictors in species distribution models with the random forest algorithm. Methods Ecol Evol, 4: 167–174
Brown C J, O’Connor M I, Poloczanska E S, Schoeman D S, Buckley L B, Burrows M T, Duarte C M, Halpern B S, Pandolfi J M, Parmesan C, Richardson A J. 2016. Ecological and methodological drivers of species’ distribution and phenology responses to climate change. Glob Change Biol, 22: 1548–1560
Bucklin D N, Basille M, Benscoter A M, Brandt L A, Mazzotti F J, Romañach S S, Speroterra C, Watling J I. 2015. Comparing species distribution models constructed with different subsets of environmental predictors. Divers Distrib, 21: 23–35
Busby J R. 1991. BIOCLIM—A bioclimate analysis and prediction system. In: Margules C R, Austin M P, eds. Nature Conservation: Cost Effective Biological Surveys and Data Analysis. Victoria: CSIRO. 64–68
Cheng G, Li X, Zhao W, Xu Z, Feng Q, Xiao S, Xiao H. 2014. Integrated study of the water-ecosystem-economy in the Heihe River Basin. Nat Sci Rev, 1: 413–428
Edwards Jr T C, Cutler D R, Zimmermann N E, Geiser L, Moisen G G. 2006. Effects of sample survey design on the accuracy of classification tree models in species distribution models. Ecol Model, 199: 132–141
Elith J, Leathwick J R. 2009. Species distribution models: Ecological explanation and prediction across space and time. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst, 40: 677–697
Escalante T, Rodríguez-Tapia G, Linaje M, Illoldi-Rangel P, González-López R. 2013. Identification of areas of endemism from species distribution models: Threshold selection and Nearctic mammals. TIP, 16: 5–17
Fang M, Li X. 2016. Paleoclimate data assimilation: Its motivation, progress and prospects. Sci China Earth Sci, 59: 1817–1826
Fei S, Yu F. 2016. Quality of presence data determines species distribution model performance: A novel index to evaluate data quality. Landsc Ecol, 31: 31–42
Ficetola G F, Thuiller W, Padoa-Schioppa E. 2009. From introduction to the establishment of alien species: Bioclimatic differences between presence and reproduction localities in the slider turtle. Divers Distrib, 15: 108–116
Guo Y, Wei H, Lu C, Gao B, Gu W. 2016. Predictions of potential geographical distribution and quality of Schisandra sphenanthera under climate change. PeerJ, 4: e2554
Heikkinen R K, Luoto M, Araújo M B, Virkkala R, Thuiller W, Sykes M T. 2006. Methods and uncertainties in bioclimatic envelope modelling under climate change. Prog Phys Geogr, 30: 751–777
Hijmans R J, Cameron S E, Parra J L, Jones P G, Jarvis A. 2005. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol, 25: 1965–1978
Hu X, Lu L, Li X, Wang J, Lu X. 2015. Ejin oasis land use and vegetation change between 2000 and 2011: The role of the Ecological Water Diversion Project. Energies, 8: 7040–7057
Keyimu M, Halik Ü, Betz F, Dulamsuren C. 2018. Vitality variation and population structure of a riparian forest in the lower reaches of the Tarim River, NW China. J Forest Res, 29: 749–760
Kuemmerlen M, Schmalz B, Guse B, Cai Q, Fohrer N, Jähnig S C. 2014. Integrating catchment properties in small scale species distribution models of stream macroinvertebrates. Ecol Model, 277: 77–86
Li W, Si J, Yu T, Li X. 2016. Response of Populus euphratica Oliv. sap flow to environmental variables for a desert riparian forest in the Heihe River Basin, Northwest China. J Arid Land, 8: 591–603
Li X, Lu L, Cheng G, Xiao H. 2001. Quantifying landscape structure of the Heihe River Basin, north-west China using FRAGSTATS. J Arid Environ, 48: 521–535
Li X, Nan Z, Cheng G, Ding Y, Wu L, Wang L, Wang J, Ran Y, Li H, Pan X, Zhu Z. 2011. Toward an improved data stewardship and service for environmental and ecological science data in West China. Int J Digital Earth, 4: 347–359
Liu F, Rossiter D G, Song X D, Zhang G L, Yang R M, Zhao Y G, Li D C, Ju B. 2016. A similarity-based method for three-dimensional prediction of soil organic matter concentration. Geoderma, 263: 254–263
Lu C Y, Gu W, Dai A H, Wei H Y. 2012. Assessing habitat suitability based on geographic information system (GIS) and fuzzy: A case study of Schisandra sphenanthera Rehd. et Wils. in Qinling Mountains, China. Ecol Model, 242: 105–115
Marmion M, Luoto M, Heikkinen R K, Thuiller W. 2009a. The performance of state-of-the-art modelling techniques depends on geographical distribution of species. Ecol Model, 220: 3512–3520
Marmion M, Parviainen M, Luoto M, Heikkinen R K, Thuiller W. 2009b. Evaluation of consensus methods in predictive species distribution modelling. Divers Distrib, 15: 59–69
Márquez A L, Real R, Olivero J, Estrada A. 2011. Combining climate with other influential factors for modelling the impact of climate change on species distribution. Clim Change, 108: 135–157
Merow C, Smith M J, Silander Jr J A. 2013. A practical guide to MaxEnt for modeling species’ distributions: What it does, and why inputs and settings matter. Ecography, 36: 1058–1069
Naimi B, Araújo M B. 2016. Sdm: A reproducible and extensible R platform for species distribution modelling. Ecography, 39: 368–375
Pan X, Li X, Cheng G, Li H, He X. 2015. Development and evaluation of a river-basin-scale high spatio-temporal precipitation data set using the WRF model: A case study of the Heihe River Basin. Remote Sens, 7: 9230–9252
Pan X, Li X, Shi X, Han X, Luo L, Wang L. 2012. Dynamic downscaling of near-surface air temperature at the basin scale using WRF—A case study in the Heihe River Basin, China. Front Earth Sci, 6: 314–323
Pan X, Li X, Yang K, He J, Zhang Y, Han X. 2014. Comparison of downscaled precipitation data over a mountainous watershed: A case study in the Heihe River Basin. J Hydrometeorol, 15: 1560–1574
Peng X, Xiao S, Xiao H. 2013. Preliminary dendrochronological studies on Populus euphratica in the lower reaches of the Heihe River basin in northwest China. Dendrochronologia, 31: 242–249
Phillips S J, Anderson R P, Schapire R E. 2006. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol Model, 190: 231–259
Pliscoff P, Luebert F, Hilger H H, Guisan A. 2014. Effects of alternative sets of climatic predictors on species distribution models and associated estimates of extinction risk: A test with plants in an arid environment. Ecol Model, 288: 166–177
Ran Y H, Li X, Lu L, Li Z Y. 2012. Large-scale land cover mapping with the integration of multi-source information based on the Dempster–Shafer theory. Int J Geogr Inf Sci, 26: 169–191
Ray D, Behera M D, Jacob J. 2016. Predicting the distribution of rubber trees (Hevea brasiliensis) through ecological niche modelling with climate, soil, topography and socioeconomic factors. Ecol Res, 31: 75–91
Ridgeway G. 1999. The state of boosting. Comput Sci Stat, 31: 172–181
Rödder D, Lötters S. 2009. Niche shift versus niche conservatism? Climatic characteristics of the native and invasive ranges of the Mediterranean house gecko (Hemidactylus turcicus ). Glob Ecol Biogeogr, 18: 674–687
Rüger N, Schlüter M, Matthies M. 2005. A fuzzy habitat suitability index for Populus euphratica in the Northern Amudarya delta (Uzbekistan). Ecol Model, 184: 313–328
Song X D, Brus D J, Liu F, Li D C, Zhao Y G, Yang J L, Zhang G L. 2016. Mapping soil organic carbon content by geographically weighted regression: A case study in the Heihe River Basin, China. Geoderma, 261: 11–22
Tayierjiang A, Umut H, Arkin H, Bernd C, Christian O. 2011. Spatial distribution of Populus euphratica forests on Argan section in the lower reaches of Tarim River and its influencing factors (in Chinese). J Arid Land Resour Environ, 25: 156–160
Thuiller W, Lafourcade B, Engler R, Araújo M B. 2009. BIOMOD—A platform for ensemble forecasting of species distributions. Ecography, 32: 369–373
Tian Y, Zheng Y, Zheng C, Xiao H, Fan W, Zou S, Wu B, Yao Y, Zhang A, Liu J. 2015. Exploring scale-dependent ecohydrological responses in a large endorheic river basin through integrated surface water-groundwater modeling. Water Resour Res, 51: 4065–4085
Wang J H, Ge C M, Zhao J, Hu X L. 2014. Landuse/Landcover data in the down reaches of the Heihe River Basin in 2011. Cold and Arid Regions Sciences Data Center at Lanzhou (https://doi.org/westdc.westgis.ac.cn
Wang Y Y, Zhong B, Shang F J. 2016. An automatic method to extract populus euphratica forest in a large area using remote sensing. In: 4th International Conference on Mechanical Materials and Manufacturing Engineering, Wuhan
Yang F, Zhang G L, Yang J L, Li D C, Zhao Y G, Liu F, Yang R M, Yang F. 2014. Organic matter controls of soil water retention in an alpine grassland and its significance for hydrological processes. J Hydrol, 519: 3086–3093
Yang R M, Zhang G L, Liu F, Lu Y Y, Yang F, Yang F, Yang M, Zhao Y G, Li D C. 2016. Comparison of boosted regression tree and random forest models for mapping topsoil organic carbon concentration in an alpine ecosystem. Ecol Indic, 60: 870–878
Yang X Q, Kushwaha S P S, Saran S, Xu J, Roy P S. 2013. Maxent modeling for predicting the potential distribution of medicinal plant, Justicia adhatoda L. in Lesser Himalayan foothills. Ecol Eng, 51: 83–87
Yi Y, Cheng X, Yang Z F, Zhang S H. 2016. Maxent modeling for predicting the potential distribution of endangered medicinal plant (H. riparia Lour) in Yunnan, China. Ecol Eng, 92: 260–269
Yuan H S, Wei Y L, Wang X G. 2015. Maxent modeling for predicting the potential distribution of Sanghuang, an important group of medicinal fungi in China. Fungal Ecol, 17: 140–145
Zhang X, Nan Z, Wu J, Du E, Wang T, You Y. 2012. Mountain permafrost distribution modeling using multivariate adaptive regression spline (MARS) in the Wenquan area over the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Sci Cold Arid Regions, 4: 361–370
Zhao W Z, Chang X L, Li Q Y. 2005. Artificial water diversion effects of HeiheRiver on Populus euphratica Oliv. Desert riparian forests in Ejina. Acta Ecol Sin, 25: 1987–1993
Zhu Y, Ren L, Skaggs T H, Lü H, Yu Z, Wu Y, Fang X. 2009. Simulation of Populus euphratica root uptake of groundwater in an arid woodland of the Ejina Basin, China. Hydrol Process, 23: 2460–2469
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 91425303), the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. XDA20100104) and the 13th Five-year Informatization Plan of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. XXH13505–06).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Guo, Y., Li, X., Zhao, Z. et al. Modeling the distribution of Populus euphratica in the Heihe River Basin, an inland river basin in an arid region of China. Sci. China Earth Sci. 61, 1669–1684 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-017-9241-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-017-9241-2