Abstract
The aim of this study was to examine metacognition in computer-supported collaborative problem solving. The subjects of the study were 13-year-old Finnish secondary school students (N = 16). The Knowledge Forum learning environment was used to support student pairs’ problem-solving task involving polygons in a geometry course. The data consist of the student pairs’ posted computer notes (n = 95). To examine metacognition in a social context in the networked discussions, the features and patterns of networked interaction, the metacognitive content of the computer notes and their relations were examined. To examine the features of networked interaction, the social network analysis measures were used. The patterns of networked interaction were displayed with the multidimensional scaling technique. In the analysis, metacognitive contents of the computer notes were categorized as metacognitive knowledge, metacognitive skills, and not metacognitive. Further, with the correspondence analysis, we examined how the student pairs’ metacognitive activity was distributed. The results of the study revealed that the metacognitive activity varied among participants, although some aspects of metacognition such as planning were never encountered. It was found that there is a relation between metacognitive activity and the features of interaction. The student pairs who monitored and evaluated the ongoing discussions had a strategically optimal position in the communication network.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Aleven, V., McLaren, B., Roll, I., & Koedinger, K. (2004). Toward tutoring help-seeking. Applying cognitive modeling to meta-cognitive skills. In J. C. Lester, R. M. Vicari, & F. Paraguacu (Eds.), Intelligent tutoring systems, 7th international conference, ITS 2004 (pp. 227–239). Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer.
Artz, A. F., & Armour-Thomas, E. (1992). Development of cognitive-metacognitive framework for protocol analysis of mathematical problem solving in small groups. Cognition and Instruction, 9, 137–175.
Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., Soloway, E., & Krajick, J. (1996). Learning with peers: from small group interaction to collaborative communities. Educational Researcher, 25(8), 37–40.
Brown, A. L. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation and other mysterious mechanisms. In F. Weinert, & R. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation and understanding (pp. 65–115). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Brown, A. L. (1994). The advancement of learning. Educational Researcher, 23(8), 4–12.
Brown, A. L., Ash, D., Rutherford, M., Nakagawa, K., Gordon, A., & Campione, J. (1996). Distributed expertise in the classroom. In G. Salomon (Ed.). Distributed cognitions. Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 188–218). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brown, A. L., Bransford, J., Ferrara, R., & Campione, J. (1983). Learning, remembering and understanding. In P. Mussen (Ed.). Handbook of child psychology 3 (pp. 77–166). J. Flavell & E. Markman (Vol. Eds). New York: Wiley.
Chi, M. T. H. (1997). Quantifying qualitative analysis of verbal data: a practical guide. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6(3), 271–315.
Choi, I., Land, S., & Turgeon, J. (2005). Scaffolding peer-questioning strategies to facilitate metacognition during online small group discussion. Instructional Science, 33, 483–511.
Cohen, A., & Scardamalia, M. (1998). Discourse about ideas: monitoring and regulation in face-to-face and computer-mediated environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 6(2), 93–113.
Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37–46.
Davidson, J. E., & Sternberg, R. J. (1998). Smart Problem Solving: How Metacognition Helps. In D. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practise (pp. 47–68). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
De Corte, E., Verschaffel, L., Entwistle, N., & Van Merriëboer, J. (2003) Powerful learning environments: unravelling basic components and dimensions. Amsterdam: Pergamon.
Dillenbourg, P., & Traum, D. (2006). Sharing solutions: persistence and grounding in multimodal collaborative problem solving. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(1), 121–151.
Flavell, J. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911.
Garofalo, J., & Lester, F. K. Jr. (1985). Metacognition, cognitive monitoring, and mathematical performance. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 16(3), 163–176.
Goos, M., Galbraith, P., & Renshaw, P. (2002). Socially mediated metacognition: creating collaborative zones of proximal development in small group problem solving. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49, 193–223.
Greenacre, M. (1984). Theory and applications of correspondence analysis. Orlando: Academic.
Greenacre, M., & Blasius, J. (1994). Correspondence analysis in the social sciences. San Diego: Academic.
Hurme, T.-R., & Järvelä, S. (2005). Students’ activity in computer supported collaborative problem solving in mathematics. International Journal of Computers for mathematical learning, 10, 49–73.
Iiskala, T., Vauras, M., & Lehtinen, E. (2004). Socially-shared metacognition? Hellenic Journal of Psychology 1, 147–178.
Järvelä, S., Veermans, M., & Leinonen, P. (2006). Investigating students' engagement in a computer-supported inquiry—a process-oriented analysis. Submitted.
Jermann, P. R. (2004). Computer support for interaction regulation in collaborative problem solving. Unpublished doctoral thesis. Faculty of psychology and educational sciences, Geneva University, Switzerland. Available online: http://craftsrv1.epfl.ch/~colin/thesis-jermann.pdf (2nd June, 2006).
Jost, J. T., Kruglanski, A. W., & Nelson, T. O. (1998). Social metacognition: an expansionist review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(2), 137–154.
King, A. (1990). Enchancing peer interaction and learning in the classroom through reciprocal questioning. American Educational Research Journal, 27(4), 664–687.
Koschmann, T., Hall, R., & Miyake, N. (2002). CSCL 2. Carrying forward the conversation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Lehtinen, E. (2003). Computer-supported collaborative learning: An approach to powerful learning environments. In E. De Corte, L. Verschaffel, N. Entwistle, & J. Van Merriëboer (Eds.), Powerful learning environments: Unravelling basic components and dimensions (pp. 35–54). Amsterdam: Pergamon.
Levine, J. L., Resnick, L. B., & Higgins, E. T. (1993). Social foundations of cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 585–612.
Lipponen, L. (2002). Exploring foundations for computer-supported collaborative learning. In G. Stahl (Ed.). Computer-supported collaborative learning: foundations for a CSCL community. Proceedings of the Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 2002 Conference (pp. 72–81). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Mäkitalo, K. (2006). Interaction in Online Learning Environments: How to support collaborative activities in higher education settings. Unpublished doctoral thesis. Institute for Educational Research, Jyväskylä University, Finland.
Mevarech, Z., & Fridkin, S. (2006). The effects of IMPROVE on mathematical knowledge, mathematical reasoning and metacognition. Metacognition and Learning, 1, 85–97.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE.
Newman, R. S. (1994). Adaptive help seeking: A strategy of self-regulated learning. In D. H. Schunk, & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance: issues and educational applications (pp. 283–301). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Nurmela, K., Lehtinen, E., & Palonen, T. (1999). Evaluating CSCL log files by social network analysis. In C. Hoadley, & J. Roschelle (Eds.), Computer support for collaborative learning (pp. 434–444). Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.
Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child. New York: Basic Books.
Piaget, J. (1978). The development of thought: equilibration of cognitive structures. Oxford: Blackwell.
Ploetzner, R., Dillenbourg, P., Preier, M., & Traum, D. (1999). Learning by explaining to oneself and to others. In P. Dillenbourgh (Ed.). Collaborative learning: cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 103–121). Amsterdam: Pergamon.
Resnick, L. B., Levine, J. M., & Teasley, S. D. (1993). Perspectives on socially shared cognition. Washington: American Psychological Association.
Salomon, G., & Perkins, D. N. (1998). Individual and social aspects of learning. Review of Research in Education, 23, 1–24.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1996a). Adaptation and understanding. A case for new cultures of schooling. In S. Vosniadau, E. De Corte, R. Glaser & H. Mandl (Eds.), International perspectives on the design of technology-supported learning environments (pp. 149–164). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1996b). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. In T. Koschmann (Ed.), CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm (pp. 249–268). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1987). What’s All the Fuss About Metacognition? In A. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Cognitive science and mathematics education (pp. 189–215). Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: problem solving, metacognition, and sense-making in mathematics. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook for Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, (pp. 334–370). New York: Macmillan.
Schraw, G. (1998). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Instructional Science 26, 113–125.
Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 460–475.
Scott, J. (1991). Social network analysis: a handbook. London: SAGE.
Vauras, M., Iiskala, T., Kajamies, A., Kinnunen, R., & Lehtinen, E. (2003). Shared regulation and motivation of collaborating peers: a case analysis. Psychologia, 46(1), 19–37.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Webb, N. (1989). Peer interaction and learning in small groups. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 21–40.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hurme, TR., Palonen, T. & Järvelä, S. Metacognition in joint discussions: an analysis of the patterns of interaction and the metacognitive content of the networked discussions in mathematics. Metacognition Learning 1, 181–200 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-006-9792-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-006-9792-5