Abstract
Purpose
Anammox bacteria have been widely investigated in both natural aquatic habitats and wastewater treatment reactors. However, their distribution in agricultural ecosystems which receive high reactive nitrogen input is hardly known. This study aims to examine the distribution and diversity of anammox bacteria in different Chinese paddy soils and along soil profile horizons.
Materials and methods
DNA was extracted from paddy soils which were collected from ten sites and along four soil depth horizons (0–20, 20–40, 40–60, 60–80 cm). Community structure and diversity of the anammox bacteria were analyzed using cloning and sequencing methods by targeting 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes. Quantitative PCR was conducted to study the abundance of anammox hzsB genes.
Results and discussion
Anammox bacterial 16S rRNA genes were not detected in most of the surface soil profile layers but present in all subsurface and deep horizons. Two genera, Candidatus Brocadia and Candidatus Kuenenia, were the only groups detected, and the former was predominant in tested soils. A site-specific distribution pattern of anammox bacteria and significant relationship between anammox bacteria community composition and soil pH and ammonium concentration were observed. The abundance of anammox bacteria hzsB gene ranged from 3.78 × 104 to 1.64 × 107 per gram of dry soil in all soils and significantly varied along the soil profile horizons.
Conclusions
Anammox bacteria were widely distributed in paddy soils, especially in subsurface and profile depth horizons. Candidatus Brocadia and Candidatus Kuenenia were the dominating anammox groups in the tested soils, and the two genera showed a site-specific distribution pattern across large Chinese paddy soil areas and along soil depth profiles.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Biogeochemistry of nitrogen (N) is of great interest since N is an essential element to all lives. Microorganisms involving in nitrification and denitrification have been widely investigated due to their high activity and broad distribution in the environment. Anaerobic ammonium-oxidizing (anammox) bacteria just have been known more recently since they were firstly found being responsible for the N2 loss from wastewater bioreactor by mediating the anaerobic oxidation of ammonia coupled nitrate reduction (Mulder et al. 1995). Later on, anammox bacteria were detected widely in natural ecosystems like marine sediments, oxygen minimum zones, and fresh water habitats (Dong et al. 2009; Lam et al. 2009; Crowe et al. 2012) and were suggested potentially responsible for the 50 % of nitrogen loss in South Atlantic midwaters (Kuypers et al. 2005). Understanding of the biodiversity and community structure of anammox bacteria could further extend our knowledge to the mechanism of nitrogen cycle.
To date, all known anammox bacteria are the members of the phylum Planctomycetes and five genera have been discovered, including Candidatus Anammoxoglobus, Candidatus Brocadia, Candidatus Jettenia, Candidatus Kuenenia, and Candidatus Scalindua (Hirsch et al. 2011). As anammox bacteria are highly O2-intolerant anaerobic microbes (Jetten et al. 2009), previous research mainly focused on aquatic environments like river sediments and oceans where the anoxic condition is ubiquitous (Schmid et al. 2005, 2007; Hirsch et al. 2011). A number of molecular ecology investigation based on 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene have revealed that the distributions of five known anammox genera were habitat-specific. Candidatus Scalindua was frequently found in the estuarine and deep-sea ecosystem, and the other four genera were mainly detected in water treatment reactors, freshwater sediments, and various types of terrestrial environments (Humbert et al. 2010). More recently, anammox bacteria have been detected in terrestrial ecosystem and showed habitat-specific distribution pattern too, as Candidatus Scalindua was observed predominant in the transitional zone of marine and terrestrial territories (Humbert et al. 2010; Schmid et al. 2007), and the other four genera were detected in agricultural fields, wetlands, and freshwater estuaries (Wang et al. 2012b; Long et al. 2013; Shen et al. 2013).
Paddy cultivation is one of the most important activities in agricultural production in China. Paddy soil therefore represents a large area of artificial wetlands under the frequent waterlog management and has being received high level of nitrogen fertilizer input, and the pathways of nitrogen loss from paddy soil have received great concerns due to its negative environmental influence (Zhu and Chen 2002). Although denitrification has been identified as a main soil nitrogen loss pathway under anoxic conditions (Risgaard-Petersen et al. 2005; Long et al. 2013), previous studies have indicated that the anammox process in either marine, freshwater, or terrestrial agriculture ecosystems cannot be ignored (Risgaard-Petersen et al. 2005; Crowe et al. 2012; Long et al. 2013). In a recent study in a paddy soil that received high slurry manure input, anammox was suggested to be responsible for 4–37 % of N2 production, and Candidatus Brocadia was mainly detected in deep profile soils while Candidatus Anammoxoglobus, Candidatus Jettenia, and Candidatus Kuenenia were discovered in surface soil (Zhu et al. 2011). More recently, Candidatus Scalindua was identified as a dominant group in a molecular ecology survey in paddy soils in northeastern China (Wang and Gu 2013). These studies revealed the presence of anammox bacteria in agricultural soils, while the distribution and diversity of anammox bacteria in a large scale of agricultural fields are still less known.
Therefore, examining the diversity and distribution of anammox bacterial community among different soil types and soil depths is of significance to estimate the potential contribution of the anammox process to the whole nitrogen cycle in paddy soil system. To address these concerns, in this study, ten soil profiles incorporating four soil horizons (i.e., 0–20, 20–40, 40–60, and 60–80 cm with representative letters A–D, respectively) were collected from ten major rice-producing areas across the northeastern (Panjin (PJ1 and PJ2) and Shenyang (SH)), eastern (Jiaxing (JX) and Shangyu (SY)), central (Jingzhou (JZ), Xianning (XN), and Xiantao (XT)), and southern (Hengyang (HY) and Miluo (ML)) China. The diversity of anammox bacteria in these soils was investigated by cloning and sequencing 16S rRNA genes, and the abundance was estimated by quantifying hzsB genes.
2 Material and methods
2.1 Soil sampling site and physiochemical analysis
Soil samples were collected during the rice-growing period from ten rice plantation areas in July, 2010. The information about sampling sites is listed in Table 1. Paddy soils were sampled along soil horizons at 0–20, 20–40, 40–60, and 60–80 cm. Soil samples for DNA extraction were dried in a vacuum freeze drier, and subsamples for soil properties analysis were stored at 4 °C. Detail methods of the soil physiochemical properties were referred to a previous work (Shen et al. 2008).
2.2 DNA extraction
Approximately 0.50-g soil (dry weight) was weighted for DNA extraction using a Power Soil DNA Isolation Kit (Mo Bio, Carlsbad, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. All DNA samples were then stored under −40 °C for further analysis.
2.3 PCR amplification of 16S rRNA genes
A nested PCR assay was conducted for the detection of anammox 16S rRNA genes. The first PCR amplification was performed in a 25 μl reaction with primer pair Pla46F/1037R (Schmid et al. 2011). PCR reaction contained 12.5 μl of 2× TAKARA premix (TaKaRa Bio Inc., Shiga, Japan), 0.25 μl of each primer (10 μM), 1 μl of DNA template (1–20 ng μl−1), and PCR water to a final volume of 25 μl. After the initial step, PCR amplification was further performed with the primer set Amx368F/Amx820R (Schmid et al. 2000) in a 50-μl reaction system containing 10× PCR buffer (Mg2+ plus) 5 μl, 2.5 mM dNTPs 4 μl, 0.5 μl of Ex Taq HS polymerase (TaKaRa Bio Inc., Shiga, Japan), 1 μl of 10-μM primer each, and 2 μl of 1000× diluted templates from the first amplification.
2.4 Construction of clone libraries, sequencing, and phylogenetic analysis
The obtained PCR products were purified using Wizard SV Gel and PCR Clean-up System (Promega, Madison, WI) and ligated into a pMD 18-T vector (TaKaRa Bio Inc., Shiga, Japan) at 4 °C overnight. The ligation was then transformed into E. coli competent cells (JM109, TaKaRa Bio Inc., Shiga, Japan). Approximately 30 positive colonies were randomly selected and then sequenced by automatic sequencer ABI3730 (Applied Biosystems, USA).
2.5 Quantitative PCR of hzsB genes
The abundance of anammox bacteria was estimated by quantifying hzsB gene with primer pair hzsB_396F (5′-ARGGHTGGGGHAGYTGGAAG-3′) and hzsB_742R (5′-GTYCCHACRTCATGVGTCTG-3′) (Wang et al. 2012a). Quantitative PCR reactions were conducted in 25-μl volume containing 12.5 μl of SYBR Green premix (TaKaRa Bio Inc., Shiga, Japan), 0.6 μl of each primer (10 μM), and 1 μl of DNA template (1–20 ng/μl). The touchdown PCR cycle was started with a 5-min denaturation at 95 °C, followed by five cycles of 95 °C for 1 min, 64 °C (decrease 1 °C each cycle) for 1 min, and 72 °C for 45 s. Then, it was continued with 35 cycles of 95 °C for 1 min, 59 °C for 1 min, 72 °C for 45 s, and a final 72 °C for 5 min. PCR product amplified with the same primer pair as above from the DNA template was cloned into a pMD 18-T vector (Takara); then, the positive clones were sequenced, and the plasmid DNA carrying the hzsB genes was extracted and purified. The concentration of the plasmid was then determined by NanoDrop, and the copy number of hzsB gene per microliter was calculated. The tenfold serial dilutions of the plasmid were utilized as standard for quantitative PCR.
2.6 Statistical analysis and phylogenetic analysis
By utilizing SPSS (version 19.0, IBM), Pearson correlation analysis was used to test the relationship between environmental factors and hzsB gene abundance, and Duncan test of one-way ANOVA was conducted to test the differences of hzsB abundance between soil profiles; P < 0.05 level was considered significant. The obtained clone sequences were analyzed manually using BLAST program in GenBank database. The sequences sharing more than 97 % identity were defined as one operation taxonomic unit (OTU), and then, one sequence for each anammox bacteria OTU and its closest clone from GenBank was chosen to construct the phylogenetic tree using the neighbor-joining method in MEGA 5 software with 1000 bootstraps (Kumar et al. 2008). The definition of OTUs and calculation of diversity indices were carried out using DOTUR program (Schloss and Handelsman 2005). The percentage of coverage of cloning libraries was calculated based on the equation C = [1 – (N s/N)] × 100 %, where C represents percentage of coverage, N denotes the amount of positive clones in one library, and N s is the number of clones that presents only once in the library (Table 2). CANOCO software (version 4.5, Microcomputer Power) was used for principal components analysis (PCA) and canonical correspondence analysis (CCA). Percentages of each OTUs occupied in all cloning library were used as the “species” dataset, and the measured soil physiochemical properties were utilized as environmental variables.
3 Results and discussion
3.1 Detection of anammox bacteria in paddy soils based on 16S rRNA genes
In total, 40 samples including 10 surface and 30 profile samples were used in this study. The target fragment was successfully amplified from 32 samples, while eight of ten layer A (0–10 cm) samples failed to get amplification except JZ-A and SH-A (Table 2). In total, 913 sequences were obtained from 32 cloning libraries and 789 sequences in 29 OTUs at 97 % sequence identity level were identified as anammox bacteria genera Candidatus Brocadia and Candidatus Kuenenia after BLASTing in GenBank and phylogenetic analysis (Fig. 1). OTU18 falling within Brocadia cluster was the most frequently detected which represented 141 sequences which was detected from eight sites, while 15 OTUs were only detected in one site (Fig. 1). The rest 124 sequences formed a new phylogenetic cluster far from the known anammox clusters within the phylum Planctomycetes in the phylogenetic tree (Fig. 1), and most of them showed 88–96 % identities to uncultured planctomycete clones in GenBank. These non-anammox bacteria sequences were mainly retrieved from two sites including ML-B, ML-C, SH-A, and SH-B but showed high diversity and represented 80 OTUs at 97 % sequence identity level. The non-specific amplification of anammox 16S rRNA gene implied the absence of known anammox bacteria in these samples, whether these planctomycete-related clones are potential anammox bacteria is of interest in future studies. Furthermore, cloning libraries dominated by known anammox bacteria presented coverage more than 90 %, and Shannon index ranged from 0 to 1.59, Simpson index 0 to 0.93, and Chao1 index from 1 to 5.5. In contrast, cloning libraries dominated with unknown bacteria showed much lower coverage and higher diversity (Table 2).
It has been proved that anammox bacteria are highly intolerant to oxygen and could hardly survive when the O2 concentration is higher than a certain level (Jetten et al. 2009). The concentration of O2 could decrease intensively along the paddy soil depth profile and steadily maintain the gradient over time. As a consequence, the distribution pattern of microbes that are sensitive to oxygen could be influenced by this gradient in paddy sediments (DeAngelis et al. 2010). It was observed that the relative contribution of anammox to total N2 production and the relative abundance of anammox bacteria varied greatly along the sediment profiles (Rooks et al. 2012). All these may explain the unsuccessful amplification of anammox 16S rRNA gene in most of the surface horizon of profiles, and the results suggested that there is a strong soil-oxygen gradient effect on the succession of vertical distribution of anammox bacteria in paddy soil horizons.
Among the 29 anammox OTUs, 18 OTUs were classified into Candidatus Brocadia and 11 OTUs into Candidatus Kuenenia, which accounted for 57.9 and 42.1 % of retrieved anammox bacteria sequences, respectively. No sequence was identified as Candidatus Scalindua, Candidatus Jettenia, and Candidatus Anammoxoglobus. Candidatus Brocadia was detected from nine out of ten sampling sites except in site PJ2. Though no any known anammox sequence was retrieved from horizons A, B, and C of site ML and horizons A and B of site SH, Candidatus Brocadia was largely discovered in the deeper horizons (layers C and D) from these two sites. Candidatus Kuenenia was found in six out of ten sites and was largely detected in SY, XN, PJ1, and PJ2. It was also the only anammox bacterial group detected in PJ2. The results were consistent with the observation of Humbert et al. showing that Candidatus Brocadia and Candidatus Kuenenia were more dominant than other groups in various terrestrial ecosystems (Humbert et al. 2010). Furthermore, although Candidatus Jettenia and Candidatus Anammoxoglobus were detected from the five and three out of 32 Chinese agricultural fields in the work of Shen and his colleagues (2013), Candidatus Brocadia and Candidatus Kuenenia were predominant groups, occupying 92 % of their detected sequences. The wide distribution of Candidatus Brocadia could be explained by their versatile metabolism system which favors their adaptation to various environments (Gori et al. 2011).
Some sequences affiliating into Candidatus Brocadia showed high identity to Candidatus Brocadia fulgida and Candidatus Brocadia anammoxidans, while more sequences were closely related to the uncultured clones from river and freshwater sediments. Especially, the BLAST analysis against GenBank reveals that 68.7 % of Candidatus Brocadia OTUs detected in this study had a great identity to the clones from Yangtze River marsh sediments (Hou et al. 2013) and freshwater wetlands (Zhu et al. 2011a). Consequently, these results indicated that this linkage of the genus Candidatus Brocadia may be preferable to freshwater ecosystems.
None of our sequences was identified as either Candidatus Scalindua or Scalindua-like in the present study. Similarly, this genus neither detected in the paddy soil received high N input from Zhejiang Province of China where other four genera were discovered (Zhu et al. 2011). Candidatus Scalindua has been reported as a niche-specific group that thrives in the marine ecosystems (Schmid et al. 2007; Humbert et al. 2010; Han and Gu 2013) but is considered as relatively less abundant in terrestrial ecosystems (Humbert et al. 2010). However, it is interesting that another investigation based on 16S rRNA genes with primers Amx368F/Amx820R has found that Candidatus Scalindua is the most dominant group in northeastern Chinese paddy soils (Han and Gu 2013), while we only observed Candidatus Brocadia- or Candidatus Kuenenia-dominated anammox community in three soil profiles (PJ1, PJ2, and SY) from this area. Such inconsistency implies a possible variation of anammox bacteria distribution within relatively small areas and potential bias of the existing primer sets.
3.2 Community structure of anammox bacteria and environmental factors
Except to eight surface samples failing to produce PCR products and four samples predominated by non-anammox bacteria, Candidatus Brocadia and Candidatus Kuenenia were dominant in the rest 28 samples (Fig. 2). PCA based on all retrieved OTUs including non-anammox sequences showed that sampling sites with different planctomycete groups were separated from each other in the first two PCA dimensions (Fig. S1, Electronic Supplementary Material), indicating a site-specific distribution pattern. Candidatus Kuenenia predominated all layer B, C, and D samples from Panjin (PJ1 and PJ2) with a proportion more than 96.2 %, while Candidatus Brocadia exclusively dominated samples from Jingzhou (JZ-B, JZ-C, and JZ-D), Hengyang (HY-B, HY-C, HY-D), and Shenyang (SH-C and SH-D) and take overwhelming proportions in samples from Xiantao (XT-B, XT-C, XT-D), Jiaxing (JX-B, JX-C, JX-D), and Miluo (ML-D) (Fig. 2). Only samples from XN (XN-B, XN-C, and XN-D) and Shangyu (SY-B, SY-C, and SY-D) were inhabited by two genera (Figs. 2 and 3). The result indicated a strong site effect on shaping the community structure of anammox bacteria (Figs. 2 and S1, Electronic Supplementary Material). Although environmental conditions that influence anammox bacteria community have not been well established, spatial variation in their distribution due to local soil types has also been reported in the study of Shen (2013).
CCA based on OTU matrix belonging to anammox sequences showed that x- and y-axes accounted for 32.1 and 25.4 % variance in the relationship between species and environmental factors, respectively (Fig. 3). Monte Carlo test (999 permutation) further showed that the community composition of anammox bacteria significantly correlated with soil pH and NH4 +, accounting for 22.2 and 27.8 % of observed variance, respectively (Fig. 3). CCA based on OTUs and environmental parameters showed that OTU9, OTU13, and OTU28 responded to pH increase more sensitively while OTU2 tended to distribute in high ammonium condition (Fig. S2, Electronic Supplementary Material). Ammonium concentration in agricultural soils is greatly influenced by nitrogen fertilization, and the results thus imply an anthropogenic effect on the distribution of anammox bacteria. A similar result that ammonium significantly influenced the community structure of anammox bacteria has been reported in mangrove sediments, in which the change of ammonium concentration could strongly alter community composition of anammox bacteria (Li and Gu 2013). Previous studies have also revealed that neutral or weakly alkaline environments are favorable to anammox bacteria (Yamamoto et al. 2008; Chen et al. 2009). Furthermore, a recent report has indicated that anammox bacteria are sensitive to the change of pH and their diversity increased in response to both acid and alkaline conditions (Wang and Gu 2014). Coincidently, pH was identified as a significant factor correlated to the community composition of anammox bacteria. These results consistently demonstrated that soil pH is a potential factor influencing the community structure of anammox bacteria’ various ecosystems. As ammonium is one of the essential substrates in anammox process, it is not surprising that pH plays an essential role in shaping anammox bacterial communities, as it generally affects the availability of ammonium.
3.3 Abundance of anammox functional genes
The abundance of anammox bacteria was estimated further by quantifying hzsB genes (Fig. 4). Although anammox bacterial 16S rRNA genes were hardly amplified in the surface paddy soils, hzsB genes could be detected from all the soil layers within the range of 3.78 × 104 to 1.64 × 107 per gram of dry soil. The numbers are comparable to previous investigations on paddy soils based on hzsA and hzsB genes (Humbert et al. 2010; Zhu et al. 2011; Wang et al. 2012a).
Significant difference of hzsB gene abundance could be observed between soil horizons in each sampling site except site HY. Zhu et al. have found that hzsB gene copy numbers were the highest at the depth of 40–50 cm within the same soil type (Zhu et al. 2011), while no similar trend was observed in this study, and the highest gene abundance could be found in any of the soil horizon, implying a heterogeneous distribution of anammox bacteria abundance. The result is similar to the observation in the work of Shen and colleagues (2013) in which they found that abundance of anammox bacteria changed largely among samples from different locations.
Generally, hzsB gene abundance was the lowest in PJ1 and PJ2 from Liaoning, in which organic carbon and nitrate were relatively low and the detected 16S rRNA genes were mostly composed of Candidatus Kuenenia. However, hzsB gene abundance showed no significant correlation with any tested physiochemical parameters (P > 0.05). Similarly, Wang et al. (2012a) found that hzsB gene abundance showed no significant correlation with ammonium, nitrate, and other environmental factors in paddy soils, while Han and Gu (2013) discovered that nitrate concentration in wastewater treatment plants and marine and wetland sediments significantly influenced the abundance of anammox bacteria based on the quantification of 16S rRNA genes, and Shen et al. (2013) considered ammonium content to be the most influential factor in agricultural soils based on quantitative analysis of hzsA genes. All these suggested that different gene markers may produce different conclusions and more research is needed to get a comprehensive understanding on the distribution of anammox bacteria.
Moreover, 16S rRNA genes of anammox bacteria were absent in the most surface soil in this study, while hzsB gene could be detected in all the samples and was abundant in horizon A of sites PJ1, PJ2, ML, and XT. This inconsistency between 16S rRNA gene and hzs genes may be caused by the primer bias. Although the functional genes are generally more efficient in the study of microbial abundance since their direct relations to the physiology of target organisms perform ecological function, the primers designed specifically for hzs genes are still under test and may be amended further. The difference in detection efficiency on anammox bacteria between 16S rRNA genes and hzsA genes has been reported in the work of Hu and colleagues (Hu et al. 2013), in which they found that the hzsA primer pairs recovered a much broader diversity of organisms in an enrichment of anammox bacteria community from paddy soils. Wang and colleagues also found that the copy numbers of anammox 16S rRNA gene were approximately 102-fold lower than those of hzsB genes in estuary sediments (Wang et al. 2012b). The coverage and specificity of the two primer sets need to be compared in future work.
4 Conclusions
Diversity and abundance of anammox bacteria in ten Chinese paddy soil profiles were investigated in the present study. Anammox bacterial 16S rRNA genes were not detected in most of the surface soil profile layers but present in all subsurface and deep horizons. Cloning and sequencing analysis showed that Candidatus Brocadia and Candidatus Kuenenia were the dominating anammox groups in the tested soils and Candidatus Brocadia had a broader distribution. Meanwhile, two genera showed a clear site-specific distribution pattern among different sampling sites and soil pH and ammonium concentration significantly correlated to community structure of anammox bacteria. It is suggested that other essential factors in anammox process such as O2 concentration and soil oxidation-reduction potential could be taken into consideration in future studies.
References
Chen H, Liu S, Yang F, Xue Y, Wang T (2009) The development of simultaneous partial nitrification, ANAMMOX and denitrification (SNAD) process in a single reactor for nitrogen removal. Bioresour Technol 100:1548–1554
Crowe SA, Canfield DE, Mucci A, Sundby B, Maranger R (2012) Anammox, denitrification and fixed-nitrogen removal in sediments from the Lower St. Lawrence Estuary. Biogeosciences 9:4309–4321
DeAngelis KM, Silver WL, Thompson AW, Firestone MK (2010) Microbial communities acclimate to recurring changes in soil redox potential status. Environ Microbiol 12:3137–3149
Dong LF, Smith CJ, Papaspyrou S, Stott A, Osborn AM, Nedwell DB (2009) Changes in benthic denitrification, nitrate ammonification, and anammox process rates and nitrate and nitrite reductase gene abundances along an estuarine nutrient gradient (the Colne estuary, United Kingdom). Appl Environ Microbiol 75:3171–3179
Gori F, Tringe SG, Kartal B, Marchiori E, Jetten MS (2011) The metagenomic basis of anammox metabolism in Candidatus ‘Brocadia fulgida’. Biochem Soc T 39:1799–1804
Han P, Gu JD (2013) More refined diversity of anammox bacteria recovered and distribution in different ecosystems. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 97:3653–3663
Hirsch MD, Long ZT, Song B (2011) Anammox bacterial diversity in various aquatic ecosystems based on the detection of hydrazine oxidase genes (hzoA/hzoB). Microb Ecol 61:264–276
Hou L, Zheng Y, Liu M, Gong J, Zhang X, Yin G, You L (2013) Anaerobic ammonium oxidation (anammox) bacterial diversity, abundance, and activity in marsh sediments of the Yangtze Estuary. J Geophys Res 118:1237–1246
Hu HW, Zhang LM, Dai Y, Di HJ, He JZ (2013) pH-dependent distribution of soil ammonia oxidizers across a large geographical scale as revealed by high-throughput pyrosequencing. J Soils Sediments 13:1439–1449
Humbert S, Tarnawski S, Fromin N, Mallet MP, Aragno M, Zopfi J (2010) Molecular detection of anammox bacteria in terrestrial ecosystems: distribution and diversity. ISME J 4:450–454
Jetten MS, Niftrik L, Strous M, Kartal B, Keltjens JT, Op den Camp HJ (2009) Biochemistry and molecular biology of anammox bacteria. Crit Rev Biochem Mol 44:65–84
Kumar S, Nei M, Dudley J, Tamura K (2008) MEGA: a biologist-centric software for evolutionary analysis of DNA and protein sequences. Brief Bioinforma 9:299–306
Kuypers MM, Lavik G, Woebken D, Schmid M, Fuchs BM, Amann R, Jorgensen BB, Jetten MSM (2005) Massive nitrogen loss from the Benguela upwelling system through anaerobic ammonium oxidation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:6478–6483
Lam P, Lavik G, Jensen MM, van de Vossenberg J, Schmid M, Woebken D, Gutierrez D, Amann R, Jetten MSM, Kuypers MMM (2009) Revising the nitrogen cycle in the Peruvian oxygen minimum zone. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:4752–4757
Li M, Gu JD (2013) Community structure and transcript responses of anammox bacteria, AOA, and AOB in mangrove sediment microcosms amended with ammonium and nitrite. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 97:9859–9874
Long A, Heitman J, Tobias C, Philips R, Song B (2013) Co-occurring anammox, denitrification, and codenitrification in agricultural soils. Appl Environ Microbiol 79:168–176
Mulder A, van der Graaf AA, Robertson LA, Kuenen JG (1995) Anaerobic ammonium oxidation discovered in a denitrifying fluidized bed reactor. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 16:177–184
Risgaard-Petersen N, Meyer RL, Revsbech NP (2005) Denitrification and anaerobic ammonium oxidation in sediments—effects of microphytobenthos and NO3. Aquat Microb Ecol 40:67–76
Rooks C, Schmid MC, Mehsana W, Trimmer M (2012) The depth-specific significance and relative abundance of anaerobic ammonium-oxidizing bacteria in estuarine sediments (Medway Estuary, UK). FEMS Microbiol Ecol 80:19–29
Schloss PD, Handelsman J (2005) Introducing DOTUR, a computer program for defining operational taxonomic units and estimating species richness. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:1501–1506
Schmid M, Twachtmann U, Klein M, Strous M, Juretschko S, Jetten M, Metzger JW, Schleifer KH, Wagner, M (2000) Molecular evidence for genus level diversity of bacteria capable of catalyzing anaerobic ammonium oxidation. Systematic and Applied Microbiology 23:93–106
Schmid MC, Maas B, Dapena A, van de Pas-Schoonen K, van de Vossenberg J, Kartal B, van Niftrik L, Schmidt I, Cirpus I, Kuenen JG, Wagner M, Sinninghe Damste JS, Kuypers M, Revsbech NP, Mendez R, Jetten MS, Strous M (2005) Biomarkers for in situ detection of anaerobic ammonium-oxidizing (anammox) bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:1677–1684
Schmid MC, Risgaard-Petersen N, van de Vossenberg J, Kuypers MM, Lavik G, Petersen J, Hulth S, Thamdrup B, Canfield D, Dalsgaard T, Rysgaard S, Sejr MK, Strous M, den Camp HJ, Jetten MS (2007) Anaerobic ammonium-oxidizing bacteria in marine environments: widespread occurrence but low diversity. Environ Microbiol 9:1476–1484
Schmid M, Schmitz-Esser S, Jetten M, Wagner M (2011) 16S‐23S rDNA intergenic spacer and 23S rDNA of anaerobic ammonium‐oxidizing bacteria: implications for phylogeny and in situ detection. Environ Microbiol 3:450–459
Shen JP, Zhang LM, Zhu YG, Zhang JB, He JZ (2008) Abundance and composition of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and ammonia-oxidizing archaea communities of an alkaline sandy loam. Environ Microbiol 10:1601–1611
Shen LD, Liu S, Lou LP, Liu WP, Xu XY, Zheng P, Hu BL (2013) Broad distribution of diverse anaerobic ammonium-oxidizing bacteria in Chinese agricultural soils. Appl Environ Microbiol 79:6167–6172
Wang Y, Zhu G, Harhangi HR, Zhu B, Jetten MS, Yin C, Op den Camp HJ (2012a) Co-occurrence and distribution of nitrite-dependent anaerobic ammonium and methane-oxidizing bacteria in a paddy soil. FEMS Microbiol Lett 336:79–88
Wang S, Zhu G, Peng Y, Jetten MS, and Yin C (2012b) Anammox bacterial abundance, activity, and contribution in riparian sediments of the Pearl River estuary. Environ Sci Technol 46:8834–8842
Wang J, Gu JD (2013) Dominance of Candidatus Scalindua species in anammox community revealed in soils with different duration of rice paddy cultivation in Northeast China. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 97:1785–1798
Wang TF, Gu JD (2014) Effects of allylthiourea, salinity, and pH on ammonia/ammonium-oxidizing prokaryotes in mangrove sediment incubated in laboratory microcosms. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98:3257–3274
Yamamoto T, Takaki K, Koyama T, Furukawa K (2008) Long-term stability of partial nitritation of swine wastewater digester liquor and its subsequent treatment by Anammox. Bior Tech 99(14):6419–6425
Zhu ZL, Chen DL (2002) Nitrogen fertilizer use in China—contributions to food production, impacts on the environment and best management strategies. Nutr Cycl Agroecosys 63:117–127
Zhu G, Wang S, Feng X, Fan G, Jetten MS, Yin C (2011) Anammox bacterial abundance, biodiversity and activity in a constructed wetland. Environ Sci Technol 45:9951–9958
Acknowledgments
This work was financially supported by the National Science Foundation of China (41090281, 41025004, 41322007). We would like to thank Prof. Wenxue Wei and Ms. Yijun Zhu for their assistance in soil sampling and Drs. Peng Cao and Yu Dai for their help in soil physiochemical analysis.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Yanfen Wang
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
ESM 1
(DOCX 205 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bai, R., Chen, X., He, JZ. et al. Candidatus Brocadia and Candidatus Kuenenia predominated in anammox bacterial community in selected Chinese paddy soils. J Soils Sediments 15, 1977–1986 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-015-1131-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-015-1131-5