Abstract
Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) is essential for SARS-CoV-2 cellular entry. Here we studied the effects of common comorbidities in severe COVID-19 on ACE2 expression. ACE2 levels (by enzyme activity and ELISA measurements) were determined in human serum, heart and lung samples from patients with hypertension (n = 540), heart transplantation (289) and thoracic surgery (n = 49). Healthy individuals (n = 46) represented the controls. Serum ACE2 activity was increased in hypertensive subjects (132%) and substantially elevated in end-stage heart failure patients (689%) and showed a strong negative correlation with the left ventricular ejection fraction. Serum ACE2 activity was higher in male (147%), overweight (122%), obese (126%) and elderly (115%) hypertensive patients. Primary lung cancer resulted in higher circulating ACE2 activity, without affecting ACE2 levels in the surrounding lung tissue. Male sex resulted in elevated serum ACE2 activities in patients with heart transplantation or thoracic surgery (146% and 150%, respectively). Left ventricular (tissular) ACE2 activity was unaffected by sex and was lower in overweight (67%), obese (62%) and older (73%) patients with end-stage heart failure. There was no correlation between serum and tissular (left ventricular or lung) ACE2 activities. Neither serum nor tissue (left ventricle or lung) ACE2 levels were affected by RAS inhibitory medications. Abandoning of ACEi treatment (non-compliance) resulted in elevated blood pressure without effects on circulating ACE2 activities. ACE2 levels associate with the severity of cardiovascular diseases, suggestive for a role of ACE2 in the pathomechanisms of cardiovascular diseases and providing a potential explanation for the higher mortality of COVID-19 among cardiovascular patients. Abandoning RAS inhibitory medication worsens the cardiovascular status without affecting circulating or tissue ACE2 levels.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) resulted in a global health crisis. As of May 7, 2021, there were 156,465,211 cases and 3,264,509 victims of COVID-19 registered worldwide [1]. SARS-CoV-2 is highly virulent, with high mortality rates among hypertensive patients [2,3,4]. The mechanisms by which hypertension promotes increased COVID-19 mortality are complex and likely involve the interaction between hypertension, ageing and underlying cardiovascular comorbidities [5,6,7].
Cellular entry of the SARS-CoV-2 requires the binding of its spike protein to angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) on the cell surface [8]. There are speculations that modulation of this interaction directly (e.g. by blocking the binding) or indirectly (e.g. by trapping the coronavirus by soluble ACE2-like receptors) may provide a treatment option in COVID-19 [8,9,10,11,12]. Evolution of SARS-CoV-2 also targets the ACE2 binding site, as mutations in the ACE2 binding (spike) region of SARS-CoV-2 increased its virulence dramatically, resulting in the third wave of the pandemic [13]. Recent studies demonstrate that seriously ill COVID-19 patients exhibit significant increases in circulating ACE2 activity, suggesting that circulating ACE2 may predict disease severity [14, 15].
ACE2 is a component of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) and its expression is dysregulated in a range of cardiovascular diseases [16]. As ACE2 serves as cellular receptor for SARS-CoV-2, it has been proposed that its upregulation may contribute to the increased COVID-19 mortality in patients with cardiovascular comorbidities. Circulating ACE2 is a useful biomarker of changes in RAAS associated with different pathologies. Yet, changes in circulating ACE2 is patients at-risk for COVID-19 mortality have not been well documented.
A recent scientific discussion, based on indirect evidence from preclinical studies as well as from initial clinical observations, raised the possibility that inhibitors of the renin angiotensin aldosterone system (RAASi) may worsen the outcome of coronavirus infections [2, 3, 17,18,19,20]. This supposition relies largely on results from animal models showing that angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers (ARBs) elevate circulating ACE2 levels [21, 22]. These preclinical results were extrapolated to humans and lead to the postulation for an adverse effect of RAAS inhibitors during SARS-CoV-2 infections [2, 17,18,19]. However, the actual effects of RAASi on circulating ACE2 in humans are not well understood. Due to the lack of definite data, leading medical organisations released public statements supporting continuing medication with RAAS inhibitors and stressed the urgent need for additional clinical data to elucidate the links among cardiovascular diseases, RAASi medications and ACE2 expression as they relate to COVID-19 mortality risk [23,24,25].
The present study was conducted to provide a thorough evaluation of ACE2 levels and expression in human sera and tissue samples (heart and lung) in relation to risk factors for COVID-19 mortality, including cardiovascular diseases (hypertension, heart failure), advanced age, obesity and male sex [26]. We also addressed the effects of cardiovascular disease severity and RAASi medications on ACE2 levels. Nonetheless, we should also highlight that the performed study is a retrospective analysis; therefore, a properly powered prospective study needs to be performed to confirm ACE2 as a selection marker in COVID-19.
Methods
Subjects
Individuals were enrolled at the Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary (healthy, hypertensive and pulmonary disease patients). The study was authorised by the Medical Research Council of Hungary (20753-7/2018/EÜIG). Healthy individuals were without cardiovascular treatments or maladies. Hypertensive patients were enrolled at regular outpatient visits in a consecutive manner. Patients with lung disease were enrolled before chest surgery, representing a mixed cohort of diseases, irrespectively to the patient’s cardiovascular status. Explanted heart (and blood) samples were collected upon heart transplantation at the Semmelweis University Heart and Vascular Center, Budapest, Hungary. The sample collection was authorised by the Medical Research Council of Hungary (ETT TUKEB 7891/2012/EKU (119/PI/12.)). The clinical characteristics of the subjects involved are summarised in Table 1.
Sample collection
Blood samples were collected in BD Vacutainer tubes (SST II Advanced, Ref. No. 367955). Samples were kept at room temperature until coagulation completed (at least 20 min), then serum was separated by centrifugation (1500 g, 15 min) and the supernatant (blood serum) was stored at −80 °C until the measurements. Blood sampling was performed according to the general aseptic technique upon regular visits (hypertensive patients); at the time of medical examination (healthy individuals); immediately before chest surgery (pulmonary diseases) and at a regular visit before heart transplantation. Lung tissue samples were biopsied from resected lung tissue without apparent (macroscopic) signs of tumorous infiltration. Lung tissue samples were collected from patients with adenocarcinoma (n = 24), squamous cell carcinoma (n = 9), metastatic tumours in the lung (n = 7), emphysema (n = 3), pneumonia (n = 2), sarcoidosis (n = 1), pneumothorax (n = 1), fibroelastosis (n = 1) and silicoanthrocosis (n = 1). Lung tissue samples were placed in a physiological buffer solution in the operating theatre and transferred to the laboratory. Here biopsies were made and the samples were frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −70 °C. Well-characterised pseudonymised blood serum and human myocardial tissue samples were obtained from the Transplantation Biobank of the Heart and Vascular Center at Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary [27]. Blood samples were collected immediately before heart transplantation. Myocardial tissue samples were biopsied by a transmural cut from the anterior wall of the left ventricle of explanted hearts during heart transplantation, immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C.
Biochemical methods
ACE2 activity measurements from the sera
Measurements were performed as described earlier [28, 29]. The ACE2-specific fluorescent substrate (Mca-APK-DNP) was custom synthesised by Peptide2.com (purity >95%). Measured fluorescence intensities were calibrated using 7-Methoxycoumarin (Mca, Sigma, Cat. No. 235199) standard solutions. The fluorescent intensities (in arbitrary units, AU) were plotted as the function of the reaction time. The slope of the linear fit on the plotted data yielded the measure of the activity (in AU/min) and accepted only if the goodness of the fit (r2) was higher than 0.9. The actual amount of the converted substrate was calculated based on the calibration of the instrument with the known concentration (amount) of the fully cleaved substrate. In some cases, the nonspecific activity was also determined. Nonspecific activity (activity in the presence of 1.25 μM MLN-4760) was 6.3 ± 0.8% (mean ± SEM) of the activity in the absence of the ACE2 inhibitor in a set of 152 serum samples. This nonspecific activity was considered to be negligible (thus uncorrected activities are shown here). The unit (U) of activity is defined as micromoles/min. Note, MLN-4760 was applied at a supra-maximal concentration, since it inhibited the ACE2 activity in the low nanomolar range (IC50 values) in various models in our laboratory.
ACE2 activity and expression measurements from lung and heart tissue samples
Tissue samples were broken to small pieces (ranging 9–89 mg in weight) in a mortar with a pestle under liquid air. Three (frozen) pieces were selected from each disrupted tissue sample to yield triplicates in case of the lung, while single tissue pieces were used in the case of heart samples. Frozen tissue pieces were placed in a glass tissue grinder (homogeniser) and 10-μl/mg (or a minimum of 200 μl) homogenisation buffer (assay buffer supplemented with 0.6% Triton-X-100, kept on ice) was added. Tissue was completely homogenised by a rotating PTFE pestle on ice.
Tissue homogenates were centrifuged (16,000 g for 10 min at 4 °C) and supernatants were collected and kept on ice while protein concentration measurements by the BCA method. Aliquots from the samples were diluted to 0.5 mg/ml (lung) or 1 mg/ml(heart) and the protein content of the diluted samples was determined in parallel with the activity and concentration measurements.
ACE2 activities in the tissue homogenates were measured as described for the serum activity measurements. The differences are that 10-μl tissue extract was pipetted into the wells of the black microtiter plates, which was diluted by 90-μl homogenisation buffer. Then the assay was performed exactly as described for the serum ACE2 activity measurements (adding the same salt-substrate regent and performing the measurement in 200-μl final volume).
Note, the nonspecific activity was significantly higher in the tissue extracts than in serum samples, reaching 66 ± 2% and 11 ± 0.5% (lung and heart, respectively, mean ± SEM). Accordingly, the specific activities are shown in the case of tissue samples:
Specific activity = activity without ACE2 inhibitor – activity in the presence of ACE2 inhibitor
The unit (U) of activity is defined as micromoles/min.
Lung and heart tissue ACE2 expression was also determined by ELISA (Cat# DY933-05, R&D Systems, McKinley Place, MN, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The ACE2 concentration was measured in parallel with the activity measurements at 16-fold final dilutions of the original tissue supernatants. Tissue supernatants were kept on ice until the ELISA determinations and were processed on the same day as their preparation. The values were estimated using a standard set provided with the kit on each microtiter plate, and the values were normalised to the measured protein concentrations.
Measurement of the biochemical efficacy of the ACE inhibitory treatment
Measurements were performed as described earlier [30,31,32] with modifications. Two aliquots were taken from the same serum sample. One aliquot was diluted twofold, while the other was diluted by 200-fold in ACE assay buffer. One hundred microliters of these differently diluted samples was added into the wells of a 96-well plate. The plate was warmed to 37 °C and then the pre-warmed substrate solution (100 μl, 1 mM N-[3-(2-furyl)acryloyl]-L-phenylalanylglycylglycine) was added to start the reaction. The level of inhibition was calculated according to the equation.
For additional details on the calculation and the theoretical background, please refer to [32].
Chemicals
All chemicals were from Sigma if not stated otherwise.
Ethical approval
All studies were approved by the Regional and Institutional Ethics Committee, University of Debrecen (UD REC/IEC number: 3261-2010 for hypertensive patients and UDCC REC/IEC number: 4375-2015 for tissue samples) and by the Medical Research Council of Hungary. The pseudonymised blood serum and human myocardial tissue samples were obtained from the Transplantation Biobank of the Heart and Vascular Center at Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary. Following institutional and national ethical committee approval (ethical permission numbers: ETT TUKEB 7891/2012/EKU (119/PI/12.) and informed consent from patients. Pseudonymised clinical data were obtained from the database of the Transplantation Biobank. The research was in accordance with the tenets of the Helsinki Declaration.
Statistical analysis
Nonparametric tests were applied. Mann-Whitney test was used when two groups were compared. Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test was performed for multiple groups. Correlations were evaluated by the Spearman’s rank correlation test or by linear fit. Statistical analysis was made by Prism for Mac OS X (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). Differences between the compared groups were considered to be significant when P value was lower than 0.05 (Mann-Whitney test) or the mean rank differences reached significance as indicated by the statistical software.
Results
ACE2 activity correlates with the stage of cardiovascular disease and being modulated by comorbidities
Circulating ACE2 activity correlated with the severity of cardiovascular disease. It was slightly elevated in hypertension (32% increase) and dramatically increased at the occurrence of heart failure (an additional 434% increase, Fig. 1A). Moreover, circulating ACE2 activity strongly correlated with the left ventricular ejection fraction (EF, Spearman’s rho = −0.7576, P < 0.05, n = 750, Fig. 1B), suggesting an almost linear correlation (parameters of the best linear fit on the values: r2 = 0.4805, P < 0.05, n = 750, Fig. 1B). Note, these data included all patients from the groups without selection by their medications (Table 2).
It was observed that the increase in circulating ACE2 activity is affected by cardiovascular comorbidities. Circulating ACE2 activity was higher in males than in females, and was elevated in overweight and obese patients; moreover, circulating ACE2 activity was also increased in elderly hypertensive individuals (Fig. 1C, Table 3).
A different effect of comorbidities was seen in end-stage heart failure patients. Among these patients, only the male sex resulted in significant differences in the circulating ACE2 activity (Fig. 1D, Table 3). In contrast, there was no effect of sex on the left ventricular ACE2 activity (Fig. 1F, Table 3) and expression (Fig. 1H, Table 3). However, both ACE2 activity and expression were lower in obese heart failure patients (Fig. 1F and H, Table 3). Similarly, ageing resulted in lower left ventricular ACE2 activity (Fig. 1F, Table 3).
Only male sex resulted in significant effects on the circulating ACE2 activities in the patient group with pulmonary disease (Fig. 1E, Table 3). There were no additional statistically significant differences in the circulating and tissue ACE2 levels (Fig. 1G and 1I, Table 3) in this group.
Left ventricular ACE2 activity and expression correlate with circulating ACE2 activity
Both left ventricular ACE2 activity (Fig. 2A) and expression (Fig. 2B) positively correlated with the serum ACE2 activities of the same patients. Besides to these correlations, a linear relationship was verified between left ventricular ACE2 activity and expression (Fig. 2C), confirming that the two techniques are accurately measuring tissular ACE2 levels. Of note, there were no effects of RAAS inhibitory drug treatments on circulating ACE2 activities (Fig. 2D, Table 2), left ventricular ACE2 activity (Fig. 2E, Table 2) or left ventricular ACE2 expression (Fig. 1F, Table 2) in end-stage heart failure patients.
Lung tissue ACE2 activity and expression did not correlate with circulating ACE2 activity
Neither lung tissue ACE2 activity (Fig. 3A) nor lung tissue ACE2 expression (Fig. 3B) correlated with circulating ACE2 activities in the same patients with pulmonary disease. In contrast, a linear correlation was established between lung tissular ACE2 activity and expression (Fig. 3C). Similar to heart failure patients, RAAS inhibitory medication was without statistically significant effects on serum ACE2 activity (Fig. 3D, Table 2), lung tissular ACE2 activity (Fig. 3E, Table 2) and ACE2 expression (Fig. 3F, Table 2) in patients with lung disease.
Circulating ACE2 was elevated in patients with primary lung cancer
Circulating ACE2 activity was elevated in patients with primary lung cancer (adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma) when compared to patients with metastasis or non-cancerous diseases (sarcoidosis, silicoanthracosis, pneumothorax, pneumonia, emphysema, Fig. 4A). In contrast, there was no difference in tissue ACE2 activity (Fig. 4B) or tissue ACE2 expression (Fig. 4C) in dissected, macroscopically healthy lung tissue samples.
RAAS inhibitory medication is without effects on the circulating ACE2 activity in hypertensive patients
Serum ACE2 activities in hypertensive patients with ACEi drugs or with ARBs were higher, while ACE2 activities in hypertensive patients without RAAS inhibition overlapped with healthy controls (Fig. 5 and Table 2). Patients on different ACEi drugs (enalapril, perindopril and ramipril) had similar serum ACE2 activities (enalapril: 22 ± 14, n = 59; perindopril: 23 ± 15, n = 167; ramipril: 21 ± 15 mU/L, n = 113, Fig. 5). Furthermore, serum ACE2 activities were similar in patients treated for more (23 ± 16 mU/L, n = 223) or less than 12 months (22 ± 14 mU/L, n = 52) by ACEi drugs (Fig. 5).
Insufficient compliance results in higher blood pressure, but does not affect circulating ACE2 activity in ACEi-treated hypertensive patients
Both systolic and diastolic blood pressure negatively correlated with the level of ACE inhibition in hypertensive patients on ACEi medication. The maximal anti-hypertensive effect of ACEi treatment on systolic (Fig. 6A) and diastolic (Fig. 6B) blood pressure was reached at 94 and 96% of ACE inhibition, respectively. In contrast, the level of ACE inhibition was without effects on serum ACE2 activity (Fig. 6C, Table 2).
Discussion
The major findings of the present study are that expression of ACE2, the receptor for SARS-CoV [8, 33, 11], is modulated by a range of cardiovascular risk factors and pathologies, including hypertension, old age, comorbid obesity and heart failure.
We utilised a combination of reliable methods to assess circulating ACE2 as a potential predictive biomarker that could be used to stratify patients at risk for increased COVID-19 mortality. It is a strength of the current investigation that we (1) provided the measured ACE2 parameters in SI units; (2) confirmed tissular ACE2 activity by ELISA and (3) showed that ACE2 levels and activity values linearly correlate. Moreover, the evaluation presented here makes it possible to directly compare hypertensive and end-stage heart failure patients with healthy individuals to shed light on the potential role for ACE2 in cardiovascular disease. It is important to note that some other studies [34, 35] used to estimate circulating ACE2 levels based on a multiplexed qPCR-based technique [36], which does not yield real concentration values.
The first mentioning of ACE2 as a potential contributor to hypertension came from animal models. It was suggested that the ACE2 locus was located in a quantitative trait locus for blood pressure and it was confirmed that ACE2 levels are higher in spontaneously hypertensive rats [37]. Moreover, ACE2 deletion results in (albeit strain dependent) blood pressure elevation [38]. The above links have been subsequently extended to humans by our previous observations and thus implicating a role for ACE2 dysregulation in essential hypertension [28]. Here we put ACE2 in the context of cardiovascular disease continuum. Accordingly, the elevation in circulating ACE2 levels is relatively small in hypertension, especially when compared to end-stage heart failure patients. Serum ACE2 levels in end-stage heart failure patients were about fourfold higher than those in hypertensive subjects and about twofold higher than those in heart failure patients of low NYHA classes [28, 29]. Our previous studies revealed an inverse relationship between serum ACE2 activity and left ventricular ejection fraction in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and in patients with hypertension [28, 29, 39]. This proposed negative correlation between circulating ACE2 activity and left ventricular ejection function has been confirmed here, in a large cardiovascular patient population ranging from mild hypertensives to end-stage heart failure patients. The observed correlation appears to be strong (as defined by the high correlation coefficient rho value) and also linear, as represented by the linear distribution of the values. On the other hand, our results are in clear contrast to those obtained in experimental studies in laboratory rodents [21, 22], whereby we found no effects of RAASi medications on ACE2 activities or expressions in sera, left ventricular or lung tissues in humans.
Here we found about 50% higher circulating ACE2 activities in hypertensive patients with RAAS inhibitory medications (ACEi and ARB) than those in healthy individuals. This finding is of importance, as previous studies suggested that RAASi medication may contribute to COVID-19 mortality [2, 17,18,19], a hypothesis based on (1) the relatively high incidence of hypertension among SARS-CoV-2-infected patients [2]; (2) the findings of preclinical investigation showing that some RAASi medications result in increases in circulating ACE2 levels in animal models [21, 22]; and (3) the observation that ACE2 is critical for the binding and entry of SARS-CoV-2 to the cells [8, 9]. In the present study, we investigated the effects of RAASi medications on ACE2. A novel method was employed to determine the efficacy levels of ACE inhibitory drugs [32], thus allowing testing the hypothetical relationship between circulating ACE2 activities and the efficacies of ACEi medications. This analysis confirmed that patients with insufficient compliance had higher blood pressure values. More importantly, however, the level of ACE inhibition was without influence on ACE2 activities in the circulation. Accordingly, discontinuation of ACEi medication should not substantially affect serum ACE2 levels.
Circulating ACE2 activities were generally higher in males than in females, confirming previous reports [35, 34]. Moreover, the fact that this effect of gender is present in all patient populations (hypertensive, end-stage heart failure and pulmonary disease) points towards a common, disease independent expression/secretion mechanism. We also investigated tissular ACE2 expression patterns. Surprisingly, in contrast to the uniformly higher circulating ACE2 levels in males, left ventricular and lung tissue ACE2 levels showed no sex differences. The biological mechanisms underlying these observations are presently unclear. Additional differences were also noted between hypertensive and end-stage heart failure patients. Higher body mass index was paralleled by increased serum ACE2 activities only in hypertensive patients. We also found an age-dependent increase in serum ACE2 activity in hypertensive patients, extending recent findings [34].
On the basis of our findings, the contribution of different organs to the circulating ACE2 pool can be deduced. We propose that circulating ACE2 activity is a good biomarker of cardiac ACE2 expression [40], whereas its link to ACE2 expression in the lung is limited. Previous preclinical findings support this concept [41]. As the heart can be directly infected by SARS-CoV-2, circulating ACE2 could be used as a biomarker to identify patients at risk for cardiac injury associated with COVID-19.
The apparent disconnect between lung and circulating ACE2 levels can be explained by the high ACE2 expression level in the heart (being about fourfold higher than that in the lung, see Table 2)and/or by a more efficient ACE2 shedding from the heart than from the lung. ADAM17 was proposed as an ACE2 sheddase [42], which was found to be regulated to contribute presynaptic neuron activity [43] and upregulated in diabetes [44]. These findings suggest that ACE2 shedding to the circulation is not only depend on its expression, but also on ADAM17 expression and activity in the tissues. This may explain why the richly endothelised lung contributes less to the circulating ACE2 pool, then the heart.
Furthermore, we found that circulating ACE2 levels were elevated in patients with primary lung tumours. This elevation of circulating ACE2 activity cannot be explained by higher ACE2 expression in lung regions without (macroscopic) tumorous infiltration, since tissue ACE2 activities were not affected in the surrounding regions. This is important information in light that elevated circulating ACE2 levels were linked to elevated lung ACE2 expression [45]. Our data support increased ACE2 expression and secretion directly from the tumorous tissue in accordance with Zhang et al. [45], or some compensatory ACE2 secretion from non-cancerous tissues in these patients. A prime candidate of that can be the heart, having elevated right ventricular (and left atrial) blood pressure as a result of elevated pulmonary blood pressure. Clarifying this issue requires additional studies.
It is also possible that organs other than the heart also contribute to circulating ACE2 levels. For example, a recent study showed that ACE2 is highly expressed in the gastrointestinal tract and in the kidney [46]. In that regard, it is interesting that ~70% of patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 have gastrointestinal symptoms [47, 48] and a significant percentage develops acute kidney disease [49, 50]. These facts rise the possibility that the elevated circulating ACE2 levels not only reflects to ACE2 dysregulation in the heart, but may also indicate dysregulation in the kidneys. In particular, kidney failure is a common comorbidity of heart failure, and acute kidney failure may significantly contribute to the mortality in COVID-19 [49, 50]. While increased tissue ACE2 levels likely facilitates infection of cells with SARS-CoV-2, the effect of elevated circulating levels of ACE2 per se on the pathogenesis of COVID-19 is less understood [51].
There are certain limitations of the present work. A prime limitation is that it represents a retrospective analysis of our previous clinical studies and collected tissue samples. The samples have been drawn from the ethnically homogeneous (Caucasian) population of Hungary and therefore our study design precluded the analysis of the effects of race. Another limitation is that biospecimens derived from SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals were unavailable to test the predictive effects of the parameters assessed. Our experiments were not designed nor powered sufficiently to the question of the risk-benefit of RAAS inhibitors in COVID-19. Finally, the sources of the lung tissues were from various baseline diseases (cancer, sarcoidosis and pneumothorax were the most frequent diagnoses in the related experimental group).
In spite of these limitations, our study suggests that ACE2 dysregulation associates with the severity of cardiovascular disease, which can be a pathological step in the worsening of the patient’s cardiovascular condition. This pathological pathway may be particularly important in COVID-19, since ACE2 dysregulation may explain the higher mortality among elderly and overweight cardiovascular patients, implicating circulating ACE2 as a biomarker of COVID-19 mortality.
References
Coronavirus Resource Center, Johns Hopkins University. https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html. Accessed 7 May 202.
Fang L, Karakiulakis G, Roth M. Are patients with hypertension and diabetes mellitus at increased risk for COVID-19 infection? Lancet Respir Med. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2213-2600(20)30116-8.
Yang X, Yu Y, Xu J, Shu H, Xia J, Liu H, et al. Clinical course and outcomes of critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a single-centered, retrospective, observational study. Lancet Respir Med. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2213-2600(20)30079-5.
Zhang JJ, Dong X, Cao YY, Yuan YD, Yang YB, Yan YQ, et al. Clinical characteristics of 140 patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 in Wuhan, China. Allergy. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.14238.
Clark CE, McDonagh STJ, McManus RJ, Martin U. COVID-19 and hypertension: risks and management. A scientific statement on behalf of the British and Irish hypertension society. J Hum Hypertens. 2021;35(4):304–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41371-020-00451-x.
Guo T, Fan Y, Chen M, Wu X, Zhang L, He T, et al. Cardiovascular implications of fatal outcomes of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). JAMA Cardiol. 2020;5(7):811–8. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2020.1017.
Linschoten, Asselbergs FW. CAPACITY-COVID: a European registry to determine the role of cardiovascular disease in the COVID-19 pandemic. Eur Heart J. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa280.
Hoffmann M, Kleine-Weber H, Schroeder S, Kruger N, Herrler T, Erichsen S, et al. SARS-CoV-2 cell entry depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and is blocked by a clinically proven protease inhibitor. Cell. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.052.
Walls AC, Park YJ, Tortorici MA, Wall A, McGuire AT, Veesler D. Structure, function, and antigenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein. Cell. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.058.
Jia H. Pulmonary angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) and inflammatory lung disease. Shock. 2016;46(3):239–48. https://doi.org/10.1097/shk.0000000000000633.
Zhang H, Penninger JM, Li Y, Zhong N, Slutsky AS. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) as a SARS-CoV-2 receptor: molecular mechanisms and potential therapeutic target. Intensive Care Med. 2020;46(4):586–90.
Gurwitz D. Angiotensin receptor blockers as tentative SARS-CoV-2 therapeutics. Drug Dev Res. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1002/ddr.21656.
Rapid increase of a SARS-CoV-2 variant with multiple spike protein mutations observed in the United Kingdom. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Stockholm. 2020. https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/SARS-CoV-2-variant-multiple-spike-protein-mutations-United-Kingdom.pdf. Accessed 20 Dec 2020.
Nagy B, Fejes Z, Szentkereszty Z, Sütő R, Várkonyi I, Ajzner É, et al. A dramatic rise in serum ACE2 activity in a critically ill COVID-19 patient. Int J Infect Dis. 2021;103:412–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2020.11.184.
Reindl-Schwaighofer R, Hodlmoser S, Eskandary F, Poglitsch M, Bonderman D, Strassl R, et al. ACE2 elevation in severe COVID-19. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021;203(9):1191–6. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202101-0142LE.
Atlas SA. The renin-angiotensin aldosterone system: pathophysiological role and pharmacologic inhibition. J Manag Care Pharm. 2007;13(8 Suppl B):9–20. https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2007.13.s8-b.9.
Esler M, Esler D. Can angiotensin receptor-blocking drugs perhaps be harmful in the COVID-19 pandemic? J Hypertens. 2020;Publish Ahead of Print. https://doi.org/10.1097/hjh.0000000000002450.
Zheng YY, Ma YT, Zhang JY, Xie X. COVID-19 and the cardiovascular system. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41569-020-0360-5.
Vaduganathan M, Vardeny O, Michel T, McMurray JJV, Pfeffer MA, Solomon SD. Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors in patients with Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsr2005760.
Kuster GM, Pfister O, Burkard T, Zhou Q, Twerenbold R, Haaf P, et al. SARS-CoV2: should inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system be withdrawn in patients with COVID-19? Eur Heart J. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa235.
Ferrario CM, Jessup J, Chappell MC, Averill DB, Brosnihan KB, Tallant EA, et al. Effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and angiotensin II receptor blockers on cardiac angiotensin-converting enzyme 2. Circulation. 2005;111(20):2605–10. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.104.510461.
Ishiyama Y, Gallagher PE, Averill DB, Tallant EA, Brosnihan KB, Ferrario CM. Upregulation of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 after myocardial infarction by blockade of angiotensin II receptors. Hypertension. 2004;43(5):970–6. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.HYP.0000124667.34652.1a.
Position statement of the ESC Council on Hypertension on ACE-inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers. European Society of Cardiology. 2020. https://www.escardio.org/Councils/Council-on-Hypertension-(CHT)/News/position-statement-of-the-esc-council-on-hypertension-on-ace-inhibitors-and-ang. Accessed 19 Mar 2020.
Patients taking ACE-i and ARBs who contract COVID-19 should continue treatment, unless otherwise advised by their physician. American Heart Association. 2020. https://newsroom.heart.org/news/patients-taking-ace-i-and-arbs-who-contract-covid-19-should-continue-treatment-unless-otherwise-advised-by-their-physician. Accessed 19 Mar 2020.
Kreutz R, Algharably EAE, Azizi M, Dobrowolski P, Guzik T, Januszewicz A, et al. Hypertension, the renin-angiotensin system, and the risk of lower respiratory tract infections and lung injury: implications for COVID-19. Cardiovasc Res. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvaa097.
Yanez ND, Weiss NS, Romand JA, Treggiari MM. COVID-19 mortality risk for older men and women. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):1742. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09826-8.
Sayour AA, Oláh A, Ruppert M, Barta BA, Horváth EM, Benke K, et al. Characterization of left ventricular myocardial sodium-glucose cotransporter 1 expression in patients with end-stage heart failure. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2020;19(1):159. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-020-01141-1.
Uri K, Fagyas M, Kertesz A, Borbely A, Jenei C, Bene O, et al. Circulating ACE2 activity correlates with cardiovascular disease development. J Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone Syst. 2016;17(4):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470320316668435.
Uri K, Fagyas M, Manyine Siket I, Kertesz A, Csanadi Z, Sandorfi G, et al. New perspectives in the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) IV: circulating ACE2 as a biomarker of systolic dysfunction in human hypertension and heart failure. PLoS One. 2014;9(4):e87845. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0087845.
Fagyas M, Uri K, Siket IM, Darago A, Boczan J, Banyai E, et al. New perspectives in the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) I: endogenous angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition. PLoS One. 2014;9(4):e87843.
Fagyas M, Uri K, Siket IM, Fulop GA, Csato V, Darago A, et al. New perspectives in the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) II: albumin suppresses angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) activity in human. PLoS One. 2014;9(4):e87844.
Tóth A, Fagyas M, Papp Z, Édes I. inventors; University of Debrecen, assignee. Hungary: Dilution based inhibition assay; 2012.
Luan J, Jin X, Lu Y, Zhang L. SARS-CoV-2 spike protein favors ACE2 from Bovidae and Cricetidae. J Med Virol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.25817.
Wallentin L, Lindbäck J, Eriksson N, Hijazi Z, Eikelboom JW, Ezekowitz MD, et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) levels in relation to risk factors for COVID-19 in two large cohorts of patients with atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa697.
Sama IE, Ravera A, Santema BT, van Goor H, Ter Maaten JM, Cleland JGF, et al. Circulating plasma concentrations of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 in men and women with heart failure and effects of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone inhibitors. Eur Heart J. 2020;41(19):1810–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa373.
Assarsson E, Lundberg M, Holmquist G, Björkesten J, Thorsen SB, Ekman D, et al. Homogenous 96-plex PEA immunoassay exhibiting high sensitivity, specificity, and excellent scalability. PLoS One. 2014;9(4):e95192. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095192.
Crackower MA, Sarao R, Oudit GY, Yagil C, Kozieradzki I, Scanga SE, et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 is an essential regulator of heart function. Nature. 2002;417(6891):822–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature00786.
Gurley SB, Allred A, Le TH, Griffiths R, Mao L, Philip N, et al. Altered blood pressure responses and normal cardiac phenotype in ACE2-null mice. J Clin Invest. 2006;116(8):2218–25. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI16980.
Fagyas M, Kertész A, Siket IM, Bánhegyi V, Kracskó B, Szegedi A, et al. Level of the SARS-CoV-2 receptor ACE2 activity is highly elevated in old-aged patients with aortic stenosis: implications for ACE2 as a biomarker for the severity of COVID-19. GeroScience. 2021;43(1):19–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-020-00300-2.
Nicin L, Abplanalp WT, Mellentin H, Kattih B, Tombor L, John D, et al. Cell type-specific expression of the putative SARS-CoV-2 receptor ACE2 in human hearts. Eur Heart J. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa311.
Kovács Á, Fülöp GÁ, Kovács A, Csípő T, Bódi B, Priksz D, et al. Renin overexpression leads to increased titin-based stiffness contributing to diastolic dysfunction in hypertensive mRen2 rats. Am J Phys Heart Circ Phys. 2016;310(11):H1671–H82. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00842.2015.
Jia HP, Look DC, Tan P, Shi L, Hickey M, Gakhar L, et al. Ectodomain shedding of angiotensin converting enzyme 2 in human airway epithelia. Am J Phys Lung Cell Mol Phys. 2009;297(1):L84–96. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajplung.00071.2009.
Mukerjee S, Gao H, Xu J, Sato R, Zsombok A, Lazartigues E. ACE2 and ADAM17 interaction regulates the activity of Presympathetic neurons. Hypertension. 2019;74(5):1181–91. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.13133.
Chodavarapu H, Pedersen K, Lazartigues E. The ACE2 sheddase, ADAM17, is up-regulated in diabetic db/db mice. FASEB J. 2015;29(S1):997.1. https://doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.29.1_supplement.997.1.
Zhang L, Han X, Shi Y. Comparative analysis of SARS-CoV-2 receptor ACE2 expression in multiple solid tumors and matched non-diseased tissues. Infect Genet Evol : J Mol Epidemiol Evol Gen Infect Dis. 2020;85:104428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2020.104428.
Chen Y, Guo Y, Pan Y, Zhao ZJ. Structure analysis of the receptor binding of 2019-nCoV. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.02.071.
Hui DSC, Zumla A. Severe acute respiratory syndrome: historical, epidemiologic, and clinical features. Infect Dis Clin N Am. 2019;33(4):869–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idc.2019.07.001.
Holshue ML, DeBolt C, Lindquist S, Lofy KH, Wiesman J, Bruce H, et al. First case of 2019 novel coronavirus in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(10):929–36. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2001191.
Gagliardi I, Patella G, Michael A, Serra R, Provenzano M, Andreucci M. COVID-19 and the kidney: from epidemiology to clinical practice. J Clin Med. 2020;9(8):2506. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082506.
Ng JH, Bijol V, Sparks MA, Sise ME, Izzedine H, Jhaveri KD. Pathophysiology and pathology of acute kidney injury in patients with COVID-19. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2020;27(5):365–76. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ackd.2020.09.003.
Tai W, He L, Zhang X, Pu J, Voronin D, Jiang S, et al. Characterization of the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of 2019 novel coronavirus: implication for development of RBD protein as a viral attachment inhibitor and vaccine. Cell Mol Immunol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41423-020-0400-4.
Funding
Open access funding provided by University of Debrecen. The work is supported by the GINOP-2.3.2-15-2016-00043 (to ZCs, IÉ, ZP and AT), GINOP-2.3.2-15-2016-00050 (to AT) projects. These projects are co-financed by the European Union and the European Regional Development Fund (GINOP). Projects FK 128809 (to MF), K134939 (to T.R.), K 116940 and K 132623 (to AT) have been implemented with the support provided from the National Research, Development and Innovation Fund of Hungary. Project no. NVKP_16-1–2016-0017 (‘National Heart Program’) has been implemented with the support provided from the National Research, Development and Innovation Fund of Hungary, financed under the NVKP_16 funding scheme. The research was financed by the Thematic Excellence Programme (2020-4.1.1.-TKP2020) of the Ministry for Innovation and Technology in Hungary, within the framework of the Therapeutic Development and Bioimaging thematic programmes of the Semmelweis University. Project no. TKP2020-NKA-04 and TKP2020-IKA-04 has been implemented with the support provided from the National Research, Development and Innovation Fund of Hungary, financed under the 2020-4.1.1-TKP2020 funding scheme.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Dr. Tóth, Fagyas, Édes and Papp have a patent EP2664920A1 issued.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
This article is published under an open access license. Please check the 'Copyright Information' section either on this page or in the PDF for details of this license and what re-use is permitted. If your intended use exceeds what is permitted by the license or if you are unable to locate the licence and re-use information, please contact the Rights and Permissions team.
About this article
Cite this article
Fagyas, M., Bánhegyi, V., Úri, K. et al. Changes in the SARS-CoV-2 cellular receptor ACE2 levels in cardiovascular patients: a potential biomarker for the stratification of COVID-19 patients. GeroScience 43, 2289–2304 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-021-00467-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-021-00467-2