Abstract
Algae are photosynthetic prokaryotic or eukaryotic ubiquitously found group of organisms. Their enormous potentiality in coping up with various environmental crises has been well documented. Algae have proven to be ideal for biomonitoring of water pollution and help in removing the pollutants with their process of bioremediation apart from the production of eco-friendly sources of energy. Industries like food and pharmaceuticals are exploiting algae for producing several value-added products. The agricultural sector is also highly benefited from microalgae, as they are the good promoters of crop growth. The CO2-removing potential of algae proves to be an asset in fighting climate change. Moreover, the relatively easy and inexpensive methods of sampling and culturing of algae make them more popular. In this paper, we review the sustainable application aspects of algae in various areas like pollution control, energy production, agriculture, and fighting climate change. Critical discussions have been made on the recent trends and advances of algal technologies indicating future prospects.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Algae are thallophytic in nature; the body is not organized into true stems, leaves, and roots. Algae may be solitary or live in colonies. Their primitive vegetative bodies lack the vascular system which makes them dependant on water all the time (Likens 2009). They are ubiquitously found in a wide range of habitats, from soil to water. No extremities bound them and can be found in cold to warm, alkaline to acidic conditions (Likens 2009). Most of the algae possess chlorophyll-a, which makes them the primary producers and principal basis of food webs on earth (Likens 2009).
For decades Spirulina sp. and Aphanizomenon sp. are consumed as a food source by humans (Spolaore et al. 2006). Even having such historical background of the use of microalgae by humans, the applications of microalgae is still new and unexplored (Spolaore et al. 2006; Milledge 2011). Algae are being investigated for their beneficial aspects to both humans and the environment. They have been recognized as a very good bioindicator of water pollution (Briggs 1985). In addition, to monitor water pollution and predict future consequences, algae can also perform bioremediation to remove the pollutants from water bodies (Edwards et al. 2013; Dixit and Singh 2015). Algae are also being used in the field of sustainable energy. For instance, biofuels like biodiesel, biomethane, and bioethanol have been successfully produced from algae (Chisti 2007; Rahman et al. 2017). Anaerobic digestion has been implicated with algae in microbial fuel cells to produce electricity (Rashid et al. 2013; Gajda et al. 2015; Fasahati et al. 2017). Algal biomass also possesses various bioactive compounds which can help to facilitate the production of value-added products for food and pharmaceutical industries (González Del Campo et al. 2013).
The contribution of algae in agriculture is untold as they are the biological promoters of crop growth. Specifically, microalgae promote the growth of beneficial bacteria, improve soil organic carbon contents, make atmospheric nitrogen available to the soil, produce growth hormones, and prevent plant diseases (Fogg 1949; Karthikeyan et al. 2007; Swain et al. 2017). The photosynthetic rates of algae are ideal for trapping CO2, thereby removing the excess CO2 from the atmosphere. Mass cultivation of algae has been proving beneficial in controlling climate change (Haoyang 2018; Toochi 2018; Adeniyi et al. 2018; Anguselvi et al. 2019). To date, a few numbers of review articles are available focusing algal driven solutions to individual environmental issues like pollution, energy demand, climate change, etc. (Gouveia and Oliveira 2009; Haoyang 2018; Rajakumari and Ridhanya 2021). However, no comprehensive and exclusive review is available. Hence, this review article put a beam on the research advancements on algal technology with regard to environmental sustainability. Different applications of algae for environmental sustainability are illustrated in Fig. 1.
Algae in environment sustainability
The unique relationship of algae with their aquatic habitat makes them one of the best bioindicators of water pollution. Besides, to report and predict the consequences of pollution, algae also help in dealing with the pollution by their process of bioremediation. For a sustainable source of energy, oil and algal biomass is being utilized in producing carbon–neutral biofuels. In addition, algal biomass is a rich source of value-added products that encourages us to minimize our dependence on synthetic and nonbiodegradable compounds that ultimately benefits the environment.
Algae as a bioindicator for biomonitoring
Biological indicators or bioindicators are those organisms whose presence reflects the environmental conditions (Laitat 1994). According to Karr and Chu (1999), we are dependent on the prediction and identification of anthropogenic activities in the biological systems to protect biological resources. Therefore, the data collected from indicator organisms can be utilized to evaluate certain degrees of environmental impacts and their possible threat to other living organisms. Biomonitoring becomes an essential application of biological feedback for the assessment of environmental change. For a sustainable approach in environmental monitoring, it has become essential to reduce the use of chemical indicators and to adopt and increase the use of bioindicators (McCormick and Cairns 1994).
In an aquatic ecosystem, algae are one of the most important groups and are proven to be an essential component of biological monitoring programs. They are well suited for the assessment of water quality because of their nutrient needs and very short life cycles. The rapid reproduction makes them ideal indicators of short-term environmental impacts. Algae are directly affected by physical and chemical factors because they are the primary producers of aquatic ecosystems. The benefits of using algae as a bioindicator include their sensitivity towards pollutants and ready accumulator of pollutants into their thallus. Algal metabolism is sensitive to environmental disturbances and responds quickly both in species density and composition to a wide range of water conditions. For instance, increasing the acidity of water in presence of acid-forming chemicals discharged from industrial areas may affect the density and composition of algae differently. However, some algal genera can tolerate these water conditions (Omar 2010). A list of algal species associated with biomonitoring of water is provided in Table 1.
Periphytopnic algae are widely used as a biological monitoring tool for water quality. They are sensitive to various environmental conditions, which are detected in their species composition, density, chlorophyll content, enzyme activity, and ash-free dry mass (AFDM) (Briggs 1985; Newman et al. 1985; Cosgrove et al. 2004). Diatoms have also been abundantly used for monitoring water quality. Diatoms provide multiple indicators of environmental change with precise data in comparison to zoological and chemical assessments (Round 1991).
In England, five algal species were selected as bioindicators of river pollution. In heavily polluted rivers, algal species Stigeoclonium tenue was observed in the downstream region, whereas species Gomphonema parvulum and Nitzschia palea appeared dominant at the mid polluted zone and species Chamaesiphon and Cocconeis were reported to thrive in the unpolluted parts of the stream (Butcher 1949). Later, the species Gomphonema and Navicula accomoda were also noted as good indicators of sewage water pollution (Archibald 1972). Diatoms like Gyrosigma attenuatum and Amphora ovalis were observed to be affected by higher contents of organics in water (Patrick 1948).
Blue-green algae like Oscillatoria and Phormidium, diatoms like Synedra and Navicula, and green algae like Chlamydomonas and Euglena were reported to have good tolerance to organic pollution (Palmer 1969). Dell’Aglio et al. (2017) utilized the redox potential curves of respiration and photosynthesis of a green algae Scenedesmus sp. for biomonitoring of pollution caused by toxic drugs in water bodies. Their studies revealed Scenedesmus sp. as an efficient biomonitoring tool for toxic drug pollution in an aquatic environment. Two green algae, Enteromorpha intestinalis and Cladophora glomerata, were used to measure heavy metal pollution in Wadi Hanifah stream, Saudi Arabia. Concentrations of manganese (Mn), arsenic (As), zinc (Zn), copper (Cu), cadmium (Cd), and lead (Pb) were measured from the dried biomass of these two algal species. The study showed E. intestinalis as an excellent indicator of Mn, As, and Zn while species C. glomerata indicated Cu, Cd, and Pb pollution (Al-Homaidan et al. 2021).
Like their freshwater counterparts, marine algae are also being utilized as biomonitoring agents of water pollution. A brown algae Sargassum furcatum with its associated amphipods were utilized for the indication of petroleum hydrocarbon pollution in the marine ecosystem of São Sebastião Channel of south-eastern Brazil (Lourenço et al. 2019). In the Black Sea of Turkey, marine algae were used to assess the heavy metal pollution and their accumulation in the algal thallus. Species Cryptogamia, Cystoseira, and Ulva were reported to accumulate copper, cadmium, iron (Fe), lead, zinc, and thallium (Tl) into their thallus indicating heavy metal pollution (Parus and Karbowska 2020). Similarly, four red algal species, Corallina panizzoi, Antithamnion cruciatum, Ceramium panizzoi, and Porphyra umbilicalis were assessed to measure heavy metals like nickel, copper, manganese, cobalt (Co), lead, and cadmium in the Black Sea coast of Samsun, Turkey (Arici and Bat 2016).
Recently, Cd concentration in the thalli of three brown algae species i.e., Sargassum sp., Padina sp., and Turbinaria sp. from North Bais Bay were studied (Ho and Bantoto-Kinamot 2021). Their study showed that Sargasum sp. contained the highest concentration of Cd which ranged from 2.14 to 4.45 mg kg−1 followed by Padina sp. (2.2 to 3.4 mg kg−1) and Turbunaia sp. (2.36 to 2.76 mg kg−1). They concluded brown algae as an effective bio-indicators of marine Cd contamination.
In crux, the algal diversity in polluted water indicates its usefulness as a bioindicator. The resistant algal species can be further explored for their possible use in the field of bioremediation.
Energy production by algae
The world is facing a major crisis in energy production with increasing population and demand for energy. The use of fossil fuels on a larger scale increased the CO2 levels and other greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. Thus, there is an urgent need for renewable and environment-friendly fuel to fulfill the world’s energy demand (Schenk et al. 2008). To meet the demand, algae can be used as the major source of biofuel due to their safe, noncompetitive, and rapid growth. Moreover, algae can be utilized to produce electricity. Various methods for the production of bioenergy from algae were illustrated in Fig. 2.
Production of biofuel from algae
Algal cells contain a wide range of fatty acids, carbohydrates, lipids, and proteins. The oil content of microalgae can be 20–50%, but it has been observed that in some species it can go up to 80% (Metting 1996; Spolaore et al. 2006). The oil-rich species are considered ideal to produce biofuels that can substitute fossil fuels like diesel, kerosene, and gasoline. Being carbon neutral, the algal biofuels are ideal for the environment and economic sustainability (Chisti 2007; Slade and Bauen 2013). Algae associated with the production of biofuel are enlisted in Table 2.
Rutz and Janssen (2007) put forward some standard methods like sedimentation, flocculation, filtration, flotation, or electrophoresis for harvesting microalgae to produce biodiesel. The production of biodiesel is generally done with the methods like pyrolysis, micro-emulsification, and transesterification (Demirbas 2009; Musa 2016; Akubude et al. 2019). Among all these methods; transesterification is most widely used to produce biodiesel from microalgae (Xu et al. 2006; Koberg et al. 2011). Apart from biodiesel production; microalgae are also used for generating bio-hydrogen by photobiological process (Fedorov et al. 2005; Kapdan and Kargi 2006), bio-methane by anaerobic digestion (Spolaore et al. 2006; Heaven et al. 2011), bioethanol by fermentation (Fu and Dexter 2007; Choi et al. 2010), and liquid oil by thermal liquefaction (Banerjee et al. 2002; Miao and Wu 2004; Xu et al. 2006).
Pradana et al. (2017) successfully cultivated microalgae Nannochloropsis sp., Botryococcus braunii, and Arthrospira platensis at different regions of Indonesia to produce biodiesel. Gouveia and Oliveira (2009) screened microalgae, Chlorella vulgaris, Spirulina maxima, Nannochloropsis sp., Neochloris oleoabundans, Scenedesmus obliquus, and Dunaliella tertiolecta for the production of biodiesel. The freshwater algal species Neochloris oleoabundans and marine Nannochloropsis sp. had the highest oil content of 29% and 28.7%, respectively (Gouveia and Oliveira 2009). Rahman et al. (2017) successfully synthesized biodiesel from species Spirulina maxima by using the transesterification process.
Studies showed that both biodiesel and bioethanol could be extracted from algae simultaneously by removing lipids from the algal biomass for fermentation (Dragone et al. 2010). The extracted lipids gave 60% bioethanol in concentration compared to dried biomass without lipid extraction. Harun et al. (2010) extracted lipids from Chlorococcus sp. and fermented them to produce bioethanol. However, little work has been done on the production of biomethane from microalgae using the anaerobic digestion method. Golueke et al. (1957) digested algal species Chlorella and Scenedesmus from wastewater ponds that produced 0.25–0.50 L CH4/g at 11 days of retention time at an incubated temperature of 35–50 °C. These studies proved microalgae as an excellent choice for sustainable biofuel production. However, advanced and affordable technologies are yet to develop. Along with biofuel production, microalgae are associated with various food and pharmaceutical products, tools for phycoremediation, bio-fertilizers, etc. Industries are fronting complications in escalating the processes (Saad et al. 2019). One of the most crucial challenges is the screening of the microalgal strains with a higher lipid-producing ability and modifying them through genetic and metabolic engineering for rapid growth and lipid production (Saad et al. 2019).
Production of electricity from algae
Algal biomass is suitable for energy conversion technologies, which include anaerobic digestion or microbial fuel cell (MFC). These MFC are interesting renewable energy technology where photosynthetic organisms are used to generate electricity (Strik et al. 2008; González Del Campo et al. 2013). Electrons generated from the algal biomass are moved to the external circuit to produce electricity (Rosenbaum et al. 2010; Wang et al. 2010). Normally pure organic compounds like glucose, acetate, and cysteine are used as substrates at the anode, but wastewater can also be used as a substrate (Rodrigo et al. 2007; Martin et al. 2010). Rashid et al. (2013) selected Scenedesmus sp. as a suitable substrate in MFC due to its high lipid content and potential nutrient source for microbes at the anode. It produced a much higher power density than any other reported substrates. Algal biomass served as both waste management and power generation. Similar experiments were also done by Strik et al. (2008) where a mixture of algal species was taken as a substrate in MFC for electricity generation. Gajda et al. (2015) connected an algal photobioreactor with an MFC to manufacture a continuous power generator system. The bioreactors can continuously supply the algal biomass which served as a substrate. Fasahati et al. (2017) utilized brown algae Laminaria japonica for the production of electricity using anaerobic digestion. Thus, algal biomass is a promising way for the sustainable production of electricity.
Algae as the potential candidate for bioremediation
Algae are being well utilized for the bioremediation of water pollutants and the process is known as phytoremediation. Water pollutants include inorganic nutrients including heavy metals, several organic compounds (hydrocarbons, polychlorinated biphenyls, insecticides, and detergents), and radioactive isotopes (Dixit and Singh 2015). Table 3 enlists some algal species which are used for their bioremediation abilities,
Microalgae use several mechanisms for the bioremediation of pollutants while enhancing their tolerance to detoxify or degrade the pollutants. For example, they transform the heavy metals into sulfides, which make these metals insoluble and consequently lowering toxicity and availability (Edwards et al. 2013). Another mechanism is the absorption of toxicants into their biomass (Mehta and Gaur 2005). They do so because of their large surface:volume ratio, presence of metal-binding groups on their surface, and the efficient metal uptake and storage systems (Rajamani et al. 2007). Microalgae can take part in the bioremediation of acidic wastewater by generating alkalinity via nitrate assimilation, especially from acid mine drainage (Das et al. 2009). Studies also documented the efficacy of microalgae and cyanobacteria in the degradation of organic chemicals including pesticides, phenolic compounds, tributyltin, naphthalene, bisphenol, and other hydrocarbons (Joseph and Joseph 2001; Todd et al. 2002; Barton et al. 2004; Hirooka et al. 2005; Singh and Walker 2006). Figure 3 Illustrates different processes of bioremediation utilized by algae in controlling various organic and inorganic pollutants.
Microalgae in the removal of inorganic pollutants
Microalgae remove nitrogen and phosphorous from water as these elements are beneficial for their growth and development. Besides, they are capable of degrading inorganic pollutants like heavy metals. Microalgae insolubilize the heavy metals by converting them into sulfides and making them unavailable (Phang et al. 2015). It was observed that when the cyanobacterium Synechococcus leopoliensis, green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, and red alga Cyanidioschyzon merolae were exposed to cadmium, they detoxified the heavy metal by converting it into cadmium sulfide (Edwards et al. 2013). Similarly, the red alga Galdieria sulphuraria converted 90% of Hg (II) into metacinnabar (βHgS) within 20 min of exposure (Kelly et al. 2007). Gong et al. (2011) found that a microalgae Chlorella vulgaris could accelerate the aggregation of nickel oxide which reduces its valency to zero.
According to Perales-Vela et al. (2006), microalgae can produce phytochelatins to take part in the chelation of heavy metals and thus help in detoxification. Three genera of green algae Rhizoclonium sp., Oedogonium sp., and Hydrodictyon sp. are reported to accumulate vanadium (V) and arsenic (As) from wastewater into their biomass (Saunders et al. 2014). Similarly, Spirogyra hyalina was found to be useful in removing cadmium, lead, mercury, arsenic, and cobalt (Kumar and Oommen 2012). Dead biomass of Arthrospira sp. can detoxify chromium (Cr) by reducing Cr (IV) to Cr (III). In a study to remove acid wastewater derived from a mining site, the consortium of Oscillatoria sp. was found beneficial to remove sulfate and precipitate metals like Pb, Zn, Fe, Co, and Cu. Besides, the acidity of the water was reduced as the pH increased from 2.93 to 6.78 (Sheoran and Bhandari 2005). In Microspora sp. high metal accumulation potential was observed in the acid mine drainage system (AMD) of Malanjkhand copper mine. The alga was able to accumulate Fe and Cu from 0.95 to 9.14% and 1.74 to 3.66% respectively (Equeenuddin et al. 2021).
Microalgae in remediation of organic pollutants
Cyanobacteria and microalgae have a very huge potential in removing organic pollutants from water bodies. It was found that nutrients in the form of carbon sources like glucose could increase the growth and capacity of microalgae in degrading organic pollutants (Megharaj et al. 1994; Tikoo et al. 1997; Papazi and Kotzabasis 2007; Papazi et al. 2012). For example, the growth and catabolic activity of Scenedesmus obliquus has increased the degrading ability of halogenated phenols in presence of glucose. Further investigation on Scenedesmus obliquus revealed that algae can even degrade p-cresol (toxic) and can utilize it as an alternate energy source(Papazi and Kotzabasis 2007; Papazi et al. 2012). Similarly, Scenedesmus acutus, S. quadricauda, Coelastrum reticulatum, and Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata were reported to metabolize biophenol (Nakajima et al. 2007). There are reports of cyanobacteria and microalgae in removing harmful insecticides and utilizing them as a source of phosphorous (Megharaj et al. 1994).
Inoculation of a consortium of several microalgae (Chlorococcus, Anabaena cylindrica, Chlorella, Scenedesmus quadricauda, and Spirulina platensis) into pond water containing wastewater has led to the removal of endocrine-disrupting pesticides like 17β-estradiol and estrone by involving the processes like bioabsorption and biodegradation (Shi et al. 2010). Dotto et al. (2013) demonstrated the usefulness of nanoparticles from Spirulina sp. in removing phenols by absorption. Along with pesticides, antibiotic contamination is a major problem in water bodies. Diatoms producing hydroxyl radicals can degrade these antibiotics efficiently. Studies showed that diatoms can produce such hydroxyl-radicals by bio-fenton process which can readily degrade tetracycline from wastewater (Pariyarath et al. 2021). In oceanic water, the presence of proteinaceous ossein effluents poses a serious threat to the marine ecosystem. Moreover, Ca- and Cl-rich compounds are very hard to remove and also have a strong odor (Das et al. 2011). Gelatin-producing industries are the major sources of this ossein. However, Ameen et al. (2021) came up with the strategy of using marine cyanobacterium Cylindrospermum stagnale to remove these pollutants. Their study documented that C. stagnale can degrade ossein effluents optimally when cultured with effluents and seawater in the ratio of 1:1.
Thus, utilizing the potentiality of microalgae for the treatment of organic and inorganic pollutants has become a major trend in recent times. Identification of new ideal species for the bioremediation process and the introduction of these algal species to the polluted sites can benefit in overcoming different levels of water pollution.
Cyanobacteria in nitrogen cycling and its fixation
The fixation of atmospheric nitrogen through specialized cells of cyanobacteria is termed as heterocysts and was first demonstrated by Fogg (1949) in Anabaena cylindrica. The fixed nitrogen becomes available to the plants and the other organisms in the surrounding environment when it is released in the form of polypeptides, free amino acids, ammonia, vitamins, and auxin like substances either by cell secretion or by microbial degradation (Subramanian and Shanmugasundaram 1986; Rana et al. 2012). It has been estimated that around 32 Tg of nitrogen is fixed by cyanobacteria annually, among which paddy fields are considered to be the most suitable habitat. Approximately 4 kg N haˉ1 is supplied by cyanobacterial biomass in the rice ecosystem, and their N2 fixing ability is widely studied (Vaishampayan et al. 2001). Asia being the largest rice producer depends mostly on cyanobacterial N2 fixation.
Cyanobacterial species like Anabaena iyengarii, A. fertilissima, Nostoc commune, N. ellipso-sporum, and N. linckia have been reported with exceptional N2-fixing ability (Pereira et al. 2009). Increased rice yields were recorded from India and Japan due to the inoculation of cyanobacteria (Vaishampayan et al. 2001). In wheat crops, in vitro inoculation of cyanobacteria has raised plant shoot/root length along with fresh and dry yield weight (Spiller and Gunasekaran 1990; Obreht et al. 1993). Soil inoculation with biofilms of Anabaena sp. increased nitrogen in wheat fields from 40% to 57.42% compared to control (Swarnalakshmi et al. 2013). Apart from rice and wheat, the cyanobacterial-induced nitrogen fixation has a wide scope in cotton, a variety of vegetables, and other food crops (Osman et al. 2010; Prasanna et al. 2016). In pea plants, two cyanobacteria Nostoc entophytum and Oscillatoria augustissima have great potential as biofertilizer as they can save 50% in chemical fertilizers and add nutritional value in pea seeds (Osman et al. 2010).
Thus, the use of cyanobacteria to provide nitrogen in the crop field is not only cost-efficient but also serves as an alternative environment-friendly source compared to mineral fertilizer.
Potential use of algae in fighting climate change
In the present times, 80% of annual energy produced worldwide is generated from the combustion of fossil fuels. It has been estimated that more than 24 Gigatons (Gt) of CO2 is emitted in this process of combustion (Lewis and Nocera 2006). In 2019, the atmospheric CO2 reached 409.8 ± 0.1 ppm which was recorded to be the highest CO2 level in over 800,000 years (Lindsey 2020). This accumulated atmospheric CO2 has contributed substantially to global warming, climate change, and extinction of various species (Lewis and Nocera 2006; Battisti and Naylor 2009). Thus, the use of CO2-free energy sources has become essential in controlling global warming. These sustainable sources of energy like solar energy may be promising, but the initial cost is very high, and they pollute the environment with lead and cadmium. There are also very few selected areas of the world, where wind and hydropower plants can be opted. Additionally, biofuels may be environment-friendly but they also release CO2 and CH4 during combustion (Haoyang 2018). However, algae thrive by removing the CO2 and storing it into their biomass via photosynthesis at very faster rates. Thus, making them an ideal candidate for trapping CO2. It has been estimated that 1 kg of algae uses around 1.87 kg of CO2 daily. One acre of algae can utilize 2.7 tons of CO2 every day (Anguselvi et al. 2019). Comparative studies found that a 25-year-old maple beech-birch forest only utilizes 2.18 kg of CO2 daily, but the equal amount can be fixed by only 1.17 kg of algae (Toochi 2018). There are two major cultivation techniques of algae such as open-oceanic algal blooms and photobioreactors that can be utilized for trapping CO2 from the atmosphere. Microalgae under the presence of a higher concentration of CO2 from flue gas or soluble carbonate have significantly increased their CO2 and biomass productivity (Yoo et al. 2010; Sydney et al. 2010; Kuo et al. 2017). Thus, cultivating algae for CO2 trapping can be a promising approach in fighting global warming and climate change and reducing industrial pollution.
Open-oceanic algal blooms
Algae are abundant on the surface of the open ocean water making them ideal for CO2 trapping; also, the ocean water provides enormous space for their growth. Algal blooms can be massively increased by adding iron (II) sulfate. This cultivation technique has been pictured to be the most promising because ocean water is the largest reservoir of algae and amount of CO2 trapping is directly proportional to the number of algae that undergoes photosynthesis. Oceanic algal blooms are also very cost-efficient, as it only requires iron (II) sulfate and there is no need for constant maintenance (Haoyang 2018). The overabundant algal biomass can also be collected and utilized for the production of biofuels (Ghosh and Kiran 2017; Kumar et al. 2018; Nath et al. 2019). Ecologically, the overabundant algae on the ocean surfaces are consumed by shellfishes where the carbon contents of algal biomass are incorporated into the shells of the shellfishes as calcium carbonate (Haoyang 2018).
Photobioreactors
Photobioreactors are artificially made growth chambers having controlled nutrient levels and pH for the optimum growth of algae (Adeniyi et al. 2018). In comparison to oceanic algal blooms, photobioreactors have much more photosynthetic rates due to high algal concentrations per unit area. Nutrients like iron and magnesium and vitamins are added to the photobioreactors to increase the photosynthetic rate and to decrease the rate of evaporation. Photobioreactors can also utilize wastewater as a nutrient source making it an alternate approach to remove pollutants from water (Adeniyi et al. 2018). The only drawback is that the cost and maintenance of photobioreactors are high.
Thus, engineering interference is needed to manufacture more cost-efficient photobioreactors.
Conclusions
Algal biomasses represent a valuable source of environment-friendly strategies in overcoming some of the major environmental issues the world is facing today. Though research in this area has gained momentum in the last 3–4 decades, but many algal species have remained unattended. Therefore, scientific intervention is essential for identifying the biological potential of microalgae and their efficient application to facilitate the benefits to humankind and betterment of the planet earth.
Data availability
Not applicable
References
Adeniyi OM, Azimov U, Burluka A (2018) Algae biofuel: current status and future applications. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 90:316–335
Akubude VC, Nwaigwe KN, Dintwa E (2019) Production of biodiesel from microalgae via nanocatalyzed transesterification process: a review. Mater Sci Energy Technol 2:216–225
Al-Homaidan AA, Al-Ghanayem AA, Al-Qahtani HS et al (2021) Effect of sampling time on the heavy metal concentrations of brown algae: a bioindicator study on the Arabian gulf coast. Chemosphere 263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127998
Ameen F, Al-Homaidan AA, Alsamhary K, et al (2021) Bioremediation of ossein effluents using the filamentous marine cyanobacterium Cylindrospermum stangnale. Environ Pollut 284:117507
Anguselvi V, Ebhin Masto R, Mukherjee A, Kumar Singh P (2019) CO 2 capture for industries by algae. In: Yong YK (ed). Algae. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.81800
Archibald REM (1972) Diversity in some south African diatom associations and its relation to water quality. Water Res 6:1229–1238. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(72)90023-1
Arici E, Bat L (2016) Red algae as bioindicators of heavy metal pollution from Samsun coasts of Turkey. In: 41st CIESM Congress, Kiel (Germany). pp 12–16
Banerjee A, Sharma R, Chisti Y, Banerjee UC (2002) Botryococcus braunii: a renewable source of hydrocarbons and other chemicals. Crit Rev Biotechnol 22:245–279
Barton JW, Kuritz T, O’Connor LE et al (2004) Reductive transformation of methyl parathion by the cyanobacterium Anabaena sp. strain PCC7120. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 65:330–335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-004-1557-y
Battisti DS, Naylor RL (2009) Historical warnings of future food insecurity with unprecedented seasonal heat. Science (80- ) 323:240–244. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1164363
Briggs BJ (1985) Use of periphyton in the monitoring of water quality. Water soil Misc Publ Water Soil Conserv Auth 117–142
Butcher RW (1949) Pollution and re-purification as indicated by the algae. In: Fourth Internat. Congress for Microbiology, pp 149–150
Carlson RE (1977) A trophic state index for lakes. Limnol Oceanogr 22:361–369. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1977.22.2.0361
Chisti Y (2007) Biodiesel from microalgae. Biotechnol Adv 25:294–306
Choi SP, Nguyen MT, Sim SJ (2010) Enzymatic pretreatment of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii biomass for ethanol production. Bioresour Technol 101:5330–5336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.02.026
Cosgrove J, Walker D, Morrison P, Hillman K (2004) Periphyton indicate effects of wastewater discharge in the near-coastal zone, Perth (Western Australia). Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 61:331–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2004.05.008
Das BK, Roy A, Koschorreck M et al (2009) Occurrence and role of algae and fungi in acid mine drainage environment with special reference to metals and sulfate immobilization. Water Res 43:883–894
Das P, Aziz SS, Obbard JP (2011) Two phase microalgae growth in the open system for enhanced lipid productivity. Renew Energy 36:2524–2528
de Godos I, Muñoz R, Guieysse B (2012) Tetracycline removal during wastewater treatment in high-rate algal ponds. J Hazard Mater 229–230:446–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.05.106
Dell’Aglio E, Cosentino F, Campanella L (2017) Use of algae Scenedesmus as bioindicators of water pollution from active ingredients. J Anal Pharm Res 6:189
Demirbas A (2009) Production of biodiesel fuels from linseed oil using methanol and ethanol in non-catalytic SCF conditions. Biomass Bioenerg 33:113–118
Dixit S, Singh DP (2015) Phycoremediation: Future Perspective of Green Technology BT. In: Singh B, Bauddh K, Bux F (eds) Algae and Environmental Sustainability. Springer India, New Delhi, pp 9–21
Dotto GL, Costa JAV, Pinto LAA (2013) Kinetic studies on the biosorption of phenol by nanoparticles from Spirulina sp. LEB 18. J Environ Chem Eng 1:1137–1143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2013.08.029
Dragone G, Fernandes B, Vicente A, Teixeira J (2010) Third generation biofuels from microalgae. In: Mendez-Vilas A (ed) Curr Res Technol Educ Top Appl Microbiol Microb Biotechnol 1355–1366
Edwards CD, Beatty JC, Loiselle JBR et al (2013) Aerobic transformation of cadmium through metal sulfide biosynthesis in photosynthetic microorganisms. BMC Microbiol 13:1–11
Equeenuddin SM, Bisoi KC, Barik CK (2021) Natural attenuation of metals by algal mat from acid mine drainage at Malanjkhand copper mine. Arab J Geosci 14:680. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-07012-7
Fasahati P, Saffron CM, Woo HC, Liu JJ (2017) Potential of brown algae for sustainable electricity production through anaerobic digestion. Energy Convers Manag 135:297–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.12.084
Fedorov AS, Kosourov S, Ghirardi ML, Seibert M (2005) Continuous hydrogen photoproduction by Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 121:403–412. https://doi.org/10.1385/ABAB:121:1-3:0403
Fogg GE (1949) Growth and heterocyst production in Anabaena cylindrica lemm.: II. in relation to carbon and nitrogen metabolism. Ann Bot 13:241–259
Fu P, Dexter J (2007) Metabolic engineering of cyanobacteria for bioenergy production. In: Topical Conference on Energy Processes (2007), Held at the 2007 AIChE Spring National Meeting, pp 114
Gajda I, Greenman J, Melhuish C, Ieropoulos I (2015) Self-sustainable electricity production from algae grown in a microbial fuel cell system. Biomass Bioenerg 82:87–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.05.017
Ghosh A, Kiran B (2017) Carbon concentration in algae: reducing CO2 from exhaust Gas. Trends Biotechnol 35:806–808
Golueke CG, Oswald WJ, Gotaas HB (1957) Anaerobic digestion of algae. Appl Microbiol 5:47–55
Gong N, Shao K, Feng W et al (2011) Biotoxicity of nickel oxide nanoparticles and bio-remediation by microalgae Chlorella vulgaris. Chemosphere 83:510–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.12.059
González Del Campo A, Cañizares P, Rodrigo MA et al (2013) Microbial fuel cell with an algae-assisted cathode: a preliminary assessment. J Power Sources 242:638–645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.05.110
Gouveia L, Oliveira AC (2009) Microalgae as a raw material for biofuels production. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 36:269–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-008-0495-6
Haoyang C (2018) Algae-based carbon sequestration. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 120:12011
Harun R, Danquah MK, Forde GM (2010) Microalgal biomass as a fermentation feedstock for bioethanol production. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 85:199–203. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.2287
Heaven S, Milledge J, Zhang Y (2011) Comments on “Anaerobic digestion of microalgae as a necessary step to make microalgal biodiesel sustainable.” Biotechnol Adv 29:164–167
Hirooka T, Nagase H, Uchida K et al (2005) Biodegradation of bisphenol A and disappearance of its estrogenic activity by the green alga Chlorella fusca var. vacuolata. Environ Toxicol Chem 24:1896–1901. https://doi.org/10.1897/04-259R.1
Ho MTG, Bantoto-Kinamot V (2021) Sargassum, Padina and Turbinaria as bioindicators of cadmium in Bais Bay. The Palawan Scientist 13(1):90–98
Joseph V, Joseph A (2001) Microalgae in petrochemical effluent: growth and biosorption of total dissolved solids. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 66:522–527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-001-0038-6
Kapdan IK, Kargi F (2006) Bio-hydrogen production from waste materials. Enzyme Microb Technol 38:569–582
Karr JR, Chu EW (1999) Restoring life in running waters: better biological monitoring. Island Press, Washington, D.C.
Karthikeyan N, Prasanna R, Nain L, Kaushik BD (2007) Evaluating the potential of plant growth promoting cyanobacteria as inoculants for wheat. Eur J Soil Biol 43:23–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2006.11.001
Kelly DJA, Budd K, Lefebvre DD (2007) Biotransformation of mercury in pH-stat cultures of eukaryotic freshwater algae. Arch Microbiol 187:45–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-006-0170-0
Koberg M, Cohen M, Ben-Amotz A, Gedanken A (2011) Bio-diesel production directly from the microalgae biomass of Nannochloropsis by microwave and ultrasound radiation. Bioresour Technol 102:4265–4269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.12.004
Kumar JIN, Oommen C (2012) Removal of heavy metals by biosorption using freshwater alga Spirogyra hyalina. J Environ Biol 33:27
Kumar A, Kaushal S, Saraf SA, Singh JS (2018) Microbial bio-fuels: a solution to carbon emissions and energy crisis. Front Biosci - Landmark 23:1789–1802. https://doi.org/10.2741/4673
Kuo CM, Lin TH, Yang YC et al (2017) Ability of an alkali-tolerant mutant strain of the microalga Chlorella sp. AT1 to capture carbon dioxide for increasing carbon dioxide utilization efficiency. Bioresour Technol 244:243–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.07.096
Laitat E (1994) Biological indicators in environmental protection, M. Kovacs (Ed.), Ellis Horwood, London (1992), 207 pp.(ISBN 963–05–6027–5). Price: $67.50
Lewis NS, Nocera DG (2006) Powering the planet: chemical challenges in solar energy utilization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:15729–15735
Likens GE (2009) Encyclopedia of inland waters. Elsevier
Lindsey R (2020) Climate change: atmospheric carbon dioxide. Climate.gov. https://www.climate.gov/news-features/understandingclimate/climate-change-atmospheric-carbon-dioxide. Accessed 20 Oct 2020
Lourenço RA, Magalhães CA, Taniguchi S et al (2019) Evaluation of macroalgae and amphipods as bioindicators of petroleum hydrocarbons input into the marine environment. Mar Pollut Bull 145:564–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.05.052
Martin E, Savadogo O, Guiot SR, Tartakovsky B (2010) The influence of operational conditions on the performance of a microbial fuel cell seeded with mesophilic anaerobic sludge. Biochem Eng J 51:132–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2010.06.006
McCormick PV, Cairns J (1994) Algae as indicators of environmental change. J Appl Phycol 6:509–526. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02182405
Megharaj M, Madhavi DR, Sreenivasulu C et al (1994) Biodegradation of methyl parathion by soil isolates of microalgae and cyanobacteria. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 53:292–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00192047
Mehta SK, Gaur JP (2005) Use of algae for removing heavy metal ions from wastewater: Progress and prospects. Crit Rev Biotechnol 25:113–152
Metting FB (1996) Biodiversity and application of microalgae. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 17:477–489. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01574779
Miao X, Wu Q (2004) High yield bio-oil production from fast pyrolysis by metabolic controlling of Chlorella protothecoides. J Biotechnol 110:85–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2004.01.013
Milledge JJ (2011) Commercial application of microalgae other than as biofuels: a brief review. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 10:31–41
Musa IA (2016) The effects of alcohol to oil molar ratios and the type of alcohol on biodiesel production using transesterification process. Egypt J Pet 25:21–31
Nakajima N, Teramoto T, Kasai F et al (2007) Glycosylation of bisphenol A by freshwater microalgae. Chemosphere 69:934–941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.05.088
Nath A, Tiwari PK, Rai AK, Sundaram S (2019) Evaluation of carbon capture in competent microalgal consortium for enhanced biomass, lipid, and carbohydrate production. 3 Biotech 9:379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-019-1910-6
Neuwoehner J, Escher BI (2011) The pH-dependent toxicity of basic pharmaceuticals in the green algae Scenedesmus vacuolatus can be explained with a toxicokinetic ion-trapping model. Aquat Toxicol 101:266–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2010.10.008
Newman MC, Alberts JJ, Greenhut VA (1985) Geochemical factors complicating the use of aufwuchs to monitor bioaccumulation of arsenic, cadmium, chromium, copper and zinc. Water Res 19:1157–1165. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(85)90352-5
Obreht Z, Kerby NW, Gantar M, Rowell P (1993) Effects of root-associated N2-fixing cyanobacteria on the growth and nitrogen content of wheat (Triticum vulgare L.) seedlings. Biol Fertil Soils 15:68–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00336292
Omar WMW (2010) Perspectives on the use of algae as biological indicators for monitoring and protecting aquatic environments, with special reference to Malaysian freshwater ecosystems. Trop Life Sci Res 21:51
Osman MEH, El-Sheekh MM, El-Naggar AH, Gheda SF (2010) Effect of two species of cyanobacteria as biofertilizers on some metabolic activities, growth, and yield of pea plant. Biol Fertil Soils 46:861–875. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-010-0491-7
Palmer CM (1969) A composite rating of algae tolerating organic pollution. J Phycol 5:78–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-8817.1969.tb02581.x
Papazi A, Kotzabasis K (2007) Bioenergetic strategy of microalgae for the biodegradation of phenolic compounds-exogenously supplied energy and carbon sources adjust the level of biodegradation. J Biotechnol 129:706–716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2007.02.021
Papazi A, Assimakopoulos K, Kotzabasis K (2012) Bioenergetic strategy for the biodegradation of p-cresol by the unicellular green alga Scenedesmus obliquus. PLoS One 7:e51852
Pariyarath RV, Inagaki Y, Sakakibara Y (2021) Phycoremediation of tetracycline via bio-Fenton process using diatoms. J Water Process Eng 40:101851
Parus A, Karbowska B (2020) Marine Algae as natural indicator of environmental cleanliness. Water Air Soil Pollut 231:97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-020-4434-0
Patrick R (1948) Factors effecting the distribution of diatoms. Bot Rev 14:473–524
Perales-Vela HV, Peña-Castro JM, Cañizares-Villanueva RO (2006) Heavy metal detoxification in eukaryotic microalgae. Chemosphere 64:1–10
Pereira I, Ortega R, Barrientos L et al (2009) Development of a biofertilizer based on filamentous nitrogen-fixing cyanobacteria for rice crops in Chile. J Appl Phycol 21:135–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-008-9342-4
Phang S-M, Chu W-L, Rabiei R (2015) Phycoremediation BT. In: Sahoo D, Seckbach J (eds) The Algae World. Springer, Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 357–389
Pradana YS, Sudibyo H, Suyono EA et al (2017) Oil Algae extraction of selected microalgae species grown in monoculture and mixed cultures for biodiesel production. Energy Procedia 105:277–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.314
Prasanna R, Kanchan A, Ramakrishnan B et al (2016) Cyanobacteria-based bioinoculants influence growth and yields by modulating the microbial communities favourably in the rhizospheres of maize hybrids. Eur J Soil Biol 75:15–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2016.04.001
Rahman MA, Aziz MA, Al-Khulaidi RA et al (2017) Biodiesel production from microalgae S pirulina maxima by two step process: Optimization of process variable. J Radiat Res Appl Sci 10:140–147
Rajakumari K, Ridhanya J (2021) Algae-pollution indicator and control. Res J Pharm Technol 14:523–526
Rajamani S, Siripornadulsil S, Falcao V et al (2007) Phycoremediation of heavy metals using transgenic microalgae. Adv Exp Med Biol 616:99–109
Rana A, Joshi M, Prasanna R et al (2012) Biofortification of wheat through inoculation of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and cyanobacteria. Eur J Soil Biol 50:118–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2012.01.005
Rashid N, Cui YF, Muhammad SUR, Han JI (2013) Enhanced electricity generation by using algae biomass and activated sludge in microbial fuel cell. Sci Total Environ 456–457:91–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.03.067
Rodrigo MA, Cañizares P, Lobato J et al (2007) Production of electricity from the treatment of urban waste water using a microbial fuel cell. J Power Sources 169:198–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.01.054
Rosenbaum M, He Z, Angenent LT (2010) Light energy to bioelectricity: photosynthetic microbial fuel cells. Curr Opin Biotechnol 21:259–264
Round FE (1991) Diatoms in river water-monitoring studies. J Appl Phycol 3:129–145
Rutz D, Janssen R (2007) Biofuel technology handbook. WIP Renewable Energies, Munich
Saad MG, Dosoky NS, Zoromba MS, Shafik HM (2019) Algal biofuels: current status and key challenges. Energies 12:1920
Saunders RJ, Paul NA, Hu Y, De Nys R (2014) Sustainable sources of biomass for bioremediation of heavy metals in waste water derived from coal-fired power generation. Heavy Met Contam Water Soil Anal Assessment, Remediat Strateg 7:285–303. https://doi.org/10.1201/b16566
Schenk PM, Thomas-Hall SR, Stephens E et al (2008) Second generation biofuels: high-efficiency microalgae for biodiesel production. Springer 1:20–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-008-9008-8
Sheoran AS, Bhandari S (2005) Treatment of mine water by a microbial mat: bench-scale experiments. Mine Water Environ 24:38–42
Shi W, Wang L, Rousseau DPL, Lens PNL (2010) Removal of estrone, 17α-ethinylestradiol, and 17ß-estradiol in algae and duckweed-based wastewater treatment systems. Environ Sci Pollut Res 17:824–833. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-010-0301-7
Singh BK, Walker A (2006) Microbial degradation of organophosphorus compounds. FEMS Microbiol Rev 30:428–471
Slade R, Bauen A (2013) Micro-Algae cultivation for biofuels: cost, energy balance, environmental impacts and future prospects. Biomass Bioenerg 53:29–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.12.019
Spiller H, Gunasekaran M (1990) Ammonia-excreting mutant strain of the cyanobacterium Anabaena variabilis supports growth of wheat. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 33:477–480
Spolaore P, Joannis-Cassan C, Duran E, Isambert A (2006) Commercial applications of microalgae. J Biosci Bioeng 101:87–96
Strik DPBTB, Terlouw H, Hamelers HVM, Buisman CJN (2008) Renewable sustainable biocatalyzed electricity production in a photosynthetic algal microbial fuel cell (PAMFC). Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 81:659–668. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-008-1679-8
Subramanian G, Shanmugasundaram S (1986) Uninduced ammonia release by the nitrogen-fixing cyanobacterium Anabaena. FEMS Microbiol Lett 37:151–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.1986.tb01784.x
Swain SS, Paidesetty SK, Padhy RN (2017) Antibacterial, antifungal and antimycobacterial compounds from cyanobacteria. Biomed Pharmacother 90:760–776
Swarnalakshmi K, Prasanna R, Kumar A et al (2013) Evaluating the influence of novel cyanobacterial biofilmed biofertilizers on soil fertility and plant nutrition in wheat. Eur J Soil Biol 55:107–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2012.12.008
Sydney EB, Sturm W, de Carvalho JC et al (2010) Potential carbon dioxide fixation by industrially important microalgae. Bioresour Technol 101:5892–5896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.02.088
Tikoo V, Scragg AH, Shales SW (1997) Degradation of pentachlorophenol by microalgae. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 68:425–431. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-4660(199704)68:4<425::aid-jctb649>3.0.co;2-o
Todd SJ, Cain RB, Schmidt S (2002) Biotransformation of naphthalene and diaryl ethers by green microalgae. Biodegradation 13:229–238. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021245404675
Toochi EC (2018) Carbon sequestration: how much can forestry sequester CO2. For Res Eng Int J 2:148–150
Vaishampayan A, Sinha RP, Häder DP et al (2001) Cyanobacterial biofertilizers in rice agriculture. Bot Rev 67:453–516
Vernouillet G, Eullaffroy P, Lajeunesse A et al (2010) Toxic effects and bioaccumulation of carbamazepine evaluated by biomarkers measured in organisms of different trophic levels. Chemosphere 80:1062–1068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.05.010
Wang X, Feng Y, Liu J et al (2010) Sequestration of CO2 discharged from anode by algal cathode in microbial carbon capture cells (MCCs). Biosens Bioelectron 25:2639–2643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2010.04.036
Xu H, Miao X, Wu Q (2006) High quality biodiesel production from a microalga Chlorella protothecoides by heterotrophic growth in fermenters. J Biotechnol 126:499–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2006.05.002
Yoo C, Jun SY, Lee JY, et al (2010) Selection of microalgae for lipid production under high levels carbon dioxide. In: Bioresource Technology. Elsevier Ltd
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Original draft preparation, Amlan Roy; conceptualization, Nirmali Gogoi, Mohammad Farooq, Amlan Roy; supervision, review and editing of the manuscript, Nirmali Gogoi, Farishta Yasmin, Mohammad Farooq.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable
Consent for publication
Not applicable
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Roy, A., Gogoi, N., Yasmin, F. et al. The use of algae for environmental sustainability: trends and future prospects. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 40373–40383 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19636-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19636-7