Introduction

Ampicillin is a β-lactam antibiotic that belongs to the penicillin family. This drug is used to treat some infections caused by bacteria, such as meningitis, infections in the lungs, blood, heart, urinary tract, and gastrointestinal tract (Katzung et al. 2013; Serna-Galvis et al. 2016a, b). Due to its broad spectrum of application, this antibiotic can be found in different sources such as hospitals, veterinary, and domestic wastewater (Kemper 2008; Kummerer 2009).

Antibiotics, in general, are very difficult to remove by conventional biological and chemical treatments. Their photoresistance and low biodegradability have made them attract the attention of the scientific community (Feng et al. 2013; Serna-Galvis et al. 2015; Sirés and Brillas 2016), which has made considerable efforts to find the right treatment to remove these emergent pollutants from wastewater. During the last 20 years, different researchers have proved that an excellent alternative to eliminate emergent and/or persistent organic pollutants is electrochemical advanced oxidation processes (EAOPs) (Masomboon et al. 2010; Salazar et al. 2011; García-Segura et al. 2017).

EAOPs are processes that use electricity to electroproduce in situ strong oxidizing agents like hydroxyl radical (·OH) (Moreira et al. 2014). ·OH has a high standard potential (E° = 2.80 V vs SHE) that makes it capable of non-selectively reacting with organics to produce hydroxylated or dehydrogenated derivatives, until their complete mineralization to CO2, water, and inorganic ions (Sales Solano et al. 2015).

Among EAOPs is electrochemical oxidation, in which pollutants are oxidized by heterogeneous M(·OH) formed from water discharge at the anode surface and at high current, as shown by Eq. (1) (García-Segura et al. 2016a, b; Pérez et al. 2017a, b).

$$ \mathrm{M}\kern0.5em +\kern0.5em {\mathrm{H}}_2\mathrm{O}\kern0.5em \to \kern0.5em \mathrm{M}\left(\bullet \mathrm{OH}\right)\kern0.5em +\kern0.5em {\mathrm{e}}^{\hbox{-}}\kern0.5em +\kern0.5em {\mathrm{H}}^{+} $$
(1)
$$ {\mathrm{O}}_2\kern0.5em +\kern0.5em 2{\mathrm{H}}^{+}\kern0.5em +\kern0.5em 2{\mathrm{e}}^{\hbox{-}}\kern0.5em \to \kern0.5em {\mathrm{H}}_2{\mathrm{O}}_2 $$
(2)

Other EAOP, which is based on Fenton reaction chemistry used for the decontamination of water, is EF. In this treatment, H2O2 is continuously electrogenerated (Eq. (2)) at a carbonaceous cathode and reacts with a small concentration of Fe2+ that is added to the solution to yield Fe3+ ion and homogeneous ·OH in the bulk ((Eq. (3)), with optimum pH 2.8 (Abdessalem et al. 2010; Annabi et al. 2016). The advantages of EF over the classical Fenton reagent treatment are the in situ generation of H2O2 and the cathodic generation of Fe2+ ion from the reduction of Fe3+ generated in the Fenton’s Eq. (4), thereby accelerating Fenton Eq. (3) and enhancing the mineralization process (de Luna et al. 2012; Olvera-Vargas et al. 2015; Pereira et al. 2016).

$$ {\mathrm{Fe}}^{2+}\kern0.5em +{\mathrm{H}}_2{\mathrm{O}}_2\kern0.5em \to \bullet \mathrm{OH}\kern0.5em +\kern0.5em {\mathrm{Fe}}^{3+}\kern0.5em +{\kern0.5em }^{\hbox{-}}\mathrm{OH} $$
(3)
$$ {\mathrm{Fe}}^{3+}\kern0.5em +\kern0.5em {\mathrm{e}}^{\hbox{-}}\kern0.5em \to \kern0.5em {\mathrm{Fe}}^{2+} $$
(4)

On the other hand, to increase the rate of degradation and mineralization of the organic compounds in solution in the EF process, it is possible to irradiate the system with a UV light (García-Segura et al. 2012; Liu et al. 2013; Bedolla-Guzmán et al. 2016). This process is known as PEF. With direct irradiation, the efficiency of the method is higher than that of EF because of (i) further regeneration of Fe2+ and production of homogeneous ·OH radicals from the photoreduction of Fe(OH)2+ (Eq. (5)) (Babuponnusami and Muthukumar 2012; García-Rodríguez et al. 2016):

$$ \mathrm{Fe}{\left(\mathrm{OH}\right)}^{2+}\kern0.5em +\kern0.5em \mathrm{hv}\kern0.5em \to {\mathrm{Fe}}^{2+}\kern0.5em +\kern0.5em \bullet \mathrm{OH} $$
(5)

(ii) photo decarboxylation of iron(III) complexes with intermediates carboxylic acids generated by the action of the hydroxyl radical on the organic pollutant, according to Eq. (6) (Anotai et al. 2011; Díez et al. 2016):

$$ \mathrm{Fe}{\left(\mathrm{OOCR}\right)}^{2+}\kern0.5em +\kern0.5em \mathrm{hv}\kern0.5em \to \kern0.5em {\mathrm{Fe}}^{2+}\kern0.5em +\kern0.5em {\mathrm{CO}}_2\kern0.5em +\kern0.5em \mathrm{R}\bullet $$
(6)

This last process may be complemented with a method that has been studied by our research group, which consists in EO-H2O2 using an anode, specifically, a boron-doped diamond (BDD) (Espinoza et al. 2016; Vidal et al. 2016). This anode interacts very weakly with physisorbed BDD(·OH) produced from Eq. (7) and promotes a much greater O2-overpotential than other conventional anodes like Pt to achieve the removal of organics (El-Ghenymy et al. 2015; Zazou et al. 2016). In this process, the organic contaminant may undergo two simultaneous oxidations: (i) oxidation from the ·OH formed in the solution according to the Fenton reaction (Eq. (3)) and (ii) oxidation by the action of ·OH surface (M) through the discharge of water according to Eq. (7) (García-Segura et al. 2013; Benito et al. 2017; Cruz-Rizo et al. 2017):

$$ \mathrm{BDD}\kern0.5em +\kern0.5em {\mathrm{H}}_2\mathrm{O}\kern0.5em \to \kern0.5em \mathrm{BDD}\left(\bullet \mathrm{OH}\right)\kern0.5em +\kern0.5em {\mathrm{e}}^{\hbox{-}}\kern0.5em +\kern0.5em {\mathrm{H}}^{+} $$
(7)

In the present study, the main objective was to compare different electrochemical advanced oxidation for the degradation, mineralization, and evaluation of the removal of the antimicrobial activity of the antibiotic ampicillin in water.

Experimental methods

Reagents

Sodium ampicillin (CAS number: 69-52-3, C16H18N3NaO4S, 99.9% of purity) was supplied by Sigma-Aldrich® and was used as received. The chemical structure and some characteristics of the antibiotic are shown in SM1. Analytical grade oxamic and malic acids were from Sigma-Aldrich®, while oxalic, maleic, formic, and acetic were from Merck®. Solutions of anhydrous sodium sulfate (used as supporting electrolyte) and iron sulfate II heptahydrate (analytical grade from Merck) were prepared with distilled water and had their pH adjusted with analytical grade sulfuric acid or sodium hydroxide (both from Merck). Hydrogen peroxide was provided by Sigma-Aldrich®. Milli-Q water, acetonitrile (Merck, HPLC grade) and methanol (J.T.BAKER, HPLC grade) were used for the preparation of the HPLC mobile phase.

Electrochemical system

Electrochemical experiments for ampicillin (AMP) degradation were carried out in a 250-mL, one-compartment electrolytic cell. Galvanostatic electrolyses were performed with an MCP model M10-QD305 power supply, which displayed the current and voltage. A carbon-PTFE air diffusion electrode was used as cathode. The preparation of the air diffusion electrode has been reported in other studies (Chávez et al. 2010). A boron-doped diamond electrode (BDD) was used as anode with a 2.75-mm thick p-doped diamond layer with a concentration of 500 ppm of boron supplied by Adamant®. Both electrodes with a geometric area of 5 cm2 and separated from each other by 1 cm. All experiments contained 0.05 M Na2SO4 as supporting electrolyte with a concentration of 1 mg L−1 of Fe2+ at pH 2.8 under constant stirring conditions. The effect of the applied current density (j) was tested at 2, 5, 20, and 50 mA cm−2 and the effect of the initial concentration of AMP in solution was studied at 10, 50, 75, and 100 mg L−1 in addition to an experiment in micromolar concentration (10 and 50 μg L−1). In PEF assays, the solution was irradiated with a fluorescent black light blue tube (λmax = 360 nm, 5.0 W m−2) placed in the center of electrochemical cell were is added the solution.

The removal of AMP was performed in a real industrial wastewater from a Slaughterhouse company located in the town of Puente Alto, Santiago of Chile. The company provides a full service to slaughterhouse and roughing of pork and beef, and treats its effluents generated from the production in accordance with Chilean standards. For these experiments, wastewater samples where collected after primary and secondary treatment of the plant (decantation, coagulation, and aerobic biological treatment), in March 20th, 2018. Two hundred fifty milliliters of industrial wastewater was spike with 50 mg L−1 of AMP and treated by PEF applying a current density of 5 mA cm−2, in the presence of 1 mg L−1 of Fe2+ and 0.05 M Na2SO4 at pH 2.8 and 30 °C.

Analysis

The pH was measured with a Hanna Instruments pH-meter model HI8424. During electrolysis, samples were withdrawn from the solution kept in the cell at regular time intervals and then refrigerated at 4 °C until performing the analytical procedures.

The degree of mineralization was monitored from total organic carbon decay (TOC), which was determined with a Shimadzu Total Organic Carbon Analyzer (TOC 5000A). From these data, the mineralization current efficiency (MCE) for each treated solution was then calculated from Eq. (8) (Coria et al. 2016; García-Segura et al. 2016a, b; Salazar et al. 2016):

$$ \mathrm{MCE}\left(\%\right)=\frac{\mathrm{n}\ \mathrm{F}\ {\mathrm{V}}_{\mathrm{s}}\Delta {\left(\mathrm{TOC}\right)}_{\mathrm{exp}}}{4.32\ \mathrm{x}\ {10}^7\ \mathrm{m}\ \mathrm{I}\ \mathrm{t}}\kern0.5em \mathrm{x}\kern0.5em 100 $$
(8)

Where n is the number of electrons consumed in the mineralization of the corresponding antibiotic AMP; F is Faraday’s constant (96487C mol−1); Vs is the solution volume (L), (TOC)exp is the experimental TOC decay (mg L−1) evaluated as the difference between the initial value and that analyzed at time t; 4.32 × 107 is a conversion factor (3600 s h−1 × 12000C mol−1); I is the applied current (A); t is the electrolysis time (hours), and m corresponds to the 16 carbon atoms present in AMP. The n values were taken according to the mineralization reactions (Eq. (9)), considering a complete mineralization to CO2, SO42−, and NO3 ions from the following reaction (96 e):

$$ {\mathrm{C}}_{16}{\mathrm{H}}_{18}{\mathrm{N}}_3{\mathrm{N}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{O}}_4\mathrm{S}+41{\mathrm{H}}_2\mathrm{O}\to 16{\mathrm{C}\mathrm{O}}_2+3{{\mathrm{N}\mathrm{O}}_3}^{\hbox{-} }+{{\mathrm{SO}}_4}^{2\hbox{-} }+{\mathrm{N}\mathrm{a}}^{+}+100{\mathrm{H}}^{+}+96{\mathrm{e}}^{\hbox{-} } $$
(9)

Aliquots were taken at different electrolysis times to evaluate the decay of the antibiotic concentration, which was analyzed by liquid chromatography in an HPLC Thermo Scientific coupled with an array detector diode Dionex Ultimate 3000, using a column Thermo Scientific Acclain C-18, 5 μm, 100 mm × 4.6 mm (id) at 25 °C ± 1°. Water/acetonitrile was used as mobile phase in a ratio of 80:20, respectively, at a flow of 0.5 mL min−1. A calibration curve with different concentrations of AMP was prepared for the determination of the concentration of the antibiotic during the electrolysis. AMP presented a chromatographic peak with a retention time (rt) of 4.2 min.

The aliphatic carboxylic acids obtained as final products were identified and quantified by ion-exclusion chromatography using a Waters 625 Chromatograph with diode array detector 2966, fitted with a Bio-Rad Aminex HPX 87H, 30 cm × 7.8 mm (i.d.), column at 30 °C, at = 210 nm. The mobile phase was 4 mM H2SO4 at 0.6 mL min−1. The corresponding calibration curves were constructed using pure acid standards. Absorption peaks with rt of 6.4 min for oxalic, 7.8 min for maleic, 9.3 min for oxamic, 13.6 min for formic, 14.8 min for acetic, and 15.3 min fumaric acid were obtained in the corresponding chromatograms. Released inorganic ions were quantified by a photometric technique. The formation of NO3 was determined with nitrate reagent HI93728-0 and the formation of NH4+ with ammonia MR reagent (2 × 20 mL) HI93715-01, both from Hanna Instruments. Both ions were measured in a Hanna Instruments HI83099 Multiparameter photometer.

Aromatic intermediates were detected by UHPLC–MS/MS Ultimate 3000. Solutions of AMP were electrolyzed at short and long electrolysis times. Then, they were mixed until 300 mL were obtained, and extracted three times with 30 mL of CH2Cl2 and ethyl acetate for each extraction, with the purpose of identifying as many reaction intermediates as possible. The collected organic solution (90 mL) was dried with anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered and completely evaporated in a rotary evaporator, and then concentrated with methanol. Liquid chromatography electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (LC-ESI–MS) was performed using a LTQ XL linear ion trap (Thermo Scientific) interfaced with a Thermo Scientific UHPLC system equipped with a quaternary pump (UltiMate 3000 High-Speed LC System). Sample separation was conducted on a Thermo Scientific MS C18 Kinetex (100 × 3 mm, 1.7 μm, 100 Å). Chromatographic analyses were carried out using isocratic elution A:B 30:70 with eluent A being formic acid (0.1% in MiliQ water) and eluent B consisting of formic acid (0.1% in MeOH J. T. Baker). The flow rate was 0.4 mL min−1 and the column temperature was maintained at 25 °C. The ESI source was set in positive ion detection mode. Full scan MS data were collected for a mass range of 100–2000 m/z.

Accumulation of H2O2 was determined by the method of formation of the ammonium metavanadate complex. An aliquot of 500 μL from the reactor was added to a plastic cell containing 500 μL of solution of ammonium metavanadate (6.2 mM). After 5 min, the absorbance at 450 nm was measured in a Genesys spectrophotometer.

Antimicrobial activity (AA) was determined by analyzing the inhibition zone in the agar diffusion test, using Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 6538 as the indicator microorganism. Twenty microliters of the sample solution was seeded on Petri dishes containing 5 mL of potato dextrose agar and 10 mL of nutrient agar inoculated with 10 μL of S. aureus (with an optical density of 0.600 at 580 nm). After 24 h at 37 °C in a Memmert (Schwabach) incubator, confluent bacterial growth was observed, and the diameter of the inhibitory halo was measured with a meter foot. All antimicrobial activity analyses were conducted at least by duplicate to ensure the reproducibility of methodology.

Results and discussion

Electrochemical degradation of AMP

A kinetic study of the degradation of the antibiotic ampicillin was carried out comparing different electrochemical advanced oxidation processes such as EO-H2O2, EF, and PEF. Moreover, photolysis process was applied to verify if UV radiation in conjunction with Fe2+ influenced in the degradation of the antibiotic. These experiments were performed under a concentration of 50 mg L−1 in 0.05 M Na2SO4 with 1 mg L−1 Fe2+ (for the EF and PEF experiments) in 0.250 L solution at pH 2.8.

Figure 1a shows the change in the concentration of AMP during the application for each process. It is possible to observe that when the system is irradiated with UV light in the presence of Fe2+ and without applying current, the concentration of AMP remains constant during 120 min of electrolysis, which means that the drug was not photolyzed. Then, removal of 68 and 73% of the antibiotic from the solution was reached through EO-H2O2 and EF after 120 min of electrolysis. However, a higher percentage of degradation (89%) was achieved with the PEF process after 120 min of electrolysis applying the same 5 mA cm−2. These results could be explained by the hydroxyl radicals generated: (i) in the surface of the BDD anode, (ii) within the solution by the Fenton reaction, and (iii) those that are induced by the photolytic action by photo-reducing and photo-decarboxylating the Fe3+ complexes (Moreira et al. 2015; Pérez et al. 2017a, b).

Fig. 1
figure 1

a Degradation of 50 mg L−1 of AMP and evolution of hydrogen peroxide applying 5 mA cm−2. Experimental conditions: 250 mL of solution containing Fe2+ [1 mg L−1] and Na2SO4 [0.05 M], at pH 2.8 and 30 °C. (■) Photolysis/Fe2 +/365 nm, (●) EO-H2O2, H2O2, (▲) EF and (▼) PEF/365 nm, H2O2. b TOC decay at the same experimental conditions

For all the electrochemical processes carried out (EO-H2O2, EF and PEF), the degradation of the AMP follow a pseudo-first-order kinetic decay (SM2). The apparent rate constants were obtained from the slopes of graph ln[AMP]0/[AMP]t. These values allowed us to affirm that the rate of degradation depends on the process, with differences of two times between EO-H2O2 and PEF processes: EO-H2O2 9.15 × 10−3 s−1 < EF 1.07 × 10−2 s−1 < PEF 1.81 × 10−2 s−1.

The percentage of mineralization of the pollutant in solution in the different electrochemical processes applied was quantified by the decay of the total organic carbon. In Fig. 1b, it was not possible to observe a mineralization by irradiating the solution with the sole action of UV light. Then, when EO-H2O2 and EF were applied, a mineralization of 32 and 43% were reached after 120 min, respectively (Fig. 1b). In contrast, when PEF was applied, a 63% TOC was removed in 120 min, evidencing the strong positive action of UV light supplied by lamp to photolyze Fe(III)-carboxylate complexes from Eq. (6), which remain in solution in EF since they are not attacked by hydroxyl radicals. According to these results, it was not possible to reach a higher percentage of mineralization applying a current density of 5 mA cm−2 in 120 min of electrolysis in PEF due to the generation of intermediates and short-chain carboxylic acids that persisted during electrolysis and reacted more slowly with the hydroxyl radical.

In the same way of both, AMP decay and TOC abatement, antimicrobial activity decreased mostly when the PEF process was applied. Figure 2 shows that, when irradiating the system with UV365nm light and in the presence of Fe2+, the antimicrobial activity persisted during 120 min, which is in agreement with the not removal of the antibiotic (Fig. 1a). However, when performing the electrochemical process, it was possible to observe that AA decreased over electrolysis time in the cases of EO-H2O2, EF, and PEF, revealing that the antibiotic had been degraded. The EO-H2O2 and EF processes presented a 30 and 60% elimination of AA after 120 min remaining in a solution of 16.1 and 13.6 mg L−1 of AMP, respectively, as showed in Fig. 1a. In contrast, by PEF process was able to remove 90% of the AA after 120 min remaining in a 5.4-mg L−1 AMP solution, as observed in Fig. 1a. Authors like Giraldo-Aguirre et al. 2015a, band Serna-Galvis et al. 2016a, b report that this elimination of antimicrobial activity is caused by the rupture of the β-lactam ring that is part of the 6-aminopenicillanic acid structure, which is essential for the biological activity of these compounds. Therefore, the intermediates that are generated during the antibiotic degradation process do not present antimicrobial activity.

Fig. 2
figure 2

AMP antimicrobial activity under the same experimental conditions of Fig. 1

Influence of current density on the degradation of AMP by photoelectro-Fenton process

The velocity of the electrochemical reactions depends mainly on the current density applied to the system, which regulates the generation of species generated at the anode and cathode. For these experiments, different current densities were applied in a range from 2 to 50 mA cm−2 to a solution of 50 mg L−1 of AMP in 0.05 M Na2SO4 at pH 2.8 and at room temperature, with a concentration of Fe2+ of 1.0 mg L−1 using photoelectro-Fenton process.

Figure 3a shows a marked dependence on the removal of TOC after the increase of current density. When a current density of 2 mA cm−2 was applied, it was possible to remove 12% of the total organic carbon present in the solution in 120 min. When the current density was increased to 5, 20, and 50 mA cm−2, 63, 78, and 86% of TOC removal was reached in 120 min, respectively. This increase in the abasement of the total organic carbon over time was mainly due to the greater amount of hydroxyl radicals formed on the surface of the BDD electrode. Similarly, the concentration of H2O2 electrogenerated at the cathode also increased and lead to an increase in the amount of hydroxyl radicals formed in the solution by the Fenton reaction.

Fig. 3
figure 3

a Effect of current density over AMP degradation and b AMP antimicrobial activity by PEF treatment. Two hundred fifty milliliters of AMP 50 mg L−1, Fe2+ [1 mg L−1], pH 2.8, 30 °C, Na2SO4 [0.05 M]: (▼) 2 mA cm−2, (▲) 5 mA cm−2, (●) 20 mA cm−2 and (■) 50 mA cm−2. Inset: Effect of current density on mineralization current efficiency in PEF treatment

Figure 3b shows the dependence between the applied current density and AA removal during electrolysis time when PEF was applied. At a low current density, 30% of AA was removed after 120 min. Furthermore, when increasing current density to 5 mA cm−2, AA decays at 120 min. Likewise, when applying a j of 20 and 50 mA cm−2, the inhibition halo disappears at 30 and 5 min of electrolysis. According to these results, the elimination of AMP was complete after applying current densities between 5 and 50 mA cm−2. Although the mineralization of AMP did not exceed 86% at high current densities as shown in Fig. 3a, these results highlight that intermediate products generated in the degradation of the antibiotic did not exhibit antimicrobial activity, because no halo of inhibition was observed until the end of the different experiments.

Based on the data shown in Fig. 3a, the mineralization current efficiency (MCE) for the degradation of AMP was determined using the PEF treatment. Insert in Fig. 3a shows that at 20 min of electrolysis, a maximum efficiency is reached with a value of 85% for 2 mA cm−2. However, this efficiency decreases considerably over time and this was reflected in the low removal of the TOC at the end of the electrolysis. Similarly, insert in Fig. 3a shows 90% efficiency was achieved at a current density of 5 mA cm−2 in 120 min of electrolysis and with a high percentage of mineralization (63%). Then, when applying a current density over 20 mA cm−2, the efficiency in current decreased notably. This happens because the activation energy of reactions occurring in parallel was exceeded, which does not favor the degradation and mineralization of organic contaminants, such as oxygen evolution by the hydroxyl radical via Eq. (10) or destruction with hydrogen peroxide and Fe2+ via Eqs. (11) and (12), respectively. Additionally, other reactions that lower the efficiency of the process, such as the production of S2O82− and ozone by Eqs. (13) and (14), might occur (Sirés et al. 2014; Moreira et al. 2017).

$$ 2\mathrm{BDD}\left(\bullet \mathrm{OH}\right)\to 2\mathrm{BDD}+{\mathrm{O}}_2+2{\mathrm{H}}^{+}+2{\mathrm{e}}^{\hbox{-} } $$
(10)
$$ {\mathrm{H}}_2{\mathrm{O}}_2+\bullet \mathrm{OH}\to {\mathrm{H}\mathrm{O}}_2\bullet +{\mathrm{H}}_2\mathrm{O} $$
(11)
$$ {\mathrm{Fe}}^{2+}+\bullet \mathrm{OH}\to {\mathrm{Fe}}^{3+}\ {+}^{\hbox{-}}\mathrm{OH} $$
(12)
$$ 2{{\mathrm{H}\mathrm{SO}}_4}^{\hbox{-}}\to {\mathrm{S}}_2{{\mathrm{O}}_8}^{2\hbox{-} }+2{\mathrm{H}}^{+}+2{\mathrm{e}}^{\hbox{-} } $$
(13)
$$ 3{\mathrm{H}}_2\mathrm{O}\to {\mathrm{O}}_3+6{\mathrm{H}}^{+}+6{\mathrm{e}}^{\hbox{-} } $$
(14)

Degradation of different initial concentrations of AMP by photoelectro-Fenton process

The oxidation capacity of the photo electro-Fenton process was studied to visualize the time needed to mineralize AMP with different levels of concentration. In the previous section, the effect of current density on the degradation of AMP in solution by means of PEF was studied. Consequently, MCE was calculated, and results showed that the highest efficiency was obtained by applying a current density of 5 mA cm−2. With the chosen current density, different solutions containing 10 to 100 mg L−1 of AMP in 0.05 M Na2SO4 with 1 mg L−1 of Fe2+ at pH 2.8 were evaluated. Figure 4a shows that at high concentrations of 100 and 75 mg L−1 of AMP, it was possible to mineralize only 30 and 29% in both cases, which could be improved by increasing electrolysis time. However, when low initial concentrations of AMP (50 and 10 mg L−1) were used, of 62 and 55% mineralization was achieved, respectively. The incomplete mineralization in some cases implies that intermediate compounds generated during the AMP degradation process are persistent at the end of the process.

Fig. 4
figure 4

a Effect of the initial AMP concentration. b AMP antimicrobial activity by PFE treatment. Two hundred fifty milliliters of AMP [50 mg L−1], Fe2+ [1 mg L−1], pH 2.8, 30 °C, Na2SO4 [0.05 M]: (■) 100 mg L−1, (●) 75 mg L−1, (▲) 50 mg L−1 and (▼) 10 mg L−1

The antimicrobial activity in solutions with different concentrations of AMP was evaluated during the process of antibiotic degradation by means of PEF (Fig. 4b). The results showed that at low initial concentrations of AMP (10 mg L−1), the antimicrobial activity was eliminated in 90 min of electrolysis; however, the percentage of mineralization was 55%, as shown in Fig. 4a, which means that intermediate products formed during antibiotic degradation but with no AA persist in solution. When initial concentrations of AMP between 50 and 100 mg L−1 were used, antimicrobial activity still persisted at 120 min of electrolysis, which could be improved by increasing electrolysis time.

According to the mineralization data displayed in Fig. 4a, MCE in AMP degradation was obtained at different initial concentrations during 120 min of electrolysis (data not shown). Two hundred eighty-one percent efficiency in antibiotic mineralization was achieved at 10 min of electrolysis, which then decreases at 120 min of experiment, a behavior that coincides with the low percentage of mineralization obtained at 2 h of electrolysis. In the same line, the efficiency obtained with an initial AMP concentration of 75 mg L−1 increases by 110% at 5 min of electrolysis, but decreases over time, remaining constant until the end of the process with a low pollutant mineralization. Nevertheless, when a solution with a concentration of 50 mg L−1 was electrolyzed, maximum efficiency was reached at 120 min, which increased in the course of electrolysis and was reflected in the high percentage of mineralization obtained at the end of the experiment. Finally, when the initial concentration of the solution was 10 mg L−1, the MCE had a 57% increase at 5 min of experiment and then decreased until 120 min of electrolysis, due to the lower amount of antibiotic in solution compared to the greater amount of oxidizing species that were generated in the process, which implies a loss in efficiency, because these oxidants can react with other species giving rise to parasite reactions (El-Ghenymy et al. 2013). Additionally, a percentage of mineralization over 50% was obtained.

On the other hand, two degradation experiments of AMP using real micro pollutant concentration (10 and 50 μg L−1) were performed in 0.05 M Na2SO4 with 1 mg L−1 of Fe2+ at pH 2.8. A total degradation and mineralization of the drug was achieved after 8–10 min of electrolysis evidencing that, by PEF process is possible to degrade AMP in concentrations at environmental level.

Intermediates and products generated during the degradation of AMP by PEF

The AMP solutions degraded through PEF by applying a current density of 5 mA cm−2 were also analyzed by ion-exclusion HPLC to qualitatively identify the short-chain carboxylic acids generated during the studied mineralization process. The chromatograms revealed peaks related to maleic, oxalic, oxamic, formic, acetic, and fumaric acids. The carboxylic acids generated during the mineralization process, such as the evolution of maleic and fumaric acid, may be a consequence of the fragmentation of the aromatic rings present in the molecule of the antibiotic (Ruiz et al. 2011; Almeida et al. 2012). These two formed acids can continue to be attacked by hydroxyl radicals, thereby evolving to simpler carboxylic acids, such as acetic, oxalic, and formic acids. Finally, the formation of oxamic acid is caused by the destruction of the molecule zones where these acids are derivatives of nitrogen. Formic acid and oxamic acid can be mineralized directly to CO2 (Thiam et al. 2015; Wang et al. 2011).

The inorganic ions produced during the degradation of AMP at 5 mA cm−2 in the PEF process were identified by photometry. When the antibiotic in solution is degraded, nitrogenous species are generated, because the antibiotic presents nitrogenous groups in its structure. The ions identified are the ammonium ion (NH4+) and the nitrate ion (NO3), being these species completely oxidized and possibly being generated in a high concentration.

Therefore, mainly nitrate ions could be generated in a greater proportion than ammonium ions by means of the oxidation of the antibiotic, whose reaction is expressed in Eq. (9).

In order to establish a possible mechanism for the degradation of the antibiotic AMP by photo electro-Fenton, we have identified the main reaction intermediates. Identification of aromatic intermediates was carried out using UHPLC-MS/MS. During antibiotic electrolysis, seven possible structures associated with oxidation compounds were detected and can be observed together with their masses in Table 1.

Table 1 Aromatics and hydroxylated derivatives identified by UHPLC–MS/MS for antibiotic ampicillin

Based on the products detected in this work, a possible mineralization pathway is shown in Fig. 5 for the degradation of the antibiotic AMP (compound 1) by PEF. The formation of aromatic compounds is attributed to successive attacks of ·OH on the antibiotic and its intermediates. In a first step, AMP generated two intermediates due to the attack of the hydroxyl radical on the amide group, dividing the molecule into two parts: compound 2, whose m/z is 151.16 and compound 4, whose m/z is 289.30. Following the first reaction pathway, compound 2 is attacked by hydroxyl radicals by breaking the bond between the C1 of benzene and its substituent, giving rise to compound 3, whose m/z is 94.11. Besides, through compound 4, compound 5, whose m/z is 232.25, is generated. Compound 5 is formed by two hydroxylations, one on the carbonyl of the amide and the other on the substituted carbon of the thiazolidine ring by a carboxylic group. As in the latter path, compound 5 is now attacked by ·OH, generating the breakdown of the betalactam ring and breaking the bond between the carbonyl and the nitrogen of the aliphatic chain, thereby forming compound 6, whose m/z is 220.24. Finally, compound 7, whose m/z is 147.19, is detected after being generated by the hydroxylation of compound 6 on the carbon double bonded to nitrogen.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Pathway proposed for the mineralization of the antibiotic ampicillin by PEF treatment

On the other hand, the rupture of aromatic rings produces higher molecular weight acids such as maleic or fumaric, and then acids of lower molecular weight. These acids are attacked by hydroxyl radicals, generating oxalic, oxamic, and formic acids, which can react with the Fe3+ in solution and form iron complexes that undergo photodecarboxylation, regenerating Fe2+ prior to the complete mineralization to CO2 and mineralization confirming inorganic ions.

Degradation of AMP in a real wastewater by PEF

The removal of AMP was performed in a real industrial wastewater from a Slaughterhouse company and the results are shown in Fig. 6. Two hundred fifty milliliters of industrial wastewater was spike with 50 mg L−1 of AMP and treated by PEF applying a current density of 5 mA cm−2, in the presence of 1 mg L−1 of Fe2+ and 0.05 M Na2SO4 at pH 2.8 and 30 °C. Almost a complete degradation of AMP was obtained after 60 min of electrolysis, evidencing that, in a complex matrix, the PEF method is effective in the elimination of this kind of pollutant. In the same way, % of removal of TOC and DQO increases with the electrolysis time, which implies that not only the degradation of AMP occurs due to the hydroxyl radicals generated during the photoelectro-Fenton process, but also those organic components present in the real sample. On the other hand, a complete elimination of the turbidity is achieved after 3 h of treatment. All these results allow to obtain a treated water that complies with Chilean standards for the elimination of industrial wastewater (DS 609, 1998).

Fig. 6
figure 6

TOC, COD, turbidity, and concentration abatement of 50 mg L−1 of AMP in a real matrix of from a Slaughterhouse Company post biological treatment by PFE. Experimental condition: 250 mL of wastewater, current density 5 mA cm−2, Fe2+ [1 mg L−1], Na2SO4 [0.05 M], pH 2.8 and 30 °C

Conclusions

It was determined that the antibiotic AMP can be degraded and mineralized by PEF using a BDD anode, air diffusion cathode, and exposing the solutions to UV365nm radiation due to hydroxyl radicals generated in the bulk, on the anode surface and UV radiation. In addition, the direct photolysis of complexes between Fe3+ and some organic intermediates led to the fastest reaction rates. Together with the degradation of AMP, the antimicrobial activity in the solution was eliminated after 120 min of electrolysis. PEF allows greater decay of the antibiotic concentration, TOC decay, complete elimination of antimicrobial activity, and process efficiency over other electrochemical processes such as EO-H2O2 and EF. The decay of the concentration of the antibiotic follows pseudo-first-order kinetics, and it is possible to reach almost total degradation of AMP in a real complex matrix of wastewater.

Finally, during the degradation of the antibiotic, aromatic compounds, carboxylic acids, and inorganic ions are produced prior to the transformation into CO2.