Abstract
Global total CO2 emission and sequestration are being analysed from 1960 to 2029 reports interpreted from DEP, DOE, IPCC, CFC, CDIAC, IEA, UNEP, NOAA, and NASA. Consequently, these reports have been transcribed into each 10-year-period data set by using MATLAB software to accurately calculate the decadal emission and sequestration rate of total CO2 within the world. Then, these data were further analysed to determine the final annual increasing rate (yr −1) of CO2 accumulation into the atmosphere. The study revealed that total CO2 emissions throughout the world since the 1960s have been increasing rapidly and in the recent year the net CO2 increasing rate is 2.11% annually. If the current annual CO2 growth rate is not copped now, the atmospheric CO2 accumulation shall indeed reach at a toxic level of 1200 ppm concentration of CO2 into the atmosphere in 53 years. Consequently, the entire human race will face severe breathing problems due to the toxic level of CO2 presence in the air which indeed will create a serious environmental vulnerability to live mankind on Earth comfortably.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Since 1960s, massive development of industrialisation and the misuse of the natural resources throughout the world quicken the accumulation of atmospheric CO2 concentration heavily which certainly will be dangerous for mankind to take fresh breath in the near future (Bauer et al., 2013; Betts et al., 2016; Davis & Caldeira, 2010). Several studies revealed that currently accumulation of CO2 into the atmosphere is 400 ppm, and it is increasing in such a rapid rate that it will reach soon at the toxic level which will result in human being to have severe respiratory problems and possibly many people throughout the world will die (Cetin & Sevik, 2016; Erb et al., 2013; Li et al., 2016). A recent study by Sert et al. (2019) and Sevik et al. (2020) revealed that air pollution has become a problem on a global scale and poses a significant risk in terms of human health and natural ecosystems. Another study by Cetin, (2016), Cetin et al., (2019) discovered that air pollution is one of the dreadful problems around the world especially in the cities, and people are getting various health problems and even thousands of people are dying every year affected by this air pollution. Recent studies by Krapivin and Varotsos (2016), Krapivin et al. (2017), and Varotsos et al. (2020) suggested that major natural and man-made climate changes will result tremendous increasing of atmospheric CO2 by 2150 which will influence on the global cycles of greenhouse gases extensively for the survival of the planet Earth. So, it is time without a doubt to make the global environment green by reducing CO2 emissions which will confirm the versatility, adaptability, and manageability of our mother Earth, which will not result in maladjustment simultaneously, but will be presentable as a sustainable world for our future generation to take a fresh breath. Thus, in the research, a detail calculation of global CO2 emission from all sources on Earth and sequestration of CO2 by all sinks on this planet have been estimated to evaluate the net increasing rate of CO2 into the atmosphere to give an advance warning to the mankind for forthcoming environmental vulnerability due to the heavy accumulation of CO2 into the atmosphere. Simply, this study will help the global scientific community, policy makers, and leaders to take this forthcoming danger seriously to mitigate global CO2 immediately to console the forthcoming deadly respiratory problem for mankind on Earth.
2 Methods and Simulation
2.1 CO 2 Emissions
The decadal increasing rate in CO2 emissions due to all industrial developments globally was estimated from the difference between consecutive decades from the period 1960s, 1970s, 1980s, 1990s, 2000s, 2010s, and 2020s, and then, it was converted into yearly growth rate divided by past year emission to the current year emissions by using the following equation:
Here, this simple calculation is being analysed to determine per year CO2 emission increasing rate. To precisely estimate the CO2 increasing rate considering each decadal period, a leap-year factor is also being applied to determine net yearly increasing rate of CO2 (EFf) by using its logarithm equal to the below equation:
Here, the net CO2 emission increasing rates have been calculated accounting multi-decadal time scales by integrating a non-linear function into \(\mathrm{ln}({E}_{\mathrm{FF}})\) in Eq. (2) to calculate eventually yearly increasing rate of CO2 into the atmosphere (Achard et al., 2014; Canadell et al., 2007; Houghton, 2007). Thus, the algorithm of EFF of this equation is being fitted into MATLAB algorithm EFF to confirm the precise increasing rate of CO2 yearly.
Similarly, the CO2 emissions calculated here (ELUC) due to the misuse of all natural resources throughout the world were calculated by implementing dynamic global environmental modelling (DGVM) simulations in MATLAB considering the difference between two consecutive decadal periods of 1960s, 1970s, 1980s, 1990s, 2000s, 2010s, and 2020s (Ballantyne et al., 2012; Morimoto et al., 2021; Stephens et al., 2007). Then, a time series is being implemented in this simulation by allocating the dynamic emission of CO2 due to the misuse of all natural resources throughout the world within two consecutive years, and then, it was converted into yearly growth rate divided by past year emission to the current year emissions by using the following equation:
Here, the equation is being calculated in yearly CO2 emissions growth rate (Earles et al., 2012; Jain et al., 2013; Stephens et al., 2007). However, to precisely determine the increasing rate of CO2 in multiple decades, a leap-year factor is also being applied to ensure the net yearly increasing rate of carbon dioxide (ELUC) which is expressed by the following equation:
Here, the CO2 emission increasing rates have been estimated corresponding to all decadal time scales by applying a non-linear function in \(\mathrm{ln}({E}_{\mathrm{LUC}})\) in Eq. (4) to determine annual CO2 emission into the atmosphere (Prietzel et al., 2016; Schwietzke et al., 2016). Thus, the algorithm of EFF is being integrated into MATLAB to confirm the precise emission rate of CO2 from misuses of all natural resources.
Finally, the global total CO2 emission from all industrial developments and misuse of natural resources per year has been calculated by combing all four equations (Eqs. 1, 2, 3, and 4) as follows:
Thereafter, the global CO2 sequestration considering (1) ocean sink and (2) terrestrial sink available throughout the world has been calculated from 1960 to 2029 by conducting a 10-year period of experiment on each data set and then converted it into the time period for an average annual rate.
2.2 CO 2 Sink
Consequently, the CO2 sequestered by the ocean is being calculated for the past years and the next years from the decadal set of 1960s, 1970s, 1980s, 1990s, 2000s, 2010s, and 2020s by implementing oceans’ carbon sink cycle models (Hossain, 2017; Liu et al., 2015). This approach is being implemented to accurately analyse the physio-biological processes of global oceans directly involved in CO2 sequestration by the ocean surfaces and its fauna (Chevallier, 2015; Hossain, 2016). Thus, the oceans’ CO2 sink is being determined accurately by dividing the individual yearly values with the previous year’s value; therefore, the oceanic CO2 sequestration per year (t) in GtC yr−1 is being calculated as follows:
Here n is the number of oceans; m is the factor involving CO2 sequestration; and t represents the period.
Then, the absorption of CO2 per year by terrestrial vegetation and the Earth is also being determined to determine the total CO2 sequestration by land (SLAND) similarly from the decadal set of 1960s, 1970s, 1980s, 1990s, 2000s, 2010s, and 2020s and convert it into annual rate. Here, the net CO2 sink by land is being calculated as follows:
Here, \({S}_{\mathrm{LAND}}\) is calculated from the remainder of the estimates where \({G}_{\mathrm{ATM}}\) is the present CO2 into the atmosphere, (\({E}_{\mathrm{FF}}\)) is the carbon from industrial development, and \({E}_{\mathrm{LUC}}\) is the CO2 from the misuse of all natural resources throughout the world (Ballantyne et al., 2012; Stephens et al., 2007).
Then, the computation of \({S}_{\mathrm{LAND}}\) in Eq. (7) is being utilised to determine ELUC by subtracting \(\left({G}_{\mathrm{ATM}}+ {S}_{\mathrm{OCEAN}}\right)\) CO2.
Subsequently, the total CO2 sequestration in a year period has been calculated by combing these two equations (Eqs. 6 and 7) as follows:
Atmospheric CO2 Concentration (GATM) Increasing Rate.
Finally, the net yearly increasing rate of the atmospheric CO2 concentration is being determined yearly from the variation of the total CO2 emission and total CO2 sequestration each year.
3 Results and Discussion
3.1 CO 2 Emission
The average global CO2 emissions from 1960 to 2029 during this time scale showed that total CO2 emissions from combined industrial development and the misuse of all natural resources throughout the world are at an annual average of 1.7 GtC yr−1 of 1.7 ± 0.7 GtC yr−1 per decade in the 1960s (1960–1969); annual average of 2.2 GtC yr−1 of 1.7 ± 0.8 GtC yr−1 per decade in the 1970s (1970–1979); annual average of 1.5 GtC yr−1 of 1.6 ± 0.8 GtC yr−1 per decade in the 1980s (1980–1989); annual average of 2.45 GtC yr−1 of 2.6 ± 0.8 GtC yr−1 per decade in the 1990s (1990–1999); annual average of 2.45 GtC yr−1 of 2.6 ± 0.8 GtC yr−1 per decade in the 2000s (2000–2009); and annual average of 3.26 GtC yr−1 of 3.26 ± 0.5 GtC yr−1 per decade in the 2010s (2010–2019) and expected to be increased to annual average of 3.26 GtC yr−1 of 3.26 ± 0.5 GtC yr−1 per decade in the 2020s (2020–2029) (Table 1).
3.2 CO 2 Sink
Subsequently, the results of CO2 sequestration by ocean and the terrestrial vegetation and land suggested that the average global CO2 sink from 1960 to 2029 during this time scale showed that total CO2 emissions from combined industrial development and the misuse of all natural resources throughout the world are at an annual average of 1.5 GtC yr−1 of 1.5 ± 0.2 GtC yr−1 per decade in the 1960s (1960–1969); annual average of 1.3 GtC yr−1 of 1.3 ± 0.5 GtC yr−1 per decade in the 1970s (1970–1979); annual average of 1.4 GtC yr−1 of 1.4 ± 0.6 GtC yr−1 per decade in the 1980s (1980–1989); annual average of 1.4 GtC yr−1 of 1.6 ± 0.4 GtC yr−1 per decade in the 1990s (1990–1999); annual average of 1.15 GtC yr−1 of 1.15 ± 0.5 GtC yr−1 per decade in the 2000s (2000–2009); and annual average of 1.15 GtC yr−1 of 1.15 ± 0.5 GtC yr−1 per decade in the 2010s (2010–2019) and expected to increase to annual average of 1.15 GtC yr−1 of 1.15 ± 0.5 GtC yr−1 per decade in the 2020s (2020–2029) (Table 1).
3.3 Atmospheric CO2 Concentration (G ATM) Increasing Rate
Then, the rate of growth of the atmospheric CO2 concentration is being calculated by comparing the decadal and individual annual values for 10 years periodical set which suggested that the average global CO2 annual growth from 1960 to 2029 is 0.2% at the decade 1960s; 0.9% at the decade 1970s; 0.1% at the decade 1980s; 1.15% at the decade 1990s; 1.3% at the decade 2000s; 2.11% at the decade 2010s; and expected to be 2.11% at the decade 2020s. The projected growth rate of atmospheric CO2 concentration presumably suggested that the increased rate of CO2 will remain the same as 2.11% per year for next several decades if we do not curb this acceleration of CO2 emissions (Table 1).
The current CO2 concentration into the atmosphere is 400 ppm and is growing at a rate of 2.11% per year; thus, the following equations confirmed that it will attain at a toxic level of 1200 ppm in 53 years.
Consequently, all human beings on earth will be in serious breathing problem due to the toxic level of CO2 into the atmosphere. Simply, it is an urgent demand to reduce the CO2 emission globally to mitigate the forthcoming deadly breading problem for mankind as well as secure a better planet for our next generation.
4 Conclusion
The total global CO2 emissions due to the industrial development and the misuse of all natural resources throughout the world estimated for the past several decades as well as total CO2 sink by ocean and land were calculated to determine the increasing rate in CO2 into the atmosphere each year. The yearly increasing rate of the atmospheric CO2 accumulation over the last several years was confirmed by simulated estimate which revealed that it is increasing at a rate of 2.11% yearly. If the current annual CO2 growth rate is not copped now, the atmospheric CO2 accumulation shall indeed reach at a toxic level of 1200 ppm in 53 years which will result in the entire human race to face severe respiratory problem throughout the world.
Data Availability
The data sets used in this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request except for data that is subject to third party restrictions.
References
Achard, F., Beuchle, R., Mayaux, P., Stibig, H.-J., Bodart, C., Brink, A., Carboni, S., Desclée, B., Donnay, F., Eva, H. D., Lupi, A., Raši, R., Seliger, R., & Simonetti, D. (2014). Determination of tropical deforestation rates and related carbon losses from 1990 to 2010. Global Change Biology, 20(8), 2540–2554. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12605
Ballantyne, A. P., Alden, C. B., Miller, J. B., Tans, P. P., & White, J. W. C. (2012). Increase in observed net carbon dioxide uptake by land and oceans during the past 50 years. Nature, 488(7409), 70–72. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11299
Bauer, J. E., Cai, W.-J., Raymond, P. A., Bianchi, T. S., Hopkinson, C. S., & Regnier, P. A. G. (2013). The changing carbon cycle of the coastal ocean. Nature, 504(7478), 61–70. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12857
Betts, R. A., Jones, C. D., Knight, J. R., Keeling, R. F., & Kennedy, J. J. (2016). El Niño and a record CO2 rise. Nature Climate Change, 6(9), 806–810. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3063
Canadell, J. G., Le Quéré, C., Raupach, M. R., Field, C. B., Buitenhuis, E. T., Ciais, P., Conway, T. J., Gillett, N. P., Houghton, R. A., & Marland, G. (2007). Contributions to accelerating atmospheric CO2 growth from economic activity, carbon intensity, and efficiency of natural sinks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(47), 18866–18870. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0702737104
Cetin, M. (2016). A change in the amount of CO2 at the center of the examination halls: Case study of Turkey. Studies on Ethno-Medicine, 10(2), 146–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/09735070.2016.11905483
Cetin, M., Onac, A. K., Sevik, H., & Sen, B. (2019). Temporal and regional change of some air pollution parameters in Bursa. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 12(3), 311–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-018-00657-6
Cetin, M., & Sevik, H. (2016). Measuring the impact of selected plants on indoor CO2 concentrations. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 25(3):973–979. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/61744
Chevallier, F. (2015). On the statistical optimality of CO2 atmospheric inversions assimilating CO2 column retrievals. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 15(19), 11133–11145. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11133-2015
Davis, S. J., & Caldeira, K. (2010). Consumption-based accounting of CO2 emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(12), 5687–5692. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0906974107
Earles, J. M., Yeh, S., & Skog, K. E. (2012). Timing of carbon emissions from global forest clearance. Nature Climate Change, 2(9), 682–685. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1535
Erb, K.-H., Kastner, T., Luyssaert, S., Houghton, R. A., Kuemmerle, T., Olofsson, P., & Haberl, H. (2013). Bias in the attribution of forest carbon sinks. Nature Climate Change, 3(10), 854–856. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2004
Hossain, M. F. (2016). Theory of global cooling. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 6(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-016-0091-y
Hossain, M. F. (2017). Green science: Independent building technology to mitigate energy, environment, and climate change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 73, 695–705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.136
Houghton, R. A. (2007). Balancing the global carbon budget. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 35(1), 313–347. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.earth.35.031306.140057
Jain, A. K., Meiyappan, P., Song, Y., & House, J. I. (2013). CO2 emissions from land-use change affected more by nitrogen cycle, than by the choice of land-cover data. Global Change Biology, 19(9), 2893–2906. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12207
Krapivin, V. F., & Varotsos, C. A. (2016). Modelling the CO2 atmosphere-ocean flux in the upwelling zones using radiative transfer tools. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 150–151, 47–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2016.10.015
Krapivin, V. F., Varotsos, C. A., & Soldatov, V. Y. (2017). Simulation results from a coupled model of carbon dioxide and methane global cycles. Ecological Modelling, 359, 69–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2017.05.023
Li, W., Ciais, P., Wang, Y., Peng, S., Broquet, G., Ballantyne, A. P., Canadell, J. G., Cooper, L., Friedlingstein, P., Le Quéré, C., Myneni, R. B., Peters, G. P., Piao, S., & Pongratz, J. (2016). Reducing uncertainties in decadal variability of the global carbon budget with multiple datasets. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(46), 13104–13108. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1603956113
Liu, Z., Guan, D., Wei, W., Davis, S. J., Ciais, P., Bai, J., Peng, S., Zhang, Q., Hubacek, K., Marland, G., Andres, R. J., Crawford-Brown, D., Lin, J., Zhao, H., Hong, C., Boden, T. A., Feng, K., Peters, G. P., Xi, F., & He, K. (2015). Reduced carbon emission estimates from fossil fuel combustion and cement production in China. Nature, 524(7565), 335–338. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14677
Morimoto, S., Goto, D., Murayama, S., Fujita, R., Tohjima, Y., Ishidoya, S., Machida, T., Inai, Y., Patra, P. K., Maksyutov, S., Ito, A., & Aoki, S. (2021). Spatio-temporal variations of the atmospheric greenhouse gases and their sources and sinks in the Arctic region. Polar Science, 27, 100553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polar.2020.100553
Prietzel, J., Zimmermann, L., Schubert, A., & Christophel, D. (2016). Organic matter losses in German Alps forest soils since the 1970s most likely caused by warming. Nature Geoscience, 9(7), 543–548. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2732
Schwietzke, S., Sherwood, O. A., Bruhwiler, L. M. P., Miller, J. B., Etiope, G., Dlugokencky, E. J., Michel, S. E., Arling, V. A., Vaughn, B. H., White, J. W. C., & Tans, P. P. (2016). Upward revision of global fossil fuel methane emissions based on isotope database. Nature, 538(7623), 88–91. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature19797
Sert, E. B., Turkmen, M., & Cetin, M. (2019). Heavy metal accumulation in rosemary leaves and stems exposed to traffic-related pollution near Adana-İskenderun Highway (Hatay, Turkey). Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 191(9), 553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7714-7
Sevik, H., Cetin, M., Ozel, H. B., Akarsu, H., & Zeren Cetin, I. (2020). Analyzing of usability of tree-rings as biomonitors for monitoring heavy metal accumulation in the atmosphere in urban area: A case study of cedar tree (Cedrus sp.). Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 192(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-8010-2
Stephens, B. B., Gurney, K. R., Tans, P. P., Sweeney, C., Peters, W., Bruhwiler, L., Ciais, P., Ramonet, M., Bousquet, P., Nakazawa, T., Aoki, S., Machida, T., Inoue, G., Vinnichenko, N., Lloyd, J., Jordan, A., Heimann, M., Shibistova, O., Langenfelds, R. L., & Denning, A. S. (2007). Weak northern and strong tropical land carbon uptake from vertical profiles of atmospheric CO2. Science, 316(5832), 1732–1735. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1137004
Varotsos, C., Mazei, Y., & Efstathiou, M. (2020). Paleoecological and recent data show a steady temporal evolution of carbon dioxide and temperature. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 11(4), 714–722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2019.12.022
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by Green Globe Technology under the grant RD-02021-03. Any findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this paper are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Green Globe Technology.
Funding
Green Globe Technology is the funding body for this research. The grant GGT RD 02–2021 is provided to conduct research in relation to global sustainability.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Md. Faruque Hossain is the sole author for the paper. He has contributed 100% for conducting research, collecting data, and writing papers.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The author declares no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hossain, M.F. Extreme Level of CO2 Accumulation into the Atmosphere Due to the Unequal Global Carbon Emission and Sequestration. Water Air Soil Pollut 233, 105 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-022-05581-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-022-05581-1