Abstract
Failure of a pipe or valve in a water distribution system causes service disruption and other inconveniences to the customers at or downstream of the failure location. To minimize the impact of such a pipe or valve failure, it is crucial to identify those pipes or valves whose failure will have the most severe consequences in degrading the performance of the system relative to that of other pipes or valves. In this paper, we develop two failure analysis methodologies, Pipe-by-Pipe and Valve-by-Valve, to prioritize the importance of pipes and valves in a water distribution system. The relative importance of individual pipes and valves is evaluated according to the number of customers who are forced out of service as a consequence of a pipe or valve failure. The methodologies are based on a segment-finding algorithm which defines a series of isolated pipes in the case of pipe or valve failure. A procedure based on the Breadth First Search is also developed to find sections of pipes that are unintentionally isolated in the isolation procedure for failed pipes. The number of unintentionally isolated customers is included in the Pipe-by-Pipe and Valve-by-Valve analyses in order to incorporate this negative effect of unintended isolation of pipes. The methodologies are applied to a case study of a water distribution system for which the most important pipe and valve are identified. The results are analyzed to form a guideline for improving the system reliability. The proposed methodologies were found to be a valuable tool for ensuring efficient operation and developing appropriate maintenance strategies, and thereby for improving the reliability of many water distribution systems.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Araujo LS, Ramos H, Coelho ST (2006) Pressure control for leakage minimisation in water distribution systems management. Water Resour Manag 20:133–149
Bouchart F, Goulter I (1991) Reliability improvements in design of water distribution networks recognizing valve location. Water Resour Res 27(12):3029–3040
Goulter I, Walski TM, Mays LW, Sakarya B, Bouchart F, Tung YK (2000) Reliability analysis for design. In: Mays LW (ed) Water distribution systems handbook. McGraw Hill, New York, NY
Hoff JW (1996) Maintenance requirements of valves in distribution systems. Annual conference proceedings AWWA, June 23–27, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Jowitt PW, Xu C (1990) Optimal valve control in water distribution networks. J Water Resour Plan Manage, ASCE, 455–472, July/August
Jowitt PW, Xu C (1993) Predicting pipe failure effects in water distribution networks. J Water Resour Plan Manage 119(1):18–31
Jun H (2005) Strategic valve locations in a water distribution system. Ph.D. Dissertation, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia
KIWA and AWWARF (2001) Key criteria for valve operation and maintenance. AWWARF and KIWA
Shea S (1991) Valve maintenance in Boston. Resources engineering and operations for the new decades. Annual Conference Proceedings, AWWA, pp 561–566
Skousen PL (1997) The valve handbook. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY
Su YC, Mays LW, Duan N, Lansey KE (1987) Reliability-based optimization model for water distribution systems. J Hydraul Eng 114(12):1539–1556, December
Walski TM (1993a) Practical aspects of providing reliability in water distribution systems. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 42:13–19
Walski TM (1993b) Water distribution valve topology for reliability analysis. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 42:21–27
Whittaker AR, Arscott AW (1997) Development of an intelligent valve key to improve identification and control of distribution system valves. Annual conference proceedings AWWA, June 15–19, Atlanta, GA
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jun, H., Loganathan, G.V., Kim, J.H. et al. Identifying Pipes and Valves of High Importance for Efficient Operation and Maintenance of Water Distribution Systems. Water Resour Manage 22, 719–736 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-007-9188-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-007-9188-6