Abstract
Hydrology filters propagule bank expression in herbaceous Carolina bays, but the strength of this filter’s effects on community composition at different points along the hydrologic gradient of these southeastern U.S. depressional wetlands is unknown. We used an experimental approach to determine the pattern of vegetation expression from propagule banks of Carolina bays exposed to different hydrologic conditions and gradients. Propagule banks of sediment cores collected from six Carolina bays were placed in bins, each of which was allocated to one of three hydrologic treatments: moist soil (MS), mid-summer drawdown (DD), or flooded (FL). After one season of vegetation development (1995) in the hydrologic treatments, half of the bins were left flat and the remaining were sloped to produce a finer moisture gradient within each bin. We compared taxa richness, community composition based on cover, and cover patterns of eight abundant species that developed in bins over the season (1996) after sloping. Species richness was significantly higher in the moist soil treatment and in sloped bins. Community composition, however, was affected by the hydrologic treatment only and not the finer-scale flooding gradient produced by sloping. Under flooded conditions, floating-leaved and submerged aquatics had higher cover; vegetation converged on simpler, less variable communities dominated by obligate wetland species, with species exhibiting different patterns of abundance over small changes in water depth. Emergent species typically had higher cover in moist soil and drawdown treatments. These results confirm a tight mechanistic link between hydrology and vegetation patterns within Carolina bays, but suggest that the strength of this link is not uniform across the gradient. The linkage weakens with drier conditions as both facultative wetland and upland species recruit into the standing vegetation.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Ahn C., White D.C., Sparks R.E. (2004). Moist-soil plants as ecohydrologic indicators for recovering the flood pulse in the Illinois River. Restoration Ecology 12:207–213
Anderson M.J. (2001a). A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Aust. Ecol. 26:32–46
Anderson M.J. (2001b). Permutation tests for univariate or multivariate analysis of variance and regression. Can. J. Fish. Aq. Sci. 58:626–639
Anderson M.J. (2003). XMATRIX: a FORTRAN computer program for calculating design matrices for terms in ANOVA designs in a linear model. Department of Statistics, University of Auckland, New Zealand
Anderson M.J. (2004a). DISTLM v.5: a FORTRAN computer program to calculate a distance-based multivariate analysis for a linear model. Department of Statistics, University of Auckland, New Zealand
Anderson M.J. (2004b). PERMDISP: a FORTRAN computer program for permutational analysis of multivariate dispersions (for any two-factor ANOVA design) using permutation tests. Department of Statistics, University of Auckland, New Zealand
Bennett S.H., Nelson J.B. (1991). Distribution and status of Carolina bays in South Carolina. South Carolina Wildlife and Marine Resources Department, Columbia, SC. Nongame and Heritage Trust Publication No. 1.
Bray J.R., Curtis J.T. (1957). An ordination of the upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin. Ecol. Mono. 27:325–349
Brinson, M. M. 1993. A hydrogeomorphic classification for wetlands. Wetlands Research Program Technical Report WRP-DE-4. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station.
Clarke K.R. (1993). Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Aust. J. Ecol. 18:117–143
Collins B.S., Battaglia L.L. (2001). Hydrology effects on propagule bank expression and vegetation in six Carolina Bays. Comm. Ecol. 2:21–33
Collins B.S., Pinder J.E.III. (1990). Spatial distribution of herbs and grasses in a South Carolina oldfield. Journal of Ecology 78:66–76
De Steven D., Toner M.M. (2004). Vegetation of upper coastal plain depression wetlands: environmental templates and wetland dynamics within a landscape framework. Wetlands 24:23–42
Euliss N.H., Mushet D.M. (1996). Water-level fluctuation in wetlands as a function of landscape condition in the prairie pothole region. Wetlands 16:587–593
Faith D.P., Minchin P.R. and Belbin L. 1987. Compositional dissimilarity as a robust measure of ecological distance. Vegetatio 69: 57–68
Gerritsen J., Greening H.S. (1989). Marsh seed banks of the Okefenokee swamp: effects of hydrologic regime and nutrients. Ecol. 70:750--763
Grace J.B., Wetzel R.G. (1981). Phenotypic and genetic components of growth and reproduction in Typha latifolia: experimental studies in marshes of differing successional maturity. Ecol. 62:789–801
Keddy P.A. (2000). Wetland Ecology - Principles and Conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Keddy P.A., Reznicek A.A. (1986). Great Lakes vegetation dynamics: the role of fluctuating water levels and buried seeds. J. Great Lakes Res. 12:25–36
Kirkman L.K., Sharitz R.R. (1994). Vegetation disturbance and maintenance of diversity in intermittently flooded Carolina bays in South Carolina. Ecol. Appl. 4:177–188
Kirkman L.K., Lide R.F., Wein G.R., Sharitz R.R. (1996). Vegetation changes and land-use legacies of depression wetlands of the western coastal plain of South Carolina: 1951–1992. Wetlands 16:564–576
Kirkman L.K., Golladay S.W., Laclaire L., Sutter R. (1999). Biodiversity in southeastern, seasonally ponded, isolated wetlands: management and policy perspectives for research and conservation. J. North Am. Benth. Soc. 18:553–562
Kozlowski T.A. (2002). Physiological-ecological impacts of flooding on riparian forest ecosystems. Wetlands 22:550–561
Leck M.A. (1996). Germination of macrophytes from a Delaware River tidal freshwater wetland. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 123:48–67
Legendre P., Anderson M.J. (1999). Distance-based redundancy analysis: testing multispecies responses in multifactorial ecological experiments. Ecological Monographs 69:1–24
Lide R.F., Meentemeyer V.G., Pinder J.E., Beatty L.M. (1995). Hydrology of a Carolina Bay located on the upper Coastal-Plain of western South Carolina. Wetlands 15:47–57
McArdle B.H., Anderson M.J. (2001). Fitting multivariate models to community data: a comment on distance-based redundancy analysis. Ecology 82:290–297
Minchin P.R. 1987. An evaluation of the relative robustness of techniques for ecological ordination. Vegetatio 69: 89--107
Minchin P.R. (1989). DECODA user’s manual. Research School of Pacific Studies. Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
Poiani K.A., Dixon P.M. (1995). Seed banks of Carolina bays: potential contributions from surrounding landscape vegetation. Am. Midl. Nat. 134:140–154
Radford A.E., Ahles H.E., Bell C.R. (1968). Manual of the vascular flora of the Carolinas. The University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC
Richardson C.J., Gibbons J.W. (1993). Pocosins, Carolina bays, and mountain bogs. In: Martin W.H., Boyce S.G., Echternacht A.C. (eds), Biodiversity of the Southeastern United States: lowland terrestrial communities. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, pp. 257--310
Sandercock G. 1997. Evaluating Data Standardisation in Vegetation Analysis Using Simulated Data. Honours thesis, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
Schalles J.F., Shure D.J. (1989). Hydrology, community structure, and productivity patterns of a dystrophic Carolina bay wetland. Ecol. Mono. 59:365–385
Seabloom E.W., van der Valk A.G., Moloney K.A. (1998). The role of water depth and soil temperature in determining initial composition of prairie wetland coenoclines. Plant Ecology 138:203–216
Sharitz R.R. (2003). Carolina bay wetlands: unique habitats of the southeastern United States. Wetlands 23:550–562
Sharitz R.R., Gibbons J.W. (1982). The ecology of southeastern shrub bog (pocosins) and Carolina bays: a community profile. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Biological Services Program, Washington, DC. FWS/OBS-82/04
Sharitz R.R., Gresham C.A. (1998). Pocosins and Carolina Bays. In: Messina M.G., Conner W.H. (eds), Southern Forested Wetlands Ecology and Management. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, pp. 343–378
Taylor B.E., Leeper D.A., McClure M.A., DeBiase A.E. (1999). Carolina bays: ecology of aquatic invertebrates and perspectives on conservation. In: Batzer D.P., Rader R., Wissinger S.A. (eds), Invertebrates in Freshwater Wetlands of North America: Ecology and Management. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, pp. 167–196
Tyndall R.W., McCarthy K.A., Ludwig J.C., Rome A. (1990). Vegetation of six Carolina bays in Maryland. Castanea 55:1–21
van der Valk A.G. (1981). Succession in wetlands: a Gleasonian approach. Ecol. 62:688–696
Vivian-Smith G. (1997). Microtopographic heterogeneity and floristic diversity in experimental wetland communities. J. Ecol. 85:71–82
Zampella R.A., Laidig K.J. (2003). Functional equivalency of natural and excavated Coastal Plain ponds. Wetlands 83:860–876
Zedler P.H. (2003). Vernal pools and the concept of isolated wetlands. Wetlands 23:597–607
Acknowledgements
This research was partially funded by a grant from the SREL Set-Aside program. Additional funding was by Financial Assistance Award Number␣DE-FC09-96SR18546 between the U.S. Department of␣Energy and the University of Georgia. We thank␣Peter Minchin for assistance with the distance-based MANOVA. Also, we acknowledge Emily Cantonwine for field help and Pamela Weisenhorn for assistance with figures.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Battaglia, L., Collins, B. Linking hydroperiod and vegetation response in Carolina bay wetlands. Plant Ecol 184, 173–185 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-005-9062-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-005-9062-7