Introduction

Since the effect of Honda–Fujishima on the photocatalysis of TiO2 was discovered [1], different kind of semiconductor photocatalysts have been extensively studied by many researchers [27]. In particular, TiO2 is interesting as photocatalyst, photoinduced super-hydrophilic materials, while tungsten trioxide (WO3) as photo-anode, electro- or photo- chromic materials and photocatalyst [814]. In recent years, a considerable attention has been paid to photo-electrochemical properties of the WO3/TiO2 double layers, such as photocatalysis, photochromism, and photo-rechargeable battery [1520]. Under the band gap excitation of WO3 and/or TiO2 layers by themselves, photoinduced electrons transfer to the conduction band of WO3 layers, while holes transfer to the valence band of TiO2 layers. So that, they play a significant role in maximizing the photocurrent generation efficiency to promote charge separation by accumulating electrons and holes in two different semiconductor layers with suppression of charge recombination.

Our present study deals with electrochemically assisted photocatalysis of hybrid WO3/TiO2 film electrodes with different loadings of WO3. Special attention has been focused on effect of the band structures of an amorphous-like WO3 or a polycrystalline WO3 coupled with TiO2, on the charge separation behavior under UV-irradiation.

Experimental Details

Film Preparation

TiO2 (anatase structure) and tungstic acid (H2WO4) were purchased from Kanto Chemicals, and ammonium tungstate, (NH4)10W12O41·5H2O was purchased from Kishida Chemicals. Four different types of WO3-based solid films were prepared by the following procedures: (1) WO3/TiO2 samples with different WO3 loadings were prepared by an impregnation of an aqueous solution of ammonium tungstate into TiO2. The obtained powder was mixed with triethyleneglycol to form slurry, and it was spread on a conductive indium tin oxide glass (ITO, 10 Ω/square) by squidgie method, followed by thermal treatment at 773 K for 15 min in air, and labeled as x-WO3/TiO2 (x represents weight percent of WO3); (2) A polycrystalline WO3 material was prepared by thermal decomposition of ammonium tungstate at 873 K for 6 h in air. The polycrystalline WO3 powder was treated in the same manner on an ITO glass, followed by thermal treatment in air at 773 K for 15 min, and labeled as c-WO3; 3) A physically mixed powder (40 wt.% as WO3) containing both 0.6 g of TiO2 and 0.4 g of c-WO3 was treated in the same manner on an ITO glass, followed by thermal treatment in air at 773 K for 15 min, and labeled as 40c-WO3/TiO2; 4) The tungstic acid was also treated in the same manner on an ITO glass, followed by thermal treatment at 573 K for 15 min in air, and labeled as a-WO3. The mass of each film was adjusted to be about 1.5 mg cm−2 on an ITO glass unless the mass of film was especially mentioned.

Film Characterization

Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) images were taken at 20 kV accelerating voltage in a JEOL JSM-840A. Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) images were obtained in a Shimadzu SPM-9500J by tapping mode using an etched silicon tip. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were obtained with a RIGAKU RINT2000 using Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5417 Å) in a scan range of 20–40° and a scan speed of 2° min−1. The UV–Vis spectroscopic measurements in diffuse reflectance mode were carried out using a Shimadzu UV–Vis recording spectrophotometer, UV-2200A. The collected data were transformed using the Kubelka–Munk function.

Photoelectrochemical Measurements

Photoelectrochemical measurements were carried out by a Potentiostat/Galvanostat (HABF 5001, HOKUTO DENKO) in a standard two-compartment cell in which three electrodes were connected by the bridge as shown in Fig. 1. The I−V characteristics of film electrodes were obtained at the potential sweep rate of 10 mV s−1. Black light of the fluorescent lamp (0.53 mW·cm−2 at 365 nm) was used for photoirradiation of the films. The electrolyte solution was used for 0.5 M Na2SO4 aqueous solution involving 0.5 M HCOOH. Also, the pH of aqueous solutions was adjusted by aqueous solutions of H2SO4 or NaOH. They were bubbled with N2 gas for 30 min under vigorous stirring before use. The products after photoreaction were analyzed by gas chromatography equipped with a thermal conductivity detector (TCD) for the analysis of CO2.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Schematic diagram of two-compartment cell employed in electrochemically assisted photocatalysis. (CE: Pt wire, RE: Ag/AgCl electrode, WE: film electrode)

Results and Discussion

SEM and AFM images from top views of a 40-WO3/TiO2 film was observed as shown in Fig. 2. The film was seen to form the secondary particle having porous surface by an aggregation of the primary particles from the SEM image. Electrolyte solutions involving formic acid can be easily penetrated into the porous film, which is expected to exhibit high photocatalytic activity. The AFM image of 40-WO3/TiO2 shows that this film consists of secondary particles (about 300–1,000 nm in diameter) that are in contact with each other.

Fig. 2
figure 2

SEM and AFM micrographs from top views of 40-WO3/TiO2 (a and b)

Figure 3 shows X-ray diffraction patterns of WO3/TiO2 films with different loadings of WO3. Structural change of WO3 was observed to transform from an amorphous-like structure to a polycrystalline structure as an increase of WO3 on TiO2, that is, 20- and 40-WO3/TiO2 involve an amorphous-like WO3 phase, whose diffraction pattern is similar with that of a-WO3, while 60-WO3/TiO2 and 40c-WO3/TiO2 involve a polycrystalline WO3 as a major phase [20]. Here, an amorphous-like WO3 structure can be defined to be as the intermediate between an amorphous WO3 and a polycrystalline WO3.

Fig. 3
figure 3

XRD patterns of TiO2 (a), 20-, 40-, 60-WO3/TiO2 (bd), 40c-WO3/TiO2 (e), c-WO3 (f) and a-WO3 (g) (*: WO3; #: anatase TiO2)

The photocurrent responses as a function of applied potentials (I−V characteristics) for film electrodes under photoirradiation and in dark are shown in Fig. 4. Firstly, the saturated photocurrent was obtained at +1.0 V vs. Ag/AgCl. Secondly, a flatband potential of the film was defined to be as a zero photocurrent potential, i.e., the photocurrent can be seen at more anodic potential, while no more effect of electrochemical intercalations of protons are observed at more cathodic than the flatband potential.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Dependence of the photocurrent as a function of applied voltage (IV characteristics) under UV-irradiation (up) and in dark (down): TiO2 (a), 40-WO3/TiO2 (b), c-WO3 (c) and a-WO3 (d). The pH of an aqueous solution was adjusted at 2.1

Influence of film thickness on the saturated photocurrent at +1.0 V versus Ag/AgCl is shown in Fig. 5. The photocurrent for each film electrodes was saturated at more than 1.5 mg cm−2 of film mass. Given the condition of the saturated photocurrent of the film electrodes, it was found that (1) the photocurrent efficiency depend on loadings of WO3 on TiO2, and was maximized at 40 wt.% WO3 and then decreased at loadings higher than 60 wt.%; (2) 40c-WO3/TiO2 exhibits lower photocurrent efficiency than either WO3 or TiO2 by themselves as shown in Fig. 6.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Dependence of the saturated photocurrent density as a function of mass of films for TiO2 (a), 40-WO3/TiO2 (b), and c-WO3 (c). The pH of an aqueous solution was adjusted at 2.1

Fig. 6
figure 6

Yields of CO2 photo-formed with (gray bar) and without (white bar) potential bias at +1.0 V versus Ag/AgCl, and saturated photocurrent density (black circle). The pH of an aqueous solution was adjusted at 2.1

Figure 6 also shows the yields of CO2 for the photocatalytic decomposition of formic acid under UV-irradiation with or without potential bias at +1.0 V versus Ag/AgCl. With no bias, all of the hybrid WO3/TiO2 film electrodes exhibit lower photocatalytic activity than either TiO2 or WO3 by themselves. On the other hand, under potential at +1.0 V versus Ag/AgCl, UV-irradiation of hybrid WO3/TiO2 film electrodes show higher photocatalytic activity than either TiO2 or WO3 by themselves, while it was found to be maximized at 60 wt.% WO3 and then decreased at loadings higher than 40 wt.%, which corresponds with the efficiency of the saturated photocurrent. In fact, this profile can be explained by the transformation from an amorphous-like WO3 (at ∼40 wt.%) to a polycrystalline WO3 structure (60∼ wt.%) as evidenced by the XRD data as shown in Fig. 3. Furthermore, 40c-WO3/TiO2 was seen to exhibit lower efficiency for the electrochemically assisted photocatalysis than 40-WO3/TiO2. These results indicate that the hybrid WO3/TiO2 film having an amorphous-like WO3 can play an important role in more effective charge separation than the film having a polycrystalline WO3 on photo-electrochemical cells.

Figure 7 shows the potential shifts of photocharge under UV-irradiation, and discharge under dark condition. Photocharged potentials were saturated at around −0.49 V for TiO2, −0.29 V for 40-WO3/TiO2, +0.03 V for a-WO3 and +0.03 V for c-WO3 versus Ag/AgCl, respectively, under UV-irradiation for 60 min, while 40-WO3/TiO2 and a-WO3 exhibit blue coloration. When light is turned off, both of TiO2 and c-WO3 exhibit rapid self-discharge and/or discharge, while photocharged 40-WO3/TiO2 and a-WO3 exhibit a typical Faradic discharge behavior (bleaching color) by galvanostatic discharge at the rate of 10 μA cm−2. Photocharge and discharge processes are associated with intercalation of protons into WO3 to form tungsten bronze (H x WO3) and deintercalation of protons, respectively, accordingly to the following process of (1) [17, 19, 21].

$$ {\text{WO}}_{3} + xe^{ - } + x{\text{H}}^{ + } \underset{{{\text{discharge}}}}{\overset{{{\text{photocharge}}}}{\rightleftarrows}}{\text{H}}_{x} {\text{WO}}_{3} $$
(1)
Fig. 7
figure 7

Changes in potential by photocharge for 60 min, and subsequently galvanostatic discharge at 10 μA·cm−2 on TiO2 (a), 40-WO3/TiO2 (b), c-WO3 (c) and a-WO3 (d). The pH of an aqueous solution was adjusted at 2.1

Moreover, XRD data clearly indicate that tungsten bronze (H x WO3) (x: 0.23 or 0.33) is formed through the intercalation of protons depending on the photocharged potentials. The reason for the suppression of the photo-reactivity of the hybrid WO3/TiO2 films under no bias can be explained by the formation of tungsten bronze.

Figure 8 shows the linear correlation between the pH of aqueous solutions and the flatband potentials (U fb) on TiO2, 40-WO3/TiO2 and WO3 film electrodes. The flatband potentials of TiO2 and WO3 film electrodes follow the theoretical equation of (2) through (de)protonation on the surface. The E 0 and pH in the equation of (2) represent the flatband potential at pH = 0 and the pH of aqueous solutions, respectively. Such phenomena were also observed in a hybrid WO3/TiO2 film electrode, suggesting that it also gives a property of metal-oxide semiconductor such as WO3 and TiO2.

$$ U_{{{\text{fb}}}} \, = \,E^{0} - 0.059{\text{ pH}} $$
(2)
Fig. 8
figure 8

Dependence of the pH of aqueous solutions on the flatband potentials for TiO2 (a), 40-WO3/TiO2 (b), c-WO3 (c) and a-WO3 (d)

The flatband potentials of WO3 coupled with TiO2 depend on the loadings of WO3 on TiO2, and they shift towards the positive potential from −0.54 V to +0.07 V as an increase of loadings of WO3 as shown in Fig. 9.

Fig. 9
figure 9

Dependence of the flat band potentials as a function of loadings of WO3 on TiO2. White circle shows the flatband potential of a-WO3. The pH of an aqueous solution was adjusted at 2.1

As shown in Fig. 10, it was observed that the photocurrent efficiency for the film electrodes is not influenced by the pH of aqueous solutions.

Fig. 10
figure 10

Dependence of the pH of aqueous solutions on the saturated photocurrent density for TiO2 (a), 40-WO3/TiO2 (b), c-WO3 (c) and a-WO3 (d)

The bandgap energy of TiO2 was determined to be E g = 3.40 eV by threshold against energy (hv) as shown in Fig. 11 [I]. Likewise, the band gaps of 40-WO3/TiO2, a-WO3 and c-WO3 were estimated to be E g = 3.35 eV for 40-WO3/TiO2, E g = 3.35 eV for a-WO3 and E g = 2.75 eV for c-WO3, respectively (cf. Fig. 11 [II]) [20]. It is reported that amorphous WO3 shows larger band-gap energy (3.35 eV) than polycrystalline WO3 (2.5–2.8 eV) as shown in the reference [13]. The similar phenomena can be also observed in the case of amorphous silicon (1.8 eV) compared with polycrystalline silicon (1.1 eV) [22]. It can be assumed that band-gap widening may be possibly explained by structural fluctuation of amorphous WO3 or Si. On the other hand, amorphous-like WO3 can be observed on hybrid WO3/TiO2 in the low loadings of WO3, which cause the band-gap widening of WO3. Thus, the band-gap widening of amorphous-like WO3 may be possibly explained by (i) structural fluctuation or (ii) high dispersibility of WO3 particles on TiO2 surface.

Fig. 11
figure 11

An estimation of the bandgap of TiO2 [I], and absorption spectra of TiO2 (a), 40-WO3/TiO2 (b), c-WO3 (c) and a-WO3 (d) [II]

Taking the results of flatband potentials and band gaps into consideration, the energy band structure for an amorphous-like WO3 coupled with TiO2 (a-WO3/TiO2) is proposed in Fig. 12. As a whole, the photo-induced holes and electrons on the films participate in the oxidation and the reduction of substrates, respectively. In our system, the electrons go through outer electric circuit towards counter electrode under potential bias, probably causing the reduction of oxygen. The photo-induced electrons and holes effectively transfer to the conduction band of WO3, and to the valence band of TiO2, respectively, by accumulating electrons and holes in two different semiconductor mixture layers. In general, the formate anion (HCOO) can be oxidized by a hole to form HCOO·, followed by automatic oxidation to CO2, H+ and e- from the simple occurrence of the photocurrent doubling [10]. So that, it can be supposed that one photon gives the photoreaction of HCOOH → CO2 + 2H+ + 2e. It can be assumed that photoirradiation of a-WO3/TiO2 gives more effective charge separation (h +···e -) than a polycrystalline WO3 coupled with TiO2 (c-WO3/TiO2), since the potential of valence band of a-WO3 is more anodic than that of c-WO3.

Fig. 12
figure 12

Schematic energy diagram for the photo-induced charge transfer on the a-WO3/TiO2 film electrode. The pH of an aqueous solution was adjusted at 2.1

Conclusions

A hybrid WO3/TiO2 film electrode was shown to perform more effective electrochemically assisted photocatalysis (photocurrent efficiency) than either TiO2 or WO3 by themselves due to the effective charge separation. In particular, the hybrid WO3/TiO2 film having an amorphous-like WO3 can play an important role in more effective charge separation than the film having a polycrystalline WO3.