Abstract
Artemisia annua L. is known for its capacity to synthesize artemisinin, a sesquiterpene used as an antimalarial drug. Suspension cell lines have been obtained from this species, but successful genetic transformation of these cell lines has not been reported yet. We established an A. annua cell line, AaSA, derived from leaf tissues. Genetic transformation was tested using two different Agrobacterium tumefaciens strains bearing a binary plasmid with the neomycin phosphotransferase II as a selectable marker as well as the β-glucoronidase (GUS) reporter gene. Upon selection on kanamycin, stable transgenic calli were obtained and shown to express GUS activity. We also tested whether the AaSA line could be used for transient expression analysis. Both A. tumefaciens strains were tested and in both cases, transient expression of GUS was observed after 4–6 days of co-cultivation. This opens the way for metabolic engineering of A. annua cells.
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Artemisia annua has been of interest in recent decades because it synthesizes the sesquiterpene lactone artemisinin, a potent antimalarial drug. Artemisinin is produced and stored in the glandular trichomes that cover the aerial parts of the plant (Duke et al. 1994; Olsson et al. 2009). The artemisinin production achieved by the plant is very low. This plant has therefore been largely studied to elucidate the artemisinin biosynthetic pathway and to improve the artemisinin yields.
Artemisinin production in A. annua cells and tissue cultures was investigated by several authors (Paniego and Giulietti 1994; Baldi and Dixit 2008; Caretto et al. 2011; Durante et al. 2011; Fulzele et al. 1991; Heng et al. 2013; Jin and Keng 2013; Wang et al. 2009; Yann et al. 2012). They succeeded in obtaining cell lines which produced small amounts of artemisinin. Despite efforts to improve their artemisinin production, the yields were not relevant for industrial purposes. Nevertheless, those approaches identified chemicals and molecular factors that could have a role in artemisinin biosynthesis. Genetic transformation of A. annua suspension cells would be a convenient tool to screen for genes influencing artemisinin biosynthesis and a good alternative to A. annua plant transformation which is a long and difficult task (Liu et al. 2010).
To our knowledge, the genetic transformation of A. annua suspension cells has not yet been investigated. We therefore examined the possibility of stable and transient genetic transformation of A. annua suspension cells using a reporter gene. For this purpose, our first aim consisted of establishing an A. annua cell culture. A. annua callus induction was performed according to Caretto et al. (2011). Leaf explants from young shoots grown in vitro were placed on solid MSc medium [4.33 g l−1 Murashige and Skoog, 3 % (w/v) sucrose, 2 mg l−1 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D), 0.15 mg l−1 6-benzyl amino purine (BAP), and 1 % (w/v) agarose]. After 2 weeks, small calli appeared. Calli were subcultured on fresh medium after 6 weeks. After duplication, they were cultured either in light [16 h light (50 µmol m−2 s−1), 24 °C] or in dark conditions. No callus was able to grow under dark conditions. Friable calli growing in the light were transferred to liquid medium. For calli that were able to grow in liquid medium, we tested four different media: MS ½, MS, MSa, and B5 (Table 1). The best growth rate was obtained for the MSa medium, which allowed for the subculture of calli every 2 weeks compared to every 4 weeks for the other media tested. During successive subculturing, some of the cell lines were gradually lost due to too slow growth. Cell cultures were diluted every 2 weeks by transferring 10 ml from the old culture into 40 ml of MSa medium. One cell line, AaSA, which formed small cell aggregates, was selected for further study. Figure 1 shows a growth curve of this line.
We investigated the capacity of the AaSA cells to be genetically transformed using two A. tumefaciens strains: LBA4404virG (van der Fits et al. 2000) and AGL1 (Lazo et al. 1991). Both were transformed with the binary vector pPZP-RCS2-En2pPMA4-GusVenus-tNOS-nptII which contains, between the T-DNA right and left borders, the expression cassette of the GUS-VENUS hybrid reporter and the marker gene nptII, conferring resistance to kanamycin (Navarre et al. 2010).
Cells of zero- (just after subculturing), 4-, 6- or 8-day-old cultures of A. annua AaSA were washed in MSa# medium (MSa medium supplemented with 10 mM glucose, pH 5.3) and resuspended in MSa# medium supplemented with 50 µM acetosyringone. In the meantime, A. tumefaciens strains were grown for 16 h at 28 °C in 10 ml 2YT (1.6 % (w/v) tryptone, 1 % (w/v) yeast extract, 0.5 % (w/v) NaCl). For the LBA4404 strain, 40 mg l−1 gentamycin, 20 mg l−1 rifampicine and, for plasmid selection, 100 mg l−1 spectinomycin were added. For the AGL1 strain, 40 mg l−1 carbenicillin and, for plasmid selection, 100 mg l−1 spectinomycin were added. A volume of the culture corresponding to an OD600 of 1 in 1 ml was centrifuged, and the cells were resuspended in 1 ml of MSa#. The duration of the co-cultivation of A. annua and A. tumefaciens cells was fixed to 48 h under light and agitation conditions. Both the LBA4404virG and AGL1 A. tumefaciens strains were tested. To assess the optimal cell culture age, we made the hypothesis that the appropriate conditions for transient expression would be convenient for stable transformation. We therefore performed a GUS assay after 48 h of co-cultivation. Cultures at days 6 and 8 after subculturing showed the highest GUS-staining for both A. tumefaciens strains (Fig. 2).
For stable transformation, 4 ml of 8-days-old A. annua AaSA suspension were mixed with 0, 50, 100, 200, or 300 µl of the A. tumefaciens LBA4404virG suspension in 6-well plates (Greiner) and co-cultured for 2 h at 25 °C in light conditions without agitation followed by 48 h with agitation. The cells were then centrifuged and washed twice with MSa, then washed with MSa CCK20 (MSa medium containing 20 µg ml−1 kanamycin, 500 µg ml−1 cefotaxin, and 400 µg ml−1 carbenicillin). The cells were allowed to sediment and were resuspended in 2 ml of MSa CCK20 and spread on solid MSa CCK20 (0.8 % (w/v) agar). The plates were incubated at 24 °C in light conditions. After 25 days, growing calli were transferred twice, at 3-week intervals, on MSa CCK20 and then on MSa K20 (MSa containing 20 µg ml−1 kanamycin). An example of growing calli is shown in Fig. 3a. Finally, calli were transferred to liquid MSa K20 for expression screening. All transformed calli tested showed GUS activity (Fig. 3b). GUS expression was unchanged after 16 transfers (8 months) to a fresh medium, indicating that the transformants were stable.
Transient expression upon transformation by A. tumefaciens depends on the T-DNA copies transferred to the plant cell nucleus but not yet integrated into the genome. Transient expression has the major advantage of being fast since no selection of transformed calli is necessary. In addition, transient expression might give higher expression than that seen during stable transformation, especially if the expressed gene affects cell growth and survival. Since GUS activity was detected prior to growing cells on selective medium (Fig. 2), we decided to optimize the protocol for transient gene expression. 4 ml of A. annua 8-days-old AaSA culture were co-cultured with 50, 100, or 150 µl of the A. tumefaciens AGL1 suspension, or, 200 or 300 µl of the A. tumefaciens LBA4404virG suspension in 6-well plates (Greiner). Co-cultures were incubated in light conditions at 25 °C for 2 h without agitation followed by 4–8 days of incubation with agitation. A GUS staining assay was performed on each co-culture (Fig. 4). The AGLI line showed the highest staining after 4 days of co-cultivation while this stage was delayed to the sixth day for LBA4404virG.
In this report, we demonstrated the possibility of stable and transient genetic transformation of A. annua suspension cells mediated by A. tumefaciens infection. The AGL1 and LBA4404virG strains were both able to transfer their T-DNA to A. annua cells. Since our purpose was to demonstrate that genetic transformation was possible, we did not perform metabolic analyses to determine whether AaSA cells synthetize artemisinin precursors. If this was the case, molecular biology tools could be used to obtain a better understanding of the metabolic pathway leading to the synthesis and transport of artemisinin and eventually for metabolic engineering. If it turns out that the AaSA line is not appropriate for this purpose, one could shift to other lines, which have already been shown to be active in the artemisinin pathway, either constitutively or after induction. Indeed, since we did not encounter any major problems with the line tested, it can be expected that other A. annua lines would be prone to be transformed as well.
References
Baldi A, Dixit VK (2008) Yield enhancement strategies for artemisinin production by suspension cultures of Artemisia annua. Bioresour Technol 99:4609–4614
Caretto S, Quarta A, Durante M, Nisi R, De Paolis A, Blando F, Mita G (2011) Methyl jasmonate and miconazole differently affect arteminisin production and gene expression in Artemisia annua suspension cultures. Plant Biol 13:51–58
Duke MV, Paul RN, Elsohly HN, Sturtz G, Duke SO (1994) Localization of artemisinin and artemisitene in foliar tissues of glanded and glandless biotypes of Artemisia annua L. Int J Plant Sci 155:365–372
Durante M, Caretto S, Quarta A, De Paolis A, Nisi R, Mita G (2011) β-Cyclodextrins enhance artemisinin production in Artemisia annua suspension cell cultures. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 90:1905–1913
Fulzele DP, Sipahimalani AT, Heber MR (1991) Tissue cultures of Artemisia annua: organogenesis and artemisinin production. Phytother Res 5:149–153
Heng KW, Chan DJC, Chan LK (2013) Production of cell biomass and artemisinin via batch cell culture of Artemisia annua. Adv Environ Biol 7:3737–3742
Jin CS, Keng CL (2013) Factors affecting the selection of callus cell lines and the preparation of the cell suspension culture of Artemisia annua L. Plant Tissue Cult Biotech 23:157–163
Kiah Yann L, Jelodar NB, Lai-Keng C (2012) Investigation on the effect of subculture frequency and inoculum size on the artemisinin content in a cell suspension culture of Artemisia annua L. Aust J Crop Sci 6:801–807
Lazo GR, Stein PA, Ludwig RA (1991) A DNA transformation—competent Arabidopsis genomic library in Agrobacterium. Bio/Technology 9:963–967
Liu B, Wang H, Du Z, Li G, Ye H (2010) Metabolic engineering of artemisinin biosynthesis in Artemisia annua L. Plant Cell Rep 30:689–694
Navarre C, Sallets A, Gauthy E, Maîtrejean M, Magy B, Nader J, Pety de Thozée C, Crouzet J, Batoko H, Boutry M (2010) Isolation of heat shock-induced Nicotiana tabacum transcription promoters and their potential as a tool for plant research and biotechnology. Transgenic Res 20:799–810
Olsson ME, Olofsson LM, Lindahl A-L, Lundgren A, Brodelius M, Brodelius PE (2009) Localization of enzymes of artemisinin biosynthesis to the apical cells of glandular secretory trichomes of Artemisia annua L. Phytochemistry 70:1123–1128
Paniego NB, Giulietti AM (1994) Artemisia annua L.: dedifferentiated and differentiated cultures. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 36:163–168
Van der Fits L, Deakin EA, Hoge JHC, Memelink J (2000) The ternary transformation system: constitutive virG on a compatible plasmid dramatically increases Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation. Plant Mol Biol 43:495–502
Wang JW, Zheng LP, Zhang B, Zou T (2009) Stimulation of artemisinin synthesis by combined cerebroside and nitric oxide elicitation in Artemisia annua hairy roots. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 85:285–292
Acknowledgments
This work was partially supported by the Belgian National Fund for Scientific Research, and the Interuniversity Poles of Attraction Program (Belgian State, Scientific, Technical and Cultural Services).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sallets, A., Delimoy, A. & Boutry, M. Stable and transient transformation of Artemisia annua suspension cells. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 120, 797–801 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-014-0631-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-014-0631-0