Abstract
There has recently been some literature on the properties of a Health-Related Social Welfare Function (HRSWF). The aim of this article is to contribute to the analysis of the different properties of a HRSWF, paying particular attention to the monotonicity principle. For monotonicity to be fulfilled, any increase in individual health—other things equal—should result in an increase in social welfare. We elicit public preferences concerning trade-offs between the total level of health (concern for efficiency) and its distribution (concern for equality), under different hypothetical scenarios through face-to-face interviews. Of key interests are: the distinction between non-monotonic preferences and Rawlsian preferences; symmetry of HRSWF; and the extent of inequality neutral preferences. The results indicate strong support for non-monotonic preferences, over Rawlsian preferences. Furthermore, the majority of those surveyed had preferences that were consistent with a symmetric and inequality averse HRSWF.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Abásolo I., Tsuchiya A. (2004) Exploring social welfare functions and violation of monotonicity: an example from inequalities in health. Journal of Health Economics 23(2): 313–329
Abásolo I., Tsuchiya A. (2008) Understanding preference for egalitarian policies in health: Are age and sex determinants?. Applied Economics 40(19): 2451–2461
Dolan P. (1998) The measurement of individual utility and social welfare. Journal of Health Economics 17: 39–52
Dolan P., Tsuchiya A. (2005) Health priorities and public preferences: The relative importance of past health experience and future health prospects. Journal of Health Economics 24: 703–714
Dolan P., Tsuchiya A. (2011) Determining the parameters in a social welfare functions using stated preference data: An application to health. Applied Economics 43(18): 2241–2250
Dutta I. (2006a) Health inequality and non-monotonicity of the health related social welfare function. Journal of Health Economics 26: 414–421
Dutta I. (2006b) Health inequality and non-monotonicity of the health related social welfare function: A rejoinder. Journal of Health Economics 26: 426–429
Krosnik J.A. (1999) Survey research. Annual Review of Psychology 50: 537–567
Olsen J.A. (2004) Exploring social welfare functions and violation of monotonicity: an example from inequalities in health—a comment. Journal of Health Economics 23: 331–332
Rohatgi V.K. (1976) An introduction to probability theory and mathematical statistics. Wiley, New York
Scripture E.W. (1897) The New Psychology. W Scott, London
Shaw, R., Dolan, P., Tsuchiya, A., Williams, A., Smith, P., & Burrows, R. (2001). Development of a questionnaire to elicit people’s preferences regarding health inequalities, Occasional Paper. Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
Tversky A., Kahneman D. (1991) Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. Quarterly Journal of Economics 106(4): 1039–1061
Wagstaff, A. (1994). QALYs and the equity–efficiency trade-off. In A. Layard & S. Glaister (Eds.), Cost-benefit analysis (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (reprinted from Journal of Health Economics 10 (1991) 21–41, with corrections).
Williams A. (1997) Intergenerational equity: An exploration of the fair innings argument. Health Economics 6: 117–132
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Abásolo, I., Tsuchiya, A. Is more health always better for society? Exploring public preferences that violate monotonicity. Theory Decis 74, 539–563 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-011-9292-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-011-9292-1