Abstract
For decisions whose consequences accrue over time, there are several possible techniques to compute total utility. One is to discount utilities of future consequences at some appropriate rate. The second is to discount per-period certainty equivalents. And the third is to compute net present values (NPVs) of various possible streams and to then apply the utility function to these net present values. We find that the best approach is to first compute NPVs of various possible income streams and then take the utility of such NPVs. We show the drawbacks of other alternative models of evaluating income streams. The article discusses the advantages of the power and logarithmic forms in the modeling of time preference. These are the only forms for which utility of income and utility of consumption are strategically equivalent. Further, these forms permit the flexibility in the choice of a time period (e.g., monthly or quarterly) without modifying the utility function, thus simplifying analysis.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Aczél J. (1966), Lectures on Functional Equations and Their Applications. Academic Press, New York
Baucells M., Sarin R. (2007), Satiation in discounted utility. Operations Research 55(1): 170–181
Bell D.E. (1974), Evaluating time streams of income, Omega. The International Journal of Management Science 2(5): 691–699
Brealey R., Myers S. (1991), Principles of Corporate Finance, 4 edn, McGraw Hill.
Clemen R. (1996), Making Hard Decisions: An Introduction to Decision Analysis. Duxbury Press, Boston
Dyer J.S., Sarin R.K. (1982), Relative risk aversion. Management Science 28(8): 875–886
Gollier C. (2004), The Economics of Risk and Time. The MIT Press, Cambridge Massachusetts
Grinblatt M., Titman S. (1998), Financial Markets and Corporate Strategy, Irwin McGraw Hill
Keeney R., Raiffa H. (1976), Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preference and Value Tradeoffs, John Wiley.
Koopmans T.C. (1960), Stationary Ordinal Utility and Impatience. Econometrica 28(2): 287–309
Koopmans T.C., Diamond P.A., Williamson R.E. (1964), Stationary utility and time perspective. Econometrica 32(1–2): 82–100
Matheson J. and Abbas A. (2006), Utility transeversality: A value-based approach (forthcoming), Journal of Multicriteria Decision Analysis.
Mossin J. (1968), Optimal multiperiod portfolio policies. Journal of Business 41, 215–229
Smith J. (1998), Evaluating income streams: a decision analysis approach. Management Science 44(12): 1690–1708
Thaler R.H. (1981), Some empirical-evidence on dynamic inconsistency. Economics Letters 8(3): 201–207
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Baucells, M., Sarin, R.K. Evaluating Time Streams of Income: Discounting What?. Theor Decis 63, 95–120 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-007-9045-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-007-9045-3