Abstract
Radical ontic structural realism (ROSR) claims that structure exists independently of objects that may instantiate it. Critics of ROSR contend that this claim is conceptually incoherent, insofar as, (i) it entails there can be relations without relata, and (ii) there is a conceptual dependence between relations and relata. In this essay I suggest that (ii) is motivated by a set-theoretic formulation of structure, and that adopting a category-theoretic formulation may provide ROSR with more support. In particular, I consider how a category-theoretic formulation of structure can be developed that denies (ii), and can be made to do work in the context of formulating theories in physics.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Ainsworth P. (2010) What is ontic structural realism? Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 41: 50–57
Awodey S. (2010) Category theory (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press, Oxford
Baez J. (2006) Quantum quandries: A category-theoretic perspective. In: Rickles D., French S., Saatsi J. (eds) Structural foundations of quantum gravity. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp 240–265
Bell, J. (1988). Toposes and local set theories, Dover Edition (2007).
Belot, G. (preprint). Background independence. http://sitemaker.umich.edu/belot/background-independence.
Chakravartty A. (2003) The structuralist conception of objects. Philosophy of Science 70: 867–878
Dorato M. (2008) Is structural spacetime realism relationism in disguise? The supererogatory nature of the substantivalism/relationism debate. In: Dieks D. (ed.) The ontology of spacetime. Elsevier Press, Amsterdam, pp 17–37
Döring A., Isham C. (2011) “What is a thing?”: Topos theory in the foundations of physics. In: Coecke R. (ed.) New structures for physics. Springer, New York, pp 753–937
Earman J. (1995) Bangs, crunches, whimpers, and shrieks: Singularities and acausalities in relativistic spacetimes. Oxford University Press, New York
Esfeld M., Lam V. (2008) Moderate structural realism about spacetime. Synthese 160: 27–46
French S. (2010) The interdependence of structure, objects and dependence. Synthese 175: 89–109
French S., Ladyman J. (2003) Remodeling structural realism: Quantum physics and the metaphysics of structure. Synthese 136: 31–56
Geroch R. (1972) Einstein algebras. Communications in Mathematical Physics 26: 271–275
Greaves, H. (2009). In search of spacetime structuralism. Preprint. http://users.ox.ac.uk/~mert2255.
Heller M., Sasin W. (1995) Structured spaces and their application to relativistic physics. Journal of Mathematical Physics 36: 3644–3662
Heunen C., Landsman N., Spitters B. (2009) A topos for algebraic quantum theory. Communications in Mathematical Physics 291: 63–110
Isham C., Butterfield J. (2000) Some possible roles for topos theory in quantum theory and quantum gravity. Foundations of Physics 30: 1707–1735
Jones R. (1991) Realism about what? Philosophy of Science 58: 185–202
Jozsa R. (1984) Sheaf models and massless fields. International Journal of Theoretical Physics 23: 67–97
Kraus D. (2005) Structures and structural realism. Logic Journal of the IGPL 13: 113–126
Lawvere W., Shanuel S. (1997) Conceptual mathematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Mac Lane S., Moerdijk I. (1992) Sheaves in geometry and logic. Springer, Berlin
Pedroso M. (2009) On three arguments against categorical structuralism. Synthese 170: 21–31
Pooley O. (2006) Points, particles, and structural realism. In: Rickles D., French S., Saatsi J. (eds) The structural foundations of quantum gravity. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp 83–120
Stachel J. (2006) Structure, individuality, and quantum gravity. In: Rickles D., French S., Saatsi J. (eds) The structural foundations of quantum gravity. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 53–82
Wüthrich C. (2009) Challenging the spacetime structuralist. Philosophy of Science 76: 1039–1051
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bain, J. Category-theoretic structure and radical ontic structural realism. Synthese 190, 1621–1635 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-011-9896-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-011-9896-6