Abstract
This article describes abductions as special patterns of inference to the best explanation whose structure determines a particularly promising abductive conjecture (conclusion) and thus serves as an abductive search strategy (Sect. 1). A classification of different patterns of abduction is provided which intends to be as complete as possible (Sect. 2). An important distinction is that between selective abductions, which choose an optimal candidate from given multitude of possible explanations (Sects. 3–4), and creative abductions, which introduce new theoretical models or concepts (Sects. 5–7). While selective abduction has dominated the literature, creative abductions are rarely discussed, although they are essential in science. The article introduces several kinds of creative abductions, such as theoretical model abduction, common cause abduction and statistical factor analysis, and illustrates them by various real case examples. It is suggested to demarcate scientifically fruitful abductions from purely speculative abductions by the criterion of causal unification (Sect. 7.1).
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Aliseda A. (2006). Abductive reasoning. Dordrecht, Springer
Armstrong D.M. (1983). What is a law of nature?. Cambridge, Cambridge Univ. Press
Armstrong D.M. (1969). Dispositions as causes. Analysis 30, 23–26
Barnes E. (1995). Inference to the loveliest explanation. Synthese 103, 251–277
Bortz, J. (1985). Lehrbuch der Statistik. Berlin: Springer [6th ed. 2005].
Bratko I. (1986). Prolog programming for artificial intelligence. Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley Publ. Comp
Buchanan B., et al. (1969). Heuristic dendral. Machine Intelligence 4, 209–254
Carnap R. (1956). The methodological character of theoretical concepts. In: Feigl H., Scriven M. (eds) Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science, Vol. I. Minneapolis, Univ. of Minnesota Press, pp. 38–76
Chisholm, R. M. (1966). Theory of knowledge. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall [3rd ed. 1988].
Console L., et al. (1991). On the relationship between abduction and deduction. Journal of Logic and Computation 1, 661–690
De Regt H.W. (2006). Wesley Salmon’s complementarity thesis: Causality and Unificationism Reconciled?. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 20, 129–147
Davidson D. (1984). Inquiries into truth and interpretation. Oxford, Oxford Univ. Press
Day T., Kincaid H. (1994). Putting inference to the best explanation in its place. Synthese 98, 271–295
Ducasse J. (1974). A critical examination of the belief in a life after death. Springfield, Charles and Thomas
Earman J. (1986). A primer on determinism. Dordrecht, Reidel
Earman J. (1992). Bayes or bust?. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press
Flach P., Kakas A. (eds) (2000). Abduction and induction. Dordrecht, Kluwer
Fumerton R.A. (1980). Induction and reasoning to the best explanation. Philosophy of Science 47, 589–600
Gabbay D., Woods J. (2005). The reach of abduction: Insight and trial. A practical logic of cognitive systems, Vol 2. Amsterdam, North-Holland
Gemes K. (1993). Hypothetico-deductivism, content, and the natural axiomatization of theories. Philosophy of Science 54, 477–487
Gentner D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science 7, 155–170
Glymour C. (1981). Theory and evidence. Princeton, Princeton Univ. Press
Glymour C., Spirtes P., Scheines R. (1991). Causal inference. Erkenntnis 35, 151–189
Grice, H. P. (1991). Logic and conversation. In S. Davis (Ed.), Pragmatics: A reader (pp. 305–315). New York: Oxford Univ. Press [2nd print].
Haig B. (2005). Exploratory factor analysis, theory generation, and scientific method. Multivariate Behavioral Research 40, 303–329
Halonen I., Hintikka J. (2005). Towards a theory of the process of explanation. Synthese 143, 5–61
Hanson N.R. (1961). Is there a logic of discovery?. In: Feigl H., Maxwell G. (eds) Current issues in the philosophy of science. New York, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, pp. 20–35
Harman G.H. (1965). The inference to the best explanation. Philosophical Review 74, 173–228
Hintikka J. (1998). What is abduction? The fundamental problem of contemporary epistemology. Transactions of the Charles Sanders Peirce Society 34, 503–533
Hintikka J., Halonen I., Mutanen A. (1999). Interrogative logic as a general theory of reasoning. In: Hintikka J. (eds) Inquiry as inquiry. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 47–90
Hobbs J.R., et al. (1993). Interpretation as abduction. Artificial Intelligence Journal 63, 69–142
Holyak K., Thagard P. (1989). Analogical mapping by constraint satisfaction. Cognitive Science 13, 295–355
Howson C. (2000). Hume’s problem: Induction and the justification of belief. Oxford, Clarendon Press
Howson C., Urbach P. (1996). Scientific reasoning: The Bayesian approach (2nd ed). Chicago, Open Court
Josephson J., Josephson S. (eds) (1994). Abductive inference. New York, Cambridge Univ. Press
Kitcher P. (1981). Explanatory unification. Philosophy of Science 48, 507–531
Kline P. (1994). An easy guide to factor analysis. London, Routledge
Kuhn T.S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, Chicago Univ. Press
Kuipers T.A.F. (2000). From instrumentalism to constructive realism. Dordrecht, Kluwer
Kuipers T.A.F. (2004). Inference to the best theory, rather than inference to the best explanation. In: Stadler F. (eds) Induction and deduction in the sciences. Dordrecht, Kluwer, pp. 25–51
Ladyman J. (2002). Understanding philosophy of science. London, Routledge
Lakatos I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In: Lakatos I., Musgrave A. (eds) Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge, Cambridge Univ. Press, pp. 91–195
Langley P., et al. (1987). Scientific discovery. Computational explorations of the creative process. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press
Lipton P. (1991). Inference to the best explanation. London, Routledge
Magnani L. (2001). Abduction, reason, and science. Dordrecht, Kluwer
Mill J.St. (1865). System of logic (6th ed). London, Parker, Son, and Bourn
Molnar G. (1999). Are dispositions reducible?. Philosophical Quarterly 49, 1–19
Moser P.K. (1989). Knowledge and evidence. Cambridge, Cambridge Univ. Press
Mumford S. (1998). Dispositions. Oxford, Oxford Univ. Press
Niiniluoto I. (1999). Defending abduction. Philosophy of Science (Proceedings) 66, S436–S451
Octoby D.W., et al. (1999). Modern chemistry. Orlando, Saunders College Publ
Otte R. (1981). A critique of Suppes’ theory of probabilistic causality. Synthese 48, 167–189
Pap A. (1978). Disposition concepts and extensional logic. In: Tuomela R. (eds) Dispositions. Dordrecht, Reidel, pp. 27–54
Paul G. (1993). Approaches to abductive reasoning. Artificial Intelligence Review 7, 109–152
Pearl J. (2000). Causality. Cambridge, Cambridge Univ. Press
Peirce, C. S. (1878). Deduction, induction, and hypothesis. In Peirce (CP) 2.619–2.644.
Peirce, C. S. (1903). Lectures on pragmatism. In Peirce (CP) 5.14–5.212.
Peirce, C. S. (CP). In C. Hartshorne P. Weiss (Eds.), Collected papers (pp. 1931–1935). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
Pollock J. (1986). Contemporary theories of knowledge. Maryland, Rowman & Littlefied
Prior E.W., Pargetter R., Jackson F. (1982). Three theses about dispositions. American Philosophical Quarterly 19, 251–257
Quine W.v.O. (1974). Roots of reference. Open Court, La Salle
Reichenbach H. (1956). The direction of time. Berkeley, Univ. of California Press
Ridley M. (1993). Evolution. Oxford, Blackwell Scientific Publications
Rock I. (1984). Perception. New York, Scientific American Books
Russell S.J., Norvig P. (eds) (1995). Artificial intelligence. Englewood-Cliffs, Prentice Hall
Salmon W. (1984). Scientific explanation and the causal structure of the world. Princeton, Princeton Univ. Press
Schurz G. (1991). Relevant deduction. Erkenntnis 35, 391–437
Schurz G. (1996). The role of negation in non-monotonic logic. In: Wansing H. (eds) Negation. Berlin, W. de Gruyter, pp. 197–231
Schurz G. (2001). What is ‘normal’? An evolution-theoretic foundation of normic laws. Philosophy of Science 28, 476–497
Schurz G., Lambert K. (1994). Outline of a theory of scientific understanding. Synthese 101/1: 65–120
Sebeok, T. A., & Umiker-Sebeok, J. (1980). `You know my method’. A juxtaposition of Charles S. Peirce and Sherlock Holmes. Bloomington, IN: Gaslight Publ.
Shelley C. (1996). Visual abductive reasoning in archaeology. Philosophy of Science 63, 278–301
Sober E. (1993). Philosophy of biology. Boulder, Westview Press
Sperber D., et al. (eds) (1995). Causal cognition. Oxford, Clarendon Press
Swinburne, R. (1979). The existence of God. Oxford: Clarendon Press [revised 2nd ed. 2004].
Thagard P. (1988). Computational philosophy of science. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press
Thagard P. (1992). Conceptual revolution. Princeton, Princeton Univ. Press
Van Fraassen, B. (1980). The scientific image. Oxford: Clarendon Press [reprint 1990].
Walton D. (2004). Abductive reasoning. Tuscaloosa, Univ. of Alabama Press
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schurz, G. Patterns of abduction. Synthese 164, 201–234 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-007-9223-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-007-9223-4