Abstract
This paper discusses whether Local Monotonicity (LM) should be regarded as a property of the power distribution of a specific voting game under consideration, indicated by a power measure, or as a characteristic of power per se. The latter would require reasonable power measures to satisfy a corresponding LM axiom. The former suggests that measures which do not allow for a violation of LM fail to account for dimensions of power which can cause nonmonotonicity in voting weight. Only if a measure is able to indicate nonmonotonicity, it can help design voting games for which power turns out to be monotonic. The argument is discussed in the light of recent extensions of traditional power indices.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Allingham, M.G. (1975). Economic power and values of games, Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie (Journal of Economics) 35: 293–299.
Alonso-Meijide, J.M. & C. Bowles (2003). Power indices restricted by a priori unions can be easily computed and are useful: A generating function-based application to the IMF. Discussion Paper.
Barry, B. (1980). Is it better to be powerful or lucky: Part I and Part II, Political Studies 28: 183–194, 338–352.
Baldwin, R.E., Berglöf, E., Giavazzi, F. & Widgrén, M. (2001). Nice try: Should the Treaty of Nice be ratified? Monitoring European Integration 11, London: Center for Economic Policy Research.
Braham, M. & Holler, M.J. (2003). The impossibility of a preference-based power index. Forthcoming in: Journal of Theoretical Politics.
Braham, M. & Steffen, F. (2002). Local monotonicity and Straffin’s partial homogeneity approach to the measurement of voting power. Institute of SocioEconomics. University of Hamburg, manuscript.
Brams, S.J. & Fishburn, P.C. (1995). When is size a liability? Bargaining power in minimal winning coalitions, Journal of Theoretical Politics 7: 301–316.
Brueckner, M. (2001). Extended probabilistic characterization of power. In M.J. Holler and G. Owen (eds.), Power indices and coalition formation. Boston, Dordrecht and London: Kluwer.
Caplow, T. (1968). Two Against One: Coalitions in Triads. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
Deegan, Jr., J. & Packel, E.W. (1978). A new index of power for simple n-Person games, International Journal of Game Theory 7: 113–123.
Dubey, P. & Shapley, L. (1979). Mathematical properties of the Banzhaf power index, Mathematics of Operations Research 4: 99–131.
Felsenthal, D. & Machover, M. (1995). Postulates and paradoxes of relative voting power - A critical review, Theory and Decision 38: 195–229.
Felsenthal, D. & Machover, M. (1998). The measurement of boting power. Theory and practice, problems and paradoxes. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Felsenthal, D.S. & Machover, M. (2001). The treaty of Nice and qualified majority voting, Social Choice and Welfare 18: 431–464.
Fischer, D. & Schotter, A. (1980). The Inevitability of the paradox of redistribution in the allocation of voting weights, Public Choice 33: 49–67.
Freixas, J. & Gambarelli, G. (1997). Common internal properties among power indices, Control and Cybernetics 26: 591–603.
Holler, M.J. (ed.) (1982a). Power, voting, and voting power. Würzburg and Vienna: Physica-Verlag.
Holler, M.J. (1982b). Forming coalitions and measuring voting power, Political Studies 30: 262–271.
Holler, M.J. (1997). Power monotonicity and expectations, Control and Cybernetics 26, 605–607.
Holler, M.J. (1998). Two stories, one power index, Journal of Theoretical Politics 10: 179–190.
Holler, M.J. & Packel, E.W. (1983). Power, luck and the right index, Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie (Journal of Economics) 43: 21–29.
Holler, M.J. & Widgrén, M. (1999). Why power indices for assessing EU decision making? Journal of Theoretical Politics 11: 291–308.
Holler, M.J., Ono, R. & and Steffen, F. (2001). Constrained monotonicity and the measurement of power, Theory and Decision 50: 385–397.
Holler, M.J. & Owen, G. (eds.) (2001). Power indices and coalition formation. Boston, Dordrecht and London: Kluwer.
Isbell, J.R. (1958). A class of simple games, Duke Mathematics Journal 25: 423–439.
Laruelle, A. & Valenciano, F. (2002). Assessment of Voting Situations: The Probabilistic Foundations. Discussion Paper 26/2002, Departamento de Economía Aplicada IV, Basque Country University, Bilbao, Spain.
Leech, D. (2002). Designing the voting system for the council of the European Union, Public Choice, forthcoming.
Myerson, R.B. (1999). Nash equilibrium and the history of economic theory, Journal of Economic Literature 37, 1067–1082.
Napel, S. & Widgrén, M. (2001). Inferior players in simple games, International Journal of Game Theory 30: 209–220.
Napel, S. & Widgrën, M. (2002). Strategic power revisited. CESifo Working Paper No. 736, Munich, 2002.
Napel, S. & Widgrén, M. (2004). Power measurement as sensitivity analysis - A unified approach. Forthcoming in: Journal of Theoretical Politics.
Nurmi, H. (2000). Game theoretical approaches to the EU institutions: An overview and evaluation, Homo Oeconomicus 16: 363–391.
Owen, G. (1972). Multilinear extensions of games, Management Science 18: 64–79.
Owen, G. (1977). Values of games with a priori unions, pp. 76–88 in R. Henn and O. Moeschlin (eds.), Essays in mathematical economics and game theory. Berlin and New York: Springer-Verlag.
Owen G. (1982). Modification of the Banzhaf-Coleman index for games with a priori unions, in M.J. Holler (ed.), Power, voting, and voting power, Würzburg and Wien: Physica-Verlag.
Stenlund, H., Lane, J.-E. & Bjurulf, B. (1985). Formal and real voting power, European Journal of Political Economy 1: 59–75.
Straffin, Jr., P.D. (1977). Homogeneity, independence, and power indices, Public Choice 30: 107–118.
Widgrén, M. (2001). On the probabilistic relationship between public good index and normalized Banzhaf index, pp. 127–142 in M.J. Holler and G. Owen (eds.), Power indices and coalition formation. Boston, Dordrecht and London: Kluwer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Holler, M.J., Napel, S. Local monotonicity of power: Axiom or just a property?. Qual Quant 38, 637–647 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-005-4755-5
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-005-4755-5