Background
Invasive plant species pose a global threat because they alter ecosystem functioning and biodiversity. The majority of plants form mutualistic mycorrhizal associations with mycorrhizal fungi, which contribute to the nutrient and water supply as well as diversity, competitive ability, and ecosystem productivity. In addition, the role of mycorrhizal interactions in plant invasiveness and the susceptibility or resistance of a habitat to invasion is increasingly recognized. However, the mechanisms by which mycorrhizae contribute to invasion remain unresolved.
Scope
Here, we provide an overview of the empirical evidence and discuss the prospects for mycorrhizaemediated plant invasion. Overall, mycorrhizal fungi appear to have impacts on plant invasion that depend on the similarities between the mycorrhizal associations of the alien and native plants. We introduce plant mycorrhizal niche space (PMNS) as a plant’s ability to exploit and shape the mycorrhizal fungi pool of a habitat based on its dependency on mycorrhizal fungi, traits and priority effects.
Conclusions
Collectively, the available evidence supports the idea that PMNS is independent of place of origin (invasive status). Understanding the drivers of the PMNS of both native and alien plant species may help to predict the potential invasiveness of plants and the invasibility of a habitat, to elucidate the role of the mycorrhizal fungal community in plant invasion and the impact of plant invasion on the structure of the mycorrhizal fungal community in new habitats (i.e., neighbour effect) and to improve restoration planning. In this regard, we highlight a number of knowledge gaps and discuss future research directions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The spread of invasive plants - plants that spread vigorously outside of their native ranges - is rapidly increasing as a result of increased climate change-associated disturbances and human activities, posing a global threat by shifting plant species community composition and ecosystem functioning (Castro-Díez et al. 2016; Aerts et al. 2017) and reducing the species richness of native plants and animals (Vilà et al. 2015) with potential economic losses (Pimentel et al. 2005). It is thus important to determine the relative importance of factors facilitating or inhibiting plant invasion in order to improve management practices.
The performance of plants outside their native ranges at least partly depends on their association with symbiotic microbes. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) are an ecologically and economically important fungal guild that establishes mutualistic associations with approximately 71% of vascular plant species (Cosme et al. 2018). Recent evidence suggests that mycorrhizal symbiosis with AMF mediates the competitiveness, diversity and community structure of plant species (Lin et al. 2015; Bennett et al. 2017; Teste et al. 2017), thus contributing to plant invasion success/failure (Gerz et al. 2018). Recent gene-based identification studies of fungi support the hypothesis that AMF abundance and composition may affect plant survival, establishment and invasion in a new habitat (Yang et al. 2014), depending on plant mycorrhizal dependency (i.e., mycorrhizal traits) (Neuenkamp et al. 2018), phenological and functional traits (Lin et al. 2015), invasive status and legacy effects (Jordan et al. 2012). A meta-analysis of 304 studies demonstrated that functional groups and life histories of plant species differentially altered the effects of AMF on the competition and structure of the plant communities (Lin et al. 2015). Dassen et al. (2017) showed that AMF community composition in bulk soils was significantly influenced by plant species diversity and functional groups (such as grasses, legumes, small herbs and tall herbs). By analysing the occupied range of 266 invasive plants across Germany in relation to combinations of their mycorrhizal status and plant traits using a generalized linear model, Menzel et al. (2017) demonstrated that mycorrhizal traits are significantly correlated with the geographic expansion of alien plants, such that mycorrhizal alien plants can expand across a larger range compared to non-mycorrhizal (NM) plants. In addition, there is evidence that the identity of AMF taxa can affect the coexistence and competitiveness of plants (Zhou et al. (2018). Studies on other organisms also support the idea that plant diversity and invasion success may be influenced by symbiotic relationships (Traveset and Richardson 2014; Pauw 2013). For example, plants with similar floral traits share similar flower visitors, resulting in higher competition between native and invasive plant species. This finding was also supported by Gibson et al. (2012), who reported that floral traits have indirect impacts on pollinator-mediated plant invasion and that the similarity of floral traits explains the invasion impact of Acacia saligna on the co-occurring native species.
However, several studies have reported contrasting results regarding the effects of mycorrhizal fungi on plant invasion, from finding significant (Busby et al. 2013) to negligible (Rodríguez-Caballero et al. 2018) effects. Furthermore, there have been different observations regarding the mycorrhizal status of invasive plants and their potential invasiveness. For instance, Menzel et al. (2017) showed that mycorrhizal invasive plants can outcompete NM invasive plants, whereas NM plant species comprise a greater proportion of invasive plants globally (Pringle et al. 2009). The relationship between mycorrhizae and plant invasion has been the subject of two review articles. Pringle et al. (2009) provided a framework based on the mycorrhizal status of invasive plants and the distribution and availability of mycorrhizae in novel habitats (biogeography and dispersal). The framework facilitates the prediction of invasiveness of an alien plant species based on whether the alien plant is NM, facultative, and flexible, i.e., able to associate with local mycorrhizal fungi in new habitats. In their review, Shah et al. (2009) highlighted the impact of the mycorrhizal status of invasive plants on the nutrient competition between native and invasive plants and the feedback between invasive plants and mycorrhizal fungi. These reviews and most of the research studies focused on the place of origin (invasive status) of plants and mycorrhizal status of invasive plants to explain the mycorrhizae-mediated plant invasion. We argue that these factors may not be sufficient to explain the potential invasiveness of a plant species and that other drivers may also be at play. Here, we aim to address this by focusing on research on how plant invasion is mediated by the plant mycorrhizal niche space (PMNS) of both native and invasive species, defined as their potential to exploit and shape the mycorrhizal fungi pool of a habitat depending on their dependence on mycorrhizal fungi, traits, place of origin (invasive status) and priority effects. Based on their PMNS, we can classify plant species into different groups according to their mycorrhizal association similarities. This classification could be useful for a) predicting the potential invasiveness of each plant in a particular habitat, b) predicting plant invasion impacts on the mycorrhizal communities in a new habitat, and c) enhancing our knowledge in order to restore invaded areas. In addition, we explained the role of plant response to mycorrhizal communities in plant invasion using PMNS. We conclude that a better understanding of the factors driving the mycorrhizal niche of plants will inform ecologists about the magnitude and direction of the role of mycorrhizal fungi in plant invasion trajectories as well as the impact of plant invasion on the structure of soil fungal communities in new habitats.
Mycorrhizal association traits
Depending on their ability to grow with or without mycorrhizal association, plants range from flexible to inflexible (Moora 2014). Flexible plants, such as facultative mycorrhizal (FM) can grow in various environmental conditions with a wide range of mycorrhizal fungi, whereas inflexible plants such as obligate mycorrhizal (OM) and non-mycorrhizal (NM) plants fail to do so (Moora 2014). Facultative mycorrhizal plants do not strictly need mycorrhizal fungi to meet their nutrient requirements and can regulate their traits with mycorrhizal fungi according to local environmental conditions (Moora 2014). The flexibility of this type of mycorrhizal relationship enables facultative mycorrhizal plants to reduce their mycorrhizal dependency (plant control over mycorrhizal colonization) when the costs of carbon allocation outweigh the benefits of the symbiosis (Friede et al. 2016) or when AMF diversity is low (for instance, after a major soil disturbance) (Traveset and Richardson 2014). As a result, the strength of the association between plant and AMF community compositions depends on the mycorrhizal traits of the plant community (Neuenkamp et al. 2018), which may have important consequences for the invasion potential of plants.
A number of studies have compared the performance of mycorrhizal and NM alien plants. Despite having no association with AMF, NM invasive plants can spread outside their native ranges by disrupting AMF associations in the roots of native plants and soils (Zubek et al. 2016; Tanner and Gange 2013; Pakpour and Klironomos 2015). Degradation of AMF mutualisms may lead to lower nutrient uptake, lower fitness, and physiological activity (Hale et al. 2016), thus reducing the competitiveness of local plants against alien plants. Using simulation models, McCary et al. (2019) examined the mechanism of mycorrhizal mutualism disruption in a native plant to understand the processes leading to the invasion success of NM plants (Alliaria petiolata) over native species (Impatiens capensis). They found that mycorrhizal fungal colonization declines with the increasing population size of the invasive plant and corroborated that the disruption of native mycorrhizal associations depends on the strength of the mutualism with the native plant such that intermediate mutualism shows higher resistance against invasion, while weak and strong mutualisms were susceptible. This study supports the idea that the mycorrhizal traits of native species could also play a role in plant invasion success. Moreover, the reduction in AMF density in the soil results in long-term negative legacy effects such as impaired ecosystem functions of AMF, facilitation of further plant invasions and greater resistance to the restoration of native plant species even after removal of invasive plants (Lankau et al. 2014) owing to the association between plant and AMF communities (Neuenkamp et al. 2018). Production of allelopathic compounds by alien plants may also function as a mechanism for mycorrhizal mutualism degradation (Pinzone et al. 2018; Hale et al. 2016). Another competitive advantage to NM alien plants is that they allocate less carbon belowground, in contrast to mycorrhizal plants that allocate a considerable amount of carbon to their associated mycorrhizal fungi belowground (Traveset and Richardson 2014). Taken together, NM plant invasions may have important consequences for the AMF community in a new habitat, particularly by disrupting AMF-native plant associations (Fig. 1).
Several survey studies suggest that the potential invasiveness of OM plants may also depend on the degree of specialization of plant species. Some OM plants are specialists and require specific AMF taxa to associate with (Torrez et al. 2016), whereas generalist plants are able to form associations with non-host-specific AMF taxa distributed in a broad geographical range and in the roots of a wide range of hosts (generalists) (Moora et al. 2011). There are a few studies assessing the performance of plant specialists and generalists outside of their native habitats. Using inoculation with a specific AMF inoculum in a field experiment, Torrez et al. (2016) observed a significant increase in species richness and diversity of plant specialist species compared to that in control plots without inoculum. A large-scale study of Trachycarpus fortunei in native, invasive and experimentally introduced ranges revealed that this generalist mycorrhizal species can replace its native AMF with the geographically widespread generalist AMF taxa present in introduced ranges (Moora et al. 2011). Swift et al. (2018) also demonstrated that the potential of multiple populations of Anoectochilus sandvicensis to associate with generalist AMF enabled this plant to spread across remote oceanic islands. Rodríguez-Caballero et al. (2018) showed that Pennisetum setaceum can establish and spread across five Mediterranean semiarid locations with different AMF communities because of its flexibility to associate with local AMF taxa. Taken together, associating with and benefiting from a diverse range of AMF may enable invasive plants to outcompete native plants, and hosting widely distributed generalist AMF taxa increases plant invasiveness owing to their adaptation to a wider range of environmental conditions (Pringle et al. 2009).
The spread of a specialist mycorrhizal plant species could be constrained by the lack of specific AMF taxa or by a poor performance of AMF taxa in introduced ranges (Egidi and Franks 2018). For example, plants may perform better when associated with AMF from their native range than with those from non-native ranges (Callaway et al. 2011). Co-invasion or introduction of symbionts independently can overcome this constraint. Hayward et al. (2015a) indicated that co-invasion of a single ectomycorrhizal fungus, Suillus luteus, is sufficient to enable Pinus contorta to become invasive in Coyhaique, Chile. A recent review article also highlights that pine trees always associate with suilloid fungi in both native and non-native habitats, reflecting the importance of the suilloid fungi group in the invasion success of pine (Policelli et al. 2019). While several studies have shown that ectomycorrhizal fungi are potentially co-introduced and may become co-invasive (Nuñez et al. 2009; Dickie et al. 2010; Bahram et al. 2013; Hayward et al. 2015b; Sulzbacher et al. 2018), to the best of our knowledge, the co-invasion potential of AMF has been reported only in one study (Spence et al. 2011). The rarity of AMF invasion reports can be at least partly ascribed to the widespread AMF distribution and commercial fungal inocula used in agricultural and horticultural contexts (Davison et al. 2015).
Mycorrhizal traits could mediate plant niche partitioning and expansion (Gerz et al. 2018). Native and invasive plant species (archaeophytes and neophytes) can occur in different geographic ranges due to their different degrees of mycorrhizal flexibility (Menzel et al. 2018), suggesting that the mycorrhizae-plant relationship may correlate with potential invasion in specific environmental conditions. In particular, the mycorrhizal traits of alien plants strongly determine their influence on the abundance, richness, and composition of mycorrhizal communities in new habitats (Hausmann and Hawkes 2009). For example, Zubek et al. (2016) found that the invasion of Reynoutria japonica, Rudbeckia laciniata, and Solidago gigantea decreased the abundance and diversity of the AMF community in new habitats to various degrees depending on their mycorrhizal traits. In a mesocosm study, Vogelsang and Bever (2009) showed that AMF mediated competition between a native mycorrhizal herbaceous forb (Gnaphalium californicum) and an invasive herbaceous forb (Carduus pycnocephalus) with low mycorrhizal dependency and that the invasive plant outcompeted the native species by disrupting its mutualisms with AMF.
There are only a few studies comparing the distribution of invasive plants based on their mycorrhizal traits. The mycorrhizal traits of only 33 invasive plants are known from a list of plants (n = 82) provided by the U.S. Invasive Species Impact Rank (Pringle et al. 2009). Menzel et al. (2017) showed that mycorrhizal invasive plants (FM and mycorrhizal plants) have an advantage over their NM counterparts, especially in the early stage of invasion, because their nutritional benefits gained from symbiosis seem to exceed the costs of carbon allocation. Moreover, FM species show a wider geographic distribution and ecological niche than mycorrhizal plant species (Menzel et al. 2017; Hempel et al. 2013; Gerz et al. 2018; Menzel et al. 2018). This is also in agreement with the observation of Gerz et al. (2018), who reported that FM plants consistently show wider niches compared to inflexible plants in relation to environmental variation, e.g., along soil fertility, moisture, pH and temperature gradients. There may be a strong relationship between mycorrhizal traits and habitat preference of plant species such that mycorrhizal plant species prefer to occupy soils with a lower nutrient and moisture content and a higher pH and temperature, while FM species show intermediate preferences and thus occupy wider ecological niches (Hempel et al. 2013). In addition, mycorrhizal plant species tend to be distributed at lower latitudes according to Bueno et al. (2017). Gerz et al. (2018) also observed niche differentiation among plants with different mycorrhizal traits. The authors showed that FM species have a wider distribution than plants with other mycorrhizal traits, such as mycorrhizal plants and NM species. In contrast, a review of the mycorrhizal traits of invasive plants showed that NM plant species comprise a greater proportion of invasive plants compared to mycorrhizal plants (Pringle et al. 2009). However, the limited available data on the mycorrhizal traits of invasive plants in their study may have resulted in an underestimation of the fraction of invasive mycorrhizal plants. In another study, investigation of three invasive plant species in the native AMF community revealed that the magnitude of plant invasion impact depends on their mycorrhizal dependency (Zubek et al. 2016). In addition, the impact of mycorrhizal dependency on the plant distribution may be confounded by the effects of environmental parameters, e.g., higher annual temperature enhances the proportion of mycorrhizal plants (Menzel et al. 2016).
Overall, although more controlled experiment studies are needed to support this, available data suggest that plant mycorrhizal traits influence PMNS and thus a) the establishment of alien plants, b) the strength of the neighbour effect and c) the role of AMF in plant invasion. In the case of generalist and FM plant species invasion, there may be shared AMF associations between invasive and native plants (Rodríguez-Caballero et al. 2018) (similar PMNS), implying that the AMF may have a neutral impact on plant invasion and that the AMF composition may not be severely altered (weak neighbour effect) (Fig. 1). This is supported by a study by Bunn et al. (2014), who found weak mycorrhizae-mediated invasion potential of Centaurea stoebe and Potentilla recta in the USA, reflected in negligible shifts in soil and root AMF communities across regions with different densities of invading exotic plants.
Plant traits
Growing evidence indicates that host plant traits have a significant impact on the structure of AMF communities across various habitats (Becklin et al. 2012), successional stages (Martínez-García et al. 2015) and elevational gradients (Li et al. 2014; Saitta et al. 2018). Despite shifts in soil properties, variation in AMF community composition over different ecosystem successional stages is explained by changes in plant communities (Martínez-García et al. 2015). Numerous studies have shown that plant diversity is a main factor driving mycorrhizal fungal richness and community composition across a range of habitats (e.g., Bahram et al. 2012; Martínez-García et al. 2015; García de León et al. 2016; Tedersoo et al. 2013; Krüger et al. 2017; Saitta et al. 2018). In addition, a global-scale meta-analysis showed that plant community composition is directly associated with AMF community composition, whereas the effect of climate and other ecosystem properties remained indirect and secondarily mediated by host plants (Yang et al. 2012).
However, little is known about the relationship between plant traits and associated mycorrhizal fungi, and various phenological and functional traits of alien plants may affect the structure of AMF communities (from a plant trait-based filter). The life cycle is a plant trait that could affect AMF communities. Annual and perennial plants can harbour different AMF communities in the root, rhizosphere and bulk soil (Alguacil et al. 2012). For instance, the root (not rhizosphere soil) of an annual herbaceous plant species harboured a higher diversity of AMF compared to that of a perennial herbaceous species (Torrecillas et al. 2012). Beauchamp et al. (2006) also observed that the structure of AMF communities in a riparian area depended on the richness of annual and perennial species.
Plant-life form (herbaceous versus woody) can also act as a major determinant of AMF community structure. Varela-Cervero et al. (2015) reported that similar AMF communities were harboured by herbaceous plant species (Thymus zygis and Thymus mastichina). López-García et al. (2014) found that plants with different life forms (annual herbs, perennial herbs and perennial semi-woody plants) are associated with distinct AMF communities. The AMF richness of forbs may be higher than that of grasses (Lekberg et al. 2013). Comparison between root samples of a native (Leymus mollis) and an invasive (Ammophila arenaria) dune grass revealed that both plant species share similar AMF communities (Johansen et al. 2016). In line with these findings, Lekberg et al., (2013) and Bunn et al. (2015) showed that AMF communities depended more strongly on the functional groups rather than the place of origin (or different invasive status) of plants.
Mycorrhizal colonization also depends on below-ground traits such as root dry matter content, root C:N (Legay et al. 2016), root diameter, and first-order root length (Li et al. 2017). Roots with higher C:N and dry matter content, thickness, and longer first-order roots have higher mycorrhizal colonization. However, a recent study found no link between root length and AMF colonization associated with Brachypodium distachyon (Donn et al. 2017).
Another major component of PMNS stems from ecological adaptations (ecosystem type) or ecological requirements of plant species (Öpik et al. 2009) (Fig. 1). In this context, plants associate with AMF according to their habitat preferences (habitat range). Veresoglou and Rillig (2014) suggested that the ecosystem type of plants, rather than their phylogenetic relatedness, determines the structure of AMF communities. For instance, forest specialist and habitat generalist plants tend to associate with specialist and generalist AMF, respectively (Davison et al. 2011; Öpik et al. 2009). In a global-scale study, a comparison of AMF richness between grassland and forest ecosystems demonstrated that the diversity of the AMF community was consistently higher in grasslands (Davison et al. 2015).
Plant traits can contribute to the structure of AMF communities either directly by altering abiotic soil characteristics (Kamutando et al. 2017; Stefanowicz et al. 2017, 2018) and releasing allelochemicals (Cipollini et al. 2012; Ruckli et al. 2016) or indirectly through suppression of native plant growth (exposing the native plant to C limitation) and changing the light intensity (Bunn et al. 2015; Jandová et al. 2014). Kamutando et al. (2017) showed that the invasive tree Acacia dealbata can modify the rhizospheric soil chemistry (pH, C, NO3, NH4, P, Mg) and consequently the structure of microbial communities. Gaggini et al. (2018) reported that Impatiens glandulifera significantly impacted the richness and composition of soil fungal communities by increasing soil moisture and pH. In addition, Stefanowicz et al. (2018) showed that the growth of four invasive and two native plants resulted in a considerable divergence in the physical and chemical properties of the soil. Even at the landscape scale, Martínez-García et al. (2011) found that shrub species provide different nutrient contents in the rhizosphere soil, explaining most of the landscape-scale variation in the AMF composition and diversity. Benzoxazinoids secreted by maize roots mediate the alteration of microbiota structure and composition in the rhizosphere (Hu et al. 2018). Zhalnina et al. (2018) demonstrated that plant root exudation traits in combination with microbial substrate preferences shape the rhizosphere-associated microbial communities. In contrast, a meta-analysis of 67 studies by Bunn et al. (2015) revealed no difference in the AMF colonization rate when native and invasive plants were grown separately, although the AMF colonization of native plants declined in the presence of the invasive plant. The authors suggested that this could result from shading and carbon limitations of the native plant. In another study, Jandová et al. (2014) showed that Heracleum mantegazzianum was responsible for changing the composition of soil microbial communities in the invaded communities by altering the environment and light conditions of the soil as a result of high biomass production.
In addition to plant traits, phylogenetic relatedness of alien and native plants may affect their AMF community relatedness, similar to what is observed in ectomycorrhizal fungal communities (Tedersoo et al. 2013). In contrast to ectomycorrhizal plants, however, phylogenetically similar arbuscular mycorrhizal plants tend to associate with compositionally more dissimilar AMF communities (Reinhart and Anacker 2014; Veresoglou and Rillig 2014). Nevertheless, it is important to consider the influence of ecosystem type to draw conclusions about the effect of plant phylogenetic relatedness on AMF, because closely related plants can originate from different ecosystem types (Veresoglou and Rillig 2014). The different ecosystem origins of plants could promote their coexistence in a community (Reinhart and Anacker 2014). Montesinos-Navarro et al. (2012) considered a broader plant phylogenetic diversity and suggested that there is no relationship between the phylogenetic relatedness of plants and the similarity of their associated AMF communities.
Regardless of whether similar plants associate with similar AMF communities, there is strong evidence that association with dissimilar AMF communities can promote coexistence among plants (Reinhart and Anacker 2014; Montesinos-Navarro et al. 2012). This is because distinct AMF taxa occupy different niches and provide plants with complementary resources, which could reflect the establishment potential of alien plants in a new habitat (Pringle et al. 2009). Enhanced resource partitioning (Montesinos-Navarro et al. 2018) and increased resource availability (Jiang et al. 2017) mediated by plant-AMF interactions could promote plant coexistences.
Taken together, although the available data are not sufficient to draw a definite conclusion, exploring the effects of plant traits and phylogeny on their associated mycorrhizal fungi as an important component of PMNS is an important step towards a more predictive understanding of invasiveness and invasibility.
Neighbour effect and priority effect
A growing body of literature shows that alien plants influence the structure of AMF communities in new habitats (known as neighbour effect) (Hausmann and Hawkes 2009, 2010; Werner and Kiers 2015; Helsen et al. 2016; Weidlich et al. 2017). Depending on the traits and mycorrhizal dependency of alien and native plants and their interactions, neighbour effects can be categorized into three types: controlling, synergistic, and neutral effects. A controlling effect occurs when alien plants skew the AMF composition of the new habitat towards the AMF composition of one of the host plants. A synergistic effect results in a novel AMF community not previously present in either host, whereas a neutral effect is observed when invasive plants have no effect on the AMF community in a new habitat or when native and alien plants have similar PMNS (Hausmann et al. 2009). Neighbour effects can facilitate or prevent the establishment of newly arriving alien plants (priority effect) (Weidlich et al. 2017) depending on the PMNS of the alien plants and the AMF community in the native habitat reshaped by neighbour effects.
Alien plants with synergistic and controlling impacts on the native habitat can act as a biotic filter on the ecological pool of AMF and consequently affect subsequent invasion by other alien plants (Hausmann and Hawkes 2010). The functional group of newcomer plants has a strong effect on the plant community composition. For instance, legumes can facilitate the growth of grasses and non-leguminous forbs when legumes are sown earlier (Weidlich et al. 2017). Sikes et al. (2016) showed that the emergence and biomass of plant species depend on the early introduction of native or alien fungi species. The biomass declined when native fungi were introduced early; however, early introduction of alien fungi species promoted an increase in their biomass. On the other hand, the abundance and colonization of AMF taxa co-invaded with the alien plant species is influenced by the priority effect imposed by earlier arriving AMF taxa. The abundance of Rhizophagus irregularis was higher than that of Glomus aggregatum when they were inoculated simultaneously, but the priority effect of G. aggregatum neutralized this effect and suppressed the subsequent AMF invader (Werner et al. 2015).
Collectively, available data suggest that plant invasion not only has a direct impact on the AMF and plant community of invaded habitats but also creates a long-lasting effect by facilitating further invasions by other plants. The strength of this effect depends on the degree of host specificity and mycorrhizal traits and thus the PMNS of the invasive and native plants. In extreme cases, such as when alien and native plants have similar PMNS or when the alien plant is a generalist or facultative mycorrhizal plant (i.e., able to associate with the native plant AMF community), the invasion may result in the smallest priority effects, i.e., a neutral effect on the establishment of next alien plant. Therefore, the priority effect is an important factor to consider in predicting the invasibility of a habitat and to enhance habitat resistance via early sowing or removing specific species (Lang et al. 2017).
Invasive status (plant provenance)
The impacts of plant invasive status on PMNS could be significant when exotic and native plants with similar plant traits and mycorrhizal dependency associate with dissimilar mycorrhizal fungi communities. This allows us to disentangle the effect of invasive status from other factors driving PMNS. Mummey and Rillig (2006) demonstrated that Centaurea maculosa invasion caused a significant reduction in AMF diversity outside C. maculosa’s native ranges. In contrast, a study on AMF and ectomycorrhizal communities associated with the bulk soil and roots of an invasive plant (Schinus terebinthifolius) and two native plants (Hamelia patens and Bidens alba) demonstrated a greater diversity of AMF and ectomycorrhizal fungi in the bulk soil and rhizosphere of invasive plants compared to in that of native plants (Dawkins and Esiobu 2017). In these studies, however, the effect of invasive status may have been confounded by other parameters, such as functional traits and mycorrhizal traits.
Only a few studies have addressed the contribution of invasive status in mycorrhizae-mediated plant invasion in relation to other factors. Lekberg et al. (2013) studied the vegetation types of invasive and native plants (forb and grass) on AMF associations and found that the colonization rate and diversity remained similar among similar functional groups of plants regardless of their invasive status.
Bunn et al. (2015) also performed a meta-analysis to determine the factors driving changes in AMF communities following invasion. The authors found that AMF colonization and abundance did not differ between native and invasive plants, whereas there were significant differences among functional groups, e.g., forbs were generally more colonized by AMF compared to grasses. In an experimental study, Gomes et al. (2018) evaluated not only the invasive status impact but also the proportion of plant identity and functional traits in shaping mycorrhizal diversity, finding that in addition to the invasive status, plant functional groups can explain mycorrhizal shifts following plant invasion. An evaluation of four invasive and two expansive native plant species on the abundance, richness, and composition of soil AMF communities as well as the growth of a native plant showed a stronger effect of plant identity than its invasive status due to their differences in mycorrhizal traits (Majewska et al. 2018).
In addition, the relationship between invasive status and the responsiveness of plants to AMF was evaluated by Reinhart et al. (2017), whose findings corroborated that invasive status has no effect on plant responsiveness to AMF. These findings suggest that the influence of plant species on AMF communities is more predictable based on plant functional traits rather than on plant invasive status. Thus, plant invasive status may not determine PMNS or the AMF shifts in mycorrhizal associations.
Plant response to mycorrhizal fungi
The response of plant species to mycorrhizal fungi ranged from positive to negative, depending on the combination of plant and fungal species (Klironomos 2003). Plant response to mycorrhizal communities is also considered a factor influencing mycorrhizae-mediated plant invasion. A recent study showed that invasive trees responded positively to soil AMF communities from different elevations, while native trees benefited only from soil AMF collected from their altitudinal distribution range (Urcelay et al. 2019). Plant responses to mycorrhizal communities of novel habitat can be explained by PMNS. Native and invasive plant species with dissimilar PMNS are expected to respond differently to AMF communities, independent of invasive status (Bunn et al. 2015). Rather than invasive status, the plant functional group was observed as a predictor of plant response to AMF association, e.g., forbs responded positively, while grasses showed neutral or negative responses (Bunn et al. 2015). Waller et al. (2016) showed that an invasive plant (Centaurea solstitialis) in both native and non-native ranges is less responsive to mycorrhizal fungal association than the native plant (Stipa pulchra) due to differences in mycorrhizal traits. There is a relationship between mycorrhizal association traits and plant responsiveness to AMF in which the response of mycorrhizal specialist plants is stronger than that of FM plants (Veresoglou et al. 2018).
On the other hand, it is not clear how alien plants with similar PMNS to native plants would respond to AMF communities in new habitats. High similarities between the PMNS of native and alien plants could enable alien plants to associate with their specific mycorrhizal fungi in new habitats, suggesting that the success of each competitor depends on their response to mycorrhizal fungi. For instance, a long-term field study comparing perennial native and exotic species with similar phylogenetic and functional groups showed that invasive plant species across functional groups could benefit more from the same mycorrhizal community in the new habitat through a higher colonization rate (Sielaff et al. n.d.). Thus, plant response to mycorrhizal communities in a new habitat could be a determinant factor for invasion success of an alien plant.
Current knowledge gaps and future research
Most of the mycorrhizae-mediated plant invasion studies to date rely on the mycorrhizal status and invasive status of invasive plants to assess (1) how they alter mycorrhizal fungi communities of new habitats to outcompete the native plants and (2) how the mycorrhizal status of invasive plants could translate into their potential invasiveness. The impacts of plant invasive status on the potential invasiveness can be determined by comparing alien and native plants with similar plant functional and mycorrhizal traits while considering the neighbour effect. By doing so, we can disentangle the effect of invasive status from other factors driving mycorrhizae-mediated plant invasion. There have been different observations regarding the impact of alien plants on the AMF communities in new habitats, from reduced (Mummey and Rillig 2006) to enhanced diversity (Dawkins and Esiobu 2017) of AMF in the soil and roots of native plants. In these studies, the effect of invasive status may have been confounded with other parameters, such as functional and mycorrhizal traits. This approach has led to the classification of invasive plants into a few groups, such as flexible and non-flexible or mycorrhizal and NM invasive plants. However, our review indicates that this approach may have limitations for a) uncovereing the mechanisms behind AMF community changes in new habitats following invasion and b) predicting the potential invasiveness of a plant species and the invasibility of a habitat, the role of AMF in plant invasion and the impact of invasion of a particular species on the AMF communities. Our review indicates that the magnitude and direction of native host plant impact on the invasion potential of alien plants remains largely understudied. In addition, most of the studies have focused on a few plant traits without evaluating the neighbour effect and the role of native plant communities, which may confound host plant effects. As a next major step towards mechanistic understanding of mycorrhizae-mediated plant invasion, further studies are needed to elucidate the factors driving mycorrhizal associations of plant species, especially plant quantitative and quantitative traits, to predict the PMNS of plant species. In particular, studies on the response of plants with similar PMNS to mycorrhizal communities may unravel mechanisms underlying the different invasiveness of plants and invasibility of habitats.
Summary
Given the significant impact of mycorrhizal fungi on the diversity, competitive ability, composition and distribution of plants and on ecosystem productivity, their effect on invasion is inevitable, yet under-recognized. Here, we attempted to highlight the importance of AMF in plant invasion by linking PMNS and plant invasiveness by characterizing some biotic factors that influence PMNS, including plant mycorrhizal and functional traits, priority effect and invasive status. We defined PMNS as a plant’s ability to exploit and shape the mycorrhizal fungal pool outside its native range depending on its dependency on mycorrhizal fungi, traits, place of origin (invasive status) and priority effects. The relative contribution of mycorrhizal traits, qualitative and quantitative traits of both invasive and native plants, and neighbour effects provide an opportunity to develop models to classify plant species into different PMNS. The model could help to predict the potential invasiveness of each plant in a particular habitat by comparing PMNS distance between native and invasive plants. These classifications enhance our understanding of the role of mycorrhizae in plant invasion trajectories and the impacts of invasion on the mycorrhizal communities of native habitats. Comparing the PMNS of alien and native species enables us to understand mycorrhizae-mediated plant invasion. The invasive and native PMNS reflect the role of mycorrhizal fungi in plant invasion and alien plant impact on the mycorrhizal fungi composition of the native community (strength of neighbour effect) such that there is a negative relation between the similarity of PMNS and the role of mycorrhizal fungi in plant invasion and alteration of mycorrhizal fungi following invasion. Differences between native and alien plants in terms of PMNS also determine the invasion strategy of alien plants. Alien plants with dissimilar PMNS can disrupt native mycorrhizal associations and hence alter the diversity, abundance and composition of mycorrhizae. On the other hand, plant response to mycorrhizal communities can be a determinant factor when both native and invasive plants tend to associate with similar mycorrhizal communities. Plants that can benefit more from associated mycorrhizal communities could win the competition. Multiple lines of evidence suggest that plant invasion may be independent of invasive status. Thus, a better understanding of mycorrhizae associated with alien and native plants could be obtained by unravelling relationships between the features of plants associated with the AMF community, which could provide an enhanced perspective to move towards a more predictive understanding of invasiveness and invasibility for restoration planning.
References
Aerts R, Ewald M, Nicolas M, Piat J, Skowronek S, Lenoir J, Hattab T, Garzón-López CX, Feilhauer H, Schmidtlein S (2017) Invasion by the alien tree Prunus serotina alters ecosystem functions in a temperate deciduous forest. Front Plant Sci 8:179
Alguacil MM, Torrecillas E, Roldán A, Díaz G, Torres MP (2012) Perennial plant species from semiarid gypsum soils support higher AMF diversity in roots than the annual Bromus rubens. Soil Biol Biochem 49:132–138
Bahram M, Põlme S, Kõljalg U, Zarre S, Tedersoo L (2012) Regional and local patterns of ectomycorrhizal fungal diversity and community structure along an altitudinal gradient in the Hyrcanian forests of northern Iran. New Phytol 193:465–473
Bahram M, Kõljalg U, Kohout P, Mirshahvaladi S, Tedersoo L (2013) Ectomycorrhizal fungi of exotic pine plantations in relation to native host trees in Iran: evidence of host range expansion by local symbionts to distantly related host taxa. Mycorrhiza 23:11–19
Beauchamp VB, Stromberg JC, Stutz JC (2006) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi associated with Populus–Salix stands in a semiarid riparian ecosystem. New Phytol 170:369–380
Becklin KM, Pallo ML, Galen C (2012) Willows indirectly reduce arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal colonization in understorey communities. J Ecol 100:343–351
Bennett JA, Maherali H, Reinhart KO, Lekberg Y, Hart MM, Klironomos J (2017) Plant-soil feedbacks and mycorrhizal type influence temperate forest population dynamics. Science 355:181–184
Bueno CG, Moora M, Gerz M, Davison J, Öpik M, Pärtel M, Helm A, Ronk A, Kühn I, Zobel M (2017) Plant mycorrhizal status, but not type, shifts with latitude and elevation in Europe. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 26:690–699
Bunn RA, Lekberg Y, Gallagher C, Rosendahl S, Ramsey PW (2014) Grassland invaders and their mycorrhizal symbionts: a study across climate and invasion gradients. Ecol Evol 4:794–805
Bunn RA, Ramsey PW, Lekberg Y (2015) Do native and invasive plants differ in their interactions with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi? A meta-analysis. J Ecol 103:1547–1556
Busby RR, Stromberger ME, Rodriguez G, Gebhart DL, Paschke MW (2013) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal community differs between a coexisting native shrub and introduced annual grass. Mycorrhiza 23:129–141
Callaway RM, Bedmar EJ, Reinhart KO, Silvan CG, Klironomos J (2011) Effects of soil biota from different ranges on Robinia invasion: acquiring mutualists and escaping pathogens. Ecology 92:1027–1035
Castro-Díez P, Pauchard A, Traveset A, Vilà M (2016) Linking the impacts of plant invasion on community functional structure and ecosystem properties. J Veg Sci 27:1233–1242
Cipollini D, Rigsby CM, Barto EK (2012) Microbes as targets and mediators of allelopathy in plants. J Chem Ecol 38:714–727
Cosme M, Fernández I, Van der Heijden MG, Pieterse CM (2018) Non-mycorrhizal plants: the exceptions that prove the rule. Trends Plant Sci 23:577–587
Dassen S, Cortois R, Martens H, de Hollander M, Kowalchuk GA, van der Putten WH, De Deyn GB (2017) Differential responses of soil bacteria, fungi, archaea and protists to plant species richness and plant functional group identity. Mol Ecol 26:4085–4098
Davison J, Öpik M, Daniell TJ, Moora M, Zobel M (2011) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities in plant roots are not random assemblages. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 78:103–115
Davison J, Moora M, Öpik M, Adholeya A, Ainsaar L, Bâ A, Burla S, Diedhiou AG, Hiiesalu I, Jairus T (2015) Global assessment of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus diversity reveals very low endemism. Science 349:970–973
Dawkins K, Esiobu N (2017) Arbuscular and ectomycorrhizal Fungi associated with the invasive Brazilian pepper tree (Schinus terebinthifolius) and two native plants in South Florida. Front Microbiol 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00665
Dickie IA, Bolstridge N, Cooper JA, Peltzer DA (2010) Co-invasion by Pinus and its mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol 187:475–484
Donn S, Kawasaki A, Delroy B, Chochois V, Watt M, Powell JR (2017) Root type is not an important driver of mycorrhizal colonisation in Brachypodium distachyon. Pedobiologia 65:5–15
Egidi E, Franks AE (2018) Incorporating fungal community ecology into invasion biology: challenges and opportunities. In: Microbiology Australia march 2018, pp 56–60
Friede M, Unger S, Hellmann C, Beyschlag W (2016) Conditions promoting mycorrhizal parasitism are of minor importance for competitive interactions in two differentially mycotrophic species. Front Plant Sci 7:1465
Gaggini L, Rusterholz H-P, Baur B (2018) The invasive plant Impatiens glandulifera affects soil fungal diversity and the bacterial community in forests. Appl Soil Ecol 124:335–343
García de León D, Moora M, Öpik M, Neuenkamp L, Gerz M, Jairus T, Vasar M, Bueno CG, Davison J, Zobel M (2016) Symbiont dynamics during ecosystem succession: co-occurring plant and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 92:fiw097
Gerz M, Bueno CG, Ozinga WA, Zobel M, Moora M (2018) Niche differentiation and expansion of plant species are associated with mycorrhizal symbiosis. J Ecol 106:254–264
Gibson MR, Richardson DM, Pauw A (2012) Can floral traits predict an invasive plant’s impact on native plant–pollinator communities? J Ecol 100:1216–1223
Gomes SI, Merckx VS, Hynson NA (2018) Biological invasions increase the richness of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi from a Hawaiian subtropical ecosystem. Biol Invasions 20:2421–2437
Hale AN, Lapointe L, KaliszInvader S (2016) Invader disruption of belowground plant mutualisms reduces carbon acquisition and alters allocation patterns in a native forest herb. New Phytol 209:542–549
Hausmann NT, Hawkes CV (2009) Plant neighborhood control of arbuscular mycorrhizal community composition. New Phytol 183:1188–1200
Hausmann NT, Hawkes CV (2010) Order of plant host establishment alters the composition of arbuscular mycorrhizal communities. Ecology 91:2333–2343
Hayward J, Horton TR, Pauchard A, Nuñez MA (2015a) A single ectomycorrhizal fungal species can enable a Pinus invasion. Ecology 96:1438–1444
Hayward J, Horton TR, Nuñez MA (2015b) Ectomycorrhizal fungal communities coinvading with Pinaceae host plants in Argentina: gringos bajo el Bosque. New Phytol 208:497–506
Helsen K, Hermy M, Honnay O (2016) A test of priority effect persistence in semi-natural grasslands through the removal of plant functional groups during community assembly. BMC Ecol 16:22
Hempel S, Götzenberger L, Kühn I, Michalski SG, Rillig MC, Zobel M, Moora M (2013) Mycorrhizas in the central European flora: relationships with plant life history traits and ecology. Ecology 94:1389–1399
Hu L, Robert CA, Cadot S, Zhang X, Ye M, Li B, Manzo D, Chervet N, Steinger T, van der Heijden MG (2018) Root exudate metabolites drive plant-soil feedbacks on growth and defense by shaping the rhizosphere microbiota. Nat Commun 9:2738
Jandová K, Klinerová T, Müllerová J, Pyšek P, Pergl J, Cajthaml T, Dostál P (2014) Long-term impact of Heracleum mantegazzianum invasion on soil chemical and biological characteristics. Soil Biol Biochem 68:270–278
Jiang J, Moore JA, Priyadarshi A, Classen AT (2017) Plant-mycorrhizal interactions mediate plant community coexistence by altering resource demand. Ecology 98:187–197
Johansen RB, Johnston P, Mieczkowski P, Perry GL, Robeson MS, Burns BR, Vilgalys R (2016) A native and an invasive dune grass share similar, patchily distributed, root-associated fungal communities. Fungal Ecol 23:141–155
Jordan NR, Aldrich-Wolfe L, Huerd SC, Larson DL, Muehlbauer G (2012) Soil–occupancy effects of invasive and native grassland plant species on composition and diversity of mycorrhizal associations. Invasive Plant Sci Manag 5:494–505
Kamutando CN, Vikram S, Kamgan-Nkuekam G, Makhalanyane TP, Greve M, Le Roux JJ, Richardson DM, Cowan D, Valverde A (2017) Soil nutritional status and biogeography influence rhizosphere microbial communities associated with the invasive tree Acacia dealbata. Sci Rep 7:6472. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-07018-w
Klironomos JN (2003) Variation in plant response to native and exotic arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Ecology 84:2292–2301
Krüger C, Kohout P, Janoušková M, Püschel D, Frouz J, Rydlová J (2017) Plant communities rather than soil properties structure arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities along primary succession on a mine spoil. Front Microbiol 8:719
Lang M, Hanslin HM, Kollmann J, Wagner T (2017) Suppression of an invasive legume by a native grass—high impact of priority effects. Basic Appl Ecol 22:20–27
Lankau RA, Bauer JT, Anderson MR, Anderson RC (2014) Long-term legacies and partial recovery of mycorrhizal communities after invasive plant removal. Biol Invasions 16:1979–1990
Legay N, Grassein F, Binet MN, Arnoldi C, Personeni E, Perigon S, Poly F, Pommier T, Puissant J, Clément JC (2016) Plant species identities and fertilization influence on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal colonisation and soil bacterial activities. Appl Soil Ecol 98:132–139
Lekberg Y, Gibbons SM, Rosendahl S, Ramsey PW (2013) Severe plant invasions can increase mycorrhizal fungal abundance and diversity. ISME J 7:1424–1433
Li X, Gai J, Cai X, Li X, Christie P, Zhang F, Zhang J (2014) Molecular diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi associated with two co-occurring perennial plant species on a Tibetan altitudinal gradient. Mycorrhiza 24:95–107
Li H, Liu B, McCormack ML, Ma Z, Guo D (2017) Diverse belowground resource strategies underlie plant species coexistence and spatial distribution in three grasslands along a precipitation gradient. New Phytol 216:1140–1150
Lin G, McCormack ML, Guo D (2015) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal effects on plant competition and community structure. J Ecol 103:1224–1232
López-García Á, Azcón-Aguilar C, Barea JM (2014) The interactions between plant life form and fungal traits of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi determine the symbiotic community. Oecologia 176:1075–1086
Majewska ML, Rola K, Stefanowicz AM, Nobis M, Blaszkowski J, Zubek S (2018) Do the impacts of alien invasive plants differ from expansive native ones? An experimental study on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi communities. Biol Fertil Soils:1–13
Martínez-García LB, Armas C, de Dios Miranda J, Padilla FM, Pugnaire FI (2011) Shrubs influence arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi communities in a semi-arid environment. Soil Biol Biochem 43:682–689
Martínez-García LB, Richardson SJ, Tylianakis JM, Peltzer DA, Dickie IA (2015) Host identity is a dominant driver of mycorrhizal fungal community composition during ecosystem development. New Phytol 205:1565–1576
McCary MA, Zellner M, Wise DH (2019) The role of plant–mycorrhizal mutualisms in deterring plant invasions: insights from an individual-based model. Ecol Evol 9:2018–2030
Menzel A, Hempel S, Manceur AM, Götzenberger L, Moora M, Rillig MC, Zobel M, Kühn I (2016) Distribution patterns of arbuscular mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal plant species in Germany. Perspect Plant Ecol Syst 21:78–88
Menzel A, Hempel S, Klotz S, Moora M, Pyšek P, Rillig MC, Zobel M, Kühn I (2017) Mycorrhizal status helps explain invasion success of alien plant species. Ecology 98:92–102
Menzel A, Hempel S, Davison J, Moora M, Pyšek P, Rillig MC, Zobel M, Kühn I (2018) Widely distributed native and alien plant species differ in arbuscular mycorrhizal associations and related functional trait interactions. Ecography 41:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.03367
Montesinos-Navarro A, Segarra-Moragues JG, Valiente-Banuet A, Verdú M (2012) Plant facilitation occurs between species differing in their associated arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol 196:835–844
Montesinos-Navarro, A., Valiente-Banuet, A., Verdú, M., 2018. Processes underlying the effect of mycorrhizal symbiosis on plant-plant interactions. Fungal Ecology In Press, Processes underlying the effect of mycorrhizal symbiosis on plant-plant interactions
Moora M (2014) Mycorrhizal traits and plant communities: perspectives for integration. J Veg Sci 25:1126–1132
Moora M, Berger S, Davison J, Öpik M, Bommarco R, Bruelheide H, Kühn I, Kunin WE, Metsis M, Rortais A (2011) Alien plants associate with widespread generalist arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal taxa: evidence from a continental-scale study using massively parallel 454 sequencing. J Biogeogr 38:1305–1317
Mummey DL, Rillig MC (2006) The invasive plant species Centaurea maculosa alters arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities in the field. Plant Soil 288:81–90
Neuenkamp L, Moora M, Öpik M, Davison J, Gerz M, Männistö M, Jairus T, Vasar M, Zobel M (2018) The role of plant mycorrhizal type and status in modulating the relationship between plant and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities. New Phytol 220:1236–1247
Nuñez MA, Horton TR, Simberloff D (2009) Lack of belowground mutualisms hinders Pinaceae invasions. Ecology 90:2352–2359
Öpik M, Metsis M, Daniell TJ, Zobel M, Moora M (2009) Large-scale parallel 454 sequencing reveals host ecological group specificity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in a boreonemoral forest. New Phytol 184:424–437
Pakpour S, Klironomos J (2015) The invasive plant, Brassica nigra, degrades local mycorrhizas across a wide geographical landscape. R Soc Open Sci 2:150300. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150300
Pauw A (2013) Can pollination niches facilitate plant coexistence? Trends Ecol Evol 28:30–37
Pimentel D, Zuniga R, Morrison D (2005) Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecol Econ 52:273–288
Pinzone, P., Potts, D., Pettibone, G., Warren, R., 2018. Do novel weapons that degrade mycorrhizal mutualisms promote species invasion? Plant Ecology 1–10, Do novel weapons that degrade mycorrhizal mutualisms promote species invasion?
Policelli N, Bruns TD, Vilgalys R, Nuñez MA (2019) Suilloid fungi as global drivers of pine invasions. New Phytol 222:714–725
Pringle A, Bever JD, Gardes M, Parrent JL, Rillig MC, Klironomos JN (2009) Mycorrhizal symbioses and plant invasions. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 40:699–715
Reinhart KO, Anacker BL (2014) More closely related plants have more distinct mycorrhizal communities. AoB Plants 6:plu051. https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plu051
Reinhart KO, Lekberg Y, Klironomos J, Maherali H (2017) Does responsiveness to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi depend on plant invasive status? Ecol Evol 7:6482–6492
Rodríguez-Caballero G, Caravaca F, Roldán A (2018) The unspecificity of the relationships between the invasive Pennisetum setaceum and mycorrhizal fungi may provide advantages during its establishment at semiarid Mediterranean sites. Sci Total Environ 630:1464–1471
Ruckli R, Rusterholz H-P, Baur B (2016) Disrupting ectomycorrhizal symbiosis: indirect effects of an annual invasive plant on growth and survival of beech (Fagus sylvatica) saplings. Perspect Plant Ecol Syst 19:12–20
Saitta A, Anslan S, Bahram M, Brocca L, Tedersoo L (2018) Tree species identity and diversity drive fungal richness and community composition along an elevational gradient in a Mediterranean ecosystem. Mycorrhiza 28:39–47
Shah MA, Reshi ZA, Khasa DP (2009) Arbuscular mycorrhizas: drivers or passengers of alien plant invasion. Bot Rev 75:397–417
Sielaff, A.C., Polley, H.W., Fuentes-Ramirez, A., Hofmockel, K., Wilsey, B.J., n.d. Mycorrhizal colonization and its relationship with plant performance differs between exotic and native grassland plant species. Biological Invasions In Press, Mycorrhizal colonization and its relationship with plant performance differs between exotic and native grassland plant species
Sikes BA, Hawkes CV, Fukami T (2016) Plant and root endophyte assembly history: interactive effects on native and exotic plants. Ecology 97:484–493
Spence LA, Dickie IA, Coomes DA (2011) Arbuscular mycorrhizal inoculum potential: a mechanism promoting positive diversity–invasibility relationships in mountain beech forests in New Zealand? Mycorrhiza 21:309–314
Stefanowicz AM, Stanek M, Nobis M, Zubek S (2017) Few effects of invasive plants Reynoutria japonica, Rudbeckia laciniata and Solidago gigantea on soil physical and chemical properties. Sci Total Environ 574:938–946
Stefanowicz AM, Majewska ML, Stanek M, Nobis M, Zubek S (2018) Differential influence of four invasive plant species on soil physicochemical properties in a pot experiment. J Soils Sediments 18:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-017-1873-3
Sulzbacher MA, Grebenc T, Bevilacqua CB, Steffen RB, Coelho G, Silveira AO, Jacques RJ, Antoniolli ZI (2018) Co-invasion of ectomycorrhizal fungi in the Brazilian Pampa biome. Appl Soil Ecol In press 130:194–201
Swift S, Munroe S, Im C, Tipton L, Hynson NA (2018) Remote tropical island colonization does not preclude symbiotic specialists: new evidence of mycorrhizal specificity across the geographic distribution of the Hawaiian endemic orchid Anoectochilus sandvicensis. Ann Bot 123:657–666
Tanner RA, Gange AC (2013) The impact of two non-native plant species on native flora performance: potential implications for habitat restoration. Plant Ecol 214:423–432
Tedersoo L, Mett M, Ishida TA, Bahram M (2013) Phylogenetic relationships among host plants explain differences in fungal species richness and community composition in ectomycorrhizal symbiosis. New Phytol 199:822–831
Teste FP, Kardol P, Turner BL, Wardle DA, Zemunik G, Renton M, Laliberté E (2017) Plant-soil feedback and the maintenance of diversity in Mediterranean-climate shrublands. Science 355:173–176
Torrecillas E, del Mar Alguacil M, Roldán A (2012) Differences in the AMF diversity in soil and roots between two annual and perennial gramineous plants co-occurring in a Mediterranean, semiarid degraded area. Plant Soil 354:97–106
Torrez V, Ceulemans T, Mergeay J, de Meester L, Honnay O (2016) Effects of adding an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi inoculum and of distance to donor sites on plant species recolonization following topsoil removal. Appl Veg Sci 19:7–19
Traveset A, Richardson DM (2014) Mutualistic interactions and biological invasions. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 45:89–113
Urcelay C, Longo S, Geml J, Tecco PA (2019) Can arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi from non-invaded montane ecosystems facilitate the growth of alien trees? Mycorrhiza 29:39–49
Varela-Cervero S, Vasar M, Davison J, Barea JM, Öpik M, Azcón-Aguilar C (2015) The composition of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities differs among the roots, spores and extraradical mycelia associated with five Mediterranean plant species. Environ Microbiol 17:2882–2895
Veresoglou SD, Rillig MC (2014) Do closely related plants host similar arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities? A meta-analysis. Plant Soil 377:395–406
Veresoglou SD, Rillig MC, Johnson D (2018) Responsiveness of plants to mycorrhiza regulates coexistence. J Ecol 106:1864–1875
Vilà M, Rohr RP, Espinar JL, Hulme PE, Pergl J, Le Roux JJ, Schaffner U, Pyšek P (2015) Explaining the variation in impacts of non-native plants on local-scale species richness: the role of phylogenetic relatedness. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 24:139–146
Vogelsang KM, Bever JD (2009) Mycorrhizal densities decline in association with nonnative plants and contribute to plant invasion. Ecology 90:399–407
Waller LP, Callaway RM, Klironomos JN, Ortega YK, Maron JL (2016) Reduced mycorrhizal responsiveness leads to increased competitive tolerance in an invasive exotic plant. J Ecol 104:1599–1607
Weidlich EW, von Gillhaussen P, Delory BM, Blossfeld S, Poorter H, Temperton VM (2017) The importance of being first: exploring priority and diversity effects in a grassland field experiment. Front Plant Sci 7:2008
Werner GD, Kiers ET (2015) Order of arrival structures arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization of plants. New Phytol 205:1515–1524
Yang H, Zang Y, Yuan Y, Tang J, Chen X (2012) Selectivity by host plants affects the distribution of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: evidence from ITS rDNA sequence metadata. BMC Evol Biol 12:50. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-12-50
Yang R, Zhou G, Zan S, Guo F, Su N, Li J (2014) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi facilitate the invasion of Solidago canadensis L. in southeastern China. Acta Oecol 61:71–77
Zhalnina K, Louie KB, Hao Z, Mansoori N, da Rocha UN, Shi S, Cho H, Karaoz U, Loqué D, Bowen BP (2018) Dynamic root exudate chemistry and microbial substrate preferences drive patterns in rhizosphere microbial community assembly. Nat Microbiol 3:470–480
Zhou Y, Li X, Gao Y, Liu H, Gao Y-B, van der Heijden MG, Ren A-Z (2018) Plant endophytes and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi alter plant competition. Funct Ecol 32:1168–1179
Zubek S, Majewska ML, B\laszkowski J, Stefanowicz AM, Nobis M, Kapusta P (2016) Invasive plants affect arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi abundance and species richness as well as the performance of native plants grown in invaded soils. Biol Fertil Soils 52:879–893
Acknowledgments
We thank two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on the manuscript. This study was funded by the Swedish Research Council (VR grant 2017-05019) and Geran Putra IPB (GP-IPB/2017/9523400).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Tatsuhiro Ezawa.
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aslani, F., Juraimi, A.S., Ahmad-Hamdani, M.S. et al. The role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in plant invasion trajectory. Plant Soil 441, 1–14 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-019-04127-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-019-04127-5