Abstract
Aims
To identify Rhizobium strains’ ability to biocontrol Sclerotium rolfsii, a fungus that causes serious damage to the common bean and other important crops, 78 previously isolated rhizobia from common bean were assessed.
Methods
Dual cultures, volatiles, indole-acetic acid (IAA), siderophore production and 16S rRNA sequencing were employed to select strains for pot and field experiments.
Results
Thirty-three antagonistic strains were detected in dual cultures, 16 of which were able to inhibit ≥84% fungus mycelial growth. Antagonistic strains produced up to 36.5 μg mL−1 of IAA, and a direct correlation was verified between IAA production and mycelium inhibition. SEMIA 460 inhibited 45% of mycelial growth through volatile compounds. 16S rRNA sequences confirmed strains as Rhizobium species. In pot condition, common bean plants grown on S. rolfsii-infested soil and inoculated with SEMIA 4032, 4077, 4088, 4080, 4085, or 439 presented less or no disease symptoms. The most efficient strains under field conditions, SEMIA 439 and 4088, decreased disease incidence by 18.3 and 14.5% of the S. rolfsii-infested control.
Conclusions
Rhizobium strains could be strong antagonists towards S. rolfsii growth. SEMIA 4032, 4077, 4088, 4080, 4085, and 439 are effective in the biological control of the collar rot of the common bean.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is considered one of the most important grain legumes produced worldwide. Brazil, China, India, Mexico, Myanmar, and the USA are the most important Phaseolus spp.-producing countries (FAO 2014). As for other crops, common bean cultivars have high nutritional requirements and require proper phytosanitary conditions to express their full genetic potential. In this way, microbial inoculation technologies have been studied to decrease the environmental impacts and production costs of agrochemical inputs on crops.
Rhizobia are bacteria that can induce root nodules on leguminous plants and convert atmospheric nitrogen into available ammonia (Lindström and Martinez-Romero 2005), and therefore are a widely used microbial inoculant. Pelegrin et al. (2009) and Soares et al. (2006) evaluated the Rhizobium tropici strain SEMIA 4077 and obtained common bean yields equivalent to the application of 70–80 kg ha−1 of nitrogen. Rhizobia can also stimulate both leguminous and non-leguminous growth via: the secretion of molecules analogous to plant hormones, such as auxins (i.e., IAA; Ghosh et al. 2015); solubilization of inorganic insoluble phosphates (Kumar and Ram 2014); mineralization of organic phosphates (López-López et al. 2010); improving iron acquisition and/or alleviating aluminum toxicity mediated by chelating molecules known as siderophores (Datta and Chakrabartty 2014; Roy and Chakrabartty 2000); decreasing ethylene inhibitory action via ACC deaminase activity (Glick 2005); and the induction of abiotic stress tolerance by secreting exopolysaccharides and formatting biofilm structures (Qurashi and Sabri 2012).
The legislation about the use of inoculants as biofertilizers are currently under development in the European Union and the USA (Malusá and Vassilev 2014). Since 1975, in Brazil, the Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock, and Supply (Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento, abbreviated as MAPA) regulated the commercialization of rhizobial inoculants. SEMIA, an official culture collection, was assigned to maintain the recommended bacterial inoculant strains for important crop species and also distribute those strains to the inoculant industry. Now, SEMIA 4077 (= CIAT 899 = UMR 1899 = HAMBI 1163 = DSM 11418 = ATCC 49672 = LMG 9503 = USDA 9030), SEMIA 4080 (= PRF 81), and SEMIA 4088 (= H 12) are the recommended strains for common bean inoculation in Brazil. SEMIA also contains hundreds of strains for which no recommendation status was designed due to their low efficiency in nitrogen fixation.
Besides their nitrogen-fixing ability, rhizobia could also be used as biological control agents, especially against phytopathogenic fungi, such as Fusarium solani (Dar et al. 1997), F. oxysporum, Rhizoctonia solani (de Jensen et al. 2002), Phytium sp. (Huang and Erickson 2007), and Verticillium sp. (Vargas et al. 2009). Biocontrol agents act through different mechanisms, such as: antibiotics (Robleto et al. 1998) and HCN (Chandra et al. 2007) action; nutrient competition (siderophores are often involved); action of extracellular cell wall-degrading enzymes, i.e., β-1,3-glucanases, proteases (Compant et al. 2005), and chitinases (Kacem et al. 2009); parasitization of hyphal tips and inhibition of reproductive structures, like sclerotia or zoospores; and detoxifying a pathogen’s virulence molecules, such as oxalic acid (Nagarajkumar et al. 2005) and hydrolytic enzymes. In addition, rhizobia could exert “indirect antagonism” by eliciting plant defense reactions (Elbadry et al. 2006).
Sclerotium rolfsii (teleomorph: Athelia rolfsii) is a necrotrophic, ubiquitous soil-borne phytopathogenic fungus responsible for severe crop losses, particularly in tropical and subtropical regions. Regarding the common bean, this fungus is known to promote collar rot disease, leading to complete wilting of the affected plants (Bianchini et al. 1997). Controlling S. rolfsii using chemicals is difficult for many reasons, such as dissemination of the fungus by contaminated equipment and machinery, the fungus’ ability to form sclerotia (Punja and Grogan 1981), and the extensive fungal host range of at least 500 plant species (Iquebal et al. 2017). Also, fungicide utilization leads to the killing of non-target beneficial microorganisms and contributes to water and soil pollution.
The extensive information available on rhizobial application and the potential among the vast number of strains/isolates stored in different culture collection centers for use as biocontrols could lead to rhizobia at least partially replacing agricultural pesticides. Therefore, the aim of this study was to reevaluate the SEMIA Culture Collection with a focus on identifying the first effective Rhizobium biocontrol agent for the collar rot disease of the common bean.
Materials and methods
Organisms, culturing media, and conditions
Bacteria previously isolated from common bean nodules and maintained at SEMIA Culture Collection (World Data Center on Microorganisms no. 443) were used in this study. Lyophilized bacteria were rehydrated and grown on YMA medium plates (Somasegaran and Hoben 2012) at 28 °C. Whenever a log-phase liquid culture was required, bacteria were multiplied in 15-mL tubes containing 5 mL of YM broth, which were placed in a rotary shaker (120 rpm) for 72 h.
The fungal pathogen was previously isolated from common bean plants cultivated at Viamão Research Center (geographic coordinates: 30°2′10.64”S and 51°1′17.65”W), at the Agriculture Department of Rio Grande do Sul State, located in Viamão, Brazil. The pathogen was identified as S. rolfsii based on its etiology and morphological characteristics (Mordue and Holliday 1974). S. rolfsii cultures were obtained by cultivation on PDA medium (Beever and Bollard 1970) for five days at 23 °C and with a 12-h photoperiod. Fungal identity was further confirmed by PCR amplification of an internally-transcribed spacer region using the ITS1/ITS4 universal primer (Kawasaki 1990). The amplified PCR product was sequenced and a BLASTN 2.7.0+ (Altschul et al. 1997) search using a query length of 597 revealed 99% homology to Sclerotium (Athelia) rolfsii (GenBank MF425542.1).
Dual culture assay
The screening of 78 bacterial strains from the SEMIA Culture Collection for S. rolfsii antagonism was performed based on a dual culture method on TY medium plates (Somasegaran and Hoben 2012). A 0.7-cm agar plug from a S. rolfsii culture was placed at the center of a 9-cm plate and the bacterium was streaked in a square form and incubated for five days at 23 °C and with a 12-h photoperiod (Supplementary Figure 1). Inhibition is described in percentages according to the equation (%) = [(C – 0.7) – (T – 0.7) / (C – 0.7)] × 100, where C is the mean of the fungal colony diameter (cm) from solely cultivated fungal plates and T is the fungal colony diameter (cm) in the dual culture. Each SEMIA strain was tested on three different plates.
Indole-acetic acid, siderophore, protease and cellulase detection
Antagonistic SEMIA strains detected in the dual cultures were tested in triplicate for IAA, siderophore, protease, and cellulase production. IAA production was evaluated based on the method of Asghar et al. (2002). Bacterial log-phase liquid cultures in 0.5 g L−1 tryptophan-supplemented broth were centrifuged for 5 min at 10,000 rpm and 500 μL of the supernatants were placed in microtubes to react with 500 μL of Salkowski reagent (2 mL 0.5 mol L−1 FeCl3 + 98 mL 35% HClO4). The mixture was left in the dark for 15 min at room temperature, and subsequent spectrophotometer measurements were taken at 520 nm. The IAA concentration was inferred from a standard curve.
The effect of exogenous IAA on S. rolfsii growth was also measured. Different IAA concentrations (0, 0.5, 5, 50, 500, or 5000 μM) were added to TY medium and a 0.7-cm agar plug from a S. rolfsii culture was placed at the center of a 9-cm plate. TY medium without IAA served as a control. Plates were incubated for five days at 23 °C and with a 12-h photoperiod. IAA inhibition is described in percentages according to the equation (%) = [(C – 0.7) – (T – 0.7) / (C – 0.7)] × 100, where C is the fungal colony diameter (cm) in the TY medium and T is the fungal colony diameter (cm) in the IAA-supplemented TY medium. Each IAA concentration was tested on five different plates.
The proteolytic and cellulolytic activities of antagonistic strains were inferred by the detection of hydrolyzed zones on agar plates containing skim milk (Montanhini et al. 2013) or carboxymethyl cellulose (Kasana et al. 2008) after inoculation with 5-μL drops of bacterial log-phase liquid cultures.
For siderophore detection, the bacterium strain was multiplied in 100% and 1:2 water diluted with iron-deficient liquid King’s B medium as previously described (Schwyn and Neilands 1987). Subsequently, cultures were centrifuged for 5 min at 10,000 rpm and an aliquot of 50 μL was collected and dropped onto a microplate along with 50 μL of chrome azurol-S (CAS) reagent, followed by incubation for 15 min. Bacterial strains that changed the color of the reaction mixture from blue to orange were considered positive for siderophore production. Antagonistic activity related to siderophores was determined through the comparison of iron-deficient King’s B-treated cultures with ones supplemented with 100 μM of FeCl3 (Bevivino et al. 1998) in dual culture assays.
Volatile detection through the double plate assay
Antagonistic SEMIA strains with different characteristics were selected for further testing. Production of volatile compounds that inhibited fungal mycelial growth was detected via the double plate assay. A 0.7-cm agar plug from a S. rolfsii culture was placed at the center of a PDA medium plate. Subsequently, 30 μL of bacterial log-phase liquid culture were spread on Congo Red YM medium plates. Petri dishes containing the fungal plug were then placed inverted over the plate with the bacterium, and control treatments were prepared without the bacteria. The plates were incubated for five days at 23 °C and with a 12-h photoperiod. Each SEMIA strain was tested on three different plates. Inhibition through volatiles is presented in percentages according to the inhibition equation used for dual cultures.
16S rRNA sequence analysis
The genomic DNA of each selected SEMIA strain was extracted and purified according to the method of Joseph and David (2001). The 16S rRNA was amplified using the BacPaeF (5’AGA GTT TGA TCC TGG CTC AG3’) and Bac1542R (5’AGA AAG GAG GTG ATC CAG CC3’) primers, according to the methods of Stackebrandt and Liesack (1993) and Edwards et al. (1989), in a final volume of 25 μL containing 20–50 ng of genomic DNA, 1 μL of 100 pmol of each primer, 1 μL of 0.25 mmol L−1 dNTP mix, 1 μL of 50 mmol L−1 MgCl2, 1 μL of DMSO, 2.5 μL of Taq DNA Polymerase PCR Buffer (10×), and 0.2 μL of Taq DNA Polymerase (Thermo Scientific). The PCR cycling program was: 94 °C for 5 min, followed by 37 cycles of 94 °C for 1 min, 50 °C for 1 min and 10 s, and 72 °C for 1 min; for the final step, the reaction was incubated at 72 °C for 5 min. Nucleotide sequences were determined on both strands of PCR amplification products at the Macrogen sequencing facility (Macrogen Inc., Seoul, South Korea) using an ABI3730XL. Low-quality sequences were trimmed using Chromas 2.6.4 software.
Sequence identity was assessed by comparing the 16S rRNA sequences of the SEMIA strains with the sequences from EzBioCloud (https://www.ezbiocloud.net/identify), a quality-controlled 16S rRNA server database.
The 16S rRNA-based phylogeny was construct employing 16S rRNA sequences from SEMIA and 111 Rhizobium type strains available in LPSN (available at http://www.bacterio.net). Sequences were aligned with MUSCLE on MEGA7 software. Bayesian analyses was prepared using BEAST v1.8.4 software. HKI was selected as the mode of nucleotide evolution. The Yule process was selected as a tree prior to Bayesian analysis. The MCMC algorithm ran for 10,000,000 generations. The trees were visualized and edited using FigTree 1.4.3 software.
The sequence data reported in this study are publicly deposited in GenBank under accession no. MH236581-MH236590.
Biocontrol pot and field experiments
S. rolfsii inoculum was made according to the method of Falcão et al. (2005), with slight modifications. Erlenmeyer flasks containing moistened (20% m/v) maize (Zea mays L.) grains were autoclaved at 120 °C for 20 min. Afterward, 0.7-cm agar plugs from a S. rolfsii culture were placed in the flask and then incubated for 14 days at 23 °C and with a 12-h photoperiod. Pre-sprouting common bean cv. FEPAGRO Triunfo (Brazilian National Register of Cultivars no. 31.376) seeds were obtained after placing the seeds in moistened filter paper following incubation in germination chambers for 2 days (16 h of light at 30 °C and 8 h of dark at 20 °C). Pre-sprouting seeds were immersed in bacterial log-phase liquid cultures for 5 min. Subsequently, 180-mL pots were filled with non-autoclaved field soil, with the following characteristics: pH = 5.40, organic matter = 0.4%, CEC pH 7 = 3.5 and effective CEC (ECEC) = 1.8, p = 42.9 mg/dm−3, K = 41 mg/dm−3, Al = 0.1 cmolc/dm−3, Ca = 1.1 cmolc/dm−3, Mg = 0.5 cmolc/dm−3, H + Al = 1.7 cmolc/dm−3, B = 0.4 mg/dm−3, Zn = 3.2 mg/dm−3, Cu = 0.3 mg/dm−3, Mn = 29 mg/dm−3, Na = 4 mg/dm−3, Arg = 7%, and Fe = 0.04%. Soil infestation was made with two S. rolfsii-infected maize grains that were placed along the pots, at the same depth and on each side of one bacteria-inoculated pre-sprouting common bean seed (Supplementary Figure 2). Two control treatments were arranged. Treatment “-” (negative control) was composed of common bean plants that were not inoculated with bacteria, which were allowed to grow in non-infested soil. “Treatment +” (positive control) was composed of common bean plants that were not inoculated with bacteria, but were cultivated in S. rolfsii-infested soil. Three replicates were used per treatment. The plants were inspected periodically to determine disease manifestation development. Shoot dry masses were recorded through separation of the aerial part of each plant after drying at 60 °C to a constant mass.
Rhizobial strains were selected for field trial based on pot test results. Field experiment was carried out at Viamão Research Center. For this, plastic bags containing 30 common bean seeds were inoculated with 2 mL of bacterial log-phase liquid cultures before being sown on a soil. The experiment was conducted in a randomized block design with 4 replications. Plot size was 1.2 m × 2 m with 40 cm line-to-line spacing. The space between the blocks and plots were both 1 m each. Despite the soil being already naturally infested with S. rolfsii, to guarantee disease manifestation the common bean seeds were sown intercalated with S. rolfsii-infected maize grains as described before, and then covered with soil with the following characteristics pH = 6.0, organic matter = 2.2%, CEC pH 7 = 9.4 and effective CEC (ECEC) = 5.0, p = 5.4 mg/dm−3, K = 123 mg/dm−3, Al = 0.0 cmolc/dm−3, Ca = 3.3 cmolc/dm−3, Mg = 1.4 cmolc/dm−3, H + Al = 4.4 cmolc/dm−3, B = 0.2 mg/dm−3, Zn = 4.9 mg/dm−3, Cu = 0.8 mg/dm−3, Mn = 12.5 mg/dm−3, Na = 3 mg/dm−3, Arg = 24%, and Fe = 0.3%. A bacterial-uninoculated control treatment (“Treatment +”) was also arranged. No plant protection measure for controlling diseases of the crop or nitrogen fertilizer was applied. The experimental plots were inspected periodically to determine disease manifestation development. At the beginning of the flowering stage (around 40 days after being sown) disease incidence was recorded according to the equation disease incidence (%) = (number of completely wilted plants / number of germinated plants) × 100. A disease progress curve was plotted and the area under the disease progress curve (AUDPC) for each treatment was estimated.
Statistical analysis
Using the Sisvar 5.6 platform (Ferreira 2011), the results obtained from the dual culture, double plate, exogenous IAA influence on fungal growth, and biocontrol tests were submitted to one-way analysis of variance and the means were compared by the Scott-Knott (SK) test at a 5% error probability. Spearman’s correlation was used to evaluate IAA production and fungal mycelium inhibition on dual cultures. Data from evaluating the antagonistic activity related to siderophores were submitted to the F test, and then the means were compared by Student’s t test at the 5% level of significance.
Results
SEMIA rizobial strains strongly antagonize S. rolfsii growth
Dual cultures were performed to screen the SEMIA Culture Collection for biocontrol properties against the pathogenic fungus S. rolfsii (Fig. 1a). Among the 78 screened strains, 33 (~42%) of them showed significant antagonistic activity, and 16 were able to decrease over 84% of the fungal mycelium growth. SEMIA 456, 4026, and 436 presented inhibition rates above 98% of mycelia growth. The MAPA-recommended strains SEMIA 4080, 4077 and 4088 were able to decrease the mycelial growth by 86%, 86%, and 60%, respectively.
Bacterial IAA production correlates with S. rolfsii inhibition
In vitro, the antagonistic SEMIA strains produced 1.2 to 36.5 μg mL−1 of IAA. The MAPA-recommended strains SEMIA 4077, 4080, and 4088 produced 2.5, 6.1, and 4.7 μg mL−1 of IAA, respectively. The prominent IAA producers, SEMIA 456 (34.7 μg mL−1) and 439 (36.5 μg mL−1), were grouped along with major S. rolfsii antagonists in dual cultures. A significant correlation (r = 0.447, p = 0.011) was obtained between bacterial IAA production and S. rolfsii mycelial growth inhibition in the dual cultures (Fig. 1b). The effect of exogenous IAA on the growth of S. rolfsii was studied (Fig. 1c). TY medium supplemented with 50 μM (8.8 μg mL−1) of IAA had no effect on fungal growth; however, S. rolfsii growth was decreased at IAA concentrations of 250 (43.8 μg mL−1) and 500 μM (87.6 μg mL−1). The highest concentration (5000 μM or 876 μg mL−1) of IAA inhibited over 99% of fungal growth.
Some SEMIA strains produce lytic enzymes and siderophores
Among the 33 antagonistic strains found, siderophore production was detected only in SEMIA 436, 460, 4077, and 4088. A 100-μM FeCl3 supplement upon growth is expected to inhibit siderophore compound synthesis (Visca et al. 1992). In order to evaluate if the SEMIA strains’ antagonistic activity on S. rolfsii mycelium growth was related to the iron availability in the growth media, dual cultures with either iron-deficient or FeCl3-supplemented King’s B medium were performed (Fig. 2a). Dual cultures with SEMIA 4088 plates in FeCl3-supplemented medium had 13% greater mycelium spread than iron-deficient plates; no other statistically significant differences in mycelium growth were found. Lytic enzyme presence was also tested, and SEMIA 4026, 4031, and 4079 were the only strains that produced proteases; cellulase production was not detected (data not shown).
For further testing, we selected the antagonistic strains i) SEMIA 456 (= F 33 = D19 RICp = Br 209), SEMIA 4026 (= CAR 29), SEMIA 436 (= F 27), SEMIA 439 (= F 35 = D 71) and SEMIA 4032 (= TAL 659 = ALLEN 413–2 = UW 4032) due to their strong fungal inhibition (≥93%) and IAA production features; ii) SEMIA 460 (= F 37) was selected as a median inhibitor (51%) and for the presence of a mucoid colony phenotype (often an indication of enhanced biofilm formation with possible biocontrol implications, according to Chen et al. (2013); iii) SEMIA 4085 (= USDA 2918 = R602sp = EMBRAPA Soja 172) was selected as a poor inhibitor (10%); and iv) SEMIA 4080, 4077 and 4088 because they are MAPA-recommended strains.
Some SEMIA strains antagonize S. rolfsii growth through the production of volatile compounds
Selected antagonistic SEMIA strains were tested, employing the double plate technique, for the production of volatile substances that could inhibit fungal growth (Fig. 2b). SEMIA 460, 4077, and 4088 decreased mycelium diameters by 45%, 28%, and 28% through the production of volatile compounds, respectively.
16S rRNA sequence similarity analysis and phylogenetics of SEMIA strains
The genus of the SEMIA strains was discovered/confirmed by similarity-based searches against quality-controlled databases of 16S rRNA sequences with EzBioCloud’s Identify service (Supplementary Table 1). All SEMIA strains presented higher gene similarities with species belonging to the Rhizobium genus.
A phylogenetic tree was generated with SEMIA sequences and the Rhizobium-type strains (Fig. 3). SEMIA 4077 (R. tropici), 4080, and 4088 (R. freire) were grouped along with R. hainanense, R. miluonense, and R. multihospitium; SEMIA 4085 (R. gallicum) and SEMIA 460 were grouped with R. anhuiense, R. trifolii, R. leguminosarum, R. acidisoli, and R. laguerreae; and SEMIA 436, 439, 456, 4026, 4032 were grouped with R. radiobacter and R. pusense.
SEMIA strains exhibit biocontrol efficacy on collar rot of the common bean
In order to provide preliminary data on SEMIA strains activities in planta, a biocontrol pot experiment was first conducted to select strains for a field test. The common bean cultivated in S. rolfsii-infested soil and inoculated with SEMIA 4032, 4077, 4088, 4080, or 4085 strains presented no symptoms of collar rot (Fig. 4a). Moreover, treatments with SEMIA 4032, 4077, 4088, 4080, 4085, or 439 presented similar shoot dry masses of the uninoculated plants grown on uninfested soil according to SK test at a 5% error probability (Fig. 4b). The common bean inoculated with SEMIA 4026, 436, 460, or 456 strains exhibited stem rot symptoms and present similar shoot dry masses of the uninoculated plants grown on infested soil.
In the field trial, the disease incidence was attenuated with SEMIA 4032, 4077, 4088, 4080, 4085, or 439 strains treatments (Fig. 5a). The most efficient strains detected, SEMIA 439 and SEMIA 4088, decreased 18.3 and 14.5% of the S. rolfsii-promoted disease incidence, respectively. The remnants strains were able to decrease disease incidence by 12.5 to 8.7%. Since disease incidence was recorded over the time, the AUDPC (Fig. 5b) was estimated. Only the SEMIA 439 and SEMIA 4088 treatments presented AUDPC values statistically significantly lower from the uninoculated treatment. SEMIA 439 and 4088 decreased 19.9 and 17.5% of the AUDPC comparing to uninoculated controls, respectively.
Discussion
In an attempt to promptly obtain a biocontrol agent against S. rolfsii-induced disease in the common bean, we evaluated bacterial strains from SEMIA, a previously stabilized culture collection. Dual culture screens have been used as an effective approach to prospect biocontrol agents and some authors reported bacterial and fungal antagonism toward S. rolfsii mycelium growth in dual-culture experiments. Rhizobial isolates from groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) inhibited up to 62.5% of the S. rolfsii mycelium growth diameter (Ganesan et al. 2007). Shaban and El-Bramawy (2011) reported 85.5% mycelial inhibition of S. rolfsii when they evaluated a Rhizobium leguminosarum isolate. Bacillus tequilensis (Gholami et al. 2014), Trichoderma harzianum (Sabet et al. 1998), and Trichoderma viride (Manjula et al. 2004) were able to inhibit 73.6%, 45%, and 58% of S. rolfsii mycelium growth, respectively. In the present work, the prominently antagonistic SEMIA strains demonstrated up to 99% inhibition of S. rolfsii mycelium growth in dual cultures.
Antagonistic SEMIA strains produced IAA concentrations similar to that of a previously reported Rhizobium spp. that showed beneficial effects on plants (Bhattacharjee et al. 2012). IAA synthesis is considered a common feature in soil-beneficial bacteria and part of their plant colonization strategy. IAA is often considered one of the most effective plant-growth inducers (Vargas et al. 2017). IAA produced by rhizobia is involved in the nodulation process (Boiero et al. 2007; Pii et al. 2007) and root architecture modification (Yanni et al. 2001); however, high IAA concentrations have shown an unresponsive effect and/or adverse impact on plant growth. As an example, Schlindwein et al. (2008) reported lettuce seeds with abnormal germination when those seeds were treated with an IAA-overproducing (171.1 μg.ml−1) R. trifolii strain.
In a biocontrol context, the phytostimulation action of IAA produced by beneficial bacteria could be helpful; however, this action relies on the plant. Exogenous IAA exerts stimulatory and inhibitory effects on fungi (Fu et al. 2015). IAA was also reported to trigger protection against external adverse conditions by enhancing different cellular defense systems in Escherichia coli (Bianco et al. 2006). Here, we hypothesized a direct relationship between in vitro bacterial IAA production and S. rolfsii mycelial growth inhibition and found a significant (p = 0.011) but weak correlation (r = 0.447). Kulkarni et al. (2013) reported that 0.5, 5, and 50-μM concentrations of exogenous IAA can induce Fusarium delphinoides growth. However, at higher concentrations (500 and 5000 μM), IAA considerably decreased the growth of this fungus. Here, we found that 250 and 500 μM of IAA supplementation to the medium decreased fungal growth, while 5000 μM almost ceased it. Interestingly, SEMIA 439, the most preeminent IAA producer detected here, also grouped along the greater fungal inhibitors, produced 208 μM IAA. This result points out a function in soil competitiveness for beneficial bacterial IAA, not merely the improvement of plant-bacteria interaction fitness. It remains to be elucidated if IAA has a secondary role stimulating responses in the prokaryotic cell, besides its direct impact on fungal mycelium growth.
Besides IAA action, biological control agents can negatively affect the growth of plant pathogens by several other mechanisms. For example, Rodriguez-Kabana et al. (1978) reported that the proteolytic activity of Trichoderma viride was crucial for disrupting S. rolfsii’s enzymatic activity. Therefore, we tested protease exportation to the culture medium and found this characteristic in only three (~9%) of the 33 antagonistic SEMIA strains. Siderophore-producing antagonistic rhizobia were also reported (Granada et al. 2014; Vargas et al. 2009); however, siderophore production is not always related to antagonistic activity, as was already reported regarding Burkholderia cepacia (Bach et al. 2016). Genome sequencing revealed that SEMIA 4077 possesses a siderophore-biosynthesis gene cluster, whereas SEMIA 4080 does not (Ormeño-Orrillo et al. 2012). In agreement, SEMIA 436 and 460 and the MAPA-recommended strains SEMIA 4077 and 4088 were identified as siderophore producers. However, SEMIA 4088 was the only strain that demonstrated a slightly antagonistic activity related to siderophore production.
In addition to the production of diffusible antifungal molecules, such as lytic enzymes and siderophores (Kümmerli et al. 2014), some bacteria also synthesize volatile compounds that influence fungal growth (Bhagat et al. 2014; Wheatley 2002). As an example, soil bacterial volatiles were reported to completely stop the laccase activity of Phanerochaete magnolia (Mackie and Wheatley 1999). Laccase is an important virulence factor for various phytopathogenic fungi because it protects them from plant defense molecules, such as tannins and phytoalexins (Pezet et al. 1992). Ganesan et al. (2007) reported inhibition of up to 11% of S. rolfsii growth by volatiles produced by Rhizobium species. Here, SEMIA 460 was the major volatile inhibitor (45%); these volatiles were likely its major antagonism mechanism, considering the 51% inhibition detected in the dual cultures.
Bacterial strains from the SEMIA Culture Collection were previously identified as Rhizobium spp. based on prospecting from common bean root nodules and cultural characteristics. To confirm that bacterial identification, 16S rRNA sequence analysis was employed. To provide reliable identification since it may be compromised by the quality of sequences deposited in public databases (i.e., NCBI), the curated 16S rRNA database EzBioCloud (Yoon et al. 2017) was chosen for comparisons and the Rhizobium spp. identities of the SEMIA 456, 4026, 436, 439, 4032, 460, 4085, 4080, 4077, and 4088 strains were confirmed. As expected, although 16S rRNA analysis allows the identification of the Rhizobium genus, this high degree of gene conservation seriously limited the separation at the species level.
The SEMIA 4077 and 4080 sequences that we obtained presented highly similar (99%) 16S rRNA gene sequences. Often considered one of the most successful symbionts of the common bean, SEMIA 4077 is the type strain of the Rhizobium tropici species (Martínez-Romero et al. 1991). SEMIA 4080, which in the past was considered a Rhizobium tropici strain, shares only 52% of its genome sequence with SEMIA 4077 (Ormeño-Orrillo et al. 2012). Recently, SEMIA 4080 was recognized as the first Rhizobium freirei strain described (Dall’Agnol et al. 2013).
In the phylogenetic tree with 111 Rhizobium-type strain sequences, SEMIA 436, 439, 456, 4026, and 4032 were placed in a branch with R. pusense and R. radiobacter (Agrobacterium tumefaciens). These bacteria, which could be placed on controversial Agrobacterium genus (Ramírez-Bahena et al. 2014; Young et al. 2001), are usually known for being tumorigenic; therefore, they would not be expected to form nitrogen-fixing nodules. However, Ribeiro et al. (2013) reported strains related to R. radiobacter, R. nepotum, and R. pusense according to 16S rRNA analysis, which were isolated from the common bean and could form white nodules on roots.
Nodulation (nod) and nitrogen-fixation genes (nif and fix) are often clustered on large plasmids (Sym plasmid) or within genomic symbiosis islands (SI), which are often found within insertion sequence elements, transposases, and related genes (MacLean et al. 2007). Root-nodulating bacteria that, according to ribosomal gene analysis, were related to “non-rhizobial” species/genus have been found to naturally harbor the nod genes essential for establishing rhizobial symbiosis (Moulin et al. 2001; Trujillo et al. 2006). Martínez et al. (1987) engineered agrobacteria to harbor the Sym plasmid and obtained a mutant that could form nitrogen-fixing nodules. In addition, agrobacteria could lose their tumorigenic characteristics, i.e., high temperature (>28 °C) culturing leads to “loosening” of the Ti plasmid in the bacterial population (Schilperoort et al. 1980).
In this work, dual culture screens were used to prospect an efficient bacterial biocontrol agent of S. rolfsii-induced disease of the common bean. Dual cultures are widely used for this purpose and according to Shehata et al. (2016) the results strongly correlate with microbial activities in planta. However, SEMIA 4026, 436, and 456 were strong in vitro fungal antagonists but did not succeed in controlling the disease in planta. A dual culture-screened isolate may not succeed in planta for many reasons (i.e., the bacteria did not properly colonize the plant and/or compete with native microbiota). SEMIA 4085 succeeded in controlling collar rot disease, despite being selected as a poor in vitro inhibitor. Dual culture screens could not detect microorganisms that were effective in planta primarily/only through “indirect antagonism,” such as inducing host resistance or competing for ecological plant niches (Knudsen et al. 1997; Pang et al. 2009). In fact, rhizobia were previously reported to elicit systemic resistance in plants (Elbadry et al. 2006).
Previous research has shown the efficacy of different biological agents in controlling S. rolfsii disease in common bean cultivated under pot conditions. Barakat et al. (2006) reported that different Trichoderma treatments reduced the disease indexes up to 66.8%. Gholami et al. (2014) reported that Bacillus and Streptomyces treatments reduced the disease severity up to 58.5%. Madi et al. (1997) reported 64% of disease reduction in soil infested with sclerotia treated with Talaromyces flavus. In the present study, in pot tests, common bean grown on S. rolfsii-infested soil and inoculated with SEMIA 4032, 4077, 4088, 4080 and 4085 presented no symptoms of stem rot and wilt caused by S. rolfsii. An exploratory field trial with SEMIA 4032, 4077, 4088, 4080, 4085, and 439 confirmed their biocontrol ability. The most efficient strains detected, SEMIA 439 and SEMIA 4088, decreased 18.3 and 14.5% of the S. rolfsii-promoted disease incidence, respectively. The AUDPC was estimated for each treatment to quantitative summary the disease intensity over time. SEMIA 439 and SEMIA 4088 also decreased 19.9 and 17.5% of the area under the collar root disease progress curve comparing to uninoculated controls, respectively. We speculate that a higher efficacy on field could be reached by controlling the requirement of pathogen inocula through a previous assessment of fungal quantity naturally present in the soil.
Besides the action of several antifungal molecules, the suppression of collar rot may be due to plant growth promotion and/or symbiotic efficiency, which could explain detection of all MAPA-recommended strains as biocontrol agents, which are well known to significantly increase plant shoot and root mass (Fageria et al. 2014; Kellman et al. 2005; Korir et al. 2017). SEMIA 4088 (= H 12) strain is already recognized as an efficient N-fixing bacteria, thus being already allowed for commercial production of inoculants in Brazil. The data obtained in this work support that SEMIA 4088 can also be commercialized for biocontroling the collar rot caused by S. rolfsii on common bean crops.
Abbreviations
- IAA:
-
Indole-acetic-acid
- MAPA:
-
Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock, and Supply
- AUDPC:
-
Area under the disease progress curve
References
Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI–BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25:3389–3402. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/25.17.3389
Asghar H, Zahir Z, Arshad M, Khaliq A (2002) Relationship between in vitro production of auxins by rhizobacteria and their growth–promoting activities in Brassica juncea. L Biol Fertil Soils 35:231–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-002-0462-8
Bach E, dos Santos Seger GD, de Carvalho Fernandes G, Lisboa BB, LMP P (2016) Evaluation of biological control and rhizosphere competence of plant growth promoting bacteria. Appl Soil Ecol 99:141–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.11.002
Barakat RM, Al-Mahareeq F, Al-Masri MI (2006) Biological control of Sclerotium rolfsii by using indigenous Trichoderma spp isolates from Palestine. Hebron Univ Res J 2:27–47
Beever R, Bollard E (1970) The nature of the stimulation of fungal growth by potato extract. Microbiology 60:273–279. https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-60-2-273
Bevivino A, Sarrocco S, Dalmastri C, Tabacchioni S, Cantale C, Chiarini L (1998) Characterization of a free–living maize–rhizosphere population of Burkholderia cepacia: effect of seed treatment on disease suppression and growth promotion of maize. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 27:225–237. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.1998.tb00539.x
Bhagat D, Sharma P, Sirari A, Kumawat K (2014) Screening of Mesorhizobium spp. for control of Fusarium wilt in chickpea in vitro conditions. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci 3:923–930
Bhattacharjee RB, Jourand P, Chaintreuil C, Dreyfus B, Singh A, Mukhopadhyay SN (2012) Indole acetic acid and ACC deaminase–producing Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. trifolii SN10 promote rice growth, and in the process undergo colonization and chemotaxis. Biol Fertil Soils 48:173–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-011-0614-9
Bianchini A, Maringoni AC, Carneiro SMTPG (1997) Common bean diseases. In: Kimati H, Amorim L, Bergamin Filho A, Camargo LEA, Rezende JAM (eds) Manual of phytopathology: diseases of cultivated plants. Agronômica Ceres, São Paulo, pp 376–399
Bianco C, Imperlini E, Calogero R, Senatore B, Amoresano A, Carpentieri A, Pucci P, Defez R (2006) Indole–3–acetic acid improves Escherichia coli’s defences to stress. Arch Microbiol 185:373–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-006-0103-y
Boiero L, Perrig D, Masciarelli O, Penna C, Cassán F, Luna V (2007) Phytohormone production by three strains of Bradyrhizobium japonicum and possible physiological and technological implications. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 74:874–880. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-006-0731-9
Chandra S, Choure K, Dubey RC, Maheshwari DK (2007) Rhizosphere competent Mesorhizobiumloti MP6 induces root hair curling, inhibits Sclerotiniasclerotiorum and enhances growth of Indian mustard (Brassica campestris). Braz J Microbiol 38:124–130. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-83822007000100026
Chen Y, Yan F, Chai Y, Liu H, Kolter R, Losick R, Guo J (2013) Biocontrol of tomato wilt disease by Bacillus subtilis isolates from natural environments depends on conserved genes mediating biofilm formation. J Appl Environ Microbiol 15:848–864. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2012.02860.x
Compant S, Duffy B, Nowak J, Clément C, Barka EA (2005) Use of plant growth-promoting bacteria for biocontrol of plant diseases: principles, mechanisms of action, and future prospects. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:4951–4959. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.9.4951-4959.2005
Dall’Agnol RF, Ribeiro RA, Ormeño-Orrillo E, Rogel MA, JRM D, Andrade DS, Martínez-Romero E, Hungria M (2013) Rhizobium freirei sp nov, a symbiont of Phaseolus vulgaris that is very effective at fixing nitrogen. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 63:4167–4173. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.052928-0
Dar GH, Zargar M, Beigh G (1997) Biocontrol of Fusarium root rot in the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) by using symbiotic Glomus mosseae and Rhizobium leguminosarum. Microb Ecol 34:74–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002489900036
Datta B, Chakrabartty PK (2014) Siderophore biosynthesis genes of Rhizobium sp. isolated from Cicer arietinum. L. 3 Biotech 4:391–401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-013-0164-y
de Jensen CE, Percich J, Graham P (2002) The effect of Bacillus subtilis and Rhizobium inoculation of dry bean seed on root rot severity and yield in Minnesota. Annu Rep Bean Improv Coop 45:98–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-4290(01)00200-3
Edwards U, Rogall T, Blöcker H, Emde M, Böttger EC (1989) Isolation and direct complete nucleotide determination of entire genes. Characterization of a gene coding for 16S ribosomal RNA. Nucleic Acids Res 17:7843–7853. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/17.19.7843
Elbadry M, Taha R, Eldougdoug KA, Gamal-Eldin H (2006) Induction of systemic resistance in faba bean (Vicia faba L.) to bean yellow mosaic potyvirus (BYMV) via seed bacterization with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. J Plant Dis Protect 113:247–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03356189
Fageria N, Melo L, Ferreira E, Oliveira J, Knupp A (2014) Dry matter, grain yield, and yield components of dry bean as influenced by nitrogen fertilization and rhizobia. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 5:111–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2013.848877
Falcão JV, Orili FP, Ávila ZD, Mello SD (2005) Establishment of methodology for contamination of soil with propagules of fungi Sclerotinia sclerotiorum and Sclerotium rolfsii, and expression of disease in soybean. Brasília, Brazil. Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia, Technical announcement no. 135. Available at: http://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/CENARGEN/27926/1/cot135.pdf. Accessed March 2017
FAO, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Statistical databases (2014) Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat. Accessed Nov 2017
Ferreira DF (2011) Sisvar: a computer statistical analysis system. Ciênc Agrotec 35:1039–1042. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-70542011000600001
Fu SF, Wei JY, Chen HW, Liu YY, Lu HY, Chou JY (2015) Indole–3–acetic acid: a widespread physiological code in interactions of fungi with other organisms. Plant Signal Behav 10:e1048052. https://doi.org/10.1080/15592324.2015.1048052
Ganesan S, Kuppusamy RG, Sekar R (2007) Integrated management of stem rot disease (Sclerotium rolfsii) of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) using Rhizobium and Trichoderma harzianum (ITCC–4572). Turk J Agric For 31:103–108
Gholami M, Khakvar R, Niknam G (2014) Introduction of some new endophytic bacteria from Bacillus and Streptomyces genera as successful biocontrol agents against Sclerotium rolfsii. Arch Phytopathol Plant Protect 47:122–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/03235408.2013.805043
Ghosh PK, Kumar De T, Maiti TK (2015) Production and metabolism of indole acetic acid in root nodules and symbiont (Rhizobium undicola) isolated from root nodule of aquatic medicinal legume Neptunia oleracea Lour. J Botany 2015:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/575067
Glick BR (2005) Modulation of plant ethylene levels by the bacterial enzyme ACC deaminase. FEMS Microbiol Lett 251:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.femsle.2005.07.030
Granada CE, Arruda L, Lisboa BB, Passaglia LMP, Vargas LK (2014) Diversity of native rhizobia isolated in South Brazil and their growth promotion effect on white clover (Trifolium repens) and rice (Oryza sativa) plants. Biol Fertil Soils 50:123–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-013-0840-4
Huang H, Erickson R (2007) Effect of seed treatment with Rhizobiumleguminosarum on Pythium damping-off, seedling height, root nodulation, root biomass, shoot biomass, and seed yield of pea and lentil. J Fitopatologi 155:31–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0434.2006.01189.x
Iquebal M, Tomar RS, Parakhia M, Singla D, Jaiswal S, Rathod V, Padhiyar S, Kumar N, Rai A, Kumar D (2017) Draft whole genome sequence of groundnut stem rot fungus Athelia rolfsii revealing genetic architect of its pathogenicity and virulence. Sci Rep 7:5299. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05478-8
Joseph S, David WR (2001) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Gold Spring Harbor, New York
Kacem M, Kazouz F, Merabet C, Rezki M, de Lajudie P, Bekki A (2009) Antimicrobial activity of Rhizobium sp. strains against Pseudomonas savastanoi, the agent responsible for the olive knot disease in Algeria. Grasas Aceites 60:139–146. https://doi.org/10.3989/gya.074808
Kasana RC, Salwan R, Dhar H, Dutt S, Gulati A (2008) A rapid and easy method for the detection of microbial cellulases on agar plates using Gram’s iodine. Curr Microbiol 57:503–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-008-9276-8
Kawasaki ES (1990) PCR protocols – a guide to methods and applications. Academic Press, New York. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-9525(90)90186-A
Kellman AW, Hill GD, McKenzie BA (2005) Variability in nodulation of Phaseolusvulgaris L. with different rhizobial strains. Agronomy New Zealand 35:57–65
Knudsen I, Hockenhull J, Jensen DF, Gerhardson B, Hökeberg M, Tahvonen R, Teperi E, Sundheim L, Henriksen B (1997) Selection of biological control agents for controlling soil and seed–borne diseases in the field. Eur J Plant Pathol 103:775–784. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008662313042
Korir H, Mungai NW, Thuita M, Hamba Y, Masso C (2017) Co–inoculation effect of rhizobia and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on common bean growth in a low phosphorus soil. Front Plant Sci 8:1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00141
Kulkarni GB, Sanjeevkumar S, Kirankumar B, Santoshkumar M, Karegoudar TB (2013) Indole–3–acetic acid biosynthesis in Fusarium delphinoides strain GPK, a causal agent of wilt in chickpea. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 169:1292–1305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-012-0037-6
Kumar GK, Ram MR (2014) Phosphate solubilizing rhizobia isolated from Vigna trilobata. Am J Microbiol Res 2:105–109. https://doi.org/10.12691/ajmr-2-3-4
Kümmerli R, Schiessl KT, Waldvogel T, McNeill K, Ackermann M (2014) Habitat structure and the evolution of diffusible siderophores in bacteria. Ecol Lett 17:1536–1544. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12371
Lindström K, Martinez-Romero M (2005) International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes; subcommittee on the taxonomy of Agrobacterium and Rhizobium. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 55:1383–1383. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.63744-0
López-López A, Rogel MA, Ormeno-Orrillo E, Martínez-Romero J, Martínez-Romero E (2010) Phaseolus vulgaris seed–borne endophytic community with novel bacterial species such as Rhizobium endophyticum sp. nov. Syst Appl Microbiol 33:322–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.syapm.2010.07.005
Mackie A, Wheatley R (1999) Effects and incidence of volatile organic compound interactions between soil bacterial and fungal isolates. Soil Biol Biochem 31:375–385
MacLean AM, Finan TM, Sadowsky MJ (2007) Genomes of the symbiotic nitrogen–fixing bacteria of legumes. Plant Physiol 144:615–622. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.107.101634
Madi L, Katan T, Katan J, Henis Y (1997) Biological control of Sclerotium rolfsii and Verticillium dahliae by Talaromyces flavus is mediated by different mechanisms. Phytopathology 87:1054–1060. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO.1997.87.10.1054
Malusá E, Vassilev N (2014) A contribution to set a legal framework for biofertilisers. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98:6599–6607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-014-5828-y
Manjula K, Kishore GK, Girish A, Singh S (2004) Combined application of Pseudomonas fluorescens and Trichoderma viride has an improved biocontrol activity against stem rot in groundnut. Plant Pathol J 20:75–80. https://doi.org/10.5423/PPJ.2004.20.1.075
Martínez E, Palacios R, Sanchez F (1987) Nitrogen–fixing nodules induced by Agrobacterium tumefaciens harboring Rhizobium phaseoli plasmids. J Bacteriol Mycol 169:2828–2834. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.67.7.3264-3268.2001
Martínez-Romero E, Segovia L, Mercante FM, Franco AA, Graham P, Pardo MA (1991) Rhizobium tropici, a novel species nodulating Phaseolus vulgaris L. beans and Leucaena sp. trees. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 41:417–426. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-41-3-417
Montanhini M, Montanhini R, Pinto J, Bersot L (2013) Effect of temperature on the lipolytic and proteolytic activity of Bacillus cereus isolated from dairy products. Int Food Res J 20:1417–1420
Mordue J, Holliday P (1974) CMI descriptions of pathogenic fungi and bacteria. CMI, Kew
Moulin L, Munive A, Dreyfus B, Boivin-Masson C (2001) Nodulation of legumes by members of the β–subclass of Proteobacteria. Nature 411:948–950. https://doi.org/10.1038/35082070
Nagarajkumar M, Jayaraj J, Muthukrishnan S, Bhaskaran R, Velazhahan R (2005) Detoxification of oxalic acid by Pseudomonas fluorescens strain PfMDU2: implications for the biological control of rice sheath blight caused by Rhizoctonia solani. Am J Microbiol Res 3:291–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2005.02.002
Ormeño-Orrillo E, Menna P, LGP A, Ollero FJ, Nicolás MF, Rodrigues EP, Nakatani AS, JSS B, LMO C, Souza RC (2012) Genomic basis of broad host range and environmental adaptability of Rhizobium tropici CIAT 899 and Rhizobium sp. PRF 81 which are used in inoculants for common bean (Phaseolusvulgaris L.). BMC Genomics 13:1–26. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-13-735
Pang Y, Liu X, Ma Y, Chernin L, Berg G, Gao K (2009) Induction of systemic resistance, root colonisation and biocontrol activities of the rhizospheric strain of Serratia plymuthica are dependent on N–acyl homoserine lactones. Eur J Plant Pathol 124:261–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-008-9411-1
Pelegrin RD, Mercante FM, Otsubo IMN, Otsubo AA (2009) Common bean culture response to nitrogen fertilization and Rhizobium inoculation. Rev Bras Ciênc Solo 33:219–226. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-06832009000100023
Pezet R, Pont V, Hoang-Van K (1992) Enzymatic detoxication of stilbenes by Botrytis cinerea and inhibition by grape berries proanthrocyanidins. In: Verhoeff K, Malathrakis NE, Williamson B (eds) Recent advances in Botrytis research. Pudoc Scientific, Wageningen, pp 87–92
Pii Y, Crimi M, Cremonese G, Spena A, Pandolfini T (2007) Auxin and nitric oxide control indeterminate nodule formation. BMC Plant Biol 7:21. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-7-21
Punja ZK, Grogan R (1981) Eruptive germination of sclerotia of Sclerotium rolfsii. Phytopathology 71:1092–1099. https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-71-1092
Qurashi AW, Sabri AN (2012) Bacterial exopolysaccharide and biofilm formation stimulate chickpea growth and soil aggregation under salt stress. Braz J Microbiol 43:1183–1191. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-838220120003000046
Ramírez-Bahena MH, Vial L, Lassalle F, Diel B, Chapulliot D, Daubin V, Nesme X, Muller D (2014) Single acquisition of protelomerase gave rise to speciation of a large and diverse clade within the Agrobacterium/Rhizobium supercluster characterized by the presence of a linear chromid. Mol Phylogenet Evol 73:202–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2014.01.005
Ribeiro RA, Ormeno-Orrillo E, Dall'Agnol RF, Graham PH, Martinez-Romero E, Hungria M (2013) Novel Rhizobium lineages isolated from root nodules of the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L) in Andean and Mesoamerican areas. Res Microbiol 164:740–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resmic.2013.05.002
Robleto EA, Borneman J, Triplett EW (1998) Effects of bacterial antibiotic production on rhizosphere microbial communities from a culture-independent perspective. Appl Environ Microbiol 64:5020–5022
Rodriguez-Kabana R, Kelley W, Curl E (1978) Proteolytic activity of Trichoderma viride in mixed culture with Sclerotium rolfsii in soil. Can J Microbiol 24:487–490. https://doi.org/10.1139/m78-079
Roy N, Chakrabartty PK (2000) Effect of aluminum on the production of siderophore by Rhizobium sp. (Cicer arietinum). Curr Microbiol 41:5–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002840010082
Sabet K, Mostafa M, EI-Shenawy SA (1998) Biological control of broad bean damping–off disease caused by four sclerotia forming fungi. Egypt J Phytopathol 26:109–119
Schilperoort R, Klapwijk P, Ooms G, Wullems G (1980) Plant tumours caused by bacterial plasmids: crown gall genetic origins of tumor cells. Springer. pp 87–108. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8823-1_6
Schlindwein G, Vargas LK, Lisboa BB, Azambuja AC, Granada CE, Gabiatti NC, Prates F, Stumpf R (2008) Influence of rhizobial inoculation on seedling vigor and germination of lettuce. Ciênc Rural 38:658–664. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84782008000300010
Schwyn B, Neilands J (1987) Universal chemical assay for the detection and determination of siderophores. Anal Biochem 160:47–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(87)90612-9
Shaban W, El-Bramawy M (2011) Impact of dual inoculation with Rhizobium and Trichoderma on damping off, root rot diseases and plant growth parameters of some legumes field crop under greenhouse conditions. IRJAS 1:98–108
Shehata HR, Lyons EM, Jordan KS, Raizada MN (2016) Relevance of in vitro agar based screens to characterize the anti–fungal activities of bacterial endophyte communities. BMC Microbiol 16:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-016-0623-9
Soares ALL, Ferreira PA, Pereira JPAR, Vale HMM, Lima AS, Andrade MJB, Moreira FMS (2006) Agronomic efficiency of selected rhizobia and diversity of native noduliferous populations in Perdões. Rev Bras Ciênc Solo 30:803–811. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-06832010000400011
Somasegaran P, Hoben HJ (2012) Handbook for rhizobia: methods in legume–rhizobium technology. Springer-Verlag, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8375-8
Stackebrandt E, Liesack W (1993) Nucleic acids and classification. In: Goodfellow M, O’Donnell AG (eds) Handbook of new bacterial systematics. Academic Press, Cambridge, pp 152–189
Trujillo ME, Willems A, Abril A, Planchuelo AM, Rivas R, Ludeña D, Mateos PF, Martínez-Molina E, Velázquez E (2006) Nodulation of Lupinus albus by strains of Ochrobactrum lupini sp nov. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:1318–1327. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.3.1318-1327.2005
Vargas LK, Lisboa BB, Schlindwein G, Granada CE, Giongo A, Beneduzi A, Passaglia LMP (2009) Occurrence of plant growth–promoting traits in clover–nodulating rhizobia strains isolated from different soils in Rio Grande do Sul state. Rev Bras Ciênc Solo 33:1227–1235. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-06832009000500016
Vargas LK, Volpiano CG, Lisboa BB, Giongo A, Beneduzi A, Passaglia LMP (2017) Potential of rhizobia as plant growth–promoting rhizobacteria. In: Khan MS, Zaide A, Musarrat J (eds) Microbes for legume improvement. Springer, Berlin, pp 153–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59174-2_7
Visca PAOLO, Colotti G, Serino L, Verzili D, Orsi N, Chiancone E (1992) Metal regulation of siderophore synthesis in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and functional effects of siderophore–metal complexes. Appl Environ Microbiol 58:2886–2893
Wheatley R (2002) The consequences of volatile organic compound mediated bacterial and fungal interactions. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 81:357–364. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020592802234
Yanni YG, Rizk RY, El-Fattah FKA, Squartini A, Corich V, Giacomini A, de Bruijn F, Rademaker J, Maya-Flores J, Ostrom P (2001) The beneficial plant growth–promoting association of Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. trifolii with rice roots. Funct Plant Biol 28:845–870. https://doi.org/10.1071/PP01069
Yoon SH, Ha SM, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y, Seo H, Chun J (2017) Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole–genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 67:1613–1617. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.001755
Young J, Kuykendall L, Martinez-Romero E, Kerr A, Sawada H (2001) A revision of Rhizobium Frank 1889, with an emended description of the genus, and the inclusion of all species of Agrobacterium Conn 1942 and Allorhizobium undicola de Lajudie et al., 1998 as new combinations: Rhizobium radiobacter, R. rhizogenes, R. rubi, R. undicola and R. vitis. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 51:89–103. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-51-1-89
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by grants from the CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico) and FAPERGS (Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul) foundations (Brazil).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Ulrike Mathesius.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(PDF 923 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Volpiano, C.G., Lisboa, B.B., São José, J.F.B. et al. Rhizobium strains in the biological control of the phytopathogenic fungi Sclerotium (Athelia) rolfsii on the common bean. Plant Soil 432, 229–243 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-018-3799-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-018-3799-y