Abstract
Background
Phosphorus utilization efficiency is very low in soil due to its low solubility and mobility. Legumes have been shown to increase P uptake of the following wheat, but the underlying mechanisms of this effect are unclear.
Materials and methods
Using three soils with low P availability differing in pH and therefore predominant P form: Mount Bold (pH 4.8), Monarto (pH 7.5) and Langhorne Creek pH 8.8), a rotation of faba bean, white lupin and wheat and unplanted soil in phase 1 and wheat in phase 2 was grown. To distinguish between the pre-crop effect and the residue effect, the residues from the pre-crops in phase 1 were either returned to the pre-crop soil or added to the previously unplanted soil. In the rhizosphere of wheat, P fractions were determined and the community composition of bacteria, fungi, P mobilizers (ALP gene), ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB) and archaea (AOA) were analyzed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) – denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE).
Results
There were no differences in wheat root and shoot biomass among treatments in the acidic Mount Bold soil, but in both the alkaline Langhorne Creek and neutral Monarto soils, wheat shoot biomass was highest in wheat and white lupin pre-crop soils. The alkaline Langhorne Creek soil had the highest concentrations of HCl P, whereas NaOH I Pi, NaOH I Po, NaOH II Pi, residual P and total P were highest in the acidic Mount Bold soil. In the soil with residues, the presence of plants in phase 1 of the rotation increased the concentrations of labile P pools and the NaOH extractable P pools in the rhizosphere of wheat compared to wheat grown in the previously unplanted soil, with the increase occurring in both inorganic and organic P fractions. As the amount of residues added in the soil was only 1 g kg-1, the effect of the residues alone on soil P pools was relatively small. The community composition of all microbial groups investigated differed among soils and within one soil by the pre-crop. Among the pre-crops, white lupin had a negative effect on AMF colonization although resin P concentrations were not higher than in the other pre-crop treatments.
Conclusions
Soil P pools and microbial community composition were predominantly affected by soil pH and within a given soil by the pre-crop treatment whereas the residue effect was small. The finding that in two of the soils the presence of plants in phase 1 of the rotation increased P uptake by 6 week-old wheat but also increased the concentrations of labile P pools and the NaOH extractable P pools in the rhizosphere of wheat suggests that pre-crops may enhance P uptake by wheat also in the later stages of growth.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Phosphorus is the second most limiting nutrient for crops and often addition of P fertilizer is essential to maintain crop yields. However, the amount of P fertilizer which is taken up in the year of application is relatively low, i.e. only 10-15 %, thus leading to P accumulation in soil and potentially environmental pollution (Borda et al. 2011). Additionally, P fertilizers are produced from phosphate rock which is a non-renewable limited resource (IFA 2010). Thus, it is important to improve P management by enhancing soil P availability and utilization efficiency. Phosphorus acquisition efficiency is enhanced, for example by increasing root length, density, surface area (Li et al. 2009; Shimizu et al. 2004) or changing root distribution and root architecture (Lynch 1995; Lynch and Brown 2001). In the rhizosphere, exudates from roots and microbes enhance P mobilization, including organic anions (Wang et al. 2007), phytase (Richardson et al. 2000; Starnes et al. 2008) and phosphatase (George et al. 2008; Li et al. 2004; Sen and Mukherji 2004). In rotations, legumes are used to increase N availability to the following cereals. Additionally, some legumes (e.g. faba bean, white lupin, pigeon pea) have a higher ability than cereals to mobilize poorly soluble P (Ae et al. 1990; Li et al. 2003). Previous studies have shown higher P uptake of cereals following faba bean and white lupin (Nuruzzaman et al. 2005), or intercropped with pigeon pea (Ae et al. 1990), white lupin (Cu et al. 2005), chickpea (Li et al. 2003, 2004) and faba bean (Hinsinger et al. 2011; Li et al. 2007). There are several hypotheses or potential mechanisms explaining the positive effect of legumes on P uptake by cereals, including (1) exudation of carboxylates by legumes (Wang et al. 2007) which compete with phosphate for binding sites in the soil, (2) acidification (Zhu et al. 2005) or alkalinization (Bagayoko et al. 2000; Rose et al. 2010) which increases the solubility of P salts, (3) different P pools used by legumes and cereals, or legumes increasing the concentration of the labile P pools, and (4) P release from residues (Ha et al. 2007) or soil P mobilization by carboxylates produced during decomposition (Iyamuremye et al. 1996). Of these mechanisms, the first two have been studied extensively whereas less is known about the third and fourth mechanisms. Further, it is not clear how important the effect of residues is compared to that of the pre-crop alone.
Soil pH affects the predominant forms of P which, in turn are mobilized by different mechanisms. In acidic soils, Fe and Al phosphates as well as P bound to Fe and Al oxides dominate that can be mobilized by organic anions by chelating metals and ligand exchange, whereas the Ca-bound phosphates dominating in alkaline soils are mainly mobilized by acidification (Hinsinger 2001; Lindsay 1979). In a previous study with the same soils as used here, faba bean, white lupin and wheat were grown in monoculture or in mixed culture of wheat with legumes (Wang et al. 2011, in press), Plant growth and rhizosphere microbial community composition and soil P pools were predominately affected by soil type whereas the cropping system (monoculture versus mixed culture) had little effect. In that study, wheat and legumes depleted less labile inorganic P whereas less labile organic P only accumulated in the rhizosphere of the legumes (for a definition of less labile P, see below in the Materials and Methods section).
The aim of this rotation study was to assess the relative importance of soil pH, residues and pre-crops on the growth and rhizosphere properties of the following wheat. In a glasshouse study, three soils with low available P concentration differing in pH (4.8, 7.5 and 8.8) were used. In phase 1 of the rotation, faba bean, white lupin and wheat were grown, and unplanted soil was kept under the same conditions. Then in phase 2, wheat was grown in pre-crop soil mixed with the respective residue or in previously unplanted soil mixed with residues from faba bean, white lupin and wheat or without residues.
Materials and methods
Experimental design
The soils used in this study were collected from three locations in South Australia: Mount Bold (acidic, 38 °11′S and 138 °69′E), Monarto (neutral, 35 °50′S and 139 °60′E), and Langhorne Creek (alkaline, 35 °16′S and 139 °9′E) (Table 1).
For the first phase of the rotation (pre-crop phase), the soils were amended with basal nutrients (g kg-1 soil): K2SO4 0.17, MgSO4 0.19, and with micronutrients (mg kg-1 soil) FeNaEDTA 0.4, CuSO4·5H2O 2.0, MnSO4·4H2O 0.6, CoCl2·6H2O 0.4, H3BO3 0.5, Na2MoO4·2H2O 0.5, and ZnSO4·7H2O 2.2 (Li et al. 2011) and with 10 mg P kg-1 as KH2PO4 . Nitrogen was added to wheat at 150 mg N kg-1 as (NH4)2SO4; this N rate was chosen to ensure that N was not limiting wheat growth. The legumes were grown without nitrogen addition and inoculated with the appropriate Rhizobium strain: strain WU425 (group G) for white lupin, strain WSM1455 (group F) for faba bean. Pre-germinated seeds of white lupin (Lupinus albus L. cv. Luxor) (L), faba bean (Vicia faba L. cv. Fiesta) (F) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Krichauff) (W) were planted and later thinned to 2 plants per pot with 4 replicates. Wheat was planted 2 weeks after the legumes because of the more rapid development of wheat. Additionally, there were 16 pots per soil without plants in this phase which received the basal nutrients without P and N. The plants were harvested 8 weeks after sowing of the legumes at which time legumes and wheat were in the early flowering stage. The roots of the pre-crops were carefully removed from the soil which was then air-dried to mimic the conditions in the field in Southern Australia where soils often dry out during the hot and dry summer before the following crop is planted after the onset of the autumn rains.
The root and shoot residues were dried at 40°C, cut to about 2 cm and then mixed into the soil previously cropped with legumes or wheat (pre-crop soil: F + RF, L + RL, W + RW) or the previously unplanted soil (U + RF, U + RL, U + RW) at a rate of 1 g kg-1. The soils were filled into 1 kg pots, adjusted to 70 % WHC and planted with germinated seeds of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Krichauff). Additionally there were 4 pots of previously unplanted soil without residues which were left unplanted (UP no wheat) and 4 pots of previously unplanted soil without residues planted with wheat (UP)(for the treatments see Table 2). No nutrients were added in the second phase of the rotation. The wheat was thinned to 2 plants per pot and grown for 6 weeks.
The soil was maintained at 70 % water holding capacity throughout phases 1 and 2 by adjusting the weight of the pots with water every 1-2 days. Six weeks after planting, the roots of wheat were carefully removed from the soil. After shaking off the loosely adhering soil, the tightly adhering rhizosphere soil was collected with a brush and stored at -20°C for DNA extraction and at 4°C for the other analyses. Storage at 4°C was used because freezing and thawing may induce changes in nutrient availability (Feng et al. 2007).
Soil texture was determined as described by Bowman and Hutka (2002) and the soils classified according to the USDA classification system. The total organic C (TOC) concentration was determined by wet oxidation and titration (Walkley and Black 1934). The water holding capacity was determined after Wilke (2005).
Plant analysis
The shoots and roots were oven-dried at 70°C for 2 days and ground for plant N and P analysis. The N concentration was determined using the Kjeldahl method (Bradstreet 1965) and the N concentration was measured colorimetrically (Bremner 1965). The P concentration was determined after digestion in a mixture of nitric acid and perchloric acid (6:1) (Kuo 1996).
Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) colonization
Arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization was assessed only in wheat in phase 2 of the rotation. Subsamples of wheat roots (~0.2 g) were cut to approximately 1 cm length before clearing in KOH 10 % for 3 days at room temperature and then stained as described in Vierheilig et al. (1998). Stained roots were assessed for AM colonization using the gridline intersection method (Brundrett et al. 1996; Giovannetti and Mosse 1980) under a dissecting microscope at 40 Χ magnification.
Soil pH, ammonium, nitrate and nitrification potential activity (PNA) and microbial biomass
Soil pH was measured using 2 g soil at a 1:5 soil-water ratio in rhizosphere and unplanted soil.
Nitrate and ammonium were extracted from the bulk soil by horizontal shaking with 2 M KCl (1:10) for 1 h and determined by the cadmium reduction method for nitrate (Henrikson and Selmer-Olsen 1970) and with nitroprusside/dichloro-S-triazine for ammonium (Searle 1984). Potential nitrification activity (PNA) was determined by the shaken soil slurry method as described previously (Shen et al. 2008) without potassium chlorate. Chloroform-labile C as a measure of soil microbial biomass carbon was measured by the fumigation-extraction method (Joergensen and Brookes 1990) except 4 g soil and 16 ml 0.5 M K2SO4 extractant were used.
Soil DNA extraction and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) analysis
Soil DNA was extracted from 0.5 g rhizosphere soil using the Ultraclean® Soil DNA Isolation Kit (MOBIO) according to the manufacturer’s protocol except for the initial step which was bead beating at 5.5 m s-1 for 40 s. The purified DNA was diluted with 50 μl sterilized water.
The PCR was performed with 1 Χ PCR buffer without MgCl2 (QIAGEN), 2.0 mM MgCl2 (QIAGEN), 0.5 μl dNTP mix (10 mM of each) (QIAGEN), 6 pmol of each primer, 0.2 μl Taq DNA polymerase (5 unit μl-1) (QIAGEN), 1 μl 10 times diluted soil DNA, and water to the final volume of 25 μl. The primers used and thermal profiles are given in Table 3.
Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of the PCR products was performed with the DCode Universal Mutation Detection System (Bio-Rad Laboratories). The PCR products of bacteria, fungi, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) genes, nitrogen fixing (nifH) genes, ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB) and ammonia-oxidizing archaea (AOA) were loaded onto polyacrylamide gels with a denaturing gradient (100 % denaturant contains 42 g urea and 40 ml formamide in 100 ml) as shown in Table 3. Electrophoreses were run at 80 V for 16 h in 1 Χ TAE. The gels were stained with 0.001 % SYBR Gold (Invitrogen) for 45 min, visualized under blue light, and digitized by the software Quantity One (Bio-Rad Laboratories).
Soil P fractionation
Soil P fractions were determined in phase 2 of the rotation in the rhizosphere of wheat and the unplanted soil based on the method described by Condron and Goh (1989) and Tiessen and Moir (1993) with slight modifications. One g soil was shaken with 15 ml water and an anion exchange (#55164, BDH Chemicals, Poole, England) strip (3 Χ 2 cm) for 16 h; another aliquot was amended with 1 ml hexanol to extract microbial P (Kouno et al. 1995). A conversion factor of 0.4 was used to calculate microbial biomass P from the difference between hexanol-labile P and resin P (Kouno et al. 1995). The soil treated with hexanol (after removal of microbial biomass P) was further sequentially extracted with 30 ml of 0.5 M NaHCO3, 0.1 M NaOH, 1 M HCl, 0.1 M NaOH and 15 ml concentrated HCl; the remaining soil was used to determine residual P. The second extraction with NaOH was carried out because Condron and Goh (1989) suggested that substantial amounts of P were released by NaOH after removal of the 1 M HCl soluble P. In all fractions, inorganic P was determined colorimetrically using the method described by Murphy and Riley (1962). Organic P was determined in the 0.5 M NaHCO3, 0.1 M NaOH, 0.1 M NaOH, concentrated HCl fractions by persulfate oxidation. The concentration of organic P was calculated as the difference between total P in the extract treated with persulfate and inorganic P (Tiessen and Moir 1993). Soil total P and residual P were measured after digestion in a mixture of nitric acid and perchloric acid (6:1) (Kuo 1996).
Statistical analysis
Two-way analysis of variance was performed using Genstat (GenStat® for Windows10.0, VSN Int. Ltd, UK, 2005). With a few exceptions (see below for details), the main effects (soil pH and treatment) as well as their interaction was significant at P ≤ 0.05. The least significant difference in tables and figures refers to the interaction term. Statements in the text about differences among treatments refer to significant differences (P ≤ 0.05).
Microbial community composition based on the digitized DGGE profiles was analyzed with Primer E software (Primer-E Ltd, Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Plymouth, UK). Non-metric multidimensional (MDS) scaling based on band position and peak height was used to plot the DGGE profiles. Unlike principle component analysis plots, MDS plots do not have axis units or labels. The 2D stress indicates how well the plot represents the variability in the data with a 2D stress <0.2 considered to represent a good reflection of the resemblance matrix (Clarke and Warwick 2001). Significant differences in microbial community composition between treatments were determined by PERMANOVA (Primer-E Ltd, Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Plymouth, UK).
Results
Pre-crops
The shoot and root biomass of the pre-crops was greatest in faba bean and smallest in wheat (Table 4). Total N in the residues was greatest in white lupin and smallest in wheat whereas total P was lowest in white lupin residues (Table 4). Correspondingly, the amount of N added with the residues was highest in white lupin and lowest in wheat.
Wheat biomass, N and P uptake
The shoot biomass of wheat was greater in the neutral Monarto and alkaline Langhorne creek soil than in the acidic Mount Bold soil (Fig. 1a). In the alkaline Langhorne Creek soil, shoot biomass was greater in previously cropped soil than in previously unplanted soil. This was also the case in the neutral Monarto soil for the pre-crops white lupin and wheat but not for faba bean. In these two soils, addition of residues to previously unplanted soil did not increase wheat growth compared to the unplanted and un-amended soils. The shoot dry weight was similar in all treatments in the acidic Mount Bold soil. The root dry weight ranged between 0.1 and 0.5 g pot-1 and was lower in the acidic Mount Bold soil than in the other two soils (data not shown).
Addition of residues to previously unplanted soil did not increase wheat shoot P concentration in any of the soils (Fig. 1b). But faba bean pre-crop (in the alkaline Langhorne Creek and neutral Monarto soil) and white lupin pre-crop (in the neutral Monarto soil) increased wheat shoot P concentrations. In the acidic Mount Bold soil, shoot P concentration was highest in the previously unplanted soil without residues and the faba bean pre-crop soil and lowest in wheat pre-crop soil. Shoot P uptake showed a similar trend as shoot biomass in the alkaline Langhorne Creek and the neutral Monarto soil whereas in the acidic Mount Bold soil shoot P uptake was highest in previously unplanted soil without residues or with wheat residues and in faba bean pre-crop soil (Fig. 1c).
In the alkaline Langhorne Creek and neutral Monarto soils, wheat shoot N concentration was generally higher with residue addition alone than in pre-crop soils, whereas the reverse was true for shoot N uptake which was highest in wheat pre-crop soil and lowest in faba bean pre-crop soil (Fig. 1d). However, there were no differences among treatments in shoot N concentration and N uptake in the acidic Mount Bold soil (Fig. 1e).
AMF colonization
The AMF colonization of the wheat roots ranged between 16 and 57 % and did not differ among soils (Fig. 1f). In the neutral Langhorne Creek and the acidic Mount Bold soil, AMF colonization was highest in previously unplanted soil and in all soils it was lowest in white lupin pre-crop soil. In all soils, AMF colonization was negatively correlated with resin P: r = -0.42, -0.75, -0.50 (P < 0.05), for the neutral Monarto soil, the alkaline Langhorne creek soil and the acidic Mount Bold soil, respectively.
Soil biochemical properties in the rhizosphere of wheat
The pH in the rhizosphere of wheat showed the same trends as in the original soils, being highest in the alkaline Langhorne Creek soil and lowest in acidic Mount Bold soil (data not shown). In all three soils it was lowest in the rhizosphere of wheat after wheat pre-crop and generally lower in previously cropped soil compared to previously unplanted soil.
The ammonium and particularly the nitrate concentrations were higher in the acidic Mount Bold soil than in the other two soils (Fig. 2a, b). In the neutral Langhorne Creek soil, the ammonium and nitrate concentrations did not differ among treatments. In the neutral Monarto soil, the ammonium concentration was highest in faba bean pre-crop soil whereas the nitrate concentration was highest in the previously unplanted soil with residues. In acidic Mount Bold soil, ammonium and nitrate concentrations were highest in wheat pre-crop soil.
The potential nitrification activity (PNA) was highest in wheat pre-crop soil and lowest in previously unplanted soil in Monarto and Langhorne Creek soils (Fig. 2c), whereas in Mount Bold it was highest in white lupin pre-crop soil. The PNA was negatively correlated with soil nitrate concentration only in the neutral Monarto soil (r = -0.55, P < 0.01).
The chloroform-labile C concentration was highest in the acidic Mount Bold soil (Fig. 2d). In the alkaline Langhorne Creek and the neutral Monarto soil, it was highest in the previously unplanted soil without residues whereas in the acidic Mt Bold soil, it was lowest in the previously unplanted soil and the white lupin pre-crop soil and highest in the wheat pre-crop soil. In general, residue addition had no significant effect on the chloroform-labile C concentration.
Microbial community composition
The community composition of ammonium-oxidizing archaea (AOA) and nifH differed among the three soils (Fig. 3, Table 5), while the community composition of bacteria and fungi only differed between the acidic Mount Bold soil on the one side and the neutral Monarto and the alkaline Langhorne Creek soils on the other. The community composition of the ammonium-oxidizing bacteria (AOB) in the neutral Monarto soil was different from that in the alkaline Langhorne Creek soil (AOB could not be amplified in the acidic Mount Bold soil).
Based on the PERMANOVA results, the community composition of the investigated microbial groups in all three soils differed between the soil without wheat and the rhizosphere soil (Fig. 3, Table 5). Residue addition or pre-crop had little effect on community composition with a few exceptions. The ALP gene composition differed between wheat grown in faba bean pre-crop soil and wheat grown in wheat pre-crop soil. In the alkaline Langhorne Creek and the neutral Monarto soil, the nifH community was different in faba bean and white lupin pre-crop soil compared to wheat pre-crop soil and previously unplanted soil with or without residues. In the acidic Mount Bold soil on the other hand, the nifH community composition in the pre-crop soil was different from that in previously unplanted soil with residues. Additionally, the nifH community in previously unplanted soil without residues or with wheat residues differed from that with legume residues. In the alkaline Langhorne Creek soil, the AOB community composition was affected by pre-crops with legumes differing from wheat and by residue addition; wheat residue addition resulting in a different community composition than the legume residues. In the neutral Monarto soil, the AOA community composition in legume pre-crop soil was different from that in previously unplanted soil with or without residues.
Soil P pools in the rhizosphere of wheat
In the alkaline Langhorne creek soil, the concentrations of NaHCO3 Pi and HCl Pi were higher than in the rhizosphere of wheat grown in the neutral Monarto and the acidic Mount Bold soil, whereas the concentrations of NaHCO3 Po, NaOH I Pi, NaOH I Po, residual P and total P were higher in the acidic Mount Bold soil than the other two soils (Fig. 4, only showing P pools with significant soil x treatment interactions). The concentrations of the labile resin P and NaHCO3 P, as well as of the less labile NaOH I P were generally higher in wheat grown in the pre-crop soils compared to wheat grown in the previously unplanted soil.
In the alkaline Langhorne Creek and the neutral Monarto soil, the resin P concentration was highest in the rhizosphere of wheat grown in faba bean pre-crop soil and lowest in wheat grown previously unplanted soil without residues (Fig. 4a). Residue addition to the previously unplanted soil decreased resin P. In the acidic Mount Bold soil, the resin P concentration was lowest in wheat grown in the previously unplanted soil and highest in wheat grown in wheat pre-crop soil.
In the alkaline Langhorne Creek and the neutral Monarto soil, microbial P was lowest in the rhizosphere of wheat grown in previously unplanted soil without residues and the soil without wheat plants and highest in wheat grown in white lupin pre-crop soil (Fig. 4b). Residue addition to the previously unplanted soil and pre-crop soils increased microbial P. In the acidic Mount Bold soil, microbial P was generally higher in wheat grown in the previously unplanted soil with residues than that in wheat grown in pre-crop soils with residues and wheat grown in previously unplanted soil without residues, except for faba bean pre-crop soil.
The concentrations of NaHCO3 Pi and NaOH I Pi in the rhizosphere of wheat were not affected by residue addition to previously unplanted soil in the three soils (Fig. 4c, e). Among the pre-crops, the concentration of NaHCO3 Pi was highest in wheat grown in faba bean pre-crop soil in neutral Monarto soil, but highest in wheat grown in wheat pre-crop soil in the acidic Mount Bold soil (Fig. 4c). In the alkaline Langhorne Creek soil, the NaHCO3-Po concentration was lower in wheat grown in the wheat pre-crop soil than in the other pre-crop soils (Fig. 4d). This was also true for the NaOH I Po concentration in the acidic Mount Bold soil (Fig. 4f).
The concentration of HCl Pi in the alkaline Langhorne Creek soil was highest in previously unplanted soil without wheat plants and lowest in wheat grown in previously unplanted soil with wheat residues. In the neutral Monarto and the acidic Mount Bold soil, the concentration of HCl Pi was similar in all treatments (Fig. 4g).
The concentration of residual P in the alkaline Langhorne Creek soil was lowest in wheat grown in the faba bean treatments (faba bean residues in previously unplanted soil or faba bean pre-crop) (Fig. 4h). In the neutral Monarto soil, residual P was lower in wheat grown in pre-crop soils compared to wheat grown in previously unplanted soil and was lowest in white lupin pre-crop soil. In the acidic Mount Bold soil on the other hand, wheat grown in pre-crop soils had a higher concentration of residual P than wheat grown in the previously unplanted soil.
The concentrations of the NaOH II and concentrated HCl P pools differed only among soils (data not shown). Whereas the concentration of NaOH II Pi was higher in the acidic Mount Bold soil than in the other two soils, the concentration of NaOH Po was highest in the alkaline Langhorne Creek soil. The concentration of concentrated HCl Pi was highest in the neutral Monarto and lowest in the alkaline Langhorne Creek soil whereas the concentration of concentrated HCl Po was highest in the alkaline Langhorne Creek soil and lowest in the acidic Mount Bold soil.
Discussion
This study showed that wheat growth and P uptake as well as rhizosphere P pools and microbial community composition are affected mainly by soil type but also by pre-crops and their residues with residue addition to previously unplanted soil generally having little effect.
Wheat growth and P uptake
Wheat shoot and root biomass were highest in the alkaline Langhorne Creek soil and lowest in the acidic Mount Bold soil. This can be explained by the higher potentially available P (resin P and NaHCO3 Pi) in the alkaline Langhorne Creek soil than the other two soils. There were no differences in root and shoot biomass among treatments in the acidic Mount Bold soil, but in both the alkaline Langhorne Creek and the neutral Monarto soil, shoot biomass was highest in wheat grown in wheat and white lupin pre-crop soils which may be due to the higher concentrations of potentially available P pools (resin P, NaHCO3) in these treatments. Wheat shoot P concentration was highest when grown in faba bean pre-crop soil in all three soils. This is in agreement with previous studies in which wheat after faba bean had a higher P concentration compared to wheat after other legumes and wheat pre-crops (Nuruzzaman et al. 2005). However, the high shoot P concentration is most likely a consequence of the poor growth of wheat in faba bean pre-crop soil indicating that another factor is limiting wheat growth, for example compounds released during faba bean residue decomposition that inhibit wheat growth.
Differences in soil P pools among soils
The soils differed in concentrations of the various P pools. The alkaline Langhorne Creek soil had the highest concentrations of HCl P whereas the concentrations of NaOH I Pi + Po, NaOH II Pi, residual P and total P were highest in the acidic Mount Bold soil. This can be explained by the differences in pH among the soils, as P bound to Fe and Al oxides (NaOH P) is dominant in acidic soils and Ca bound phosphates (HCl P) are dominant in alkaline soils (Frossard et al. 1995; Hinsinger 2001; Lindsay 1979). However, there were also some differences between soils which can not be explained by pH, such as the higher concentrations of NaOH II Po in the neutral Langhorne Creek soil and of concentrated HCl Pi in the acidic Mount Bold soil. This might be due to differential soil parent material which affects soil Al, Fe, Ca concentrations (Renneson et al. 2010) or soil texture which may affect transfer of P between pools (Chardon and Schoumans 2007; Renneson et al. 2010).
In the alkaline Langhorne Creek and neutral Monarto soil, the presence of wheat plants and residue addition increased soil microbial P which can be explained by the easily available C released into the rhizosphere (Marschner et al. 2006) and from residues (Saffigna et al. 1989). On the other hand, there was no rhizosphere or residue effect on microbial P in the acidic Mount Bold soil. The high soil organic matter content in this soil may have provided sufficient C to over-ride a rhizosphere effect. This interpretation is supported by the high concentration of chloroform-labile C in the Mount Bold soil.
The small amount of residues added was (1 g kg-1) can explain the small effect of the residues alone on soil P pools. Despite the low addition rate, the decrease in resin P and the corresponding increase in microbial P shows that P was immobilized which can be explained by their total P concentration which varied from 1.3 to 1.7 g kg-1. This is below 2-3 g kg-1 which was the threshold for P immobilization in a previous study (Yadvinder-Singh and Khind 1992).
In the soil with residues, the presence of plants in phase 1 of the rotation increased the concentrations of labile P pools and the NaOH extractable P pools in the rhizosphere of the following wheat compared to the previously unplanted soil with the increase occurring in both inorganic and organic P fractions which could be due to mobilization of P during the pre-crop phase. In the alkaline Langhorne Creek and the neutral Monarto soil, labile P accumulated in the rhizosphere although the plants grew better and took up more P in pre-crop soil compared to previously unplanted soil. This indicates that more P was mobilized than was required by the wheat.
The finding that pre-crops not only increased the inorganic but also the organic P fractions of the NaHCO3 and NaOH pools suggests conversion of inorganic into organic P by soil microbes stimulated by root exudates and dead roots (Rangel-Castro et al. 2005). The origin of the increased P concentrations in the NaHCO3 and NaOH pools appears to differ among soils. In the alkaline Langhorne Creek soil, the lower concentration of HCl Pi in pre-crop soil suggests that P from this pool was converted into the NaHCO3 and NaOH pools. In the neutral Monarto soil, the source of the increased P concentrations in the NaHCO3 and NaOH pools appears to be residual P as this P pool was lower in pre-crop soil compared to previously unplanted soil. However in the acidic Mount Bold soil, neither HCl P nor residual P were lower in pre-crop soil. Therefore it is not clear where the increased P concentration in the NaHCO3 and NaOH pools originated in this soil.
In a previous study with the same soils in which faba bean, white lupin and wheat were grown in monoculture or in mixed culture of wheat with legumes (Wang et al. 2011, in press), plant growth and rhizosphere microbial community composition and soil P pools were also predominately affected by soil type whereas the cropping system (monoculture versus mixed culture) had little effect. In that study, wheat and legumes depleted less labile inorganic P whereas less labile organic P accumulated in the rhizosphere of the legumes. In the present study, both labile and non-labile P pools accumulated in the rhizosphere of wheat in phase 2 and there were little differences in P pools among the soils from different pre-crops. Thus, the differential depletion or accumulation of inorganic and organic P pools between legumes and wheat does not have a strong effect on the concentrations of P pools in the rhizosphere of the following wheat.
Mycorrhizal colonization
Mycorrhizal hyphae can increase the soil volume accessible to plants and thereby increase plant P uptake (Smith et al. 2001). In the present study, AMF colonization of wheat ranged from 16 % to 57 % and was similar in all soils. In accordance with previous studies, AMF colonization of wheat was negatively correlated with soil available P (Jensen and Jakobsen 1980). However, among the pre-crops, white lupin had the strongest negative effect on AMF colonization although resin P concentrations were not higher than in the other pre-crop soils. This may be due to the fact that white lupin is considered to be a non-mycorrhizal plant (Keerthisinghe et al. 1998). Negative effects of non-mycorrhizal crops on the colonization of the following crop have been reported before (Haymann et al. 1975; Powell 1982). Compared to soil without residues, decreased AMF colonization of wheat was found with addition of faba bean residues in the alkaline Langhorne Creek and the acidic Mount Bold soil and of white lupin residues in the acidic Mount Bold soil. In a previous study, Hasbullah and McNeill (2011) also found negative effects of legume residues on AMF colonization of wheat which was not related to available P concentrations.
Conclusion
This study showed that the main factor affecting wheat growth, soil P pools and microbial community composition was the soil pH. Within a given soil, legume pre-crops also influenced wheat growth and soil P pools, but their effect varied with soil type. In general, pre-crops increased the concentrations of labile and non-labile P pools in the rhizosphere of the following wheat and stimulated wheat growth and P uptake. The elevated concentrations of labile P in the rhizosphere after 6 weeks suggest that pre-crops may also provide P for wheat in the later stages of growth, but this would have to be tested by growing wheat in phase 2 to maturity. Addition of residues alone had little effect on soil P pools or wheat growth which may be related to the low addition rates used here. However, the negative effect of some residues even at these low rates suggest that adding more residues could reduce wheat growth despite supplying more P.
This results further suggests that studying soil P pools is unlikely to provide clear explanations of the effect of the pre-crops on P uptake by wheat across soil types. In terms of management to enhance P availability to cereals, the optimal rotation is soil pH-dependent with white lupin and wheat being more effective than faba bean in the alkaline and neutral soil, but not in the acidic soil.
References
Ae N, Arihara J, Okada K (1990) Phosphorus uptake by piegeon pea and its role in cropping systems of the Indian subcontinent. Science 248:477–480
Anderson IC, Campbell CD, Prosser JI (2003) Diversity of fungi in organic soils under a moorland—Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) gradient. Environ Microbiol 5:1121–1132
Bagayoko M, Alvey S, Neumann G, Buerkert A (2000) Root-induced increases in soil pH and nutrient availability to field-grown cereals and legumes on acid sandy soils of Sudano-Sahelian West Africa. Plant Soil 225:117–127
Borda T, Celi L, Zavattaro L, Sacco D, Barberis E (2011) Effect of agronomic management on risk of suspended solids and phosphorus losses from soil to waters. J Soil Sediment 11:440–451
Bowman GM, Hutka J (2002) Particle size analysis. In: McKenzie N, Coughlan K, Cresswell H (eds) Soil physical measurement and interpretation for land evaluation. CSIRO, Collingwood, pp 224–239
Bradstreet R B (1965) The Kjeldahl method for organic nitrogen, New York
Bremner J (1965) Total nitrogen, In Methods of Soil Analysis Part 2. Ed. C Black, Am. Soc. Agron., Madison, Wisc, pp. 1149–1178
Brundrett M, Bougher N, Dell B, Grove T, Malajczuk N (1996) Working with mycorrhizas in forestry and agriculture. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, Canberra
Chardon WJ, Schoumans OF (2007) Soil texture effects on the transport of phosphorus from agricultural land in river deltas of Northern Belgium, The Netherlands and North-West Germany. Soil Use Manage 23:16–24
Clarke KR, Warwick RM (2001) Change in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation, 2nd edn. Primer-E Ltd, Plymouth
Condron LM, Goh KM (1989) Effects of long-term phosphatic fertilizer applications on amounts and forms of phosphorus in soils under irrigated pasture in New Zealand. J Soil Sci 40:383–395
Cu STT, Hutson J, Schuller KA (2005) Mixed culture of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) with white lupin (Lupinus albus L.) improves the growth and phosphorus nutrition of the wheat. Plant Soil 272:143–151
Feng X, Nielsen LL, Simpson MJ (2007) Responses of soil organic matter and microorganisms to freeze-thaw cycles. Soil Biol Biochem 39:2027–2037
Francis CA, Roberts KJ, Beman JM, Santoro AE, Oakley BB (2005) Ubiquity and diversity of ammonia-oxidizing archaea in water columns and sediments of the ocean. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:14683–14688
Frossard E, Brossard M, Hedley MJ, Metherell A (1995) Reactions controlling the cycling of P in soils. In: Tiessen H (ed) Phosphorus in the global environment. Wiley, Chichester, pp 107–138
George TS, Gregory PJ, Hocking P, Richardson AE (2008) Variation in root-associated phosphatase activities in wheat contributes to the utilization of organic P substrates in vitro, but does not explain differences in the P-nutrition of plants when grown in soils. Environ Exp Botany 64:239–249
Giovannetti M, Mosse B (1980) An evaluation of techniques for measuring vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal infection in roots. New Phytol 84:489–500
Ha KV, Marschner P, Bunemann EK, Smernik R (2007) Chemical changes and phosphorus release during decomposition of pea residues in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 39:2696–2699
Hasbullah MP, McNeill AM (2011) Legume residue influence arbuscular mycorrhiza colonisation and P uptake by wheat. Biol Fertil Soils 47:701–707
Haymann DS, Johnson AM, Ruddlesdin I (1975) The influence of phosphate and crop species on Endogone spores and vesicular arbuscular mycorrhiza under field conditions. Plant Soil 43:489–495
Henrikson A, Selmer-Olsen AR (1970) Automatic methods for determining nitrate and nitrite in water and soil extracts. Analyst 95(514)
Hinsinger P (2001) Bioavailability of soil inorganic P in the rhizosphere as affected by root-induced chemical changes: a review. Plant Soil 237:173–195
Hinsinger P, Betencourt E, Bernard L, Brauman A, Plassard C, Shen J, Tang X, Zhang F (2011) P for two, sharing a scarce resource: soil phosphorus acquisition in the rhizosphere of intercropped species. Plant Physiol 156:1078–1086
IFA (2010) International fertilizer industry association (http://www.fertilizer.org).
Iyamuremye F, Dick RP, Baham J (1996) Organic amendments and phosphorus dynamics. I. Phosphorus chemistry and sorption. Soil Sci 161:426–435
Jensen A, Jakobsen I (1980) The occrrence of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhiza in barley and wheat grown in some Danish soils with different fertilizer treatments. Plant Soil 55:403–414
Joergensen RG, Brookes PC (1990) Ninhydrin-reactive nitrogen measurements of microbial biomass in 0.5 M K2SO4 soil extracts. Soil Biol Biochem 22:1023–1027
Keerthisinghe G, Hocking PJ, Ryan PR, Delhaize E (1998) Effect of phosphorus supply on the formation and function of proteoid roots of white lupin (Lupinus albus L.). Plant Cell Environ 21:467–478
Kouno K, Information C, Tuchiya Y, Ando T (1995) Measurement of soil microbial biomass phosphorus by an anion exchange membrane method. Soil Biol Biochem 27:1353–1357
Kuo S (1996) Phosphorus. In: Spark DL (ed) Methods of soil analysis, 3rd edn. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, pp 869–919
Li L, Tang CX, Rengel Z, Zhang FS (2003) Chickpea facilitates phosphorus uptake by intercropped wheat from an organic phosphorus source. Plant Soil 248:297–303
Li SM, Li L, Zhang FS, Tang C (2004) Acid phosphatase role in chickpea/maize intercropping. Ann Bot 94:297–303
Li L, Li S-M, Sun J-H, Zhou L-L, Bao X-G, Zhang H-G, Zhang F-S (2007) Diversity enhances agricultural productivity via rhizosphere phosphorus facilitation on phosphorus-deficient soils. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:11192–11196
Li J, Xie Y, Dai A, Liu L, Li Z (2009) Root and shoot traits responses to phosphorus deficiency and QTL analysis at seedling stage using introgression lines of rice. J Genet Genomics 36:173–183
Li HG, Shen JB, Zhang FS, Marschner P, Cawthray G, Rengel Z (2011) Phosphorus uptake and rhizosphere properties of intercropped and monocropped maize, faba bean, and white lupin in acidic soil. Biol Fertil Soils 46:79–91
Lindsay WL (1979) Chemical equilibria in soils. Wiley, New York, p 449
Lynch J (1995) Root architecture and plant productivity. Plant Physiol 109:7–13
Lynch JP, Brown KM (2001) Topsoil foraging—an architectural adaptation of plants to low phosphorus availability. Plant Soil 237:225–237
Marschner P, Solaiman Z, Rengel Z (2006) Rhizosphere properties of Poaceae genotypes under P-limiting conditions. Plant Soil 283:11–24
Murphy J, Riley J (1962) A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Anal Chim Acta 27:31–36
Muyzer G, Dewaal EC, Uitterlinden AG (1993) Profiling of complex microbial populations by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of polymerase chain reaction-amplified genes coding for 16 S rRNA. Appl Environ Microb 59:695–700
Nicolaisen MH, Ramsing NB (2002) Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) approaches to study the diversity of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria. J Microbiol Meth 50:189–203
Nuruzzaman M, Lambers H, Bolland MDA, Veneklaas EJ (2005) Phosphorus benefits of different legume crops to subsequent wheat grown in different soils of Western Australia. Plant Soil 271:175–187
Poly F, Monrozier LJ, Bally R (2001) Improvement in the RFLP procedure for studying the diversity of nifH genes in communities of nitrogen fixers in soil. Res Microbiol 152:95–103
Powell CL (1982) Effects of kale and mustard crops on response of white clover to VA mycorrhizal inoculation in pot trials. NZ J Agric Res 25:461–464
Rangel-Castro JI, Killham K, Ostle N, Nicol GW, Anderson IC, Scrimgeour CM, Ineson P, Meharg A, Prosser JI (2005) Stable isotope probing analysis of the influence of liming on root exudate utilization by soil microorganisms. Environ Microbiol 7:828–838
Renneson M, Dufey J, Bock L, Colinet G (2010) Effects of parent material and land use on soil phosphorus forms in Southern Belgium. In 19th World Congress of Soil Science, Soil Solutions for a Changing World, Brisbane, Australia
Richardson AE, Hadobas PA, Hayes JE (2000) Acid phosphomonoesterase and phytase activities of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) roots and utilization of organic phosphorus substrates by seedlings grown in sterile culture. Plant Cell Environ 23:397–405
Rose TJ, Hardiputra B, Rengel Z (2010) Wheat, canola and grain legume access to soil phosphorus fractions differs in soils with contrasting phosphorus dynamics. Plant Soil 326:159–170
Saffigna PG, Powlson DS, Brookes PC, Thomas GA (1989) Influence of sorghum residues and tillage on soil organic matter and soil microbial biomass in an australian vertisol. Soil Biol Biochem 21:759–765
Sakurai M, Wasaki J, Tomizawa Y, Shinano T, Osaki M (2008) Analysis of bacterial communities on alkaline phosphatase genes in soil supplied with organic matter. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 54:62–71
Searle PL (1984) The Berthelot or indophenol reaction and its use in the analytical chemistry of nitrogen. Analyst A Review 109:549–568
Sen S, Mukherji S (2004) Alterations in activities of acid phosphatase, alkaline phosphatase, ATPase and ATP content in response to seasonally varying Pi status in okra (Abelmoschus esculentus). J Environ Biol 25:181–185
Shen JP, Zhang LM, Zhu YG, Zhang JB, He JZ (2008) Abundance and composition of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and ammonia-oxidizing archaea communities of an alkaline sandy loam. Environ Microbiol 10:1601–1611
Shimizu A, Yanagihara S, Kawasaki S, Ikehashi H (2004) Phosphorus deficiency-induced root elongation and its QTL in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Theor Appl Genet 109:1361–1368
Smith SE, Dickson S, Smith FA (2001) Nutrient transfer in arbuscular mycorrhizas: how are fungal and plant processes integrated? Aust J Plant Physiol 28:683–694
Starnes DL, Padmanabhan P, Sahi SV (2008) Effect of P sources on growth, P accumulation and activities of phytase and acid phosphatases in two cultivars of annual ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum L.). Plant Physiol Biochem 46:580–589
Tiessen H, Moir JO (1993) Charaterisation of available P by sequential extration. In: Carter MR (ed) Soil sampling and methods of analysis. Lewis, Boca Raton, pp 104–107
Vierheilig H, Coughlan AP, Wyss U, Piche Y (1998) Ink and vinegar, a simple staining technique for arbuscular-mycorrhizal fungi. Appl Environ Microbiol 64:5004–5007
Walkley A, Black IA (1934) An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci 37:29–38
Wang BL, Shen JB, Zhang WH, Zhang FS, Neumann G (2007) Citrate exudation from white lupin induced by phosphorus deficiency differs from that induced by aluminum. New Phytol 176:581–589
Wang Y, Marschner P, Zhang F (2011) Phosphorus fractions and other soil properties in the rhizosphere of wheat and legumes growing in three soils in monoculture or as mixture of wheat and legume. Plant Soil (in press).
Wilke BM (2005) Determination of chemical and physical soil properties. In: Margesin R, Schinner F (eds) Manual for soil analysis—monitoring and assessing soil bioremediation. Springer, Berlin, pp 47–93
Yadvinder-Singh B-S, Khind CS (1992) Nutrient transformations in soils amended with green manures. Adv Soil Sci 20:237–309
Zhang YY, Dong JD, Yang ZH, Zhang S, Wang YS (2008) Phylogenetic diversity of nitrogen-fixing bacteria in mangrove sediments assessed by PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Arch Microbiol 190:19–28
Zhu Y, Yan F, Zorb C, Schubert S (2005) A link between citrate and proton release by proteoid roots of white lupin (Lupinus albus L.) grown under phosphorus-deficient conditions? Plant Cell Physiol 46:892–901
Acknowledgments
We thank Collin Rivers for his help in collecting soil from Monarto and Mount Bold and Sean Mason for collecting soil from Langhorne Creek. We are grateful to the financial support from the Australian Research Council, and the China Scholarship Council.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Tim Simon George.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, Y., Zhang, F. & Marschner, P. Soil pH is the main factor influencing growth and rhizosphere properties of wheat following different pre-crops. Plant Soil 360, 271–286 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-012-1236-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-012-1236-1