Abstract
The fractional Noether symmetries and conserved quantities for non-conservative Lagrange systems with time delay are proposed and studied. Firstly, the fractional Hamilton variational principles for non-conservative Lagrange systems with time delay are established, and the fractional differential equations of motion with time delay are obtained. Secondly, based upon the invariance of the fractional Hamilton action with time delay under the group of infinitesimal transformations which depends on the generalized velocities, the generalized coordinates and the time, the fractional Noether symmetric transformations, the fractional Noether quasi-symmetric transformations and the fractional generalized Noether quasi-symmetric transformations with time delay are defined, and the criteria of the fractional symmetries are obtained. Finally, the relationship between the fractional symmetries and the fractional conserved quantities with time delay are studied, and the fractional Noether theories are established. At the end of the paper, two examples are given to illustrate the application of the results.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Fractional calculus has played a significant role in many fields during the last several decades, such as, engineering, science, applied mathematics, astrophysics, etc [1–10]. The research of fractional variational problems can be traced back to Riewes’s work [11, 12]; he utilized the fractional calculus to develop a formalism which can be used for both conservative and non-conservative systems. Agrawal [13–15] continued the study of the fractional variational problems, for general fractional variational problems involving Riemann–Liouville, Caputo and Riesz fractional derivatives. The symmetric fractional derivative was introduced by Kilmek [16], and the Euler–Lagrange equations for models depending on sequential derivatives were obtained by using the minimal action principle. The fractional variational problems of the mechanical system within Riemann–Liouville and Caputo fractional derivatives were discussed by Mulish, Herzallah and Baleanu [17–20]. A new fractional variational problem was proposed by El-Nabulsi [21, 22], which was the fractional action-like variational problem. Frederico and Torres [23–26] studied the Noether’s theorem for variational and optimal control problems based on the fractional models, and a new concept of fractional-conserved quantity, which was not constant in time, was given. Atanackovi\(\check{\text{ c }}\) [27] studied the fractional Noether theorem within the Riemann–Liouvill fractional derivatives based on the concept of classical conserved quantity. Later, Zhang [28–31] studied the differential equations of motion based on fractional models and the Noether symmetries and conserved quantities for variational problems based on the El-Nabulsi models.
The study of variational problems with time delay has a long history. For the variational problems with delay, argument was first introduced and discussed by El’sgol’c [32] in 1964. While the study of the fractional variational problems with time delay has only begun in recent years, Baleanu, Maaraba and Jarad [33–36] studied the fractional variational principles and optimal control problems with time delay within Riemann–Liouville and Caputo fractional derivatives and extended to the higher-order fractional variational and optimal control problems with time delay within Caputo fractional derivatives.
However, the study of the symmetries and conserved quantities with time delay has only just begun. In 2012, Fredrico and Torres [37] first discussed the Noether’s theorem for variational and optimal control problems with time delay, while, in 2013, Zhang and Jin [38] studied the symmetries of dynamics for non-conservative system with time delay. The Noether symmetries for non-conservative system with time delay based on fractional models have not been investigated yet in the literature.
The main aim of the paper is to study the Noether symmetries and conserved quantities for the non-conservative system with time delay based on the fractional model. The structure of this paper is as follows: In Sect. 2, the definitions and properties of Riemann–Liouville fractional derivatives are given. The fractional Lagrange equations with time delay are presented in Sect. 3. In Sect. 4, the fractional Hamilton action with time delay of dynamics systems is discussed. In Sect. 5, the definitions and criteria of the fractional Noether symmetric transformations, the fractional Noether quasi-symmetric transformations and the fractional generalized Noether quasi-symmetric transformations with time delay are obtained. In Sect. 6, the inner relationship between the fractional Noether symmetries and the fractional-conserved quantities with time delay is studied. In Sect. 7, two examples are given to illustrate the application of the results.
2 Definitions and properties of Riemann–Liouville fractional derivative
In this section, we briefly review some basic definitions and properties of fractional derivatives used in the following sections. Detailed discussion and proof can be found in Refs. [6–8].
The left Riemann–Liouville fractional derivative is defined as
and the right Riemann–Liouville fractional derivative is defined as
where \(\Gamma (*)\) denotes the Euler Gamma function and \(\alpha \) is the order of the derivative such that \(n-1\le \alpha <n\). If \(\alpha \) is an integer, the derivatives are defined in the usual sense, i.e.,
If \(f\in _{t_1}I_t^{\alpha }(L_p)\) and \(g\in _{t}I_{t_2}^{\alpha }(L_p)\), then the formula of fractional integration by part is as follows: [34]
and
where \(r\in (t_1,t_2)\), \(_{t_1}I_t^{\alpha }(L_p)\) and \( _{t}I_{t_2}^{\alpha }(L_p)\) are the left and the right Riemann–Liouville fractional integrals, respectively.
The commutation relations of \(\delta \) and \(_{t_1}D_{t}^{\alpha }\) satisfy [27]
3 Fractional equations of motion with time delay
Assume that the configuration of a mechanical system is determined by \(n\) generalized coordinates \(q_s \left( {s=1,\ldots , n} \right) \). The Hamilton principle of a non-conservative system is
where the Lagrangian \(L\) is a \({C}^2\)-function. And consider that the time delay exists in the system and the Lagrangian is
and the generalized non-potential forces are
And subject the specified initial functions
and the terminal conditions
where \(\Omega _s(t)\) is a given piecewise smooth function in \(t_1-\tau \le t\le t_1\), \(\tau \) is a given positive real number such that \(\tau <t_2-t_1\) and the derivative order \(0\!\le \! \alpha \!<\!1\), \(q_s(t_2)\) are certain values. The principle (7) can be expressed as
Making a linear change of variable \(t=\theta +\tau \) and considering the initial functions (10), we have
Substituting formula (13) into formula (12), we have
Considering the formulae (4), (5) and (6), we have
and
By utilizing (15) and (16), integrating by parts, and taking use of initial functions (10) and terminal conditions (11), we have
and
Substituting formulae (17) and (18) into formula (14), we obtain
Due to the arbitrariness of integral interval, and considering the independence of \(\delta \dot{q}_s\), we have
Taking derivative of equation (20) with respect to \(t\), we have
Equation (21) may be called the fractional Lagrange equations for non-conservative systems with time delay. If \(Q_s^{''}=0\), Eq. (21) can be expressed as
Equation (22) may be called the fractional Euler–Lagrange equations with time delay.
4 Fractional Hamilton action with time delay
The fractional Hamilton action with time delay is
where \(\gamma \) is a curve. Introduce the infinitesimal transformations of \(r\)-parameter finite transformations group
or their expansion formula is
where \(\varepsilon _\sigma (\sigma =1,2,\ldots ,r)\) are infinitesimal parameters and \(\xi _0^\sigma ,\xi _s^\sigma \) are the infinitesimal generators or generating functions of the infinitesimal transformations. Under the infinitesimal transformations (21), the curve \(\gamma \) will be transformed to a neighbor curve \(\bar{\gamma }\), and the fractional Hamilton action (20) with time delay can be expressed as
The main linear part relative to \(\varepsilon \) in the difference \(S(\bar{\gamma })-S(\gamma )\) is
By the linear change of variable \(t=\theta +\tau \), considering the initial functions (10), we have
Substituting formula (28) into formula (27), we have
Taking notice that
and considering the formulae (4)–(6), we can express the formula (29) as
where
Formulae (29) and (31) are the basic formulae for the fractional variation of Hamilton action with time delay.
5 Fractional Noether symmetries with time delay
In this section, we discuss the definitions and criteria of the fractional Noether symmetric transformations, the fractional Noether quasi-symmetric transformations and the fractional generalized Noether quasi-symmetric transformations with time delay.
Firstly, we give the definition and criteria of the fractional Noether symmetric transformations.
Definition 1
If the fractional Hamilton action (23) is an invariance of the group of infinitesimal transformations (24), the condition
is satisfied, then the infinitesimal transformations are called the fractional Noether symmetric transformations of the system with time delay.
From Definition 1 and formulae (29) and (31), we have the following criteria.
Criterion 1
For the group of infinitesimal transformations (24), the condition
is satisfied for \(t_1\le t\le t_2-\tau \), the condition
is satisfied for \( t_2-\tau < t\le t_2\), then the infinitesimal transformations (24) are the fractional Noether symmetric transformations of the system with time delay.
The formulae (34) and (35) can be expressed as
for \(t_1\le t\le t_2-\tau \), and
for \(t_2-\tau < t\le t_2\). Where \(\sigma =1,2,\ldots ,r\). When \(r=1\), Eqs. (36) and (37) are the fractional Noether identities of the system with time delay.
Criterion 2
For the infinitesimal transformations of group (25), the \(r\) equations
are satisfied for \(t_1\le t\le t_2-\tau \) and the \(r\) equations
are satisfied for \( t_2-\tau < t\le t_2\), where \(\sigma =1,2,\ldots ,r\). Then, the infinitesimal transformations (25) are the fractional Noether symmetric transformations of the system with time delay.
Secondly, we discuss the fractional Noether quasi-symmetric transformations of dynamics system with time delay within the left Riemann–Liouville fractional derivative.
Suppose that \(L_1\) is another fractional Lagrangian with time delay, if the transformations (24) accurate to first-order infinitesimal satisfy the condition
then this invariance is called the quasi-invariance of the fractional Hamilton action (23) with time delay under the group of infinitesimal transformations (24). The Lagrangian \(L_1\) and \(L\) determined by formula (40) satisfy the same differential equations. Then, the transformations are called the fractional Noether quasi-symmetric transformations. So, we have
Definition 2
If the fractional Hamilton action (23) is a quasi-invariance of the group of infinitesimal transformations (24), the condition
holds, where \(G=G(t,q_s(t),_{t_1}D_{t}^{\alpha }q_s(t),\dot{q}_s(t),q_{s}(t-\tau ), \dot{q}_{s}(t-\tau ))\) is a gauge function, then the infinitesimal transformations (24) are the fractional Noether quasi-symmetric transformations of the system with time delay.
From Definition 2 and formulae (29) and (31), we have the following criteria.
Criterion 3
For the group of infinitesimal transformations (24), the condition
is satisfied for \(t_1\le t\le t_2-\tau \) and the condition
is satisfied for \( t_2-\tau < t\le t_2\). Then, the infinitesimal transformations (24) are the fractional Noether quasi-symmetric transformations of the system with time delay.
The formulae (42) and (43) can be expressed as
for \(t_1\le t\le t_2-\tau \) and
for \(t_2-\tau < t\le t_2\), where \(\sigma =1,2,\ldots ,r\) and \(\Delta G=\varepsilon _\sigma G^\sigma \). When \(r=1\), Eqs. (44) and (45) are the fractional Noether identities of the system with time delay.
Criterion 4
For the group of infinitesimal transformations (25), the \(r\) equations
are satisfied for \(t_1\le t\le t_2-\tau \) and the \(r\) equations
are satisfied for \( t_2-\tau < t\le t_2\), where \(\sigma =1,2,\ldots ,r\). Then, the infinitesimal transformations (25) are the fractional Noether quasi-symmetric transformations of the system with time delay.
By using Criterion 1–Criterion 4, or the fractional Noether identities (36) and (37), and (44) and (45) with time delay, we can verify the fractional Noether symmetry and fractional Noether quasi-symmetry of the system with time delay.
Finally, we study the fractional Noether generalized quasi-symmetric transformations of non-conservative system with time delay.
Assume the fractional dynamics system with time delay under the generalized non-potentials forces (9). If the transformations accurate to first-order infinitesimal satisfy the condition
then this invariance is called the generalized quasi-invariance of the fractional Hamilton action (23) with time delay under the group of infinitesimal transformations (24) and the transformations are called the fractional Noether generalized quasi-symmetric transformations. So, we have
Definition 3
If the fractional Hamilton action (23) is a generalized quasi-invariance of the group of infinitesimal transformations (24), the condition
holds, then the infinitesimal transformations (24) are the fractional generalized Noether quasi-symmetric transformations of the system with time delay.
From Definition 3 and formulae (29) and (31), we have the following criteria.
Criterion 5
For the group of infinitesimal transformations (24), the condition
is satisfied for \(t_1\le t\le t_2-\tau \), the condition
is satisfied for \( t_2-\tau < t\le t_2\), then the infinitesimal transformations (24) are the fractional generalized Noether quasi-symmetric transformations of the system with time delay.
The formulae (50) and (51) can be expressed as
for \(t_1\le t\le t_2-\tau \) and
for \(t_2-\tau < t\le t_2\), where \(\sigma =1,2,\ldots ,r\). When \(r=1\), Eqs. (52) and (53) are the fractional Noether identities of the system with time delay.
Criterion 6
For the group of infinitesimal transformations (25), the \(r\) equations
are satisfied for \(t_1\le t\le t_2-\tau \) and the \(r\) equations
are satisfied for \( t_2-\tau < t\le t_2\), where \(\sigma =1,2,\ldots ,r\). Then the infinitesimal transformations (25) are the fractional generalized Noether quasi-symmetric transformations of the system with time delay.
By using Criterion 5 and Criterion 6, or the fractional Noether identities (52) and (53) with time delay, we can verify the fractional generalized Noether quasi-symmetry for non-conservative system with time delay.
6 Fractional Noether theorem with time delay
In this section, we discuss the fractional Noether theorems of dynamics system with time delay. Firstly, we give the definition of the fractional conserved quantity of dynamics system with time delay.
Definition 4
A function \(I(t,t+\tau ,q_s,_{t_1}D_{t}^{\alpha }q_s,\dot{q}_s,q_{s\tau },\dot{q}_{s\tau }, q_s(t+\tau ),\dot{q}_s,\dot{q}_s(t+\tau ), _{t_1}D_{t}^{\alpha }q_s(t+\tau ))\) is said to be a fractional conserved quantity of dynamics system (18) under study if, and only if
holds, along all the solution curves of the fractional differential equations of motion (21) with time delay.
For the fractional Lagrange system (22) with time delay that we discussed, if we can find a fractional Noether symmetric transformation or the fractional Noether quasi-symmetric transformations with time delay, then we can get a fractional conserved quantities corresponding to these symmetries by using the following Noether theorems.
Theorem 1
For the fractional Lagrange system (22), if the group of infinitesimal transformations (24) is the fractional Noether symmetric transformations under Definition 1, then there exists a system of \(r\) linear independent fractional conserved quantities with time delay as follows, there are
for \(t_1\le t\le t_2-\tau \) and there are
for \( t_2-\tau < t\le t_2\), where \(\sigma =1,2,\ldots ,r\).
Proof
According to Definition 1 and Criterion 2, and substituting Eq. (22) into (38) and (39), we have
for \(t_1\le t\le t_2-\tau \) and
for \(t_2-\tau < t\le t_2\), where \(\sigma =1,2,\ldots ,r\). Integrating formulae (59) and (60), we obtain the results. \(\square \)
Theorem 2
For the fractional Lagrange system (22), if the group of infinitesimal transformations (24) is the fractional Noether quasi-symmetric transformations under Definition 2, then there exists a system of \(r\) linear independent conserved quantities with time delay as follows, there are
for \(t_1\le t\le t_2-\tau \) and there are
for \(t_2-\tau < t\le t_2\), where \(\sigma =1,2,\ldots ,r\).
Proof
According to Definition 2 and Criterion 4, and substituting Eqs.(22) into (46) and (47), we have
for \(t_1\le t\le t_2-\tau \) and
for \(t_2-\tau < t\le t_2\), where \(\sigma =1,2,\ldots ,r\). Integrating formulae (63) and (64), we obtain the results. \(\square \)
Theorem 1 and Theorem 2 are called the fractional Noether theorems for the Lagrange system with time delay. According to the fractional Noether theorems, if we can find a fractional Noether symmetry with time delay, then we can find a fractional conserved quantity with time delay.
Finally, we discuss the fractional Noether theorem for non-conservative system (21) with time delay.
Theorem 3
For the fractional non-conservative system (21), if the infinitesimal transformations of group (24) are the fractional generalized Noether quasi-symmetric transformations under Definition 3, then there exists a system of \(r\) linear independent conserved quantities with time delay as (61) and (62).
Proof
According to Definition 3 and Criterion 6, and substituting Eqs.(21) into (54) and (55), we have formulae (63) and (64). Integrating formulae (63) and (64), we obtain the results. \(\square \)
Theorem 3 is called the fractional Noether theorems for the non-conservative systems with time delay. Especially, if the items with the fractional derivatives and with time delay vanish, Theorem 3 is reduced to the standard Noether theorem for non-conservative systems [39].
7 Examples
Example 1
Let us study a mechanical system with time delay whose Lagrangian is
where \(t\in [t_1,t_2]\) and \(\tau < t_2-t_1\) is a given real number. The following conditions are satisfied: when \(t\in [t_1-\tau ,t_1]\), \(q(t)=\Omega (t)\), where \(\Omega (t)\) is a given piecewise smooth function in \([t_1-\tau ,t_1]\); when \(t=t_2\), \(q(t)=q(t_2)\), where \(q(t_2)\) is a certain value [39].
The fractional Euler–Lagrange equation for the system is
Form the fractional Noether identity (44) and (45) with time delay, we have
Equation (67) has a solution
The generators (68) and (69) correspond to the fractional Noether symmetry and the fractional Noether quasi-symmetry of the system, respectively. According to Theorems 1 and 2, we obtain
Formulae (70) and (71) are the fractional Noether conserved quantities corresponding to the fractional Noether symmetry (68) and the fractional Noether quasi-symmetry (69) for Lagrange system with time delay, respectively. If the item with fractional derivatives vanishes, Eq. (66) can be expressed as
Equation (72) is the differential equations of motion for the system with time delay. And the formulae (70) and (71) can be expressed as
The formulae (73) and (74) are corresponding Noether conserved quantities for the system with time delay. If the delay constant vanishes, Eq. (76) can be expressed as
Equation (75) is the differential equations of motion for classical system. The formulae (73) and (74) can be expressed as
The formulae (76) and (77) are corresponding Noether conserved quantities for classical system.
Example 2
Let us study a system whose Lagrangian and generalized non-potential force are
where \(m\), \(c\) and \(\tau \) are real numbers.
From the fractional Lagrange equations (21), we have
From the fractional Noether identities (52) and (53) with time delay, we have
Equation (80) has solutions
The generators (81) and (82) correspond to the fractional generalized Noether quasi-symmetry of the system. Substituting the generators (81) and (82) into the formulae (61) and (62), we have
The conserved quantity (83) is trivial. If the item with fractional derivatives vanishes, Eq. (79) can be expressed as
Equation (85) is the differential equation of motion for the system with time delay. And formula (84) can be expressed as
The formula (86) is the Noether conserved quantity for non-conservative system with time delay. If \(\tau =0\), Eq. (85) can be expressed as
Equation (87) is the differential equation of motion for classical system. And formula (86) can be expressed as
The formula (88) is the Noether conserved quantity for classical non-conservative system.
8 Conclusion
The phenomenon of time delay is commonly found in nature and engineering; once we consider the influence of time delay, even a very simple issue, the dynamics behavior may become very complex. Therefore, it is more essential and more realistic description of mechanical system to consider a non-conservative mechanical system based on a fractional order model with time delay. In this paper, the fractional Noether symmetries and the conserved quantities for a non-conservative system with time delay within left Riemann–Liouville fractional derivatives are presented and discussed. The fractional differential equations of motion for the non-conservative system with time delay are obtained. The definitions and criteria of the fractional Noether symmetric transformations, the fractional Noether quasi-symmetric transformations and the fractional generalized Noether quasi-symmetric transformations of the system are given. And the relationship between the fractional Noether symmetries and the fractional conserved quantities with time delay is studied. If the fractional derivatives and the time delay vanish, the non-conservative Lagrange system with time delay based on fractional model is reduced to classical non-conservative Lagrange system [39]. The results of this paper are of universal significance. The approach of this paper can be further generalized to the fractional constrained mechanical systems with time delay, the fractional optimal control systems with time delay, the fractional Birkhoffian systems with time delay and so on.
References
Debnath, L.: Recent application of fraction calculus to science and engineering. Int. J. Math. Math. Sci. 2003(54), 3413–3442 (2003)
Hilfer, R.: Application of Fractional Calculus in Physics. Word Scientific, Singapore (2000)
Jesus, I.S., Machado, J.A.T.: Fractional control of heat diffusion systems. Nonlinear Dyn. 54(3), 263–282 (2008)
Kulish, V.V., Lage, J.L.: Applications of fractional calculus to fluid mechanics. Fluids Eng. 124(3), 803–806 (2002)
Magin, R.L.: Fractional calculus in bioengineering. Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 32(1), 1–104 (2004)
Miller, K.S., Ross, B.: An Introduction to the Fractional Calculus and Fractional Differential Equations. Wiley Inc., New York (1993)
Podlubny, I.: Fractional Differential Equations. Academic Press, New York (1999)
Kilbass, A.A., Srivastava, H.M., Trujillo, J.J.: Theory and Applications of Fractional Differential Equations. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2006)
West, B.J., Bologna, M., Grigolini, P.: Physics of Fractional Operators. Springer, Berlin (2003)
Chen, Y.Q., Vinagre, B.M.: A new IIR-type digital fractional order differentiator. Signal Process 83(11), 2359–2365 (2003)
Riewe, F.: Nonconservation Lagrangian and Hamiltonian mechanics. Phys. Rev. E 53(2), 1890–1899 (1996)
Riewe, F.: Mechanics with fractional derivatives. Phys. Rev. E 55(3), 3581–3592 (1997)
Agrawal, O.P.: Formulation of Euler–Lagrange equations for fractional variational problems. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 272(1), 368–379 (2002)
Agrawal, O.P.: A general formulation and solution scheme for fractional optimal control problems. Nonlinear Dyn. 38(1–4), 323–337 (2004)
Agrawal, O.P.: Fractional variational calculus and the transversality conditions. J. Phys. A Math. Gen. 39(33), 10375–10384 (2006)
Klimek, M.: Lagrangian and Hamiltonian fractional sequential mechanics. Czech. J. Phys. 52(11), 1247–1253 (2002)
Baleanu, D., Muslih, S.I.: Lagrangian formulation of classical fields within Riemann–Liouville fractional derivatives. Phys. Scripta 72(2–3), 119–121 (2005)
Baleanu, D., Muslih, S.I., Tas, K.: Fractional Hamiltonian analysis of higher order derivatives systems. J. Math. Phys. 47(10), 103503 (2006)
Herallah, M.A.E., Baleanu, D.: Fractional-order Euler–Lagrange equations and formulation of Hamiltonian equations. Nonlinear Dyn. 58(1–2), 385–391 (2009)
Herallah, M.A.E., Baleanu, D.: Fractional Euler–Lagrange equations revisited. Nonlinear Dyn. 69(3), 977–982 (2012)
El-Nabulsi, R.A: A fractional approach to nonconservative Lagrangian dynamical systems. Fizoka A. 14(4), 289–298 (2005)
El-Nabulsi, R.A: Universal fractional Euler–Lagrange equation from a generalized fractional derivate operator. Cent. Eur. J. Phys. 9(1), 250–256 (2011)
Frederico, G.S.F., Torres, D.F.M.: Nonconservative Noethers theorem in optimal control. Int. J. Tomogr. Stat. 5(W07), 109–114 (2007)
Frederico, G.S.F., Torres, D.F.M.: A formulation of Noethers theorem for fractional problems of the calculus of variations. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 334(2), 834–846 (2007)
Frederico, G.S.F., Torres, D.F.M.: Noethers theorem for fractional optimal control problems. In: Proceedings of the 2nd IFAC Workshop on Fractional Differentiation and its Applications, Porto, pp. 142–147, July 19–21 (2006)
Frederico, G.S.F., Torres, D.F.M.: Fractional conservation laws in optimal control theory. Nonlinear Dyn. 53(3), 215–222 (2008)
Atanacković, T.M., Konjik, S., Simić, S.: Variational problems with fractional derivatives: invariance conditions and Noethers theorem. Nonlinear Anal. 71(5–6), 1504–1517 (2009)
Zhang, Y.: Fractional differential equations of motion in terms of combined Riemann–Liouville derivatives. Chin. Phys. B 21(8), 084502 (2012)
Long, Z.X., Zhang, Y.: Fractional action-like variational problem and its symmetry for a nonholonomic system. Acta Mech. 225(1), 77–90 (2014)
Zhang, Y., Zhou, Y.: Symmetries and conserved quantities for fractional action-like Pfaffian variational problems. Nonlinear Dyn. 73(1–2), 783–793 (2013)
Zhang, Y., Mei, F.X.: Fractional differential equations of motion in terms of Riesz fractional derivatives. J. Beijing Inst. Technol. 32(7), 766–770 (2013) (in Chinese)
Elsgolc, L.E: Qualitative Methods in Mathematical Analysis. American Mathematical Society, Providence (1964)
Abdeljawad, T., Baleanu, D., Jarad, F.: Existence and uniqueness theorem for a class of delay differential equations with left and right Caputo fractional derivatives. J. Math. Phys. 49(8), 083507 (2008)
Jarad, F., Abdeljawad, T., Baleanu, D.: Fractional variational principles with delay within Caputo derivatives. Math. Phys. 65(1), 17–28 (2010)
Jarad, F., Abdeljawad, T., Baleanu, D.: Fractional variational optimal control problems with delayed argument. Nonlinear Dyn. 62(3), 609–614 (2010)
Jarad, F., Abdeljawad, T., Baleanu, D.: Higher order fractional variational optimal control problems with time delay. Appl. Math. Comput. 218(2), 9234–9240 (2012)
Frederico, G.S.F., Torres, D.F.M.: Noethers symmetry theorem for variational and optimal control problem with time delay. Numer. Algebra Control Optim. 2(3), 619–630 (2012)
Zhang, Y., Jin, S.X.: The Noether symmetries of dynamics for non-conservative system with time delay. Acta Phys. Sin. 62(23), 214502 (2013). (in Chinese)
Vujanovic, B.D., Jones, S.E.: Variational Methods in Nonconservative Phenomena. Academic Press, San Diego (1989)
Acknowledgments
Project was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos.10972151 and 11272227) and the Innovation Program for Scientific Research of Suzhou University of Science and Technology (No.SKCX12S_039). And we would like to thank the anonymous referees for their valuable comments and suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jin, SX., Zhang, Y. Noether symmetries for non-conservative Lagrange systems with time delay based on fractional model. Nonlinear Dyn 79, 1169–1183 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-014-1734-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-014-1734-1