Abstract
The semantic literature takes degree operators like the comparative, but also measure phrases, the equative, the superlative and so on, to be quantifiers over degrees. This is well motivated by their semantic contribution, but leads one to expect far more scope interaction than is actually observed. This paper proposes an alternative-semantic analysis of certain degree constructions, in particular constructions with little and other negative antonyms. Restrictions on scope can then be explained as intervention effects.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Abusch, Dorit. 2002. Lexical alternatives as a source of pragmatic presupposition. In Proceedings of SALT 12, ed. B. Jackson, 1–19. Ithaca NY: CLC Publications.
Beck, Sigrid: 1996. Wh-constructions and transparent logical form. PhD diss., Universität Tübingen. http://www2.sfs.nphil.uni-tuebingen.de/Alumni/Dissertationen/beck.pdf.
Beck, Sigrid. 2006. Intervention effects follow from focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 14: 1–56.
Beck, Sigrid. 2007. The grammar of focus evaluation. In ‘Interfaces + Recursion = Language’? Chomsky’s minimalism and the view from syntax and semantics, ed. Uli Sauerland, and Hans-Martin Gärtner. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Beck, Sigrid. 2010. Quantifiers in than-clauses. Semantics and Pragmatics 3: 1–72.
Beck, Sigrid. 2011. Comparison constructions. In Handbook of semantics, ed. Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger, and Paul Portner, 1341–1389. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Beck, Sigrid. 2012. Lucinda driving too fast again—the scalar properties of ambiguous than-clauses. Journal of Semantics doi:10.1093/jos/ffr011.
Beck, Sigrid, and Shin-Sook Kim. 2006. Intervention effects in alternative questions. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 9: 165–208.
Beck, Sigrid, Toshiko Oda, and Koji Sugisaki. 2004. Parametric variation in the semantics of comparison: Japanese vs. English. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 13: 289–344.
Beck, Sigrid, and Hotze Rullmann. 1999. A flexible approach to exhaustivity in questions. Natural Language Semantics 7: 249–298.
Beck, Sigrid, and Shravan Vasishth. 2009. Multiple focus. Journal of Semantics 26: 159–184.
Bhatt, Rajesh, and Roumyana Pancheva. 2004. Late merger of degree clauses. Linguistic Inquiry 35: 1–45.
Bhatt, Rajesh, and Shoichi Takahashi. To appear. Reduced and unreduced phrasal comparatives. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory.
Bierwisch, Manfred. 1989. The semantics of gradation. In Dimensional adjectives, ed. M. Bierwisch, and E. Lang, 71–261. Berlin: Springer.
Breakstone, Micha Y., Alexandre Cremers, Danny Fox, and Martin Hackl. 2011. Processing degree operator movement: Implications for semantics of differentials. Paper presented at SALT 2011, New Brunswick, NJ.
Büring, Daniel. 2007. When less is more (and when it isn’t). Paper presented at the Chicago Linguistic Society Meeting, Chicago.
Chierchia, Gennaro. 2006. Broaden your views: Implicatures of domain widening and the “logicality” of language. Linguistic Inquiry 37: 535–590.
Chierchia, G., D. Fox, and B. Spector. To appear. The grammatical view of scalar implicatures and the relationship between semantics and pragmatics. In Handbook of semantics, ed. C. Maienborn, P. Portner, and K. von Heusinger. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Elena, Guerzoni. 2006. Intervention effects on NPIs and feature movement: Towards a unified account of intervention. Natural Language Semantics 14(2): 359–398.
Fintel, Kai von, and Sabine Iatridou. 2003. Epistemic containment. Linguistic Inquiry 34(2): 173–198.
Fox, Danny. 2006. Free choice and the theory of scalar implicatures. Ms., MIT.
Frey, Werner. 1989. Syntaktische Bedingungen für die Interpretation. PhD diss., Universität Stuttgart.
Geurts, Bart. 2006. Take ‘five’: The meaning and use of a number word. In Non-definiteness and plurality, ed. Svetlana Vogeleer, and Liliane Tasmowski. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Heim, Irene. 2001. Degree operators and scope. In Audiatur Vox Sapientiae: A Festschrift for Arnim von Stechow, ed. Caroline Féry, and Wolfgang Sternefeld, 214–239. Berlin: Akademie.
Heim, Irene. 2006. Remarks on comparative clauses as generalized quantifiers. Manuscript, MIT. http://www.semanticsarchive.net.
Heim, Irene. 2007. Little. In Proceedings of SALT 16, ed. M. Gibson, and J. Howell. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.
Heim, Irene. 2008. Decomposing antonyms? In Proceedings of Sinn & Bedeutung 2007, ed. A. Gronn, 212–225. Oslo: ILOS.
Höhle, T. 1991. On reconstruction and coordination. In Representation and derivation in the theory of grammar, ed. H. Haider, and K. Netter, 139–198. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Iatridou, Sabine, and Zeijlstra, Hedde. 2010. Modals, negation and polarity. Presented at Sinn und Bedeutung 15, Saarbrücken.
Jacobs, Joachim. 1982. Syntax und Semantik der Negation im Deutschen. München: Fink.
Jacobs, Joachim. 1989. Skopus und Kohärenz. Manuscript, Universität Wuppertal.
Kennedy, Christopher. 1997. Projecting the adjective: The syntax and semantics of gradability and comparison. PhD diss., UC Santa Cruz.
Krasikova, Svetlana. 2010. Modals in comparatives. PhD diss., Universität Tübingen.
Krifka, Manfred. 1995. The semantics and pragmatics of polarity items. Linguistic Analysis 25: 209–257.
Krifka, Manfred. 1999. At least some determiners aren’t determiners. In The semantics/pragmatics interface from different points of view. Current Research in the Semantics/Pragmatics Interface, vol. 1, ed. K. Turner, 257–291. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Ladusaw, W.A. 1979. Polarity sensitivity as inherent scope relations. PhD diss., University of Texas at Austin.
Lasersohn, Peter. 1999. Pragmatic haloes. Language 75: 522–551.
Lechner, Winfried. 2004. Ellipsis in comparatives. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Linebarger, Marcia. 1987. Negative polarity and grammatical representation. Linguistics and Philosophy 10: 325–387.
Oda, Toshiko. 2008. Degree constructions in Japanese. PhD diss., University of Connecticut.
Pafel, Jürgen. 1991. Zum relativen Quantorenskopus im Deutschen. Arbeitspapiere des Sonderforschungsbereichs 340, Bericht Nr. 5, Universität Tübingen.
Penka, Doris. 2010. Negative indefinites. Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics No. 32. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pesetsky, David. 2000. Phrasal movement and its kin. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Rett, Jessica. 2008. Evaluativity and antonymy. Proceedings of SALT 17, 210–227. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.
Rooth, Mats. 1992. A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 1: 75–116.
Rooth, Mats. 1985. Association with focus. PhD diss., University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
Sauerland, Uli, and Fabian Heck. 2003. LF intervention effects in pied-piping. Proceedings of NELS 2002, 347–366. Amherst: GLSA.
Schwarzschild, Roger, and Karina Wilkinson. 2002. Quantifiers in comparatives: A semantics of degree based on intervals. Natural Language Semantics 10: 1–41.
Sharvit, Yael, and Penka Stateva. 2002. Superlative expressions, context, and focus. Linguistics and Philosophy 25: 453–504.
Siegel, M. 2002. Like: The discourse particle and semantics. Journal of Semantics 19: 35–71.
Stateva, Penka. 2000. In defense of the movement theory of superlatives. In Proceedings of ESCOL 1999, ed. Rebecca Daly, and Anastasia Riehl, 215–226. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.
Stateva, Penka. 2002. How different are different degree constructions? PhD diss., University of Connecticut.
Stechow, Arnim von. 1984. Comparing semantic theories of comparison. Journal of Semantics 3: 1–77.
Stechow, Arnim von. 2005. Different approaches to the semantics of comparison. Ms., University of Tübingen.
Szabolcsi, Anna. 1986. Comparative superlatives. In MIT working papers in linguistics, ed. Naoki Fukui, Tova R. Rapoport, and Elisabeth Sagey, 245–265. Cambridge: MIT.
Tiemann, Sonja, Vera Hohaus, and Sigrid Beck. To appear. Crosslinguistic variation in comparison: Evidence from child language acquisition. Proceedings of Linguistic Evidence 2010, Tübingen.
Williams, Edwin. 1974. Rule order in syntax. PhD diss., MIT.
Zeijlstra, H. 2004. Sentential negation and negative concord. PhD diss., University of Amsterdam.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Beck, S. DegP scope revisited. Nat Lang Semantics 20, 227–272 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-012-9081-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-012-9081-6