The paper provides a semantic analysis of intervention effects in wh-questions. The interpretation component of the grammar derives uninterpretability, hence ungrammaticality, of the intervention data. In the system of compositional interpretation that I suggest, wh-phrases play the same role as focused phrases, introducing alternatives into the computation. Unlike focus, wh-phrases make no ordinary semantic contribution. An intervention effect occurs whenever a focus-sensitive operator other than the question operator tries to evaluate a constituent containing a wh-phrase. It is argued that this approach can capture the universal as well as the crosslinguistically variable aspects of intervention effects, in a way that is superior to previous approaches. Further consequences concern other focus-related constructions: multiple focus data, NPI licensing, and alternative questions.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
C.L. Baker (1970) ArticleTitle‘Notes on the Description of English Questions: The Role of an Abstract Question Morpheme’ Foundation of Language 6 197–219
Beaver, David and Brady Clark: 2002, ‘Always and Only: Why Not All Focus-Sensitive Operators Are Alike’, ms., Stanford University
Beck, Sigrid: 1996, Wh-construction and Transparent Logical Form, PhD dissertation, Universität Tübingen. Available at http://www.sfs.uni-tuebingen.de
Sigrid Beck Kim Shin-Sook (1997) ArticleTitle‘On Wh- and Operator Scope in Korean’ Journal of East Asian Linguistics 6 339–384 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1008280026102
Beck, Sigrid and Shin-Sook Kim: to appear, ‘Intervention Effects in Alternative Questions’, Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics
Berman, Stephen: 1991, On the Semantics and Logical Form of WH-Clauses, PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst
D.N.S. Bhat (2000) ArticleTitle’ The Indefinite-Interrogative Puzzle’ Linguistic Typology 4 365–400
Boskovic, Zeliks: to appear: ‘Sometimes in [SpecCP], Sometimes in Situ’, in R. Martin, D. Michaels, and J. Uriagereka (eds.), Step by Step: Essays Honor of Howard Lasnik. Cambridge, Mass
Bruening, Benjamin and Vivian Lin: 2001, ‘Discontinuous QPs and LF Interference Effects in Passamaquoddy,’ Proceedings of SULA, Umass, April 2001
Büring, Daniel: 1996, ‘The 59th Street Bridge Accent, PhD dissertation Universität Tübingen
Daniel Büring Katharina Hartmann (2001) ArticleTitle‘The Syntax and Semantics of Focus-Sensitive Particles in German’ Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19 229–281 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1010653115493
Chang, Lissa: 1997, Wh-in-Situ Phenomena in French, PhD dissertation, University of British Columbia
Chierchia, Gennaro: 2001, ‘Scalar Implicatures, Polarity Phenomena and the Syntax/Pragmatics Interface’, forthcoming in A. Belletti (ed.), Structures and Beyond, Oxford University Press
Veneeta Dayal (1996) Locality in Wh-Quantification Kluwer Dordrecht
Eckardt Regine: 1993, ‘Adverbialsemantik und Fokusse, und wieso sie nicht zu trennen sind’, ms., Stuttgart University
von Fintel, Kai: 1994, ‘Restriction on-Quantifier Domains, PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst
Geilfuss, Jochen: 1993, ‘Nominal Quantifiers and Association with Focus’, in P. Aekema, and M. Schoorlimmer (eds), Proceedings of the Workshop on the Syntactic and Semantic Analysis of Focus (OTS Working Papers TL-93 −012), pp. 33–34. OTS, Utrecht
Guerzoni, Elena: (in prep.), ‘Intervention Effects on NPIs and Feature Movement: Towards a Unified Account of Intervention, ms., MIT
Hagstrom, Paul: 1998, Decomposin Questions, PhD dissertation, MIT
C.L. Hamblin (1973) ArticleTitle‘Questions in Montague English’ Foundations of Language 10 41–53
Martin Haspelmath (1997) Indefinite Pronouns Oxford University Press Oxford
Heim, Irene: 1984, ‘A Note on Negative Polarity and Downward Entailingness’, in Proceedings of NELS 14, pp. 98–107. GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Elena Herburger (1993) ‘Focus and the LF of NP Quantification’ U. Lahiri A.Z. Wyner (Eds) Proceedings of SALT 3. CLC Ithaca, N.Y 77–96
Honcoop, Martin: 1998, Dynamic Excursions on Weak Islands, PhD dissertation University of Leiden.
Jacobs, Joachim: 1983, Fokus und Skalen. Niemeyer, Tübingen
K.A. Jayaseelan (2001) ArticleTitle‘Questions and Question-Word Incorporating Quantifiers in Malayalam’ Syntax 4 63–93 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1467-9612.00037
Lauri Karttunen (1977) ArticleTitle‘Syntax and Semantics of Questions’ Linguistics and Philosophy 1 3–44 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00351935
Kim, Shin-Sook: 2002, ‘Focus Matters: Two Types of Intervention Effect’, paper presented at WCCFL 21, Santa Cruz
Angelika Kratzer (1991) ‘Representation of Focus’ A Stechow Particlevon D. Wunderlich (Eds) Handbook of Semantics De Gruyter Berlin 825–834
Kratzer, Angelika and Junko Shimoyama: 2002, ‘Indeterminate Pronouns: The View from Japanese’, paper presented at the 3rd Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics. Available at http://semanticsardrive.net
Manfred Krifka (1990) ArticleTitle‘Four Thousand Ships Passed through the Lock: Object-Induced Measure Function on Events’ Linguistics and Philosophy 13 487–520
Manfred Krifka (1991) ‘A Compositional Semantics for Multiple Focus Constructions’ S. Moore A.Z. Wymer (Eds) Proceedings of SALT 1. CLC Ithaca, N.Y 127–158
Manfred Krifka (1995) ArticleTitle‘The Semantics and Pragmatic of Polarity Items’ Linguistic Analysis 25 209–257
Krifka, Manfred: 1997, ‘Evidence For Focus Phrases?’, ms. University of Texas at Austin
Manfred Krifka (1998) ‘Additive Particles under Stress’ proceedings of SALT 8. CLC Publications Ithaca, N.Y 111–128
Utpal Lahiri (1998) ArticleTitle‘Focus and Negative Polarity in Hindi’ Natural Language Semantics 6 57–123
Lee, Youngjoo: 2004, ‘Scope of Focus Particles: Abstract ONLY in Korean’, in C. Meies and M. Weissgenber (eds.), proceedings of Sinn & Bedeutung 8, pp. 167–180. Available at: http://www.ub.uni-konstanz.de/kops/volltexte/2004/13831/.
Marcia Linebarger (1987) ArticleTitle‘Negative Polarity and Grammatical Representations’ Linguistics and Philosopy 10 325–387
Ulrich Lutz Gereon Mueller Arnimvon Stechow (Eds) (2000) Wh-Scope Marking Benjamins Amsterdam
Marti, Luisa: 2003 Contextual Variables, PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut
Megerdoomian, Karine and Shadi Ganjavi: 2001, ‘Against Optional Wh-Movement’, to appear in Proceedings of WECOL 12
Miyagawa, Shigeru: 1998, ‘WH Chains and Quantifier Induced Barriers’, ms, MIT
David Pesetsky (1987) ‘Wh- in Situ: Movement and Unselective Binding’ E. Reuland A. ter Meulen (Eds) The Representation of (In) definiteness MIT Press Cambridge, Mass 98–129
David Pesetsky (2000) Phrasal Movement and Its Kin MIT Press Cambridge, Mass
Ramchand, Gillian: 1997, ‘Questions, Polarity and Alternative Semantics’, Proceedings of NELS 27, pp. 383–396.GLSA, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
Reinhart, Tanya: 1992, ‘Wh-in-situ: An Apparent Paradox’, in P. Decker et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the Eighth Amsterdam Colloquium, Amsterdam
Maribel Romero Chung-hye Han (2003) ‘Focus, Ellipsis and the Semantics of Alternative Questions’ C. Beyssade O. Bonami P.C. Hofherr F. Corblin (Eds) Empirical Issues in Formal Syntax and Semantics 4. Presses Universitaires de Paris-Sorbonne Paris 291–307
Rooth, Mats: 1985, Association with Focus, PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst
Mats Rooth (1992) ArticleTitle‘A Theory of Focus Interpretation’. Natural Language Semantics 1 75–116
Mats Rooth (1996) ‘Focus’ S. Lappin (Eds) The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory. Blackwell Oxford 272–297
Ruangjaroon, Sugunya: 2002, ‘Thai Wh in-situ’, talk presented at NWCL, Simon Fraser University, April 6–7, 2002
Hotze Rullmann Sigrid Beck (1998) ‘Presupposition Projection and the Interpretation of Which-Questions’ D. Strolovich A. Lawson (Eds) Proceedings of SALT 8. CLC Ithaca, N.Y 215–232
Sauerland, Uli and Fabian Heck: 2003, ‘LF Intervention Effects in Pied-Piping’, in M. Kadowaki and S. Kawakara (eds.), Proceedings of NELS 33, pp. 347–366. GLSA, University of Massachusetts and Amherst
Andrew Simpson (2002) ArticleTitle‘Review of Phrasal Movement and Its Kin’ Syntax 5 148–166 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1467-9612.00050
Shimoyama, Junko: 2001, Wh-Constructions in Japanese, PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst
Hooi Ling Soh (2001) ‘On Intervention Effects: Some Notes from Chinese’, ms University of Minnesota Twin Cities
Tomoioka, Satoshi: 2004, ‘Pragmatics of LF Intervention Effects: Japanese and Korean Wh-Interrogatives’, ms., University of Delaware
Truckenbrodt, Hubert: 1995, Phonological Phrases; Their Relation to Syntax, Focus and Prominence, PhD dissertation MIT
Dag Wold (1996) ‘Long Distance Selective Binding: The Case of Focus’ T. Galloway S. Spence (Eds) Proceedings of SALT 6. CLC Ithaca, N.Y 311–328
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
* Many thanks to Irene Heim, Elke Kasimir, Bill Ladusaw, Craige Roberts, and two anonymous referees for important comments on the prefinal version. I am also grateful to Hani Babu, Reinier van den Born, Liang Chen, Lisa Cheng, Danny Fox, Elena Guerzoni, Fabian Heck, Ji-yung Kim, Shin-Sook Kim, Angelika Kratzer, Luisa Marti, Cecile Meier, Toshiko Oda, Sei-Rang Oh, Ning Pan, David Pesetsky, Tanya Reinhart, Sugunya Ruangjaroon, Uli Sauerland, Yael Sharvit, Arnim von Stechow, Satoshi Tomioka as well as audiences at UMass, UConn, Universität Frankfurt, Universität Tübingen, and ‘Sinn and Bedeutung 8’. Special thanks to the organizers of the 2004 Michigan Workshop in Linguistics and Philosophy, Josh Brown and Rich Thomason, as well as the workshop participants. Finally, I would like to thank my informants for the survey: Jonathan Bobaljik, Christine Brisson, Sarah Felber, Kyle Johnson, Lisa Matthewson, Karen OBrian, and William Snyder for English, and Klaus Abels, Annett Eichstätt, Cornelia Endriss, Stephen Kepser, Winnie Lechner, Reimar Müller, Albert Ortmann, Irene Rapp, Frank Richter, and Ede Zimmermann for German.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Beck, S. Intervention Effects Follow from Focus Interpretation*. Nat Lang Seman 14, 1–56 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-005-4532-y
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-005-4532-y